Notes Part 1
Notes Part 1
1.1. Definitions
Manufacturing system: series of value-adding manufacturing processes converting the raw materials
into more useful forms and eventually finished products.
Work-in-process (WIP): number of parts that have been released to the shop floor for manufacturing
but have not yet been completed [num].
At each process/operation there are three types of WIP
Waiting to be processed
Currently being processed
Completed, but not yet passed on
Waiting to
be processed
Currently in
process
Completed,
but not yet
passed on
WIP
WIP
Process 1
WIP
Process 2
Process 3
WIP at Process 2
Inventory: stock that a company keeps at its premises (or at other locations) that are ready or will be
ready to be made into products for sale. It serves as a buffer between manufacturing and order
fulfilment. There are three types of inventory:
Raw materials
Work-in-Progress products
Finished goods
Product life cycle: The engineering of a product undergoes a 'life cycle', starting with the realisation
of the need for the product through to servicing, maintenance, withdrawal and replacement. The
major phases within a product life cycle are:
Requirements Analysis
Design
Development
Manufacture
Test
Installation / commissioning
Maintenance / Service
Replacement/Disposal
Process 1
Goods
Information
Process 2
Process 3
Process 1
Process 2
Process 3
Goods
Information
No excess inventory.
Can react better to demand uncertainties.
Equipment is general-purpose.
The parts spend most of the time waiting or moving and only 5% on the machine.
After the batch is produced the equipment can be set up to produce other
components/products.
Product family planning enables manufacturers to share certain common components across
the products in the family so that economy of scale is achieved at the component level.
Manufacturers design the basic product architecture and options while customers are
allowed to select the assembly combination that they prefer most.
Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems are utilised to create high variety in the
final assembly through combinational assembly.
Mass
Mass
production
Quantity
customisation
Batch
production
Jobbing
Product variety
1.4. Types of manufacturing systems based on machines
1.4.1. Individual machines
Due to the use of universal equipment and lack of automated materials handling system the
production rate is low.
Machining workshop
Lathes
Milling machines
Presses
Drilling machines
Shaping machines
S
Bending machines
B
Robot
Drilling
machine
D
L
R
M
Milling
machine
Storage
G
Grinding
machine
Automated factory with limited operator presence (tool and pallet setup, supervision).
Fixed automation manufacturing system with dedicated processing and material- handling
equipment.
Production rates are high due to the specialised equipment, but the flexibility is very low
(often there is no flexibility at all; the line only produces one item).
Automatic
Number of products
Production
Lines
Flexible
Manufacturing
systems
Manufacturing
cells
General purpose
machines
Variety of products
1.5. Management Philosophy
A management philosophy is a set of principles that are used to try and reduce costs.
Therefore a management philosophy should:
(1). Identify the costs to be reduced.
(2). Prioritise these costs.
(3). Identify how these costs can be reduced.
Main management philosophies studied in MM354:
TQM
JIT
Lean Manufacturing
6 Sigma
2.
Financial Calculations
GP gross profit
TR Total revenue
TC Total cost
Gross profit (= Sales profit).
Revenue (= Sales = Turnover): income that a business has from its normal business activities,
usually from the sale of goods and services to customers.
Break-even is the point of balance making neither a profit nor a loss (Gross profit = 0).
Variable costs (VC): costs that depend on the production volume. Variable costs are calculated for
each produced unit [/unit].
Direct material costs (materials from which the products are made)
Direct energy (energy to produce a product)
Direct labour cost (salaries of workers who produce the parts)
Packaging, freight
Some costs can be in both categories. For example, equipment depreciation may or may not depend
on the production volume. Some part of the energy consumption (e.g. electricity, heating of offices)
does not depend on the production volume, while energy consumed by machine tools depends on
the number of parts produced. It is necessary to be able to split costs between the two categories.
In its simplest form, the total cost TC to produce n units (parts) is:
( )
This graph looks like:
TC
FC
n
High-Low Method
The simplest way to split the total cost into variable and fixed costs is to use the High-Low method.
