River Basin Management Plans: Ems, Meuse, Rhine Delta and Scheldt - A Summary
River Basin Management Plans: Ems, Meuse, Rhine Delta and Scheldt - A Summary
River Basin Management Plans: Ems, Meuse, Rhine Delta and Scheldt - A Summary
2009 - 2015
22 December 2009
8
8
9
10
10
10
10
11
Introduction
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
2
19
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
20
20
24
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
12
12
12
14
16
20
Introduction
The Ems river basin
The Meuse river basin
The Rhine delta river basin
The Scheldt river basin
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
24
24
26
26
Objectives
Realistic goals
Who sets the objectives?
When will the objectives be achieved?
27
27
27
29
30
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
Introduction
Basic and supplementary measures
The measures
Implementation
46
46
46
46
46
38
38
38
41
42
43
43
43
45
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Costs
7.3 Benefits
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
Implementation
KNMI climate scenarios
Expected effects of climate change
Climate change in the 2016 2021
river basin management plan
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
Implementation
Monitoring programme
The second river basin management
plan for the 2016 - 2021 period
More information?
Introduction
In 2000, the member states of the European Union adopted the Water Framework Directive, in
which they agreed that by 2015 (or, under strict conditions, as soon as possible) groundwater
and surface water will be of good quality. To that end, individual management plans are to be
formulated for each river basin, indicating the objectives for groundwater and surface waters,
and showing how quality can be maintained and, where necessary, improved.
River basin management plans have since been drawn up for the Dutch parts of each of the
international river basins of the Ems, Meuse, Rhine and Scheldt. As these plans elaborate and
substantiate policy choices in relation to the implementation of the Water Framework Directive in
The Netherlands, these plans are part of and must be considered in conjunction with the National
Water Plan. This document presents a summary of the four river basin management plans.
The formulation of these plans was preceded by a comprehensive and intensive preparatory
process. The national government, provincial authorities, water boards and municipal councils
jointly performed studies and analyses, set objectives and developed programmes of measures.
During the process, intensive consultation took place with interest groups at local, regional and
national level.
The first four river basin management plans took effect on 22 December 2009. Exactly one year
earlier (on 22 December 2008), the four draft river basin management plans were presented for
public consultation. The consultation period lasted six months, from 22 December 2008 until
21 June 2009. Once the results of the consultation rounds had been incorporated, the four plans
were adopted by the Dutch government.
1
For the Scheldt, this period was extended until 20 July 2009.
1.1
1.2
monitoring programme.
1.3
management plans.
1.4
10
2.1
Table 1 Number of bodies of surface and groundwater for the Dutch part of each river basin
River basin
Ems
Groundwater bodies
22
Table 2 Number of government bodies in the Netherlands involved in each river basin
Government body
Water boards
Rhine
Meuse
155
Provinces
Rhine
491
11
Municipal councils
56
724
23
Scheldt
Total
Meuse
18
Scheldt
Ems
10
305
121
20
24
forms of cooperation:
2.4
management authority with all other levels of government (see table 2) and immediate stakeholders taking
3 RWS
Rijkswaterstaat
11
12
3.1
Introduction
Another typically Dutch phenomenon is the largescale damming up of tidal outlets to protect the
3.2
Location
tidal action.
Spatial characteristics
of Groningen.
Protected areas
13
14
3.3
Location
human consumption.
hydrological regime.
consumption.
Protected areas
15
16
3.4
Location
is fully regulated.
basin.
construction of weirs.
Lower Saxony.
of nature areas.
Spatial characteristics
Protected areas
human consumption.
17
Figure 3
Boundaries of the Rhine delta work area, which comprises the Dutch part
of the Rhine delta river basin and the adjoining part in Germany
Location
rainfall.
Spatial characteristics
Protected areas
19
20
4.1
4.2
Physico-chemical pollution
the one out all out principle. This means that the
status score.
Figures 5 and 6.
management
a number of substances.
certain pesticides.
Figure 5 Final assessments of the chemical and ecological status of surface water bodies for
21
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
country.
Ems
Meuse
Rhine
Scheldt
The Netherlands
Of the physico-chemical parameters, high concentrations of nitrogen and phosphate are the greatest
problem. In Rhine and Ems, transparency is regularly
100%
80%
60%
40%
Satisfactory
20%
Unsatisfactory
0%
No data available
Ems
Meuse
Rhine
Scheldt
The Netherlands
22
Figure 6 Final assessments of the chemical and quantitative status of the groundwater bodies
for the separate river basins and for the Netherlands as a whole.
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
Ems
Meuse
Rhine
Scheldt
The Netherlands
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
Satisfactory
0%
Unsatisfactory
Ems
Meuse
Rhine
Scheldt
The Netherlands
23
24
5.1
Objectives
transparency;
5.2
Realistic goals
possible.
quantities.
shore zone;
modified.
