06 Alvarez
06 Alvarez
06 Alvarez
5 (1997) : 59-68.
James’s approach to the autobiographical genre is quite unusual. By the end of the
nineteenth century, the writing of autobiography had become “sufficiently
widespread to generate the kind, if not the degree, of popular, critical, and scholarly
interest that we take for granted today” (Spengemann 177). But Henry James
delineates mental states rather than external facts, applying his center of
consciousness technique to the author himself, considering that a life of the
imagination is as adventurous as a life of action:
The first began long ago, far off, and yet glimmers at me there as out of a thin golden haze, with all the
charm, for imagination and memory ... of the wonder of consciousness in
everything. (Autobiography 4)
In some strange way, his writing of his late novels was also “a reliving of his earlier
life; as if in middle age he had to re-examine, to try again, old artistic experiences,
and test them in his maturity” (Edel 28).
When James wrote his autobiography at the age of seventy, he knew that his own
life had been far different from other novelists, and for this reason A Small Boy and
Others (1912), Notes of a Son and Brother (1913) and The Middle Years (1917) can
be read as James’s justification for his choice to live his life as observer and artist.
This explains why throughout his literary career he presents a series of male
characters who alter the traditional equation of masculinity with action on behalf of
passive males. The complex style in the latest part of his fiction permitted him to
portray a range of masculine behavior against the usual forms of manhood in
European and American societies: the lives of Ralph Touchett in The Portrait of a
Lady (1881), Hyacinth Robinson in The Princess Cassamassima (1886), or
Lambert Strether in The Ambassadors (1903), among others, are excluded from
patriarchal privileges. This literary form, which permits a more intimate,
inaccessible James to emerge, consists essentially of “taste achieved through
intelligent discrimination: the end of the process of aestheticising experience” (Cox
7). James’s purpose in all his works was to register the slightest motions of
consciousness. In the densely textured prose of his Autobiography, where he
narrates the experiences of his later years, he does this mainly in a new form that
can be considered his “fourth phase.” In the first volume, he also sets down the
experience of his boyhood, not probably as it was, but as it lives in his memory, as
it re-emerges when he allows his mind to play upon it and to see it as preliminary to
all that followed. James’s study in the “perspectives of memory,” according to M.
H. Abraham, “shares a number of features with creative autobiography—the more-
or-less fictional work of art about the development of the artist himself—that began
with Wordsworth in the nineteenth century and includes Proust, Yeats, Joyce and
Nabokov among its practitioners in the twentieth century” (80). In fact, to read
James’s Autobiography, “the mediacy of self-consciousness as well as the
immediacy of feeling” are required, since we understand James’s language to be “a
genuine activity of shaping reality” (Getz 207).
Most critics have reacted favorably toward the subjectivity of A Small Boy and
Others, and this can in part be explained by James’s reputation in England during
the previous two decades: The Tragic Muse(1890) had been received with certain
indifference, almost ignored, since James had lost that wide public appeal he had
acquired at the height of his “international phase,” but during the next decade he
began to develop “a passionate following among a young generation of artistic and
intellectual elite” (Holly 574). To understand the curve of James’s career as a
whole we must recognize that when he abandoned the “international theme” in the
1890s, he had already found “the different ways to establish the outsider character
of his hero and heroine: the protagonists are doubly strangled—kept from their
spiritual inheritance by a social world that limits and defines them, and isolates
them within that world by their aspirations and fineness of spirit” (Lyons 65). Also,
in the novels that follow this period, What Maisie Knew (1897), The Turn of the
Screw (1898), The Awkward Age (1899), and The Sacred Fount (1901), that
possibility is ambiguous or even ironically fulfilled, but it is tempting to see
James’s technical experimentation in these works, mainly in the shift of the point of
view and the absence of a direct authorial voice which will be an important element
in the late novels. What happens is that James “shifts the drama of consciousness
from being merely compensatory to being efficacious, from being an escape from
reality to being a means of transforming it—there is an access of power that has
enlarged the scope of the imagination’s force and task” (Lyons 76).
Pre-Freudian critics approached A Small Boy and Others for insight into what the
nineteenth century defined as central to the artist’s soul, i.e., his creative genius.
