Performance Project
Performance Project
Performance Project
PROJECT REPORT
Submitted to the
SUBMITTED BY
NAME: R.JAYANTHI
Date:
Place:
DECLARATION
DATE: R.JAYANTHI
PLACE:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I Acknowledge my profound gratitude to our Principal Dr. S. Kalpana Bai, M.Sc (Stats),
M.Sc (Maths)., M.Phil., Ph.D., DRBCCC Hindu college (Shift II) Pattabiram, Chennai 72 for
permitting me to carry out my project work successfully.
I express my sincere thanks to my project guide Prof. M.MOHANPRIYA, MBA, M.Phil for
his supervision and guidance which helped me in completing the project successfully.
I owe my thanks to University of Madras for creating this invaluable opportunity for the
students of UG Department of INFORMATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT for having
included the project study in this curriculum.
I also thank my parents and friends and all my well-wishers who had extended their support
to me towards preforming this project study in a successful manner.
R.JAYANTHI
INDEX
CHAPTER 1
1.1 General Introduction of study
1.2 Objective of study
1.3 Need of study
1.4 Significance of the study
1.5 Statement of research problem
1.6 Methodology
1.7 Chapterisation
CHAPTER 2
2.1 Concept of the study
CHAPTER 3
3.1 Company profile
CHAPTER 4
4.1 Topic of the study
4.2 Sources of data
4.3 Tools use for data collection
4.4 Sampling
4.5 Sample respondent
4.6 Tools use for data analysis
4.7 Definition of important term
4.8 Periodic study
4.9 Limitation study
CHAPTER 5
5.1 Data analysis and interpretation
5.2 Chi- square
CHAPTER 6
6.1 Summary of finding and suggestion
6.2 Annexure
6.3 Bibliography
LIST OF TABLES
Appraisal is necessary for all important decision relating to workers such as promotion,
remuneration and rewards, training and development as well as long term planning and
organization development.
It assists to provide for employees to correct their mistakes, and it also proper guidance and
criticism for employees development.
By studying about the performance of employees, we would wish to appraise the various
levels of them.
1.2 OBJECTIVES OF STUDY:
Primary objective
Secondary objective
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
To suggest some measure for improving and training the methods to appraise
the performance of the underwriter.
To further growth and development the person should maintain and assess the
potential.
The superior has a proper understanding about the sub ordination or insurer.
Time consuming.
No accurate answer
Lack of output
Wrong judgment.
From the respondents result, the percentage analysis is calculated from the below
formula:
No. of respondents
*100
Total No. of respondents
CHI-SQUARE = E (O-E)2
The value table is formed out using the chi-square by comparing the degree of
freedom with the level of significances which normally 5%
Meaning:
INTRODUCTION:
In simple words it is the process of assigning employees at this work for their further
development.
DEFINITIONS:
It is the evaluation or appraisal of the relative worth to the company of a mans services
on his jobs.
CHARATERISTICS:
CLEAR OBJECTIVE:
The appraisal system should be fair and beneficial to both the individual employee and the
organization should be linked with other subsystems of personnel management.
STANDARDISATION:
The appraisal form, procedures and rules should be standardized. There should
be well-defined performance criteria and standards.
TRAINING:
Evaluators should be given training in procedures and principles of appraisal. They should
be provided with knowledge and skill in designing appraisals.
JOB RELATEDNESS:
The appraisal system should focus attention on job related behavior and performance. It
should provide information on job related activities and areas.
MUTUAL TRUST:
The rating should be communicated to both the employees and the raters.
The employee should get information on their performance.
HELP FOCUS:
RECOGNITION OF DIFFERENCE:
Organization differs in terms of works, size, resources, need and environment.
It should be specific and made for particular company.
They provide a structure where a manager can meet and discuss performance
with an employee.
They allow a manager the opportunity to provide the emplo9yee with feedback
about their performance and discuss how well the employee goals were
accomplished.
They provide a structured process for an employee to clarify expectations and
discuss issues with their manager.
They provide a structured for thinking through and planning the upcoming year
and developing employee goals.
They are based on human assessment and are subject to rater errors and biar.
QUALITY OF WORK:
Use of time.
QUANTITY OF WORK:
Neatness and accuracy.
Contributing work and effort to group performed to meet agrees upon objectives
and achieve team success.
