Guide 7 To Sustainable Procurement: Manage The Contract and Disposal Route
Guide 7 To Sustainable Procurement: Manage The Contract and Disposal Route
Guide 7 To Sustainable Procurement: Manage The Contract and Disposal Route
Guide 7 to Sustainable
Procurement
Manage the contract and disposal
route
1040588
This guide is part of a series of documents focussed on Integrating Sustainable Procurement into
Practice. This material was developed by Sustainable Procurement Limited for the United
Nations Marrakech Taskforce for Sustainable Procurement of which the New Zealand
government is a member. The series is based around a typical procurement process with a guide
for each relevant stage as identified below:
Identify need
& assess risk
Guide 2
Manage the
contract & Evaluate &
disposal route select suppliers
Guide 7 Guide 3
Identifying
sustainable
procurement
priorities
Audit & Guide 1
Define the
improve Start specification &
supplier invite bids
Guide 6 Guide 4
Evaluate bids
from suppliers
& award
Guide 5
Please see the separate guidance notes referenced for other stages of the procurement process.
Crown This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 New Zealand License. In
essence you are free to copy, distribute and adapt the work noncommercially, as long as you attribute the work to the
Copyright Crown and abide by the other licence terms.
To view a copy of this license, visit http://www.creativecommons.org.nz Please note that no departmental or
governmental emblem, logo or Coat of Arms may be used in any way that infringes any provision of the Flags, Emblems,
and Names Protection Act 1981. Attribution to the Crown should be in written form and not by reproduction of any such
emblem, logo or Coat of Arms.
1040588
3
Contents page
Background ....................................................................................................................... 4
Introduction........................................................................................................................ 4
Summary......................................................................................................................... 10
Whilst referencing inter-linked procurement stages, this guide focuses on contract management
to manage sustainability impacts. This is primarily informed through a sustainability risk
assessment and by the specification set for the particular contract need. See Guide 2 Identify
Need and Assess Risk and Guide 4 Define the Specification and Invite Bids. Sustainability risks
that are best managed by on-going supplier performance criteria applied after the contract has
been awarded are illustrated as well as the principles of motivating the supplier to deliver
continuous improvement over the life of the contract.
Except for very routine procurements all contracts will need to be managed, mainly to ensure that
the supplier keeps to the commitments they made in their bid. The supplier and procurer have
legal contractual obligations, effective contract management ensures that commitments are met
and that any problems are managed and dealt with quickly. From a sustainability perspective,
contract management ensures suppliers meet their sustainability commitments, but also creates a
mechanism to improve performance through use of performance indicators. If practiced
successfully, procurers will be able to show continuous improvement and demonstrate successful
delivery of sustainable procurement to all stakeholders.
The guide is structured by subject, so it can either be read fully in order to obtain a complete
overview of the issues in bid evaluation or the reader can jump to a specific subject area (see
above). However, the guide does follow a logical order so it is recommended to start at the
beginning and work through to avoid any confusion.
Introduction
Having awarded the contract to the successful supplier it is important that the contract is
managed to ensure that the supplier meets the commitments they gave in their bid proposal.
Effective contract management is particularly important for longer-term contracts where the
buying and supplying organisations will be working together for many years. Unfortunately
contract management is an area of procurement that is often neglected and can lead to
frustration for all parties. As with other guidance, the approach to contract management can be
linked again to the category of the contract on the sustainable procurement matrix:
Whilst all contracts need to be managed, it is particularly important for high-risk contracts as the
items being supplied have high sustainability impacts and are often essential purchases for the
Contract management normally begins with a face-to-face contract commencement meeting with
the supplier. Thereafter, the way in which the supplier is managed (review meetings, progress
reports etc) is influenced by the nature of the contract. Milestones should be established and
reviewed, and performance assessed against pre-agreed performance measures. The
performance criteria used to manage the contract will have been determined at the risk
assessment and contract strategy stage. See Guide 2 Identify Need and Assess Risk.
Option 1: The risk cannot be managed and is therefore not addressed (these risks
need to be closely monitored)
Option 5: The risk is managed either by targets to be delivered once the contract
has been awarded or generally as part of contract management activity
Each contract will typically employ a range of these management options. For risks that can only
be managed by option 5, (targets to be delivered once the contract has been awarded or
generally as part of contract management activity) a set of performance measures and a contract
management approach needs to be determined. The measures used in contract management
should relate directly back to the risk assessment undertaken at the start of the contract, the
clauses/questions asked in the specification supplemented by any additional commitments made
by the supplier in negotiation.
