GPSX - Techref 01

GPS-X Technical Reference
GPS-X Version 6.2

ii
Copyright ©1992-2012 Hydromantis Environmental Software Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced in any form or by any means -
graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, or storage in an
information retrieval system - without the prior written permission of the copyright owner.
The information contained within this document is subject to change without notice.
Hydromantis Environmental Software Solutions, Inc. makes no warranty of any kind with
regard to this material, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability
and fitness for a particular purpose. Hydromantis Environmental Software Solutions, Inc., shall
not be liable for errors contained herein or for incidental consequential damages in connection
with the furnishing, performance, or use of this material.
Trademarks
GPS-X and all other Hydromantis trademarks and logos mentioned and/or displayed are
trademarks or registered trademarks of Hydromantis Environmental Software Solutions, Inc. in
Canada and in other countries.
ACSL is a registered trademark of AEgis Research Corporation
Adobe and Acrobat are trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated
MATLAB is a registered trademark of The MathWorks, Inc.
JAVA is a trademark of Oracle Corporation.
Microsoft, Windows, Windows Server, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, and
Windows 8 are trademarks of Microsoft Corporation.
GPS-X uses selected Free and Open Source licensed components. Please see the readme.txt file
in the installation directory for details.
PRINTING DATE: November 2012

Table of Contents iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAP T ER 1 .........................................................................................................11
Modelling Fundamentals ...................................................................................................................................................... 11
Introduction to Modelling and Simulation ......................................................................................................................... 11
Why COD is Important to Know........................................................................................................................................ 14
Data Requirements ............................................................................................................................................................. 15
CHAP T ER 2 .........................................................................................................21
GPS-X Objects ...................................................................................................................................................................... 21
What is an Object?.............................................................................................................................................................. 21
Types of Objects ................................................................................................................................................................. 21
CHAP T ER 3 .........................................................................................................25
GPS-X State Variable Libraries .......................................................................................................................................... 25
What is a Library? .............................................................................................................................................................. 25
Types of Libraries .............................................................................................................................................................. 25
Carbon - Nitrogen Library (CNLIB) .................................................................................................................................. 26
Industrial Pollutant Library (CNIPLIB) ............................................................................................................................. 26
Carbon - Nitrogen - Phosphorus Library (CNPLIB) .......................................................................................................... 28
CNP Industrial Pollutant Library (CNPIPLIB) .................................................................................................................. 28
Advanced Carbon - Nitrogen Library (CN2LIB) ............................................................................................................... 30
Advanced Industrial Pollutant Library (CN2IPLIB) .......................................................................................................... 31
Comprehensive library (mantis2LIB) ................................................................................................................................. 32
CHAP T ER 4 .........................................................................................................35
GPS-X Composite Variable Calculations ........................................................................................................................... 35
What is a Composite Variable? .......................................................................................................................................... 35
Stoichiometry Settings........................................................................................................................................................ 35
Stoichiometry Calculations ................................................................................................................................................ 35
Displaying Composite Variables ........................................................................................................................................ 61
CHAP T ER 5 .........................................................................................................63
Influent Models ..................................................................................................................................................................... 63
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ 63
Influent Advisor ................................................................................................................................................................. 63
Influent objects in CNLIB, CNPLIB, CN2LIB, CNIPLIB, CNPIPLIB, CN2IPLIB.......................................................... 66
Influent Appendices............................................................................................................................................................ 77
Influent objects in MANTIS2LIB ...................................................................................................................................... 86
CHAP T ER 6 .........................................................................................................95
Suspended-Growth Models .................................................................................................................................................. 95
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ 95
Common Features ............................................................................................................................................................... 95
Activated Sludge Biological Models ................................................................................................................................ 117
Activated Sludge Model No. 1 (ASM1) ........................................................................................................................... 119
Activated Sludge Model No. 2d (ASM2d) ....................................................................................................................... 121
Mantis Model (MANTIS)................................................................................................................................................. 125
Two-Step-Mantis model (TWOSTEPMANTIS) .............................................................................................................. 126
New General Model (NEWGENERAL) .......................................................................................................................... 126
Comprehensive Model (ManTIS2) ................................................................................................................................... 131
iv Table of Contents
Special Activated Sludge Units .......................................................................................................................................... 153

Deep Shaft Reactor ........................................................................................................................................................... 153
Membrane bioreactor (mbr).............................................................................................................................................. 153
Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR)..................................................................................................................................... 165
Pond/Lagoon .................................................................................................................................................................... 170
Oxidation Ditch ................................................................................................................................................................ 174
High Purity Oxygen (HPO) System ................................................................................................................................. 177
Open Basin HPO .............................................................................................................................................................. 178
Powdered Activated Carbon ............................................................................................................................................. 198
CHAPTER 7 ....................................................................................................... 201
Attached-Growth Models ................................................................................................................................................... 201
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 201
Trickling Filter Model ...................................................................................................................................................... 201
Rotating Biological Contactor (RBC) Model ................................................................................................................... 210
Submerged Biological Contactor (SBC) Model ............................................................................................................... 215
Biological Aerated Filter (BAF) Model ........................................................................................................................... 220
Hybrid-System.................................................................................................................................................................. 227
Denitrification filter .......................................................................................................................................................... 229
CHAPTER 8 ....................................................................................................... 231
Sedimentation and Flotation Models ................................................................................................................................ 231
Sedimentation Models ...................................................................................................................................................... 231
Types of Settlers/Clarifiers ............................................................................................................................................... 239
Flotation Model ................................................................................................................................................................ 240
CHAPTER 9 ....................................................................................................... 245
Sand Filtration Models ....................................................................................................................................................... 245
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 245
Continuous Model ............................................................................................................................................................ 245
Mass Balance Model ........................................................................................................................................................ 246
One-Dimensional Model .................................................................................................................................................. 247
CHAPTER 10 ..................................................................................................... 251
Digestion Models ................................................................................................................................................................. 251
Basic Anaerobic Digestion Model .................................................................................................................................... 251
Anaerobic Digestion Model #1 (ADM1) .......................................................................................................................... 262
Aerobic Digestion Model ................................................................................................................................................. 268
UASB/EGSB model ......................................................................................................................................................... 269
CHAPTER 11 ..................................................................................................... 273
Other Models....................................................................................................................................................................... 273
Splitters............................................................................................................................................................................. 273
Control Splitter ................................................................................................................................................................. 273
Pumping Station ............................................................................................................................................................... 274
Membrane Filter ............................................................................................................................................................... 275
Equalization Tank ............................................................................................................................................................. 275
Sludge PreTreatment ........................................................................................................................................................ 276
In-line Chemical Dosage .................................................................................................................................................. 277
Grit Chamber .................................................................................................................................................................... 284
Disinfection Unit .............................................................................................................................................................. 284
Dewatering ....................................................................................................................................................................... 285
Black Box ......................................................................................................................................................................... 286
Table of Contents v
CHAPTER 12 ..................................................................................................... 291

Tools Object ........................................................................................................................................................................ 291
Data Transfer .................................................................................................................................................................... 291
Sampler............................................................................................................................................................................. 291
PH Tool ............................................................................................................................................................................ 292
Low-Pass Filtering ........................................................................................................................................................... 296
On/Off Control ................................................................................................................................................................. 297
PID Control ...................................................................................................................................................................... 299
Feedforward-Feedback Controllers .................................................................................................................................. 305
Timer Control ................................................................................................................................................................... 307
Multivariable Controllers ................................................................................................................................................. 308
Flow Timer Model............................................................................................................................................................ 308
Scheduler Model............................................................................................................................................................... 310
CHAPTER 13 ..................................................................................................... 315
Operating Cost Models....................................................................................................................................................... 315
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 315
Model Structure ................................................................................................................................................................ 315
Operating Cost Model Parameters .................................................................................................................................... 317
Operating Cost Model Display Variables ......................................................................................................................... 319
Calibration of Operating Cost Models.............................................................................................................................. 321
Operating Costs for Each Object ...................................................................................................................................... 322
CHAPTER 14 ..................................................................................................... 325
Optimizer ............................................................................................................................................................................. 325
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 325
Optimizer Description ...................................................................................................................................................... 325
Objective Function Options .............................................................................................................................................. 327
Termination Criteria ......................................................................................................................................................... 328
Types of Optimization ...................................................................................................................................................... 330
Summary of the Optimizer Settings and Parameters ........................................................................................................ 334
Optimization Strategies .................................................................................................................................................... 339
Appendix A: Maximum Likelihood Method .................................................................................................................... 340
Appendix B: The Optimizer Solution Report ................................................................................................................... 345
Appendix C: Nomenclature .............................................................................................................................................. 358
Appendix D: References................................................................................................................................................... 360
CHAPTER 15 ..................................................................................................... 363
Miscellaneous ...................................................................................................................................................................... 363
Real Time Clock ............................................................................................................................................................... 363
Steady-State Solver .......................................................................................................................................................... 364
Numerical Control ............................................................................................................................................................ 366
Large Models .................................................................................................................................................................... 370
Integration Considerations ................................................................................................................................................ 370
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 4-1 - Diagram Nomenclature .......................................................................................................................................... 36

Figure 4-2 Carbon – Nitrogen Library (CNLIB): BOD, COD and Suspended Solids Composite Variables and their
Relationship to the State Variables ................................................................................................................... 37
Figure 4-3 Carbon – Nitrogen Library: Nitrogen Composite Variables and their Relationships to the State Variables. ......... 39
Figure 4-4 Carbon – Nitrogen – Phosphorus Library: BOD, COD and Suspended Solids Composite and their
relationship to the State Variables. ................................................................................................................... 42
vi Table of Contents
Figure 4-5 Carbon – Nitrogen Phosphorus Library: Nitrogen Composite Variables and their Relationships to the State
Variables ........................................................................................................................................................... 44
Figure 4-6 Carbon – Nitrogen – Phosphorus Library: Phosphorus Composite Variables and their Relationship
to the State Variables ..................................................................................................................................... 46
Figure 4-7 Advanced Carbon – Nitrogen Library: BOD, COD and Suspended Solids Composite Variables and their
Relationship to the State Variables ................................................................................................................... 50
Figure 4-8 Advanced Carbon – Nitrogen Library: Nitrogen Composite Variables and their Relation to the State
Variables ........................................................................................................................................................... 52
Figure 4-9 MANTIS2LIB – Calculation Procedure for Composite Variables SCOD, COD, SBOD, BOD, SBODu and
BODu ............................................................................................................................................................... 56
Figure 4-10 MANTIS2LIB – Calculation Procedure for Composite Variables VSS, TSS ...................................................... 57
Figure 4-11 MANTIS2LIB – Calculation Procedure for Composite Variables STKN and TKN ............................................ 58
Figure 4-12 MANTIS2LIB – Calculation Procedure for Composite Variables STP, XTP and TP .......................................... 59
Figure 4-13 MANTIS2LIB – Calculation Procedure for Composite Variables STOC and TOC............................................. 60
Figure 5-1 - Opening the Influent Advisor Tool ........................................................................................................................ 63
Figure 5-2 - Influent Advisor Menu .......................................................................................................................................... 64
Figure 5-3 Influent Advisor Screen Showing Highlighted Cells and Negative Values High-lighted in Red ............................ 65
Figure 5-4 - Selecting the Influent Flow Data Menu ................................................................................................................ 67
Figure 5-5 - Influent Flow Data Menu, showing Flow Type Options ...................................................................................... 67
Figure 5-6 - The Influent Models (left - Wastewater, right - Chemical Dosage)...................................................................... 69
Figure 5-7 - CN Library Bodbased Influent Model Inputs ........................................................................................................ 70
Figure 5-8 - CN Library Nutrient Fractions for the Influent Models ......................................................................................... 71
Figure 5-9 - CODstates Influent Model Inputs .......................................................................................................................... 72
Figure 5-10 CN Library States Influent Model Influent Stoichiometry Inputs .......................................................................... 73
Figure 5-11 CN Library tsscod Model Particulate Inert Calculation ......................................................................................... 74
Figure 5-12 CN Library tsscod Influent Soluble Components Calculation ............................................................................... 74
Figure 5-13 CN Library Acetate Influent Model – Acetate Dose Form .................................................................................... 75
Figure 5-14 CN Library Methanol Influent Model Inputs.................................................................................................... 76
Figure 5-15 - Batch Input Menu - Flow Data Model Inputs ...................................................................................................... 77
Figure 5-16 - CN Library Organic State and Composite Variables ........................................................................................... 79
Figure 5-17 - CN Library Nitrogen State and Composite Variables ................................................................................... 80
Figure 5-18 - CN2 Library Organic State and Composite Variables ......................................................................................... 81
Figure 5-19 - CN2 Library Nitrogen State and Composite Variables........................................................................................ 82
Figure 5-20 - CNP Library Organic State and Composite Variables......................................................................................... 84
Figure 5-21 - CNP Library Nitrogen State and Composite Variables ....................................................................................... 85
Figure 5-22 - CNP Library Phosphorus State and Composite Variables ................................................................................... 85
Figure 5-23 - Accessing the Stoichiometry Parameters in MANTIS2LIB ............................................................................... 87
Figure 5-24 - Influent Specific Stoichiometric Parameters ....................................................................................................... 88
Figure 5-25 - Fixed Stoichiometric Parameters in MANTIS2LIB ............................................................................................ 88
Figure 5-26 - More Fixed Stoichiometric Parameters in MANTIS2LIB ................................................................................... 88
Figure 5-27 - Models in COD Chemical Dosage Influent Object ............................................................................................. 89
Figure 5-28 - Accessing Feed Chemical Details Menu ............................................................................................................. 89
Figure 5-29 - Selection of Feed Chemical and Setup of Chemical Properties ................................................................... 90
Figure 5-30 - Models in Acid Dosage Influent Object .............................................................................................................. 90
Figure 5-32 - Selection of Feed Chemical and Setup of Chemical Properties ........................................................................... 91
Figure 5-33 Models in Alkali Dosage Influent Object .............................................................................................................. 91
Figure 5-36 - Models in Nutrient Dosage Influent Object ......................................................................................................... 93
Figure 6-1 Aeration Setup Form in Operational Form .................................................................................................. 108
Figure 6-2 - General Aeration Setup > More … Form ............................................................................................................ 108
Figure 6-3 - Diffused Aeration Setup > More … Form (Part 1) .............................................................................................. 109
Table of Contents vii
Figure 6-4 - Physical > More … Form Within an Object ........................................................................................................ 113
Figure 6-5 Physical Form (Layout-Wide Settings) ................................................................................................................ 115
Figure 6-6 - Blower Cost Form ............................................................................................................................................... 116
Figure 6-7 - ASM3 Model Processes ....................................................................................................................................... 125
Figure 6-8 - General Reaction Pathway. .................................................................................................................................. 146
Figure 6-9 - Schematic Diagram of the prefermenter Model ................................................................................................ 150
Figure 6-10 GPS-X Membrane Bioreactor Objects ................................................................................................................. 153
Figure 6-11 Membrane Bioreactor Model Structures .............................................................................................................. 154
Figure 6-12 - Physical - Membrane Forms .............................................................................................................................. 156
Figure 6-13 - Membrane Operational Parameters Menu ......................................................................................................... 161
Figure 6-14 - Membrane Display Variables Menu .................................................................................................................. 164
Figure 6-15 - MBR Cake Variables Menu............................................................................................................................... 164
Figure 6-16 - Regular SBR – Operational Cycle Parameters .................................................................................................. 166
Figure 6-17 - Advanced SBR Operational Parameters ............................................................................................................ 167
Figure 6-18 - Manual Cycle Operational Parameters .............................................................................................................. 169
Figure 6-19 - Oxidation Ditch Recirculation Mode Settings ................................................................................................... 175
Figure 6-20 - 2-D Greyscale Oxidation Ditch Output – Dissolved Oxygen ............................................................................ 176
Figure 6-21 - Schematic of High Purity Oxygen (HPO) System ............................................................................................. 177
Figure 17 variation of nitrifier kinetic parameter values with temperature ............................................................................. 196
Figure 6-24 - Toxic Inhibition Menu ....................................................................................................................................... 200
Figure 7-1 - Conceptual Diagram of the Trickling Filter Model ............................................................................................. 203
Figure 7-2 - Physical Dimensions of the Trickling Filter ........................................................................................................ 205
Figure 7-3 Integration of Soluble Components ................................................................................................................ 206
Figure 7-4 Integration....................................................................................................................................................... 206
Figure 7-5 Mass Transport Parameters............................................................................................................................. 207
Figure 7-6 Physical Dimensions of the Trickling Filter ................................................................................................... 208
Figure 7-7 Trickling Filter Display Variables .................................................................................................................. 209
Figure 7-8 2D Variables Outputs ..................................................................................................................................... 210
Figure 7-9 Conceptual Diagram of the RBC Model......................................................................................................... 211
Figure 7-10 Physical Dimensions of the RBC ................................................................................................................... 213
Figure 7-11 Physical Dimensions of the RBC ................................................................................................................... 214
Figure 7-12 Physical Dimension of the SBC ..................................................................................................................... 218
Figure 7-13 Physical Dimensions of the SBC (More…) .................................................................................................... 219
Figure 7-14 BAF Physical Parameters ............................................................................................................................... 224
Figure 7-15 BAF Operational Parameters .......................................................................................................................... 225
Figure 7-16 More BAF Operational Parameters ................................................................................................................ 226
Figure 7-17 Upflow and Downflow Denitrification Filter Objects .................................................................................... 229
Figure 8-1 One-Dimensional Sedimentation Model ........................................................................................................ 232
Figure 8-2 Solids Balance Around the Settler Layers ...................................................................................................... 233
Figure 8-3 Settling Velocity vs. Concentration ................................................................................................................ 235
Figure 8-4 Load Distributed into Settler .......................................................................................................................... 238
Figure 8-5 Circular Settler Shapes ................................................................................................................................... 239
Figure 8-6 Layered Flotation Model ................................................................................................................................ 241
Figure 8-7 Physical Parameters for the DAF Unit ........................................................................................................... 242
Figure 8-8 Operational Parameters for the DAF Unit ...................................................................................................... 243
Figure 8-9 Flotation Parameters for the DAF Unit........................................................................................................... 244
Figure 9-1 Operational Parameters Form – continuous Model ........................................................................................ 246
Figure 9-2 Operational Parameters Form – massbalance Model...................................................................................... 247
Figure 9-3 Filter Parameters ............................................................................................................................................. 249
Figure 10-1 Schematic Diagram of the Anaerobic Digestion Model ................................................................................. 252
Figure 10-2 General Reaction Pathway.............................................................................................................................. 253
Figure 10-3 Parameters Menu for the Anaerobic Digester ................................................................................................. 257
Figure 10-4 Physical Parameters ........................................................................................................................................ 258
Figure 10-5 Operational Parameters ................................................................................................................................... 259
Figure 10-6 Influent Parameters ......................................................................................................................................... 259
viii Table of Contents
Figure 10-7 Effluent Parameters ........................................................................................................................................ 259

Figure 10-8 pH Solver Set up ............................................................................................................................................. 260
Figure 10-9 Kinetic Parameters .......................................................................................................................................... 260
Figure 10-10 Stoichiometric Parameters .............................................................................................................................. 262
Figure 10-11 Simplified ADM1 Material Flow Diagram ....................................................................................................... 263
Figure 10-12 Method of Specifying the ADM1 Influent When the Influent Stream is Represented by an Influent
Object ............................................................................................................................................................. 264
Figure 10-13 Method of Specifying the ADM1 Influent When the Influent Stream is an Output Stream from Another
Object ............................................................................................................................................................. 265
Figure 10-14 Reactor parameters for UASB/EGSB reactor .................................................................................................... 269
Figure 10-15 Reactor Parameters Input form .......................................................................................................................... 270
Figure 11-1 Pumping Station Menu....................................................................................................................................... 274
Figure 11-2 Removal as a Function of P Concentration ......................................................................................................... 278
Figure 11-3 Dosage Controller Parameters............................................................................................................................. 280
Figure 11-4 Curve showing relationship between the soluble components concentration and required metal dose for
unit soluble component removal..................................................................................................................... 283
Figure 11-5 Typical Regression Equation .......................................................................................................................... 287
Figure 11-6 Specifying the outgoing state variable in the interchange model ...................................................................... 288
Figure 11-7 Custom interchange macro ............................................................................................................................ 289
Figure 12-1 pH Model Set up Menu ....................................................................................................................................... 292
Figure 12-2 Component Control Form ............................................................................................................................... 294
Figure 12-3 Sample pH Outputs ......................................................................................................................................... 296
Figure 12-4 Signal Flow Diagram for the Lowpass Model ................................................................................................ 297
Figure 12-5 Selecting the Flow Timer Model......................................................................................................................... 309
Figure 12-6 Flow Timer Menu ............................................................................................................................................... 309
Figure 12-7 Selecting the Scheduler Model............................................................................................................................ 310
Figure 12-8 Input form for the “scheduler” model ................................................................................................................. 312
Figure 12-9 Input form for setting duration of each phase ..................................................................................................... 312
Figure 12-10 Input form for setting the value of a control variable in each phase of a sequence ........................................... 313
Figure 13-1 General Data Operating Cost Data ................................................................................................................. 318
Figure 13-2 Operating Cost Menu .......................................................................................................................................... 319
Figure 13-3 Layout Operating Cost Display Form (total for all objects) ........................................................................... 320
Figure 13-4 Object-Specific Operating Cost Display Form ............................................................................................... 321
Figure 14-1 Form Containing the Simplex Method Constants ........................................................................................... 326
Figure 14-2 Optimizer Form Containing the Termination Criteria Settings ...................................................................... 330
Figure 14-3 Example GPS-X Output Graph Showing Measured Data (+ Markers) and the Predicted Response
(Continuous Line) ........................................................................................................................................... 332
Figure 14-4 Bottom of the Optimizer Form ....................................................................................................................... 334
Figure 15-1 Real Time Clock Parameters .......................................................................................................................... 364
Figure 15-2 Steady-State Parameters ................................................................................................................................. 365
Figure 15-3 More Steady-State Parameters ........................................................................................................................ 365
Figure 15-4 Integration Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 367
Figure 15-5 Numerical Parameters Form ........................................................................................................................... 368
Figure 15-6 Smoothing Function ....................................................................................................................................... 370
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3-1 - Carbon – Nitrogen Library (CNLIB) State Variables ............................................................................................. 26

Table 3-2 - Industrial Pollutant (CNIPLIB) Library State Variables ......................................................................................... 27
Table 3-3 - Carbon – Nitrogen – Phosphorus (CNPLIB) Library State Variables .................................................................... 28
Table 3-4 - CNPIPLIB Library State Variables ......................................................................................................................... 29
Table 3-5 - Advanced Carbon – Nitrogen (CN2LIB) Library State Variables .......................................................................... 30
Table 3-6 - Advanced Industrial Pollutant (CN2IPLIB) Library State Variables ...................................................................... 31
Table 3-7 - Comprehensive Model Library (MANTIS2LIB) State Variables ........................................................................... 32
Table 4-1 - Example Composite Variable Calculations............................................................................................................. 36
Table of Contents ix
Table 4-2 - CNLIB BOD, COD and TSS Composite Variables (All Models) .......................................................................... 38
Table 4-3 - CNLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – MANTIS Model .................................................................................... 40
Table 4-4 - CNLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – ASM1 Model ......................................................................................... 40
Table 4-5 - CNLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – ASM3 Model ......................................................................................... 40
Table 4-6 - CNPLIB BOD, COD and TSS and Composite Variables ....................................................................................... 43
Table 4-7 - CNPLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – MANTIS Model .................................................................................. 44
Table 4-8 - CNPLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – ASM1 Model ....................................................................................... 45
Table 4-9 - CNPLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – ASM2d Model ..................................................................................... 45
Table 4-10 - CNPLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – ASM3 Model .................................................................................... 45
Table 4-11 - CNPLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – NEWGENERAL model .................................................................... 46
Table 4-12 - CNPLIB Phosphorus Composite Variables – ASM1/MANTIS models ............................................................... 47
Table 4-13 - CNPLIB Phosphorus Composite Variables – ASM3 Model ................................................................................ 47
Table 4-14 - CNPLIB Phosphorus Composite Variables – ASM2d Model .............................................................................. 47
Table 4-15 - CNPLIB Phosphorus Composite Variables – NEWGENERAL Model ............................................................... 48
Table 4-16 - CN2LIB BOD, COD and TSS and Comp. Var. – MANTIS Model ..................................................................... 49
Table 4-17 - CN2LIB BOD, COD and TSS and Comp. Var. – TWOSTEPMANTIS Model ................................................... 49
Table 4-18 - CN2LIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – MANTIS Model ................................................................................ 51
Table 4-19 - CN2LIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – TWOSTEPMANTIS Model .............................................................. 51
Table 4-20 - Stoichiometry parameters used in estimation of BOD and BODU ........................................................................ 53
Table 4-21 Access Menus for Different Stoichiometry Parameters in MANTIS2LIB .............................................................. 55
Table 5-1 - State Variables Used in Each Biological Model Included in CNLIB and CNIPLIB ..................................... 78
Table 5-2 State Variables Used in Each Biological Model Included in CN2LIB and CN2IPLIB..................................... 80
Table 5-3 State Variables Used in Each Biological Model included in CNPLIB and CNPIPLIB ............................................ 82
Table 5-4 - Influent Objects in MANTIS2LIB .......................................................................................................................... 86
Table 5-5 - Alkali Chemicals and Affected States in the Feed .................................................................................................. 92
Table 5-6 Nutrient Chemicals and Affected States in the Feed ................................................................................................. 93
Table 6-1 Example Model Matrix (Wentzel et al., 1987a) .......................................................................................... 118
Table 6-2 - Model processes in GPS-X ................................................................................................................................... 152
Table 6-3 - MBR Model Modes .............................................................................................................................................. 155
Table 6-4– GPS-XTM MBR Model - Default Parameter Values .............................................................................................. 163
Table 6-5 - Calibration Suggestions ........................................................................................................................................ 173
Table 6-6 - Library-specific Algorithms for Empiric Pond Model .......................................................................................... 174
Table 18 Heat transfer terms with equations for estimation .................................................................................................... 197
Table 19 Parameters for the temperature model ...................................................................................................................... 197
Table 8-1 Sedimentation Model: Input-Output Summary ............................................................................................. 233
Table 11-1 Chemeq Parameters .............................................................................................................................................. 279
Table 13-1 Operating Costs Applied to Each Object/Model ............................................................................................ 322
Table 14-1 Summary of How to Use the Statistical Tests ................................................................................................ 358
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: PETERSEN MATRICES ............................................................................................................................ A-1
APPENDIX C: RESPIROMETRY ....................................................................................................................................... B-1
APPENDIX D: REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................ C-1
Modelling Fundamentals 11
CHAPTER 1
Modelling Fundamentals
Introduction to Modelling and Simulation

The purpose of this chapter is to provide a basic introduction to modelling and
simulation. This chapter will serve to establish the basic definitions for terms that will be
used throughout the technical reference. In addition, emphasis will be placed on the
advantages of simulation.
When speaking about modelling and simulation, the following terms are often used:
• System
• Experiment
• Model
• Simulation
These terms are discussed next.
SYSTEM
In a general sense, the notion of a system may be defined as a collection of
A system is a set of
interdependent
various structural and non-structural elements which are interconnected and
components that are organized to achieve some specified objective by the control and distribution of
united to perform a material resources, energy and information (Smith et al., 1983).
specified function.
One of the basic aspects of a system is that it can be controlled and observed.
Its interactions with the environment fall into two categories:
1. Variables generated by the environment that influence the behaviour of the

system (called inputs).
2. Variables that are determined by the system that in turn influence the
behaviour of the environment (called outputs).

12 Modelling Fundamentals
Accordingly, a system is a potential source of data in that inputs can be defined

and observation of the behaviour of the system can be made.
EXPERIMENT
An experiment is the process of extracting data from a system through the
manipulations of the inputs.
Experimentation is probably the single most important concept of a system for

it is through experimentation that we develop a better understanding of it.
Experimentation implies that two basic properties of a system are being used:
1. Controllability, and
2. Observability.
To perform an experiment implies the application of a set of external

conditions to the inputs of a system (i.e. the accessible inputs) and observe the
reaction of the system by recording the behaviour of the outputs (i.e. the
accessible outputs). This is where some of the advantages of a system begin to
appear. One of the major advantages of experimenting with a "simulated"
system as opposed to the "actual" or "real" system, is that real systems are
usually under the influence of a large number of additional inaccessible inputs
(i.e., disturbances) and that a number of useful outputs may not be available
through measurement (i.e., they are internal states of the system).
One of the major motivations for simulation is that in the simulation world, all
inputs and all outputs are accessible. This allows the execution of simulations
that lie outside of the range of experiments that are applicable to the real
system.
MODEL
One definition of a model is: a model is an approximation of a system to which
A model is an
abstraction of a
an experiment can be applied to answer questions about the system. A model
system. does not imply a computer program. We should be clear to distinguish between
a model and a computer program. A model could be a piece of hardware or
simply an understanding of how a system works. Models are often coded into
computer programs.
Why is modelling important?

