Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
79 views8 pages

Design Guidance Hydroplaning

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 8

DesignGuidance:

HydroplaningRiskAnalysis
Introduction
ThisdocumentprovidesguidanceontheanalysisofhydroplaningriskassessmentusingtheHPprogram
releasedinMay2014,andonestimatingexpecteddriverspeedduringrainfallevents.

Qualitativeresultsfromthe2012FloridaGulfCoastUniversity,EvaluationofDriverBehaviorto
HydroplaningintheStateofFloridaUsingDriveSimulation,wereusedtocorrelatestormintensitytoa
predictedspeedreductionduringwetweatherroadwayconditions.Thestudyinvolvedexamining
driverresponsetorainfallinbothadrivingsimulatorandusingrainfall/fieldspeeddatafromlimited
accessfreewaysacrossFlorida.Thestudyshowsthatduringlightrainevents(0.010.24in/hr)driver
speedsarerelativelyunaffected.Heavyrainfall(>0.25in/hr)causesdriverstoslowdownbetween6to
12mph.

HPcomputersoftwareisahydroplaningassessmenttooldevelopedbyFDOTandUniversityofSouth
Florida.Theprogramisavailablefordownloadat
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/Drainage/ManualsandHandbooks.shtm,andhastwocomponents:

1. Amethodologytopredictwaterfilmthickness(WFT)onthepavementbeinganalyzed;and
2. AmethodologytopredictpotentialhydroplaningspeedgiventheWFTdetermined

HPoffersfourdifferentformulasforcalculatingtheWFTandthreedifferentformulasforpredictingthe
potentialhydroplaningspeed.TherecommendedHPoptions(theGallawayformulaforWFTtogether
withthePAVDRNformulaforpotentialhydroplaningspeedprediction)producewhathasbeenfoundto
bethebestpredictorofFloridaswetweathercrashdata.

ThePAVDRNcalculationsarebasedontestingperformedatatirepressureof24psiandthepavement
characteristicsbelow:

PavementType MTD(mm) Manningsn


PCC 0.91 0.031
DGAC 0.91 0.0327
OGAC 1.5 0.0355

Sources:
EvaluationofDriverBehaviortoHydroplaningintheStateofFloridaUsingDriverSimulation,2012,
FloridaGulfCoastUniversity.
HydroplaningonMultilaneFacilities,2012,UniversityofSouthFlorida
TRBPaper145288,2013,EvaluationofWidelyUsedHydroplaningRiskPredictionMethodsUsing
Florida'sPastCrashData

HydroplaningEvaluationProcedure
Step1

Estimatethepredicteddriverspeedduringrainfalleventsfrom0to4inchesperhourusingTable1,
below.Table1speedreductionsshouldbeappliedtothedesignspeedforthelistedintensities.

Table1:PredictedDriverResponse

Predicted
Intensity Speed PredictedDriver
(in/hr) Reduction1 Speed(mph)
(mph)

0.1 0 DesignSpeed0

0.25 0 DesignSpeed0

0.5 6 DesignSpeed6

1 8 DesignSpeed8

2 12 DesignSpeed12

3 Assumed45

4 Assumed45

1:PredictedspeedreductionstakenfromContractStudy
BDQ22performedbyGulfCoastUniversity.Highintensity
speedreductionsarenotknown;therefore45mphwas
conservativelyestimated.

Step2

UseHPtocalculatethewaterfilmthickness(WFT).

a. Entertherainfallintensityininches/hour.Sincepermeabilityisameasureofstormwater
passingthroughthepavementintotheground,leavethepermeabilitysettozero,sincethe
imperviousasphaltsurfaceunderthefrictioncoursepreventsdischargeofstormwaterinto
theground.
b. DefinethegeometricalpropertiesoftheroadwayintheLaneGeometrysection.
1) Waterfilmthicknessequationshavebeendevelopedbasedonfreeflowoverporous
homogeneous(havingaconstantslopeinanydirectionandconstructedofthesame
material)surfaces.Therefore,themostaccurateestimatesofwaterfilmthickness
(WFT)canbeobtainedbycombininglanesalongthepavementcrosssectionand
inputtingtheslopedatafortheoutermostlane.Forexample,insteadofcoding212
ft.lanesat0.02ft/ftcrossslopeand112ft.laneata0.03ft/ftslope,groupthelanes
andcodeas136ft.laneat0.03ft/ft.Thetotalwidthofthepavementwillaccountfor
themassofwatertravellingacrossthesectionandtheoutermostlanescrossslope
definestheflowdynamics.
2) Roadwaylongitudinalslopeaddstotheflowlength,increasingtheWFT,andlowering
thepotentialhydroplaningspeed.Therefore,enterthesteepestlongitudinalslope
expectedtooccurwithinthesectionofpavementbeinganalyzed.

c. Select the type of pavement from the Pavement Surface Material section. The program
automaticallyprovidesadefaultvaluesforthemeantexturedepth(MTD).
PCC:Portlandcementconcrete;MTD=0.010.044in
DGAC:Densegradedasphalticconcrete;MTD=0.0090.065in
OGAC:Opengradedorporousasphalticconcrete;MTD=0.040.161in
d. ProceedandclicktheCalculateWaterFilmThicknessbutton.Therecommendedmethodis
theGallawayformula.
Gallaway Equation

0.003726 L0.519 I 0.562 MTD 0.125


t MTD
S 0.364

t = Water film thickness (in)


L = Plane length of flow path (ft)
I = Rainfall intensity (in/h)
MTD = Mean texture depth (in)
S = Pavement slope (ft/ft)

TheHPprogramcalculatestheWFTusingfourdifferentequations,theresultsofwhicharedisplayed,
alongwiththeformulaname,directlybelowtheCalculateWaterFilmThicknessbutton.Ensurethe
GallawayEquationisthemethodselectedforcalculatingWFT.

