Integral Ram Rocket
Integral Ram Rocket
Integral Ram Rocket
Operation
In a conventional chemical rocket engine the rocket carries with itself in flight both its fuel
and its oxidizer. The chemical reaction between the fuel and the oxidizer produces reactant
products which are nominally gasses at the pressures and temperatures in the rocket's
combustion chamber. The reaction is also highly energetic (exothermic) releasing
tremendous energy in the form of heat; that is imparted to the reactant products in the
combustion chamber giving this mass enormous internal energy which, when expanded
through a nozzle is capable of producing very high exhaust velocities. The exhaust is
directed rearward through the nozzle, thereby producing a thrust forward.
In this conventional design, the fuel/oxidizer mixture is both the working mass and energy
source that accelerates it. It is easy to demonstrate that the best performance is had if the
working mass is as low as possible. Hydrogen, by itself, is the theoretical best rocket fuel.
Mixing this with oxygen in order to burn it lowers the overall performance of the system by
raising the mass of the exhaust, as well as greatly increasing the mass that has to be carried
aloft – oxygen is much heavier than hydrogen.
One method of increasing the overall performance of the system is to collect either the fuel
or the oxidizer during flight. Fuel is hard to come by in the atmosphere, but oxidizer in the
form of gaseous oxygen makes up to 20% of the air and there are a number of designs that
take advantage of this fact. These sorts of systems have been explored in the liquid air cycle
engine (LACE).
Another idea is to collect the working mass. With an air-augmented rocket, an otherwise
conventional rocket engine is mounted in the center of a long tube, open at the front. As
the rocket moves through the atmosphere the air enters the front of the tube, where it is
compressed via the ram effect. As it travels down the tube it is further compressed and
mixed with the fuel-rich exhaust from the rocket engine, which heats the air much as a
combustor would in a ramjet. In this way a fairly small rocket can be used to accelerate a
much larger working mass than normal, leading to significantly higher thrust within the
atmosphere.
Advantages
The effectiveness of this simple method can be dramatic. Typical solid rockets have
a specific impulse of about 260 seconds (2.5 kN·s/kg), but using the same fuel in an air-
augmented design can improve this to over 500 seconds (4.9 kN·s/kg), a figure even the
best hydrogen/oxygen engines can't match. This design can even be slightly more efficient
than a ramjet as the exhaust from the rocket engine compresses the air more than a ramjet
normally would; this raises the combustion efficiency as a longer, more efficient nozzle can
be employed. Another advantage is that the rocket works even at zero forward speed,
whereas a ramjet requires forward motion to feed air into the engine.
Disadvantages
It might be envisaged that such an increase in performance would be widely deployed, but
various issues frequently preclude this. The intakes of high-speed engines are difficult to
design, and they can't simply be located anywhere on the airframe whilst getting reasonable
performance – in general the entire airframe needs to be built around the intake design.
Another problem is that the air eventually runs out, so the amount of additional thrust is
limited by how fast the rocket climbs. Finally, the air ducting weighs about 5× to 10×
more] than an equivalent rocket that gives the same thrust. This slows the vehicle quite a bit
towards the end of the burn.