What Is An Abstract
What Is An Abstract
An abstract is a self-contained, short, and powerful statement that describes a larger work. Components
vary according to discipline. An abstract of a social science or scientific work may contain the scope,
purpose, results, and contents of the work. An abstract of a humanities work may contain the thesis,
background, and conclusion of the larger work. An abstract is not a review, nor does it evaluate the work
being abstracted. While it contains key words found in the larger work, the abstract is an original document
rather than an excerpted passage.
(This list of elements is adapted with permission from Philip Koopman, How to Write an Abstract.)
Motivation:
Why do we care about the problem and the results? If the problem isn't
obviously "interesting" it might be better to put motivation first; but if your
work is incremental progress on a problem that is widely recognized as
important, then it is probably better to put the problem statement first to
indicate which piece of the larger problem you are breaking off to work on.
This section should include the importance of your work, the difficulty of
the area, and the impact it might have if successful.
Problem statement:
What problem are you trying to solve? What is the scope of your work (a
generalized approach, or for a specific situation)? Be careful not to use too
much jargon. In some cases it is appropriate to put the problem statement
before the motivation, but usually this only works if most readers already
understand why the problem is important.
Approach:
How did you go about solving or making progress on the problem? Did you
use simulation, analytic models, prototype construction, or analysis of field
data for an actual product? What was the extent of your work (did you look
at one application program or a hundred programs in twenty different
programming languages?) What important variables did you control, ignore,
or measure?
Results:
What's the answer? Specifically, most good computer architecture papers
conclude that something is so many percent faster, cheaper, smaller, or
otherwise better than something else. Put the result there, in numbers. Avoid
vague, hand-waving results such as "very", "small", or "significant." If you
must be vague, you are only given license to do so when you can talk about
orders-of-magnitude improvement. There is a tension here in that you
should not provide numbers that can be easily misinterpreted, but on the
other hand you don't have room for all the caveats.
Conclusions:
What are the implications of your answer? Is it going to change the world
(unlikely), be a significant "win", be a nice hack, or simply serve as a road
sign indicating that this path is a waste of time (all of the previous results are
useful). Are your results general, potentially generalizable, or specific to a
particular case?
What is the background and the research context of your creative work?
If your project presentation involves a performance with a lecture, how does your lecture
provide a research context for your performance?
Your conclusion will be what your project contributed to the discipline or what new
knowledge your project created.
Explain the significance of your results or how your results might be generalized.
If the project isnt complete, state the kinds of results you expect.