Answers To Review Quizzes & Problems - CH 05 PDF
Answers To Review Quizzes & Problems - CH 05 PDF
Answers To Review Quizzes & Problems - CH 05 PDF
5 EFFICIENCY AND
EQUITY
Force: Generally works well when used to uphold the rule of law. An example is the state
imprisoning thieves.
4. Provide an example of each allocation method that illustrates when it works badly.
Below are examples of when each allocation scheme would work poorly:
Market price: Deciding court cases on the basis of who will pay the most for the decision.
Command: Running an economy.
Majority rule: Deciding how many acres of wheat to plant.
Contest: Allocating food in a winner-take-all contest.
First-come, first-served: Admitting students to college based on who applied first.
Lottery: Assigning grades based on random chance.
Personal characteristics: Renting only to married couples.
Force: Stealing by threat of physical harm.
Page 111
1. How do we measure the value or marginal benefit of a good or service?
The value, or marginal benefit, of a good or service is measured by the maximum amount that
consumers are willing to pay for one more unit of a good or service.
2. What is consumer surplus? How is it measured?
Consumer surplus is the value or marginal benefit of a good minus the price paid, summed over the
quantity of the good purchased. The price per unit of a good is assumed to be equal for all units of the
good purchased. The quantity purchased is determined by equating the marginal benefit to the price
paid. This means that the consumer surplus can be measured as the area under the demand curve and
above the price paid, summed over the entire quantity purchased.
Page 113
1. What is the relationship between the marginal cost, minimum supply-price, and supply?
The minimum supply-price of producing one more unit of a good or service is its marginal cost, and the
marginal cost is the minimum price that producers must receive to induce them to offer one more unit
of a good or service for sale.
2. What is producer surplus? How is it measured?
Producer surplus is the price received for each unit of a good minus the cost of producing it, summed over
all units produced. The price per unit of a good is assumed to be the same for all units of the good sold.
The quantity purchased is that quantity where the marginal cost is equal to the price received. This
means that the producer surplus can be measured as the area under the price and above the supply curve,
summed over the entire quantity sold.
Page 117
1. Do competitive markets use resources efficiently? Explain why or why not.
In the absence of the obstacles mentioned earlier in the chapter, competitive markets use societys
resources efficiently. For resources to be used efficiently they must be allocated to produce the quantity
of a good or service where the marginal cost of the last unit produced in the market is equal to the
marginal benefit. This condition will be met in a competitive market because equilibrium quantity
occurs where the demand curve (which equals the marginal social benefit curve) intersects the supply
curve (which equals the marginal social cost curve).
Page 121
1. What are the two big approaches to thinking about fairness?
The two big approaches to thinking about fairness are:
Its not fair if the result isnt fair, or utilitarianism.
Its not fair if the rules arent fair, or equality of opportunity.
2. What is the utilitarian idea of fairness and what is wrong with it?
The utilitarian idea of fairness implies that equality of incomes is necessary for the allocation of resources
to be fair. There should be income transfers from the rich to the poor until equality is achieved,
because the marginal benefit of the last dollar of income is the same for everybody. There are two
problem with utilitarianism:
It ignores the cost of implementing the income transfers, which will decrease the total goods and
services that the finite resources of society can produce. The size of the economic pie will be smaller.
It assumes that the existence of decreasing marginal benefits allows us to make inter-personal
comparisons about value gained and lost at different levels of consumption of a good or service.
While one can compare the marginal benefits from consuming different levels of a good or service
for an individual, this is not the same as comparing the marginal benefits from consuming different
levels of a good or service across individuals.
3. Explain the big tradeoff. What idea of fairness has been developed to deal with it?
The big tradeoff is the tradeoff between equality and efficiency. Redistributing incomes changes the
incentives facing producers and consumers. Taxing income decreases producer surplus and taxing
purchases decreases consumer surplus. Producers produce less and consumers consume less, and total
economic activity declines, such that the size of the economic pie decreases. The big tradeoff has led to
the idea that the fairest distribution is that which makes the poorest person as well off as possible.
4. What is the idea of fairness based on fair rules?
The fair rules idea of fairness is that of providing equality of opportunity is necessary for the allocation of
resources to be fair. This is the economic application of the symmetry principle, that people in similar
situations be treated similarly. Equality of opportunity can be achieved if two rules are obeyed:
The government must enforce laws that establish and protect rights to private property that are held
by individuals in society, and
Private property may be transferred from one person to another only by voluntary exchange and
without fraudulent representation.
1. At West, recognized as the jewel of Vancouvers culinary crown, reservations are essential.
At Le Bistro Chez Michel, a restaurant in North Vancouver, reservations are recommended.
At Vijis, a restaurant not far from the University of British Columbia, reservations are not
accepted.
a. Describe the method of allocating scarce table resources at these three restaurants.
