Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2K views2 pages

Extrinsic and Intrinsic Evil

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 2

Extrinsic and intrinsic Evil

The relation of action to the norm of morality is either intrinsic or extrinsic. Something
is intrinsic to a thing when it is integral to the nature of that thing, The sweetness of a
mango fruit is. for example, intrinsic to it.
But the appeal of a mango to a particular person is extrinsic to it. That is such quality
not an integral element of it as a fruit.
Some actions are intrinsically evil because their nature is defective either by excess or
by lack of certain attributes.
Ex. Is the nature of stealing which. By nature, manifest lack of respect for the property
of another.
some other actions are extrinsically evil because certain factors attached them by the
circumstances render them oppose to the norm of morality.
Ex. Drinking liquor is extrinsically evil when done in excess.
Actions that are intrinsically evil are extremely prohibited at all times and under any
circumstances.
Actions that are extrinsically evil may be tolerated provided by the circumstance
rendering it to be wrong is first removed. Suicide is intrinsically evil and remains immoral
whatever is its justification.
Ex. Therapeutic abortion is extrinsically evil when it is resorted as a necessary to
safeguard the life of the mother.

Imputability of Human Acts


A human act is done by a person who is in control of his faculties. Intellect and will. In
this sense. A person is like the captian of a ship who assumes full responsibility for his
decisions.
The imputability of a human act means that the person performing the act is liable for
such act. It involves the notion of guilt or innocence. Thus, actions are either
praiseworthy or blameworthy. Actions are attributed to the doer as their principal cause.

You might also like