0 Steimel-1 PDF
0 Steimel-1 PDF
0 Steimel-1 PDF
Power-Electronics Issues of
Modern Electric Railway Systems
A. STEIMEL, Senior Member, IEEE
Ruhr-University Bochum
D-44780 Bochum, Germany
steimel@eele.rub.de
remaining European carbuilders is part of the Canadian
global transportation company Bombardier, while the Swiss
"newcomer" Stadler Rail is a carbuilder, who founds on
inverters from ABB Industry. More innovative and by
standardization at the same time economically competitive
vehicle concepts were to be developped.
I. INTRODUCTION
During the second half of the 20th century, the railways
im-portance declined due to the rise of individual transport,
in the form of the private motor car and the truck, as well as
the air- plane, whose speed and versatility the railway could
not apparently match. Only by the close of the century, a
change of mind set in: Due to congestion of public traffic by
individual transport, track-bound public mass transit
becomes more and more appealing. But governmental
control proved inadequate to meet the demands to the
railway systems; thus, programs of decentralization and
deregulation were applied to railway transit. EU Directive
91/440 intended to enable and organize the barrier-free
coexistence and competition of governmental and private
railway operators, splitting the formerly state-owned
railways into industrially-organized, competing train
operators and further-on state-owned infrastructure
providers.
Ever since the beginning of the 1990s, the European
railway industry had to face constant change; the
restructuring of the railway organisations by deregulation
and privatization led first to a decline in orders and in
consequence to amalgamation. Engineering industry
divisions formerly responsible for the supply of the
mechanical components of traction units were integrated
into the transportation divisions of the electrical large-scale
industrial companies, the latter now acting as leaders of
system technology. This holds most directly for ALSTOM,
Siemens and the former ABB/ADtranz; Bombardier
Transportation which absorbed ADtranz and most of the
Figure 2. 1.6-MW cardan hollow-shaft drive with rubber joints, brake discs
on extra high-geared shaft in front (BB 1216, Siemens).
10th International Conference on DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION SYSTEMS, Suceava, Romania, May 27-29, 2010
The line-friendly Four-Quadrant Converter (4q-C, [3]) is
standard with all AC-fed traction vehicles.
B. High-Speed Trains
The first generation of high-speed trains (HST) as TGV in
France and ICE in Germany pursued the Power Head
concept (Fig. 3, top), with special asymmetric, streamlined
locomotives and trailers. Due to the heavy axle-load of
1820 to, this is not suited for speeds over 250 km/h. The
distributed drive with about half or three-quarter of the axles
driven with lighter motors prevails now, as in Japanese
design, while the electronic equipment and the transformers
are mounted underfloor (Velaro [4], AGV [5], vmax = 350
kph; Fig. 3 bottom). Tilting [6] raises commercial speed up
to 220 kph on curved secondary main-lines, where highspeed upgrading is not justified.
,
70% Niederflur
SR
SR
70% low-floor
350 mm
Einzelrad-Einzelfahrwerke
Single trailing wheels
SR
SR
100% Niederflur
100% low-floor
,
Beispiel: Variotram
(ADtranz)
10th International Conference on DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION SYSTEMS, Suceava, Romania, May 27-29, 2010
TABLE I. NETWORK LINE LENGTHS AND PROPORTION OF ELECTRICAL
RAILWAY SYSTEMS (2003)
DC 1500 V
DC 3000 V
AC 15 kV/16 2/3 Hz
AC 25kV/50 (and 60) Hz
Others
Total
15,320 km
72,105 km
32,390 km
106,437 km
11,350 km
237,600 km
6.5 %
30.3 %
13.6 %
44.8 %
4.8 %
100.0 %
Figure 7. DB Class 120 and Austrian (BB) Class 1216.
3~
3~
3~
3~
3~
3~
3~
Dieselelektrische Lokomotive
=
1~
=
1~
3~
3~
3~
10th International Conference on DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION SYSTEMS, Suceava, Romania, May 27-29, 2010
Nice City Light Rail is bridging wireless sections, not
equipped with overhead contact line, of less than 450 m by
means of a NiMH high-performance battery, since July
2007.
C. Medium-Frequency Transformer
To avoid the enormous weight of the 16.7-Hz
transformer, a new topology was developed using a
medium-frequency (e.g. 5 kHz in the MW-power range).
The 15-kV line voltage is rectified by 8 cascaded modules
with 6.5-kV IGBTs connected in series, each comprising of
an input H-bridge and a (resonantly operated) output half-
10th International Conference on DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION SYSTEMS, Suceava, Romania, May 27-29, 2010
bridge, feeding the MF transformer primary (Fig. 12).