What they found, however, “was indistinguishable from James’s own” (Holly
575).They also observed an absence of historical signposts, which “arouse[d] the
sort of impatience that had been directed at James’s writings since the late 1890s,
because of his complicated and abstract style” (Holly 577). This is not the case
with The American Scene, where Donald Wolff finds a literary form that he calls
“rhetorical historiography,” since it “approximates Hegel’s conceptual history,
which focuses not only on the cultural life of a nation but also uses that material to
speculate about the future, about the direction of history in general” (Wolff 155)
James sees his childhood as a marvelous experience for the senses, a joyous uproar
of the mind, while he wanders through the streets of New York without any fixed
direction, feeding himself with impressions, vibrations. Yet, what is more
important, he applies to another literary genre, an autobiography, the subtle
psychological analysis he had introduced into his novels, and the result is probably
the most exquisitely accurate record of the growing consciousness of “a small boy”
in all literature, a small boy who notices his otherness, but without realizing what it
means:
In that early time I seem to have been constantly eager to exchange my lot for that of somebody else, on
the assumed certainty of gaining by the bargain. (Autobiography 101)
This otherness was produced by his family’s different values and customs. As
Quentin Anderson affirms in The American Henry James (352), James becomes
the passionate pilgrim in his discovery of Europe, but he also becomes the restless
research spirit of the American scene and of his social and family environment:
... he opened up to us, though perhaps to me in particular, who could absorb all that was given me on
those suggestive lines, prospects and possibilities that made the future flush and
swarm. (Autobiography 287)
James emphasizes his slowly growing passion for the sense of Europe, instilled in
him during his infancy abroad and enlarged throughout his life:
... a castle and a ruin ... a woman in a black bodice ... in that static vision was Europe a sublime
synthesis, expressed and guaranteed to me—as if a mystic gape, which spread all through the summer
air, that I should now, only now, never lose it, hold the whole consistency of it. (Autobiography 161)
For James, Europe embodied the most complete concept of Art: “Art, art, art, don’t
you see? Learn, little gaping pilgrims, what that is!” (Autobiography 191).
Nevertheless, Europe could offer not only beauty, and art, and supreme design, but
also “history and fame and power, the world, in fine, raised to the richest and
noblest expression” (Autobiography 196). His connection with the past still hung
thickly on him: “its majesties and symmetries, comparatively vague and general,
were subjects to the happy accident, the charming lapse and the odd extrusion, a
bonhomie of chance composition and color now quite purged away”
(Autobiography 186-187). All these experiences he acquired, through every small
detail he observed, fed the small boy and future great writer:
... that life and manners were more pointedly and harmoniously expressed, under our noses there, than
we had perhaps found them anywhere save in the most salient passages of stories. (Autobiography 190)
In his Autobiography James presented his literary vocation as a kind of second birth
which required all kinds of sacrifices. And although it sometimes became a
success, it was a bitter struggle: “at that age mustn’t I quite have succumbed to the
charm of the world seen in a large way? For there, incomparably, was the chance to
dawdle and gape” (Autobiography 19-20). He places the narrative in his own
reminiscing consciousness, permitting his memory to flow in a way that Carol
Holly calls “controlled association.” However, trying to approach the
autobiographical genre from a different perspective, James avoids an overly
dangerous psychological terrain and recollects his “myriad memories from the
past” more or less in the order in which they occur to him, reshaping them into “the
story of his developing consciousness of the past as it lived in the present,”
becoming “both the subject and the medium of the book” (578). Thus, it offers the
clues that can help us to solve most questions about his ambivalent behavior: “Can
the peculiar void at the center of Henry James’s personality be explained?” Richard
Hall asks, “Can there be some reason for his adoption of the life unlived, the beast
forever crouched, as the central metaphor in his work be offered?” (25) Cándido
Pérez Gállego also asks himself: “What is Henry James’s purpose with so many
unhappy endings in his love stories?” (222). There is a central episode in A Small
Boy and Others which can help us to understand those questions. It refers vaguely
to a dark hurt James suffered in his youth:
... a passage of personal history the most entirely personal, but between which, as a private catastrophe
or difficulty, bristling with embarrassment, and the great public convulsion that announced itself in
bigger terms each day, I felt from the very first an association of the closest, yet withal, I fear, almost of
the least clearly expressible. (Autobiography 414)
This “physical mishap” produced by the fire during the Civil War at that “dark
hour”—and whose effects “were to draw themselves out incalculably and
intolerably” (Autobiography 414)—seems to be the cause of a depression that
tormented him for the rest of his life.