Modelling means the process of organizing knowledge about a given system.
By performing experiments, knowledge about a system is gathered. In the
beginning the knowledge is unstructured. By understanding the cause and
effect relationships and by placing observation in both a temporal and spatial

order, the knowledge gathered during the experiment is organized. Thus, the
system is better understood by the process of modelling.
SIMULATION
Again, many definitions exist for the term simulation; however, one of the
Simulation is to a
model what simplest is: a simulation is an experiment performed on a model. Again, this
experimentation is does not imply that the simulation is performed on a computer. However, the
to a system. vast majority of engineering simulations are performed using a computer
program. A mathematical simulation is a coded description of an experiment
with a reference point to the model to which this experiment is to be applied.
The goal is to be able to experiment with models as easily and conveniently as
with real systems. It is desired to be able to use the simulation tools as easily as
a control chart in the operation of a facility.
While the scientist is normally happy to observe and understand the world, that
is creating a model of the world, the engineer (applied scientist) wants to
modify it to his/her advantage. While science is analysis, the essence of
engineering is control and design. Thus, simulation can be used for analysis
and for design.
Why is simulation important?

Except by experimenting with the real system, simulation is the only technique
available for the analysis of arbitrary system behaviour. The typical scenario of
scientific discovery is as follows:
1. Perform an experiment on the real system and extract data to gather

knowledge (understanding of the cause and effect relationship of the
real world).
2. Postulate a number of hypotheses related to the data.
3. Simplify the problem to help make the analysis tractable.
4. Perform a number of simulations with different experimental
parameters to verify that the simplifying assumptions are justified.
5. Analyze the system, verify the hypotheses and draw conclusions.
6. Simulations are performed to draw conclusions.
Simulation Tools
A wide variety of simulation tools are available to help you in this task.
Because the reader is assumed to be particularly interested in the dynamic
modelling of wastewater treatment, the tools appropriate for this task are
emphasized.

The process of dynamic modelling of facilities involves the solution of

thousands of coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations. The
formulation and solution of this type of problem is facilitated through the use
of Continuous Simulation Languages (CSL). CSLs date back to the late 1960s
when IBM introduced the language called CSMP (Continuous System
Modelling Program). Of the number of very specialized simulation languages
that are available, GPS-X uses ACSL for conducting simulations.
BENEFITS OF COMPUTER MODELLING

Computer models assist in developing a thorough understanding of the
behaviour of a system and in evaluating various system operating strategies. A
proposed system can be evaluated without building it. A costly or unsafe
system can be experimented with by using a model rather than disturbing the
real system.
Why COD is Important to Know

One of the most important ways to check the operation of a wastewater treatment plant,
the consistency of the analytical procedures and the integrity of the mathematical model
is to perform mass balances around the system for the different compounds. This task is
not always simple as components transform into other substances, bacterial cells grow,
respire and decay.
With regard to the organic substances, a commonly measurable parameter is the

Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD). We could measure organic carbon as Total Organic
Carbon (TOC) in the plant, but we would miss the fraction which was removed in the
form of CO2 gas after oxidation. It is difficult to determine the oxygen requirement based
on TOC, as different substances require different amounts of oxygen depending on their
chemical composition. The influent wastewater is truly a non-homogenous mixture in this
respect.
We could measure the 5-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD5) and suspended solids
as most plants in North America do. Suspended solids have the same problem as TOC
with respect to oxidation. BOD5 seems to give relevant information, but it is
inappropriate for continuous monitoring, and the accuracy of the results is not
comparable to other analytical methods. BOD5 measures only the part of organics which
were used for respiration in the BOD test during 5 days, and does not give information
about the amount converted into bacterial cells. Ultimate BOD (BODu) corrects this
problem but the analytical time and sometimes the accuracy is unacceptable. The BOD
test completely ignores a very important fraction of the influent wastewater (inert
particulates), which contributes in a major way to excess sludge production.
COD overcomes the above-mentioned problems. It can be automated and measures all
organic fractions of the wastewater. The sludge COD can also be easily determined. COD
measures all organics in oxygen equivalent; that is the electron donating capacity of the

organic matter. This way it provides a direct link between organic load and aeration
requirement. The yield constant is truly constant only if expressed in COD units. Mass
balance is easy to establish with COD in a non-nitrifying plant: in steady-state, the
influent COD must equal the effluent COD plus the COD of the wasted sludge, plus the
oxygen consumed in the degradation of organic matter.
It is for this reason that the International Association on Water Quality (IAWQ)
committee selected and endorses the use of COD as a measure of organic parameter in
simulation of activated sludge plants.
Data Requirements
For modelling purposes, each unit process/operation is represented by a process model
(mathematical model) that reflects the dynamic behaviour of that particular process. One
of the main features of GPS-X is that it is model-independent, meaning that GPS-X is not
limited to a specific process model. Accordingly, a variety of modelling approaches
(process models) are available within GPS-X to handle a specific unit operation or unit
process. For example, the activated sludge process can be modelled using any one of the
following GPS-X activated sludge process models:
• IAWQ Task Group models of the activated sludge process (Henze et al., 1987a;
Henze et al., 1994; Henze et al., 1998)
• The general (bio-P) model (Dold, 1990, Barker and Dold, 1997)
• Extended IAWQ (Mantis), (described in Chapter 6 of this document)
• Comprehensive model (Mantis2)
Consequently, a general calibration/verification approach to GPS-X must be broadly

defined. The calibration requirements of individual process models are established based
on the nature of each model (i.e., its mechanistic basis). Alternatively, modellers may
need to refer to the original literature reference to assess the calibration requirements of a
particular model in more detail.
Each calibration/verification study follows the same general principles. Accordingly, the
purpose of this section is to provide some guidelines pertaining to the calibration of the
models to full-scale wastewater treatment plants. The most popular process models have
been selected for illustration purposes, including the IAWQ Task Group Activated
Sludge Model No. 1 (Henze et al., 1987a) and layered settler model developed by
Hydromantis (Takács et al., 1991).
OVERVIEW OF DATA REQUIREMENTS

In general, modelling of large-scale wastewater treatment plants requires that
an extensive number of plant and model parameters be assessed. Many
parameters can be measured directly, while others are based on experimental
data taken from the literature. Those parameters that cannot be measured

directly or estimated from the literature are usually determined using nonlinear
dynamic optimization techniques based on actual plant records and/or
experimental data collected at the plant or in the lab. It is recognized that the
reliability of the calibrated model degrades with increasing numbers of
mathematically optimized parameters.
Data requirements fall in one of the following categories:
1. Physical plant data, including: process flow sheet (flow lines,

channels, recycle lines, by-passes, etc.); flow pattern (plug flow,
Continuously Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR), etc.); sludge collection
and withdrawal details (location, how, when, etc.); dimensions of the
various reactors (length, width, depth).
2. Operational plant data, including: flow, control variables (independent
variables) and response variables (dependent variables).
3. Influent wastewater characteristics, including: basic water quality
parameters; influent organic fractions; and influent nitrogen fractions.
4. Kinetic and stoichiometric model parameters for organic, nitrogenous
and phosphoric compounds and settling parameters (primary and
secondary).
5. Some of these data and/or parameters vary in the course of a day (e.g.,
subject to dry-weather diurnal variations or during a storm event),
while others remain relatively constant.
PHYSICAL PLANT DATA

Elements of this data group are generally easy to obtain from plant blueprints
and operation manuals. It should be remembered that the physical volume of a
reactor is only an approximation of the active or operational volume of the unit.
In a well-designed system the effect of dead-space and hydraulic short-
circuiting is normally minimal. In other cases it may be necessary to determine
the true hydraulic characteristics of a particular unit process, as in the case of a
quasi-plug flow aeration tank. In this case, a dye-test is normally required, as
the number of CSTRs becomes a model parameter.
System Configuration
The General Purpose Simulator can handle practically any flow scheme. Based
on our experience it is very important to identify as closely as possible the
hydraulic characteristics of a plant, including plant by-passes, overflows, flow
splits and combiners, proportional, constant or SRT driven sludge wastage, etc.
Parallel trains, multiple units and plug flow systems are easily simulated, but
should be simplified where possible (unless the required supporting data
required for calibration is available).

OPERATIONAL PLANT DATA

Flow Control Variables (Independent Variables)
Flow control variables refer to the following flow streams: influent flow,
sludge recycle flow, sludge wastage rate, plant by-pass, flow splits, and air
flow.
This is an important data group. For example, if the aeration capacity is not
known (or cannot be estimated from the aerator power or other means), then
the correct dissolved oxygen (DO) level can be set by either changing the KLa
or some stoichiometric or kinetic parameters (yield coefficient, growth rate,
etc.). This makes the correct estimation of those parameters difficult. Similarly,
model parameters having a strong effect on the aeration tank Mixed Liquor
Suspended Solids (MLSS) are difficult to estimate when the wastage rate is not
known.
Activated Sludge Response Variables

MLSS, Volatile Suspended Solids (VSS), COD of the mixed liquor, DO, and
Oxygen Uptake Rate (OUR) are required to calibrate the activated sludge
portion of the model. Refer to above section (p. 22) for a discussion on the
importance of COD for this chapter (Why COD is Important to Know). In
general, the stoichiometry of the mixed liquor (% VSS and COD/MLSS) is
relatively constant over time and can be assessed occasionally during the
course of a calibration/verification study, e.g., on a monthly or bi-weekly basis.
However, the other parameters are generally dynamic, following the diurnal
patterns of the plant.
It is important to be able to perform a solids mass balance around the system.

Accordingly, the sludge blanket height (and preferably the solids concentration
profile) and underflow solids concentration are required to calibrate the settler
portion of the model.
Primary and Final Effluent Response Variables

Water quality constituents such as BOD5 (inhibited), Total Suspended Solids
(TSS), Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN), ammonia (NH3) and nitrates (NO3) are
necessary for the calibration of the various unit processes. For example, BOD
(in lack of COD) is used to calibrate and verify the carbonaceous component of
the IAWQ activated sludge model, while suspended solids measurements can
be useful in identifying the settling parameters of Hydromantis' layered settler
model. The nitrogenous compounds are needed to calibrate the nitrification-
denitrification component of the model.

INFLUENT WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS

Basic Parameters
Basic influent wastewater characteristics such as BOD5, BODu, COD, TSS,
VSS, and TKN are important to know in that they allow us to establish mass
balances across the system. The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) provides
only partial information on the influent organic load (see Why COD is
Important to Know). COD measurements are not readily available in some
wastewater treatment plants. In this case, the BOD5/BODu ratio can better
estimate the influent organic load. Suspended solids, influent VSS and BOD
together, can be used to determine the different influent organic fractions,
which are critical for the proper use of the IAWQ activated sludge model, as
discussed in GPS-X Objects. Influent TKN is generally more useful than
ammonia concentration alone.
BIOLOGICAL REACTOR AND FINAL SETTLER

Organic Compounds
The IAWQ activated sludge model contains a large number of stoichiometric
and kinetic parameters, which describe the degradation of organic matter in the
activated sludge process (Henze et al., 1987a). Some of the analytical tests are
laborious and are not discussed here. Many of the default model parameters can
be used with a high degree of confidence. Site-specific model parameters
include the maximum growth rate and the yield coefficient of the heterotrophs.
If the data described in the previous sections are known (e.g., sludge wastage
rate and wastewater influent fractions), it is relatively easy to optimize the
maximum growth rate and yield coefficient of the heterotrophs to match the
measured MLSS, sludge production, and oxygen uptake rate.
Nitrogenous Compounds
Based on our experience, the most important parameter to calibrate in the
IAWQ model is the autotrophic growth rate. It is possible to calibrate this
parameter using field ammonia and nitrate data, if:
1. The plant is not overloaded, i.e., the plant is at least partially nitrifying;
or
2. The plant is not seriously under loaded. In such a case, almost any
value of the growth rate constant (typically between 0.2-0.5 d-1) will
provide complete nitrification.
The autotrophic growth rate is easier to identify in a partially nitrifying plant.
Process start-up data (i.e., corresponding to a slowly developing nitrifier
population) can sometimes be used. Laboratory testing (oxidation of an
ammonia spike) is also a possibility.

Settling Characteristics (Primary and Secondary)

The settling velocity function in Hydromantis' layered settler model contains
five parameters, which have to be determined separately for the primary and
the secondary clarifiers. A preliminary version of the model is described in
detail elsewhere (Takács et al., 1991). The model is based on the use of a
unified settling velocity equation described in the chapter on sedimentation and
flotation models. The parameters of the settling velocity equation can be
estimated from a combination of experimental and numerical procedures.
A short summary of the proposed experimental procedures is given below for

each parameter:
Minimum solids attainable. In general, this parameter for final settlers is

usually less than 10 mg/L. For most plants, xmin will be close to zero. A
sludge sample is allowed to settle for about two hours. The suspended solids
concentration of the supernatant is measured and equated to xmin.
Alternatively, xmin can be said to be equal to the suspended solids
concentration taken from the final settler under dry-weather flow conditions,
when the hydraulic load to the plant is minimal.
Maximum floc settling velocity parameter. Dilute the activated sludge to 1-2
g/L, measure the settling velocity of large individual floc particles in a batch
test. In general, no floc particle will settle faster than the settling velocity of
individual floc particles under quiescent conditions.
Vesilind zone settling parameters. These two parameters give the settling
velocity of the sludge in the hindered settling zone (exponential portion of the
curve). They can be determined through a series of column tests (Vesilind,
1968).
Flocculant settling parameter. If all the above settling parameters are known,
then this one is generally easy to estimate by fitting the simulated effluent
suspended solids simulations to observed data.
Alternatively, settling velocity model parameters can be estimated using a

time-series of influent and effluent (overflow and underflow) suspended solids.
The non-linear parameter optimization procedure available in GPS-X can be
used effectively in this particular case.
A TYPICAL CALIBRATION EVENT

In an ideal case all the physical, operational and influent parameters are known
for the given wastewater treatment plant, while some of the most important
kinetic, stoichiometric and settling parameters are experimentally determined.
In such a case the modeller estimates the missing parameters using defaults at

the beginning, then modifying those which need adjustment and observing the
response of several system output variables.
It is possible to start with a steady-state calibration, e.g., taking the dry weather
days from a daily log of the treatment plant and optimizing for the average of
these values. Averages, which contain high flow periods (typical monthly or
yearly averages), should not be used for steady-state calibration.
Dynamic calibration should follow with typical diurnal data or selected high
disturbance (storm flow) events. The larger the scale of the disturbance
between reasonable limits, the more sensitive the calibration procedure will be.
Hydraulic shocks are usually ideal for settler calibrations, while diurnal data,
process start-up, or recovery is better for calibration of organic degradation and
nitrification.
One fully documented event gives reasonable confidence for the given
conditions (flow, temperature, influent composition, etc.). If the model is to be
used under varying conditions, the above procedure has to be repeated
accordingly (e.g., winter, summer, dry weather, wet weather, etc.). Verification
means simulating a dynamic event with a given calibrated set of parameters,
without modifying those, and finding reasonable accordance of simulated data
with the measurements.
A few or several may be missing from the physical, operational and influent
group. This does not make calibration/verification impossible, as the
interdependencies in a treatment plant are complex and default values are
relatively well known. Reasonable estimation of unknown parameters is
sometimes possible. In the case of underflows, the solids mass distribution
between the aeration tank and the settler depends largely on the recycle flow.
Knowing aeration tank MLSS and underflow concentration (maybe sludge
blanket height), the missing value can be recreated by numerically fitting these
variables as a function of the underflow. However, with increasing number of
such optimized parameters the confidence in the predictions of the model
erodes.

GPS-X Objects 21
CHAPTER 2
GPS-X Objects
What is an Object?
An Object refers to the icon, which appears on the GPS-X Drawing Board when selected
from the Process Table. An object is a symbolic representation of a unit process without
any process model associated. There are several items associated with the object:
1. The hydraulic configuration;
2. Physical attributes;
3. Operational attributes;
4. Display variables;
5. Stream labels; and
6. Sources.
The hydraulic configuration refers to the number of connection points on an object and
the operation of these connection points; that is, whether the connection point is incoming
or outgoing. The parameters and stream labels are under the Parameters sub-menu and
Labels... sub-menu respectively. Additional sub-menu items are found under the
Parameters menu, which are process model and library specific. The Display Variables menu
item is used to select model variables for display on a graph, while the Sources menu item
displays the object number that acts as a source for some of the Parameters.
Not all menus are active. For example, until the model is chosen for an object, the
Parameters and Initialization menus (if they exist for the object) are not active and appear
greyed out. Once the model as been specified, these menus will become active.
Types of Objects
COMMON PROPERTIES
Before describing each object that appears on the GPS-X Process Table, an
outline of the properties common to some objects is presented. The objects in

22 GPS-X Objects
the Process Table can be described as either having volume or not. There are
some deviations from this general rule, but they can be ignored for now. For
example the control splitter object does not have any volume (called zero
volume), while the equalization basin does have volume. The zero volume
objects do not have any dilution or residence time while the objects with
volume do.
Objects with volume have one or more influent connection points and one or
more effluent connection points. For example, the settler objects have one
influent connection point plus three effluent connection points, while the PLUG
FLOW-TANK(2) object has three influent connection points and two effluent
connection points. The effluent connection point(s) will have an overflow
connection plus one or more pump connections. The overflow is located at the
upper right hand corner of the object (as oriented in the Process Table), while
any additional output connections are located on the right hand side or bottom
of the object. The additional output connections (either called pump or
underflow) simulate a constant or variable flow pump so that a flow rate can be
specified (up to the maximum pump capacity).
The volume of fluid in the tank depends on the net influent - effluent flow. If
this is a negative value, then the volume of the tank will decrease until it
reaches zero. At this point the effluent will equal the influent, regardless of the
pump flow set. If the net influent-effluent flow is positive, the tank volume will
increase until the maximum (specified by the user). At this point, the tank
begins to overflow, so that the effluent flow (sum of the overflow and pump
flows) will be equal to the influent flow. The effluent flow over and above the
effluent pumped flow rates will leave through the overflow connection point. If
the net influent-effluent flow is zero, then the volume will not change.
The mass balance for variable volume tanks is shown in Equations 2.1-2.4:
d (C ⋅ V ) ∂C ∂V
QinCin − Qout C + r = =V ⋅ +C
dt ∂t dt (2.1)
∂V
= Qin − Qout (2.2)
∂t
Qin (Cin − C ) + r = V
dC
dt (2.3)
Qin
(Cin − C ) + r = dC (2.4)
V V dt

GPS-X Objects 23
where:
Qin = influent flow rate (m3/d)

Qout = effluent flow rate (m3/d)
Cin = influent concentration (mg/L)
C = effluent concentration (mg/L)
r = rate of reaction (mg/L/d)
V = liquid volume (m3)
t = time (d)
Another feature to the objects with volume is their initial volume. When a
simulation begins, the user can specify what volume the tank initially has
through the use of a logical variable called start with full tank, located under
Initial Conditions > Initial volume. If this logical switch is true, then the tank will be
full at the beginning of the simulation. If this logical variable is false, then the
user can specify the initial reactor volume at the start of the simulation. As a
consequence of this, the user can specify the starting volume as full by two
ways:
1. Either setting the logical variable true; or

2. By setting the variable false and specifying manually the starting
volume equal to the maximum tank volume.
The advantage of using the logical switch is that if the user changes the
physical size of the object, the start volume will still be full so that the initial
volume does not have to be specified separately. By default, the start with full
tank variable is true.
From Equation 2.1, the concentration of a conservative material in objects with

volume, relative to its influent concentration, can be calculated as shown in the
following equations.
dX Qin Q
= ⋅ X in − out ⋅ X OUT (2.5)
dt V V
where:
X = conservative component concentration (g/m3)

Q = flow rate (m3/d)
t = time (d)
Qin = influent stream
Qout = effluent stream
Xout = effluent concentration (g/m3)

24 GPS-X Objects
At steady-state, the time derivatives are zero and equation 2.5 becomes:
Qin ⋅ X in = Qout ⋅ X out (2.6)
If the SRT is defined as:
SRT = (V ⋅ X ) / (Qout ⋅ X w ) (2.7)
where:
SRT = solids retention time (d)

V = volume (m3)
Combining equation 2.6 and equation 2.7 gives:
Qin ⋅ X in = V ⋅ X / (SRT ) (2.8)
The hydraulic residence time (HRT) is defined as:
HRT = V / Qin (2.9)
Combining equation 2.8 and equation 2.9 gives:
X / X in = SRT / HRT (2.10)
This equation shows the ratio of the concentration of the conservative

component in the object to its concentration in the influent. At steady-state, it is
directly proportional to the SRT/HRT value.

GPS-X State Variable Libraries 25
CHAPTER 3
GPS-X State Variable Libraries
What is a Library?
A library in GPS-X is a collection of wastewater process models using a set of basic
wastewater components, or state variables. The term state variable refers to the basic
variables that are continuously integrated over time. The composite variables are those
variables that are calculated from (or composed of) the state variables. In discussing the
state variables for the different libraries listed below, volume is not explicitly stated as a
state variable as it is common to all libraries. The relationships presented in this chapter
between the state and composite variables are used in every connection point of the plant
layout.
Please Note: In GPS-X, BOD refers to the carbonaceous BOD5 (CBOD) unless otherwise
stated. This is to distinguish the oxygen demand for organic carbon removal from the
oxygen demand for ammonia oxidation. The values of these two analyses for the same
sample can be considerably different.
Types of Libraries
Seven libraries are available for GPS-X:
• Carbon - Nitrogen (CNLIB)

• Carbon - Nitrogen - Industrial Pollutant (CNIPLIB)
• Carbon - Nitrogen - Phosphorus (CNPLIB)
• Carbon - Nitrogen - Phosphorus - Industrial Pollutant (CNPIPLIB)
• Advanced - Carbon - Nitrogen (CN2LIB)
• Advanced - Carbon - Nitrogen - Industrial Pollutant (CN2IPLIB)
• Comprehensive – Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, pH (MANTIS2LIB)
The state variables used in the libraries are listed in the appropriate section below.

26 GPS-X State Variable Libraries
Carbon - Nitrogen Library (CNLIB)
STATE VARIABLES
Sixteen (16) state variables are available in the Carbon - Nitrogen library (Table 3-1).
Table 3-1 - Carbon – Nitrogen Library (CNLIB) State Variables

State Variables GPS-X Cryptic Symbols Units
1 Soluble inert organics si gCOD/m3
2 Readily biodegradable (soluble) substrate ss gCOD/m3
3 Particulate inert organics xi gCOD/m3
4 Slowly biodegr. (stored, particulate) substrate xs gCOD/m3
5 Active heterotrophic biomass xbh gCOD/m3
6 Active autotrophic biomass xba gCOD/m3
7 Unbiodegradable particulates from cell decay xu gCOD/m3
8 Cell internal storage product xsto gCOD/m3
9 Dissolved oxygen so gN/m3
10 Nitrate and nitrite N sno gN/m3
11 Free and ionized ammonia snh gN/m3
12 Soluble biodegradable organic nitrogen (in ss) snd gN/m3
13 Particulate biodegr. organic nitrogen (in xs) xnd gN/m3
14 Dinitrogen snn gN/m3
15 Alkalinity salk mole/m3
16 Inert inorganic suspended solids xii g/m3
Industrial Pollutant Library (CNIPLIB)
STATE VARIABLES
Forty-six (46) state variables are available in the Industrial Pollutant library.
Sixteen (16) are pre-defined and thirty (30) are user-definable (15 soluble, 15
particulate). They are listed in Table 3-2.

Table 3-2 - Industrial Pollutant (CNIPLIB) Library State Variables

9 Dissolved oxygen so gO2/m3
13 Particulate biodegradable organic nitrogen (in xs) xnd gN/m3
17 Soluble component "a" sza notset
18 Soluble component "b" szb notset
19 Soluble component "c" szc notset
20 Soluble component "d" szd notset
21 Soluble component "e" sze notset
22 Soluble component "f" szf notset
23 Soluble component "g" szg notset
24 Soluble component "h" szh notset
25 Soluble component "i" szi notset
26 Soluble component "j" szj notset
27 Soluble component "k" szk notset
28 Soluble component "l" szl notset
29 Soluble component "m" szm notset
30 Soluble component "n" szn notset
31 Soluble component "o" szo notset
32 Particulate component "a" xza notset
33 Particulate component "b" xzb notset
34 Particulate component "c" xzc notset
35 Particulate component "d" xzd notset
36 Particulate component "e" xze notset
37 Particulate component "f" xzf notset
38 Particulate component "g" xzg notset
39 Particulate component "h" xzh notset
40 Particulate component "i" xzi notset
41 Particulate component "j" xzj notset
42 Particulate component "k" xzk notset
43 Particulate component "l" xzl notset
44 Particulate component "m" xzm notset
45 Particulate component "n" xzn notset
46 Particulate component "o" xzo notset

Carbon - Nitrogen - Phosphorus Library (CNPLIB)
STATE VARIABLES
Twenty-seven (27) state variables are available in the Carbon - Nitrogen -
Phosphorus library (Table 3-3).
Table 3-3 - Carbon – Nitrogen – Phosphorus (CNPLIB) Library State Variables

13 Polyphosphate accumulating biomass xbp gCOD/m3
14 Poly-hydroxy-alkanoates (PHA) xbt gCOD/m3
15 Stored polyphosphate xpp gP/m3
16 Volatile fatty acids slf gCOD/m3
17 Soluble phosphorus sp gP/m3
20 Soluble unbiodegradable organic nitrogen (in si) sni gN/m3
21 Fermentable readily biodegradable substrate sf gCOD/m3
22 Stored glycogen xgly gCOD/m3
23 Stored polyphosphate (releasable) xppr gP/m3
24 Metal-hydroxides xmeoh g/m3
25 Metal-phosphate xmep g/m3
CNP Industrial Pollutant Library (CNPIPLIB)
STATE VARIABLES
Fifty-seven (57) state variables are available in the CNP Industrial Pollutant
library (CNPIPLIB). These include the 27 state variables from CNPLIB, as
well as 30 user-definable variables (15 soluble and 15 particulate - Table 3-4).