15 kV / 16.7 Hz
line
reactor
(8) cascaded
modules
transformer
5 kHz
secondary
converter
33.4 Hz
resonant
circuit
1.65 kV
DC
E. Stator-flux-oriented control
Stator-flux orientation leads the tip of the stator-flux
space phasor by control on a predetermined trajectory, in the
case of low switching frequency (GTO converters) on a
regular hexa-gon or an eighteen-corner curve (Flux SelfControl); the radius of this trajectory equals the modulus of
the stator-flux space vector. The actual values are estimated
in a Machine Model from measured stator currents and
stator voltages, modelled from measured DC-link voltage
and IGBT switching commands. The tracking speed is given
by the torque controller, in case of the original Direct Self
Control [23], [24], [20] by direct hysteresis control with
overlaid average switching-frequency control, allowing
optimal torque dynamics. This control is increasingly
detached by quasi-synchronous pulsing [25], [26], with the
switching points derived from reaching preset stator-flux
thresholds. This is mainly due to the less critical line
interference of a synchronous pulsing.
In case of high switching frequency (IGBT converters) a
multi-corner polygon, nearly a circle, is chosen without
detriment, meaning mainly sinusoidal currents; the stator
voltages are controlled by PWM. Indirect Stator-Quantities
Control (ISC, [27], [28], [20], [1]) again controls the statorflux modulus as the radius of the trajectory by means of
a flux modulus controller (output k, Fig. 14). The tracking
speed in the sampled system the angular increment
per sampling period Tm results from the output of a linear
torque controller, backed by a feed-forward Stat. The
inputs of this controller are first converted to slip-frequency
values, to prevent breakdown of the machine easily by
limiting the set value to some 80% of rotor breakdown
frequency rK..
10th International Conference on DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION SYSTEMS, Suceava, Romania, May 27-29, 2010
The two controller outputs k and are processed in
block X into the necessary change of the stator-flux space
vector in the next sampling period, , which divided by
the sampling period delivers the inner (magnetizing) voltage
u. To that the voltage drop at the stator resistance Rsis is
added; the result, normalized to Ud, is the input for the
Pulse-Width Modulator
In addition, but not shown here, a very effective Dynamic
Field-Weakening is provided in this controller [27]. The
Machine Model delivers the model stator currents, which are
compared in a Luenberger Observer with the measured
values, to compensate parameter and inverter voltage errors
[28]. This control is highly dynamic, especially in the fieldweakening region, and very robust against input voltage
disturbances.
This control has been taken as basis for a speed-sensorless
control, doing away with sensitive and damage-prone
sensors in the bogie-mounted motors. To that purpose, the
mentioned errors are compensated diligently in a feedforward manner; thus the Luenberger Observer is not
needed anymore, and the comparison of measured (isw) and
modelled (is) stator-current space vectors is used to estimate
two other parameters, that is speed and stator resistance
[28]. A stator-current DC-component observer suppresses of
"unwanted" (parasitic) DC components in stator flux and
current, allowing operation with very low frequencies ( 1%
frated). A special flux-amplitude management enables speed
estimation even at stator frequency zero and thus stopping a
train running slowly down and accelerate in the opposite
direction, without any speed sensor signal.
[29], [30] report on the successful implementation of a
speed-sensorless system, based on the described one, in the
new SITRAC Siemens traction control, which has been
intensively tested in different light-rail and Metro
applications all over the world and is now the standard
solution for Siemens Underground and Metro trains.
10th International Conference on DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION SYSTEMS, Suceava, Romania, May 27-29, 2010
U
uA
0,5
1
t/T
U
U
uB
0,5
U
2U
u2
i2
U
0
0,5
F
Figure 19. Line voltage u1 and line current i1, module voltage ua11 and arm
current ia1, arm voltage ua1 of a MLC. n = 8, fzmodule = 600 Hz. u1 and ua1
normalized to UPN,rated; ua11 to UPN/n, currents to 1,rated .
3) 2 U
Five plants for the Swedish and two for the German
infrastructure company are under contract with Siemens.
P
ua11
T1
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
D1
C
ux
ua1
n
SM
u1
i1
SM
T2
SM
SM
SM
SM
1
2
110 kV/
16,7 Hz
u45
3
110 kV/
50 Hz
ucx
D2
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
SM
5
SM
SM
SM
SM
10th International Conference on DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION SYSTEMS, Suceava, Romania, May 27-29, 2010
[13] Gerster, C.; Skarpetowski, G.; Sommer, H.; Still, L.: Advanced multi-
system traction chain for locomotives and power heads. 10th Conf.
on Power Electronic and Motion Control (EPE-PEMC), Riga 2004
[14] Buscher, M.; Kck, F.; Trotsch, P.; Bikle, U.: TRAXX: Integrale
Plattform zur Steigerung der Wettbewerbsfhigkeit des Schienenverkehrs. ETR Eisenbahntechnische Rundschau 9/2006
[15] Steiner, M., Scholten, J.: Energy Storage onboard of railway vehicles,
11th Europ. Conf. on Power Electronics, Dresden 2005
[16] Binder, A.; Greubel, K.; Piepenbreier, B.; Tlle, H.-J.: PermanentMagnet Synchronous Drive with Wide Field-Weakening Range.
ETEP Vol. 8 (1998), No. 3, S. 157166
[17] Jckel, A.: Getriebelose Drehstromantriebe fr Schienenfahrzeuge.