All these restaurants use a first-come, first-serve system. Vijis uses this system directly. West uses a first-
come, first-serve because the first person to call to make a reservation at a particular time is allocated the
table at that time. Le Bistro Chez Michel uses a combination of the immediate first-come, first serve
system and the reservation based first-come, first-serve system.
b. Why do you think restaurants have different reservations policies?
The speed with which tables turn over at the different restaurants probably is quite different and the
customers probably have quite different values of time. West has a low turnover rateonly 1 or 2
groups of customers can use a table each nightand its customers have a high value of time. If West
refused to take reservations, its customers would need to wait an inefficiently long time and would go
elsewhere, so Wests profits would fall. At Vijis, the tables have a high turnover rate and the customers
have a lower value of time. Allowing reservations would be costly for Vijis and would spare its
customers only a slight wait at most, so allowing reservations would decrease Vijis profits. At Le Bistro
Chez Michel, the turnover rate of the tables is between that at West and Vijis, so it uses a combination
of phone reservation first-come, first-serve and appear in person first-come, first serve.
c. Why might each restaurant be using an efficient allocation method?
Each restaurant is using a different allocation method because of the relative costs. Each uses the method
that has the lowest cost for the restaurant.
d. Why do you think restaurants dont use the market price to allocate their tables?
Market allocation requires that customers pay for a table and the price would fluctuate from one hour to
the next depending on the number of customers who arrive. Customers would be highly uncertain about
the price they would need to pay and such uncertainty decreases the demand for meals from the
restaurant. The decreased demand lowers the restaurants profit.
2. The table provides
information on the demand Price Quantity demanded
schedules for train travel for (dollars per (kilometre)
Ann, Beth, and Cy, who are kilometre) Ann Beth Cy
the only buyers in the 3 30 25 20
market. 4 25 20 15
5 20 15 10
6 15 10 5
7 10 5 0
8 5 0 0
9 0 0 0
b. What are the maximum prices that Ann, Beth, and Cy are willing to pay to travel 20
kilometres? Why?
Each persons demand schedule shows the maximum price that person is willing to pay to travel 20
kilometres. The maximum price Ann is willing to pay to travel 20 kilometres is $5, the maximum price
Beth is willing to pay is $4, and the maximum price Cy is willing to pay is $3.
c. What is the marginal social benefit when the total distance travelled is 60 kilometres?
The marginal social benefit when the quantity is 60 kilometre is $4 per mile. The marginal social benefit
is determined from the consumers demands and equals the maximum price that consumers will pay for
the quantity. The demand schedule shows that the maximum price consumers will pay for 60 kilometres
is $4 per kilometre and this price equals the marginal social benefit.
d. What is the marginal benefit for each person when they travel a total distance of 60
kilometres and how many kilometres does each of the people travel?
The three travel a total distance of 60 kilometres when the price is $4 a kilometre. Each persons
marginal benefit is $4 per kilometre. At this price Ann travels 25 kilometres, Beth travels 20 kilometres,
and Cy travels 15 kilometres.
e. What is each travelers consumer surplus when the price is $4 a mile?
Anns consumer surplus is $62.50; Beths consumer surplus is $40.00; and, Cys consumer surplus is
$22.50.
When the price is $4 per kilometre, Ann travels 25 kilometres. Anns consumer surplus is the triangular
area under her demand curve and above the price. The demand curve is linear, so Anns consumer
surplus is 1/2 ($9 $4) 25, which equals $62.50.
When the price is $4 per kilometre, Beth travels 20 kilometres. Beths consumer surplus is the triangular
area under her demand curve and above the price. The demand curve is linear, so Beths consumer
surplus is 1/2 ($8 $4) 20, which equals $40.00
When the price is $4 per kilometre, Cy travels 15 kilometres. Cys consumer surplus is the triangular
area under his demand curve and above the price. The demand curve is linear, so Cys consumer surplus
is 1/2 ($7 $4) 15, which equals $22.50.
f. What is the market consumer surplus when the price is $4 a kilometre?
The market consumer surplus is the sum of Anns consumer surplus, Beths consumer surplus, and Cys
consumer surplus, or $125.00.
b. What are the minimum prices that Xavier, Yasmin, and Zack are willing to accept to
supply 20 rides? Why?
The minimum supply-price equals the lowest price at which a producer is willing to produce the given
quantity. The supply schedule tells us the minimum supply-price. Xaviers minimum supply-price for 20
rides is $80; Yasmins minimum supply-price is $90; and, Zacks minimum supply-price is $100.
c. What is the marginal social cost when the total number of rides is 30?
