International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)

ISSN (Online): 2319-7064

Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438

Assembly Analysis of Piston, Connecting Rod &

Crankshaft
L. Karthik Chakravarthy Dr. P. Srikanth 2
1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VCE, Wgl, TS
2
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, KITS, Wgl, TS

Abstract: The main function of the piston of an IC engine is to receive the impulse from the expanding gas and to transmit the energy
to the crankshaft through the connecting rod. The piston must also disperse a large amount of heat from the combustion chamber to the
cylinder walls. The aim of this Project is to Model & Assemble the Piston, Connecting Rod & Crankshaft for a 4-stoke air-cooled 150cc
Engine by theoretical calculations & also to Compare the Structural Analysis & Modal Analysis on two different materials such as
(Aluminum Alloy Cast iron) for Piston, (Aluminum Alloy Manganese steel) for Connecting Rod & (Nickel Chromium steel High
carbon steel) for Crankshaft. Modeling, Assembly of Piston, Connecting rod and Crankshaft is done in Pro/Engineering software &
Analysis is done in ANSYS. Structural analysis is used to determine displacements & stresses under static & buckling loads. Modal
Analysis is used to determine the Vibration characteristics(natural frequencies & mode shapes) of the three components. By comparing
the displacement & stress results, using Cast Iron for Piston, Manganese Steel for Connecting rod and High Carbon Steel for
crankshaft is best combination for assembly.

Keywords: Piston, Connecting Rod, Crankshaft, Pro/E, ANSYS, Structural Analysis & Modal Analysis.

1. Introduction rod bolts which hold the bearing "cap" onto the big end;
typically there is a pinhole bored through the bearing and the
Internal combustion engines are seen every day in big end of the con rod so that pressurized lubricating motor
automobiles, trucks, and buses. The name internal oil squirts out onto the thrust side of the cylinder wall to
combustion refers also to gas turbines except that the name lubricate the travel of the pistons and piston rings.
is usually applied to reciprocating internal combustion (I.C.)
engines like the ones found in everyday automobiles. Spark 1.3 Crankshaft
ignition engines take a mixture of fuel and air, compress it,
and ignite it using a spark plug. The name `reciprocating' is The crankshaft, sometimes casually abbreviated to crank, is
given because of the motion that the crank mechanism goes the part of an engine which translates reciprocating linear
through. The piston cylinder engine is basically a crank- piston motion into rotation. To convert the reciprocating
slider mechanism, where the slider is the piston in this case. motion into rotation, the crankshaft has "crank throws" or
The piston is moved up and down by the rotary motion of "crankpins", additional bearing surfaces whose axis is offset
the two arms or links. The crankshaft rotates which makes from that of the crank, to which the "big ends" of the
the two links rotate. The piston is encapsulated within a connecting rods from each cylinder attach. It typically
combustion chamber. The bore is the diameter of the connects to a flywheel, to reduce the pulsation characteristic
chamber. The valves on top represent induction and exhaust of the four-stroke cycle, and sometimes a torsional or
valves necessary for the intake of an air-fuel mixture and vibrational damper at the opposite end, to reduce the torsion
exhaust of chamber residuals. In a spark ignition engine a vibrations often caused along the length of the crankshaft by
spark plug is required to transfer an electrical discharge to the cylinders farthest from the output end acting on the
ignite the mixture. torsional elasticity of the metal.

1.1 Piston 2. Experimental Calculations

In every engine, piston plays an important role in working 2.1. Engine Specifications
and producing results. Piston forms a guide and bearing for Suzuki GS150R is a 150cc, 4-stroke air-cooled engine is
the small end of connecting rod and also transmits the force used for the study on Piston, Connecting Rod & Crank
of explosion in the cylinder, to the crank shaft through Shaft. This delivers robust acceleration performance in the
connecting rod. The piston is the single, most active and low to mid range. The engine is specially deigned to fulfill
very critical component of the automotive engine. the conflicting demands of acceleration and fuel efficiency.

