Greece and Southeastern Europe Economic & Financial Outlook: Executive Summary
Greece and Southeastern Europe Economic & Financial Outlook: Executive Summary
Greece and Southeastern Europe Economic & Financial Outlook: Executive Summary
Following the election of the new government in October At the same time, pressures have been intensified for
2009, the deterioration in public finances assumed a new Greece to implement swiftly its HSPG and to come
dimension with the announcement that the deficit was not forward with additional measures, if need be, to
of the order of 8.5% of GDP, as most analysts were safeguard the achievement of its fiscal consolidation
predicting at the time, but rather 12.7% of GDP. This was targets for 2010, 2011 and 2013. The ECOFIN in
the result of the new governments marking to market all February 16, 2010, acting under Article 126 (9), has
obligations arising from the past and likely to burden imposed a deadline of March 16, 2010 for Greece
future budgets so as to clear the kitchen sink and start presenting a timetable for implementing budgetary target
measures for 2010, and another by 15 May, 2010
Contents outlining the policy measures needed to bring the deficit
1. Greece .......................................................................... 1 to below 3% of GDP by 2012, while quarterly reports be
2. Romania...................................................................... 12 submitted thereafter regarding progress on
3. Bulgaria ....................................................................... 14
implementation. Despite all of the above, currently, the
4. Cyprus......................................................................... 15
5. Serbia.......................................................................... 16 10-year Greek government bond spread over German
6. Albania ........................................................................ 18 bonds still stands at about 317 basis points, having come
7. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.................... 19 down from its peak lever of around 400 basis points at
8. Ukraine........................................................................ 20 end-January 2010.
9. Turkey ......................................................................... 21
10. Economic Data Greece .......................................... 23 The low credibility of economic policy making in Greece is
11. Economic Data Southeastern Europe .................... 24 the key stumbling block in convincing the markets and all
other parties involved about the adequacy of the HSPG.
The result is ever increasing demands for additional may prevent recovery of their economies from the deep
measures, concrete implementation timetables and recession of 2009, or it may throw these economies into
detailed specification of all major structural reforms an even deeper recession.
included in the HSPG. The loss of credibility is so severe
that people make judgements without even considering Dia gra m 1. Com pa ra tive e volution of ge ne ta l gove rnme nt
deficit in Gre ec e a nd se le cte d countrie s.
the concerted effort now underway to tackle the key
drivers of deficit generation in Greece, i.e. the rapid
employment and wage growth in the public sector -2,8
including the government, the state-controlled entities and
local authorities, the worsening tax evasion situation and, -5,6
300
Greece, on the other hand, will be in a better position to
250 bring its general government deficit down, even below
200 the 2.8% of GDP by 2012, because its deficit is mainly
150 due to the overexpansion and extensive mismanagement
100
of the public sector itself, especially in the last two years.
What is needed is better governance and management of
50
public finances, the reversal of the excesses of the 2000s
0
Jan 2009 Jul 2009 Jan 2010
in increasing public sector employment and wages, the
gradual withdrawal of the Greek state from activities that
Greece is in a much better position to proceed with are better performed by the private sector, the
fiscal adjustment than markets currently assume. rationalization of management of public sector
Greece is not the only country facing excessive fiscal organizations and businesses with a substantial increase
imbalances in the last two years, as is shown in Diagram of cost recovery in these entities and, finally, the long
3, which is based on OECD estimates and projections overdue reform of the overgenerous Greek social security
and the projections of the HSGP. In fact, if we assume system, which is the main source of Greeces fiscal
that Greece will come near to achieve the targets of the problems. More specifically:
HSGP in 2011 and 2012, then Greece will have one of Both public sector employment and wages can be
the lowest fiscal deficits in the OECD area in this period. contained in the following years, in combination with a
Moreover, while Greece has indeed a higher debt/GDP substantial increase in productivity in this sector. Related
ratio (expected to reach 120% of GDP in 2011), measures adopted in the HSGP are:
comparing with the other countries presented in Diagram
3, it is not clear whether it will continue to be the leader in a) A reduction in civil service employment with the freeze
that area in the following years. According to HSGP the in public sector hiring in 2010 and a rule for hiring only
Greek debt/GDP ratio will be set on a falling trend from one new employee for every five that will retire in the
2012 onwards and it will reach 113.5% in 2013. On the following years.