Table 3-4 - CNPIPLIB Library State Variables

13 Polyphosphate accumulating biomass xbp gCOD/m3
14 Poly-hydroxy-alkanoates (PHA) xbt gCOD/m3
15 Stored polyphosphate xpp gP/m3
16 Volatile fatty acids slf gCOD/m3
17 Soluble phosphorus sp gP/m3
20 Soluble unbiodegradable organic nitrogen (in si) sni gN/m3
21 Fermentable readily biodegradable substrate sf gCOD/m3
22 Stored glycogen xgly gCOD/m3
23 Stored polyphosphate (releasable) xppr gP/m3
24 Metal-hydroxides xmeoh g/m3
25 Metal-phosphate xmep g/m3


Advanced Carbon - Nitrogen Library (CN2LIB)
STATES AND COMPOSITES

Nineteen (19) state variables are available in the Advanced Carbon - Nitrogen
library (Table 3-5). The major difference between this library and the Carbon -
Nitrogen library lies in the addition of inert nitrogen (both particulate and
soluble), and the division of the nitrification into two steps, which requires
state variables for ammonia and nitrite oxidizers, as well as the division of NOx
into nitrite and nitrate.
Table 3-5 - Advanced Carbon – Nitrogen (CN2LIB) Library State Variables

1 Particulate inert inorganic material xii gCOD/m3
5 Readily biodegradable substrate ss gCOD/m3
6 Rapidly hydrolyzable substrate ssh gCOD/m3
7 Slowly hydrolyzable substrate xs gCOD/m3
9 Active nitrosomonas biomass xbai gCOD/m3
10 Active nitrite oxidizer biomass xbaa gCOD/m3
12 Nitrite N snoi gN/m3
13 Nitrate N snoa gN/m3
14 Soluble inert organic nitrogen (in si) sni gN/m3
15 Particulate inert organic nitrogen (in xi) xni gN/m3
19 Alkalinity salk moles/m3

Advanced Industrial Pollutant Library (CN2IPLIB)
STATE VARIABLES
Forty-nine (49) state variables are available in the Advanced Industrial
Pollutant library (Table 3-6). The major difference between this library and the
Advanced Carbon - Nitrogen library is the addition of Thirty (30) user-
definable state variables (15 soluble and 15 particulate).
Table 3-6 - Advanced Industrial Pollutant (CN2IPLIB) Library State Variables

1 Particulate inert inorganic material xii gCOD/m3
5 Readily biodegradable substrate ss gCOD/m3
6 Rapidly hydrolyzable substrate ssh gCOD/m3
7 Slowly hydrolyzable substrate xs gCOD/m3
9 Active nitrosomonas biomass xbai gCOD/m3
10 Active nitrite oxidizer biomass xbaa gCOD/m3
12 Nitrite N snoi gN/m3
13 Nitrate N snoa gN/m3
14 Soluble inert organic nitrogen (in si) sni gN/m3
15 Particulate inert organic nitrogen (in xi) xni gN/m3


Comprehensive library (mantis2LIB)
STATE VARIABLES
Fifty-two (52) state variables are available in the Comprehensive Model
(MANTIS2LIB) library (Table 3-7).
Table 3-7 - Comprehensive Model Library (MANTIS2LIB) State Variables

State Variables GPS-X Cryptic Units
Symbols
2 Soluble inert organic si gCOD/m3
3 Colloidal organic substrate scol gCOD/m3
4 Fermentable substrate ss gCOD/m3
5 Acetate sac gCOD/m3
6 Propionate spro gCOD/m3
7 Methanol smet gCOD/m3
8 Dissolved hydrogen sh2 gCOD/m3
9 Dissolved methane sch4 gCOD/m3
10 Dissolved inorganic carbon stic gC/m3
11 Soluble organic nitrogen snd gN/m3
12 Ammonia nitrogen snh gN/m3
13 Nitrite nitrogen snoi gN/m3
14 Nitrate nitrogen snoa gN/m3
15 Dissolved nitrogen sn2 gN/m3
16 Ortho-phosphate sp gP/m3
17 Dissolved calcium sca gCa/m3
18 Dissolved magnesium smg gMg/m3
19 Dissolved potassium spot gK/m3
20 Dissolved cation scat eq/m3

21 Dissolved anion sana eq/m3

22 Inert Particulate xi gCOD/m3
23 Un-biodegradable cell decay material xu gCOD/m3
24 Slowly biodegradable organics xs gCOD/m3
25 PHA accumulated in PAO xbt gCOD/m3
26 Heterotrophic biomass xbh gCOD/m3
27 Phosphate accumulating biomass xbp gCOD/m3
28 Ammonia oxidizer xbai gCOD/m3
29 Nitrite oxidizer xbaa gCOD/m3
30 Anammox biomass xbax g COD/m3
31 Methylotrophic biomass xmet g COD/m3
32 Fermentative biomass xbf g COD/m3
33 Acetogen xbpro gCOD/m3
34 Acetate methanogens xbacm gCOD/m3
35 Hydrogen methanogens xbh2m gCOD/m3
36 Nitrogen in slowly deg. organics xns gN/m3
37 Phosphorous in slowly deg. organics xps gP/m3
38 Poly-phosphate accumulated in PAO xpp gP/m3
39 Particulate inert inorganic xii g/m3
40 Aluminum hydroxide xaloh gAl(OH)3/m3
41 Aluminum phosphate xalpo4 gAlPO4/m3
42 Iron hydroxide xfeoh gFe(OH)3/m3
43 Iron phosphate xfepo4 gFePO4/m3
44 Calcium carbonate xcaco3 gCaCO3/m3
45 Calcium phosphate xcapo4 gCa3(PO4)2/m3
46 Magnesium hydrogen phosphate xmghpo4 gMgHPO4.3H2O/m3
47 Magnesium carbonate xmgco3 gMgCO3/m3
48 Ammonium magnesium phosphate(struvite) xmgnh4po4 gMgNH4PO4.6H2O /m3

GPS-X Composite Variable Calculations 35
CHAPTER 4
GPS-X Composite Variable Calculations
What is a Composite Variable?

In GPS-X, a group of state variables (such as oxygen, heterotrophic biomass, nitrate,
ammonia, soluble substrate, particulate substrate, etc.) are calculated for each connection
point in the plant layout. These state variables are the fundamental components that are
acted upon by the processes in the models in each library.
These particular state variable components are not always easily measurable or
interpretable in practical applications. Therefore, a series of composite variables are
calculated from the state variables. The composite variables combine the state variables
into forms that are typically measured, such as total suspended solids (TSS), BOD, COD
and Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN).
Stoichiometry Settings
The way that the composite variables are calculated from state variables changes from
library to library and to a great degree from model to model.
Composite variables are calculated from state variables with the use of stoichiometric
constants. These constants describe the relationships between various states and
composites, and depend on the type of composite calculations used.
Stoichiometry Calculations
NOMENCLATURE
In this chapter, diagrams and tables are used to depict the relationships between
the state and composite variables included in a library.
Box-and-arrow Diagrams
The nomenclature used in the box-and-arrow diagrams is explained in Figure
4-1.

36 GPS-X Composite Variable Calculations
Y3
x1 k x3
1
Y1 Y2
x2 x4
(depends on model)
Figure 4-1 - Diagram Nomenclature
The variables in the boxes and above the connection lines are known (either
previously calculated or user input). The variables in BOLD CAPITALS
represent the composite variables which are to be calculated. The connection
line shows the direction of calculation and always begins from a known or
boxed variable. Multiple lines converging to one unknown variable imply a
summation operator. In the example shown above, the variable Y1 is calculated
by multiplying the variable x1 by the stoichiometry parameter k and summing
it with variable x2. If no stoichiometry parameter appears above the connection
line, it implies a default value of 1. When a broken line circle is drawn on the
lines, it indicates that the stoichiometry parameters for these lines are model
dependent. In certain situations two or more calculated composite variables are
used to calculate an additional composite variable. For example, Y3 is
calculated by adding the calculated composite variables of Y1 and Y2.
In addition to diagrams which explain the general way composite variables are
calculated, composite variable tables are used to explain model-specific
calculations. The nomenclature used in the composite variables tables is
explained in Table 4-1, Example Composite Variable
Calculations.
Table 4-1 - Example Composite Variable Calculations

SCOMP XCOMP TCOMP
sa 1 1
sb ksb ksb
xa 1 1
xb kxb kxb
The composite variables being calculated are shown across the top of each
column. The state variables used in the calculations are shown down the left
side of the table. To calculate the composite variable, each state variable is
multiplied by the coefficient in the table for that particular composite variable,
and then summed down the column.

For the example data given in Table 4-1, the calculations for
SCOMP, XCOMP and TCOMP are:
SCOMP = 1*sa + ksb*sb + 0*xa + 0*xb = sa + ksb*sb

XCOMP = 0*sa + 0*sb + 1*xa + kxb*xb = xa + kxb*xb
TCOMP = 1*sa + ksb*sb + 1*xa + kxb*xb = sa + ksb*sb + xa + kxb*xb
COMPOSITE VARIABLES IN CNLIB

Figure 4-2 shows the relationships between the CNLIB state variables and the
TSS, BOD and COD composite state variables. Table 4-2 illustrates the same
composite variable calculations in the tabular format.
si
SCOD
SBOD5 fbod SBODU ss

COD
xs
BOD5 BODU
xbh
fbod XCOD
XBOD5 XBODU xba
-1
xsto icv
xu
VSS
xi
X
xii XISS Total
Suspended
Solids
Figure 4-2
Carbon – Nitrogen Library (CNLIB): BOD, COD and Suspended Solids Composite
Variables and their Relationship to the State Variables

Table 4-2 - CNLIB BOD, COD and TSS Composite Variables (All Models)
SBOD XBOD BOD SBO XBO BO SCO XCO CO VS XIS X
U U U D D D D D D S S
si 1 1
ss 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1
xi 1 1 icv- icv
1 -1
-
xs 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv icv
1 -1
xbh 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv- icv

1 -1
-
xba 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv icv
1 -1
xu 1 1 icv- icv
1 -1
-
xst 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv icv
1 -1
o
xii 1 1
The COD composite variables are a sum of state variables (where units are
gCOD/m3). Soluble COD (SCOD) is the sum of the soluble inert organics (si)
and readily biodegradable substrate (ss), while particulate COD (XCOD) is the
sum of the slowly biodegradable substrate (xs), active heterotrophic biomass
(xbh), active autotrophic biomass (xba), cell internal storage product (xsto),
unbiodegradable particulates from cell decay (xu), and particulate inert
organics (xi). The total COD (COD) is the sum of the soluble and particulate
COD.
The suspended solids composite variable (X) is calculated from the particulate
COD (XCOD) by dividing it by the XCOD:VSS ratio (icv), which changes the
units of the XCOD to mgVSS/L, resulting in the volatile suspended solids
(VSS) composite variable. To calculate the suspended solids composite
variable (X), VSS is added to particulate inert inorganic material (XII). By
default in the CN library, particulate inert suspended solids (XISS) is equal to
xii.
The biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) composite variables are calculated

from the state variables. First, the biodegradable state variables (the state
variables that exert BOD, which are in units of gO/m3) are summed to provide
both a particulate and a soluble ultimate BOD (XBODU, SBODU). The sum of
these components is the total ultimate BOD measurement (BODU). To
determine BOD5, the calculated BODU is multiplied by a stoichiometric
fraction, fbod, which is the ratio of BOD5:BODU.

In terms of variables containing nitrogen, the calculation of the composite

variables involves adding up various state variables and multiplying other state
variables by fractions as appropriate (Figure 4-3). The soluble total Kjeldahl
nitrogen (STKN) is the sum of the free and ionized ammonia (snh), soluble
biodegradable organic nitrogen (snd), and (in asm3 only) the nitrogen
components of soluble substrate (ss) and soluble inerts (si). The particulate
total Kjeldahl nitrogen (XTKN) is the particulate biodegradable organic
nitrogen (xnd), plus the nitrogen component of biomass (xbh and xba),
unbiodegradable cell products (xu), particulate substrate (xs) and particulate
inerts (xi). Total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) is the sum of soluble (STKN) and
particulate TKN (XTKN). The total nitrogen (TN) is the sum of the TKN and
the nitrate nitrogen (sno).
Nitrogen Fractions
(depends on the model)
sno TN xbh
xba
snh TKN
xu
snd STKN XTKN
xi
ss xs
si xnd
Figure 4-3
Carbon – Nitrogen Library: Nitrogen Composite Variables and their Relationships to the
State Variables.
The nitrogen fractions of xbh, xba, xu, xi, ss and si vary from model to model.
The nitrogen composite variable relationships for the mantis , asm1 and asm3
models are shown in Table 4-3 through Table 4-5.

Table 4-3 - CNLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – MANTIS Model

STKN XTKN TKN TN
sno 1
snh 1 1 1
snd 1 1 1
xnd 1 1 1
xbh ibhn ibhn ibhn
xba ibhn ibhn ibhn
xu iuhn iuhn iuhn
xi iuhn iuhn iuhn
Table 4-4 - CNLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – ASM1 Model

STKN XTKN TKN TN
sno 1
snh 1 1 1
snd 1 1 1
xnd 1 1 1
xbh ixbn ixbn ixbn
xba ixbn ixbn ixbn
xu ixun ixun ixun
xi ixun ixun ixun
Table 4-5 - CNLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – ASM3 Model

STKN XTKN TKN TN
sno 1
snh 1 1 1
si insi insi insi
ss inss inss inss
xbh inbm inbm inbm
xba inbm inbm inbm
xs inxs inxs inxs
xi inxi inxi inxi
snd 1 1 1
xnd 1 1 1
COMPOSITE VARIABLES IN CNIPLIB

The relationships between the state and composite variables are the same as
those for CNLIB (Figure 4-3 and Table 4-5). Table 4-3 through
Table 4-5 illustrates the composite variable calculations for the mantis , asm1,
and asm3 models in CNIPLIB.

COMPOSITE VARIABLES IN CNPLIB

Figure 4-4 shows the relationships between CNPLIB state variables and the
TSS, BOD and COD composite variables. Table 4-6 illustrates the same
composite variable calculations in tabular format.
As all the state variables are in units of gCOD/m3, the COD composite
variables are simply a sum of the appropriate state variables. In general, the
soluble COD (SCOD) is a sum of the soluble inert organics (si), volatile fatty
acids (slf), fermentable readily biodegradable substrate (sf), and readily
biodegradable substrate (ss). The particulate COD (XCOD) is a sum of the
slowly biodegradable substrate (xs), active heterotrophic biomass (xbh), active
autotrophic biomass (xba), polyphosphate accumulating biomass (xbp), stored
glycogen (xgly), poly-hydroxy-alkanoates (xbt), unbiodegradable particulates
from cell decay (xu), cell internal storage product (xsto) and particulate inert
organics (xi). The total COD (COD) is the sum of the soluble and particulate
COD.

si
sf
SCOD
SBOD5 fbod SBODU slf
COD
ss
BOD5 BODU
xs
fbod xbh
XBOD5 XBODU
XCOD
xba
-1
icv
xbp
xgly VSS
xbt
X
Total
xsto Suspended
Solids
xu
xi
xii
xmep
xmeoh XISS
xpp
xppr
Figure 4-4
Carbon – Nitrogen – Phosphorus Library: BOD, COD and Suspended Solids Composite
and their relationship to the State Variables.

The suspended solids composite variable is calculated from the particulate

COD (XCOD) by dividing it by the XCOD:VSS ratio (icv). This changes the
units of the XCOD to gVSS/m3, resulting in the composite variable for volatile
suspended solids (VSS). To calculate the suspended solids composite variable
(X), VSS is added to the concentration of inert inorganic particulates (XII),
metal hydroxides (xmeoh) and metal phosphates (xmep), and stored
polyphosphate (multiplied by 3 to change from gP/m3 to g/m3).

from the state variables. The biodegradable state variables (the state variables
that exert BOD, which are in units of gCOD/m3) are summed to provide a
particulate and a soluble ultimate BOD (XBODU, SBODU). The sum of these
components is the total ultimate BOD measurement (BODU). To determine
BOD5, a stoichiometric fraction, fbod, which is the ratio of BOD5:BOD20, is
multiplied by the calculated BODU.
Table 4-6 - CNPLIB BOD, COD and TSS and Composite Variables
SBODU XBODU BODU SBOD XBOD BOD SCOD XCOD COD VSS XISS X
sf 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1
slf 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1
xs 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv-1 icv-
1
-1
xbh 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv icv-
1
-1
xba 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv icv-
1
-1
xbp 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv icv-
1
si 1 1
xi 1 1 icv-1 icv-
1
-1
xu 1 1 icv icv-
1
xgly 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv-1 icv-

1
-1
xbt 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv icv-
1
xsto 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv-1 icv-

1
xii 1 1
xmeoh 1 1
xmep 1 1
xpp 3 3
xppr 3 3


variables is similar to the calculations done in the Carbon - Nitrogen library.
The differences include the addition of a new state variable, soluble
unbiodegradable organic nitrogen (sni), to the soluble TKN (STKN), the
inclusion of nitrogen components of the new substrate type (sf), and the
inclusion of nitrogen components of poly-phosphate-accumulating organisms
(xbp). See Figure 4-5 for a general diagram of the nitrogen composite variable
calculations.
Nitrogen Fractions
sno TN xbh
snh xba
TKN
snd xbp
STKN XTKN
sni xu
ss xi
si xs
sf Nitrogen Fractions
xnd
Figure 4-5
Carbon – Nitrogen Phosphorus Library: Nitrogen Composite Variables and their
Relationships to the State Variables
Table 4-7 - CNPLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – MANTIS Model

STKN XTKN TKN TN
sno 1
snh 1 1 1
sni 1 1 1
snd 1 1 1
xnd 1 1 1
xbh ibhn ibhn ibhn
xba ibhn ibhn ibhn
xi iuhn iuhn iuhn
xu iuhn iuhn iuhn

The calculation for nitrogen state variables differs slightly from model to
model. In particular, the nitrogen fractions of biomass and other particulate
components have different names from model to model. Table 4-7 through
Table 4-11 shows the nitrogen composite variable calculations for the mantis ,
asm1, asm2d , asm3 and newgeneral models in CNPLIB.
Table 4-8 - CNPLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – ASM1 Model

STKN XTKN TKN TN
sno 1
snh 1 1 1
sni 1 1 1
snd 1 1 1
xnd 1 1 1
xbh ixbn ixbn ixbn
xba ixbn ixbn ixbn
xi ixun ixun ixun
xu ixun ixun ixun
Table 4-9 - CNPLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – ASM2d Model
STKN XTKN TKN TN
sno 1
snh 1 1 1
sni 1 1 1
snd 1 1 1
xnd 1 1 1
si insi insi insi
sf insf insf insf
xbp inbm inbm inbm
xbh inbm inbm inbm
xba inbm inbm inbm
xi inxi inxi inxi
xs inxs inxs inxs
Table 4-10 - CNPLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – ASM3 Model
STKN XTKN TKN TN
sno 1
snh 1 1 1
sni 1 1 1
snd 1 1 1
xnd 1 1 1
xbh inbm inbm inbm
xba inbm inbm inbm
xi inxi inxi inxi
xs inxs inxs inxs
ss inss inss inss
si insi insi insi

Table 4-11 - CNPLIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – NEWGENERAL model

STKN XTKN TKN TN
sno 1
snh 1 1 1
sni 1 1 1
snd 1 1 1
xnd 1 1 1
xbp fnzh fnzh fnzh
xbh fnzh fnzh fnzh
xba fnzh fnzh fnzh
xi fnzeh fnzeh fnzeh
xu fnzeh fnzeh fnzeh
Generally, soluble total phosphorus (STP) is equal to the sum of soluble

phosphorus (sp) and the phosphorus components of ss, si, and sf, as
appropriate. Particulate total phosphorus (XTP) is the sum of stored
polyphosphate (xpp and xppr) and the phosphorus components of xs, xi, xbh,
xba, xbp and xmeoh. See Figure 4-6 for a schematic of these calculations. The
calculations differ slightly from model to model. Table 4-12 to Table 4-15
describe the phosphorus composite variable calculations.
Phosphorus Fractions
xi
Phosphorus Fractions
sf xs
TP
ss xu
si STP XTP xbh
xba
sp
0.205 xbp
xpp xppr xmep
Figure 4-6
Carbon – Nitrogen – Phosphorus Library: Phosphorus Composite Variables and
their Relationship to the State Variables

Table 4-12 - CNPLIB Phosphorus Composite Variables – ASM1/MANTIS models

STP XTP TP
sp 1 1
xi ixup ixup
xu ixup ixup
xbh ixbp ixbp
xba ixbp ixbp
xbp ixbp ixbp
xmep 0.205 0.205
xpp 1 1
xppr 1 1
Table 4-13 - CNPLIB Phosphorus Composite Variables – ASM3 Model

STP XTP TP
sp 1 1
ss ipss ipss
si ipsi ipsi
xi ipxi ipxi
xs ipxs ipxs
xbh ixbp ixbp
xba ixbp ixbp
xbp ixbp ixbp
xmep 0.205 0.205
xpp 1 1
xppr 1 1
Table 4-14 - CNPLIB Phosphorus Composite Variables – ASM2d Model

STP XTP TP
sp 1 1
sf ipsf ipsf
si ipsi ipsi
xi ipxi ipxi
xs ipxs ipxs
xbh ipbm ipbm
xba ipbm ipbm
xbp ipbm ipbm
xmep 0.205 0.205
xpp 1 1
xppr 1 1

Table 4-15 - CNPLIB Phosphorus Composite Variables – NEWGENERAL Model

STP XTP TP
sp 1 1
xpp 1 1
xppr 1 1
xi fpzeh fpzeh
xu fpzeh fpzeh
xbh fpzh fpzh
xba fpzh fpzh
xbp fpzh fpzh
xmep 0.205 0.205
COMPOSITE VARIABLES IN CNPIPLIB

The relationships between the state variables and composite variables are
similar to the Carbon-Nitrogen-Phosphorus library (CNPLIB). Table 4-7
through Table 4-15 shows the relationships between the state and composite
variables that are used in the models in CNPIPLIB.
COMPOSITE VARIABLES IN CN2LIB

Figure 4-7 shows the relationships between CN2LIB state variables and the
TSS, BOD and COD composite variables. The suspended solids composite
variable is calculated from the particulate COD (XCOD) by dividing by the
XCOD:VSS ratio (icv) which changes the units of the XCOD to gVSS/m3,
resulting in the composite variable for volatile suspended solids (VSS). To
calculate the suspended solids composite variable (X), the VSS is added to the
particulate inert inorganic material (xii) state variable. Table 4-16 shows the
BOD, COD and TSS composite variable calculations for the mantis model.
Table 4-17 shows the BOD, COD, and TSS composite variable calculations for
the twostepmantis model.

Table 4-16 - CN2LIB BOD, COD and TSS and Comp. Var. – MANTIS Model
si 1 1
ssh
xs 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv-1 icv-
1
-1
xbh 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv icv-
1
xbai 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv-1 icv-

1
xbaa 1 1
xi 1 1 icv-1 icv-
1
-1
xu 1 1 icv icv-
1
xii 1 1
Table 4-17 - CN2LIB BOD, COD and TSS and Comp. Var. – TWOSTEPMANTIS Model
si 1 1
ssh 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1
xs 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv-1 icv-1
xbh 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv-1 icv-1
xbai 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv-1 icv-1
xbaa 1 1 fbod fbod 1 1 icv-1 icv-1
xi 1 1 icv-1 icv-1
xu 1 1 icv-1 icv-1
xii 1 1

from the state variables. The biodegradable state variables (the state variables
that exert BOD) are summed to provide both a particulate and a soluble
ultimate BOD (XBODU, SBODU). The sum of these components is the total
ultimate BOD measurement (BODU). To determine BOD5, a stoichiometric
fraction, fbod, which is the ratio of BOD5:BODU, is multiplied by the calculated
BODU.

si
ssh
SCOD
SBOD5 fbod SBODU
ss
COD
BOD5 BODU xs
xbh
XBOD5 fbod XBODU XCOD

xbai
-1
xbaa icv
xu
VSS
xi
X
xii XISS Total
Suspended
Solids
Figure 4-7
Advanced Carbon – Nitrogen Library: BOD, COD and Suspended Solids
Composite Variables and their Relationship to the State Variables

Table 4-18 - CN2LIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – MANTIS Model

SNO STKN XTKN TKN TN
snoi
snoa 1 1
snh 1 1 1
sni
snd 1 1 1
xni
xnd 1 1 1
xbh ibhn ibhn ibhn
xbaa
xbai ibhn ibhn ibhn
xu iuhn iuhn iuhn
xi iuhn iuhn iuhn
Table 4-19 - CN2LIB Nitrogen Composite Variables – TWOSTEPMANTIS Model

SNO STKN XTKN TKN TN
snoi 1 1
snoa 1 1
snh 1 1 1
sni 1 1 1
snd 1 1 1
xni 1 1 1
xnd 1 1 1
xbh ibn ibn ibn
xbaa ibn ibn ibn
xbai ibn ibn ibn
xi ibn ibn ibn

variables is relatively straightforward. In general, soluble TKN (STKN) is the
sum of the free and ionized ammonia (snh), soluble biodegradable organic
nitrogen (snd) and soluble inert organic nitrogen (sni). The TKN is the sum of
the STKN, particulate biodegradable organic nitrogen (xnd), inert particulate
nitrogen (xni) and nitrogen associated with the organic fractions. The total
nitrogen (TN) is the sum of the TKN and nitrate and nitrite (snoa and snoi).

Nitrogen Fractions
snoa xbh
SNO TN
snoi xbaa
TKN
sni xbai
STKN XTKN
snh xi
snd xu
xni
xnd
Figure 4-8
Advanced Carbon – Nitrogen Library: Nitrogen Composite Variables and their
Relation to the State Variables
Table 4-18 and
Table 4-19 show the nitrogen composite variable calculation in tabular format
for the mantis and twostepmantis models respectively and Figure 4-8 shows the
nitrogen composite variable calculation in graphical format.
COMPOSITE VARIABLES IN CN2IPLIB

The relationships between the state variables and composite variables are
similar to the Advanced Carbon-Nitrogen library (CN2LIB). Table 4-18 to
Table 4-19 shows the relationships between the state and composite variables
that are used in the CN2IPLIB models.

COMPOSITE VARIABLES IN MANTIS2LIB

The composite variable calculation schemes in MANTSI2LIB are shown in
Figure 4-9 to Figure 4-13. The Figure 4-9 shows the scheme for estimation of
soluble BOD5 (SBOD), particulate BOD5 (XBOD), BOD5 (BOD), soluble
ultimate BOD (SBODU), particulate ultimate BOD (SBODU), ultimate BOD
(BODU), soluble COD (SCOD), particulate COD (XCOD) and COD (COD).
The list of stoichiometric parameters used in the estimation of composite
variables is provided in Table 4-20.
Table 4-20 - Stoichiometry parameters used in estimation of BOD and BODU

Stoichiometry Default Description
Parameter Value
yhglobal 0.666 Biomass yield
fuu 0.206 Fraction of unbiodegradable residue in biomass
fssbodtosscod 0.717 BOD5 to COD ratio of soluble substrate
fpsbodtopscod 0.703 BOD5 to COD ratio of particulate substrate
fbbodtobcod 0.566 BOD5 to COD ratio of biomass
The default value of the stoichiometry parameters can be changed in the

System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry menu.
The Figure 4-10 shows the scheme for estimation of Volatile Suspended Solid
(VSS), Inorganic Suspended Solid (XISS) and Total Suspended Solid (TSS)
concentration. In the estimation of VSS, each biomass concentration is
multiplied by a corresponding VSS to COD factor. For example, ivsstocodxbh
is the VSS to COD ratio for heterotrophic biomass, xbh. The VSS to COD
ratio for each biomass type are calculated based on the biomass composition.
The default composition of biomass can be accessed and changed in the
System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry menu.
As the composition of xs and xi are not well known, the VSS to COD ratios for
these states ivsstocodxs and ivsstocodxi are provided as direct inputs. These
ratios can be accessed and changed in System > Input Parameters > Influent
Stoichiometry menu. The state variable of xns is included in the calculation of
VSS for being consistent with the practice of considering the N fraction in
biomass as part of VSS. A stoichiometry factor of 17.0/14.0 is used to convert
N to NH3.
In the calculation of Inorganic Suspended Solid (XISS), each biomass

concentration is multiplied by the inorganic fraction in the biomass. The
inorganic fraction for each biomass is estimated by subtracting the VSS to SS
ratio for each individual biomass from one. The VSS to SS ratio for each

individual biomass type is calculated by using the set biomass composition, for
example ivsstossxbh is the VSS to SS ratio calculated for the xbh biomass type.
The composite variable of XISS also includes the contribution from the
inorganic states in the model. The mass contributions from the xpp and xps
states are calculated by using a stoichiometry factor of 95/31. The factor
reflects the conversion from molecular weight of P to molecular weight of
PO43-. For all the other inorganic states a stoichiometry ratio of 1 is used.
The Total Suspended Solid (TSS) concentration is calculated by the sum of

estimated VSS and XISS
The Figure 4-11 shows the scheme for estimation of soluble part of Total
Kjeldahl Nitrogen (STKN), particulate part of Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
(XTKN), Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN), Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total
Nitrogen including dissolved Nitrogen (TN & dissolved gas). In the estimation
of STKN, the stoichiometry ratio of, insi is used to estimate the organic
nitrogen present in the si state variable. In the estimation of XTKN, each
biomass concentration is multiplied by a corresponding stoichiometry factor
representing the N content in the corresponding biomass. For example, inxbh is
the stoichiometry factor representing the N content in the heterotrophic
biomass, xbh. The N fraction for each biomass type is calculated based on the
biomass composition. The default composition of biomass can be accessed and
changed in the System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry menu. In the
calculation of XTKN, the N contained in the MgNH4PO4 is also included.
Although, in strict sense this is not a part of the organic nitrogen, it is assumed
that the ammonia contained in the precipitate shall reflect in the analytical
measurement of TKN.
Phosphorus (STP), particulate organic part of Total Phosphorus (XTOP),
particulate inorganic part of Total Phosphorus (XTIP) and Total Phosphorus.
In the estimation of STP, the stoichiometry ratio of, ipnsi is used to estimate
the phosphorus present in the si state variable. In the estimation of XTOP,
each biomass concentration is multiplied by a corresponding stoichiometry
factor representing the P content in the corresponding biomass. For example,
ipxbh is the stoichiometry factor representing the P content in the heterotrophic
biomass, xbh. The P fraction for each biomass type is calculated based on the
changed in the System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry menu. In the
calculation of XTIP, the P contained in various P- precipitates is included. The
stoichiometry factor for each precipitate are estimated based on the
composition of the precipitate. These stoichiometry factors are also available in
Global Fixed stoichiometry menu. The composite variable of XTP is estimated by
the sum of XTOP and XTIP. The TP is estimated by the sum of STP and
XTP.

