Are Lawyers Liars?: (Short Paper No. 2)

PALE
(Short Paper No. 2)
QUESTION:
Are lawyers liars?
WINDY AWE MALAPIT

LLB / 3rd yr.
SMC College of Law
1
A common misnomer labeling lawyers as liars. Society have been fed
with the information that lawyers are like politicians who are masters at the
game of scheming and fabricating the truth. But the answer to the question at
hand is in the negative. Though it may be ideal and rational that lawyers will
only uphold on what is the truth and stand firm to their oath of doing no
falsehood to the courts as to their clients, it will not be that much to think
that perhaps some lawyers may do falsehood just like everybody does.
The point of the matter is that, can it really be said that lawyers
sustain their livelihood by dishing out what is the truth? In an interview to
some lawyers, their answer to the question was a big NO. Attorney A
clearly emphasized that That is an unfortunate and widespread
misconception that what we lawyers do for a living is lie. This simply isnt
true. Lawyers have the duty to conduct themselves as officers of the courts
in which they are admitted to practice. This obligation acts as a check
against bad temptations that might be brought on by the obligation to keep
their clients confidences. Lawyers risk censure, suspension, or even being
disbarred if they lie in court, suborn perjury, hide/manufacture evidence, etc.
While there are always a few bad apples in any professions, most lawyers
therefore do not lie. What lawyers actually do is use the facts and law to
advocate their clients interests In a conversation with another lawyer
Attorney B, in a convivial manner, she answered of course NOT, it is the
witness who tells lies, not the lawyer. Lawyers are merely just arranging the
facts for the benefit of the clients.
2
In terms of jurisprudence, Supreme Court decisions enunciated the
vital role of lawyers in doing no falsehood for the effective administration of
justice. Repeatedly pronouncing to live by the Code of Professional
Responsibility, remembering with their hearts how noble the legal
profession. In the case of Que vs. Atty. Revilla1, A lawyer is expected to act
candidly, fairly and truthfully in his work. His duty as a lawyer obligates him
not to conceal the truth from the court, or to mislead the court in any
manner, no matter how demanding his duties to his clients may be. In case of
conflict, his duties to his client yield to his duty to deal candidly with the
court. The canon obligates a lawyer, in defending his client, to employ only
such means as are consistent with truth and honor. More profoundly
explained into words the crucial role of the lawyer in the case of Molina vs.
Atty. Magat2 not to make any false and untruthful statements, as such, The
practice of law is a privilege bestowed on those who show that they possess
and continue to possess the legal qualification for it. Indeed, lawyers are
expected to maintain at all times a high standard of legal proficiency and
morality, including honesty, integrity and fair dealing. They must perform
their four-fold duty to society, the legal profession, the courts and their
clients, in accordance with the values and norms of the legal profession as
embodied in the Code of Professional Responsibility.
1 Conrado Que vs. Atty. Anastacio Revilla, Jr.; A.C. No. 7054; December
4, 2009.
2 Rodrigo A. Molina vs. Atty. Ceferino R. Magat; A.C. No. 1900; June 13,
2012.
3
The above-quoted judicial decisions are firm undertakings that all legal
practitioners must seriously abide, otherwise, no one will be able to venture
into the practice of law if immensely tainted with fabrication, half-truth or
barefaced lie.
Thus, the Supreme Court have been strictly implementing disciplinary
measures to erring lawyers by way of suspension from the practice of law or
in worse case scenario, perpetually preventing a lawyer to perform legal
services disbarment. Lawyering is a unique and noble profession, hence,
lawyers must exhibit the maximum level of integrity, honesty and
competence, for deceit has no place in a profession wherein the primary and
ultimate purpose is towards the interests of justice.
4
REFERENCES:
(a) Conrado Que vs. Atty. Anastacio Revilla, Jr; A.C. No. 7054;
December 4, 2009.
(b) Rodrigo A. Molina vs. Atty. Ceferino R. Magat; A.C. No. 1900; June
13, 2012.

Are Lawyers Liars?: (Short Paper No. 2)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Are Lawyers Liars?: (Short Paper No. 2)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Are Lawyers Liars?: (Short Paper No. 2)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PALE

(Short Paper No. 2)

Are lawyers liars?

WINDY AWE MALAPIT

sustain their livelihood by dishing out what is the truth? In an interview to

clearly emphasized that That is an unfortunate and widespread

in which they are admitted to practice. This obligation acts as a check

against bad temptations that might be brought on by the obligation to keep

their clients confidences. Lawyers risk censure, suspension, or even being

disbarred if they lie in court, suborn perjury, hide/manufacture evidence, etc.

advocate their clients interests In a conversation with another lawyer

Attorney B, in a convivial manner, she answered of course NOT, it is the

facts for the benefit of the clients.

vital role of lawyers in doing no falsehood for the effective administration of

justice. Repeatedly pronouncing to live by the Code of Professional

Responsibility, remembering with their hearts how noble the legal

expected to maintain at all times a high standard of legal proficiency and

embodied in the Code of Professional Responsibility.

practitioners must seriously abide, otherwise, no one will be able to venture

into the practice of law if immensely tainted with fabrication, half-truth or

Thus, the Supreme Court have been strictly implementing disciplinary

measures to erring lawyers by way of suspension from the practice of law or

in worse case scenario, perpetually preventing a lawyer to perform legal

services disbarment. Lawyering is a unique and noble profession, hence,

lawyers must exhibit the maximum level of integrity, honesty and

ultimate purpose is towards the interests of justice.

You might also like