Tañada vs. Tuvera, 136 SCRA 27 (1985)
Tañada vs. Tuvera, 136 SCRA 27 (1985)
Tañada vs. Tuvera, 136 SCRA 27 (1985)
TUVERA
FACTS:
Invoking the right of the people to be informed on matters of public concern as well as the principle
that laws to be valid and enforceable must be published in the Official Gazette, petitioners filed
for writ of mandamus to compel respondent public officials to publish and/or cause to publish
various presidential decrees, letters of instructions, general orders, proclamations, executive
orders, letters of implementations and administrative orders.
The Solicitor General, representing the respondents, moved for the dismissal of the case,
contending that petitioners have no legal personality to bring the instant petition.
ISSUE:
Whether or not publication in the Official Gazette is required before any law or statute becomes
valid and enforceable.
HELD:
Art. 2 of the Civil Code does not preclude the requirement of publication in the Official Gazette,
even if the law itself provides for the date of its effectivity. The clear object of this provision is to
give the general public adequate notice of the various laws which are to regulate their actions and
conduct as citizens. Without such notice and publication, there would be no basis for the
application of the maxim ignoratia legis nominem excusat. It would be the height of injustive to
punish or otherwise burden a citizen for the transgression of a law which he had no notice
whatsoever, not even a constructive one.
The very first clause of Section 1 of CA 638 reads: there shall be published in the Official
Gazette. The word shall therein imposes upon respondent officials an imperative duty. That
duty must be enforced if the constitutional right of the people to be informed on matter of public
concern is to be given substance and validity.
FACTS:
Petitioners seek a writ of mandamus in compelling respondent public officials to publish and/ or
cause the publication in the Official Gazette of various presidential decrees, letter of instructions,
general orders, proclamations, executive orders, letter of implementation and administrative
orders.
The general rule in seeking writ of mandamus is that it would be granted to a private individual
only in those cases where he has some private or particular interest to be subserved, or some
particular right to be protected, independent of that which he holds with the public at large," and
"it is for the public officers exclusively to apply for the writ when public rights are to be subserved.
The legal capacity of a private citizen was recognized by court to make the said petition for the
reason that the right sought to be enforced by petitioners herein is a public right recognized by no
less than the fundamental law of the land.
ISSUE: Whether publication in the Official Gazette is still required considering the clause in Article
2 unless otherwise provided.
HELD:
Unless it is otherwise provided refers to the date of effectivity and not with the publication
requirement which cannot be omitted as public needs to be notified for the law to become
effective. The necessity for the publication in the Official Gazette of all unpublished presidential
issuances which are of general application, was affirmed by the court on April 24, 1985. This is
necessary to provide the general public adequate notice of the various laws which regulate
actions and conduct as citizens. Without this, there would be no basis for Art 3 of the Civil Code
Ignorance of the law excuses no one from compliance therewith.
WHEREFORE, the Court hereby orders respondents to publish in the Official Gazette all
unpublished presidential issuances which are of general application, and unless so published,
they shall have no binding force and effect.