JOB KNOWLEDGE:
INITIATIVE:
Self-starter, develop and implement new methods, procedure, solution, design and or
applications of existing designs or procedures.
INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS:
Consider the extent to which the employee is cooperative, considerate, and tactful
in dealing with supervisors, sub-ordinates, faculty, students and others.
The degree to which he or she complies with or over sees the compliance with
university safety rules.
COMMUNICATION ABILITIES:
Ability to listen and understand information.
Many companies have implemented 360 appraisals, where performance ratings are
collected simultaneously from subordinates, peers, supervisors and employees
themselves. Typically 360 appraisals are used for development and feedback purpose.
The focus is on evaluation of competencies that are relevant for job performance in
useful behavioral terms. Although 360 appraisals are being used by many firms, they
are most successful in organization that offers open and participative climates, along
with active career development system.
Many 360 feedback tools are not customized to the needs of the organizations in
which they are used. 360 feedback is not equally useful in all types of organizations
and with all types of jobs. Additionally, using 360 feedback tools for appraisal purposes
has increasingly come under fire as performance criteria may not be valid and job based,
employees may not be adequately trained to evaluate a co-worker's performance, and
feedback providers can manipulate these systems. Employee manipulation of feedback
ratings has been reported in some companies who have utilized 360 feedback for
performance evaluation including GE (Welch 2001), IBM (Linman 2011), and Amazon
(Kantor and Streitfeld 2015).
The U.S. military has criticized its own use of 360-degree feedback programs in
employment decisions because of problems with validity and reliability.Other branches
of the U.S. government have questioned 360-degree feedback reviews as well. Still,
these organizations continue to use multi-rater feedback in their development processes.
CHAPTER 3
COMPANY PROFILE
CHAPTER 3
3.1COMPANY PROFILE:
General insurance business (Nationalization) act 1972 (Since amended in 2002) and
IRDA act 1999.
After Nationalization united India has grown by leaps and bounds and has 18300. Work
force spread across 1340 offices providing insurance cover to more than 1 crore policy
holders.
The company has variety of insurance products to provide insurance cover from bullock
cart to satellites.
United India has been in the fore front of designing and implementing complex covers to
large customers, as increases of DNGC Ltd, GMR- Hyderabad international Airport Ltd,
and Mumbai international Airport Ltd Tirumala- Tirupati Devasthanam etc.
It has been also the pioneer in taking insurance to rural masses with large level
implementation of universal health insurance programme of government of India and
Viaya Raji.
It transacts general insurance business. The company carries out its functions and duties
in accordance with the objective defined in its memorandum and articles of association
and the guidelines laid down in Insurance act in 1938.
PRODUCT:
PERSONAL POLICIES:
House holder.
Personal accident.
Mediclaim.
Unimedicare.
Bhavishya Arogya.
COMMERCIAL POLICIES:
Fire Insurance
Marine Insurance
Motor Insurance
Industrial Insurance
Liability Insurance
FIRE INSURANCE:-
Fire Insurance has establishment in 1666. In India the fire insurance business is not so
developed as in foreign countries.
Fire insurance business in India is governed by the all India fire tariff that lays down
the term of coverage, the premium rater and the conditions of the fire policy.
The fire Insurance policy has been renamed as Standard Fire and special perils
policy.
Fire
Lightning
Electricity
Explosion or implosion
Aircraft damage
Terrorism
Natural disasters etc.
Most policies covers a home regardless of whether the fire originates from with the
home or from outside the home.
MARINE INSURANCE:-
Marine Insurance started at 1600 in England at Charles coffee shop for using
marine policies. The insurance Act was passed on sec (2) 1938 and sec(3) 1963. Marine
Insurance Act 1960.
Marine insurance cover the loss or damage of ships, cargo, terminals and any
transport or cargo by which property is transferred acquired or held between the points of
origin and final destination.
When goods are transported by mail or courier, shipping insurance is used instead.
Maritime Insurance was the earliest well developed kind of insurance with origin in
the Greek and Roman Maritime loan.
A Marine policy typically covered only three quarters of the insured liabilities
towards third parties.
The typical liabilities arise in respect of collision with another ship, known as
Running down collision with a fixed object is Harbour and wreck removal (a wreck
may serve to block a harbour).
In 19th century ship owners banded together ion mutual underwriting clubs known as
protection and indemnity clubs (P and I).