Step3

UseHPsoftwaretocalculatethePotentialHydroplaningSpeed.

a. Atthispoint,theuserhascalculatedtheWFT(usingtheGallawayEquation)andtheoutermost
lane water film thickness is displayed in the box labeled WFT selected. Because the Gallaway
EquationcalculatesthehighestWFT,theusercandoublecheckthatthecorrectfilmthicknessis
being used for the formula selected, by clicking on the WFT Variation or Highest WFT plot
buttonatthebottomofthedialogueboxandverifyingtheWFTresults.

b. The PAVDRN formula is recommended for calculating the predicted hydroplaning speed for
projectswithinFlorida.ThePAVDRNformulaforcalculatingHydroplaningSpeedhaspresettire
pressureandwheelloadsofthevehicle;thereforethesevariablesarenotenteredbytheuser.
ProceedtothefinalstepbyclickingtheCalculateHydroplaningSpeedbutton.

PAVDRN Equation

For water film thicknesses less than 0.1 inches,
v p 26.04t 0.259

For water film thicknesses greater than or equal to 0.1 inches,


v p 3.09 A

Where, A is the greater of the values calculated using the following expressions
10.409 28.952
t 0.06 3.507 t 0.06 7.817( MTD)
0.14
or


vp = Hydroplaning speed (mph),
t = Water film thickness (in)
MTD = macro-texture depth (mm) (multiply inches by 25.4 to convert to mm).

TheHPprogramallowstheusertocalculatetheHydroplaningSpeedusingthreedifferentformulas.The
resultsofwhicharedisplayed,alongwiththeformulaname,directlybelowtheCalculateHydroplaning
Speedbutton.Notethereportedhydroplaningspeedisfortheoutermostlane,wherethewaterfilm
isthethickest.SelectthePAVDRNmethodologyforcalculatingthehydroplaningspeed.

Step4

Thelaststepistocomparethepredictedhydroplaningspeedtothepredicteddriverspeedtoseeif
thereisariskofhydroplaningforthesectionofroadway.Laneswherethepredicteddriversspeedis
greaterthanorequaltothehydroplaningspeedshouldbenotedandconsideredinthepotential
correctiveactionbenefit/costevaluationforthechosentypicalsection.

SampleProblem
Analyzeaproposedtypicalsectionwithtwo12ftlanesslopedat2percentandtwo12ftlanesata3
percentslopedtotheoutside.TheDistricthasrequestedthatahydroplaninganalysisbeperformed,
sincethissectionhasbeenproposedwithadesignspeedof70mphandSection2.1.5.1ofthePPM
requiresthatthedesignspeedbelessthanorequalto65mph.Themaximumlongitudinalslopeonthe
projectis1%.

1. TypicalsectiondesigndataisenteredintotheHPprograminterfaceforeachrainfallevent,as
illustratedbelowfora2/hrrainfall.Designdataincludesalongitudinalslopeof1percentand
thepavementtypeisopengradedfrictioncourse.

Note:Theentiresectionisenteredunderpavementwidthtoaccountforthevolumeofrunoff,
butonlytheoutermostlanecrossslopeisenteredtocharacterizetheflowhydraulics.

2. SelecttheGallawayEquationforcalculatingWFTandclicktheCalculateWaterFilmThickness
button.Then,clicktheCalculateHydroplaningSpeedbuttonandselectthevalueshownonthe
PAVDRNEq.box.EnterthepredictedspeedintoTable1below,whichisanexcerptfromthe
spreadsheetavailableontheDrainagewebsite,
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/Drainage/ManualsandHandbooks.shtm.Repeatthe
processwithdifferentrainfallintensitiesuntilthetableisfullypopulated.Typically,the2/hr
intensityisthemostcritical.Forlowerrainfallintensities,theWFTcanbenegative,indicating
thatthepavementwaterisbelowthetopofthepavement.Insuchcases,theprogramwill
reportanegativeWFTbutinternallyuseaWFTjustgreaterthanzerotocalculatethepredicted
hydroplaningspeed;fortheselowWFTs,alargehydroplaningspeedwillresultwhichindicates
hydroplaningisnotaconcern.

3. ThepredictedspeedreductionsfromTable1aresubtractedfromthedesignspeedtoestimate
thepredicteddriversspeed.Ifthehydroplaningspeedislessthanorequalto,thenthecellis
highlightedasanareaofconcern;resultsaretabulatedinthespreadsheetbelow:

Crossslope 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03

Rainfall
Intensity PredictedDriver
(in/hr) Lane1 Lane2 Lane3 Lane4 Speed(mph)

0.1 n/a 70
0.25 n/a 70

0.5 n/a 64
1 83 62
2 58 58

3 51 45

4 48 45

Noteabove,thatforonlyonerainfallintensity,thepredicteddriversspeedsequalsthespeedat
whichhydroplaningcouldoccur.Forthisoccurrence,thecostsavingsassociatedwiththe
proposedtypicalsectionmightjustifytheacceptanceofahydroplaningrisk.Prudent
investigationintodriverbehaviorandcrashhistoryoftheroadshouldbefactoredintothe
decisionmakingprocess.Thedecisiontoallowthesectionandaccepttheriskwouldneedtobe
supportedbytheDistrictthroughthedesignvariationprocess.

You might also like