The quantity of rides is supplied is 30 when the price is $70 per ride. The marginal social cost of any
quantity is equal to the price for which that quantity will be supplied, so when the total number of rides
is 30, the marginal social cost equals $70 per ride.
d. What is the marginal cost for each supplier when the total number of rides is 30 and how
many rides does each of the firms supply?
When the total number of rides is 30, Xavier supplies 15 rides, Yasmin supplies 10 rides, and Zack
supplies 5 rides. The marginal cost for each firm is $70.
e. What is each firms producer surplus when the price is $70 a ride?
Xaviers producer surplus is $225; Yasmins producer surplus is $100; and, Zacks producer surplus is
$25.
When the price is $70 per ride, Xavier supplies 15 rides. Xaviers producer surplus is the triangular area
under the price and above his supply curve. The supply curve is linear, so Xaviers producer surplus is
1/2 ($70 $40) 15, which equals $225.
When the price is $70 per ride, Yasmin supplies 10 rides. Yasmins producer surplus is the triangular
area under the price and above his supply curve. The supply curve is linear, so Yasmins producer surplus
is 1/2 ($70 $50) 10, which equals $100.
When the price is $70 per ride, Zack supplies 5 rides. Zacks producer surplus is the triangular area
under the price and above his supply curve. The supply curve is linear, so Zacks producer surplus is 1/2
($70 $60) 5, which equals $25.
f. What is the market producer surplus when the price is $70 a ride?
The market producer surplus is equal to the sum of Xaviers producer surplus plus Yasmins producer
surplus plus Zacks producer surplus, which is $225 + $100 + $25 or $350.
5. Based on the information provided in the news clip in problem 3,
a. Can an eBay auction give the seller a surplus?
Yes, an eBay auction can give a seller a surplus. The seller has a minimum supply price for which the
item will be sold. If the price established in the auction exceeds that minimum supply price, the seller
has a surplus.
b. Draw a graph to illustrate an eBay auction
and show the consumer surplus and
producer surplus that it generates.
Figure 5.1 illustrates an eBay auction. The figure
assumes that there are many suppliers of this
good, each with a different minimum supply price
so that the supply curve is upward sloping. The
consumer surplus is area A, the area under the
demand curve and above the (auction-
determined) market price. The producer surplus is
area B, the area under the market price and above
the supply curve.
c. Can you think of reasons why Nintendo might want to underproduce and leave the market
with fewer Wii than people want to buy?
Nintendo might have wanted to create a shortage to gain more publicity for its Wii. If news reporters
had story after story about the shortage, then Nintendo would gain free publicity. Additionally, given
the very high initial demand for a Wii, if the price was set so that the quantity supplied equaled the
initial (very high) quantity demanded, then the price would be high. After the initial adopters were
satisfied, the price would then fall and Nintendo would get a reputation for price gouging.
d. What are the two methods of resource allocation described in the news clip?
The first store was using a first-come, first serve method of allocation. The second, smaller stores were
allocating Wii using a lottery so that winners would obtain a Wii.
e. Is either method of allocating Wii efficient?
Neither method is likely efficient. But given that the price was not going to charge to allocate the Wii,
some other method or methods had to be used to allocate the Wii.
f. What do you think some of the people who managed to buy a Wii did with it?
Some of the people who acquired a Wii resold it to other people.
g. Explain which is the fairer method of allocating the Wii: the market price or the two
methods described in the news clip.
Allocating Wii according to the market price is not necessarily fair using the fair results approach but
is fair using the fair rules approach. The other two methods of allocation are fair according to either of
fairness measures only by random chance.
9. New Zealands Private Forests
In the late 1980s, New Zealand decided it was time to quit cold turkey. Its addiction was
government. By the early 1990s, New Zealand had [sold] half of the countrys total
plantation forests to the highest bidder, introducing an era of privately-owned forests. We
want [timber companies] to behave like farmers. Farmers make sure they dont destroy the
soil or run down its fertility. Farmers look after their farms to make them continuously
productive. The argument right from the start was [i]ts a commercial decision. These
are supposedly commercial forests planted to make a profit.
Reuters, September 7, 2007
a. In the late 1980s, was the New Zealand timber industry efficient? Did logging companies
operate in the social interest or self-interest?
In the late 1980s, the logging companies were operating in their self-interest. They were producing
more than the efficient quantity. Marginal cost exceeded marginal benefit. The logging companies were
not considering all of the costs of production because they did not own the land on which they were
working. They had no incentive to preserve forestland or to cut timber in a way that would make
future harvesting of trees profitable.
b. Since the early 1990s, has the New Zealand timber industry been efficient? Have logging
companies operated in the social interest or self-interest?
Since the early 1990s, the logging companies have been operating in the self-interest and the social
interest. They are producing the efficient quantity. Marginal social cost equals marginal social benefit
because the private forest owners charge the logging companies for the use of the land.