As highlighted in Guide 4 Define the Specification and Invite Bids B10, sustainability criteria can
be applied at all stages of the procurement process. As an example, see below sustainability
criteria to manage carbon-dioxide/particulate emissions from travel in a computer services
contract. Pay particular attention to the way the criteria become more specific and more dificult
between supplier selection and specification. Also note that the bid evaluation criteria highlighted
have a direct link to clauses/questions in the specification. Similarly, contract management criteria
also link back to both specification and bid evaluation criteria and provide the method by which
compliance is monitored and continuous improvement encouraged.
See Appendix 1 for a detailed sustainability risk assessment document showing sustainability
criteria and specifically the contract management criteria. This appendix shows the range of
sustainability criteria that can be applied and clearly demonstrates how criteria build-up through
the procurement process.
Leading - Limit these to as few issues as possible. These issues will really
differentiate suppliers performance and separate the exceptional
suppliers from the ordinary. These targets are usually difficult to
achieve and are often linked to some form of bonus payment for a
supplier.
By categorising measures, procurers are in effect setting the boundaries by which the suppliers
overall performance will be judged. This gives a very clear structure and allows decisions to be
made about a suppliers continued use within an organisation depending on their performance.
For each contract it is necessary to determine the sustainability risks, identify how the risks are
best managed and for those that need on-going management develop specific performance
management criteria. Supplier performance against these specific criteria are then reviewed as
part of the contract management process. Giving a much more meaningful approach to contract
management than just a general discussion about performance. Sustainability measures such as
those highlighted above are also useful in demonstrating the sustainable procurement
improvement being delivered.
Procurers may seek to add additional measurement criteria or give tougher targets for which the
supplier receives a bonus payment. This can be self-funding in areas such as energy efficiency
etc where there is a reduced cost to the client. Another option is to link contract extensions to
Procurers need to ensure that suppliers targeted for this approach, actually value their business,
otherwise it will be difficult to improve performance. To check this an assessment of the suppliers
view of you as a client should have been undertaken. See Guide 2 Identify Need and Assess
Risk.
It must however be recognised that back-to-back contracts are only usually used for higher risk/
value contracts as they are often not popular with suppliers. So there use should be considered
carefully and only applied in higher risk/ value contracts where there are concerns about
sustainability beyond the main supplier down the supply chain. If this approach is taken it will be
necessary to add additional performance measures into the contract so that the supplier reports
on their suppliers performance also.
Summary
Effective contract management and the setting of sustainability criteria will support sustainability
improvement. Performance management criteria are essential to this as they provide the
measures by which the suppliers progress will be judged. It can however, be quite challenging to
determine these criteria, but the risk assessment undertaken at the start of the contract will inform
this. Suppliers may be resistant to these targets, so early engagement is essential. Suppliers
should be asked for their measurement proposals and these can then be used as part of bid
evaluation as a indication of their commitment to improved sustainability. These initial proposals
can then also form the basis of negotiation to agree specific targets.
Procurers also need to consider the consequences of suppliers performance, will rewards be
given for improved performance and/or a contract extension and will penalties be payable if the
supplier fails. If risk and reward mechanisms are being used procurers will need to ensure that
the criteria are measurable and fair, but also tough enough that suppliers are only rewarded for
improved/exceptional performance.
Contract management requires long-term commitment and time to build the working relationship
between the procurer and supplier and is often neglected by many organisations. If an
organisation is to truly deliver sustainable procurement it must ensure that its suppliers deliver the
sustainability commitments made, improve performance and that results are measurable. This will
ensure that the procuring organisation can show sustainability improvement and demonstrate its
true commitment to sustainable procurement.
1
A supply chain, logistics network, or supply network is a coordinated system of organisations, people, activities, information
and resources involved in moving a product or service in physical or virtual manner from supplier to customer. Supply chain
activities (aka value chains or life cycle processes) transform raw materials and components into a finished product that is
delivered to the end customer. Referenced - Wikipedia 2007.
Guide 7: Sustainable Procurement Manage the contract and disposal route
1040588