It uses the total cost at the highest and lowest volume of production. It is assumed that at both
points of activity the total amount of fixed costs is the same. Therefore, the change in the total costs
is assumed to be the variable cost rate times the change in the number of units produced.
In order to split the total cost into variable and fix costs, the company needs to record the total cost
and production volume for a number of years:
Year
Total Cost
(million euros)
Then we draw a scatterplot of the total cost vs. the production volume for each year of the
production:
Total cost, TC
TCmax
TCmin
FC
nmin
nmax
Production volume, n
(
This means that the slope of the total cost production volume line equals the variable cost VC.
Once VC is found, the fixed cost FC is calculated. The line passes through the two furthermost
points (hence the name High-Low method) and crosses the ordinate at FC (at n = 0 VC = 0).
Lets use the point at maximum production volume nmax:
From here:
)]
The following formulas can calculate the parameters of the best fit straight line (best VC and FC):
) (
) (
( )
(
)
Total cost, TC
FCbest
20
40
60
80
100
Production volume, n
( )
Unit cost, UC
Production volume, n
From this figure it can be seen that as the production volume increases, the unit cost decreases. This
is known as economies of scale.
2.1.4. Economies and Diseconomies of Scale
Economies of scale: cost advantage that companies obtain due to size, output or scale; unit cost
generally decreasing with increasing scale as fixed costs are spread out over more units of output.
Example: M8 bolt; it is produced in mass production, so the equipment cost is spread out over
millions of parts.
Note: although economies of scale are generally connected with fixed costs, they can also happen
due to decreased variable costs. Example: raw materials ordered in large quantities may be cheaper.
Diseconomies of scale: it is the opposite of economies of scale. It forces companies to produce
products with increased unit cost when the production volume increases. This happens when
economies of scale have limits.
Unit cost, UC
Economies of
scale
Diseconomies of
scale
Production volume, n
Exceeding the limits of nearby raw material supply: raw materials have to be transported
from further away.
Saturation of local markets: produced goods have to be transported further away.
Duplication of effort: in a company with many thousands of workers it is very likely that
similar projects are taken on by several teams. Example: General Motors CAD/CAM
systems.
Self-competition: the own products of a large company may compete with each other.
Example: Buick and Oldsmobile.
Slow response time: it is more difficult for larger companies to react quickly to changed
customer demands. They need to re-build highly specialised production lines as opposed to
SMEs with flexible manufacturing.
Inertia (unwillingness to change): old, large, successful companies are less willing to change
on the basis that they have been doing things a certain way and have always been successful.
Example: Polaroid Corporation. Example: Kodak.
Public and government opposition: the behaviour of large multinational corporations may be
seen as anti-competitive and monopolistic thread and their growth is often limited by law.
Example: Microsoft.
Large market share: A small company with only a 1% market share could potentially double
market share, and hence revenues, in a year. A large company with 90% market share will
find it difficult to do so well, as this would require that they control 180% of the original
market. Unless the total market size is increasing rapidly, this isn't possible.
TC ()
10,000
10,455
10.700
10.842
Production volume n
100
101
102
103
MC
455
245
142
If we have a formula (continuous function) of TC(n) in terms of the production volume n, then
( )
( )
Total cost, TC
TCi+1
MCR
TCi
MCC
ni
ni+1
Production volume, n
Suppose at production volume ni the total cost is TCi. In order to produce ni+1 parts the total cost is
TCi+1. Thus the cost of producing an extra part, which is the marginal cost, is:
Since TC(n) is a continuous function, at each production volume ni it is possible to calculate MCC
by defining the slope of the tangent.
which is the derivative of the TC function at ni. Note that since we cannot produce less than one unit
the calculated marginal cost (MCC) is slightly different from the real one (MCR). However, this is a
good approximation of the marginal cost.
If at a certain production volume n the sale price of the product is less than the marginal cost the
company should not produce the product because it will generate negative profit.
Example: in the ideal situation, when
of scale:
( )
and
( )
( )
Marginal revenue (MR): it is the additional revenue that will be generated by increasing product
sales by one unit.
