Descriptive APA Style
Descriptive APA Style
Social
SD
SD
Logical Thinking
15.69
3.81
19.00
2.62
Self-Regulation
95.72
12.20
96.79
7.85
Interpersonal Intelligence
93.31
10.78
99.67
9.18
Student Achievement
21.93
8.32
9.21
4.99
Figure 8. Box Plot of students' Logical Thinking Skill, Self-regulation, Interpersonal Intelligence, and
Learning Achievement in two different types of class
Regression Analysis
Table 2
Model summary for variables predicting students achievement
Model
1
Adjusted R
Std. Error of
R Square
Square
the Estimate
0.69
0.48
0.42
7.18
a. Predictors: (Constant), Year of Student, Type of Class, SelfRegulation, Logical Thinking, Interpersonal Intelligence
Table 3
Regression analysis summary for variables predicting students achievement (F Test)
Sum of
1
Model
Squares
df
Mean Square
Sig.
Regression
2215.512
443.102
8.599
.000**
Residual
2421.960
47
51.531
Total
4637.472
53
SE B
-12.17
2.34
-0.65
-5.19
0.00**
Year of Student
0.67
2.07
0.04
0.33
0.75
Logical Thinking
-0.22
0.31
-0.09
-0.70
0.49
Self-regulation
0.11
0.11
0.13
1.04
0.31
Interpersonal Intelligence
0.01
0.11
0.01
0.07
0.95
Notes R2 =
0.48; Adj. R2 =
0.42 (N=53,
**p= < 0.05)
APA Format
Report
A multiple linear regression was conducted to predict students learning achievement based on Type
of class, Year of students, Logical Thinking skill, self-regulation, and Interpersonal Intelligence. Using
the enter method it was found that Logical Thinking skill, self-regulation, and Interpersonal Intelligence
level explain a significant amount of the variance in the value of students achievement (F(5,47) =
8.60, p < 0.00), with an R2 of 0.48. The analysis shows that year of student (Beta = 0.67, t(53) = 0.33,
ns), logical thinking (Beta = -0.22, t(53) = -0.70, ns), self-regulation (Beta = 0.11, t(53) = 1.04, ns),
Interpersonal Intelligence (Beta = 0.01, t(53) = 0.07, ns) level did not significantly predict value of
students achievement. However Type of class did significantly predict value of students Achievement
(Beta = -12.17, t(53) = --5.19, p < 0.05).