other hand, in the following years and for the whole b) The rationalization, merging, or abolition of numerous
decade of 2010 in most of the other indebted countries public sector organizations and entities and the closing
the debt/GDP ratio is set to increase and to exceed 100% down of tourism promotion offices abroad.
of GDP in a few years from now.
c) Moreover, with the new reorganization scheme of local
Moreover, Greece shares with other OECD countries government organizations (of which the relevant
(Japan, USA, UK, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, and others) legislative bill has already been published), the number of
the prospect of a substantial fiscal consolidation in the municipalities in the country are set to be reduced to 370
from 1.060 currently.
2010s: For those countries, however, the recent
ballooning of their fiscal imbalances was not due to the d) An absolute freezing of basic salaries in the public
mismanagement of their public sectors, but mainly the sector, while at the same time reducing income
result of their effort to accommodate the huge negative allowances by 10% (resulting in 1% - 5.5% total income
effects of the international economic crisis in their cuts). Moreover, overtime work (which currently
economies and in particular in their financial system. constitutes a big part of public sector wage payments) will
be reduced by 30% and the same will apply for
Therefore, in these countries fiscal consolidation is risky
compensation for travel and out-of-office work. Finally all
because a premature withdrawal of fiscal stimulus in them currently untaxed or partially taxed income allowances
The above policies are expected to imply a negative Moreover, has already announced its legislative
growth (-1.0%) of the central government wages and initiatives for the long overdue fundamental reform of
pensions bill in 2010, compared with a 2.8% increase of Greeces unsustainable pension system, the main target
this bill assumed in the budget of 2010 and an increase of of which is: a) to effectively contain the rate of increase of
11.5% in 2009. the transfers from the budget to the various pension funds
of the country, and b) to make pension funds benefits
For the years after 2010, compensation of employees compatible with businesss and workers contributions. To
in the general government is expected to register again that end the main measures included in the proposed
negative growth of -0.5% in 2011 and 1.0% growth in reform of the social security system are as follows:
2012 and 2013. Therefore, it is expected to fall to 11.3%
a) Measures to increase the average effective retirement
of GDP in 2013, from 12.7% of GDP in 2009. This
age limit from 61 today to 63 by 2015. This will be
outcome will be the result of the effective hiring freeze implemented through the abolition of all early retirement
which will be applicable not only in 2010 but in the provisions existing today in many funds, the equalization
following years as well. With this policy it is possible that of retirement age in the public sector between men and
employment in the general government will be reduced by women from 2013 onwards (applying the decision of the
more than 5% in the following 3-years, while the European Court of Justice regarding the equalization
rationalization of operations of various government of the retirement ages for men and women), the
services may further boost wage cost savings in the gradual raising the retirement age from 58 to 63 for
broader public sector. Moreover, wage policy will continue people with 35 years of employment entitled to full
to be restrictive in the broader public sector, as there is pension, the deferment of pension payments to normal
real need for abolishing the sizable wage advantages retirement age if the pensioner is below 55 years old, the
reduction of pensions received for as long as pensioners
which this sector enjoys at the expense of the private
continue to work, provision of incentives to stay on the job
sector. Needless to say that all the above will be growth post-retirement age.
boosting policies for the economy as a whole.
b) Measures to make pension benefits to be determined
In addition to the above intermediate government by contributions. This will be implemented through
consumption which reached 6.0% of GDP in 2009, from instituting a basic pension for all at age 65 of about 360
4.9% of GDP in 2006, registering an increase of 21.8% in (poverty level) from 2018, which will be supplemented
2009, is expected to fall by -10.6% in 2010 and to with a fully-funded pension based on life time
continue to a negative trend in the following years falling contributions. For the transition period, the reform
to the 3.4% of GDP in 2012 and 2013. This will be amounts to granting reduced benefits to people entitled to
achieved through the rationalization of public sector partial pensions.