LABILITY INSURANCE:-
Liability Insurance is a very broad superset that covers legal claims against the
insured. Many type of insurance included an aspect of liability coverage for example a
home owners insurance policy will normally include liability coverage which protects
the insured in the event of a claim brought by someone who slips and falls on the
property.
The protection offered by a liability insurance policy is twofold a legal defense in the
event of a lawsuit commenced against the policy holder and indemnification (payment on
behalf of the insured) with respect to a settlement or court verdict.
Liability policies typically cover only the negligence of the insured and will or
intentional act by the insured.
MOTOR INSURANCE:-
Motor Insurance also known as car insurance, vehicle insurance or auto insurance is
insurance for cars, trucks, motorcycles and other road vehicles. Its primary use is to
provide financial protection against physical damage and/or bodily injury resulting from
traffic collisions and against liability that could also arise there from.
The specific term of vehicles insurance vary with legal regulation in each region. To
a lesser degree vehicle insurance may additionally offer financial protection against theft
of the vehicle and possible damage to a vehicle, sustained from things other than traffic
collisions such as keying and damage sustained by colliding with stationary object.
Contents:
Widespread use of the automobile began after the First World War in urban areas.
Cars were relatively fast and dangerous by the stage, yet there was still no compulsory
from of car insurance anywhere in the world.
A compulsory car insurance scheme was first introduced in the United Kingdom
with the Road Traffic Act 1930.
Public Policy:
In many jurisdictions it is compulsory to have vehicle insurance before using or
keeping a motor vehicle on public roads.
Several jurisdictions have experimented with a pay - as - you - drive insurance
plan which is paid through a Gardiner tax (Petrol tax).
It covers the cost of all reasonable medical treatment for injuries received in the
accident, loss of wages, cost of care services and in some cases compensation for pain and
suffering.
Auto Insurance in India deals with the insurance covers for the loss or damage caused
to the automobile or its parts due to natural and man-made calamities.
It provides accident cover for individual owner of the vehicles while driving and also
for passengers and third party legal liability.
In the Auto Insurance in India, private car insurance is the fastest growing sector as
it is compulsory for all the new cars.
The Two Wheeler Insurance under the auto insurance in India covers accidental
insurance for the driver of the vehicles. The amount of premium depends on the
current showroom price multiplied by the depreciation rate fixed by the tariff
advisory committee at the time of the beginning of policy period.
Liability for third party injury/death, third party property and liability to
paid driver.
Family Medicare Policy covers all the members of the family under a single sum
insured. Family to be covered can comprise of the insured, spouse and dependent
children the age of proposer should be between 18 and 80 years.
The sum insured is between Rs. 1 lakh to 5 lakhs in multiples of Rs. 50,000. The
policy covers hospitalization expenses incurred in India for treatment for illness
diseases and injury sustained or contracted by the insured during the policy period.
It also covers certain day care procedure.
The policy covers loss or damage to the building and its contents including
jewellery, baggage and valuables, domestic appliances likes TV, VCR, Audio
systems, PCs, etc. They also cover accidental injury that result in disability or death
and liabilities to third parties.
MEDICLAIM POLICY:
Expenses incurred by the insured for hospitalization for illness/ diseases or injury
sustained are covered. Domiciliary under the policy.
UNIMEDICARE POLICY:
The policy covers reimbursement of hospitalization expenses because of
illness/ diseases or injury sustained. The Insurance scheme also provides for family
discount in premium, cumulative bonus and cost of health check-up.
Shopkeeper policy.
Burglary policy.
Compact policy.
Floriculture Insurance.
Hurt Insurance.
Raja RajeshwariMahilaKalyanYogana.
Bhagyashree Policy.
RaiaRajeshwari Policy.
Marine Hull.
Marine Cargo.
Deterioration of stock.
Primary data
Secondary data
PRIMARY DATA:
SECONDARY DATA:
Secondary data is collected through journal, Newspaper, feedback form the
employees.
In this study tools used for data collection is questionnaire and observation.
4.4 SAMPLING:-
This study uses the Non- probabilities random sampling technique for analysis the
samples.
Percentage analysis
Chi-square analysis
PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS:-
It is expressed as:
Chi- square test is a statistical measures used in the data of sampling analysis for
comparing a two or more datas in a theorical variance.
HYPOTHESIS:
Hypothesis test is a statistical test that examines two hypotheses about a
population the Null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis.