Organic Carbon (STOC), particulate part of Total Organic Carbon (XTOC),
and Total Organic Carbon. In the estimation of STOC, the stoichiometry ratio
of icsac, icsmet, icspro are estimated based on the substrate compositions. The
stoichiometry factor of icscol, icsi and icss on the other hand needs to be set by
direct user input. These factors can be accessed and changed in System > Input
Parameters > Influent stoichiometry menu. In the estimation of XTOC, each
biomass concentration is multiplied by a corresponding stoichiometry factor
representing the C content in the corresponding biomass. For example, icpxbh
is the stoichiometry factor representing the C content in the heterotrophic
biomass, xbh. The C fraction for each biomass type is calculated based on the
changed in the System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry menu. For
the particulate states of xi and xs, the user can directly enter the C content in the
System > Input Parameters > Influent stoichiometry menu. The composite variable of
TOC is estimated by the sum of XTOC and STOC.
Table 4-21 presents the summary of the stoichiometry parameters used in the
MANTSI2LIB and access menus for changing the default values.
Table 4-21
Access Menus for Different Stoichiometry Parameters in MANTIS2LIB
Stoichiometry Access Menu
Parameter
yhglobal System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry
fuu System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry
fssbodtosscod System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry
fpsbodtopscod System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry
fbbodtobcod System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry
COD to VSS ratio for System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry
biomass (Calculated based on biomass composition)
COD to VSS ratio for System > Input Parameters > Influent stoichiometry
xs and xi
VSS to SS ratio for System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry
biomass (Calculated based on biomass composition)
N fraction in biomass System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry
(Calculated based on biomass composition)
N fraction in xi, si Influent Characterization menu of influent object
P fraction in biomass System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry
(Calculated based on biomass composition)
P fraction in xi, si Influent Characterization menu of influent object
C fraction in biomass System > Input Parameters > Global Fixed stoichiometry
and sac, spro, smet (Calculated based on biomass/substrate composition)
C fraction in System > Input Parameters > Influent stoichiometry
xcol,xss,si,xi,xs

ss
(1-yhglobal*fuu)
SBODU sac
spro
SBOD
fssbodtosscod
SCOD
smet
BOD
fpsbodtopscod scol
BODU XBOD
fbbodtobcod
si
xbt xs
COD
(1-fuu)
xbh
XBODU xbai
(1-yhglobal*fuu)
xbaa
XCOD
xbp
xbpro
xbacm
xbh2m
xbax
xbmet
xbf
xi
Figure 4-9
MANTIS2LIB – Calculation Procedure for Composite Variables SCOD, COD, SBOD,
BOD, SBODu and BODu

-1
icodtovssxbh xbh 1-ivsstossxbh 95/31 xpp
-1
icodtovssxbai xbai 1-ivsstossxbai 95/31 xps
-1
icodtovssxbaa xbaa 1-ivsstossxbaa xaloh
-1
icodtovssxbp xbp 1-ivsstossxbp xalpo4
-1
icodtovssxbpro xbpro 1-ivsstossxbpro xfeoh
-1
icodtovssxbacm xbacm 1-ivsstossxbacm Xfepo4
-1
icodtovssxxbh2m xbh2m 1-ivsstossxbh2m xcaco3
-1
icodtovssxbax xbax 1-ivsstossxbax xmgco3
-1
icodtovssxbmet xbmet 1-ivsstossxbmet xmgnh4po4
-1
icodtovssxbf xbf 1-ivsstossxbf xcapo4
xmghpo4
VSS XISS
xii
-1
icodtovssxi xi
-1
icodtovssxs xs
-1 TSS
icodtovssxbt xbt
17/14 xns
Figure 4-10
MANTIS2LIB – Calculation Procedure for Composite Variables VSS, TSS

xbh inxbh
TN & Dissolved Gas

xbai inxbai
sn2
xbaa inxbaa
xbp inxbp snoi

TN
xbpro inxbpro snoa
xbacm inxbacm
TKN
xbh2m inxbh2m
xbax inxbax XTKN STKN
xbmet inxbmet snh
xbf inxbf snd
xi inxi insi si
inxmgnh4po4
xu inxu
xns xmgnh4po4
Figure 4-11
MANTIS2LIB – Calculation Procedure for Composite Variables STKN and TKN

xbh ipxbh
xbai ipxbai
STP
xbaa ipxbaa sp
xbp ipxbp ipsi si

TP
xbpro ipxbpro
xbacm ipxbacm
XTP
xbh2m ipxbh2m
xbax ipxbax XTOP XTIP
xbmet ipxbmet ipxalpo4 xalpo4
xbf ipxbf ipxfepo4 xfepo4

ipxmgnh4po4
xi ipxi ipxcapo4 xcapo4
xu ipxu xmgnh4po4 ipxmghpo4 xmghpo4
xpp
xps
Figure 4-12
MANTIS2LIB – Calculation Procedure for Composite Variables STP, XTP and TP

xbh icxbh
xbai icxbai
xbaa icxbaa
xbp icxbp
xbpro icxbpro
icsac sac
xbacm icxbacm
icscol scol
TOC
xbh2m icxbh2m
icsmet smet
xbax icxbax XTOC STOC

icspro spro
xbmet icxbmet
icss ss
xbf icxbf
icsi si
xi icxi
xu icxu
xs icxs
xbt icxbt
Figure 4-13
MANTIS2LIB – Calculation Procedure for Composite Variables STOC and TOC

Displaying Composite Variables

All of the composite variables, including the most common ones such as X (total
suspended solids), TKN (Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen), BOD, COD, etc., can be accessed by
selecting the Display Variables > Composite Variables menu. These variables (and those found
by clicking on the More... button) can be tagged and placed on output graphs.
COMPOSITE VARIABLES CALCULATED FROM NON-

MODELLED STATES
Whether stoichiometry has been set globally or locally within each object, the
list of composite variables that are available to be displayed will depend on
which library has been used for that particular GPS-X layout (CNLIB,
CNPLIB, CN2IPLIB, etc.).
It is possible to use a model in the layout that does not simulate the fate of all
components of a given library (e.g. mantis in CNPLIB, which does not model
phosphorus even though there are phosphorus state variables in CNPLIB). In
these cases, these extra components will be modelled as if they were inert (i.e.
no biological transformation applied, but mixing and settling are applied).
The composite variable list displayed in the Display Variables > Composite
Variables menu is the list associated with the library used to create the layout
(e.g. CNPLIB). All composite variables are calculated for the given library,
even if the component states are not modelled biologically in the reactor. For
the example above (mantis model in CNPLIB), soluble phosphorus (sp) is not
modelled biologically, and therefore behaves the same as si (soluble inerts).
However, because CNPLIB contains the composite variable TP (total
phosphorus), it will be calculated (from sp and other components) even though
sp was modelled as an inert.
It is important to take this into consideration when selecting which model and
library you will be using when creating your plant layout.

Influent Models 63
CHAPTER 5
Influent Models
Introduction
For every influent model that is used in a wastewater plant layout, it is important to
properly specify the influent characteristics and also the influent stoichiometry.
Influent Advisor
To help users better understand influent characterization, a special utility program, called
Influent Advisor, was developed by Hydromantis. The tool helps users to visualize and
debug influent characterization data. It is recommended that users make use of this utility
tool so that influent characterization errors can be avoided.
The mathematical description of the influent wastewater that is fed to the plant model is
the single most important aspect of a simulated system. Without significant consideration
of the influent characterization, the plant model will be limited in its ability to predict the
dynamic behavior of the plant.
To access the Influent Advisor tool, right-click on any Wastewater Influent object, and
select the Composition > Influent Characterization menu item.
Figure 5-1 - Opening the Influent Advisor Tool

64 Influent Models
The Influent Advisor screen shows three columns of data: User Inputs, State Variables,
and Composite Variables, as shown in Figure 5-2
Figure 5-2 - Influent Advisor Menu

The fields in the left-hand column show the inputs available to the user, such as influent
concentrations and stoichiometric ratios. The centre and right-hand columns show the
state variable and composite variable concentrations calculated from the user inputs.
As the user changes values in the left-hand column, the variables in the centre and right-
hand columns are automatically updated. This allows for easy debugging of confusing or
conflicting influent characterization data.
Clicking on any variable in the centre and right-hand column illustrates how that value is
calculated. The formula will be displayed in the formula box (located in the lower middle
of the screen – you may need to scroll down to see it). The values used in the formula
will be highlighted in the tables so that the applicable cells can be identified. If a negative
value is calculated in either table, the cell will turn red. Correcting problematic data is a
matter of adjusting the input cells to achieve non-negative values.

Influent Models 65
Figure 5-3
Influent Advisor Screen Showing Highlighted Cells and Negative Values
High-lighted in Red
The influent models used in GPS-X make certain assumptions about what data may or
may not be available. For instance, no influent model uses both COD and BOD data,
even though this data may be available and may provide important information about
how that organic material is partitioned into the available state variables. Influent Advisor
helps overcome this shortcoming.
Take an example in which BOD and COD data is available and the BODbased model is
chosen for the influent object. The applicable data can be entered into Influent Advisor,
including the available BOD data. The user can then scroll to the right table and check
the COD value calculated based on the input data. If the COD data is in agreement with
the measured COD data (assuming no negative values in any cells), then the user can be
assured that the input data is consistent with the available data. If the COD data is
different from the measured COD, then the unknown (or estimated) input data should be
adjusted until acceptable agreement is achieved.
Please Note: Because correctly setting up the influent is critically important to the
simulation, a set of warning messages has been developed and when necessary
these will appear in the Command window. For instance, if the user inadvertently
enters a value for xsto, but has chosen ASM1 as the local biological model, then a
warning message (`time = <timestamp> xsto<streamlabel> is non-zero, xsto
is not a state variable in ASM1') will appear in the Log window. This is a
signal to go back to the influent data forms and correct a problem with the influent.
It is recommended that Influent Advisor be used to debug your influent
characterization.

66 Influent Models
Hydromantis recommends that users make full use of Influent Advisor as a tool to help
identify problems and understand the interconnectivity between state and composite
variables.
During a simulation error messages related to the influent may appear in the simulation
Log window. These messages will most likely be the result of improper influent
stoichiometry. If an error message does appear, then the influent stoichiometry should be
examined for possible errors.
Influent objects in CNLIB, CNPLIB, CN2LIB, CNIPLIB, CNPIPLIB,

CN2IPLIB
There are four influent objects in GPS-X:
Models
Name Object Use
Available
bodbased
codfractions
Continuous wastewater flows codstates
Wastewater Influent
(steady or dynamic) sludge
states
tsscod
acetate
COD Chemical Dosage of COD
methanol
Dosage into streams or objects
water
bodbased
codfractions
Batch deliveries of septage or
codstates
Batch Influent other discontinuous wastewater
sludge
flows
states
tsscod
Clean water input

water
Water Influent (steady or dynamic)
The three influent objects contain models, options and features that are relevant to the
type of influent being used. For example the continuous wastewater model has options
for specifying a diurnal pattern for influent flow, a feature not found in the chemical
dosage object.

Influent Models 67
WASTEWATER INFLUENT OBJECT

The wastewater influent object (grey arrow) is used to characterize continuous
streams of wastewater flow. The continuous influent flow rate is specified in
the influent object’s Flow > Flow Data menu (Figure 5-4 and Figure 5-5).
Figure 5-4 - Selecting the Influent Flow Data Menu
Figure 5-5 - Influent Flow Data Menu, showing Flow Type Options
The flow is specified via one of 5 methods:
1. Data – users set the flow rate directly, via menu entry or read from file
2. – GPS-X applies a sinusoidal curve to the influent flow set in

Sinusoidal
the menu or read from file
3. Diurnal Flow – a daily diurnal pattern is set via flow rates at different
times of the day
4. Diurnal Flow Factor – a daily diurnal pattern is set via factors (for
different times of the day) which are multiplied by the influent flow set
in the menu or read from file

68 Influent Models
5. Runoff– an empirical, stochastic model is used to generate flow patterns

based on storm runoff
RUNOFF MODEL
The runoff flow model uses a parallel linear reservoir model to simulate wet
weather flow in sanitary and combined sewer systems. This model is not a
mechanistic hydrological model, but a simple mathematical transformation.
The equations are:
Pd ×Cd = Ptotal (5.1)
and
Pi × Ci = Ptotal (5.2)
where:
Pd = rainfall that enters the sewer system directly
Pi = rainfall that enters the sewer system indirectly
Ptotal = total rainfall over the catchment area
Cd = fraction of total rainfall that enters the sewer system directly
Ci = fraction of total rainfall that enters the sewer system indirectly
Total runoff (Qtotal) is calculated with the following equation:
Qtotal = Qd + Qi (5.3)
which is based in the following equations:
Qi = Ki ×Vi (5.4)
Qd = Kd ×Vd (5.5)
= (Pi × A) − Qi
dVi
(5.6)
dt
= (Pd × A) − Qd
dVd
(5.7)
dt
where:

Influent Models 69
Kd = decay rate of linear reservoir representing direct runoff
Ki = decay rate of linear reservoir representing indirect runoff
A = total catchment area
WASTEWATER INFLUENT MODELS

The influent models available in GPS-X depend on the model library and the
local biological model used to relate the state variables to the composite
variables. The manner in which the state variables are calculated sometimes
differs from model to model and library to library. This chapter discusses the
models available and the flow choices available with the batch influent object.
Figure 5-6 - The Influent Models

(left - Wastewater, right - Chemical Dosage)
Each influent model calculates a complete set of library-dependent state

variables that are passed to the rest of the plant layout. The influent models
differ only in the type of information required as inputs to the model.
The descriptions of the influent models that follow are an overview of how
they work; however, due to their complexity and their dependence on the local
biological model and the library currently in use, users are referred to Influent
Advisor to understand the calculations being made in each model.
BODbased
The bodbased influent model is the choice when BOD data is available and
COD data is not available. However, due to the approximations and the nature
of the BOD measurement, special care must be taken to properly estimate
influent particulate inerts. If this model is selected, the user inputs total
carbonaceous BOD5, total TKN, total suspended solids, a few state variables
(the state variables are normally zero except for the soluble inert organics,
soluble ortho-phosphate (cnplib) and alkalinity (Figure 5-7 and Figure 5-8 and
several stoichiometric fractions. These inputs are used to calculate the
remaining influent state variables: readily biodegradable substrate (ss), slowly

70 Influent Models
biodegradable substrate (xs), particulate inert organics (xi), free and ionized
ammonia (snh), particulate biodegradable organic nitrogen (xnd), and soluble
biodegradable organic nitrogen (snd).
Figure 5-7 - CN Library Bodbased Influent Model Inputs
The relationships between the six calculated state variables and the composite
and stoichiometric fractions are library-specific and the relationships are shown
in the appendix to this chapter (Figure 5-25 and Figure 5-26). BODultimate is
assumed to be equivalent to the biodegradable COD and therefore has units of
mg COD/L.
The stoichiometric fraction fss (soluble substrate:BODultimate), is used to

determine what fraction of the total BODultimate is soluble substrate (sf for
asm2d or ss for all other biological models). In terms of sampling
measurements, the fraction fss can be estimated from the ratio of filtered
BOD20 :BOD20. The particulate substrate state variable (xs) is then calculated
by difference (i.e. in cnlib, xs = BODultimate * (1-fss) -xba-xbh-xsto)). The
particulate inert organics (xi) state variable is calculated by subtracting all the
other particulate carbonaceous organic states (xsto, xbh, xba, xu (all input by
user) and xs (calculated above)) from the particulate COD (XCOD).
Calculation of the three unknown nitrogen state variables depends on the

calculation of TKN which is biological model-dependent. For instance, with

Influent Models 71
the asm1 or mantis models the amount of free and ionized ammonia (snh) is the
fraction of ammonia (fnh) multiplied by the TKN. The remainder is the
biodegradable organic nitrogen, which is partitioned into three areas including
nitrogen associated with particulate state variables (i.e. xbh, xba, xi and xu),
and soluble and particulate organic nitrogen (snd and xnd) using the fxn
fraction and the nitrogen fractions of the particulate state variables (Figure
5-8).
Figure 5-8 - CN Library Nutrient Fractions for the Influent Models

This differs from the calculations made when asm3 has been chosen as the local
biological model because snd and xnd are not state variables in asm3. In this
case, soluble TKN is calculated as the difference between the total TKN and
the particulate TKN. The nitrogen associated with the soluble state variables
(ss and si) is subtracted from the soluble TKN and the remaining TKN is
equated to ammonia (snh). Hence, in the asm3 BOD based influent model, fnh
and fxn are not used. Influent Advisor will help users determine what parameters
are necessary for each mode.
CODFractions
This model requires an input of total COD, total TKN, total phosphorus (in
CNPlib), state variables (the state variables are normally zero except for
ammonia, soluble ortho-phosphate and alkalinity) and several stoichiometric
fractions. From these inputs, the complete set of state variables, composite
variables and nutrient fractions are calculated (Figure 5-20 and Figure 5-21).
The calculation of the nitrogen and phosphorus (CNPlib) state variables and
fractions is complicated in the codfractions influent models. This is because
some of the nitrogen and phosphorus in the influent is associated with the
organic state variables (i.e. N content of active biomass). Therefore, the model
must adjust itself depending on the applicable composite variable model and
the current organic states. As with the other influent models, these nutrient
fractions are specified in this model. However, in the event that a mass balance
is not achievable with the user input data, the codfractions model will
recalculate these nutrient fractions to force the mass balance. It is
recommended that Influent Advisor be used to set-up and understand these
calculations
This model has the advantage that each of the calculations is based on the total
COD, total TKN, total phosphorus (CNPlib), soluble ortho-phosphate (CNPlib)
and ammonia inputs. Therefore, (as often is available in practice) a series of

72 Influent Models
these data over a period of time can be read in from a data file and the influent
state variables will vary with the load. This is in contrast to other influent
models in which some state variables are input directly and will not
automatically vary with a load change.
CODstates
This model works similarly to the codfractions influent model, however all
COD input fractions are set as a fraction of total COD. This allows users to
specify total COD, TKN and ammonia as their main characterization inputs.
Soluble inert COD (si), readily biodegradable substrate (ss, sf or slf),
particulate inert material (xi), unbiodegradable cell products (xu) and biomass
concentrations (xbh, xba and xbp) are specified via fractions of total COD, as
shown in Figure 5-9.
Figure 5-9 - CODstates Influent Model Inputs
Sludge
This model has been designed to mimic the input of a sludge stream. The user
inputs the total suspended solids, a few state variables, and a couple of
Influent Models 73
stoichiometric fractions. From these inputs, the organic solids are partitioned
into heterotrophic biomass (i.e. degradable particulate material), polyphosphate
accumulating biomass (CNPlib only) and unbiodegradable particulate material.
The remaining particulate organic state variables are set to zero. Except for
dissolved oxygen and alkalinity, all the soluble state variables are defaulted to
zero in this model.
States
This model is appropriate if a full influent characterization has been performed
and the influent state variables have been calculated manually. If the user
selects the states model, input values for the state variables (
Table 5-2), and a few stoichiometric fractions used for calculating the
composite variables are required. The CNlib states data entry form (Composition
> Influent Composition) is shown in Figure 5-9, and the stoichiometry entry form
(Composition > Influent Stoichiometry) is shown in Figure 5-10
Figure 5-10
CN Library States Influent Model Influent Stoichiometry Inputs

74 Influent Models
TSSCOD
The tsscod influent model can be used successfully if the influent was
characterized using COD and suspended solids as the main components. The
tsscod influent model was developed based on the Activated Sludge Model No.
2 report (Henze et al., 1995).
If this model is selected, the user inputs total COD, total TKN, total suspended
solids, a few state variables (the state variables are normally zero except for the
soluble inert organics, soluble ortho-phosphate (CNPlib) and alkalinity and
several stoichiometric fractions. These inputs are then used to calculate the
remaining state variables (Figure 5-7 and Figure 5-8).
Particulate COD (XCOD) is calculated from the TSS using two stoichiometric
fractions. This is then divided into its component parts via stoichiometric
fractions or explicitly as read from the data input forms leaving the particulate
inert organics component (xi) to be calculated by subtraction. Figure 5-12
shows how the soluble COD (SCOD) components are calculated from the
COD, XCOD and the stoichiometric parameter, frsi. See the bodbased model
for the calculation of the nitrogen and phosphorus (CNPlib) state variables. It is
recommended that Influent Advisor be used to understand these calculations.
REMAINING
TSS ivt (1-frxbh-frxs) XCOD
icv
VSS XCOD
frxs -1 XI
XS xba
frxbh -1
xu
XBH -1
xsto
Figure 5-11
CN Library tsscod Model Particulate Inert Calculation
frsi SI
COD
SCOD 1-frsi
-1 SS
XCOD
Figure 5-12
CN Library tsscod Influent Soluble Components Calculation

Influent Models 75
CHEMICAL DOSAGE INFLUENT OBJECT

The chemical dosage influent object (red arrow) is used to characterize streams
which are not typical wastewater inputs, but rather chemical or water inputs to
a wastewater treatment process. The models found in the chemical dosage
influent have been developed specifically for this purpose, and are set up for
easy conversion of typical chemical components into the state variables used in
the biological models. The flow is specified only through the Data option as
described in Figure 5-5.
Acetate
The acetate influent model can be used to simulate the addition of acetate to the
treatment process. The acetate dose (as acetic acid) can be entered as a
percentage of purity, or in a variety of units (mol acetate/L,
g(acetate*COD)/m3, g(acetate)/L, etc.), by selecting from the drop-down units
menu (Figure 5-13). The COD equivalent of the acetate dose is automatically
converted to slf if asm2d or newgeneral have been chosen for the local biological
model or ss (readily biodegradable substrate) for all other local biological
models.
Figure 5-13
CN Library Acetate Influent Model – Acetate Dose Form
Methanol
The methanol influent model can be used to simulate the addition of methanol to
the treatment process. The methanol dose can be entered as a percentage of
purity, or in a variety of other units (mol methanol/L, g(methanol*COD)/m3,
g(methanol)/L, etc.), by selecting from the units drop-down menu (Figure
5-14). The COD equivalent of the methanol dose is automatically converted to
sf if asm2d has been chosen for the local biological model or ss (readily
biodegradable substrate) for all other local biological models.

76 Influent Models
Figure 5-14 CN Library Methanol Influent Model Inputs
Water
This influent model was developed to simulate a rain event or alkalinity
addition whereby the influent hydraulic load could be increased without
increasing the organic or nitrogen load to the plant. In the water influent, the
only variable to be provided in the composition menu is the alkalinity. All
other state variables are set to zero.
BATCH INFLUENT OBJECT

The difference between the batch influent (truck) object and the continuous
influent objects (arrows) concerns the flow and load types. The available flow
and load types for the batch influent object are average and individual .
In the batch influent, if the average flow and load types are selected, the model
will behave exactly like the continuous influent.
If the individual flow type is selected, there will be an intermittent (or batch)
influent. Under the Flow sub-menu item individual , the user can specify the
starting and ending time of the batch influent, and the volume of each truck (1
truck per day by default - the number of trucks per day is specified in the
Influent Composition sub-menu). The total volume specified will be fed at an
averaged rate over the total dumping time specified, that is there will be one
influent flow spike.
If the individual load type is selected, the loading is determined by the amount
specified in the Individual Loads sub-menu. The stoichiometry is specified in the
Influent Characterization menu and the number of trucks per day is specified in
the Composition sub-menu (see Figure 5-15).

Influent Models 77
Figure 5-15 - Batch Input Menu - Flow Data Model Inputs
Influent Appendices
MODEL-DEPENDENT STATE AND COMPOSITE VARIABLES

When setting up your influent model, it is important that you realize what state
variables are used in each biological model. The following sections outline the
state variables used in the models in the different libraries.
Of similar importance is an understanding of how the composite variables are

calculated from the state variables. This is important because many of the
influent models go backwards (i.e. from the composite variables to the state
variables); hence, an understanding of these relationships will help if
debugging is necessary. Influent Advisor has been developed specifically to help
navigate the more complicated influent models. The following figures were
developed to help with this understanding.
The composite variable figures are copies of the figures presented in the
composite variables chapter of this Reference; however, they are repeated here
because of their importance to the influent model calculations.
CN and CNIP Libraries

This section contains one table and two figures which are to help you
understand how GPS-X has calculated the cnlib state variables, and what state
variables should be calculated depending on which biological model you are
using.