1.2 Connecting Rod Type Air-cooled, 4-Stroke,

Bore x Stroke (mm) = 57.0 x 58.6
In a reciprocating piston engine, the connecting rod connects Displacement (cm3)= 149.5
the piston to the crank or crankshaft. The small end attaches Max Power=13.8bhp @ 8,500rpm
to the piston pin, gudgeon pin or wrist pin & big end Max Torque=13.4Nm @ 6,000rpm
connects to the bearing journal on the crank throw, running
Compression Ratio = 9.35:1
on replaceable bearing shells accessible via the connecting
Carburetor=BS26 with TPS
Volume 4 Issue 6, June 2015
www.ijsr.net
Paper ID: SUB155788 1803
Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
 International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
ISSN (Online): 2319-7064
Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438
Ignition=CDI lc = length of crankpin = 34.38 mm
Starting=Electric & Kick b = distance between the bearings 1 & 2 is equal to twice
Transmission=5-speed the piston diameter

Maximum gas pressure , = 2D = 257 = 114 mm, i.e. b1 = b2 = b/2 = 57 mm

P = 15.454N/mm2
Indicated power IP =11217.05kw 3. 2D Drawings
Brake power BP = 8415.2kw
Mechanical efficiency=75% 3.1 PISTON

2.2. PISTON

Temperature at the center of piston head Tc = 2600c to

2900c
Temperature at the edge of piston head Te = 1850c to
2150c

Maximum gas pressure p = 15.454N/mm2

Bore or outside diameter of piston D = 57mm

Thickness of piston headth = = 5.45mm

Piston rings
= pressure of the gas on the cylinder wall =
0.042N/mm2
= allowable bending(tensile stress) for cast iron rings = Figure 1.1: Piston 2D drawing
110Mpa
3.2 Connecting Rod
Radial thickness t1 = D =1.93mm

Axial thickness t2 = D/10nr = 1.9mm

nr = no of rings = 3
width of the top land b1=6.54mm
distance between ring grooves,
b2 = t2 = 1.9mm
Total length of the piston
L = length of the skirt length of ring section + top land
Length of ring section = 5 b2 or t2 = 9.5mm
L = 45.6 + 9.5 + 6.54 = 61.64mm

2.3 Connecting Rod

Length of connecting rod = 2times the stroke L = 2 58.6 Figure 1.2: Connecting rod 2D drawing
= 117.2mm
Buckling load , Wb = (c . A)/1+a[l/kxx]2 3.3 Crankshaft
Thickness of flange and web of the section t = 3.21mm
Width of section B=4t=12.84mm
Height of section H=5t=16.05=16mm
Area A=11t2=113.3mm
Height of the big end (crank end)=H2=1.1H to 1.25H
H2=20mm
Height at the small end (piston end)=0.9H
H1=14.4mm

2.4 Crankshaft

D = piston diameter or cylinder bore = 57 mm

P = maximum intensity of pressure on the piston = 15.454

N/mm2
dc = Diameter of crankpin = 22.92mm Figure 1.3: Crankshaft 2Ddrawing

Volume 4 Issue 6, June 2015

www.ijsr.net
Paper ID: SUB155788 1804
Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
 International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
ISSN (Online): 2319-7064
Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438
3.4 Assembly 4.3 Connecting Rod

Figure 2.3: Connecting rod 3D model

4.4 Crankshaft

Figure 1.4: Assembly 2D drawing

4. Designing the Models by using

PRO/Engineer software
Pro/ENGINEER Wildfire is the standard in 3D product
design, featuring industry-leading productivity tools that
promote best practices in design while ensuring compliance
with your industry and company standards. Integrated Figure 2.4: Crankshaft 3Dmodel
Pro/ENGINEER CAD/CAM/CAE solutions allow you to
design faster than ever, while maximizing innovation and 4.5 Assembly
quality to ultimately create exceptional products.

4.1 Piston

Figure 2.5: Assembly 3D model

5. Results & Discussions

Structural analysis is Used to determine displacements,
Figure 2.1: Piston 3D model stresses, etc. under static loading conditions. ANSYS can
compute both linear and nonlinear static analyses.
4.2 Piston Pin Nonlinearities can include plasticity, stress stiffening, large
deflection, large strain, hyper elasticity, contact surfaces,
and creep. Buckling Analysis is Used to calculate the
buckling loads and determine the buckling mode shape.
Both linear (eigen value) buckling and nonlinear buckling
analyses are possible.

5.1 Structural Analysis for Materials

Material E Density
Piston Aluminum Alloy 70000 0.33 0.0000026 Kg/Mm3
N/mm2
Connecting Aluminum Alloy 70000 0.33 0.0000026 Kg/Mm3
Rod N/mm2
Crank Nickel 210000 0.0000077 Kg/Mm3
2
shaft Chromium Steel N/mm 0.27
Figure 2.2: Piston pin 3D model
Volume 4 Issue 6, June 2015
www.ijsr.net
Paper ID: SUB155788 1805
Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
 International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
ISSN (Online): 2319-7064
Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438
than a typical static analysis. A reduced solver, utilizing
automatically or manually selected master degrees of
freedom is used to drastically reduce the problem size and
solution time.

