Case IBM - 1
Case IBM - 1
Case IBM - 1
IBM was founded in 1888 as human Hollerith and the tabulating machine
company. Its name was later changed to IBM in 1942 when it became a
Fortune 500 company. It is known to have more patents than any other
American tech company. It was taken by the US government at the beginning of
World War-II in the war effort and given a one percent profile, which is used to
fund war victims and orphans.
IBM was one of the leader brands of I.T industry which is basically related to
computing various dimension of technology whether is about gadget or the
software. It developed products from punch-card tabulating machines to room
sized calculators and main frame computers.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers: in the most areas of IBM, there are number of
a supplier which makes the power of suppliers low.
Competitive Rivalry: it is high as there are large companies like HP, Microsoft
and EDS to compete IBM.
SWOT Analysis:
Strengths: brand name. Rising revenue to 91 billion and rising net income to
$9.4 billion. Diversification (Software, Hardware, Financing). Acquisition of
Watchfire Company 2007. Innovation Jam capability. Ranks second in market
capitalization, net income, and long-term growth behind Microsoft. Widespread
operations in 170 countries. Rising earnings per share (23% in 2006).
Weakness: lack of synergy resulting from a serial of acquisitions and
divestitures. Difficult to coordinate over four geographical segments. Too many
employees (around 4, 00,000). Concentration or focus on three major divisions
or segments puts the company at a vulnerable position if revenue from them
decline. Declining profit margins from hardware (-7.6%)
CONCLUSION:
The study shows that IBM has ample room for improvement in its internal and
external environment. The fact that the company needs to further strengthen its
brand image can be done through exploiting potential markets in the long run.
In addition, IBM has some loss making departments which are a burden on the
company. The company has not yet come up with any strategy to divestiture
such departments. There is room for improvement IBM needs to reinstate its
linc for brands through effective advertisements around the global market.
SUGGESTIONS: