The prosecution presented 9 witnesses who testified that Mayor Carlos Sr and others gunned down Floro, the District Supervisor of Public Schools, due to political tensions. Witnesses identified the attackers and heard them say "mission accomplished" to Mayor Carlos after. The court found the defendants guilty of murder with direct assault, which occurs when force or intimidation is used against a person in authority during their duties. Rey, Edel, Nonong, and Bulldog were convicted, while Mayor Carlos Sr died in prison before trial.
The prosecution presented 9 witnesses who testified that Mayor Carlos Sr and others gunned down Floro, the District Supervisor of Public Schools, due to political tensions. Witnesses identified the attackers and heard them say "mission accomplished" to Mayor Carlos after. The court found the defendants guilty of murder with direct assault, which occurs when force or intimidation is used against a person in authority during their duties. Rey, Edel, Nonong, and Bulldog were convicted, while Mayor Carlos Sr died in prison before trial.
The prosecution presented 9 witnesses who testified that Mayor Carlos Sr and others gunned down Floro, the District Supervisor of Public Schools, due to political tensions. Witnesses identified the attackers and heard them say "mission accomplished" to Mayor Carlos after. The court found the defendants guilty of murder with direct assault, which occurs when force or intimidation is used against a person in authority during their duties. Rey, Edel, Nonong, and Bulldog were convicted, while Mayor Carlos Sr died in prison before trial.
The prosecution presented 9 witnesses who testified that Mayor Carlos Sr and others gunned down Floro, the District Supervisor of Public Schools, due to political tensions. Witnesses identified the attackers and heard them say "mission accomplished" to Mayor Carlos after. The court found the defendants guilty of murder with direct assault, which occurs when force or intimidation is used against a person in authority during their duties. Rey, Edel, Nonong, and Bulldog were convicted, while Mayor Carlos Sr died in prison before trial.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
PEOPLE VS. ESTONILLO, SR.
He stopped and saw 4 persons holding short firearms:
Nonoy and Negro are the two who fired at Floro about FACTS: seven times, while Edel and Nonong are the other two gun - The prosecution presented 9 witnesses. The following holders. are their testimonies: Gali, another member of the group, shouted "enough," (1) FELIX - son of Floro. on April 4, 2005, day before and he was with Ace, Titing and Bulldog. After shouting, Floro (his father) was gunned down, Felix and Floro went they hurriedly left. to Ranio's house to see Mayor Carlos Sr. Mayor Carlos' vehicle arrived where Rey alighted from He was summoned by Mayor Carlos because in a program and, with Negro, they watched the proceedings. Mayor of a celebration the Federation of 7th Day Adventist, the Carlos asked them to leave and they all left. names of the governor, congressman, and Placer (6) ELSA - wife of Floro.let it go let it go cant hold it back Mayoralty Candidate Vicente Cotero were there. Mayor anymore charot hahahaha. She testified on the probable Carlos' name was not mentioned. Floro contended that motive of the killing of Floro. She said that there were Cotero paid for the program and this angered Mayor people who were jealous of Floro's position because he Carlos. could bring voters to his side during election time. Prior to April 4, 2005, Felix recounted that on he had a Placer mayoralty candidate Cotero donated medals in the drinking spree with Nonoy's group in a videoke bar. school. Donor's name was announced in the closing Afterwards, Edel brought them to the house of Bobong. ceremony and this angered Mayor Carlos. Thereat, Rey uttered that Felix's father, a District Supervisor, has a big role in COMELEC's choice for the When Floro was processig a voucher to be signed by members of the Board of Election Inspectors. Mayor Carlos, Mayor Carlos did not sign it and even threw the vouched on the floor. Diego Cases only helped (2) DR. FRANCISCO - he conducted the Post Mortem Floro secure Mayor's signature. Examination on the dead body of Floro. He was also the one who prepared the Certificate of Death. He also (7) DIEGO - he corroborated Elsa's testimony about the recovered three slugs. signature of the voucher. He added that Floro sustained gunshot wounds caused by (8) ROSALINDA - Mayor Carlos went to her house and more than 1 firearm based on the sizes of the slugs told her that he would kill her husband (Cotero) following recovered and that some of them were fired at close range. Floro. She reported the incident to Cotero and to the Placer Police Station. (3) SPO4 LEPATAN - he prepared the Police Report relative to the police blotter for the shooting incident that (9) SERVANDO - he testified that when he was in the happened at Celera Elementary School. house of Mayor Carlos, he heard Mayor's group planned to kill Floro at Celera Elementary School. (4) SERAPION - he testified that while he was printing the name of Municipal Mayor Candidate Boy Dela Pisa However, Servando filed an Affidavit of Retraction on the street facing the Celera Elementary School, he withdrawing his Sinumpaang Salaysay relative to the heard gunshot wounds coming from the compound of the incident involving the death of Floro. But after redirect school. examination, he testified that he was brought to Atty. Besario who asked him to signed the Affidavit of After 2-3 minutes, he saw more or less six persons coming Retraction, which he did not understand as it was written out of the school. He was able to identify three of them as in English. Edel, Nonoy, and Nonong. - DEFENSE: the posited alibi and denial. The 6 men approached Mayor Carlos, Sr's vehicle and he heard Nonoy said "mission accomplished sir" to Mayor - SUM OF PROSECUTION'S TESTIMONY: There Carlos. They all left the area. were 9 witnesses presented. The testimonies of Serapion and Antipolo were given credence by the court since it (5) ANTIPOLO - he heard gunshot wounds while riding corroborated each other. They were able to identify the his motorcycle and passing the gate of the school and accused especially those who gunned down Floro. The someone shouted that Floro was shot. accused's defense of alibi and denial did not withstand the positive identification of the prosecution witnesses. - CRIME CHARGED: Murder with Direct Assault - Moreover, when the assault results in the killing of that against: agent or of a person in authority for that matter, there arises the complex crime of direct assault with murder or 1. Nonoy -at large homicide. 2. Titing -at large - (1) Rey, (2) Edel, (3) Nonong, and (4) Bulldog are 3. Gali -at large convicted of the crime of murder with direct assault; while Ex Mayor Carlos Sr died in the New Bilibid Prison 4. Negro -separate trial is necessary 5. Ex Mayor Carlos Sr 6. Mayor Rey 7. Edel 8. Nonong 9. Bulldog - RTC RULING: guilty as charged. Convicted - CA RULING: guilty. Affirmed RTC's ruling SC RULING: - Affirmed the lower court's decision. Convicted of Murder with Direct Assault. - There are two modes of committing direct assault under Art.148. Accused-appellants committed the second form of assault. The elements are: 1. The offender makes an attack, employs force, makes serious intimidation or serious resistance 2. Assault is against a person in authority or an agent of a person in authority 3. At the time of the assault, the person in authority was performing his duties or on the occasion of such performance 4. The accused knew that the victim is a person in authority or his agent, that is, that the accused must have the intention to offend, injure, or assault the offended party as a person in authority or an agent of a person in authority. - In the case at bar, Floro was the duly appointed District Supervisor of Public Schools in Placer, Masbate, thus was a person in authority. But contrary to the statement of the RTC that there was a direct assault just because Floro was a person in authority, this Court clarifies that the finding of direct assault is based on the fact that the attack or assault on Floro was, in reality, made by reason of the performance of his duty as the District Supervisor.