Trans Asia vs. NLRC
Trans Asia vs. NLRC
Trans Asia vs. NLRC
Facts:
On 7 July 1988, Trans-Asia Philippines Employees Association (TAPEA) entered into a Collective Bargaining
Agreement (CBA) with their employer. The CBA provided for, among others, the payment of holiday pay
with a stipulation that if an employee is permitted to work on a legal holiday, the said employee will
receive a salary equivalent to 200% of the regular daily wage plus a 60% premium pay.
Despite the conclusion of the CBA, however, an issue was still left unresolved with regard to the claim of
TAPEA for payment of holiday pay. Since the parties were not able to arrive at an amicable settlement
despite the conciliation meetings, TAPEA, led by its President, petitioner Arnie Galvez, filed a complaint
for the payment of their holiday pay in arrears. On 18 September 1988, petitioners amended their
complaint to include the payment of holiday pay for the duration of the recently concluded CBA (from
1988 to 1991), unfair labor practice, damages and attorneys fees.
In their Position Paper, TAPEA contended that their claim for holiday pay in arrears is based on the non-
inclusion of the same in their monthly pay.
In response, Trans-Asia contended that it has always honored the labor law provisions on holiday pay by
incorporating the same in the payment of the monthly salaries of its employees. In support of this claim,
Trans-Asia pointed out that it has long been the standing practice of the company to use the divisor of
286 days in computing for its employees overtime pay and daily rate deductions for absences.
52 x 44 / 8 = 286 days
Trans-Asia further clarified that the 286 days divisor already takes into account the ten (10) regular
holidays in a year since it only subtracts from the 365 calendar days the unworked and unpaid 52 Sundays
and 26 Saturdays (employees are required to work half-day during Saturdays). Trans-Asia claimed that if
the ten (10) regular holidays were not included in the computation of their employees monthly salary,
the divisor which they would have used would only be 277 days which is arrived at by subtracting 52
Sundays, 26 Saturdays and the 10 legal holidays from 365 calendar days.
Labor Arbiter and NLRC: Dismissed the complaint for lack of merit.
Held:
No, it is not in such a way that the Supreme Court adjusted the divisor.
Trans-Asias inclusion of holiday pay in petitioners monthly salary is clearly established by its consistent
use of the divisor of 286 days in the computation of its employees benefits and deductions. The use by
Trans-Asia of the 286 days divisor was never disputed by petitioners. A simple application of
mathematics would reveal that the ten (10) legal holidays in a year are already accounted for with the use
of the said divisor. As explained by Trans-Asia, if one is to deduct the unworked 52 Sundays and 26
Saturdays (derived by dividing 52 Saturdays in half since petitioners are required to work half-day on
Saturdays) from the 365 calendar days in a year, the resulting divisor would be 286 days (should actually
be 287 days). Since the ten (10) legal holidays were never included in subtracting the unworked and
unpaid days in a calendar year, the only logical conclusion would be that the payment for holiday pay is
already incorporated into the said divisor.
However, SC held that that there is a need to adjust the divisor used by Trans-Asia to 287 days, instead of
only 286 days, in order to properly account for the entirety of regular holidays and special days in a year
as prescribed by Executive Order No. 203 in relation to Section 6 of the Rules Implementing Republic Act
6727.
Sec. 1. Unless otherwise modified by law, order or proclamation, the following regular holidays and special
days shall be observed in the country:
A. Regular Holidays
On the other hand, Section 6 of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 6727
provides:
Sec. 6. Suggested Formula in Determining the Equivalent Monthly Statutory Minimum Wage Rates.
Without prejudice from existing company practices, agreements or policies, the following formulas may
be used as guides in determining the equivalent monthly statutory minimum wage rates:
d) For those who do not work and are not considered paid on Saturdays and Sundays or rest days:
2 days Special days (If considered paid; if actually worked, this is equivalent to 2.6
Based on the above, the proper divisor that should be used for a situation wherein the employees do
not work and are not considered paid on Saturdays and Sundays or rest days is 262 days. In the present
case, since the employees of Trans-Asia are required to work half-day on Saturdays, 26 days should be
added to the divisor of 262 days, thus, resulting to 288 days. However, due to the fact that the rest days
of petitioners fall on a Sunday, the number of unworked but paid legal holidays should be reduced to nine
(9), instead of ten (10), since one legal holiday under E.O. No. 203 always falls on the last Sunday of August,
National Heroes Day. Thus, the divisor that should be used in the present case should be 287 days.
However, the Court notes that if the divisor is increased to 287 days, the resulting daily rate for purposes
of overtime pay, holiday pay and conversions of accumulated leaves would be diminished. To illustrate, if
an employee receives P8,000.00 as his monthly salary, his daily rate would be P334.49, computed as
follows:
Whereas if the divisor used is only 286 days, the employees daily rate would be P335.66, computed as
follows:
Clearly, this muddled situation would be violative of the proscription on the non-diminution of benefits
under Section 100 of the Labor Code. On the other hand, the use of the divisor of 287 days would be to
the advantage of petitioners if it is used for purposes of computing for deductions due to the employees
absences. In view of this situation, the Court rules that the adjusted divisor of 287 days should only be
used by Trans-Asia for computations which would be advantageous to petitioners (i.e., deductions for
absences), and not for computations which would diminish the existing benefits of the employees (i.e.,
overtime pay, holiday pay and leave conversions.)
SC Decision:
WHEREFORE, the Resolutions of the NLRC, dated 23 November 1993 and 13 September 1994, are hereby
AFFIRMED with the MODIFICATION that Trans-Asia is hereby ordered to adjust its divisor to 287 days and
pay the resulting holiday pay in arrears brought about by this adjustment starting from 30 June 1987, the
date of effectivity of E.O. No. 203.