There is also an important event; in fact, this is the climax of A Small Boy and
Others —which may help to clarify James’s behavior: the dream, or nightmare, of
the Gallerie d’Apollon, in the Louvre Museum. This episode shows James pushing
back suddenly a spectral pursuer who threatens to destroy him:
... in a summer dawn many years later, to the fortunate, the instantaneous recovery and capture of the
most appalling yet most admirable nightmare of my life ... the sudden pursuit, through an open door,
along a huge high saloon, of a just dimly-described figure that retreated in terror before my rush and
dash (a glare of inspired reaction from irresistible but shameful dread), put of the
room. (Autobiography 196)
The experience ends happily. As James says, “he sped for his life,” but this
nightmare seems to reflect the young Henry frightened by his elder brother:
He was always round the corner and out of sight, coming back into view but at his hours of extremest
ease. We were never in the same schoolroom, in the same game, scarce even in step together or in the
same phase at the same time; when our phases overlapped, that is, it was only for the moment—he was
clean out before I had got well in. How far he had really at any moment dashed forward it is not for me
now to attempt to say; what comes to me is that I at least hung inveterately and woefully back, and that
this relation alike to our interests and to each other seemed proper and preappointed. (Autobiography 8)
James’s childhood and adolescent atmosphere was mainly influenced by the sibling
rivalry between his elder brother and himself. Leon Edel thinks that the tense
relationship between the two brothers changed Henry’s purpose, and instead of
writing William’s biography, he became the main character. This shows the need
Henry felt to be placed outstandingly in the family picture—a highly competitive
circle:
I taste again in that pure air no ghost of success—a reward of effort for
which I remember to have heard at home no good word ... we were to convert and
convert, success—in the sense that was in the general air—or no success; and simply everything that
should happen to us, every contact, every impression and every experience we should know, were to
form our soluble stuff; with only ourselves to thank should remain unaware, by the time our perceptions
were decently developed, of the substance finally projected and most desirable. That substance might be
just consummately Virtue, as a social race and value. (Autobiography 122-123)
Father’s Ideas
The Jameses belonged to an age which can be called “the classic years of the great
American-European legend”: they were pioneers in the American rediscovery of
Europe, the evaluation of Art, the growing of personality and the spiritualization of
the Old Continent’s values. And the ambivalence produced by his “father’s
ideas”—he wanted all the family to travel from one town to another all over
Europe and his children to change schools, while they went to museums, concerts,
theatres—modeled him as a cosmopolitan writer:
It was a luxury, I today see, to have all the benefit of his intellectual and spiritual, his religious, his
philosophic and his social passion, without ever feeling the pressure of it to our direct irritation or
discomfort ... The entire impulse to this devotion figured for us, comprehensively and familiarly,
as Father’s Ideas, of the force and truth of which in his own view we were always so
respectful. (Autobiography 330-331)
His father’s theories about religious and philosophical matters were first influenced
by Swedenborg, as James explains in his Autobiography:
... there brought to his knowledge, by a wondrous chance, the possibility that the great Swedenborg,
from whom he had drawn much light, might have something to say to his case. (Autobiography 340)
And later on by Fourier, where Henry James Sr. found the scientific explanation for
a new life on Earth:
Our father, like so many free spirits of that time in New York and Boston, had been much interested in
the writings of Charles Fourier and in his schemes of the phalanstery as the solution of human
troubles. (Autobiography205)
These theories undoubtedly made his son sensitive to spiritual life, but without
answering the calls of any particular church. For this reason, religious beliefs of
any kind are not found in his work, but a moral sense is indeed implicit in it:
It comes over me as I read them (more than ever before,) how intensely original and personal his whole
system was, and how indispensable it is that those who go in for religion should take some heed of it. I
can’t enter into it (much) myself—I can’t be so theological nor grant his extraordinary premises, nor
throw myself into conceptions of heavens and hells, nor be sure that the keynote of nature is humanity,
etc. But I can greatly enjoy the spirit, the feeling, and the manner of the whole. (Letters 112-113)
The love Henry James Sr. felt for his wife is also essential for the development of
the novelist’s career. Knight Aldrich thinks that “the myth of the mother is a
question-key in James’s fiction; this symbolizespossession in most cases” (373).