provisions and also though the substantial increase of the
degree of cost recovery in public sector services and Overall, the successful implementation of the above
entities. This will be the way to apply effective budget measures will affect immediately the rate of growth of
constraints to the operation of the above entities. contributions to the funds (because from now on
benefits will be determined by contributions), taking
The contribution of the budget to the pension system also into account the fact that the process for the
(including civil servants pensions) rose from 8.9 legalization of so far unregistered immigrants is now
billion (4.5% of GDP) in 2005 to 15.8 billion (6.6% of speeded up. Moreover, pensions increases in the
GDP) in 2009. A part of the substantial increase of this following years will be near zero (possibly excluding
contribution in 2009 was due to the surge of social low income pensions). Therefore, the transfers from the
security contribution evasion, which occurred in this budget to the pension system are projected to fall from
year and implied a substantial increase of lost revenue 6.6% of GDP in 2009 to 6.0% in 2010 and to 5.5% of
for the funds to 8 billion at the end of 2009. An GDP in 2011 and 2012 and in the following years.
additional part constituted advance payment for the
needs of pension funds in 2010. Therefore, the Also, planned health care spending cuts, to be
relevant payment included in the 2010 budget is 14.5 implemented through a fundamental reform of the
billion (6.0% of GDP). This item is expected to be countrys health care system, have been set at 0.9
contained further in the following years through the billion in 2011 and at 1.2 billion in 2012.
more permanent crackdown on contribution evasion Direct taxes are estimated to be less than 19% of
and the essential containment of health care GDP in 2009 in Greece, which is much lower than
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
-09
-09
-09
-09
-09
-09
-09
-09
-09
-09
-09
-18% -13%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Greek banks from their expansion and operations in Investment -7,4% -20,2% -4,3% 6,9% 6,6% 8,5%
Housing -29,1% -26,0% -18,8% 7,8% 8,5% 9,5%
GDP GROWTH DEVELOPMENTS AND PROSPECTS: Chnange in reserves and Stat. descrepances
Final domestic demand
147,3%
1,0%
-165,2%
-6,2%
-31,8%
-2,4%
-133,3% 200,0% -13,3%
1,1% 2,4% 2,6%
Uncertainties and risks concerning economic growth in Exports of goods and services 4,0% -16,5% 1,0% 4,5% 4,1% 5,1%
Imports of goods and services 0,2% -24,7% -4,8% 1,5% 2,8% 4,0%
Greece in 2010 and beyond remain high. Despite the External balance -6,7% -41,6% -21,9% -10,0% -3,0% -1,2%
environment and financial system since Q3 2009, the Final Consumption % of GDP 88,8 91,0 89,8 87,2 85,7 84,6
Private consumption % of GDP 72,8 73,0 72,6 71,1 70,7 70,3
need to substantially improve public finances implies a Gross savings % of GDP 11,2 9,0 10,2 12,8 14,3 15,4
Investment % of GDP 21,0 17,1 16,5 17,4 18,1 19,1
much lower public and private consumption growth in Exports of goods and services % of GDP 24,0 20,4 20,9 21,4 21,8 22,3
2010 and the following years, which may offset the Imports of goods and services % of GDP
External balance % of GDP
35,6
-11,6
27,4
-6,9
26,3
-5,5
26,3
-4,8
26,3
-4,6
26,6
-4,4
expected increase in investment and exports and other Chnange in reserves and Stat. descrep. % of GDP 1,8% -1,2% -0,8% 0,3% 0,8% 0,7%
Contributions to GDP growth
improvements elsewhere. As a result, GDP growth in Net exports 0,85 4,83 1,52 0,54 0,14 0,06
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
in SE Asia and in other emerging economies.
