Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

People vs. Estonillo, Sr. Facts

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

PEOPLE VS. ESTONILLO, SR.

He stopped and saw 4 persons holding short firearms:


Nonoy and Negro are the two who fired at Floro about
FACTS: seven times, while Edel and Nonong are the other two gun
- The prosecution presented 9 witnesses. The following holders.
are their testimonies:
Gali, another member of the group, shouted "enough,"
(1) FELIX - son of Floro. on April 4, 2005, day before and he was with Ace, Titing and Bulldog. After shouting,
Floro (his father) was gunned down, Felix and Floro went they hurriedly left.
to Ranio's house to see Mayor Carlos Sr.
Mayor Carlos' vehicle arrived where Rey alighted from
He was summoned by Mayor Carlos because in a program and, with Negro, they watched the proceedings. Mayor
of a celebration the Federation of 7th Day Adventist, the Carlos asked them to leave and they all left.
names of the governor, congressman, and Placer
(6) ELSA - wife of Floro.let it go let it go cant hold it back
Mayoralty Candidate Vicente Cotero were there. Mayor
anymore charot hahahaha. She testified on the probable
Carlos' name was not mentioned. Floro contended that
motive of the killing of Floro. She said that there were
Cotero paid for the program and this angered Mayor
people who were jealous of Floro's position because he
Carlos.
could bring voters to his side during election time.
Prior to April 4, 2005, Felix recounted that on he had a
Placer mayoralty candidate Cotero donated medals in the
drinking spree with Nonoy's group in a videoke bar.
school. Donor's name was announced in the closing
Afterwards, Edel brought them to the house of Bobong.
ceremony and this angered Mayor Carlos.
Thereat, Rey uttered that Felix's father, a District
Supervisor, has a big role in COMELEC's choice for the When Floro was processig a voucher to be signed by
members of the Board of Election Inspectors. Mayor Carlos, Mayor Carlos did not sign it and even
threw the vouched on the floor. Diego Cases only helped
(2) DR. FRANCISCO - he conducted the Post Mortem
Floro secure Mayor's signature.
Examination on the dead body of Floro. He was also the
one who prepared the Certificate of Death. He also (7) DIEGO - he corroborated Elsa's testimony about the
recovered three slugs. signature of the voucher.
He added that Floro sustained gunshot wounds caused by (8) ROSALINDA - Mayor Carlos went to her house and
more than 1 firearm based on the sizes of the slugs told her that he would kill her husband (Cotero) following
recovered and that some of them were fired at close range. Floro. She reported the incident to Cotero and to the
Placer Police Station.
(3) SPO4 LEPATAN - he prepared the Police Report
relative to the police blotter for the shooting incident that (9) SERVANDO - he testified that when he was in the
happened at Celera Elementary School. house of Mayor Carlos, he heard Mayor's group planned
to kill Floro at Celera Elementary School.
(4) SERAPION - he testified that while he was printing
the name of Municipal Mayor Candidate Boy Dela Pisa However, Servando filed an Affidavit of Retraction
on the street facing the Celera Elementary School, he withdrawing his Sinumpaang Salaysay relative to the
heard gunshot wounds coming from the compound of the incident involving the death of Floro. But after redirect
school. examination, he testified that he was brought to Atty.
Besario who asked him to signed the Affidavit of
After 2-3 minutes, he saw more or less six persons coming
Retraction, which he did not understand as it was written
out of the school. He was able to identify three of them as
in English.
Edel, Nonoy, and Nonong.
- DEFENSE: the posited alibi and denial.
The 6 men approached Mayor Carlos, Sr's vehicle and he
heard Nonoy said "mission accomplished sir" to Mayor - SUM OF PROSECUTION'S TESTIMONY: There
Carlos. They all left the area. were 9 witnesses presented. The testimonies of Serapion
and Antipolo were given credence by the court since it
(5) ANTIPOLO - he heard gunshot wounds while riding
corroborated each other. They were able to identify the
his motorcycle and passing the gate of the school and
accused especially those who gunned down Floro. The
someone shouted that Floro was shot.
accused's defense of alibi and denial did not withstand the
positive identification of the prosecution witnesses.
- CRIME CHARGED: Murder with Direct Assault - Moreover, when the assault results in the killing of that
against: agent or of a person in authority for that matter, there
arises the complex crime of direct assault with murder or
1. Nonoy -at large
homicide.
2. Titing -at large
- (1) Rey, (2) Edel, (3) Nonong, and (4) Bulldog are
3. Gali -at large convicted of the crime of murder with direct assault; while
Ex Mayor Carlos Sr died in the New Bilibid Prison
4. Negro -separate trial is necessary
5. Ex Mayor Carlos Sr
6. Mayor Rey
7. Edel
8. Nonong
9. Bulldog
- RTC RULING: guilty as charged. Convicted
- CA RULING: guilty. Affirmed RTC's ruling
SC RULING:
- Affirmed the lower court's decision. Convicted of
Murder with Direct Assault.
- There are two modes of committing direct assault under
Art.148. Accused-appellants committed the second form
of assault. The elements are:
1. The offender makes an attack, employs force, makes
serious intimidation or serious resistance
2. Assault is against a person in authority or an agent of a
person in authority
3. At the time of the assault, the person in authority was
performing his duties or on the occasion of such
performance
4. The accused knew that the victim is a person in
authority or his agent, that is, that the accused must have
the intention to offend, injure, or assault the offended
party as a person in authority or an agent of a person in
authority.
- In the case at bar, Floro was the duly appointed District
Supervisor of Public Schools in Placer, Masbate, thus was
a person in authority. But contrary to the statement of the
RTC that there was a direct assault just because Floro was
a person in authority, this Court clarifies that the finding
of direct assault is based on the fact that the attack or
assault on Floro was, in reality, made by reason of the
performance of his duty as the District Supervisor.

You might also like