Adamodar Mkttiming
Adamodar Mkttiming
Adamodar Mkttiming
Market Timing"
Aswath Damodaran
Aswath Damodaran! 1!
The Payoff to Market Timing"
Aswath Damodaran! 2!
The Cost of Market Timing"
In the process of switching from stocks to cash and back, you may miss the
best years of the market. In his article on market timing in 1975, Bill Sharpe
suggested that unless you can tell a good year from a bad year 7 times out of
10, you should not try market timing. This result is confirmed by Chua,
Woodward and To, who use Monte Carlo simulations on the Canadian market
and confirm you have to be right 70-80% of the time to break even from
market timing.
These studies do not consider the additional transactions costs that inevitably
flow from market timing strategies, since you will trade far more extensively
with these strategies. At the limit, a stock/cash switching strategy will mean
that you will have to liquidate your entire equity portfolio if you decide to
switch into cash and start from scratch again the next time you want to be in
stocks.
A market timing strategy will also increase your potential tax liabilities. You
will have to pay capital gains taxes when you sell your stocks, and over your
lifetime as an investor, you will pay far more in taxes.
Aswath Damodaran! 3!
Market Timing Approaches"
Aswath Damodaran! 4!
I. Non-financial Indicators"
Spurious indicators that may seem to be correlated with the market but
have no rational basis.
Feel good indicators that measure how happy are feeling - presumably,
happier individuals will bid up higher stock prices.
Hype indicators that measure whether there is a stock price bubble.
Aswath Damodaran! 5!
1. Spurious Indicators"
There are a number of indicators such as who wins the Super Bowl
that claim to predict stock market movements.
There are three problems with these indicators:
We disagree that chance cannot explain this phenomenon. When you have
hundreds of potential indicators that you can use to time markets, there
will be some that show an unusually high correlation purely by chance.
A forecast of market direction (up or down) does not really qualify as
market timing, since how much the market goes up clearly does make a
difference.
You should always be cautious when you can find no economic link
between a market timing indicator and the market.
Aswath Damodaran! 6!
2. Feel Good Indicators"
When people feel optimistic about the future, it is not just stock prices
that are affected by this optimism. Often, there are social
consequences as well, with styles and social mores affected by the fact
that investors and consumers feel good about the economy.
It is not surprising, therefore, that people have discovered linkages
between social indicators and Wall Street. You should expect to see a
high correlation between demand at highly priced restaurants at New
York City (or wherever young investment bankers and traders go) and
the market.
The problem with feel good indicators, in general, is that they tend to
be contemporaneous or lagging rather than leading indicators.
Aswath Damodaran! 7!
3. Hype Indicators"
An example: The cocktail party chatter indicator tracks three measures the
time elapsed at a party before talk turns to stocks, the average age of the
people discussing stocks and the fad component of the chatter. According to
the indicator, the less time it takes for the talk to turn to stocks, the lower the
average age of the market discussants and the greater the fad component, the
more negative you should be about future stock price movements.
As investors increasingly turn to social media, researchers are probing the data
that is coming from these forums to see if they can used to get a sense of
market mood. A study of ten million tweets in 2008 found that a relationship
between the collective mood on the tweets predicted stock price movements.
There are limitations with these indicators
Defining what constitutes abnormal can be tricky in a world where standards and
tastes are shifting.
Even if we decide that there is an abnormally high interest in the market today and
you conclude (based upon the hype indicators) that stocks are over valued, there is
no guarantee that stocks will not get more overvalued before the correction occurs.
Aswath Damodaran! 8!
II. Technical Indicators"
Past prices
Price reversals or momentum
The January Indicator
Trading Volume
Market Volatility
Other price and sentiment indicators
Aswath Damodaran! 9!
1a. Past Prices: Does the past hold signs for
the future?"
As January goes, so goes the year if stocks are up, the market will be
up for the year, but a bad beginning usually precedes a poor year.
According to the venerable Stock Traders Almanac that is compiled
every year by Yale Hirsch, this indicator has worked 88% of the time.
Note, though that if you exclude January from the years returns and
compute the returns over the remaining 11 months of the year, the
signal becomes much weaker and returns are negative only 50% of the
time after a bad start in January. Thus, selling your stocks after stocks
have gone down in January may not protect you from poor returns.
Price increases that occur without much trading volume are viewed as less
likely to carry over into the next trading period than those that are
accompanied by heavy volume.
At the same time, very heavy volume can also indicate turning points in
markets. For instance, a drop in the index with very heavy trading volume is
called a selling climax and may be viewed as a sign that the market has hit
bottom. This supposedly removes most of the bearish investors from the mix,
opening the market up presumably to more optimistic investors. On the other
hand, an increase in the index accompanied by heavy trading volume may be
viewed as a sign that market has topped out.
Another widely used indicator looks at the trading volume on puts as a ratio of
the trading volume on calls. This ratio, which is called the put-call ratio is
often used as a contrarian indicator. When investors become more bearish,
they sell more puts and this (as the contrarian argument goes) is a good sign
for the future of the market.
Money flow is the difference between uptick volume and downtick volume, as
predictor of market movements. An increase in the money flow is viewed as a
positive signal for future market movements whereas a decrease is viewed as a
bearish signal.
Using daily money flows from July 1997 to June 1998, Bennett and Sias find
that money flow is highly correlated with returns in the same period, which is
not surprising. While they find no predictive ability with short period returns
five day returns are not correlated with money flow in the previous five days
they do find some predictive ability for longer periods. With 40-day returns
and money flow over the prior 40 days, for instance, there is a link between
high money flow and positive stock returns.