25
Figure 7 Overview of the method of setting objectives for surface water and groundwater
Priority substances
Other existing
substances with
standards
at European level
ecologically
sound
Morphological
conditions /
hydromorphology
Specific
pollutants
Biology:
- algae
- water plants
- fish
- small aquatic animals
General
physico-chemical,
such as:
- transparency
- N, P
chemically
clean
sufficient
Nature
National
threshold values
Substances with
standards
at European level
Human use
Table 3
Number of surface water bodies (SWB) per river basin, for which extension
Table 4
Number of groundwater bodies (GWB) per river basin, for which extension
River basin
Number of
SWBs requiring
phasing
River basin
Percentage of
SWB phasing (%)
Total number
of GWBs
number of
GWBs requiring
phasing
Percentage of
GWB phasing (%)
22
18
82
Ems
50
Meuse
155
137
88
Meuse
40
Rhine
491
422
86
Rhine
11
27
Ems
Scheldt
Total
26
Total number
of SWBs
5.3
56
48
86
Scheldt
724
625
86
Total
5.4
20
23
35
not reach their objectives until after 2015 (see table 4).
6.1
Introduction
planning periods.
6.2
27
28
Licensing
The 2009 Decree on the quality requirements and monitoring of water (Bkmw 2009) stipulates
that, in adopting the water management plan and the provincial water or spatial plan, the
water management authorities and the provinces, respectively, take the environmental quality
requirements of the WFD into account. These plans should, therefore, indicate what measures
are being taken to meet these requirements. As regards chemical quality, current licensing
policy, including the emission-immission test for surface waters, and the existing general rules
remain the starting point for assessing point sources. By periodically upgrading the state of
the art in terms of best available technologies and best environmental practices taking into
account cost effectiveness and economic capacity of companies and sectors and applying
this in the source-oriented approach, total emissions and discharges in the management area
can be reduced, creating space for new activities and related emissions. In this way, economic
activities are disconnected from the resulting environmental impact in an attempt to achieve
environmental objectives. In the event of localised disproportionate growth of preferred
activities, the management plan in question will indicate how these activities are or can be
made compatible.
If water conditions are insufficient as a result of environmental impact from existing inputs
and these inputs cannot be reduced or not in time, this may mean that, for the time being,
no permits will be granted for new inputs. However, a permit may nevertheless be granted
if the activity for which a permit has been requested is of significant public interest and
if adequately limiting the new discharge or emission is technically not feasible or
disproportionally expensive now or in the near future. In that case, the plan must indicate
that the environmental quality requirement cannot be achieved and that the target must be
lowered. This will have to be thoroughly substantiated.
additional regulation.
Licensing and (generic) measures reduce the environmental impact on groundwater resulting from
demonstration.
6.3
The measures
pollutants
(2009-2015) include:
study (Nitraatonderzoek Mergelland) pays areaspecific attention to the problem of nitrate in the
29
30
schemes.
6.4
Implementation
first planning period (2009 2015) and for the next two
European Commission.
31
Table 5 Summary overview of the supplementary measures for the Dutch part of the Ems river basin for the 2010 - 2015 and 2016 - 2027 periods
32
Ems
RBMP
Name of measure
Unit
ha / no.
67 / 4
no.
ha
no.
no.
ha
15
km
ha
10
Removing weir
no.
no.
17
km
44
ha
113
ha / no.
2350 / 2
50 / -
km
64
53
ha
78
200
Other measures
Active vegetation- / water quality management
km / no.
41 / 1
Financial measures
no.
no.
Investigations
Conducting research
no.
76 / -
10
Table 6 Summary overview of the supplementary measures for the Dutch part of the Meuse river basin for the 2010 - 2015 and 2016 - 2027 periods
Meuse
RBMP
Name of measure
Unit
no. / year
9 / 24
no.
83
ha / no.
4/2
no.
12
13
ha / no.
332 / 3
118 / -
no.
no.
ha / m 3 / no.
1233 / 302000 / 1
ha / no.
1624 / 28
ha / km
62 / 697
60 / -
ha / km
264 / 6
296 / 11
no.
no.
no.
144
324
km
281
697
ha / no.
250 / 13
-/2
km / no.
17 / 19
29 / 48
no.
WB21 measures
ha
70
ha / km
18 / 385
- / 691
ha
10790
18823
33
34
Other measures
Construction of specific habitats for fish
km
63
no.
ha / km
47 / 702
no.
no.
ha / no.
3 / 21
Providing information
no.
47
no.
20
no.
28
ha / no.
3384 / 4
no.
no.
no.
141
66
12 / 39
Investigations
Conducting research
Table 7 Summary overview of the supplementary measures for the Dutch part of the Rhine river basin for the 2010 - 2015 and 2016 - 2027 periods
Rhine
RBMP
Name of measure
Unit
km / no.
2 / 355
- / 108
m 3 / no.