However, recent (revised) data from the European
Commission (Diagram 5.) shows that Greeces ULC- INFLATION: CPI inflation reached 2.4% in January 2010,
based real effective exchange rate (REER) against the down from 2.6% in December 2009, from 2.0% in
above 36-countries had appreciated at the end of 2009 by November 2009 and 0.7% in September 2009, 0.5% in
7.6%, which, however, is much less than the appreciation May and June, and 2.0% in Dec. 2008. Core inflation
in the case of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and other (which in Greece excludes unprocessed food and energy
Eurozone countries. This indicates that although a case products) also fell to 1.6% in January 2010, from 1.9% in
can be made concerning Greek international Dec.2009 and 3.4% in Dec.2008. Inflation in Greece is
competitiveness against most emerging economies and expected to fall again to 2.3% in March 2010, to 2.2% in
especially China and other countries of SE Asia, the case August 2010 and in 1.9% in December 2010. Average
of deteriorating Greeces international competitiveness inflation fell to 1.1% for 2009 as a whole, from 4.2% in
within the Eurozone does not stand. Moreover, according 2008 and is expected to increase to 2.2% in 2010.
to data published by the European Commission, ULC growth Overall, Greek CPI inflation remains higher than in the
reached 3.5% in 2007, 3.9% in 2008 and 2.5% in 2009 in Eurozone, as Greece is still experiencing higher growth in
Greece, compared with 1.6% and 3.4% and 3.4% domestic public utilities prices.
respectively in the Eurozone. As a result, the Greek REER
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS: The current account deficit
appreciated by 1.3% in 2007, 1.7% in 2008 and 0.9% in
(CAD), which includes net capital transfers, fell in Jan.-
2009, compared with 1.8%, 3.9% and 4.5% respectively in
November 2009 by -22.2%, reaching 21.58 billion or
the Euro area. Therefore, Greek international
9.0% of GDP, from 11.6% of GDP in Jan.-Nov. 2008.
competitiveness in 2007-2009 has not worsened against the
Developments in the Greek BoP in 2009 reveal the effect
Eurozone average, but it has worsened with respect to
of the substantial fall of domestic demand in Greece due
countries which are experiencing exchange rate depreciation
to the international economic crisis.
with respect to the Euro. Overall, the challenge for Greece to
reign in domestic wage growth is now more pressing as Of particular importance was the substantial fall of the
competition to gain market share in international markets will deficit of the trade balance by -31.7% as a result of the
be even more intense in the following years. fall of exports of goods by -24.6% and the even higher fall
of imports of goods by -29.5%. In fact, payments for
In any event, Greece is a very small economy and can
imports of fuels were 5.9 billion lower than in Jan.-Nov
regain its growth dynamics through exports of goods and
2008. Also, payments for imports of goods excluding fuels
services (tourism, shipping) in a world economy which is
and ships were lower by 9.5 billion, while the
entering a robust growth path. In the period of fiscal
corresponding fall in exports excluding fuels and ships did
adjustment, Greeces REERULC will turn downwards, while
not exceed 2.48 billion.
at the same time Germanys and other developed countrys
REERULC will turn gradually upwards. Greece will become A second important development was the fall by -27.0%
more competitive and more export oriented. This way it can of the surplus of the balance of services, as a result of the
again have positive growth from 2011 onwards. At the same fall by -10.8% of earnings from external tourism, as well
billion from Greek banks to banks outside Greece. ASE Compostive FTSE 20 FTSE Mid Cap 40 FTSE Small Cap 80
9%
MONEY & FINANCIAL MARKETS: Under the currency
6% board arrangement, the Bulgarian Lev is tied to the euro,
3% so the Bulgarian Central Bank has limited discretion in
adjusting monetary conditions. Political commitment to
0%
2006 2007 2008 2009 the currency board arrangement remains strong, and the
Headline Core peg is expected to stay in place until euro adoption which
may happen in 2014 at the earliest. Alcohol The real
BALANCE OF PAYMENTS: In 2009 the current account
effective exchange rate (REER) of the Lev continued to
declined by -66% y/y to 2.9 billion or an estimated 8.6%
appreciate in 2009, despite the sharp drop in inflation
of full-year GDP. This marks a substantial improvement
compared, due in large part to the fall in the value of the
following the 22.5% of GDP in 2008. Driving this
currencies of many of the countrys trade competitors.