78 Influent Models
Table 5-1 - State Variables Used in Each Biological Model Included in CNLIB and
CNIPLIB
State Mantis ASM1 ASM3

Variable
si   
ss   
xi   
xs   
xu  
xsto 
xbh   
xba   
so   
snh   
snd  
xnd  
sno   
snn   
salk   
xii   

Influent Models 79
si
SCOD
fbod
SBOD5 SBODU ss
BOD5 BODU xs
COD
fbod xbh
XBOD5 XBODU
xba XCOD
icv-1
xsto
VSS
xu
xi
X Tota l
Suspended
XISS Solids
xii
Figure 5-16 - CN Library Organic State and Composite Variables

80 Influent Models

sno snh snd
Nitrogen fractions
xbh
si

Nitrogen fractions
xba
ss
XTKN xu
STKN
xi
TN TKN xnd xs
Figure 5-17 - CN Library Nitrogen State and Composite Variables
CN2 and CN2IP Libraries

This section contains one table and two figures which are to help you
understand how GPS-X has calculated the cn2lib state variables, and what state
using.
Table 5-2
State Variables Used in Each Biological Model Included in CN2LIB and CN2IPLIB
State Variable Mantis TwoStepMantis
si  
ss  
ssh 
xi  
xs  
xu  
xbh  
xbai  
xbaa 
so  
snh  
snd  
xnd  
snoi 
snoa  
sni 
xni 
snn  
salk  
xii  

Influent Models 81
si
ssh
SCOD
ss
fbod
XBOD5 SBODU
xs
BOD5 BODU COD
xbh
fbod
SBOD5 XBODU
xbai
XCOD
icv-1
xbaa
VSS
xu
X Tota l
Suspended
Solids
xi
XISS
xsto
3 3
xii xmeoh xpp xppr xmep
Figure 5-18 - CN2 Library Organic State and Composite Variables

82 Influent Models
snoa snoi sni snh snd
xu
SNO
xi
STKN
xni xnd

Nitrogen fractions
xbh
xbaa
TKN
XTKN xbai
TN
Figure 5-19 - CN2 Library Nitrogen State and Composite Variables
CNP and CNPIP Libraries

This section contains one table and three figures which are to help you
understand how GPS-X has calculated the cnplib state variables, and what state
using.
Table 5-3
State Variables Used in Each Biological Model included in CNPLIB and
CNPIPLIB
State Mantis ASM1 ASM2d ASM3 NewGeneral
Variable
si     
ss    
sf 
slf  
xi     
xs     
xu   
xbh     
xba     
xbp  
xbt  
xsto 
so     
Influent Models 83
sp  
xpp  
xppr 
snh     
snd   
xnd   
sno     
snn   
salk     
xmeoh 
xmep 
xii     

84 Influent Models
si
sf
slf SCOD
fbod ss
SBOD5 SBODU
xs
BOD5 BODU
COD
xbh
fbod
XBOD5 XBODU
xba
XCOD
xbp icv-1
xgly VSS
Total
xbt X Suspended
Solids
xsto XISS
3
xu 3
xi xii xmep xmeoh xpp xppr
Figure 5-20 - CNP Library Organic State and Composite Variables

Influent Models 85
snd sni xbh

sno snh ss si sf
xba

Nitrogen fractions
Nitrogen fractions
xbp
STKN XTKN
xi
xu
TN TKN xnd
xs
Figure 5-21 - CNP Library Nitrogen State and Composite Variables
sf
Phosphorus fractions
STP TP xpp
ss
xppr
sp
si XTP
0.205 xmep
Phosphorus fractions (depends on the model)
xi xs xu xbh xba xbp
Figure 5-22 - CNP Library Phosphorus State and Composite Variables

86 Influent Models
Influent objects in MANTIS2LIB

There are seven influent objects in MANTIS2LIB of GPS-X:
Table 5-4 - Influent Objects in MANTIS2LIB

Name Object Use Models Available
bodbased
codbased
Wastewater Continuous wastewater flows codstates
Influent (steady or dynamic) states
sludge
tssfrac
bodbased
codbased
Batch deliveries of septage or other codstates
Batch Influent
discontinuous wastewater flows states
sludge
tssfrac
COD
Dosage of COD chemicals into
Chemical
streams or objects codfeed
Dosage
Water Continuous water flows water

(steady or dynamic)
Acid Dosage acidfeed

Acid addition for pH control
Alkali Dosage alkalifeed

Alkali addition for pH control
Nutrient
nutrifeed
Dosage Nutrient addition
The seven influent objects contain models, options and features that are relevant to the
type of influent being used. For example the continuous wastewater model has options
for specifying a diurnal pattern for influent flow, a feature not found in the other influent

Influent Models 87
objects. The influent models in MANTIS2LIB are similar to influent models in other
libraries with a few differences.
WASTEWATER INFLUENT OBJECT

The flow rate setup in wastewater influent object is similar to the flow rate
setup in other libraries. The built-in influent advisor also works in a similar
way as for the other libraries. However, a few key differences are with respect
to how the stoichiometric parameters for composite variable calculations are
organized and calculated in this library. In MANTIS2LIB, the stoichiometric
parameters are accessed through the System > Input Parameters >Influent
Stoichiometry and System > Input Parameters >Global Fixed Stoichiometry menus
(Figure 5-23). The stoichiometric parameters available in Influent Stoichiometry
and Global Fixed Stoichiometry are shown in Figure 5-24 and Figure 5-25. The
stoichiometric parameters available in Influent Stoichiometry menu are the
parameters which are influent specific and representative of a composite
component of unknown composition. On the other hand, the stoichiometry
parameters available in the Global Fixed Stoichiometry are parameters which can
be calculated based on the chemical composition (acetic acid, methanol etc.) of
the component or some underlying fundamental estimation procedure. The
default values of inorganic fractions (N, P, etc.) in different type of biomass
may be accessed by pressing the More.. button on the Global Fixed Stoichiometry
menu (Figure 5-26).
Figure 5-23 - Accessing the Stoichiometry Parameters in MANTIS2LIB

88 Influent Models
Figure 5-24 - Influent Specific Stoichiometric Parameters
Figure 5-25 - Fixed Stoichiometric Parameters in MANTIS2LIB
Figure 5-26 - More Fixed Stoichiometric Parameters in MANTIS2LIB
BATCH INFLUENT OBJECT

The batch influent object in MANTIS2LIB is similar to the batch influent
object in other libraries.
WATER INFLUENT OBJECT

The water influent object is similar to the batch influent object in other
libraries.
Influent Models 89
COD CHEMICAL DOSAGE OBJECT

The COD chemical dosage object uses the codfeed model (Figure 5-27). The
COD chemical dosage object allows user to select the type of COD used in the
feed. Three COD sources acetic acid, propionic acid and methanol are available
for selection from the Composition > Feed Chemical Details menu (Figure 5-28).
The Feed Chemical Details menu is as shown in
Figure 5-29. For the selected chemical, two input parameters of % purity and
density of chemical solution at the selected %-purity are required. Depending
on the chemical selection, the concentration of the corresponding state variable
is set. For example, if acetic acid is selected, the concentration of acetate (sac)
is set to the value determined by the set % purity and density of the chemical
solution.
Figure 5-27 - Models in COD Chemical Dosage Influent Object
Figure 5-28 - Accessing Feed Chemical Details Menu

90 Influent Models
Figure 5-29 - Selection of Feed Chemical and Setup of Chemical Properties
The COD chemical dosage object has a built-in flow rate controller. The
controller is useful for controlling the feed rate of COD based on a user defined
controlled variable.
ACID DOSAGE OBJECT

The acid dosage object is only available in the MANTIS2LIB. The acid dosage
object uses the acidfeed model (Figure 5-30). The acid dosage object allows
user to select the type of acid used in the feed. Three acids HCl, H2SO4 and
HNO3 are available for selection from the Composition > Feed Chemical Details
menu (Figure 5-31). The Feed Chemical Details menu is as shown in Figure 5-32.
For the selected chemical, two input parameters of % purity and density of
chemical solution at the selected %-purity are required. If HCl or H2SO4 is
selected, the state variable of other anion (sana) is set to the equivalent dosed
amount. If HNO3 is the selected acid then, the state variable of Nitrate-N (snoa)
is set to an equivalent concentration.
Figure 5-30 - Models in Acid Dosage Influent Object

Influent Models 91

The acid dosage object has a built-in flow rate controller. The controller is
useful for controlling the feed rate of acid based on a control variable (e.g. pH)
in a reactor of interest.
ALKALI DOSAGE OBJECT

The alkali dosage object is only available in the MANTIS2LIB. The alkali
dosage object uses the alkalifeed model (Figure 5-33). The alkali dosage object
allows user to select the type of alkali (base) used in the feed. Six alkalis
NaOH, Ca(OH)2, Mg(OH)2, NaHCO3, CaCO3 and Na2CO3 are available for
selection from the Composition > Feed Chemical Details menu (Figure 5-34). The
Feed Chemical Details menu is as shown in Figure 5-35. For the selected
chemical, two input parameters of % purity and density of chemical solution at
the selected %-purity are required. The chemical and corresponding state
variables which are set in the feed are shown in Table 5-5.
Figure 5-33 Models in Alkali Dosage Influent Object

92 Influent Models
Table 5-5 - Alkali Chemicals and Affected States in the Feed

Chemical Affected States in
Feed
NaOH, sana
Ca(OH)2, sca
Mg(OH)2, smg
NaHCO3 sana, stic
CaCO3 sca, stic
Na2CO3 sana, stic
The alkali dosage object has a built-in flow rate controller. The controller is
useful for controlling the feed rate of alkali based on a control variable (e.g.
pH) in a reactor of interest.
NUTRIENT DOSAGE OBJECT

The nutrient dosage object is only available in the MANTIS2LIB. The nutrient
dosage object uses the nutrifeed model (Figure 5-36). The nutrient dosage object
allows user to select the type of nutrient used in the feed. Four nutrients NH4Cl,
Urea, (NH4)3PO4 and H3PO4 are available for selection from the Composition >
Influent Models 93
Feed Chemical Details menu (Figure 5-37). The Feed Chemical Details menu is as
shown in Figure 5-38. For the selected chemical, two input parameters of %
purity and density of chemical solution at the selected %-purity are required.
The chemical and corresponding state variables which are set in the feed are
shown in Table 5-3.
Figure 5-36 - Models in Nutrient Dosage Influent Object
Table 5-6 Nutrient Chemicals and Affected States in the Feed

Chemical Affected States in Feed
NH4Cl snh, sana
Urea snd

94 Influent Models
(NH4)3PO4 snh, sp
H3PO4 sp
The nutrient dosage object has a built-in flow rate controller. The controller is
useful for controlling the feed rate of nutrient for a user defined control
variable.

Suspended-Growth Models 95
CHAPTER 6
Suspended-Growth Models
Introduction
This chapter examines the suspended-growth models that are available in the different
GPS-X libraries. Each of the biological models available in GPS-X is implemented in
both the completely mixed and plug-flow formats in many different unit process objects.
The biological model is the same, however, regardless of the hydraulic implementation.
Before discussing specific models, some common features are presented.
Common Features
MODELLING OF OXYGEN TRANSFER

The oxygen transfer model is based on theory presented in the USEPA Design
Manual for Fine Pore Aeration Systems (USEPA, 1989) and Mueller et al.
(2002). The GPS-X aeration model is suitable for accurate design of diffused
and surface mechanical aeration systems.
In GPS-X, oxygen transfer to the bulk liquid phase of a biological reactor is

modelled using a dynamic mass balance written for dissolved oxygen gas. For
example, a dissolved oxygen mass balance around a completely stirred tank
reactor (CSTR) is shown below in Equation 6.1.
V
dC L
dt
( )
= QCin − QC L + K L a C∞* − C L V + rV
(6.1)
where:
V = reactor volume (m3)
CL = concentration of dissolved oxygen (DO) in the reactor (mg/L)
Q = influent flow rate (m3/d)

96 Suspended-Growth Models
Cin = concentration of DO entering reactor (mg/L)
KLa = oxygen mass transfer coefficient at field conditions (1/day)
C ∞* = DO saturation concentration at field conditions (mg/L)
r = rate of use of DO by biomass (g/day), the respiration rate
The volume, flows, and reaction rates are known from specifications or other
modelling equations leaving two terms that must be calculated in order to solve
the dissolved oxygen mass balance over time for the DO concentration in the
reactor, CL:
1. DO saturation concentration at field conditions, C ∞* , and
2. Oxygen mass transfer coefficient at field conditions, KLa.
Calculation of DO Saturation Concentration at Field Conditions

The DO saturation concentration at field conditions is calculated as follows:
C ∞* = τ × β × Ω × C ∞* 20 (6.2)
where:
τ = temperature correction factor (unitless)

β = correction factor for salts, particulates, and surface-active substances
(unitless)
Ω = pressure correction factor (unitless)
C∞* 20 = DO saturation concentration at 20 oC and 1 atm (mg/L)
The correction factors are used to adjust the DO saturation concentration to

account for the temperature of the liquid, the pressure at the submergence level
of the diffusers, and the salts, precipitates, and surface-active substances found
in the wastewater.
The temperature correction factor is calculated as follows:
C st* (6.3)
τ= *
C s 20
where:

C st* = surface DO saturation concentration at temperature of t and 1 atm (mg/L)
C s*20 = surface DO saturation concentration at 20 oC and 1 atm (mg/L)
The surface DO saturation concentration at liquid temperature t and a pressure

of 1 atm is obtained using a lookup table in GPS-X that is based on
temperature. The lookup table data were taken from Appendix C of the
USEPA Design Manual – Fine Pore Aeration Systems (USEPA, 1989). When
the temperature falls between two data points in the table, GPS-X uses linear
interpolation to determine the C st* value. The value of C s*20 is 9.09 mg/L.
The correction factor for salts, particulates, and surface-active substances, β , is

a parameter that must be measured or estimated for the wastewater of interest.
In GPS-X, a default value of 0.95 is used.
The pressure correction factor is calculated as shown below:
Pb + p de − pv (6.4)
Ω=
Ps + p de − pv
where:
Pb = barometric pressure at elevation and air temperature (kPa)

Ps = standard barometric pressure (101.325 kPa)
pv = vapour pressure of water at liquid temperature (kPa)
pde = effective pressure at depth of diffuser submergence (kPa)
The barometric pressure at elevation and air temperature is calculated using the
following formula taken from Appendix B-2 of Metcalf and Eddy (2003):
 gM (z b − z s ) (6.5)
Pb = exp −  Ps
 RTair 
where:
g = acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s2)

M = molecular weight of air (28.964 kg/kg-mole)
R = universal gas constant (8314 N·m/kg-mole·K)
Tair = air temperature (K)

zi = elevation at position i (m)
The vapour pressure of water at the liquid temperature is determined using the
Antoine equation (Felder and Rousseau, 1986):
B (6.6)
log10 pv = A −
T +C
where:
A, B, C = Antoine coefficients (found in System > Input Parameters > Physical form
in GPS-X under Physical Constants )
T = wastewater temperature (oC)
The effective pressure at the depth of diffuser submergence is calculated using

the following formula:
p de = (δ − 1)(Ps − pv ) (6.7)
where δ is the depth correction factor for oxygen saturation and is given by
Fine Pore and Jets
δ = 1+ 0.03858(d ) (6.8)
Coarse Bubble
δ = 0.99 + 0.0291(d ) (6.9)
The parameter d is the depth of submergence of the diffusers.
The DO saturation concentration at 20 oC and 1 atm is calculated as follows:
(
C∞* 20 = δ C s*20 ) (6.10)
Oxygen Mass Transfer Coefficient at Field Conditions Calculation

The value of the oxygen mass transfer coefficient at field conditions, KLa,
specifies the amount of oxygen supplied to the aeration tank given the driving
( )
force, C∞* − C L , and the tank volume. GPS-X provides four ways for the user
to specify the KLa:
1. If known, the user can directly supply the KLa at 20 oC (no alpha,
fouling, or temperature correction) for both diffused and mechanical
aeration. GPS-X converts the KLa to field conditions.

2. In the case of mechanical aerators, the user can supply an aeration

power and mechanical aerator oxygen transfer rate from which the
GPS-X calculates the KLa.
3. In the case of diffused aeration, the user can supply an air flow rate (at
either standard or field conditions) and a standard oxygen transfer
efficiency (SOTE) from which GPS-X calculates the KLa at field
conditions.
4. Alternatively, the user can configure a DO controller which will
manipulate the field KLa directly to match the desired DO
concentration.
The availability of these options depends on the selected aeration method. For
diffused aeration the user can enter airflow, enter KLa, or use a DO controller.
For mechanical aeration the user can enter power, enter KLa, or use a DO
controller. The four choices for specifying KLa are discussed in more detail in
the following four sections.
Entering K L a Directly – Diffused Aeration

The KLa at field conditions is calculated using Equation 6.11.
K L aT = (αF )θ (T −20 ) K L a20 (6.11)
where:
K L aT = mass transfer coefficient at temperature T in oC (1/day)

K L a 20 = mass transfer coefficient at 20 oC
θ = temperature correction factor (default value in GPS-X is 1.024)
α = wastewater correction factor for K L a 20
F = diffuser fouling factor (default value in GPS-X is 1.0)
The α correction factor can be specified along the length of the aeration tank in
the case of a plug flow unit process.
GPS-X calculates other useful process variables from the standard and field
KLa as detailed below:
Oxygen Transfer Rate (OTR) at Field Conditions in g/d
(
OTR = K L aT C∞* − C L V ) (6.12)

Standard Oxygen Transfer Rate (SOTR) in g/d
SOTR = K L a20 C∞* 20 V ( ) (6.13)
Airflow at Standard Conditions in m3/d
SOTR (6.14)
Gs =
SOTE × CF1
where:
SOTE = standard oxygen transfer efficiency (as a fraction)
CF1 = conversion factor to account for the density, molcular weight, and O2
mole fraction of the standard air (U.S. Standard = 277.6533841;
European Standard = 300.495893)
In the case of user-defined standard air (see Entering Airflow section below),
the airflow is calculated using Equation 6.15.
SOTR (6.15)
Gs =
ρ user
SOTE × molfrO2 × MWO2 ×
MWuser
where:
molfrO2 = mole fraction of O2 in user-defined air (mole/mole)
MWO2 = molecular weight of O2 (32 g/mole)
ρ user = density of user-defined air (g/m3)

MWuser = average molecular weight of user-defined air (g/mole)
The airflow at either U.S. or European standard conditions is converted to field

conditions using the ideal gas law:
Gs , field =
(T field + 273.15)
×
Ps
× Gs
(6.16)
(Ts tan dard + 273.15) Pb
where:
Tstandard = air temperature at standard conditions (oC)

Tfield = air temperature at field conditions (oC)
Equation 6.16 assumes that the field air has the same humidity as the standard
air. If the humidity of the field air is different than for the standard air, the user
can multiply the GPS-X calculated field air by the ratio of the mole fraction of
oxygen in the field air by the mole fraction of air in the standard air.
No conversion to field conditions is undertaken for user-defined standard air.
Entering K L a Directly – Mechanical Aeration

Mechanical surface aeration is calculated similarly to diffused; however, the
fouling and depth correction factors are not required and oxygen transfer is
related to the mechanical power input.
For mechanical surface aeration, the formula for the DO saturation

concentration at field conditions is modified as follows:
C∞* ,mechanical = τ × β × Ω × Cs*20 (6.17)
as δ = 1 in this case. The pressure correction factor is re-defined as:
Pb − pv (6.18)
Ω=
Ps − pv
K L aT = αθ (T −20 ) K L a20 (6.19)
The OTR is calculated using Equation 6.20 as shown below:
(
OTR = K L aT C∞* ,mechanical − C L V ) (6.20)
The SOTR is calculated as follows:
K L aT (6.21)
SOTR = × C s*20V
αθ T − 20
The mechanical power is calculated using the SOTR:
SOTR (6.22)
Pmechanical =
η × CF2

where:
Pmechanical = mechanical power (kW)

η = mechanical aerator oxygen transfer rate (1.75 kg O2/kW·h)
CF2 = conversion factor (24,000)
The default α value for mechanical aeration in GPS-X is 0.9.
Entering Airflow
The airflow can be entered at either standard or field conditions. At standard
conditions the user has 3 options:
• U.S. Standard Conditions:

• Temperature = 20 oC
• Pressure =1 atm
• Relative humidity = 36 %
• European Standard Conditions:
• Temperature = 0 oC
• Pressure = 1 atm
• Relative humidity = 0 %
• User-Defined Standard Conditions: The user must specify the properties
(mole fraction of O2 in air, density, molecular weight, and exponent in
blower power equation). When using the user-defined standard
conditions option, GPS-X uses a Henry’s law correction to adjust the
value of C st*
molfrO2
C st* = × C st*
0.2095 (6.23)
GPS-X converts the airflow to U.S. standard conditions and then calculates the
SOTR using Equation 6.13. The OTR is calculated using Equation 6.24.
OTR =
SOTR (αF )θ T −20 C∞* − C L ( ) (6.24)
C∞* 20
The oxygen mass transfer coefficient at field conditions is calculated using

Equation 6.11. If the airflow is entered at U.S. or European standard
conditions, the airflow at field conditions is calculated using Equation 6.16.
Entering Mechanical Power

If mechanical power is entered, the SOTR in g/d is calculated using Equation
6.21. The KLa at field conditions is then calculated using Equation 6.19 and
the OTR is calculated using Equation 6.20.
DO Control
The user has the option of controlling the aeration supply to the reactor to
maintain a specific dissolved oxygen setpoint. In this case the model will
calculate the necessary oxygen mass transfer coefficient at field conditions to
maintain the DO at the setpoint.
For diffused aeration with DO control, GPS-X uses Equations 6.12 to 6.14 to
calculate the SOTR, OTR, and airflow. For mechanical aeration with DO
control, GPS-X uses Equations 6.20, 6.21, and 6.22 to calculate the OTR,
SOTR, and mechanical power.
Standard Oxygen Transfer Efficiency (SOTE)

The user has the option of using a constant SOTE or using a correlation in
GPS-X to calculate the SOTE. When using the constant SOTE option, the
default value (0.3) represents a typical estimate of the efficiency for fine bubble
diffusers submerged at 4.3 m (14 ft).
Alternatively, GPS-X has SOTE correlations for fine bubble, coarse bubble,
and jet diffusers. For fine bubble aeration, the SOTE correlations are based on
a regression equation developed by Hur (1994) which is shown below:
Fine Bubble SOTE

SOTE = A1 + A2 × AF + A3 × AF 2 + A4 × d + A5 × DD (6.25)
where:
AF = air flow per diffuser (scfm per diffuser)

d = diffuser submergence (ft)
DD = diffuser density (diffusers/100ft2)
A1, A2, A3, A4, and A5 = regression parameters
As shown, this equation depends on the depth of submergence of the diffusers,

the diffuser density, and the airflow per diffuser. Using this equation and the
data found in Hur (1994), Hydromantis re-estimated the regression parameters
to improve the fit of the regression. Separate regressions were performed for
ceramic disc, ceramic dome, membrane disc, and membrane tube diffusers.

The values of the regression coefficients can be found in the System > Input
Parameters > Physical > More form.
There is also an option to use a user-defined SOTE correlation. The correlation

has the same form as Equation 6.25. The adjustable regression coefficients are
found in the Input Parameters > Operational > More form of most biological
objects.
A separate correlation for coarse bubble and jet diffusers has been developed
by Hydromantis based on data found in Mueller et al. (2002) as shown in
Equation 6.26:
Coarse Bubble and Jet SOTE

SOTE = A1 + A2 × AF + A3 × AF 2 + A4 × d + A5 × d 2 (6.26)
As shown, the SOTE for coarse bubble and jet diffusers is dependent upon the
airflow per diffuser and the diffuser submergence.
In all the SOTE correlations, the airflow per diffuser is been limited to be
within the ranges used for calibration. The correlations are empirical and
should not be extrapolated outside of the calibration range. The ranges used are
as follows:
Fine Bubble
Ceramic Disc: 0.5 ≤ AF ≤ 5 m3/h/diffuser
Ceramic Dome: 0.5 ≤ AF ≤ 4.4 m3/h/diffuser
Membrane Disc: 0.8 ≤ AF ≤ 5 m3/h/diffuser
Membrane Tube: 0.8 ≤ AF ≤ 15 m3/h/diffuser
Coarse Bubble
14 ≤ AF ≤ 58 m3/h/diffuser
Jet
8 ≤ AF ≤ 140 m3/h/diffuser
GPS-X prints a warning message to the log window if the airflow per diffuser
is outside the ranges given above.

SOTE in Deep Tanks

The fine bubble SOTE correlation is modified for tanks deeper than 8 m. Work
by Pöpel and Wagner (1994) has shown that the SOTE does not continue to
increase linearly with the depth of submergence beyond depths of
approximately 8 m (see Figure 8 in Pöpel and Wagner (1994)). At depths
greater than 8 m the SOTE starts to level off so that the SOTE can never be
greater than 100 %.
An extra quardatic term in diffuser submergence is added to Equation 6.25

when the diffuser submergence is greater than 8 m as shown in Equation 6.27.
SOTE = A1 + A2 × AF + A3 × AF 2 + A4 × d + A6 × d 2 + A5 × DD (6.27)
The regression parameter A6 can be accessed in GPS-X in the Input Parameters >
Operational > More form. The parameter A6 was estimated by Hydromantis using
linear regression to fit Equation 6.26 to the solid curve in Figure 8 of Pöpel and
Wagner (1994). In order to perform the regression it was necessary to first
adjust the airflow per diffuser and the diffuser density to match the SOTE of 20
% at depth of 5 m shown in Figure 8 of Pöpel and Wagner (1994).
The deep tank SOTE correction is only applied for fine bubble diffusers. It can
be turned off by setting the parameter A6 to zero in GPS-X.
Blower Wire Power

The wire power in kW consumed by the blowers in order to deliver the
required air is calculated in GPS-X as follows:
DP (6.28)
WP =
e
where:
DP = delivered power of blowers (kW)

e = overall efficiency of mechanical equipment (i.e. blowers, motors, coupling,
and gear box)
The overall efficency of the mechanical equipment is entered in GPS-X in the

Input Parameters > Operating Cost form of most biological objects. The delivered
power of the blowers is calculated using the adiabatic compression equation
(Mueller et al., 2002):

wRTa  P 
K
 (6.29)
DP =  d  − 1
K  Pa  
where:
w = mass flow rate of air

R = universal gas constant
Ta = blower inlet air temperature (degrees K)
K = R/Cp where Cp is the heat capacity of air at constant pressure (K = 0.283
for U.S. Standard Air and K = 0.2857 for European Standard Air)
Pd = absolute pressure downstream of blower (discharge pressure in kPa)
Pa = absolute pressure upstream of blower (inlet pressure in kPa)
The discharge pressure of the blower is calculated as follows:
Pd = Ps + g × d + ∆pd (6.30)
where:
Ps = barometric pressure (default is 101.325 kPa)

∆pd = pressure drop in piping and diffuser downstream of blower (found in

Input Parameters > Operating Cost form of most biological objects)
The inlet pressure is calculated as shown in Equation 6.31:
Pa = Ps − ∆pa (6.31)
where:
∆p a = pressure drop in inlet filters and piping to blower (found in Input

Parameters > Operating Cost form of most biological objects)
SUMMARY OF AERATION INPUT PARAMETERS

This section discusses the aeration forms that are applicable to most biological
objects. The forms from the Completely-Mixed Tank are used as an example.

Aeration Setup Form

The Aeration Setup form is accessed by right-clicking on most biological objects
and selecting Input Parameters > Operational . Figure 6-1 shows the GPS-X form.
The parameters are discussed below:
Aeration method (Diffused Air/Mechanical (Surface Aeration)): Specifies the whether
the aeration system is diffused or mechanical (surface).
Specify oxygen transfer by … (Entering Airflow/2 Entering KLa/3 Entering Mechanical

Power/4 Using a DO Controller): Specifies the method of oxygen transfer:
entering airflow, KLa, mechanical power, or using a DO controller. Entries
that do not apply are greyed out. For example you cannot specify the oxygen
transfer by entering mechanical power if the aeration method is diffused.
Oxygen mass transfer coefficient (clean water): Clean water KLa at 20 oC with no
alpha or fouling factor correction.
Aeration power: The power of the mechanical aeration system.
Diffused air flow into the aeration tank. The airflow

Air flow into aeration tank:
can be at standard conditions (U.S., European, or User-Defined) or at field
conditions depending on user selections. The user can select standard or field
conditions in the Input Parameters > Operational > More … form. The user can
select which standard conditions are used in the Input Parameters > Physical >
More … if local conditions for O2 solubility are used or in the System > Input
Parameters > Physical form if global conditions for O2 solubility are used.

Figure 6-1 Aeration Setup Form in Operational Form
By clicking on the More … button the form shown in Figure 6-2 and Figure 6-3
can be accessed. The parameters found in this form are discussed in the
subsequent sections.
Figure 6-2 - General Aeration Setup > More … Form

Figure 6-3 - Diffused Aeration Setup > More … Form (Part 1)

Figure 6-4 - Diffused Aeration Setup > More … Form (Part 2)
General Sub-Section (Under More …)

Beta factor (for DO saturation): Specifies the DO saturation concentration
correction factor for salts, particulates, and surface-active substances. The
defauilt value is 0.95.
Temperature coefficient for KLa: Specifies the temperature correction factor for
KLa, θ (default value is 1.024).
KLa Sub-Section (Under More …)

Specifies the minimum value of the
Minimum oxygen mass transfer coefficient:
KLa at field conditions. GPS-X bounds the field KLa to be greater than or
equal to this minimum in all cases.
Specifies the maximum value of the
Maximum oxygen mass transfer coefficient:
KLa at field conditions. GPS-X bounds the field KLa to be less than or equal
to this maximum in all cases.

Mechanical (Surface Aeration) Sub-Section (Under More …)

Specifies the mass of oxygen transferred
Mechanical aerator oxygen transfer rate:
to the liquid per unit of energy used by the mechanical aerator.
Alpha factor (mechanical aeration): wastewater correction factor for mechanical
KLa. The default value is 0.9.
Diffused Air Sub-Section (Under More …)

Allows user to specify
Input air flow at... (Field Conditions/Standard Conditions):
whether the diffused air flow is entered at standard conditions or field
conditions. The user can select which standard conditions are used in the
Input Parameters > Physical > More … if local conditions for O2 solubility are
used or in the System > Input Parameters > Physical form if global conditions for
O2 solubility are used.
Specifies the type of
Diffuser type (Fine Bubble/Coarse Bubble/Jet/User-Defined):
diffuser to be used. This option is only active if diffused air has been
selected. GPS-X uses this selection to select the appropriate alpha value and
to select the appropriate SOTE correlation (if applicable).
Specifies the value of the wastewater correction factor
Alpha factor (fine bubble):
for the fine bubble KLa. The default value is 0.6.
Alpha factor (coarse bubble):Specifies the value of the wastewater correction
factor for the coarse bubble KLa. The default value is 0.8.
Specifies the value of the wastewater correction factor for the
Alpha factor (jet):
jet KLa. The default value is 0.85.
Alpha factor (user-defined):Specifies the value of the wastewater correction
factor for the user-defined KLa. The default value is 0.6.
Fouling constant: Diffuser fouling factor. Default value is 1 (i.e. no fouling).
When
Depth correction factor for user-defined diffuser (Fine Bubble/Course Bubble):
the user-defined diffuser type is being used, this parameter selects whether
Equation 6.8 or Equation 6.9 is used to calculate the depth correction factor
for the DO saturation concentration.
Standard Oxygen Transfer Efficiency (SOTE) Sub-Section (Under

More …)
Specifies whether the SOTE is set by the user
SOTE type (Constant/Correlation):
or calculated by a correlation. The correlation used depends on the diffuser
type selected.
Standard oxygen transfer efficiency: When the SOTE type is set to constant, this
value is used for the SOTE.
Diffuser submergence: Specifies the depth of submergence of the diffusers.

