Design Guidance Hydroplaning
Design Guidance Hydroplaning
Design Guidance Hydroplaning
HydroplaningRiskAnalysis
Introduction
ThisdocumentprovidesguidanceontheanalysisofhydroplaningriskassessmentusingtheHPprogram
releasedinMay2014,andonestimatingexpecteddriverspeedduringrainfallevents.
Qualitativeresultsfromthe2012FloridaGulfCoastUniversity,EvaluationofDriverBehaviorto
HydroplaningintheStateofFloridaUsingDriveSimulation,wereusedtocorrelatestormintensitytoa
predictedspeedreductionduringwetweatherroadwayconditions.Thestudyinvolvedexamining
driverresponsetorainfallinbothadrivingsimulatorandusingrainfall/fieldspeeddatafromlimited
accessfreewaysacrossFlorida.Thestudyshowsthatduringlightrainevents(0.010.24in/hr)driver
speedsarerelativelyunaffected.Heavyrainfall(>0.25in/hr)causesdriverstoslowdownbetween6to
12mph.
HPcomputersoftwareisahydroplaningassessmenttooldevelopedbyFDOTandUniversityofSouth
Florida.Theprogramisavailablefordownloadat
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/Drainage/ManualsandHandbooks.shtm,andhastwocomponents:
1. Amethodologytopredictwaterfilmthickness(WFT)onthepavementbeinganalyzed;and
2. AmethodologytopredictpotentialhydroplaningspeedgiventheWFTdetermined
HPoffersfourdifferentformulasforcalculatingtheWFTandthreedifferentformulasforpredictingthe
potentialhydroplaningspeed.TherecommendedHPoptions(theGallawayformulaforWFTtogether
withthePAVDRNformulaforpotentialhydroplaningspeedprediction)producewhathasbeenfoundto
bethebestpredictorofFloridaswetweathercrashdata.
ThePAVDRNcalculationsarebasedontestingperformedatatirepressureof24psiandthepavement
characteristicsbelow:
Sources:
EvaluationofDriverBehaviortoHydroplaningintheStateofFloridaUsingDriverSimulation,2012,
FloridaGulfCoastUniversity.
HydroplaningonMultilaneFacilities,2012,UniversityofSouthFlorida
TRBPaper145288,2013,EvaluationofWidelyUsedHydroplaningRiskPredictionMethodsUsing
Florida'sPastCrashData
HydroplaningEvaluationProcedure
Step1
Estimatethepredicteddriverspeedduringrainfalleventsfrom0to4inchesperhourusingTable1,
below.Table1speedreductionsshouldbeappliedtothedesignspeedforthelistedintensities.
Table1:PredictedDriverResponse
Predicted
Intensity Speed PredictedDriver
(in/hr) Reduction1 Speed(mph)
(mph)
0.1 0 DesignSpeed0
0.25 0 DesignSpeed0
0.5 6 DesignSpeed6
1 8 DesignSpeed8
2 12 DesignSpeed12
3 Assumed45
4 Assumed45
1:PredictedspeedreductionstakenfromContractStudy
BDQ22performedbyGulfCoastUniversity.Highintensity
speedreductionsarenotknown;therefore45mphwas
conservativelyestimated.
Step2
UseHPtocalculatethewaterfilmthickness(WFT).
a. Entertherainfallintensityininches/hour.Sincepermeabilityisameasureofstormwater
passingthroughthepavementintotheground,leavethepermeabilitysettozero,sincethe
imperviousasphaltsurfaceunderthefrictioncoursepreventsdischargeofstormwaterinto
theground.
b. DefinethegeometricalpropertiesoftheroadwayintheLaneGeometrysection.
1) Waterfilmthicknessequationshavebeendevelopedbasedonfreeflowoverporous
homogeneous(havingaconstantslopeinanydirectionandconstructedofthesame
material)surfaces.Therefore,themostaccurateestimatesofwaterfilmthickness
(WFT)canbeobtainedbycombininglanesalongthepavementcrosssectionand
inputtingtheslopedatafortheoutermostlane.Forexample,insteadofcoding212
ft.lanesat0.02ft/ftcrossslopeand112ft.laneata0.03ft/ftslope,groupthelanes
andcodeas136ft.laneat0.03ft/ft.Thetotalwidthofthepavementwillaccountfor
themassofwatertravellingacrossthesectionandtheoutermostlanescrossslope
definestheflowdynamics.
2) Roadwaylongitudinalslopeaddstotheflowlength,increasingtheWFT,andlowering
thepotentialhydroplaningspeed.Therefore,enterthesteepestlongitudinalslope
expectedtooccurwithinthesectionofpavementbeinganalyzed.
c. Select the type of pavement from the Pavement Surface Material section. The program
automaticallyprovidesadefaultvaluesforthemeantexturedepth(MTD).
PCC:Portlandcementconcrete;MTD=0.010.044in
DGAC:Densegradedasphalticconcrete;MTD=0.0090.065in
OGAC:Opengradedorporousasphalticconcrete;MTD=0.040.161in
d. ProceedandclicktheCalculateWaterFilmThicknessbutton.Therecommendedmethodis
theGallawayformula.
Gallaway Equation
TheHPprogramcalculatestheWFTusingfourdifferentequations,theresultsofwhicharedisplayed,
alongwiththeformulaname,directlybelowtheCalculateWaterFilmThicknessbutton.Ensurethe
GallawayEquationisthemethodselectedforcalculatingWFT.