Elektrische Bahnen 101 (2003), H. 3, S. 113119
[18] Jckel, A.; Lwenstein, L.; Teichmann, M.; Hoffmann, Th.; v.
Wangelin, F.: Syntegra Innovativer Prototyp einer nchsten
Triebfahrwerk-Generation. Elektrische Bahnen 104 (2006), Nr. 8/9,
pp. 360369
[19] Engel, B.; Victor, M.; Bachmann, G.; Falk, A.: 15 kV/16.7 Hz Energy
Supply System with Medium Frequency Transformer and 6.5 kV
IGBTs in Resonant Operation. 10th Europ. Conf. on Power
Electronics (EPE), Toulouse 2003
[20] Steimel, A.: Control of the induction machine in traction. Elektrische
Bahnen 96 (1998), Nr. 12, pp. 361369
[21] Blaschke, F.: The principle of field orientation as applied to the new
TRANSVECTOR closed-loop control system for rotating machines.
Siemens Review (1972), S. 217226
[22] Gedeon, G.; Klausecker, K.; Lang, W.: Mikrocomputer-Ansteuerung
fr ICE. Elektrische Bahnen 86 (1988), Nr. 7, pp. 229235
[23] Depenbrock, M.: Direct Self-Control (DSC) of Inverter-Fed Induction
Machine. IEEE Trans. on Power Electronics, vol. 4, pp. 420429,
1988
[24] Jnecke, M.; Kremer, R.; Steuerwald, G.: Direct Self Control (DSC),
A Novel Method Of Controlling Asynchronous Machines in Traction
Applications. Elektrische Bahnen 88 (1990), No. 3, pp. 8187
[25] Wrner, K.; Steimel, A.; Hoffmann, F.: Highly Dynamic Stator Flux
Track Length Control for High Power IGBT Inverter Traction Drives.
8th Europ. Conf. on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE),
Lausanne 1999.
[26] Steimel, A.: Direct Self Control and Synchronous Pulse Techniques
for High-Power Traction Inverters in Comparison. IEEE Transactions
on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 51 (2004), No. 4, pp. 810-820
[27] Jnecke, M.; Hoffmann, F.: Fast Torque Control of an IGBT-InverterFed Three-Phase A.C. Drive in the Whole Speed Range
Experimental Results. 6th Europ. Conf. on Power Electronics, Sevilla
1995, Vol. 3, pp. 399404
[28] Depenbrock, M.; Foerth, Ch.; Hoffmann, F.; Koch, S.; Steimel, A.;
Weidauer, M.: Speed-sensorless stator-flux-oriented control of
induction motor drives in traction. Communications Scientific
Letters of the University of Zilina 23/2001, pp. 6875
[29] Amler, G.; Sperr, F.; Hoffmann, F.: Highly dynamic and speed
sensorless control of traction drives. 10th Europ. Conf. on Power
Electronics (EPE), Toulouse 2003
[30] Weidauer, M.; Foerth, C.; Robust speed-sensorless control of
induction motors in traction applications (in German). Intern. ETGCongress, Karlsruhe 2007; ETG-Fachbericht 107, pp. 431-440
[31] Thoma, M.; Jampen, U.: Statische Frequenzumrichteranlage Wimmis
(Schweiz). Elektrische Bahnen 104 (2006), H. 12, S. 576-583
[32] Dicks, H.; Janning, J.: Standardumrichter Typ BAUM fr DB
Energie. Elektrische Bahnen 98 (2000), H. 10, S. 364373
[33] Wrede, H.; Umbricht, U.: Development of a 413 MW railway power
supply converter. 35th Ann. Conf. of IEEE Industrial Electronics
Society (IECON '09), Porto 09
[34] Lesnicar, A.; Marquardt, R.: A new modular voltage source inverter
topology. 10th European Power Electronic Conf. (EPE), Toulouse
2003
[35] Menth, St.; Meyer, M.: Low-frequency power oscillations in electric
railway systems. Elektrische Bahnen 104 (2006), H. 5, S. 216221
[36] Heising, C., Oettmeier, M., Danielsen, St., Staudt, V. and Steimel, A.:
Improvement of low-frequency railway power system stability using
an advanced multivariable control concept. 35th Ann. Conf. of the
IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON09), Porto 2009, pp.
565570
VII. CONCLUSION
The intense competition after deregulation of railways
and the new formation of railway industry led to many
innovative designs of electric traction vehicles, attractive for
the customer and economic to operate, mainly enabled by
high-performance induction machines fed by IGBT
converters and the high degree of modularity it offers for a
broad variety of traction vehicles. Field-oriented control,
mainly that in the stator-flux-oriented variant, allows to
exploit the increased tractive power stably, at uncertain
wheel-rail contact and with vibratory drive chains. Powerelectronic converters dominate now the power supply in the
Central European 16.7-Hz interconnected grid.
VIII. ABBREVIATIONS
AGV
EMU
HST
ICE
IGBT
IGCT
IM
NPC
PMSM
SMA
TGV
VSI
REFERENCES
[1] Steimel, A.: Electric Traction: Motion Power and Energy Supply
Oldenbourg-Verlag Mnchen, 2008