Displacement

Figure 3.1: Imported Model from Pro/Engineer

Applying Pressure 15.454N/mm2

Figure 3.4: Displacement

As per the analysis images

Displacement Von Mises Stress

For Material
(mm) (N/mm2)
Piston Cast Iron
Connecting rod Aluminum
Alloy A360 0.328559 303.396
Crankshaft Nickel Chromium
Alloy Steel

Figure 3.2: Applying the Loads 5.3 Structural Analysis for Materials:

Von Mises Stress

Material E Density
Piston Cast Iron75000 0.211 0.000007kg/mm3
N/mm2
Connecting Manganese 210000 0.29 0.000008 kg/mm3
Rod Steel N/mm2
Crank shaft High Carbon 200000 0.000007872
steel N/mm2 0.295 kg/mm3

Pressure 15.454N/mm2

Figure 3.3: Nodal Solution

5.2 Modal Analysis

Modal analysis is typically used to determine the vibration

characteristics (natural frequencies and mode shapes) of a
structure or a machine component while it is being designed.
It can also serve as a starting point for another, more
detailed, dynamic analysis, such as a harmonic response or
full transient dynamic analysis. Modal analyses, while being
one of the most basic dynamic analysis types available in
ANSYS, can also be more computationally time consuming Figure 3.5: Applying the Loads
Volume 4 Issue 6, June 2015
www.ijsr.net
Paper ID: SUB155788 1806
Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY
 International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
ISSN (Online): 2319-7064
Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438
Von Mises Stress References
[1] Afzal, A., 2004, Fatigue Behavior and Life prediction
of Forged Steel and PM Connecting Rods, Masters
Thesis, University of Toledo.
[2] Athavale, S. and Sajanpawar, P. R., 1991, Studies on
Some Modelling Aspects in the Finite Element Analysis
of Small Gasoline Engine Components, Small Engine
Technology Conference Proceedings, Society of
Automotive Engineers of Japan, Tokyo, pp. 379-389.
[3] Balasubramaniam, B., Svoboda, M., and Bauer, W.,
1991, Structural optimization of I.C. engines subjected
to mechanical and thermal loads, Computer Methods
in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 89, pp.
Figure 3.6: Nodal Solution 337-360.
[4] Bhandari, V. B., 1994, Design of Machine Elements,
5.4 Modal Analysis Tata McGraw-Hill.
[5] Clark, J. P., Field III, F. R., and Nallicheri, N. V., 1989,
Displacement Engine state-of-the-art a competitive assessment of
steel, cost estimates and performance analysis,
Research Report BR 89-1, Automotive Applications
Committee, American Iron and Steel Institute.
[6] El-Sayed, M. E. M., and Lund, E. H., 1990, Structural
optimization with fatigue life constraints, Engineering
Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 1149-1156.
[7] Folgar, F., Wldrig, J. E., and Hunt, J. W., 1987,
Design, Fabrication and Performance of Fiber
FP/Metal Matrix Composite Connecting Rods, SAE
Technical Paper Series 1987, Paper No. 870406.
[8] Ferguson, C. R., 1986, Internal Combustion Engines,
Applied Thermosciences, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
[9] Goenka, P. K. and Oh, K. P., 1986, An Optimum
Connecting Rod Design Study A Lubrication
Figure 3.7: Displacement
Viewpoint, Journal of Tribology, Transactions of
ASME, July 1986, Vol. 108.
As per the analysis images
Von Mises
Displacement
Material Stress
(mm)
(N/mm2)
Piston Cast Iron
Connecting rod Manganese Steel 0.188534 292.354
Crankshaft High Carbon Steel

6. Conclusion
In this project piston, connecting rod and crankshaft are
designed & assembled the three parts. Modeling and
assembly is done in Pro/Engineer. Structural, Modal analysis
are done on the assembly. Analysis is done in ANSYS.

By performing structural analysis, we get displacement and

stress. The stress is within the range of permissible stress
values. By performing the modal analysis, we can observe
different mode shapes of the assembly. By observing the
stress value, we conclude that our design is safe for working
condition. By comparing the stress results, using (Cast Iron
for Piston, Manganese Steel for Connecting rod and High
Carbon Steel for crankshaft) is the best combination for
assembly.

Volume 4 Issue 6, June 2015

www.ijsr.net
Paper ID: SUB155788 1807
Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY