Konveksi 03 OK
Konveksi 03 OK
Konveksi 03 OK
Material and Methods due to natural convection. Solution initialization was done at
303 K for all zones. Oil domain was patched to a temperature of
Experimental Set up and Measurement Techniques: The
423 K.
experimental setup has been shown in figure 1. Figure 2 shows
the experimental cylinder along with thermocouple position in
the cylinder and in the fin surface. The cylinder was made up of
cast iron and has a fitted cap. The volume of the hollow portion
of the experimental cylinder is 300 cm3. Fin was made of an
aluminum alloy (JIS A6010). The fins were fitted tightly in the
cylinder. Heat storage liquid (SAE 40 oil) of 300 cm3 was used
to fill the cylinder in order to maintain uniform temperature in
the cylinder. An induction heater with electrical power of 400
W was used to heat the oil to 150C. J type thermocouples were
inserted into the cylinder and fin to measure the temperature.
The heat storage liquid was heated and is poured into the
cylinder and the cap is placed above the cylinder. The Figure-1
temperature of the heat storage liquid was decreased by cooling Experimental cylinder with fins
at room temperature. The heat release from the cylinder was
obtained by multiplying the heat capacity of the heat storage
5
liquid by the difference between 150C and the temperature
after every 10 seconds at zero air velocity. The experiments 4
were carried out at an ambient temperature of 33C.
Thus the numerical result by CFD analysis is calculated and the shows the plot of heat release from the oil which is calculated
temperature of the fin for the first 100 seconds is plotted along after every 10 seconds. From the plot it can be inferred that the
with the experimental readings. Figure 4 shows the temperature experimental and numerical results show the same variation
at fin surface of numerical and experimental analysis, which is with deviation being less than +4%.
measured at a distance of 25 mm from cylinder surface. Figure 5
Figure-3
Meshed model of Cylinder, Oil domain and Fin
60
50
Temperature( C)
40
30 Numerical result
20 Experimental result
10
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Time (s)
Figure-4
Time vs. Temperature plot for Numerical and Experimental Results
250
200
Heat release (W)
150
Heat release from numerical
100 study
50 Heat release from experimental
study
0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Time (s)
Figure-5
Heat Released vs. Time plot for Numerical & Experimental Study
Results and Discussion been shown in figure 10. Different fin pitches are compared on
the basis of net heat dissipated at fin tip by all the fins in model.
Effect of Fin Material: To analyze the effect of material The surface heat transfer coefficient is multiplied by the area of
properties, copper, aluminum and cast iron were considered for one fin and number of fins in every fin geometry. The maximum
the best heat dissipation considering both the conduction and value of heat transfer is obtained for pitch of 10 mm. Figure 11
convection heat transfer parameters. Three numerical models shows the contour of heat transfer through 10 mm fin pitch
with different fin materials (copper, aluminum and cast iron) geometry at a velocity of 60 kmph.
and same cylinder material (cast iron) were simulated under
same operating conditions i.e. constant temperature of cylinder Effect of Velocity of Air: To examine whether the performance
inner wall at 150oC and wind velocity of 60 Km/hr. Figure 6
of different fin pitches varies with wind velocity, simulation are
shows the temperature profile on the copper fin surface. The
temperature contours for cast iron fin is shown in figure 7. As carried out for all the different pin pitches for different air
inferred from the figure the temperature is more distributed on velocity. Meshed model for air domain and fins were created
the copper fin, showing greater area of heat transfer. and shown in figure 12. The numerical analysis is carried out for
different velocities from 20 to 80 kmph. The velocity is given in
Figure 8 shows the variation of coefficient of heat transfer with positive x direction. Apart from inlet and pressure outlet all
change in fin material at fin tip. Under steady-state conditions, surfaces of air domain are specified as wall condition. Figure 13
copper fin has the maximum surface heat transfer coefficient at
shows the contour of heat transfer through 10 mm pitch
fin tip. Aluminum fin is marginally below the copper fin in
terms of surface heat transfer co-efficient and cast iron fin has geometry at a velocity of 20 kmph. The temperature contour of
the lowest value of co-efficient. same geometry at 80 kmph is shown in figure 14. The thermal
boundary layer can be easily observed between fins in the
Effect of Fin Pitch: Three different fin pitches of 7 mm, 10 mm figures. The region between the fins is hotter for 20 kmph in
and 14 mm have been analyzed for internal combustion engine comparison to 80 kmph, showing less heat transfer at lower
cylinder with 80 mm length. The pitches have been measured
wind velocity.
from fin surfaces. The number of fin varies with respect to the
change in the fin pitch. The number of fins is 6 for a fin pitch of
7 mm and it is 5 for a fin pitch of 10 mm. The heat transfer coefficient of different fin array is plotted
against variable air velocity in figure 15. The results show that
Figure 9 show the meshed model of 6 fins having a spacing of 7 the performance of fin model increases with wind velocity but
mm. The different fin pitch models were simulated at four the gradient decreases as wind velocity increases from 60 to 80
different air velocities (20, 40, 60 and 80 Kmph). Results have kmh.
Figure-6
Temperature Contour plot of Copper fins
Figure-7
Temperature Contour plot of cast iron fins
Figure-8
Meshed model of 6 fins with 7mm pitch
Figure-9
Boundary Layer plot of 5 fins with 10mm pitch at 60Kmph
Figure-10
Meshed model with Air Domain, Cylinder & Fins
Figure-11
Boundary Layer plot of 5 fins at 10mm pitch at 20 Kmph
Figure-12
Boundary Layer plot of 5 fins at 10mm pitch at 80 Kmph
78
Surface heat transfer co- 76
efficient at fin tip
74
(W/m^2*K)
72
70
68
66
64
Aluminium Copper Cast Iron
Figure-13
Plot of Heat Transfer for different materials
0.7
Surface heat transfer coefficient
0.6
at fin tip for all fins (W/K)
0.5
0.4
Pitch-7mm
0.3
0.2 Pitch-10mm
0.1 Pitch-14mm
0
20 40 60 80
Velocity (Km/hr)
Figure-14
Plot of Heat dissipated at fin tip vs. Velocity for different fin pitches
0.7
Surface heat transfer coefficient
0.6
at fin tip for all fins (W/K)
0.5
0.4 Velocity - 20 Kmh
0
5 7 9 11 13 15
Fin Pitch (mm)
Figure-15
Heat dissipated by fins at tip at different velocities