correction was the deficit on the trade balance which
However at this stage concerns about competitiveness
declined by -99% y/y to 4.1 billion. Merchandise exports
are very unlikely to prompt a move away from the
declined -23% to 11.8 billion while imports declined by
currency board. Additional pressure may arise though if
-33% to 15.9 billion. The balance on the Services
Latvia and the other Baltic states were to abandon their
Account increased 77% y/y to 1.4 billion while the deficit
currency pegs, though the BNB would most likely still act
on the Income Account declined to -727 million. The
to maintain the currency board arrangement.
financial and capital account saw net inflows decline to
2.6 billion in 2009 from 11.7 billion in 2008. While Net Bank lending continues to slow, from 62.7% and 31.6% in
FDI inflows declined by -55% y/y to 2.52 billion in 2009, 2007 and 2008 respectively, to 3.8% y/y in December
coverage of the current account deficit increased to 93% 2009. Lending to households slowed to 5.8% in
versus 70% in 2008. Of total FDI inflows, roughly 1.2 December from 31.3% in December 2008, while lending
billion was related to financial investment, including equity to businesses slowed to 2.6% from 31.8% in December
capital, with 500 million directed towards real estate, 2009. Credit penetration increased to 78.8% of forecast
construction, tourism, trade, and office areas. State GDP versus 66.7% in 2007. Bank deposits increased by
officials currently forecast that FDI may increase to 7.4% y/y in December, down from 34.4% in 2007 and
around 3.3 billion in 2010 from an estimated 2.7 billion 9.2% in 2008. Term deposits increased by 15.3% y/y in
in 2009 and 6.8 billion in 2008. The current account December from 22.3% end-2008, while Sight & Savings
deficit is forecast to decline to 6.7% of GDP in 2010 and deposits decreased -10.1.% y/y in December. The loan-
4.9% in 2011. to-deposit ratio now stands at 1.32.
EXTERNAL DEBT & INT. RESERVES: While gross external 4. CYPRUS
debt declined by -2% y/y it increased by 0.3% m/m to ECONOMIC OVERVIEW: Economic activity has contracted
36.99 billion by end-November due largely to an by an estimated -1.0% in 2009, which reflects the
negative impact of the global financial crisis on
Moreover, at the start of January 2010, following The Albanian parliament approved a loan agreement
considerable rise in dinar liquidity in the banking system between the governments of Albania and Saudi Arabia
due to funds received from the IMF, the central bank took with the aim of financing the construction of Shkozet
to selling 17 million with the aim of boosting support for overpass and the water drainage collector in the area.
the Dinar. However, by the end of January, the Dinar hit a The investment is estimated to reach some 8.4 million,
new all-time low against the Euro of RSD 98.8/ despite granted by Saudi Arabian state Fund for Development.
the 89 million intervention of the central bank on the The funds will be geared towards the second phase of the
forex market, which comes on the top of 110 million that project for the Durres overpass. The first phase was
the central bank sold on the interbank market since the financed by Kuwaiti Fund for Arab Economic
start of 2010. The Dinars weakness was largely due to Development.