( )
( )
TR Total revenue
Marginal profit (MP): it is the additional profit that will be generated by increasing product sales by
one unit. Marginal profit is the difference between the marginal revenue and the marginal cost of
producing one additional unit of output.
(
( )
( )
( ))
( )
( )
GP Gross profit
Under the marginal approach to profit maximisation, to maximise profits, a company should
continue to produce a product up to the point where marginal profit is zero.
Explanation: if marginal revenue is greater than marginal cost at some production volume, marginal
profit is positive and thus a greater quantity should be produced, and if marginal revenue is less than
marginal cost, marginal profit is negative and a lesser quantity should be produced. At the
production volume at which marginal revenue equals marginal cost, marginal profit is zero and this
quantity is the one that maximises profit. Since total profit increases when marginal profit is
positive and total profit decreases when marginal profit is negative, it must reach a maximum where
marginal profit is zeroor where marginal cost equals marginal revenueand where lower or
higher output levels give lower profit levels.
Thus, for maximum profit:
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
This means that maximum profit occurs when the marginal revenue is equal to the marginal cost.
In the ideal situation, when
and
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
( )
However, when at a certain production volume diseconomies of scale start to occur, n has to be
defined so that
( )
( )
When this condition is true, the production volume is optimum (nopt) and profit is maximum.
Costs
Production volume, n
( )
( )
The profit-volume chart shows the total profit as a function of the production volume.
Gross profit, GP
Production volume, n
FC
Break-even point
Here we assume that the demand is independent of the sale price (SP) of the product and other
factors. In reality, this is NEVER the case. The most important factors that influence demand:
Price of the product: There is an inverse relationship between the price of a product and the
amount of that product consumers are willing and able to buy; the lower the price, the higher
the demand (and vice versa). This is called The Law of Demand.
The price of related products: example: accessories for a product. If the price of the related
product goes up, demand for the original product decreases.
The income of the consumer: this can have both direct and inverse relationship with
demand. For products that are called normal goods demand increases when the consumers
income increases. Most products are like these. However, there are products called inferior
goods for which demand decreases with increased consumer income (e.g. low-spec cars,
junk food).
Tastes, fashion, endorsement by celebrities,
Expectations, forecast: example: if it is expected that a new product with better
characteristics comes out soon, demand for the current product may drop.
For simplicity lets assume that sale price (SP) is the only factor affecting demand (D), so
(
The form of this function is not known in advance, but there are two assumptions:
as
as
The simplest function with these two properties is a power-law function of the form:
(
Demand, D
Sale price, SP
from here:
( )
( )
( )
( )
Total Revenue, TR
The revenue function at power-law demand is shown below. This curve is different from the linear
revenue function.
TR(n) = SPn
Power-law demand
Production volume, n
From this curve it follows that it is very difficult to maximise revenue. In order to increase profit, it
is usually easier to minimise the total cost. This is the task of operations management.
Productivity: measures the efficiency of a person, machine, factory, manufacturing system, etc. in
converting inputs into outputs.
Some common productivity measures:
The productivity measure used should be based on the strategy adopted for competing in the
marketplace. E.g. a company that competes based on speed would probably measure productivity as
units produced/time.
Examples:
(1). Value of weekly output = 10,200; value of weekly inputs = 8600.
Note that productivity here is unitless because the units of both output and input are the same.
(2). A bakery produces 346 pastries in 4 hours.
[
Note that you can only combine inputs with identical units.
Productivity has meaning only when it is compared with a similar productivity measure or when
it is measured over time.
Capital is one of the most important inputs into a manufacturing system. It is necessary to minimise
costs associated with capital.
Typical capital-related problems:
A company can buy a machine by paying 100,000 now or 50,000 now and 60,000 in a
year. Which option is better, i.e., cheaper?
How to compare future capital payments of various lengths?
What is a future payment worth today, i.e., what is its present value?
Key concept: present value of a future payment (PV). The higher the PV, the better. PV (also known
as present discounted value) is the value of an expected income stream determined as of the date of
valuation. PV is always less than or equal to the future value (FV) because money has interestearning potential (assuming the interest rate is positive). PV is sometimes called the principal.