An example of it is Mrs Grose in “The Turn of the Screw”: she “may have
represented his mother, in reality a destructive woman, but a woman of whom
James was so afraid that he had to repress his perception of her evil characteristics
and consciously could only see her as good” (373).
Thus, based on James’s thought that the husband derived his strength from his wife
and, reciprocally, the woman could appropriate the man’s life, Edel developed his
“vampire” theory, since “the wife helped her husband so much that he could not
live by himself.” This was what happened to his father, who died some months
after his mother, “being even a menace for him, who submitted to a ridiculous
dependence” (55). It is the main theme of The Sacred Fount, and if Love meant
danger and to be taken to the conjugal bed meant death, perhaps for this reason
James chose the safest way and remained single, without thinking of getting
married for the rest of his life.
This lack of feminine contacts has also been related by his critics to a passional
frustration in Minny Temple. Nevertheless, James’s ambiguous personality could
be better understood after the publication of his cousin’s letters in Notes of a Son
and Brother, the second volume of his memories, and the expressions he dedicated
to her explain her legendary meaning for the writer:
... slim and fair and quick, all straightness and charming tossed head, with long light and yet almost
sliding steps and a large light postponing, renouncing laugh, the very muse or amateur priestess of rash
speculation. To express her in the mere terms of her restless young mind, one felt truth, under the
shadow of female earnestness—for which she was much too unliteral and too ironic; so that,
superlatively personal and yet as independent, as offinto higher spaces, at a touch, as all the breadth of
her sympathy and her courage could send her, she made it impossible to say whether she was just the
most moving of maidens or a disengaged and dancing flame of thought ... the enthusiasm of humanity,
but she burned herself out. (Autobiography 283-284)
According to Edel, Henry loved Minny in his own way: “as much as he was
capable of loving any woman, as much as Winterbourne, uncertain and doubting in
his frosty bewilderment, loved Daisy, or the invalid Ralph loved Isabel: a
questioning love, unvoiced and unavowed, and not fully fathomed” (326). His
cousin was for James a questionable love that could neither be defined nor
declared. Minny appeared before Henry
... as radiant and rare, extinguished in her first youth, but after having made an impression on many
persons, and on ourselves not least, which was to become in the harmonious circle, for all time, matter
of sacred legend and reference of associated piety. (Autobiography 10)
As Howells had done before, Christof Wegelin calls James “the inventor of the
American girl” (56-59). The heroine of the first international story, “Traveling
Companions,” is modeled on Minny, and anticipates Daisy Miller, Isabel Archer
and Milly Theale—those “heroines of the scene” who were “absolutely afraid of
nothing,” who lived “with enough sincerity and enough wonder,” and also “with
such lightness of forms, so inconsequently grave at the core” (Autobiography 506-
510).
Conclusion
In short, with his Autobiography Henry James finally reached the summit of his
literary career, by combining all his previous artistic achievements in a synthesis of
the past and present, and by using a new literary form, which permitted not only
these conflicting frameworks to exist but also both views to be contained
simultaneously, since for him
... to knock at the door of the past was in a word to see it open to me quite wide—to see the world
within begin to compose with a grace of his own. (Autobiography 3)
Works Cited
Egan, Michael. Henry James: The Ibsen Years. London: Vision Press, 1972.
Getz, Thomas H. “Henry James: The Novel as Act.” The Henry James Review 4.3
(1983) : 207-18.
Hall, Richard. “An Obscure Hurt: The Sexuality of Henry James.” The New
Republic 28 April 1979 : 25-31.
James, Henry. Letters. Ed. Percy Lubbock, 1920. New York: Octagon Books, 1970.
-----. Autobiography: A Small Boy and Others, Notes of a Son and Brother, The
Middle Years. Ed. Frederick W. Dupee. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
1983.
Long, Robert Emmet. The Great Succession: Henry James and the Legacy of
Hawthorne. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1979.