NULL HYPOTHESIS:
A hypothesis of no different is called null hypothesis and its usually denoted as
H0.
ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS:
Any hypothesis which is compliantly to the null hypothesis is called
an alternative hypothesis. It is usually denoted by H1.
4.6 DEFINITIONS OF IMPORTANT TERM:-
Time consume
No accurate answer.
Lack of output.
Wrong Judgement.
CHAPTER 5
DATA
ANALYSIS&INTERP
ERTATION
TABLE 5.1
1. AGE OF EMPLOYEES
INTERPRETATION:
This table says that 15% of the employees are between the age 25-35, 20% of the
employees are between the age 35 45 and 25% of the employees are between the age
45-55 and 40% of the employees are above the age of 55.
CHART 5.1
AGE OF EMPLOYEE
15%
40%
20%
25%
Male 55 55%
Female 45 45%
INTERPRETATION:
This table shows that 55% of the employees are male and rest 45% of the employees
are female.
CHART 5.2
60
50
40
Series1
30
20
10
0
Male Female
TABLE 5.3
3. INCOME OF EMPLOYEE
INTERPRETATION:
This table shows that 10% of the employees income is between 5,000-10,000,
15% of the employees income is between 10,000-15,000, 25% of the employees income
is between 15,000-20,000, 30% of the employees income is between 20,000-25,000 and
20% of the employees income is above 25,000.
CHART 5.3
INCOME OF EMPLOYEES
35
30
30
25
25
20
20
15 Series1
15
10
10
0
5000-10000 10000-15000 15000-20000 20000-25000 Above 25000
income of employees
TABLE 5.4
4. QUALIFICATION OF EMPLOYEES
Graduate 70 70%
INTERPERTATION:
This table shows that 30%of the employees are qualified in 12th, 70% of the
employees are graduate.
CHART 5.4
QUALIFICATION OF EMPLOYEES
70
60
50
40
70
Series1
30
20
30
10
0
12 th Graduate
Qualification of employee
TABLE 5.5
INTERPERTATION:
This table shows that 30% of the employees are appraised on a monthly base,10%
daily, 20% weekly and 40% annually.
CHART 5.5
40
35
30
25
Series1
20
15
10
0
Annually Monthly Weekly Daily
TABLE 5.6
Yes 25 25%
No 75 75%
INTERPRETATION:
This table shows that 25% of the employees say that methodology is useful in
performances appraisal and 75% of employees say that method is not useful in
performance appraisal.
CHART 5.6
80
70
60
50
40
Series1
30
20
10
0
Yes No
TABLE 5.7
INTERPERTATION:-
This table shows that 30% of the employee method isapprised in cost accounting,
360.of appraisal system, 25% of many by objects and 15% of others.
CHART 5.7
Others
Series1
Cost accounting
Many by objects
0 10 20 30 40 50
TABLE 5.8
INTERPERTATION:
It is inferred that 67% say that the superiors are responsible for conducting the
performance appraisal, 15% say its by all, 10% say its by peer group and 8% say its by
customers.
CHART 5.8
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
TABLE 5.9
INTERPERTATION:-
This table shows that 65% of employees will not inform while appraisal and 5% in
always, 15% in sometimes and partially in 15%.
CHART 5.9
70
60
50
40
Series1
30
20
10
0
Always sometimes Never Partially
TABLE 5.10
INTERPRETATION:
This table shows that 40% of the employees are evaluated through
communication skills, 15% are through product knowledge, 22% through convencing
nature and 23% through confidence.
CHART 5.10
Evaluation of factors
Series1
0 20 40 60 80
TABLE 5.11
INTERPRETATION:
It is found that, 45% of the employees say that rate are highly involved, 20% of the
employees say that rate are less involved, 25% of the employees say that rate are partially
involved and 10% of the employees say that rate is not involved.
CHART 5.11
50
40
30
20
Series1
10
Highly Series1
involved Less
involved Not involved
Partially
TABLE 5.12
Good 45 45%
Neutral 12 12%
Bad 8 8%
INTERPERTATION:
It is found that 35% of the employees say that performance appraisal rate are
excellent in organization, 45% of the employees say that performance appraisal rate are
good in organization, 12% of the employees say that performance appraisal rate are
neutral and 8% of the employees say that performance appraisal rate are bad.