strong demand for foreign currency driven by higher FISCAL POLICY: The general government budget posted a
energy imports and the repayment of debts to foreign deficit of ALL 64.5bn (EUR 468mn) or roughly -5.6% of
creditors as well as the conversion of funds received from projected GDP during Jan-Nov 2009 and is forecast at -6.9%
the IMF and the EU. The dinar lost 7.6% in nominal terms for 2009 as a whole. The sharp rise in the deficit was largely
against the euro in 2009 in response to which the Central due to a 16.3% y/y increase government spending to ALL
Bank used 656.9 million in interventions in the forex 332.6bn, driven by significant growth in public investments
market in 2009 in a bid to support the currency. More related to several large infrastructure projects. Government
recently the central bank sold 41 million as it intervened revenue increased a modest 2.2% y/y to ALL 268.2bn. The
on the forex market on the 2nd February. Despite the ministry of finance has drawn a second tranche worth
intervention, the dinar slid 0.17% against the Euro to the 100 million from a 250 million syndicated loan. The
tobacco increased by 4.1% y/y, following the 5.8% y/y LEK vs. EUR
140 1m
increase for tobacco products. For the year as a whole, 3m
6m
average inflation declined to 2.2% y/y in 2009 from 3.4% 135
Real GDP Growth 4,9 2,9 4,5 4,5 2,0 -2,0 -1,0
Gross Fixed Total Investments (including stocks) 0,1 -3,6 8,1 4,9 -7,4 -20,2 -4,3
- Residential Investment -1,9 0,0 29,1 -6,8 -29,1 -26,0 -18,8
- Equipment 12,7 -1,0 14,2 9,1 6,3 -25,0 -2,0
Manufacturing production 1,2 -0,8 1,4 1,8 -4,2 -11,2 1,0
Unemployment (percent) 10,2 9,5 8,6 8,0 7,4 9,0 9,9
Employment 0,9 1,5 2,5 1,3 1,2 -1,1 -0,5
Consumer Price Index (year average) 2,9 3,5 3,2 2,9 4,2 1,1 2,2
Unit Labor Cost 1,8 3,7 4,6 3,5 3,9 5,8 1,4
Credit Expansion (Private Sector) 19,5 21,8 19,7 20,0 15,9 4,2 5,0
Government Deficit (as % of GDP) -7,4 -5,1 -2,6 -3,6 -7,8 -12,7 -8,7
Current Account (as % of GDP) -4,5 -6,3 -9,6 -12,4 -12,7 -10,3 -8,0
Source: Official National Accounts, Jan.2010 and Alpha Bank Research
Cyprus 2006 2007 2008 2009 (e) 2010 (f) Serbia 2006 2007 2008 2009 (e) 2010 (f)
Real Economy Real Economy
Real GDP 4.1 4.4 3.7 -1.0 0.3 Real GDP 5.2 6.9 5.4 -3.0 1.5
Private Consumption 4.5 6.9 7.0 -0.2 0.2 Private Consumption 7.0 7.5 6.0 -1.2 3.9
Government Consumption 7.4 -0.1 8.7 1.5 3.1 Government Consumption 2.5 2.0 1.0 0.6 1.5
Gross Fixed Investment 10.5 7.6 9.8 -3.0 0.9 Gross Fixed Investment 9.0 8.6 10.0 -3.2 4.1
Exports (Goods & Services) 3.8 7.5 1.1 -8.8 0.7 Exports (Goods & Services) 5.8 5.7 5.4 -7.0 6.0
Imports (Goods & Services) 6.6 11.1 9.9 -12.1 -1.5 Imports (Goods & Services) 8.4 8.0 7.3 -10.0 4.5
Prices Prices
HICP Inflation (Avg) 2.2 2.2 4.4 0.4 2.0 Consumer Price Inflation (Avg) 12.7 6.5 11.7 8.4 5.1
General Government (%GDP) General Government (%GDP)
Overall Balance -1.2 3.4 0.9 -6.1 -5.7 Overall Balance -1.6 -1.9 -2.2 -3.2 -4.0
Balance of Payments (% GDP) Balance of Payments (% GDP)