Step3
UseHPsoftwaretocalculatethePotentialHydroplaningSpeed.
a. Atthispoint,theuserhascalculatedtheWFT(usingtheGallawayEquation)andtheoutermost
lane water film thickness is displayed in the box labeled WFT selected. Because the Gallaway
EquationcalculatesthehighestWFT,theusercandoublecheckthatthecorrectfilmthicknessis
being used for the formula selected, by clicking on the WFT Variation or Highest WFT plot
buttonatthebottomofthedialogueboxandverifyingtheWFTresults.
b. The PAVDRN formula is recommended for calculating the predicted hydroplaning speed for
projectswithinFlorida.ThePAVDRNformulaforcalculatingHydroplaningSpeedhaspresettire
pressureandwheelloadsofthevehicle;thereforethesevariablesarenotenteredbytheuser.
ProceedtothefinalstepbyclickingtheCalculateHydroplaningSpeedbutton.
PAVDRN Equation
For water film thicknesses less than 0.1 inches,
v p 26.04t 0.259
Where, A is the greater of the values calculated using the following expressions
10.409 28.952
t 0.06 3.507 t 0.06 7.817( MTD)
0.14
or
vp = Hydroplaning speed (mph),
t = Water film thickness (in)
MTD = macro-texture depth (mm) (multiply inches by 25.4 to convert to mm).
TheHPprogramallowstheusertocalculatetheHydroplaningSpeedusingthreedifferentformulas.The
resultsofwhicharedisplayed,alongwiththeformulaname,directlybelowtheCalculateHydroplaning
Speedbutton.Notethereportedhydroplaningspeedisfortheoutermostlane,wherethewaterfilm
isthethickest.SelectthePAVDRNmethodologyforcalculatingthehydroplaningspeed.
Step4
Thelaststepistocomparethepredictedhydroplaningspeedtothepredicteddriverspeedtoseeif
thereisariskofhydroplaningforthesectionofroadway.Laneswherethepredicteddriversspeedis
greaterthanorequaltothehydroplaningspeedshouldbenotedandconsideredinthepotential
correctiveactionbenefit/costevaluationforthechosentypicalsection.
SampleProblem
Analyzeaproposedtypicalsectionwithtwo12ftlanesslopedat2percentandtwo12ftlanesata3
percentslopedtotheoutside.TheDistricthasrequestedthatahydroplaninganalysisbeperformed,
sincethissectionhasbeenproposedwithadesignspeedof70mphandSection2.1.5.1ofthePPM
requiresthatthedesignspeedbelessthanorequalto65mph.Themaximumlongitudinalslopeonthe
projectis1%.
1. TypicalsectiondesigndataisenteredintotheHPprograminterfaceforeachrainfallevent,as
illustratedbelowfora2/hrrainfall.Designdataincludesalongitudinalslopeof1percentand
thepavementtypeisopengradedfrictioncourse.
Note:Theentiresectionisenteredunderpavementwidthtoaccountforthevolumeofrunoff,
butonlytheoutermostlanecrossslopeisenteredtocharacterizetheflowhydraulics.
2. SelecttheGallawayEquationforcalculatingWFTandclicktheCalculateWaterFilmThickness
button.Then,clicktheCalculateHydroplaningSpeedbuttonandselectthevalueshownonthe
PAVDRNEq.box.EnterthepredictedspeedintoTable1below,whichisanexcerptfromthe
spreadsheetavailableontheDrainagewebsite,
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/Drainage/ManualsandHandbooks.shtm.Repeatthe
processwithdifferentrainfallintensitiesuntilthetableisfullypopulated.Typically,the2/hr
intensityisthemostcritical.Forlowerrainfallintensities,theWFTcanbenegative,indicating
thatthepavementwaterisbelowthetopofthepavement.Insuchcases,theprogramwill
reportanegativeWFTbutinternallyuseaWFTjustgreaterthanzerotocalculatethepredicted
hydroplaningspeed;fortheselowWFTs,alargehydroplaningspeedwillresultwhichindicates
hydroplaningisnotaconcern.
3. ThepredictedspeedreductionsfromTable1aresubtractedfromthedesignspeedtoestimate
thepredicteddriversspeed.Ifthehydroplaningspeedislessthanorequalto,thenthecellis
highlightedasanareaofconcern;resultsaretabulatedinthespreadsheetbelow:
Rainfall
Intensity PredictedDriver
(in/hr) Lane1 Lane2 Lane3 Lane4 Speed(mph)
0.1 n/a 70
0.25 n/a 70
0.5 n/a 64
1 83 62
2 58 58
3 51 45
4 48 45
Noteabove,thatforonlyonerainfallintensity,thepredicteddriversspeedsequalsthespeedat
whichhydroplaningcouldoccur.Forthisoccurrence,thecostsavingsassociatedwiththe
proposedtypicalsectionmightjustifytheacceptanceofahydroplaningrisk.Prudent
investigationintodriverbehaviorandcrashhistoryoftheroadshouldbefactoredintothe
decisionmakingprocess.Thedecisiontoallowthesectionandaccepttheriskwouldneedtobe
supportedbytheDistrictthroughthedesignvariationprocess.