FAQs Sustainable Development Summit Final
FAQs Sustainable Development Summit Final
FAQs Sustainable Development Summit Final
1
launch a process to develop a set of SDGs was made by UN Member States at the United
Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20), held in Rio de Janeiro in June
2012.
People, as we are determined to end poverty and hunger, in all their forms and dimensions,
and to ensure that all human beings can fulfil their potential in dignity and equality and in a
healthy environment.
Planet, to protect the planet from degradation, including through sustainable consumption
and production, sustainably managing its natural resources and taking urgent action on
climate change, so that it can support the needs of the present and future generations.
Prosperity, to ensure that all human beings can enjoy prosperous and fulfilling lives and that
economic, social and technological progress occurs in harmony with nature.
Peace, to foster peaceful, just and inclusive societies free from fear and violence. There can
be no sustainable development without peace and no peace without sustainable development.
Partnership, to mobilize the means required to implement this agenda through a revitalised
global partnership for sustainable development, based on a spirit of strengthened global
solidarity, focussed in particular on the needs of the poorest and most vulnerable and with the
participation of all countries, all stakeholders and all people.
Why are the Sustainable Development Goals so broad in comparison to the Millennium
Development Goals which were very specific?
There are 17 sustainable development goals with 169 targets, in contrast to the 8 Millennium
Development Goals with 21 targets. The complex challenges that exist in the world today
2
demand that a wide range of issues be covered. It is, also, critical to address the root causes of
the problems and not only the symptoms.
The Sustainable Development Goals are the result of a negotiation process that involved the
193 UN Member States and also saw unprecedented participation of civil society and other
stakeholders. This led to the representation of a wide range of interests and perspectives. On
the other hand, the MDGs were produced by a group of experts behind closed doors.
The SDGs are broad in scope because they will address the interconnected elements of
sustainable development: economic growth, social inclusion and environmental protection.
The MDGs focused primarily on the social agenda.
The MDGs targeted developing countries, particularly the poorest, while the Sustainable
Development Goals will apply to the entire world, developed and developing countries.
Arent 17 SDGs and 169 targets too many, too ambiguous and unrealistic?
Poverty eradication, shared prosperity and planetary sustainability cannot be reduced to a
simple formula.
The SDGs represent the shared global goals and targets that will be tailored at the country
level, informed by contextbased evidence.
Civil society has participated in the process of negotiations for the new sustainable
development agenda. How can we quantify their contribution to the final document?
The negotiating process on the sustainable development goals involved the
unprecedented participation of civil society and other stakeholders, such as the private
sector and mayors.
During the negotiations, civil society and other stakeholders were able to speak
directly to government representatives.
3
Many young people were also involved from the beginning on social media platforms
and the UNs global My World survey that received more than 7 million votes from
around the world, with approximately 75% of participants under 30 years of age.
How much will the implementation of this new sustainable development agenda cost?
The means of implementation how to mobilize the financial resources to achieve the
sustainable development agenda is a core feature of the new agenda.
This ambitious agenda will require the mobilization of significant resourcesin the
trillions of dollars. But these resources already exist. There are far more than enough
savings in the world to finance the new agenda.
Resources need to be mobilized from domestic and international sources, as well as
from the public and private sectors.
Official development assistance is still necessary to help finance sustainable
development to assist the least developed countries.
The agenda can be met within the framework of a revitalized global partnership for
sustainable development, supported by the concrete policies and actions as outlined in
the Addis Ababa Action Agenda, the outcome document of the Third International
Conference on Financing for Development held in July.
4
help address climate change by reducing emissions and building climate resilience.
Action on climate change will drive sustainable development and viceversa.
Climate change, left unchecked, will roll back the development gains we have made
over the last decades and will make further gains impossible.
Tackling climate change and fostering sustainable development are two mutually
reinforcing sides of the same coin; sustainable development cannot be achieved
without climate action, as many of the SDGs are actually addressing the core drivers
of climate change.
How does the climate component of the SDGs influence the debate on climate change
and the upcoming climate change conference in Paris later this year?
The consensus reached on the outcome document of the new sustainable development
agenda does not aim to anticipate or usurp the role of the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change, the body responsible for the Climate Change
Conference in Paris in December.
Nevertheless, the agreement will send a strong signal that the world has high
expectations that the time has come for decisive positive outcomes on matters of
climate change.
Given that many of the SDGs guide action on the core drivers of climate change, their
implementation, beginning on 1 January 2016, will accelerate transition towards the
implementation of the climate agreement that will enter into force in 2020.
5
About 800 million people still live in extreme poverty and 795 million still suffer from
hunger.
Between 2000 and 2015, the number of children out of school declined by almost half.
However, there are still 57 million children who are denied the right to primary education.
Gender inequality persists in spite of more representation of women in parliament and more
girls going to school. Women continue to face discrimination in access to work, economic
assets and participation in private and public decisionmaking.
Economic gaps still exist between the poorest and richest households, and rural and urban
areas. Children from the poorest 20% of households are more than twice as likely to be
stunted as those from the wealthiest 20% and are also four times as likely to be out of school.
Improved sanitation facilities are only covering half of rural population, as opposed to 82% in
urban areas.
While the mortality rate for children under five dropped by 53 per cent between 1990 and
2015, child deaths continue to be increasingly concentrated in the poorest regions and in the
first month of life.
How will progress of the SDGs be measured? How many indicators will be developed
for the 169 targets of the Sustainable Development Goals?
The 17 goals and 169 targets will be monitored and reviewed using a set of global indicators.
These will be complemented by indicators at the regional and national levels, which will be
developed by Member States.
The Inter Agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators will develop the global indicator
framework which the UN Statistical Commission will subsequently agree on in March 2016.
Thereafter, the Economic and Social Council and the General Assembly will adopt these
indicators.
Chief statisticians from Member States are working on the identification of the targets
with the aim to have 2 indicators for each target. There will be approximately 300
indicators for all the targets. Where the targets cover crosscutting issues, however,
the number of indicators may be reduced.