Current Account Balance -7.0 -12.0 -17.2 -6.7 -7.2 Current Account Balance -10.1 -15.6 -17.3 -6.5 -6.5
Albania 2006 2007 2008 2009 (e) 2010 (f) FYROM 2006 2007 2008 2009 (e) 2010 (f)
Real Economy Real Economy
Real GDP 5.4 6.0 6.8 4.0 2.2 Real GDP 4.0 5.9 5.0 -1.3 2.0
Private Consumption - - - - - Private Consumption 6.0 9.8 7.8 -0.5 0.8
Government Consumption - - - - - Government Consumption 1.8 0.4 9.5 -8.4 2.2
Gross Fixed Investment - - - - - Gross Fixed Investment 11.6 13.1 18.8 -10.7 2.4
Exports (Goods & Services) - - - - - Exports (Goods & Services) 14.3 -9.6 -14.0 -12.0 2.8
Imports (Goods & Services) - - - - - Imports (Goods & Services) 10.9 17.4 -4.9 -10.9 1.1
Prices Prices
CPI Inflation (Avg) 2.4 2.9 3.4 2.2 2.0 CPI Inflation (Avg) 3.3 2.8 7.2 -0.8 0.8
General Government (%GDP) General Government (%GDP)
Overall Balance -3.2 -3.3 -5.4 -6.9 -4.7 Overall Balance -0.5 0.6 -1.0 -2.8 -2.5
Balance of Payments (% GDP) Balance of Payments (% GDP)
Current Account Balance -5.6 -9.1 -14.1 -12.1 -8.0 Current Account Balance -0.9 -7.2 -13.1 -9.5 -8.2
Ukraine 2006 2007 2008 2009 (e) 2010 (f) Turkey 2006 2007 2008 2009 (e) 2010 (f)
Real Economy Real Economy
Real GDP 7.4 7.7 2.2 -14.5 3.2 Real GDP 6.9 4.6 1.1 -5.8 2.8
Private Consumption 14.1 15.3 6.5 -18.2 -0.8 Private Consumption 4.6 4.6 0.3 -4.9 2.2
Government Consumption 4.9 2.9 2.0 0.5 0.8 Government Consumption 8.4 6.5 1.8 3.2 1.8
Gross Fixed Investment 20.9 24.9 2.5 -42.0 2.3 Gross Fixed Investment 13.3 5.4 -4.6 -20.6 3.1
Exports (Goods & Services) -5.8 2.8 -4.8 -15.4 0.5 Exports (Goods & Services) 6.6 7.3 2.6 -10.4 1.9
Imports (Goods & Services) 8.3 20.2 5.0 -34.4 -1.9 Imports (Goods & Services) 6.9 10.7 -3.1 -19.6 4.8
Prices Prices
CPI Inflation (Avg) 9.1 12.8 25.2 15.9 11.0 CPI Inflation (Avg) 9.3 8.8 10.4 6.1 5.6
General Government (%GDP) General Government (%GDP)
Overall Balance -0.7 -1.1 -1.5 -7.0 -4.0 Overall Balance 1.2 -1.0 -2.2 -7.9 -6.8
Balance of Payments (% GDP) Balance of Payments (% GDP)
Current Account Balance -1.5 -3.7 -7.2 0.4 0.2 Current Account Balance -6.0 -5.8 -5.7 -2.1 -3.7
Source: IMF, Economist Intelligence Unit, Central Bank, Eurostat, Alpha Bank Economic Research
This report reflects the opinions of the analysts of Alpha Banks Economic Analysis Division. Any information in this report is based on data obtained from
sources considered to be reliable; Alpha Bank takes no responsibility for any individual investment decisions based thereon.
No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without the permission of the publisher.
Please address any comments or inquiries to: Michael Massourakis, Group Chief Economist
Economic Research Division, Panepistimiou 43, Athens, 10564 Greece
Tel: (+30) 210-326-2828 Fax: (+30) 210-326-2812
E-mail: dom@alpha.gr Web Site: www.alpha.gr
GREECE AND SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE
The next Greece and Southeastern Europe Economic & Financial OutlookEwill be published
CONOMIC in May O
AND FINANCIAL 2010.
UTLOOK PAGE 24