Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 144 views

    PDR, CDR

    Uploaded by

    Karthikeyan Varathan
    The document outlines guidelines for three types of reviews of MMA subsystems: (1) Preliminary Design Review (PDR) is held early in the design phase to review requirements, design solutions, and procurement plans. (2) Critical Design Review (CDR) is held before equipment construction to review detailed requirements, design implementation, and interfaces. (3) Pre-Production Review (PPR) is held before quantity production to review design/testing maturity and production plans. All reviews include outside experts, relevant project members, and impacted divisions. Minutes and responses to issues are documented.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    PDR, CDR

    Uploaded by

    Karthikeyan Varathan
    144 views2 pages
    The document outlines guidelines for three types of reviews of MMA subsystems: (1) Preliminary Design Review (PDR) is held early in the design phase to review requirements, design solutions, and procurement plans. (2) Critical Design Review (CDR) is held before equipment construction to review detailed requirements, design implementation, and interfaces. (3) Pre-Production Review (PPR) is held before quantity production to review design/testing maturity and production plans. All reviews include outside experts, relevant project members, and impacted divisions. Minutes and responses to issues are documented.

    Original Description:

    PDR,CDR

    Original Title

    PDR,CDR

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document outlines guidelines for three types of reviews of MMA subsystems: (1) Preliminary Design Review (PDR) is held early in the design phase to review requirements, design solutions, and procurement plans. (2) Critical Design Review (CDR) is held before equipment construction to review detailed requirements, design implementation, and interfaces. (3) Pre-Production Review (PPR) is held before quantity production to review design/testing maturity and production plans. All reviews include outside experts, relevant project members, and impacted divisions. Minutes and responses to issues are documented.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    144 views2 pages

    PDR, CDR

    Uploaded by

    Karthikeyan Varathan
    The document outlines guidelines for three types of reviews of MMA subsystems: (1) Preliminary Design Review (PDR) is held early in the design phase to review requirements, design solutions, and procurement plans. (2) Critical Design Review (CDR) is held before equipment construction to review detailed requirements, design implementation, and interfaces. (3) Pre-Production Review (PPR) is held before quantity production to review design/testing maturity and production plans. All reviews include outside experts, relevant project members, and impacted divisions. Minutes and responses to issues are documented.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    MMA199901-0010

    PDR, CDR, and Pre-Production Review Guidelines

    Version 2 - 98November09
    P. J. Napier

    Preliminary Design Review (PDR)

    To be held early enough in the D&D Phase so that a change in direction is still possible if the need for such
    a change is identified by the review.

    The purpose of the PDR of an MMA Subsystem is principally to review 3 questions:

    (1) Are the top level performance requirements for the subsystem complete and adequate?

    (2) Have the correct design solutions been selected for study and development during the MMA
    D&D Phase? Are there important alternate solutions that are not being studied.

    (3) If a major procurement is required for the subsystem during the MMA D&D Phase, is the
    procurement plan correct?

    The PDR will be organized and chaired by the MMA Division Head responsible for the subsystem. The
    Review Board will include the following:

    (a) At least 2 experts from outside the MMA Project. In the event that the Review cannot be
    scheduled because of difficulty in arranging the attendance of a second expert, it will be
    acceptable to solicit the opinions of the second expert in writing after his/her review of all of the
    materials presented at the Review.

    (b) The Project Manager and/or the Project Systems Engineer.

    (c) The Project Scientist or his/her designee.

    (d) At least one representative of any MMA Division potentially impacted by the design of the
    subsystem.

    Critical Design Review (CDR)

    To be held before expenditure of significant funds on the construction of field equipment which will be
    incorporated into the test interferometer.

    The purpose of the CDR of an MMA Subsystem is principally to review 3 questions:

    (1) Are the detailed requirements for the subsystem complete and adequate?

    (2) Will the design selected for implementation on the test array meet the requirements?

    (3) Are interfaces to other subsystems defined adequately and completely?

    (4) Has adequate attention been given to the produceability and maintainability of the subsystem?

    Meeting organization and attendance to be the same as a PDR.


    Pre-Production Review (PPR)

    To be held before commencement of the quantity production of the subsystem.

    The purpose of the Pre-Production Review of an MMA Subsystem is principally to review the 2 questions:

    (1) Is the design, prototyping and testing of the subsystem sufficiently mature to warrant its
    production in large quantities?

    (2) Are the production plans for the equipment correct?

    Meeting organization and attendance to be same as a PDR.

    Review Documentation (All Reviews)

    (1) Minutes will be kept of the Review.

    (2) As the last activity of the Review all Review Board members will be asked to answer the key
    questions and to identify any important Issues.

    (3) The responsible Division Head must arrange for written responses to all Issues within one month
    of the Review. These responses will become part of the Review documentation package.

    (4) It is the responsibility of the MMA Project Manager to determine what further action is required
    as follow-up to the Issues and Responses.

    You might also like