CHART 5.12
12
35
Excellent
Goood
Neutral
Bad
45
TABLE 5.13
INTERPERTATION:
It is found that, 30% of the employees say that performance appraisal is used for
evaluation of employees, 10% of the employees say that performance appraisal is used
for promotion of employees, 20% of the employees say that performance appraisal is
used for job satisfaction and 40% of the employees say that performance appraisal is used
for motivation.
CHART 5.13
45
40
40
35
30
30
25
20 Series1
20
15
10
10
0
Evaluation Promotion jod satisfication Motivation
TABLE 5.14
INTERPRETATION:
It is found that, 65% of the employees say that feedback is calculated once in a
year, 25% of the employees say that feedback is calculated every month and 10% of the
employees say that feedback is calculated every week.
CHART 5.14
70
60
50
40
Series1
30
20
10
0
one year month week
TABLE 5.15
INTERPERTATION:
It is found that, 10% of the employees say that best performer is selected by
counseling, 20% of the employees say that best performer is selected by coaching, 30%
of the employees say that best performer is selected by development and 40% of the
employees say that best performer is selected by training.
CHART 5.15
Traning
Development
Series1
Coaching
Counseling
0 10 20 30 40 50
TABLE 5.16
INTERPERTATION:
It is found that 40% of the employees say that there is excellent working
environment, 35% of the employees say that the environment is good, 10% of the
employees are neutral and 15% of the employees say its bad environment.
CHART 5.16
40 40
35
30
20
10 Series1
10 15
Excellent
Good
Neutral
Bad
TABLE 5.17
INTERPERTATION:
This table shows that 30% of employees consider the top opportunities for them in
the organization is increase market share, 45% of employees consider the top
opportunities for them in the organization is drive customer satisfication, 40% of
employees considering the top opportunities for them in the organization is improve
processes.
CHART 5.17
45
40
35
30
25
Series1
20
15
10
0
Increase market Drive customer Improve processes
share satisfication
TABLE 5.18
INTERPERTATION:
It is found that, 35% of the employees say that salary increment is the success for
them in the organization, 20% of the employees say allowance, 30% of the employees
say promotion and 15% of the employees say other reasons.
CHART 5.18
40
30
20
10 Series1
Salary
Allowance
Promotion
Others
TABLE 5.19
INTERPERTATION:
It is found that, 10% of the employees say that the contribution of team work is to
give valuable points, 15% of the employees say co- ordination, 30% of the employees say
decision making and 45% of the employees say problem analysis.
CHART 5.19
50
40 45
30 30
20 10 15
10
0
Series1
TABLE 5.20
INTERPERTATION:
It is found that, 30% of the employees say that increment is granted based on
overtime, 30% of the employees say length of service, 35% of employees say general and
5% of employees say cost of living.
CHART 5.20
5
30
35
30
INTERPERTATION:
It is found that 55% of the employees say that it takes 30 days for involvement of
new employees, 25% of the employees say it takes 60 days for involvement of new
employees, 10% of the employees say it take 90 days for the involvement of new
employees and 10% of the employees say that there is no involvement of new employees.
CHART 5.21
None
90
days
Series1
60
days
30
days
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
TABLE 5.22
INTERPERTATION:
It is found that, 45% of the employees say that the biggest achievement in the
organization is getting promotion, 40% of the employees say increment and 15% of the
employees say others.
CHART 5.22
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
increment other promotion
TABLE 5.23
INTERPERTATION:
It is found that 8% of the employees say that they use performance appraisal for
retention of employees, 12% of the employees say that they use performance appraisal
for recruitment system, 35% of the employees say that they use performance appraisal for
organizational culture and 45% of the employees say that they use performance appraisal
for motivation.
CHART 5.23
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
Retention of Recruitment Organixation Motivation
employees system culture
TABLE 5.24
INTERPERTATION:
It is found that, 5% of the employees say that they used 360 degree appraisal
recently, 25% of the employees say that they use 360 degree appraisal more than one
year, 40% of the employees say that they use 360 degree appraisal less than one year and
30% of the employees say that they use 360 degree appraisal when inception occur.
