FYSH551: - From Classical World To QM and QFT
FYSH551: - From Classical World To QM and QFT
FYSH551: - From Classical World To QM and QFT
Lecture notes
Jan Rak
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 1 / 22
Lecture Goal
Get you familiar with URHI physics and method frequently used the the field and
prepare potentially interested candidates for an easy integration into the
international collaboration/community.
Give you more ideas about what the formulas are telling you. Many learn just
formulas and how to use them but the message is often lost-in-the-translation
Help you to think critically about your (and not only yours) research.
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 2 / 22
Examples of Critical Reading
Where Physics Went Wrong By: Bernard Lavenda (University of Camerino, Italy)
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 3 / 22
Examples of Critical Reading
Where Physics Went Wrong By: Bernard Lavenda (University of Camerino, Italy)
The book points out what has gone wrong with physics since Einsteins formulation of
this theory of general relativity a century ago. It points out inconsistencies and fallacies
in the standard model of the big bang and the inflationary scenario which was
supposed to have overcome those shortcomings, the evolution of string theory from a
theory of the strong interaction to a theory of gravitation and quantum mechanics which
has not produced a single verifiable prediction, and what it has accomplished is
reaffirming wrong results like the entropy of a black hole, which is not an entropy at all.
There have even been attempts to demote gravity to an emergent phenomenon with
catastrophic effects. We know exactly what happened at 1034 seconds after the big
bang, but do not know how fast gravity propagates, whether gravitational waves exist,
and what are the limits of Newtons law. Attempts to rectify this are the prediction of
dark energy/matter, which has never been observed nor ever will, and MOND. The
latter is really not a modification of Newtonian mechanics, but a transformation of a
dynamical law into a statistical one.
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 4 / 22
Examples of Critical Reading
X
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 5 / 22
Examples of Critical Reading
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 6 / 22
CERN press release February 2000
c c
Color Screening
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 7 / 22
Lectures from Ancient History Epicycle
In the Hipparchian and Ptolemaic systems of astronomy, the epicycle (literally: on the
circle in Greek) was a geometric model used to explain the variations in speed and
direction of the apparent motion of the Moon, Sun, and planets. In particular it
explained the apparent retrograde motion of the five planets known at the time.
Secondarily, it also explained changes in the apparent distances of the planets from
Earth.
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 8 / 22
Lectures from Ancient History Epicycle
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 9 / 22
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 10 / 22
Yet some other questions to think about
Where is the force coming from? And where is the force in QM and QFT coming
from?
Where is the attractive force coming from?
Why the two point-like objects (quark) could ever scatter?
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 11 / 22
Yet some other questions to think about
Where is the force coming from? And where is the force in QM and QFT coming
from?
Where is the attractive force coming from?
Why the two point-like objects (quark) could ever scatter?
Newton Law / equation of motion: F = mx explains HOW but doesnt say anything
about WHY.
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 11 / 22
Why?
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 12 / 22
Quantum vs Classical Meachanics
Newtonian Lagrangian Hamiltonian
The equations of motion of classical mechanics are embodied in a variational principle,
called Hamiltons principle = the motion is such that it extremis the action functional
Z t2
S[q(t)] = dt L(q, q, t)
t1
L=T U vs H =T +U
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 13 / 22
Quantum vs Classical Meachanics
Newtonian Lagrangian Hamiltonian
The equations of motion of classical mechanics are embodied in a variational principle,
called Hamiltons principle = the motion is such that it extremis the action functional
Z t2
S[q(t)] = dt L(q, q, t)
t1
L=T U vs H =T +U
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 14 / 22
Configuration vs Phase space
to
consider 2n-dim Phse space
2n independent variables qi in n-dim space.
(gi , qi , t) (qi , pi , t)
Trajectory could cross. More natural is
Trajectory never crosses.
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 15 / 22
Legendre Transformation
f f
dg = d(ux) df = udx + xdu x dx y dy
f
u(x, y ) = x
then dg becomes
f
dg = xdu y dy
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 16 / 22
Legendre Transformation
To be explicit:
H H
pi = q i
qi = pi L
dt =
H
dt
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 17 / 22
Determinism, Independence, and Objectivity are Incompatible
Hidden-variable models aim to reproduce the results of quantum theory and to satisfy
our classical intuition. Their refutation is usually based on deriving predictions that are
different from those of quantum mechanics. Here instead we study the mutual
compatibility of apparently reasonable classical assumptions. We analyze a version of
the delayed-choice experiment which ostensibly combines determinism, independence
of hidden variables on the conducted experiments, and wave-particle objectivity (the
assertion that quantum systems are, at any moment, either particles or waves, but not
both). These three ideas are incompatible with any theory, not only with quantum
mechanics.
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 18 / 22
Think Quantum Mechanically
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 19 / 22
Quantum Mechanics
~ 2
Replace class. EM by i~ t (r , t) = 2m + V (r , t) (r , t)
2
5
Re Re
4
3
(x)
x x
2
1 Img Img
0
0 5 10 15 20 i i
x (x) = e (x) (x) e (x)
Exercise session - calculate the interference pattern for particle passing
through a single/double slit.
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 20 / 22
My/Quantum Physics billion dollars questions
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 21 / 22
Ultra-relativistic Heavy Ion Physics
Jan Rak
Jan Rak (Jyvskyl University, HIP, Finland) FYSH551 - From Classical world to QM and QFT March 11, 2015 22 / 22