Method of specifying diffuser setup (Enter Number of Diffusers/Enter Diffuser Density):

Allows the user to either specify the number of diffusers or the diffuser
density (diffuser area/tank area). It is important to enter the diffuser density
or the number of diffusers if an SOTE correlation is being used or the user
requires GPS-X to display accurate values of the airflow per diffuser and the
number of diffusers per unit area.
When the method of specifying the
Diffuser density (diffuser area/tank area):
diffuser setup has been selected as diffuser density, this parameter allows the
user to enter the diffuser density as a fraction or a percentage. Diffuser
densities between 5 % and 25 % are typical.
Number of diffusers or jets: When the method of specifying the diffuser setup
has been selected as enter number of diffusers, this parameter allows the user
to enter the number of diffusers.
The area of the tank floor. It is important to enter the tank foor
Tank floor area:
area if an SOTE correlation is being used or the user requires GPS-X to
display an accurate value of the number of diffusers per unit area.
The floor area taken up by a diffuser. It is important to enter
Area per diffuser:
the area per diffuser if an SOTE correlation is being used and the user is
entering the diffuser density. The default value is 0.038 m2 which is typical
for a 9″ diameter ceramic diffuser.
Fine bubble diffuser head type (Ceramic Disc/Ceramic Dome/Membrane Disc/
Membrane Tube): Used to specify the fine bubble diffuser head type when fine
bubble diffused aeration has been specified and an SOTE correlation is being
used.
User-Defined SOTE Regression Coefficients Sub-Section (Under

More …)
SOTE regression constant A1 (user-defined): Regression parameter A1 in user-
defined SOTE correlation.

Deep Tank User-Defined SOTE Regression Coefficient (Under

More…)
Regression parameter for
Deep Tank SOTE regression constant A6 (user-defined):
the deep tank SOTE term in the user-defined SOTE correlation.
Physical Form – Local Conditions for O 2 Solubility (Under More …)

When local conditions are being used for oxygen solubility, the physical data
related to the aeration model is accessed by right-clicking on most biological
objects and selecting Input Parameters > Physical > More …. The available
parameters are shown in Figure 6-4 and are detailed below.
Figure 6-4 - Physical > More … Form Within an Object
Local Environment Selection Sub-Section

Use local settings for O2 solubility and biological activity (ON – OFF): Selects
whether local or global conditions are used for oxygen solubility.
Oxygen Solubility (if individual settings are used) Sub-Section

Liquid temperature: Allows the user to specify the local wasewater temperature.
Blower inlet air temperature: Allows user to specify the inlet air temperature for
the blowers.
Elevation above sea level: Specifies the elevation above sea level.

Standard air conditions (U.S. (air temp 20C, 36% humidity)/European (air temp 0C, 0%
humidity)/User-Defined): If the aeration method is diffused, this switch selects
which standard conditions are used to calculate the standard air flow used
within GPS-X and displayed as an output. If user-defined standard air is
slected the user must enter the properties of their air in the Properties of User-
Defined Air sub-section. The user-defined air option provides the user with a
method of specifying pure oxygen.
Properterties of User-Defined Air Sub-Section

Mole fraction of oxygen in user-defined air: When user-defined standard air has
been selected, this parameter specifies the oxygen mole fraction of the user-
defined air. The default value is 1 which is consistent with pure oxygen.
When user-defined standard air has been selected,
Density of user-defined air:
this parameter specifies the density of the user-defined air. The default value
is 1,429 mg/L which is consistent with pure oxygen.
Molecular weight of user-defined air: When user-defined standard air has been
selected, this parameter specifies the molecular weight of the user-defined air.
The default value is 32 g/mole, which is consistent with pure oxygen.
Exponent in blower power equation: When user-defined standard air has been
selected, this parameter specifies the value of exponent K in Equation 6.28 for
the user-defined air. The default value is 0.284, which is consistent with pure
oxygen.
Physical Form – Layout-Wide Settings

When global conditions are being used for oxygen solubility or it is necessary
to change global physical constants important to aeration, the relevent
physical data is accessed by selecting System > Input Parameters > Physical . The
available parameters are shown in Figure 6-5 and are detailed below.
Oxygen Solubility (layout-wide settings) Sub-Section

Most of the parameters in this sub-section of the layout-wide physical form
are duplicates of the local versions discussed earlier. The one exception is as
follows:
Barometric pressure at sea level: Specifies the pressure at sea level. The default
value is 101.325 kPa.
Physical Constants Sub-Section

Molecular weight of air (@ U.S. Standard Conditions): Specifies the molecular
weight of air at U.S. Standard Conditions which is used in Equation 6.5 to
calculate the barometric pressure at the elevation and air temperature
specified. GPS-X does its internal calculations in U.S. Standard Conditions.
Gas constant: Specifies the value of the universal gas constant.
Coefficient A in the Antoine equation which is used to

Antoine coefficient A1:
calculate the vapour pressure of water at a given water temperature.
Coefficient B in the Antoine equation which is used to
Coefficient C in the Antoine equation which is used to
Properterties of User-Defined Air Sub-Section

The parameters in this sub-section of the layout-wide physical form are
duplicates of the local versions discussed earlier.
SOTE Regression Coefficients Sub-Section

In this sub-section the user can specify the regression coefficients used in the
available SOTE correlations.
Figure 6-5 Physical Form (Layout-Wide Settings)

Blower Cost Sub-Section (Operating Cost Form)

The blower cost sub-section can be accessed by right-clicking on most
biological objects and selecting Input Parameters > Operating Cost . The GPS-X
form is shown in Figure 6-6. The available parameters are described below.
Combined blower/motor efficiency: Specifies the overall efficiency of the
mechanical aeration equipment (i.e. blowers, motors, coupling, and gear box).
The default value is 0.7 or 70 % efficiency.
Specifies the pressure drop in the
Pressure drop in inlet filters and piping to blower:
inlet filters and piping to the blowers for the purposes of calculating the wire
power supplied to the mechanical aeration equipment. The default value is 1
kPa.
Specifies the pressure
Pressure drop in piping and diffuser downstream of blower:
drop in the piping and diffusers downstream of the blowers for the purposes
of calculating the wire power supplied to the mechanical aeration equipment.
The default value is 7 kPa.
Figure 6-6 - Blower Cost Form
AERATION OUTPUT VARIABLES

The aeration output variables can be accessed by right-clicking on most
biological objects and selecting Output Variables > Oxygen Transfer . For single
tank objects, the same form can be accessed by right-clicking on the overflow
stream. For muli-tank objects such as the plugflow tank, the total airflow,
SOTR, OTR, and mechanical power can be accessed by right-clicking on the
overflow stream and selecting Total Air Flow , Total Oxygen Transfer , or Total
Mechanical Power .

The output variables associated with the blower calculations can be accessed
by right-clicking on the object (single tank objects only) or the overflow
stream and selecting Output Variables > Operating Cost .
MBR Aeration Model

In the Membrane Bioreactor and Completely-Mixed MBR objects the biological air
and cross-flow air in the membrane tanks are tracked separately. The
biological air is handled similarly as in the other objects in GPS-X with the
exception that surface mechanical aeration is not an available option.
The cross-flow air is assumed to be delivered using a coarse bubble aeration
system. The user can enter the following variables for the cross-flow air: air
flow, alpha, and SOTE. The cross-flow air is assumed to be at the conditions
specified for the biological air (i.e. Standard or Field ). Unlike other objects in
GPS-X, the user can specify whether the air is at standard or field conditions
even if the user is not entering the biological airflow. GPS-X tracks the
biological and cross-flow air separately but also calculates the total air flow,
SOTR, and OTR delivered to the tank.
In the MBR objects, higher default alpha values are used to reflect the high
MLSS concentrations typically found in MBRs.
Activated Sludge Biological Models
STATE VARIABLES
A few comments about the state variables used in each of these models is
required. For all the models, the symbolic name of the state variables is
prefixed with either an X for particulate component, S for soluble component,
or in some cases a G for gaseous component. This designation follows the IWA
(Henze et al., 1987a) convention but is somewhat arbitrary because some
soluble and particulate components are colloidal and will pass through a
0.45µm filter but still be classified as part of a particulate component. For
example the slowly biodegradable material, designated Xs, may include soluble
and/or colloidal material. This approach greatly facilitates the model
development; however it invariably introduces some error into the models. The
issues of wastewater characterization are important and the modeller should
refer to the papers listed with the individual models discussed below.
MODEL MATRIX
Most biological process models now follow a standard matrix format. An
example of this format is shown in

Table 6-1
Table 6-1 Example Model Matrix (Wentzel et al., 1987a)
Component → i 1 2 3 Process Rate, ρj

XB SS SO [ML-3T -1]
j Process
1 1− Y µ̂S s
1 Growth 1 − − XB
Y Y K S + SS
2 Decay -1 -1 bXB
Observed Conversion ri ∑ rij = ∑ vijρ j

Rates (ML -3T -1) j j Kinetic Parameters:
Stoichiometric Oxygen (Negative Maximum specific
Parameters: growth rate: µ
[M(COD)L-3]
[M(COD)L-3]
[M(COD)L-3]
Substrate
True growth yield: Half-velocity

Biomass
COD)
Y Constant: KS
Specific decay rate: b
In this table, the components or state variables of the Monod-Herbert model

(Herbert, 1958), designated by a variable with a subscript i, are numbered and
listed across the top. Three state variables are defined (Xb, SS and So), each
having its own column. Names and units for each state variable are provided in
the bottom row of each of these columns. The important processes, designated
pj, in the system, which result in changes in the state variables, are shown in
separate rows, the actual process rate (kinetic expression or rate equation) is
shown in the rightmost column of each of these rows. All the necessary kinetic
parameters are defined in the lower right-hand corner of the table.
The entries within the table are the stoichiometric parameters or relations,
designated vij, used in defining the net process rate for a component. These
parameters define the mass relationships between components and are defined
in the lower-left hand corner of the table. If a process does not directly affect a
component's rate, then the table cell will be empty (the entry is assumed to be
zero in this case).

The net reaction rate of a component, designated ri, is the sum of all the
process rates, which cause a change in the mass of that component. The
expression used to determine the net rate is listed in the table in the row labeled
"Observed Conversion Rates". When the model is presented in matrix format,
this equation has a simple visual interpretation. To determine the net rate of
change for a component, first identify the column of the component of interest
and move down that column until you find a table cell containing an entry.
Multiply the table cell entry by the process rate shown in the rightmost column.
The sum of these individual process rates is the net reaction rate. Do likewise
for all remaining rows in the column, which contain stoichiometric parameters.
STOICHIOMETRIC PARAMETERS
Two common stoichiometric parameters appearing in the biological models in
this chapter are derived from their respective chemical equations. First is the
nitrogen to oxygen stoichiometric parameter used in the denitrification
equation. A value of 2.86 is used throughout the GPS-X libraries for all the
biological models. This value is derived from the molecular ratios shown in the
equation below:
−
4 NO3 + 2 H 2 O → 2 Ν 2 + 5O2 + 4OH −
The ratio of mass oxygen produced per mass nitrogen gas produced is 160:56
or 2.86:1. Similarly, the stoichiometric ratio of oxygen to nitrogen required for
nitrification (used in many of the biological models) has a value of 4.57 which
is derived from the molecular ratios shown in the equation below:
−
NH +4+2O2 → NO3 + H 2 O + + 2 H +
The ratio of mass of oxygen to mass of nitrogen is 64:14 or 4.57:1.
Since these stoichiometric ratios cannot change, the values are hard-coded in
GPS-X without user access. Other similar stoichiometric ratios are used in the
CN2 and CN2IP libraries, since they consider partial ammonia oxidation to
nitrite as well as complete ammonia oxidation to nitrate.
Activated Sludge Model No. 1 (ASM1)
INTRODUCTION
The International Association on Water Pollution Research and Control
(IAWPRC) Task Group realized that due to the long solids retention times and
low growth rates of the bacteria, the actual effluent substrate concentrations
between different activated sludge treatment plants did not vary greatly. What
was significantly different were the levels of MLSS and electron acceptor

(oxygen or nitrate). Thus the focus of the Activated Sludge Model No. 1 (called
asm1 in GPS-X) is the prediction of the amount and change of the solids and
electron acceptor.
The Task Group considered the trade-off between model accuracy and
practicality. They identified the major biological processes occurring in the
system and characterized these processes with the simplest rate expressions
that could be used, resembling the real reactions.
The use of switching functions was made by the Task Group since some
reactions depended on the type of electron acceptor present. These functions
were of the form:
SO
K OH + S O
At low concentrations of dissolved oxygen (SO), the parameter KOH dominates

the expression and approaches a value of zero. At high values of SO, the
parameter KOH would be negligible and the expression approaches unity. If the
switching function was inverted, then the limits when SO were high or low are
reversed. A consequence of using switching functions of this form is that they
are continuous functions unlike discontinuous on/off switches which are more
difficult to simulate.
CONCEPTUAL MODEL
In the development of activated sludge modelling, the manner in which the
quantity of organic matter is measured (BOD, COD or TOC) is inconsistent.
The Task Group decided to use COD since mass balances can be carried out
and since it has links to the electron equivalents in the organic substrate,
biomass and electron acceptor.
The organic material is categorized according to a number of characteristics.

First is the biodegradability of the material. The non-biodegradable organics
pass through the system unchanged and can be further categorized according to
their physical state (soluble or particulate), which is removed from the system
by different pathways. The particulate material is generally removed with the
waste activated sludge, while the soluble material leaves with the effluent. The
biodegradable material is categorized as either readily or slowly biodegradable.
The Task Group treated the former as soluble material, while the latter was
treated as particulate material (this is not strictly correct, but simplifies
matters). The readily biodegradable organics may be utilized for cell
maintenance or growth with a transfer of electrons to the acceptors. The
particulate (slowly) biodegradable substrate is hydrolyzed to readily

biodegradable material, assuming no energy utilization and no corresponding

use of electron acceptor.
The hydrolysis rate is usually slower than the utilization of readily

biodegradable substrate so that it is the rate limiting step, if only slowly
biodegradable substrate is available.
Two types of biomass are modelled:
1. heterotrophic; and
2. autotrophic.
The heterotrophic biomass is generated by the growth on readily biodegradable
substrate under aerobic or anoxic conditions and decays (including endogenous
respiration, death, predation and lysis) under all conditions. The autotrophic
biomass is generated under aerobic conditions only utilizing ammonia for
energy and decays under all conditions.
The nitrogenous material is categorized according to its biodegradability and

physical state. The non-biodegradable particulate material is modelled as a
fraction of the non-biodegradable particulate COD, while the non-
biodegradable soluble material is ignored. The biodegradable nitrogenous
material is divided into ammonia (free and ionized), soluble organic and
particulate organic. Particulate organic is hydrolyzed to soluble organic, while
soluble organic is converted to ammonia by the heterotrophic biomass. The
conversion of ammonia to nitrate by the autotrophs is assumed to take place in
one step.
The Model Matrix for asm1 is found in Appendix A.

Asm2 is no longer implemented in GPS-X, in favour of using the asm2d model (see
below), which corrects errors and deficiencies from the original published model.
Activated Sludge Model No. 2d (ASM2d)
INTRODUCTION
This model (asm2d ) is an implementation of the Activated Sludge Model No.
2d (Henze et al., 1998). The model structure, default values and all other model
aspects follow the publication in every detail.
This model is an extension of asm1, primarily to handle biological phosphorus

removal systems. The model matrix is shown with the nomenclature used in the

GPS-X implementation. Users of this model should consult the reference

(Henze et al., 1998) for details of this model.
The asm2d model is implemented in the CNP and CNPIP library, and the
Model Matrix is found in Appendix A.
ASM2D MODEL COMPONENTS

One major difference in the way this model is presented compared with the
other models is seen in its matrix description. The stoichiometric coefficients
for ammonia and soluble phosphorus are listed outside the table. The reason
behind this is that to eliminate the organic nitrogen state variables (xnd and
snd), they are now incorporated into the other soluble and particulate organic
components as a fixed fraction. Similarly, a fixed fraction of phosphorus is
included in the organic components. The state variables are discussed next.
State Variables
The state variables here are similar to the newgeneral model with the exception
of the fixed nutrient fractions. Examining the soluble components first, this
model differentiates between two substrates:
1. fermentable (sf); and
2. fermentation products (slf ).
Each of these state variables represent a spectrum of organic biodegradable

material. Another state variable is used to model the other soluble organic
material, which is not biodegradable (si). This material is part of the influent
and can be produced during some hydrolysis processes. The soluble nitrogen
components consist of 1) ammonia and ammonium (snh ); and 2) nitrate and
nitrite (sno ). The dinitrogen gas produced (snn ) is also modelled, but is
considered insoluble and immediately comes out of solution. Oxygen (so ) and
inorganic soluble phosphorus (sp ) are the other two soluble states. The
inorganic soluble phosphorus is typically ortho-phosphate.
Looking at the particulate states, the model includes three types of biomass:
1. heterotrophic organisms (xbh );
2. nitrifying organisms (xba); and
3. phosphate accumulating organisms (xbp ).

The phosphate accumulating organisms state variables do not include the

internal storage products, which are separate state variables. Particulate non-
biodegradable organic material is also modelled (xi ). Although it is not
removed from the system, it may be generated during cell decay. The two
internal storage products of the phosphorus accumulating organisms are:
1. internally stored COD (xbt ); and
2. poly-phosphate (xpp ).
Neither of these two components is included in the mass of the phosphorus

accumulating organism. The last state variable is the slowly biodegradable
substrates (xs ) which must undergo hydrolysis before available as a substrate.
Particulate inorganic inert solids (xii ) are present in the system, but do not
interact with the biological model.
Processes
The processes described by this model are separated into four groups:
1. processes involving hydrolysis;
2. processes involving heterotrophs;
3. process involving autotrophs; and
4. processes involving phosphorus accumulators.
The hydrolysis processes include the aerobic, anoxic and anaerobic hydrolysis
of slowly biodegradable organic material into soluble substrate (processes 1-3).
The rate equations are similar for the three processes; however, the rate
constants under these different environmental conditions are not well known.
The hydrolysis of organic nitrogen is not explicitly included in this model.
Rather, a fraction of the organic particulate material is assumed to be organic
nitrogen and therefore hydrolyzes at the same rate as the organic particulate
substrate.
The heterotrophic processes include the aerobic growth on two substrates

(processes 4 and 5), their corresponding anoxic growth (processes 6 and 7).
The fermentation of organic material under anaerobic conditions is also
accounted for by process 8. This process has been identified as one requiring
more research into its understanding. Since little is known about this process, a
large range of kinetic parameters for this rate may be found during the
modelling exercise. Process 9 models the death and lysis of the heterotrophs.

The processes 10-15 describe the phosphorus accumulating bacteria. Included

are:
1. the internal storage of fermentable products (process 10);
2. the internal storage of poly-phosphate (process 11);
3. the aerobic growth of polyP bacteria (process 12); and
4. the lysis of the bacteria and their corresponding internally stored products
(processes 13-15).
The final two processes in the model are the aerobic growth of the nitrifiers
(process 16) and their death and lysis (process 17). The kinetic parameters of
this model, like those of the mantis model, are temperature dependent. A similar
Arrhenius type function is used to describe this dependency.
This model is a minor extension of the original asm2 model. It includes two
additional processes to account for phosphorus accumulating organisms
(PAOs) using cell internal storage products for denitrification. Whereas the
asm2 model assumed PAOs to grow only under aerobic conditions, the asm2d
model includes denitrifying PAOs.

The Activated Sludge Model No. 3 (Gujer et al., 1999) relates to ASM1 and corrects for
some inadequacies of ASM1. The main features of the model are:
• Hydrolysis is independent of the electron donor, and occurs at the same

rate under aerobic and anoxic conditions.
• Lower anoxic yield coefficients are introduced.
• Decay of biomass is modelled as endogenous respiration (vs. the "death-
regeneration" concept used in asm1).
• Storage of COD by heterotrophs under anoxic and aerobic conditions is
modelled.
• It is possible to differentiate between anoxic and aerobic nitrifier decay
rates.
• Ammonification of SND and hydrolysis of biodegradable, particulate
nitrogen (XND) are omitted. Instead, a constant composition of all
organic components has been assumed (constant N to COD ratio).
• Alkalinity limitation on the process rates is considered.
Figure 6-7 shows a schematic of the processes simulated in the asm3 model.

Endogenous XI
O2 /NO3 Respiration
O2 /NO3
SS
X STO
Internal compounds storage XBH O2 /NO3
hydrolysis XBH growt h
Xs
SI Endogenous
respiration
O2 NO 3
SNH X BA
XBA growth
Figure 6-7 - ASM3 Model Processes
The Model Matrix for asm3 is found in Appendix A.
Mantis Model (MANTIS)

The mantis model is identical to the IAWPRC Activated Sludge Model No. 1 (asm1),
except for the following modifications:
• Two additional growth processes are introduced, one for the autotrophic
organisms and one for the heterotrophic organisms.
• The kinetic parameters are temperature-dependent.
• Aerobic denitrification is introduced.
The additional growth processes account for the observed growth of organisms during
conditions of low ammonia and high nitrate. Under these conditions, the organisms can
uptake nitrate as a nutrient source.
The temperature dependence of the kinetic parameters is described by an Arrhenius

equation. See Appendix A for the Model matrix describing this model.
Aerobic denitrification is included in the model according to the Münch modification

(Münch et al., 1996). In many cases modellers have seen nitrate levels overpredicted in
their models due to the simplifications in spatial resolution (ideally mixed aeration tanks,
no oxygen diffusion limitation in floc cores, etc.). The new modification, consisting of
one new anoxic oxygen half-saturation coefficient makes anoxic growth rates adjustable
independently from aerobic growth, and the coefficient itself is an indication of the
degree of aerobic denitrification occurring within the plant modelled. The default value
of the new constant is set equal to the aerobic oxygen half saturation. Aerobic
denitrification is not implemented in the CN2 and CN2IP libraries.

Two-Step-Mantis model (TWOSTEPMANTIS)

The main feature of the twostepmantis model is the modelling of nitrification by a two-
step process, the first step being the conversion of ammonia to nitrite (NO2-), and the
second step being the conversion of nitrite (NO2-) to nitrate (NO3-).
When the sole rate limiting step for the overall nitrification process is the conversion of
ammonia to nitrite as generally observed (Benefield and Randall, 1980; Poduska and
Andrews, 1975), the modelling of nitrification may be adequately represented as a single-
step process. However, transient build-up of nitrite has been observed in full and lab-
scale experiments, and in batch respirometry assays (Mauret et al., 1996), suggesting the
conversion of nitrite to nitrate step could be limiting in certain cases. When this is the
case, the single-step nitrification approach may not be accurate, as shown in recent
studies (Chandran K. and Smeth B.F., 2000).
As a consequence of this, a two-step nitrification approach is required:
• All "anoxic" reactions are duplicated to consider also nitrite (NO2-) as an

electron acceptor. Only ammonia and nitrate (NO3-) are considered as
nitrogen sources for biomass nutrients needs.
• Growth and decay processes are considered separately for the two types of
nitrifiers xbai (nitrite-producers) and xbaa (nitrate-producers).
Another process specific to the twostepmantis model is:
• Hydrolysis of rapidly biodegradable substrate (ssh ).
Aerobic denitrification is also implemented by giving the possibility to adjust the oxygen
half-saturation coefficients for all the anoxic reactions.
The Model Matrix for the twostepmantis model is found in Appendix A.
New General Model (NEWGENERAL)
INTRODUCTION
Dold's general model is not implemented in GPS-X, in favour of the newgeneral
model. However, a description of the general model (which makes up the basis
for the newgeneral model) is presented here.
In the following sections the general model of Dold (1990) is described. This
model was derived from a combination of the asm1 model for non-polyP
heterotrophic organisms and autotrophic organisms (Henze et al., 1987a,
1987b) and the Wentzel et al. (1989b) model for polyP organisms. The

discussion is divided in two: the model components for non-polyP organisms,

and the model components for polyP organisms.
GENERAL MODEL COMPONENTS (NON-POLYP ORGANISMS)

The general model component proposed for describing the kinetic response of
the non-polyP heterotrophic and autotrophic organism masses is based on the
asm1 model (Henze et al., 1987a, 1987b), with three modifications/extensions.
These are with respect to:
1. The nitrogen source for cell synthesis.

2. Conversion of soluble readily biodegradable COD to short-chain fatty
acids (SCFAs).
3. Growth of non-polyP heterotrophs on SCFA.
The Nitrogen Source for Cell Synthesis

In reviewing the initial asm1 model version Dold and Marais (1986) postulated
that under certain circumstances, nitrate, instead of ammonia nitrogen, may
serve as the nitrogen source for cell synthesis purposes. This postulate was
confirmed from analysis of data collected over an extensive period, particularly
in multiple series reactor configurations operated at long sludge ages and which
exhibited high nitrification rates. The use of nitrate as a nitrogen source for
polyP organism synthesis, when the ammonia concentration dropped to low
levels, was also observed by Wentzel et al., (1989b). On the basis of this
information, an additional two processes have been incorporated into the asm1
model version to give four growth processes: aerobic and anoxic growth of
non-polyP heterotrophs with either ammonia or nitrate as the N source for
synthesis.
Conversion of Soluble Readily Biodegradable COD to SCFA

The principal linkage between the polyP and non-polyP heterotrophic organism
masses in BEPR systems treating municipal wastewater is the conversion of
"complex" readily biodegradable soluble COD to short chain fatty acids
(SCFA). This process is the source of SCFA to sustain polyP organism growth
in the mixed culture system as the influent SCFA content is usually minimal.
Wentzel et al. (1985) established the kinetics of this phenomenon and
incorporated the process in the enhanced culture model for completeness even
though all of the influent COD to the enhanced cultures was in the form SCFA
(acetate). The kinetic formulation and stoichiometry of the conversion process
are incorporated in the asm1 model component of the general model presented
here as the process is mediated by the non-polyP heterotrophic organism mass.

Growth of non-polyP heterotrophs on SCFA

In the asm1 model readily biodegradable soluble COD is utilized by the non-
polyP organisms (i.e. heterotrophs) in four possible growth modes - under
aerobic or anoxic conditions with either ammonia or nitrate as the nitrogen
source for synthesis purposes. For biologically-enhanced phosphorus removal
(BEPR) systems it is necessary to distinguish between "complex" and SCFA
readily biodegradable COD; therefore, it is necessary to duplicate the four
growth processes in the asm1 model to account for possible growth on the two
components of the readily biodegradable COD for the mixed culture system.
With regard to growth on SCFA it is likely that only one of the four processes
would be of consequence - anoxic growth with ammonia as the N source. This
is because SCFAs are removed in the unaerated zones at the "front end" of the
continuous flow systems and do not enter the aerobic zones in appreciable
concentrations. However, for completeness all four growth processes in the
asm1 model (for "complex" COD) were duplicated in the general model for
growth of non-polyP organisms with SCFA as substrate. The same kinetic
formulations and stoichiometry for growth on "complex" readily biodegradable
COD and SCFA have been used.
GENERAL MODEL COMPONENTS (POLYP ORGANISMS)

The general model component proposed for describing the kinetic response of
the polyP heterotrophic organism mass is based on the enhanced culture model
of Wentzel et al. (1989b), with one additional process for anoxic growth of
polyP organisms described by Dold (1990) (and the one additional
stoichiometric constant, fup, for anoxic growth). It should be noted that the
phenomenon of accumulation of un-biodegradable soluble COD from
endogenous processes in the enhanced cultures also received attention. Wentzel
et al. (1989a) suggested that this material would be used as a substrate source
by non-polyP organisms in mixed culture systems. While this is likely, no
change was made to the model in this respect because the amount of generation
in the mixed culture systems is small.
The values of the kinetic parameters, as with the asm1 model, are those for 20
degrees Celsius.
The general model is no longer available in GPS-X, in favour of using the

newgeneral model (see below), which corrects deficiencies of the general model.
NEW GENERAL EXTENSION

The newgeneral model is based on the general model with significant changes to
account for so-called 'COD losses' that have been reported in nutrient removal
systems.

Some key features of the newgeneral model include:
• 'COD loss' yields.