CHART 5.24
5
30
25
40
Recently More one year Less than one year He inception of 360 process
TEST OF HYPOTHESIS:
Grand total
T= TOTAL
E= T* A/ C
E = T* B/ C
E1 = 75*100/200 = 37.5
E2 = 80*100/200 = 40.0
E3 = 22*100/200 = 11.0
E4 = 23*100/200 = 11.5
CHI- SQUARE TEST:
X2= ((O-E)2/ E)
O = Observed frequency
E = Expected frequency
There is no association between the classification based on year of service and the
classification based level of satisfaction.
There is association between the classification based on year of service and the
classification based level of satisfaction.
X2 = ((O-E)2/ E)
EXPECTED FREQUENCY
= (2-1) (4-1)
= (1) (3)
=3
DF= 3
TV > CV
H1 is accepted
It is found that performance appraisal rate watcher with working environmental of the
company.
CHAPTER 6
SUMMARY OF
FINDINGs AND
SUGGESTIONs
CHAPTER 6
FINDINGS
30% of the employees are earning high salary in United India Insurance.
It is found that 40% of the employees say that they are appraised annually.
40% of the employees say that best performers are selected through training.
40% of the employees say that the work environment of the company is neutral.
45% of the employees say that the opportunities for them in the organization drive
customer satisfaction.
35% of the employees say that salary increment is the success for them in the
organization.
45% of the employees say that the contribution of the team work is to give problem
analysis.
40% of the employees say that employees are appraised on monthly basis.
45% of the employees say that performance appraisal is calculated based on 360
appraisals.
67% of the employees say that superior is responsible for conducting the performance
appraisal program.
65% of the employees say that employees will not be informed about the performance
appraisal.
SUGGESTIONS
Employees are saying that performance appraisal develops and polished the skill.
Employees are saying that there is improvement after the performance appraisal.
Some of the respondents disagree that performance appraisal helps to set goals and to
explores their talents.
It is suggested that the company must provide job opportunities to every employees that
only employees that only employees will work effectively.
40% of respondent are developing the skill so rest of 60% of workers must develop the
skills and knowledge.
CONCLUSION
Performance Appraisal and employee promotion policy being a core theme of the study,
have been covered in detail. There appears to be certain shortcomings in the existing
performance appraisal and employee promotion policy of the selected United India
Insurance Companies.
The study also presents a model, revealing the performance of the United India Insurance
Companies and showcasing their speed of involvement resulting into high.
Thus, the study shows that it found that the overall level of performance Appraisal of the
employees is satisfied.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BOOKS REFERED:
WEBSITE REFERED:
www.reference.com
www.performance appraisal.com
www.wikipedia.org
ANNEXURE
QUESTIONNAIRE
1. NAME:
2. Age
a) 20-30
b) 30-40
c) 40-50
d) 50-60
3. Gender
a) Male
b) female
4. Income
a) 5,000- 10,000
b) 10,000- 15,000
c) 20,000- 25,000
d) Above 25,000
5. Qualification
a) 12th
b) Graduate
6. How often you appraise your employees?
a) Annually
b) Monthly
c) Weekly
d) Daily
a) Yes
b) No
a) Many by objects
b) Cost accounting
c) 360.Appraisal system
d) Others
a) Superior
b) Customer
c) Peers
d) All
a) Always
b) Sometimes
c) Never
d) Partially
11. Are the performance appraisal of the employees is conducted by considering and evaluating
which of the following factor
a) Communication skills
b) Product knowledge
c) Convincing nature
d) Confidence
a) Excellent
b) Good
c) Better
d) Bad
a) Evaluation of employees
b) Promotion of employees
c) Job satisfaction of employees
d) Motivation.
a) One year
b) Month
c) Week
a) Counseling
b) Coaching
c) Development
d) Training
a) Excellent
b) Good
c) Neutral
d) Bad
18. What do you see as the top opportunities for us to increase our organization performance?
19. What do you feel your greatest win/success has been over the past 6 months?
a) Salary increment
b) Allowance
c) Promotion
d) Others
20. What have been you contribution in the team work or the total goal?
a) Valuable points
b) Co- ordination
c) Decision-making
d) Problem analysis
a) Overtime
b) Length of service
c) General
d) Cost of living
22. In your opinion performance appraisal system of your organization is related to which of the
following?
a) Retention of employees
b) Recruitment system
c) Organizational culture
d) Motivation
a) Promotion
b) Increment
c) Others
a) 30 days
b) 60 days
c) 90 days
d) None
a) Recently
b) More than one year
c) Less than one year
d) His inception of 360.process