Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 129 views

    Cagas vs. Comelec

    Uploaded by

    Christian Roque
    The COMELEC decided to hold the plebiscite for creating the province of Davao Occidental simultaneously with the October 28, 2013 Barangay Elections to save expenses. Petitioner Cagas argued this was unconstitutional as only Congress can amend the requirement in the law for the plebiscite to be held within 60 days. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, finding that the COMELEC acted within its constitutional power to enforce election laws and that holding the plebiscite so close to the May 2013 national elections was logistically and financially impossible. Synchronizing the plebiscite with the Barangay Elections was a justified decision that did not constitute grave abuse of discretion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Cagas vs. Comelec

    Uploaded by

    Christian Roque
    129 views2 pages
    The COMELEC decided to hold the plebiscite for creating the province of Davao Occidental simultaneously with the October 28, 2013 Barangay Elections to save expenses. Petitioner Cagas argued this was unconstitutional as only Congress can amend the requirement in the law for the plebiscite to be held within 60 days. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, finding that the COMELEC acted within its constitutional power to enforce election laws and that holding the plebiscite so close to the May 2013 national elections was logistically and financially impossible. Synchronizing the plebiscite with the Barangay Elections was a justified decision that did not constitute grave abuse of discretion.

    Original Description:

    Cagas vs. Comelec Digest

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The COMELEC decided to hold the plebiscite for creating the province of Davao Occidental simultaneously with the October 28, 2013 Barangay Elections to save expenses. Petitioner Cagas argued this was unconstitutional as only Congress can amend the requirement in the law for the plebiscite to be held within 60 days. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, finding that the COMELEC acted within its constitutional power to enforce election laws and that holding the plebiscite so close to the May 2013 national elections was logistically and financially impossible. Synchronizing the plebiscite with the Barangay Elections was a justified decision that did not constitute grave abuse of discretion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    129 views2 pages

    Cagas vs. Comelec

    Uploaded by

    Christian Roque
    The COMELEC decided to hold the plebiscite for creating the province of Davao Occidental simultaneously with the October 28, 2013 Barangay Elections to save expenses. Petitioner Cagas argued this was unconstitutional as only Congress can amend the requirement in the law for the plebiscite to be held within 60 days. The Supreme Court dismissed the petition, finding that the COMELEC acted within its constitutional power to enforce election laws and that holding the plebiscite so close to the May 2013 national elections was logistically and financially impossible. Synchronizing the plebiscite with the Barangay Elections was a justified decision that did not constitute grave abuse of discretion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Cagas vs COMELEC

    G.R. No. 209185 October 25, 2013

    Facts: Cagas, while he was representative of the first legislative district of


    Davao Del Sur, filed with Hon. Franklin Bautista, then representataive of the
    second legislative district of the same province, HB 4451, a bill creating the
    province of Davao Occidental, which was signed in to law as RA 10360, the
    Charter of the Province of Davao Occidental.
    Sec. 46. Plebiscite. The Province of Davao Occidental shall be created, as
    provided for in this Charter, upon approval by the majority of the votes cast
    by the voters of the affected areas in a plebiscite to be conducted and
    supervised by the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) within sixty (60) days
    from the date of the effectivity of this Charter.
    As easrly as November 27, 2012, prior to the effectivity of RA 10360, the
    COMELEC suspended the conduct of all plebiscites as a matter of policy and
    in view of the preparations for the 13 May 2013 National and Local Elections.
    During a meeting held on July 31, 2013, the COMELEC decided to hold the
    plebiscite for the creation of Davao Occidental simultaneously with the OCt
    28, 2013 Barangay Elections to save on expenses.
    Cagas then filed a petition for prohibition, contending that the COMELEC is
    without authority to amend or modify section 46 of RA 10360 by mere
    resolution because it is only Congress who can do so thus, COMELEC'S act of
    suspending the plebiscite is unconstitutional.

    Issue: Whether COMELEC's act is unconstitutitonal?

    Held: No. Petition dismissed for lack of merit.


    Political Law- The Constitution grants the COMELEC the power to "enforce
    and administer all laws and regulations relative to the conduct of an election,
    plebiscite, initiative, referendum and recall."
    The COMELEC has exclusive charge of the enforcement and administration of
    all laws relative to the conduct of elections for the purpose of ensuring free,
    orderly and honest elections. The text and intent of Sec. 2(1) of the Art. 9 (C)
    is to give COMELEC "all the necessary and incidental powers for it to achieve
    the objective of holding free, orderly, honest, peaceful and credible
    elections."

    Political Law- The right of suffrage should prevail over mere scheduling
    mishaps in holding elections or plebiscites.

    The tight time frame in the enactment, signing into law, and effectivity of
    R.A. No. 10360 on 5 February 2013, coupled with the subsequent conduct of
    the National and Local Elections on 13 May 2013 as mandated by the
    Constitution, rendered impossible the holding of a plebiscite for the creation
    of the province of Davao Occidental on or before 6 April 2013 as scheduled in
    R.A. No. 10360. We also take judicial notice of the COMELEC's burden in the
    accreditation and registration of candidates for the Party-List Elections. The
    logistic and financial impossibility of holding a plebiscite so close to the
    National and Local Elections is unforeseen and unexpected, a cause
    analogous to force majeure and administrative mishaps covered in Section 5
    of B.P. Blg. 881. The COMELEC is justified, and did not act with grave abuse
    of discretion, in postponing the holding of the plebiscite for the creation of
    the province of Davao Occidental to 28 October 2013 to synchronize it with
    the Barangay Elections.

    To comply with the 60-day period to conduct the plebiscite then, as insisted,
    petitioner would have the COMELEC hold off all of its tasks for the National
    and Local Elections. If COMELEC abandoned any of its tasks or did not strictly
    follow the timetable for the accomplishment of these tasks then it could have
    put in serious jeopardy the conduct of the May 2013 National and Local
    Elections. The COMELEC had to focus all its attention and concentrate all its
    manpower and other resources on its preparation for the May 2013 National
    and Local Elections, and to ensure that it would not be derailed, it had to
    defer the conduct of all plebiscites including that of R.A. No. 10360.

    You might also like