Chan, Hameed and Tong extend this analysis to global equity markets. They
find that equity markets show momentum markets that have done well in the
recent past are more likely to continue doing well,, whereas markets that have
done badly remain poor performers. However, they find that the momentum
effect is stronger for equity markets that have high trading volume and weaker
in markets with low trading volume.
2.00%
1.50%
1.00%
0.50%
0.00%
Volatility Inceases
-0.50%
Volatility Decreases
-1.00%
-1.50%
-2.00%
-2.50%
-3.00%
In period of change In period after
Return on Market
These approaches are based upon the assumption that assets have a
normal range that they trade at, and that any deviation from the normal
range is an indication that assets are mispriced.
With stocks, the normal range is defined in terms of PE ratios.
With bonds, the normal range is defined in terms of interest rates.
Using treasury bond rates from 1970 to 1995 and regressing the change in
interest rates ( Interest Ratet) in each year against the level of rates at the end
of the prior year (Interest Ratet-1), we arrive at the following results:
Interest Ratet = 0.0139 - 0.1456 Interest Ratet-1
R2=.0728
(1.29)
(1.81)
This regression suggests two things. One is that the change in interest rates in this period is
negatively correlated with the level of rates at the end of the prior year; if rates were
high (low), they were more likely to decrease (increase). Second, for every 1% increase
in the level of current rates, the expected drop in interest rates in the next period
increases by 0.1456%.
Over time, a number of rules of thumb have been devised that relate
stock returns to the level of interest rates or the strength of the
economy.
For instance, we are often told that it is best to buy stocks when
Treasury bill rates are low
Treasury bond rates have dropped
GNP growth is strong
On January 1, 2011, the S&P 500 was trading at 1257.64 and the
dividends plus buybacks on the index amounted to 53.96 over the
previous year.
On the same date, analysts were estimating an expected growth rate of
6.95% in earnings for the index for the following five years. Beyond
year 5, the expected growth rate is expected to be 3.29%, the nominal
growth rate in the economy (set equal to the risk free rate).
The treasury bond rate was 3.29% and we will use a market risk
premium of 5%, leading to a cost of equity of 8.29%. (The beta for the
S&P 500 is assumed to be one)
We begin by projecting the cash flows on the index, growing the cash
flow (53.96) at 6.95% each year for the next 5 years.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Expected Dividends
plus buybacks= $57.72 $61.73 $66.02 $70.60 $75.51
In relative value models, you examine how markets are priced relative
to other markets and to fundamentals.
While it shares some characteristics with intrinsic valuation models,
this approach is less rigid, insofar as it does not require that you work
within the structure of a discounted cashflow model.
Instead, you either make comparisons of markets over time (the S&P
in 2010 versus the S&P in 1990) or different markets at the same point
in time (U.S. stocks in 2010 versus European stocks in 2002).
This strong positive relationship between E/P ratios and T.Bond rates is
evidenced by the correlation of 0.6854 between the two variables. In addition,
there is evidence that the term structure also affects the E/P ratio.
In the following regression, we regress E/P ratios against the level of T.Bond
rates and the yield spread (T.Bond - T.Bill rate), using data from 1960 to 2010.
E/P = 0.0266 + 0.6746 T.Bond Rate - 0.3131 (T.Bond Rate-T.Bill Rate)
R2 = 0.476
(3.37)
(6.41)
(-1.36)
We can use the regression to predict E/P ratio in November 2011, with
the T.Bill rate at 0.2% and the T.Bond rate at 2.2%.
E/P2011 = 0.0266 + 0.6746 (.022) - 0.3131 (.022- .02)
= 0.0408 or 4.08%
PE = 1 =
1
= 24.50
E/P2011 0.0408
18.00%
16.00%
14.00%
12.00%
Average Annual Returns
10.00%
1989-1998
1994-1998
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
S & P 500 Couch Potato 50/50 Couch Potato 75/25 Asset Allocation
Type of Fund
There are some investment strategies that do well in bull markets and
others that do better in bear markets. If you can identify when markets
are overvalued or undervalued, you could shift from one strategy to
another or even from one investment philosophy to another just in time
for a market shift.
Growth and small cap investing do better when growth is low and
when the yield curve is downward sloping.
Kao and Shumaker estimate the returns an investor would have made
if she had switched with perfect foresight from 1979 to 1997 from
value to growth stocks and back for both small cap and large cap
stocks. The annual returns from a perfect foresight strategy each year
would have been 20.86% for large cap stocks and 27.30% for small
cap stocks. In contrast, the annual return across all stocks was only
10.33% over the period.
The most direct way to take advantage of your market timing abilities
is to buy assets in a market that you believe is under valued and sell
assets in one that you believe is over valued.
It is a high risk, high return strategy. If you are successful, you will
earn an immense amount of money. If you are wrong, you could lose it
all.
You can be both a market timer and security selector. The same beliefs
about markets that led you to become a security selector may also lead
you to become a market timer. In fact, there are many investors who
combine asset allocation and security selection in a coherent
investment strategy.
There are, however, two caveats to an investment philosophy that
includes this combination.
To the extent that you have differing skills as a market timer and as a
security selector, you have to gauge where your differential advantage
lies, since you have limited time and resources to direct towards your task
of building a portfolio.
You may find that your attempts at market timing are under cutting your
asset selection and that your overall returns suffer as a consequence. If
this is the case, you should abandon market timing and focus exclusively
on security selection.