The logging companies now must consider all of the costs of producing.
c. What incentive do private timber companies have to ensure that they operate like
farmers?
The incentive that private companies have to ensure that they "operate like farmers" is profit.
If loggers deplete the forests this year, they will have no profit in the years to come. The private timber
company has the incentive to maximize its profit over the long term. This incentive means that the
timber company will preserve the efficient quantity of young trees and allow them to grow to maturity,
and will plant new trees to have trees to harvest in the future.
c. If agricultural users pay a higher price for water, what will happen to consumer surplus
and producer surplus from water?
If the price paid by agricultural users rises, the consumer surplus of agricultural users decreases and the
producer surplus increases.
d. Is the difference in price paid by agricultural and residential users fair?
According to the fair results approach, the difference in price is fair only if agricultural users are poorer
than residential users. If, however, agricultural users are wealthier than or comparable to residential
users, the difference in price is not fair. The difference in price is not fair according to the fair rules
approach because the price of water is not determined in competitive markets.
15. After you have studied Reading Between the Lines on pp. 122123, answer the following
questions:
a. What is the major problem in achieving an efficient use of the worlds water?
Water needs to be transported from where it is available to where it is needed. This basic issue leads to
two major problems: Overproduction in some areas and underproduction in other areas. Often
overproduction in an area leads to underproduction later in the same area. In particular, markets in
water are not competitive. In many areas, water is free to whomever digs a deep enough well. As a
result, too many people dig wells and water is overproduced. If the overproduction is bad enough, the
level of groundwater can be reduced so far that it becomes literally impossible to extract any water. Then
water needs to be transported to the now arid area. In this case, often the government transports the
water and sells it at a very low price or gives it away. But because the government does not sell the water
at an equilibrium price (and because the government is not motivated by seeking profit) less water is
transported than the efficient quantity.
b. If there were a global market in water, like there is in oil, how do you think the market
would work?
The market for water would be more efficient than the current situation. Areas with a great deal of
water, say Canada, could export water to areas with less water, say Mexico. If water was purchased and
sold in markets, there would be greater incentive to build desalination plants where they are practical as
well as greater incentive to conserve water where it is in abundance.
c. Would a free world market in water achieve an efficient use of the worlds water resources?
Explain why or why not.
A free world market in water likely would (eventually) bring an efficient use of resources as the necessary
infrastructure was constructed. Of the factors that can lead to inefficiency (government price and
quantity regulations, monopoly power, and so forth) the only issue that could possibly lead to
inefficiency is the point that water is a common resource in some situations.
d. Would a free world market in water achieve a fair use of the worlds water resources?
Explain why or why not and be clear about the concept of fairness that you are using.
A fair results approach to fairness would argue that in third world countries, very poor inhabitants (for
example, nomads) would not be able to afford enough water and so some redistribution is needed for
the sake of fairness. A fair rules approach to fairness asserts that a competitive market is enough to
insure fairness.
17. Use the link on MyEconLab (Chapter Resources, Chapter 5, Web links) to visit the Web site
of Health Action International and read the article by Catrin Schulte-Hillen entitled Study
concerning the availability and price of AZT. Then answer the following questions and
explain your answers using the concepts of marginal benefit, marginal cost, price, consumer
surplus, and producer surplus.
a. What is the range of retail prices of AZT across the countries covered by the study?
The retail (pharmacy) prices range from $0.67 in Thailand to $2.80 in Germany.
b. What, if anything, do you think could be done to increase the quantity of AZT and decrease
its price?
The article states that The major determining factor is the existence of alternative products on the
market, i.e. competition. So one factor that will lead to lower prices and increased quantities is either
disregard the patent or wait until the patent expires. In either case, the increased competition will lead to
lower prices and increased quantities. If the government does not want to disregard the patent, it could
try to negotiate lower prices by perhaps arranging purchases of larger quantities. Or the government
could simply lower the allowable legal price for AZT in the nation. The drawback with this last policy is
that it might lead to a decrease in the quantity of AZT available.
c. Canadian online pharmacies sell AZT to Americans for a price below the U.S. price. Does
this practice increase or decrease consumer surplus, producer surplus, and deadweight loss
from AZT in the United States?
The practice of Canadian on-line pharmacies selling AZT in the United States at a price below the U.S.
price increases consumer surplus in the United States. U.S. producers sell AZT to Canadian pharmacies,
but at a lower price than they can sell the drug in the United States. To the extent that the Canadian
sales replace sales of U.S.-sold products, producer surplus in the Untied States decreases. However, to
the extent that the product is manufactured in the United States and to the extent that these sales are
new, that is, would not have been made except for the lower price, the sales increase U.S. producer
surplus. Producer surplus in Canada increases.