• Hydrolysis efficiency factors.
• Heterotrophic yield coefficients for different electron acceptor conditions.
The modelling of BNR activated sludge systems has identified mass balance
problems in some facilities. That is, several experimental and full-scale
evaluations of BNR facilities have revealed imbalances between what is going
into the plant and what is going out (i.e. less COD is going out than going in,
hence the COD 'loss'). Both from a theoretical and modelling point of view,
this causes some problems, and there is no world-wide accepted explanation
for these imbalances. Nevertheless, these discrepancies must be modelled. To
account for these mass balance problems (referred to as anaerobic stabilization
or COD losses), four COD loss terms are included in the newgeneral model.
These include:
• Hydrolysis efficiency factor (anoxic).

• Hydrolysis efficiency factor (anaerobic).
• Fermentation volatile fatty acid (VFA) yield.
• PolyP PHB yield on sequestration of VFAs.
The newgeneral model has proven itself to be a reliable predictive tool for the
BNR process. Nevertheless, users should be aware that the newgeneral model in
its default condition does not result in a COD balance across the system. To
eliminate COD losses (and thus force a COD balance across a newgeneral -
based layout) each of these stoichiometric loss terms should be set to 1.0.
Included in newgeneral are two new heterotrophic yield terms to account for
differences in yield under varying electron acceptor conditions. Where the
general model assumed the same yield irrespective of the electron acceptor,
newgeneral differentiates the yield depending on the presence of oxygen and
nitrate. The added stoichiometric terms include:
• Yield (anoxic).
• Yield (anaerobic).
In total, two state variables and eight processes have been added to the general
model. These include:

State Variables
• Non-releasable polyphosphate (XPP).
• Soluble inorganic nitrogen (SNI).
Processes
• Anoxic hydrolysis of stored/enmeshed COD.
• Anaerobic hydrolysis of stored/enmeshed COD.
• XPP lysis on aerobic decay.
• XPP lysis on anaerobic decay.
• Anoxic decay of PolyP organisms.
• XPPR lysis on anoxic decay.
• XPP lysis on anoxic decay.
• XBT lysis on anoxic decay.
Phosphorus Uptake
As evidence exists that not all polyphosphate is releasable, a new state variable
to represent non-releasable polyphosphate was incorporated. The uptake of
phosphorus (both aerobically and anoxically) in newgeneral results in the
storage of both releasable and non-releasable polyphosphate. The partitioning
of the storage is stoichiometrically determined based on the total phosphorus
taken up.
PolyP Decay
In the general model decay of PolyP organisms was modelled as an aerobic or
anaerobic process. The newgeneral model includes anoxic decay of XBP to
those processes. This results in the anoxic lysis of XBT and XPPR modelled in
a similar way to the aerobic lysis of these variables in the general model. To
account for the lysis of XPP, newgeneral includes three new processes: one for
aerobic lysis, one for anoxic lysis and one for anaerobic lysis.
Hydrolysis
The hydrolysis of particulate COD to soluble material suitable for growth is a
critical step in the COD cycle. The general model modelled hydrolysis as an
aerobic process only, but newgeneral includes hydrolysis under anoxic and
anaerobic conditions and uses these processes as a sink for COD 'loss'.

Fermentation
Whereas the fermentation of SS to SLF was a non-growth related process in the
general model, in newgeneral , this process is associated with the growth of
heterotrophic organisms and hence a portion of the fermented COD winds up
as new biomass; however, equally important is the stoichiometry of this
process because, like hydrolysis, this process includes a COD 'loss' component.
The Model Matrix for the newgeneral model is found in Appendix A.
Comprehensive Model (ManTIS2)
INTRODUCTION
A new comprehensive model incorportaing the most commonly observed
biological, physical and chemical processes in wastewater treatment plants is
developed and implemented in the GPS-X 6.1. MANTIS2 is the outcome of
Hydromantis’ commitment to provide the state of the art models to its clients
through research and development. The MANTIS2 model incorporates a large
amount of information which has become available in technical literature in the
last decade. The motivation behind the development of a compreshensive
model arises from the fact that after the publications of ASM2d and ADM1,
there has been growing interest in extending the capabilities of models to
incorporate the side stream treatment processes like struvite precipitation,
nitritation-anammox for nitrogen removal and other precipitation processes.
Although, state variable interfaces between ASM2D and ADM1 are well
defined, the state variable mapping between two models present practical
challenges in model implementation and limits the versatility in modeling.
MANTIS2 MODEL COMPONENTS

The key features of MANTIS2 model are presented below:
• Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorous removal with integrated anaerobic

digestion processes
• Mass balance for COD, C, N, P, Ca, Mg, K and charge
• 48 state variables (21 soluble + 27 particulate)
• 56 processes
• Two step nitrification using AOB, NOB
• Two step de-nitrification
• Methanol degradation process with methylotroph biomass
• ANAMMOX process

• Anaerobic digestion processes with gas phase modeling for N2, CO2, H2
and CH4
• pH and alkalinity estimation in both liquid and solid train
• Precipitation of MgNH4PO4. 6H2O, CaCO3, MgHPO4. 3H2O, CaPO4,
AlPO4, FePO4, Al(OH)3 and Fe(OH)3
• Unified composite variable calculation
The MANTIS2 model is implemented in MANTIS2LIB. The MANTIS2 model

allows estimation of pH in both the liquid and solid train, therefore it is
possible in MANTIS2 to use additional influent objects like acid feed, alkali
feed to estimate the chemical required for pH adjustment.
The basic structure of the comprehensive MANTIS2 model is based on the

following published models.
1. ASM2d – Basic reactions for biological carbon, nitrogen and phosphorous

removal
2. UCTADM1 – Anaerobic digestion processes
3. Musvoto Model – Inorganic precipitation processes
In addition to above, reference is made to other well accepted models e.g. New
General model, ADM1 and UCTCN and MANTIS model in formulating the
model structure and finalizing the default stoichiometry and kinetics of model
parameters. The modeling approaches for two-step nitrification, two-step
denitrification, denitrification on methanol and ANAMMOX are adopted from
recent research studies.
The essential components of the model like state variables; stoichiometry and
model processes are discussed next.
State Variables
A complete description of the state variables in MANTIS2 model is provided
in the chapter on GPS-X State Variable Libraries.
The soluble states in the model can be classified into four categories. The
soluble inert organic, soluble biodegradable organics, soluble inorganic ions
and dissolved gases. The states in each category are described in following
sections.
Soluble Inert Organics
1. Soluble inert organics (si)

The state represents the inert organics in the wastewater. The soluble inert
organics are not degraded in the wastewater treatment processes. MANTIS2
model considers the generation of soluble inert organic during the hydrolysis of
slowly biodegradable substrate. By default, the fraction of soluble inert organic
production is set to zero. In the anaerobic digestion process, the fraction may
be set to a non-zero value to calibrate the soluble inert COD from the digesters.
Soluble Biodegradable Organics
1. acetate (sac)
2. propionate (spro)
3. methanol (smet) and;
4. fermentable substrate (ss)
5. colloidal substrate (scol)
The state of fermented substrate (slf) in ASM2D is splitted into two states of
acetate (sac) and propionate (spro). The inclusion of an additional state of spro
is required as it is one of the important intermediate products in anaerobic
digestion.
The additional state of methanol (smet) is added to the model. It is now well
accepted that the single carbon methanol is degraded by special microorganism
which have different kinetics than the ordinary heterotrophic organism. This
additional state is helpful to track the degradation of methanol based on the
degradation kinetics of methylotrophic biomass.
Although there is no well accepted definition of the state of colloidal substrate

in wastewater, for the purpose of modeling, it is assumed that this fraction
represents the portion of the substrate COD which lies in the size range of 0.45
micrometer to 1.2 micrometer. These are typically macromolecules which
require hydrolysis before oxidation. This fraction of COD is assumed to behave
differently in different unit processes for example the colloidal COD will
behave:
• as soluble in solid liquid separation in settlers
• as particulate in biological degradation
• as particulate or soluble in membrane separation

Soluble Inorganic
In addition to the soluble organic states, the MANTIS2 model considers

inorganic states of soluble inorganic carbon (stic), soluble nitrite-N (snoi),
soluble nitrate-N (snoa), soluble Ammonia-N (snh), soluble Organic nitrogen
(snd), soluble ortho-P (sp), dissolved calcium (sca), dissolved (smg),
dissolved potassium (spot), dissolved anion (sana) and dissolved cation (scat).
These inorganic states are chosen so as to appropriately describe the N and P
transformation, inorganic precipitation and pH changes across the various unit
processes in wastewater treatment plant.
The soluble inorganic carbon, stic, represents the sum of carbon in all the ionic
species in the carbonic acid system i.e. H2CO3, HCO3-, CO32-. In previous
models like ASM2D and New General, the alkalinity (salk) is used to express
the buffer capacity in the wastewater. In MANTIS2, soluble inorganic carbon
is used instead of alkalinity as the state variable as it is a conserved quantity.
The alkalinity in the model is estimated by considering the soluble inorganic
carbon and the estimated pH of the system.
Two oxidized form of soluble nitrogen, i.e. soluble nitrite and nitrate are
considered in the model. This choice is necessary to model the two step
nitrification process.
The additional inorganic states like soluble calcium (sca), soluble magnesium
(smg) are introduced to model the key precipitation reaction involving these
ionic species. The state variable of soluble potassium (spot) is included to
model the uptake and release of potassium during polyphosphate formation and
degradation. The dissolved anion (sana) and cation (scat) represent all other
strong anion and cation in the wastewater. These states are used in formulating
the charge balance equation for estimating the pH in the wastewater.
Soluble Gases
In addition to soluble oxygen (so), MANTIS2 includes soluble gases states for
nitrogen (sn2), methane (sch4) and hydrogen (sh2). The soluble CO2 is
estimated by the pH and the stic concentration in the wastewater. The soluble
oxygen plays an important role in the aerobic biological systems. The other
gases are more relevant in the anaerobic digestion and fermentation processes.
For each soluble gas, gas-liquid transfer equation are used to model the
dissolution/stripping of the gas in the unit processes.
The particulate states in the model are classified into four categories of
Particulate Inert Organics, Particulate Organic Substrate/Storage, Active
Biomass and Particulate Inorganic.

Particulate Inert Organics
The model includes two states of Inert Organic Particulate (xi) and
Unbiodegradable Organic Matter from cell decay (xu) in the model. The inert
organic particulate is the inert organics fraction that is contributed by the
influent wastewater. Having two states for inert organic compounds makes it
easier to differentiate between the amount of inert organics accumulated from
the wastewater and the amount that is produced by cell decay in the system.
Particulate Organic Substrate/Storage
The MANTIS2 provides one particulate Organic Substrate (xs) and one organic
storage compound for intracellular PHA (xbt). These states are equivalent to
the states in ASM2D and New General Models.
Active Biomass
Several biomass states are added in MANTIS2. To model the two step
nitrification process, two autotrophic biomass Ammonia Oxidizer (xbai) and
Nitrite Oxidizer (xbaa) are considered. Methylotrophic biomass (xbmet) is
included to model the biodegradation of methanol. The Fermentive biomass
(xbf), Acetogen (xbpro), Acetate Methanogens (xbacm) and Hydrogen
methanogens (xbh2m) are included to model the anaerobic transformation in
anaerobic digestion.
Particulate Inorganic
The particulate inorganic states include the model precipitates like Aluminum
hydroxide, Aluminum phosphate, Iron hydroxide, Iron phosphate, Calcium
carbonate, Calcium phosphate, Magnesium hydrogen phosphate, Magnesium
carbonate and Ammonium magnesium phosphate (struvite). In addition to
these precipitates Particulate inert inorganic is used as a composite state for the
unidentified inorganic in the wastewater. The N and P components associated
with the slowly biodegradable organics are included as Nitrogen in slowly deg.
organics and Phosphorous in slowly deg. organics. The inorganic Poly-
phosphate accumulated in PAO is also included as a state.
Composite Variables
MANTIS2 uses a well defined stoichiometry for each state variable to estimate
the composite variables. The state variables and their relationships to the
composite variables are shown in the GPS-X Composite Variable Calculation
chapter.

Processes
The processes included in MANTIS2 model are described below.
Adsorption/Enmeshment
1. Adsorption of colloidal COD: The colloidal COD (scol) is considered to

first adsorb on the heterotrophic biomass. The adsorbed colloidal COD then
becomes a part of slowly biodegradable COD (xs) and requires hydrolyses
before it become available for bacterial metabolism. As both the ordinary
heterotrophic organism and fermentative organism are considered to
participate in the hydrolysis process, the rate of adsorption is defined with
respect to the sum of the concentration of two organisms. The adsorption
rate is first order to the colloidal COD. A rate inhibition term is added to
reduce the rate of adsorption as the ratio of slowly biodegradable COD to
adsorbing biomass increases.
Processes mediated by heterotrophic organisms
2. Aerobic hydrolysis: The heterotrophic microorganisms are considered to

participate in the hydrolysis of slowly biodegradable substrate XS resulting
in production of soluble fermentable substrate (ss). Surface limited
hydrolysis kinetics similar to that used in ASM1 and ASM2d is used. Both
the ordinary heterotrophic organism and fermentative organism are
considered to participate in the hydrolysis process.
3. Anoxic hydrolysis: This hydrolysis process is active under anoxic

conditions. The oxygen saturation term in aerobic hydrolysis rate
expression is replaced with an oxygen inhibition term. A NOX (NO2-
N+NO3-N) saturation term is added to the rate expression. The specific
hydrolysis rate is reduced by anoxic hydrolysis reduction factor (ηnox).
4. Anaerobic hydrolysis: This hydrolysis process is active only under

anaerobic conditions. The rate expression contains oxygen and NOX
inhibition terms. The specific hydrolysis rate is reduced by anaerobic
hydrolysis reduction factor (ηanaer).
5. Ammonification: The ammonification process converts soluble organic

nitrogen to ammonia nitrogen. Both the ordinary heterotrophic organism
and fermentative organism are considered to participate in the
ammonification process. The kinetics of ammonification is similar to that
provided in ASM1.
6. Growth on fermentable substrate (ss) using O2 as electron acceptor:

The process of heterotrophic growth takes place under aerobic conditions.
The reaction rate for this process is formulated considering the concept of

multi substrate kinetics outlined in ASM2d model. The growth rate is

considered proportional to the ratio of fermentable substrate to total soluble
substrate (ss+sac+spro) available to heterotrophic biomass. The main
difference in the growth stoichiometry of different biomass is the uptake of
N and P, Ca, Mg, K, anion and cation during the biomass growth. In this
implementation, it is assumed that concentration of Ca, Mg and K is non-
limiting during growth. If required, the saturation terms for each
micronutrient can be added easily in the model equations. The growth
kinetics does not use the alkalinity saturation function as it is planned to
add a pH inhibition term in the growth kinetics at a later date.
7. Growth on acetate (sac) using O2 as electron acceptor: The process of

aerobic heterotrophic growth on acetate is similar to the process #6 except
that the growth rate is proportional to the ratio of acetate concentration to
the total soluble substrate (ss+sac+spro) available to heterotrophic biomass.
8. Growth on propionate (spro) using O2 as electron acceptor: The process

of aerobic heterotrophic growth on acetate is similar to the process #6
except that the growth rate is proportional to the ratio of propionate
concentration to the total soluble substrate (ss+sac+spro) available to
heterotrophic biomass.
9. Growth on fermentable substrate (ss) using NO3 as electron acceptor:

This process of heterotrophic growth takes place in the presence of NO3-N.
The stoichiometry of this process is developed by considering partial
reduction of NO3-N to NO2-N. The rate expression for the process uses an
inhibition term for oxygen and a saturation term for the NO3-N. The growth
rate is also considered proportional to the ratio of fermentable substrate to
total soluble substrate (ss+sac+spro) available to heterotrophic biomass.
The reaction rate expression also reduces the amount of heterotrophic
biomass by the fraction of NO3-N to total NOX nitrogen available in the
system. It is assumed that when the heterotrophic biomass is converting
NO3-N to NO2-N, it is not participating in the conversion of NO2-N to N2
gas.
10. Growth on acetate (sac) using NO3 as electron acceptor: The process of
heterotrophic growth on acetate using NO3-N is similar to the process #9
except that the growth rate is proportional to the ratio of acetate
11. Growth on propionate (spro) using NO3 as electron acceptor: The

process of heterotrophic growth on acetate using NO3-N is similar to the
process #9 except that the growth rate is proportional to the ratio of

propionate concentration to the total soluble substrate (ss+sac+spro)

available to heterotrophic biomass.
12. Growth on fermentable substrate (ss) using NO2 as electron acceptor:

This process of heterotrophic growth takes place in the presence of NO2-N.
The stoichiometry of this process is developed by considering reduction of
NO2-N to N2. The rate expression for the process uses an inhibition term
for oxygen and a saturation term for the NO2-N. The growth rate is also
considered proportional to the ratio of fermentable substrate to total soluble
substrate (ss+sac+spro) available to heterotrophic biomass. The reaction
rate expression also reduces the amount of heterotrophic biomass by the
fraction of NO2-N to total NOX nitrogen available in the system. It is
assumed that when the heterotrophic biomass is converting NO2-N to N2, it
is not participating in the conversion of NO3-N to NO2-N gas.
13. Growth on acetate (sac) using NO2 as electron acceptor: The process of
heterotrophic growth on acetate using NO2-N is similar to the process #12
except that the growth rate is proportional to the ratio of acetate
14. Growth on propionate (spro) using NO2 as electron acceptor: The

process of heterotrophic growth on acetate using NO2-N is similar to the
process #12 except that the growth rate is proportional to the ratio of
propionate concentration to the total soluble substrate (ss+sac+spro)
available to heterotrophic biomass.
15. Decay of heterotrophs: The process rate of heterotrophic decay is modeled

similar to that in ASM2d model. The main difference in the stoichiometry
of decay reaction is the production of N, P, Ca, Mg, K, anion and cation
according to the biomass composition.
Processes mediated by autotrophic organisms
The model considers two step conversion of NH3-N to NO3-N. The two steps
are mediated by ammonia oxidizer and nitrite oxidizer sequentially.
16. Growth of ammonia oxidizer: The process of growth of ammonia

oxidizer oxidizes NH3-N to NO2-N in the presence of oxygen. The reaction
rate uses ammonia and oxygen saturation terms. The stoichiometry of the
process is developed based on the conversion of NH3-N to NO2-N.
17. Growth of nitrite oxidizer: The process of growth of ammonia oxidizer

oxidizes NO2-N to NO3-N in the presence of oxygen. The reaction rate uses

NO2-N and oxygen saturation terms. The stoichiometry of the process is

developed based on the conversion of NO2-N to NO3-N.
18. Decay of ammonia oxidizer: The process rate of ammonia oxidizer decay
is modeled similar to that in ASM2d model.
19. Decay of nitrite oxidizer: The process rate of nitrite oxidizer decay is
modeled similar to that in ASM2d model.
Processes mediated by phosphate accumulating organisms (PAO)
The processes mediated by PAO are based on the ASM2D model. Three new
processes describing the storage of PHA on propionate, growth of PAO on
PHA using NO2 as electron acceptor and anoxic storage of XPP using NO2 are
added to the processes mediated by PAO.
20. Storage of PHA by PAO using acetate: The rate expression for PHA
storage by PAO using acetate as used in ASM2d is modified to include the
effect of propionate, another VFA used by PAO. The rate expression is
modified by assuming that PAO can utilize acetate and propionate
simultaneous in proportion to the availability of each substrate.
21. Storage of PHA by PAO using propionate: This is a new process and
describes the storage of PHA by PAO using propionate. The kinetics and
stoichiometry of the process is based on concepts used in describing
process #20.
22. Growth of PAO on PHA using O2 as electron acceptor: The

stoichiometry and rate expression for this process is same as ASM2d.
23. Storage of XPP on PHA using O2 as electron acceptor: The

stoichiometry and rate expression for this process is same as ASM2d.
24. Growth of PAO on PHA using NO3 as electron acceptor: This process
of PAO growth takes place in the presence of NO3-N. The stoichiometry of
this process is developed by considering partial reduction of NO3-N to
NO2-N. The rate expression for the process uses an inhibition term for
oxygen and a saturation term for the NO3-N. The reaction rate expression
also reduces the amount of PAO biomass by the fraction of NO3-N to total
NOX nitrogen available in the system. It is assumed that when the PAO
biomass is converting NO3-N to NO2-N, it is not participating in the
conversion of NO2-N to N2 gas.
25. Storage of XPP on PHA using NO3 as electron acceptor: In this process
the storage of poly-phosphate takes place while the stored PHA compounds

are oxidised using NO3-N as an electron acceptor. Only partial reduction of

NO3-N to NO2-N is considered in process stoichiometry formulation.
Similar to the process #24, a reduction factor equal to the ratio of NO3-N to
NOX-N concentration is applied to account for fraction of total biomass
mediating this process.
26. Growth of PAO on PHA using NO2 as electron acceptor: This process
of PAO growth takes place in the presence of NO2-N. The stoichiometry of
this process is developed by considering partial reduction of NO2-N to N2-
N. The rate expression for the process uses an inhibition term for oxygen
and a saturation term for the NO2-N. The reaction rate expression also
reduces the amount of PAO biomass by the fraction of NO2-N to total NOX
nitrogen available in the system. It is assumed that when the PAO biomass
is converting NO2-N to N2-N, it is not participating in the conversion of
NO3-N to NO2-N.
27. Storage of XPP on PHA using NO2 as electron acceptor: In this process
the storage of poly-phosphate takes place while the stored PHA compounds
are oxidised using NO2-N as an electron acceptor. The conversion of NO2-
N to N2 is considered in process stoichiometry formulation. Similar to the
process #26, a reduction factor equal to the ratio of NO2-N to NOX –N
concentration is applied to account for fraction of total biomass mediating
this process.
28. Decay of PAO: The stoichiometry and rate expression for this process is
same as ASM2d except that alkalinity saturation term is not used.
29. XPP lysis: The stoichiometry and rate expression for this process is same
as ASM2d except that alkalinity saturation term is not used.
30. PHA lysis: The stoichiometry and rate expression for this process is same
as ASM2d except that alkalinity saturation term is not used.
Processes mediated by Methylotrophs
A single population of methylotrophs which degrade methanol, a single carbon

substrate, is incorporated in the model. Four reaction processes are considered
for this biomass.
31. Growth of methylotrophs on methanol using O2 as electron acceptor:

The stoichiometry and kinetics of the process is developed using the
principles of heterotrophic growth. The rate expression for growth of
methylotrophs includes oxygen saturation and a methanol saturation term.

The biomass yield on methanol is reported to be much lower than other

carbon sources. Therefore, a different yield coefficient is used in the
process stoichiometry.
32. Growth of methylotrophs on methanol using NO3 as electron acceptor:

The methylotrophs can use NO3-N as terminal electron acceptor to oxidize
methanol. The stoichiometry of this process is developed by considering
partial reduction of NO3-N to NO2-N. The rate expression for the process
uses an inhibition term for oxygen and a saturation term for the NO3-N.
The reaction rate expression also reduces the amount of biomass mediating
the reaction by the fraction of NO3-N to total NOX nitrogen available in the
system. It is assumed that when the methylotroph biomass is converting
NO3-N to NO2-N, it is not participating in the conversion of NO2-N to N2
gas.
33. Growth of methylotrophs on methanol using NO2 as electron acceptor:

This represents the second step of denitrification. The stoichiometry of this
process is developed by considering partial reduction of NO2-N to N2-N.
The rate expression for the process uses an inhibition term for oxygen and a
saturation term for the NO2-N. The reaction rate expression also reduces
the amount of biomass mediating the reaction by the fraction of NO2-N to
total NOX nitrogen available in the system. It is assumed that when the
methylotroph biomass is converting NO2-N to N2-N, it is not participating
in the conversion of NO3-N to NO2-N.
34. Decay of methylotrophs: Decay of methylotrophs is modeled using first

order reaction rate with respect to the biomass concentration.
Processes mediated by Anaerobic Microorganisms
MANTIS2 model includes processes mediated by anaerobic microorganism.

These processes represent the key transformations observed in strict anaerobic
environment like anaerobic digester and other modifications of anaerobic
treatment technology. These processes are adapted from the anaerobic
digestion model developed at University of Cape Town (UCTADM1). The
process rate and stoichiometry was converted from molar units to COD units.
The process stoichiometry was also modified to include the mass balances for
phosphorus, Ca, Mg, K, cation and anion species. The scheme of anaerobic
biodegradation assumes that the anaerobic biomass decay takes place according
to the decay processes listed above. The slowly degradable substrate is then
hydrolyzed anaerobically according to process 4. The resulting soluble
fermentable substrate is then converted to CH4 and H2 by the processes
described below.

35. Growth of fermentative bacteria at low H2: This process models the
fermentation by acidogens under low H2 partial pressure. The process
stoichiometry is developed based on a conversion of model fermentable
substrate (glucose) to acetic acid, H2 and CO2. The kinetic expression for
the process uses a H2 inhibition term to reduce the reaction rate as the
partial pressure of H2 increases.
36. Growth of fermentative bacteria at high H2: This process models the
fermentation by acidogens under high H2 partial pressure. The process
stoichiometry is developed based on a conversion of model fermentable
substrate (glucose) to acetic acid, propionic acid, H2 and CO2. The kinetic
expression for the process uses a H2 saturation term to account for
increased rate at higher partial pressure of H2.
37. Decay of fermentative biomass: The stoichiometry and kinetic expression

for the decay process of fermentative biomass is based on the same
principles as for other biomass types.
38. Growth of acetogens on propionate: This process (Acetogenesis) is the

process whereby the acetogens convert propionic acid under low hydrogen
partial pressure. The kinetic rate expression for the process includes a H2
inhibition term and a propionic acid saturation term.
39. Decay of acetogens: The stoichiometry and kinetic expression for the
decay process of fermentative biomass is based on the same principles as
for other biomass types.
40. Growth of hydrogenotrophic methanogens: In this process

hydrogenotrophic methanogens grow by converting H2 and CO2 to CH4.
The stoichiometry of the process is based on the chemical reaction
describing this process. The kinetic expression for the process uses a
hydrogen saturation term.
41. Decay of hydrogenotrophic methanogens: The stoichiometry and kinetic

expression for the decay process of fermentative biomass is based on the
same principles as for other biomass types.
42. Growth of Acetoclastic methonegens: In this process the the acetic acid is
converted to methane and CO2 by acetoclastic methanogens. The kinetic
expression of the process includes an acetate saturation term.
43. Decay of acetoclastic methanogens: The stoichiometry and kinetic

expression for the decay process of fermentative biomass is based on the
same principles as for other biomass types.