30 / 23
-/6
ha / km / no.
- / - / 252
2 / 14 / 7
no.
34
ha
93
no.
45
16
no.
616
no.
km
30
ha / km / m 3 / no.
2000 / 10 / 5567989 / 23
408 / 10 / 1957290 / -
no.
ha
174
no.
ha / km / no.
840 / 18 / 1
455 / 14 / -
ha / km / m
56 / 1 / 4000
- / 30 / 137727
ha / no.
1900 / 76
600 / 36
ha / no.
23671 / 31
20850 / 40
Removing weir
no.
28
no.
426
506
ha / km / no.
75 / 1292 / 7
185 / 2553 / -
ha / m / no.
1 / 94680 / 1
- / 164568 / -
ha / km / no.
6254 / 47 / 117
2418 / 89 / 154
ha / km / no.
- / 64 / 28
56 / 111 / 30
ha / km / no.
12 / 9 / 1
-/8/-
35
36
ha / km / no.
153 / 343 / 2
Adjusting (ground)waterlevel
no.
WB21 measure
ha / no.
737 / 499 / 24 / 1
Other measures
Construction of special habitats for fish
ha / km / no.
10 / - / 29
20 / 30 / 23
ha
228
ha / km / no.
948 / 978 / 3
467 / 1796 / 3
ha / no.
103489 / 23
94970 / 12
ha / km / no.
116 / 1913 / 9
- / 55 / 17
ha / no.
332 / 1
59 / 1
Financial measures
no.
Providing information
no.
17
ha / no.
11 / 3
127 / 7
no.
12
ha / no.
100 / 9
-/2
ha / km / no.
20 / 66 / 1
13 / - / -
no.
no.
no.
no.
864
328
Investigations
Conducting research
Table 8 Summary overview of the supplementary measures for the Dutch part of the Scheldt river basin for the 2010 - 2015 and 2016 - 2027 periods
Scheldt
RBMP
Name of measure
Unit
year
no.
no.
ha
27
km
94
no.
no.
41
50
km
117
138
ha / no.
57 / 3
-/1
km
14
21
ha
137
232
km
ha
26
ha
111
no.
Providing information
no.
no.
no.
ha
6749
no.
12
Other measures
Investigations
Conducting research
121
10
37
7.1
Introduction
7.2
Costs
Directive.
opted for.
planning period.
39
(x million )
Ems
Meuse
Rhine
Scheldt
Total
2010-2015 period
149
503
1.502
74
2.228
2016-2027 period
119
780
1.076
27
2.002
Total
268
1.283
2.578
101
4.230
Scheldt
Total
(x million )
Meuse
Ems
Rhine
9
9
594
43
110
441
40
251
303
91
297
688
35
1.111
Supplementary measures
47
60
26
142
Conducting research
53
69
149
503
1.502
74
2.228
Total
40
Figure 8
Percentage of water bodies per river basin to reach biological parameter objectives in 2015
Goal attainment 2015 Ems
Phytoplankton
Phytoplankton
Macrofauna
Macrofauna
Fish
Fish
Total P
Total P
Total N
Total N
Transparency
Transparency
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Phytoplankton
Phytoplankton
Macrofauna
Macrofauna
Fish
Fish
Total P
Total P
Total N
Total N
Transparency
Transparency
% No goal attainment
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
% Goal attainment
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
7.3
Benefits
upstream.
management plans;
41
Source: www.knmi.nl/klimaatscenarios/
Airflow patterns
changed
G+
+ 1C
W+
Global temperature
+ 2C
42
unchanged
Table 11 Estimate of the sensitivity of water types to impact related to climate change
Watertypes
Still waters
(lakes)
Flowing waters
(rivers)
Coastal waters
Transitional
waters
Groundwater
Impact
Eutrophication
Salinisation
Regulation of water level
(fluctuations)
Discharge dynamics
Connectivity
Thermal load
negligible
8.1
Introduction
8.2
8.3
patterns (G)
Moderate scenario with changed airflow patterns
(G+)
(W+)
of distribution of species.
impact.
43
44
8.4
of the measure.
45
46
9.1
Implementation
9.4
www.kaderrichtlijnwater.nl and
at the latest.
More information
47
48
Publication information
This is a joint publication of the Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management,
the Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment and the Ministry of Agriculture,
Nature and Food Quality.
For more information about the river basin management plans and the National Water Plan,
see www.kaderrichtlijnwater.nl, www.nationaalwaterplan.nl and Nederlandleeftmetwater.nl.
You can also download a PDF version here.
If you would like to receive a hardcopy of this document, please contact the Helpdesk Water
on 0800-659 28 37 or contact@helpdeskwater.nl.
No rights can be derived from this document.
Text editing
Projectteam stroomgebiedbeheerplannen
Design
CO3 (www.co3.org)
Photografy
Printing
Thieme Deventer
22 December 2009