If the total period of payment is longer than one, interest is paid upon interest, so compound interest
should be calculated.
Present value of a (future) lump sum
If the future payment (value) only consists of one lump sum, its present value is:
( )
PV present value
FV future value
i interest rate for one period (e.g. one year)
n number of interest periods (e.g. number of years the payment is made)
( )
( )
To compare the change in purchasing power, the real interest rate (nominal interest rate minus
inflation rate) should be used. Most actuarial calculations use the risk-free interest rate which
corresponds to the minimum guaranteed rate provided by a bank's saving account; then inflation
rate should be subtracted.
The interest rate in capital-related problems is traditionally called the cost of capital.
Discounting: Calculating the PV (based on FV).
Capitalising: Calculating the FV (based on PV).
If
, invest.
If
, dont invest.
20,000
10,000
-10,000
IRR = 0.1078
-20,000
0.05
0.1
0.2
0.15
Return Rate, r
At
, so
Using a solver. Example: MS Excel has an IRR() function that can calculate Internal Rate of
Return.
Build the NPV function by calculating many points on it and intersect it with the
horizontal line.
Approximation of the NPV function near the IRR value with a straight line.
In order to approximate the NPV function with a straight line, we need to find two points on it on
either side of the
horizontal line with a positive and negative NPV value.
IRR
Return Rate, r
We connect the two points with a straight line segment, and this segment intersects the
horizontal line it defines the approximate value of the IRR.
Note: the closer the two points are to the
approximation.
50
-50
-100
-150
0.15
0.1
0.05
0.2
Return Rate, r
In this case there are two solutions for IRR: 0% and 10%.
A typical example: power plant.
Comparison of Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return:
NPV: measures magnitude of return of an investment
IRR: measures the rate of return of an investment
IRR should not be used to rate mutually exclusive projects, but only to decide whether a single
project is worth investing in. This is because a project with lower IRR may still have higher NPV
(which is the total increase of wealth).
Example:
Year (n)
0
1
2
A only
A better
B better
Neither
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
A
-5,000
-10,000
-15,000
-20,000
0
IRRB = 0.196
r = 0.115
0.05
0.1
IRRA = 0.237
0.15
0.25
0.2
0.3
0.35
0.4
Return Rate, r
Although A has a higher IRR than B, at certain return rates (
NPV, so it should be preferred.
) B produces higher
Payback (or payoff) tells the number of years for an investment to pay for itself.
[
The shorter the payback period, the better, because the investors initial investment is
at risk for a shorter period of time.
Advantages of the Payback method:
Simple method.
Gives a quick estimate of a project.
Disadvantages of the Payback method:
Time value of money: is not considered (cash generated later is worth less than
cash at the moment).
Multiple investments: the method does not work well if cash investments are
required at several stages.
Profitability: the method focuses upon the time required to pay back the initial
investment; it does not calculate the ultimate profitability of the project. It can
happen that a project with short payback period generates very little (or not at
all) profit.
Asset life span: If an assets useful life expires immediately after it pays back
the initial investment, then there is no opportunity to generate profit. Since the
payback method does not incorporate any assumption regarding asset life span,
there is no way to tell what profit is generated.
Cash flow after the payback period: the method does not consider additional
cash flows after the payback period.
Incorrect averaging: if the annual cash flows are not uniform, averaging them
may suggest incorrect payback periods.
Example: After an initial investment of 100,000 the project will bring in cash
flows:
Cash flow []
10,000
20,000
200,000
Year
1
2
3
The total cash flow for 3 years is 230,000 which averages at 76,666. The
payback period is then calculated as:
[
Year
0
1
2
3
Cash flow []
-100,000
+10,000
+20,000
+200,000
Balance []
-100,000
-90,000
-70,000
+130,000
After year 2 the project still has a negative balance, so the real payback period
obviously cannot be 1.3 years (it is between 2-3 years).
Summary: the payback method should not be used as the sole criterion for project
evaluation, but can be used for quick comparisons.