Processes mediated by Anaerobic Autotrophic Microorganisms
A new type of anaerobic autotrophic biomass type is included in MANTIS2 to

perform anaerobic ammonium oxidation (ANAMMOX) process. The process
stoichiometry is described in Strous et al. (1998) as below.
1NH4+ + 1.32 NO2- + 0.066 HCO3- + 0.13 H+  1.02 N2 + 0.26 NO3- + 0.066
CH2O0.5N0.15 +2.03 H2O
According to the above reaction, a mole of ammonia-N is oxidized to 1.02

mole of N2 using 1.32 mole of nitrite-N. The reaction also produces 0.26 mole
of Nitrate-N and leads to growth of autotrophic biomass.
To model this process, two processes are added in MANTIS2.
44. Growth of anammox microorganism: The stoichiometry factors to

express the yield of biomass, NO2-N consumption and N2 and NO3- are
expressed in terms of per unit NH4+-N oxidized. The reaction rate
expression uses an oxygen inhibition function and NO2-N and NH3-N
saturation functions. Total (ionized + non-ionized) concentration of both
substrates is used in the kinetic expression.
45. Decay of anammox microorganism: Decay of anammox microorganisms

is modeled using first order reaction rate with respect to the biomass
concentration.
Chemical precipitation processes
The precipitation reactions in MANTSI2 are adapted from Musvoto et al. 2000
with some modifications. In addition to the processes of precipitation of AlPO4
and FePO4 which are included in ASM2d, five commonly observed
precipitation processes in wastewater treatment are included in the model. The
key differences from Musvoto et al. 2000 are 1) the effect of ion-pair is
neglected in the calculations; 2) the kinetic rate equations use the approach
suggested in ASM2d with a few modification and 3) the mole based
stoichiometry is replaced with mass based stoichiometry for maintaining model
consistency. The kinetic expression for the precipitation reactions uses the
concentration of participating ions, rate of precipitation and solubility product
of the precipitate. The kinetic rate expression is formulated such that the
precipitation and dissolution reactions can be modeled by a single equation.
46. Precipitation/dissolution of CaCO3: CaCO3 is assumed to precipitate as

calcite. The calcite precipitation is assumed to take place in the presence of

Ca2+ and CO32- ions in the solution. The concentration of CO32- is estimated
by using the soluble inorganic carbon and the pH of the system.
47. Precipitation/dissolution of MgNH4PO4.6H2O (struvite): Struvite is the

most commonly observed precipitate in the digester supernatant. The
precipitation of struvite takes place if the Mg2+, NH4+ and PO43- species are
present in the solution. The concentrations of NH4+ and PO43- are estimated
based on the solution pH.
48. Precipitation/dissolution of MgHPO4.3H2O (newberyite): This is

another precipitate of magnesium with phosphate which is normally
observed at lower pH. For this precipitate, Mg2+ and HPO42- ionic species
are required. The concentration of HPO42- ion is estimated based on pH of
the solution.
49. Precipitation/dissolution of Ca3(PO4)2 (ACP): As the numbers of water

molecules associated with the precipitate are variable, an anhydrous form is
considered in expressing the mass concentration of the precipitate. It is
indicated that this is probably the least stable precipitate among the possible
precipitates and transforms into more stable forms with time. The Ca2+ ion
and PO43- species are required in precipitation process.
50. Precipitation/dissolution of MgCO3: MgCO3 (magnesite) is another

precipitate of magnesium that is included in the model. The precipitation
reaction requires Mg2+ and CO32- ionic species for its formation.
51. Precipitation/dissolution of AlPO4: The precipitation of AlPO4 is required

to model the metal precipitation of phosphorous in the plant. The
stoichiometry of the process is similar to ASM2d; however, the kinetic
expression is modified to include the solubility product of the precipitate.
52. Precipitation/dissolution of FePO4: The precipitation of FePO4 is

required to model the metal precipitation of phosphorous in the plant. The
stoichiometry of the process is similar to ASM2d; however, the kinetic
expression is modified to include the solubility product of the precipitate.
Gas- Liquid Transfer processes
Similar to the gas liquid transfer of oxygen, four additional processes as below
are added in the model. The gas-liquid transfer is modeled using a mass
transfer constant (kLa) and the gas saturation concentration at the given
temperature and pressure. The mass transfer constant for each gas can be
correlated to the oxygen mass transfer using gas diffusivities. For
simplification, fractional factors are applied to the mass transfer constant of
oxygen to obtain respective mass transfer constant.

53. Gas-liquid transfer of CO2: Process describes the stripping/absorption of

CO2 from/to the liquid. Since the concentration of CO2 in liquid depends on
the pH, this process is very sensitive to the pH of the solution.
54. Gas-liquid transfer of N2: Process describes the stripping/absorption of N2

from/to the liquid.
55. Gas-liquid transfer of CH4: Process describes the stripping/absorption of

CH4 from/to the liquid.
56. Gas-liquid transfer of H2: Process describes the stripping/absorption of

H2 from/to the liquid.
ALGEBRAIC PH SOLVER
In MANTIS2 model, the pH is estimated in all the unit processes. The

dissociation reactions for acid and bases are much faster than the other
processes used in the model, therefore, algebraic form of equations are chosen
over the differential form for expressing acid/base dissociation reactions. The
pH in each unit process is estimated by solving a set of algebraic equations
which include a charge balance equation along with the equilibrium equations
for each ionic species. Although temperature dependency of the dissociation
constant is considered in the model, ionic activity corrections are not applied in
the equations. For a typical wastewater, the ionic activity correction may not be
important, but at higher ionic concentrations the model pH values should be
used with appropriate caution.
MANTIS2 model uses the dissociation equations for: carbonic acid

(diprotonic), phosphoric acid (triprotonic), ammonium (monoprotonic), acetic
acid (monoprotonic), propionic acid (monoprotonic), nitrous acid
(monoprotonic). The charge balance equation to solve for [H+] concentration is
prepared using the ionized species of weak acid/base and strong anions (NO3-,
sana) and strong cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, scat).
PREFERMENTER MODEL (PREFERMENTER)

The pre-fermentation model implemented in GPS-X is based on the Munch et
al. model (1999), which is a mechanistic model aiming at describing the effect
of design and operating parameters on the rate of VFAs production. The
prefermenter model is found in the CSTR object only.
A general reaction pathway is shown in Figure 6-8.

Figure 6-8 - General Reaction Pathway.
The following is a list of the state variables in the prefermenter model:
• Cis: insoluble substrate (not passing through a 0.45 mm filter) such as

cellulose, fats, insoluble proteins (mg COD/L).
• Css: soluble, high molecular weight substrate, such as soluble
carbohydrates (starch), and soluble proteins (globular) (mg COD/L).
• Cmo: monomer species such as glucose, long-chain fatty acids, amino
acids (mg COD/L).
• Slf: volatile fatty acids (mg COD/L).
• Ce: hydrolytic enzymes which act as a catalyst to hydrolyse insoluble
substrate, soluble high-molecular-weight substrate and proteins (mg
COD/L).
• Cxa: acidogenic bacteria which utilize monomers (Cmo) as their substrate
(mg COD/L).
• Cxm: methanogenic bacteria, which utilize volatile fatty acids (VFAs) as
their substrate then transforming it into methane gas (mg COD/L).
• Cprot: organic nitrogen contained in particulate proteins which is converted
into ammonia nitrogen in the ammonification process as particulate
proteins are hydrolysed. It is also produced from the decay of bacteria
cells (mg N/L).
• Snh: ammonia nitrogen (mg N/L).
• CH4,g: methane gas.
Stoichiometric Parameters:
The stoichiometric parameters to be specified in the influent section are used to
calculate the concentration of soluble, high molecular weight substrate (Cis)

from the influent readily biodegradable substrate (ss) and the concentration of
methanogenic biomass (Cxm) from the influent slowly biodegradable substrate
(Xs):
• fss: fraction of soluble high molecular weight substrate (Cis) in the influent
readily biodegradable substrate (ss).
• fxm: fraction of methanogenic biomass (Cxm) in the influent slowly
biodegradable substrate (Xs).
• fm: conversion factor from COD to cubic meters for methane production
(m3 CH4 /g COD).
The stoichiometric parameters specified in the "hydrolysis", "acidogens" and

"methanogens" sections are the following yield coefficients:
• Ye: Yield for hydrolytic enzymes on insoluble or soluble substrate

(Ce/Css).
• Ya : yield for acidogens on monomers species (Cxa/Cmo).
• Ym: Yield for methanogens on volatile fatty acids (Cxm/Slf).
Kinetic Parameters:
The model kinetic parameters are:
• khis: hydrolysis rate constant for insoluble substrate (g COD/m3.d).

• khs: hydrolysis rate constant for soluble substrate (g COD/m3.d).
• kamm: ammonification rate constant for organic nitrogen contained in
proteins (g N/m3.d).
• kmo: maximum specific consumption rate of monomers by acidogenic
biomass (g COD/m3.d).
• kac: maximum specific consumption rate of volatile fatty acids by
methanogenic biomass (g COD/m3.d).
• da: decay rate constant of acidogens (g COD/m3.d).
• dm: decay rate constant of methanogens (g COD/m3.d).
• de : deactivation rate constant of hydrolytic enzymes (g COD/m3.d).

Process rates:
The process rates described in the model are:
Hydrolysis of insoluble substrate

C s ⋅ Ce
rhis = k his
C xa
The hydrolysis rate of insoluble substrate is considered to be first order with

respect to the concentration of insoluble substrate and to the concentration of
hydrolytic enzymes, and to be inversely proportional to the concentration of
acidogenic biomass, due to a limited surface area available which could cause
mass transfer limitations.
Hydrolysis of soluble substrate

rhs = k hs ⋅ C ss ⋅ C e
The hydrolysis of soluble substrate is considered to be first order with respect

to the concentration of soluble substrate and to the concentration of hydrolytic
enzymes.
Ammonification of proteins
C prot ⋅ C e
ramm = k amm
C xa
The ammonification of proteins is considered to be proportional to the

concentration of proteins, to the concentration of hydrolytic enzymes and
inversely proportional to the acidogenic biomass concentration. Proteins are
regarded as particulate matter with surface area limitations.
Consumption of monomers by acidogens

Cmo S nh
rxa = k mo ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ C xa
K a + Cmo K n + S nh
The consumption rate of monomers is assumed to be proportional to monomers

and to ammonia nitrogen saturation functions and to the concentration of
acidogenic biomass.

Consumption of VFAs by methanogens

Slf S nh
rxa = k ac ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ C xm
K m + Slf K n + S nh
The consumption rate of volatile fatty acids is considered to be proportional to

the volatile fatty acids and ammonia nitrogen saturation functions and to the
concentration of methanogenic biomass.
Decay of acidogens
rd , a = d a ⋅ C xa
The rate of decay of acidogens is assumed to be proportional to their

concentration.
Decay of methanogens
rd , m = d m ⋅ C xm
The rate of decay of methanogens is assumed to be proportional to their

concentration.
Decay of enzymes
rd , e = d e ⋅ C xm
The rate of decay of enzymes is assumed to be proportional to their

concentration.

Model Structure
A schematic diagram of the prefermenter model is shown in Figure 6-9 (adapted
from Munch et al., 1999)
rde
Cis Ye*rhis Cprot
Css
Ye*rhs
(1 –Ye)*rhis Ce
ramm
(1 – Ye)*rhs
Cmo
rda
(1-Ya)*rxa rdm
Ya*rxa
Slf Ya*inbm*rxa snh

Cxa
(1-Ym)*rxm Ym*rxm
Ya*inbm*rxm
CH4 Cxm
Figure 6-9 - Schematic Diagram of the prefermenter Model
The Model Matrix for the prefermenter model can be found in Appendix A.

SUGGESTIONS FOR SELECTING AN ACTIVATED SLUDGE

MODEL
With the large number of models available in the literature and used in GPS-X,
it can be a challenge to select which model is best for each modelling
application. The following simple guide gives a few suggestions and "rules of
thumb" for selecting an activated sludge model.
1. The first choice to be made is the GPS-X macro library. If you are only
concerned with carbon and nitrogen processes, then you should use the
CN (1-step nitrification) or CN2 (2-step nitrification) library. If you are
interested in modelling phosphorus, then the CNP library should be used.
In each case, extra user-defined components can be added to the models
by selecting the associated IP (Industrial Pollutant) library - CNIP, CNPIP
or CN2IP.
2. It is a good rule of practice to keep the model as simple as possible at the
beginning, until you interpret the results and are comfortable with that
model's level of complexity. You can then move to more complicated
models. If you are unsure of which model to start with we recommend
using asm1, asm3 or mantis .
3. The choice of model should depend on the amount and type of data that is
available to support its use. For example, if you have little information
about different substrate types in your system, it is advisable to use models
that have fewer substrates.
The choice of model should reflect the need to simulate certain processes. For
example, if you are interested in exploring P-removal or alkalinity control, you
will need to use models that contain processes that are relevant to those
components. Table 6-2 summarizes the processes in each model, and may be
useful in choosing a model. You can consult the model descriptions earlier in
this chapter or the Model matrices found in Appendix A to see the details of the
processes contained in each model.

Table 6-2 - Model processes in GPS-X

Models
Process
mantis (and 3dmantis)
twostepmantis
newgeneral
Mantis2
asm2d
asm1
asm3
Fermentation Step X X X
Nitrification/Denitrification X X X X X X X
Aerobic Denitrification X X
Aerobic Substrate Storage X
COD "Loss" X
2-Step Nitrification/denitrification X X
NO3- as a N source for cell synthesis X X X
Alkalinity consumption/generation X X X X X X
Alkalinity (as a limiting factor for growth X
processes)
Biological phosphorus removal X X X
Precipitation of P with metal hydroxides X X
Temperature dependency X* X* X X X X X
pH X
Struvite, other Calcium and Magnesium ppt. X
Anammox X
Methylotroph X
* not part of the published model, but added in GPS-X.

Special Activated Sludge Units

Deep Shaft Reactor
The model associated with the deep shaft object is an adaptation of the mantis suspended-
growth model (described in Chapter 5). It takes into account the specific hydraulics and
high hydrostatic pressure found in a deep shaft reactor.
The deep shaft header tank is modelled with two complete-mix reactors (by default), and
is under atmospheric pressure. The downcomer and the riser shafts are modelled with
twenty complete-mix reactors (by default).
Membrane bioreactor (mbr)

The two membrane bioreactor objects in GPS-X (plug-flow and completely-mixed) are a
combination of a suspended-growth activated sludge model and a simple suspended
solids separation filter. They are available in all libraries, and with all biological models.
The two MBR objects are shown in Figure 6-10, with the connection points illustrated.
Plug-Flow MBR Object Completely-Mixed MBR Object
Input
Overflow Input Overflow
Filter Filter
Pump Pump
Figure 6-10 GPS-X Membrane Bioreactor Objects

General Model Structure
The structure of the MBR model combines a conventional activated sludge tank model
(plug-flow or CSTR) with an in-tank solids separation filter, as shown in Figure 6-11. In
the case of the plug-flow MBR, the filter is placed in the final tank (an optional internal
recycle is shown for illustrative purposes). Permeate flow is drawn through the filter at a
rate determined by the filter model.

Completely-Mixed MBR
∞ ∞ ∞ ∞
Plug-Flow MBR
Figure 6-11 Membrane Bioreactor Model Structures
MBR Model Modes
Both of the MBR models in GPS-X feature two different modes of operation: Simple
Mode, Intermediate, and Advanced Mode. Simple Mode assumes that the filter is
properly operated to maintain flux, and does not consider the effects of trans-membrane
pressure (TMP), cake formation, fouling, backwashing, and membrane resistance. The
Intermediate model mode calculates the TMP, cake formation, fouling, backwashing,
and membrane resistance based on the specified backwash rate and cleaning frequency,
but the required permeate flux is calculated based on the influent flow and waste flow to
ensure that the liquid volume in the last tank remains constant. The Advanced model
mode is similar to the Intermediate model mode, however the liquid volume in the tank is
variable and can increase or decrease based on the calculated permeate flux. The user can
control the liquid level using a feedback controller that manipulates the trans-membrane
pressure. Table 6-3 summarizes the differences between Simple Mode, Intermediate,
and Advanced Mode.

Table 6-3 - MBR Model Modes

Operating Operating Mode
Parameter Simple Intermediate Advanced
Flow Balance Model assumes flow in Required membrane Membrane flux is
and Reactor equals flow out, and flux is determined determined from filter
Volume there is no change in based on influent flow model. Reactor
reactor volume. All and waste flow to volume increases and
incoming flow is ensure the liquid decreases depending
assumed to exit via the volume in the reactor on the difference
filter and waste flow is constant. between flow in and
stream. flow out. A controller
is provided to manage
the tank level.
Filter Filter operation is Users must specify Same as Intermediate
Operation ignored. TMP,
backwash/relaxation
cycles, and cross-flow
aeration.
Cross-Flow Filter-cake solids Both solids removal Same as Intermediate
Air removal from cross- and oxygen transfer
flow aeration is are considered for
ignored, but oxygen cross-flow aeration.
transfer from the
cross-flow air to the
bulk liquid is
calculated and
included in the
biological activity.
Solids The solids capture rate The solids capture rate Same as Intermediate
Capture determines what determines what
fraction of the mixed fraction of the mixed
liquor solids remain in liquor solids remain in
the reactor. These the reactor. These
solids remain solids make up the
suspended in the bulk filter cake, and can be
liquid. returned to the bulk
liquid through
backwashing or cross-
flow aeration.
Biological There is no difference in the biological model when using simple,
Activity intermediate, or advanced modes.

Model Parameters – Physical
All physical and operational parameters relating to the specification and operation of the
activated sludge reactors are identical to the CSTR and plug-flow tank objects (with one
exception – mechanical aeration is not available). The specification of the membrane
filter physical characteristics is done in the Input Parameters > Physical – Membrane menu, as
shown in Figure 6-12. All parameters except solids capture rate are ignored (and greyed-
out on these menus) when the model is set to Simple Mode.
Figure 6-12 - Physical - Membrane Forms

The GPS-X MBR model calculates the removal of solids due to the membrane using a
mass balance and the solids capture rate (actually a fraction) specified in the
Input Parameters > Physical – Membrane form . The default solids capture rate has been selected
to provide a permeate TSS concentration of 1 mg/L or less for typical MBR MLSS
concentrations (i.e. 8,000 to 12,000 mg/L). A separate mass balance is applied to each
particulate component in the biological model.
In the simple mode, the permeate flow (and flux) is calculated using a volumetric balance
and the specified influent and pumped flows. In advanced mode, the permeate flux
through the membrane is modelled using a resistance-in-series model (Choi et al., 2000)
as shown below:
∆P (6.32)
J=
µ (Rm + Rg + R f )
where:
J = permate flux (m/s)

∆P = trans-membrane pressure (kPa)
μ = viscosity of water (Pa·s)
Rm = intrinsic membrane resistance (m-1)
Rc = cake layer resistance (m-1)
Rf = fouling resistance (m-1)
The trans-membrane pressure,∆ P, is specified in the Input Parameters > Operational –

Membrane form as described in the Section below. The viscosity of water is calculated
using the following equation (Günder, 2001):
(
µ = 1.793 × 10−3 e −0.043T
0.864
) (6.33)
where:
T = temperature (oC)
The intrinsic membrane resistance,

Rm, is provided in the Input Parameters > Physical –
Membrane form .The default value used is based on data provided by Chang et al. (1999).
In advanced mode, GPS-X tracks the formation of a cake layer on the surface of the
membrane that resists the liquid flux across the membrane. The cake layer is assumed to
be homogeneous and its thickness is calculated as shown below in Equation 6.34 (Choi et
al., 2000).

mp (6.34)
δc =
ρ P (1 − ε )Am
where:
δ c = cake layer thickness (m)

m p = dry mass of cake layer (kg)
ρ P = density of a cake layer particle (kg/m3)
ε = porosity of cake layer (dimensionless)
Am = total membrane surface area (m2)
The dry mass of the cake layer (see Equation 6.33) is calculated using the following
dynamic mass balance on the cake layer:
Bulk convection of solids Solids removed Solids removed due to

to membrane surface due to backwashing cross-flow aeration (air scour)
dm p  qcross  xcake 
= q perm xliq f capture 
− qbackw xcake f bw −    f cross
 
 Am  xcake + K s , cake 
dt (6.35)
where:
qperm = permeate flow rate (m3/d)

xliq = concentration of solids in bulk liquid phase within the MBR (kg/m3)
fcapture= solids capture rate or fraction (dimensionless)
qbackw = backwash flow rate (m3/d)
xcake = mass of solids in cake layer (kg)
fbw= backwash solids removal rate (1/m3)
qcross = crossflow or air scour flow rate (m3/d)
Am = total membrane surface area (m2)
fcross= cross-flow solids removal rate (kg/m)
Ks,cake = half-saturation coefficient for cross-flow air (kg)
The cake layer mass balance considers the bulk convection of solids to the surface of the
membrane, the solids removed due to backwashing, and the solids removed due to cross-
flow aeration. Equation 6.34 ignores the diffusion away from the cake layer into the bulk
liquid as this term is assumed to be small compared to the other terms in the mass
balance. The half-saturation coefficient for cross-flow air and the switching function

based on the mass of cake solids is used to smoothly stop the solids removal as the cake
layer disappears.
The default density of a cake layer particle (see Equation 6.33) is equal to the density of
dry biofilm already used in the GPS-X fixed-film reactors. The default porosity of the
cake layer (see Equation 6.33) is given in the Input Parameters > Physical – Membrane >
More… form and is estimated using information given in Chang et al. (1999). The
membrane surface area (see Equation 6.33) is site-specific and should be selected to
achieve a flux within the range normally recommended by the manufacturer (e.g. a
typical range for hollow fiber membranes is 17 to 25 L/m2/h; see Wallis-Lage et al.,
2005).
The backwash solids removal rate(see Equation 6.34) is specified in the Input Parameters >
Physical – Membrane > More … form . It is multiplied in Equation 6.34 by the backwash flow
and the cake solids mass (term 2 in Equation 6.34) to give the mass of solids removed
from the filter cake per unit time. The default backwash solids removal rate was calibrated
using data from Garcia and Kanj (2002). The default backwash flow (see Equation 6.34) is
entered in the Input Parameters > Operational – Membrane form and is based on data provided
by Garcia and Kanj (2002).
The cross-flow solids removal rate (see Equation 6.34) is the mass of solids removed from
the filter cake, per unit of cross flow air, per unit surface area of the filter. The default
value is entered in the Input Parameters > Operational – Membrane > More … form and is
calibrated based on data in Garcia and Kanj (2002). The cross-flow air flow (see
Equation 6.34) is entered in the Input Parameters > Operational – Membrane form. The
default value gives an airflow per surface area of 0.37 m3/m2/h (see Wallis-Lage et al.,
2005) for the default membrane surface area. The cross-flow airflow should be changed
to reflect changes in the membrane surface area.
The cake layer resistance, Rc, is calculated by combining Equation 6.33 and the Kozeny-
Carman equation for flow through porous passages as follows:
(1 − ε )m p (6.36)
Rc = 180
d p2ε 3 Am ρ p
where:
dp = effective cake particle diameter (m)
The default effective cake particle diameter is given in the Input Parameters > Physical –
Membrane > More … form and is estimated using information given in Shin et al. (2002).
The fouling resistance is calculated as follows (adapted from Choi et al., 2000):

(
R f = R f , max 1 − e
−k f t
) (6.37)
where:
Rf,max = maximum fouling resistance (m-1)

kf = fouling rate constant (d-1)
t = time since last recovery clean (d)
The maximum fouling resistance and fouling rate constant can be found in the Input Parameters
> Physical – Membrane > form . They are selected based on data in Merlo et al. (2000). The
model assumes that the fouling material is completely removed during a recovery clean
so that the time for fouling starts after each recovery clean.
Model Parameters – Operational
The membrane operational parameters can be set in the Input Parameters > Operational –
Membrane form , shown in Figure 6-13.

Figure 6-13 - Membrane Operational Parameters Menu

The trans-membrane pressure from Equation 6.1 is set in this menu, along with the MBR
backwashing options (including the frequency, duration and flow rate of the backwash).
Alternatively, the level controller can be used, which sets the backwash length to the amount of
time required to refill the tank. If the level controller is on and the tank is already full, no
backwashing will take place.
A helpful warning alarm can be set in the Membrane Backwash …More… menu. The warn if
tank is overflowing or empty alarm will print information to the Command Window if the filter flow
causes the final tank to overflow or become empty.
A membrane flux controller can be activated to maintain the trans-membrane pressure at the
membrane flux setpoint using a built-in controller with the rate of pressure increase being the
controller gain.

The cross-flow air used to clean the membranes is assumed to be delivered using a coarse-bubble
aeration system. The alpha factor for cross-flow air is based on total suspended solids
concentrations of between 8,000 mg/L and 10,000 mg/L in the MBR. The standard oxygen
transfer efficiency (cross-flow) is based on a coarse bubble aeration system at a submergence of
4.3 m (14 ft).
The cleaning frequency sets how often physical/chemical cleaning is used to reset the membrane
fouling resistance to zero.
Display Variables
Several membrane-specific display variables are available to be plotted. The Membrane Filter
Variables menu is accessed from the overflow connection point (not the filter connection point),
and is shown in Figure 6-14.
The MBR Cake Variables menu (shown in Figure 6-15) provides display variables for total cake mass
and cake thickness .
Tips on Using the MBR Models
The following points are useful to keep in mind when setting up an MBR simulation:
• Use Simple Mode initially to establish the required operating conditions such as MLSS,
SRT, waste flow, etc. and in cases where details on the maintenance of the permeate flux
are not required. If you are only interested in the biological treatment aspects of the
system, use Simple Mode. If you need to also simulate the physical aspects of the filter
operation (e.g. different backwash cycles, TMP management, etc.), then Advanced Mode is
required.
• When using Advanced Mode, pay close attention to the volume in the reactor(s), as it is
easy to either drain or overfill the reactor that contains the membrane filter.
• If you wish to have a membrane “relaxation” period (rather than a backwash period), set
the duration and frequency as normal, but set the backwash flow rate to zero. This will
cause the permeate flow to cease for the appropriate period of time, but there will be no
backwash flow into the tank. This can be done in both the Intermediate and Advanced
modes.
• There is no steady-state solution for the model in Advanced Mode. The discontinuous
backwashing and cleaning cycles render the model without a true steady equilibrium state
(similar to why the SBR object does not have a steady-state solution). When using
Advanced Mode, you may wish to run a long dynamic simulation (~100 days) to allow time
for the system to reach a cyclic or periodic equilibrium. Due to the fact that there is no
backwashing or cleaning in Simple Mode, the steady-state solver can be used.

• The coarse-bubble cross-flow aeration can provide significant oxygen transfer in small
tanks, so you may find that DO control for biological purposes difficult to maintain.
A summary of the default values of the GPS-XTM MBR model parameters are shown below in
Table 6-4.
Table 6-4– GPS-XTM MBR Model - Default Parameter Values
Model Parameter Unit Default Value Comment/Reference

Solids capture rate - 0.9999 Default value was selected to
provide a permeate TSS
concentration of 1 mg/L or less for
typical MBR MLSS
concentrations
Density of dry cake solids kg/m3 1,020 Hydromantis (2003)
Porosity of cake layer - 0.15 Chang et al. (1999)
Solids backwash removal rate 1/m3 100 Calibrated using data in Garcia
and Kanj (2002)
Cross-flow solids removal rate kg/m 200,000 Calibrated using data in Garcia
and Kanj (2002)
Intrinsic membrane resistance 1/m 1.0e+11 Chang et al. (1999)
Maximum fouling resistance - 1.0e+12 Calibrated using data in Merlo et
al. (2000)
Fouling rate constant 1/d 0.005 Calibrated using data in Merlo et
al. (2000)

Figure 6-14 - Membrane Display Variables Menu
Figure 6-15 - MBR Cake Variables Menu

Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR)
COMMON FEATURES
The models associated with the sequencing batch reactor (SBR) object are
combinations of suspended-growth and sedimentation models. The various
aerated and mixed phases use a suspended-growth model, assuming a
completely mixed hydraulic configuration, while the settling and decanting
phases use a reactive sedimentation model. The models are combined together
to form the whole unit process model.
MODES OF OPERATION
There are three different SBR objects in GPS-X: the simple sequencing batch
reactor (SBR) object, the Advanced SBR object, and the Manual SBR object.
All three objects have the same functionality, appearance and choice of
biological models. They differ in the manner in which the user specifies the
operation of the SBR unit.
The simple and advanced SBR objects require the specification of the timing and
flow rates to define the phases. The manual SBR object requires that the entire
operational cycle be defined by the user, either by having the liquid flows, air
flows, and mixing on interactive controllers, or as file inputs. The manual object
is suited to operator training, while the simple and advanced objects are typical
for an SBR application.
When using multiple, parallel SBRs, it may be desirable to stagger the cycle
times of the units. For example, if two parallel SBRs are in use, each with a
6-hour cycle time, it may be desired to shift one of the SBRs by 3 hours. If both
have 3 hours of detention time, then a continuous influent could be switched
between the two unit processes. To specify a timeshift for an SBR model using
either the simple or advanced objects, the user enters the desired timeshift for
the timeshift for simple and advanced cycles parameter. The timeshift parameter
cannot be set to a value greater than the cycle time.
The three modes of operation are discussed below.
Simple SBR Cycle

The parameters used to specify the operational cycle (in the regular SBR object, not
advanced or manual) are found in the Parameters > Operational – Cycle Settings menu. These
parameters include the duration of one complete cycle and associated seven separate
phases, which have predefined functions. The parameters are shown in Figure 6-16
The seven fixed phases for each cycle are described below:

Figure 6-16 - Regular SBR – Operational Cycle Parameters
1. The unit is modelled as a CSTR without aeration (i.e. air flow,

Mix (and fill)
power or KLa set to 0.0). This phase is usually the starting phase, used
while the tank has just started filling with liquid. This phase represents the
first of four mixing phases.
2. Aerate (and fill) The
unit is modelled as a CSTR with aeration. This
represents the second mixing phase, and is used while the tank is filling
after the aeration has been turned on.
3. Mix only The unit is modelled as a CSTR without aeration. This represents
the third mixing phase usually occurring sometime after the tank has
finished filling. It is typically used as a denitrifying phase.
4. Aerate Theunit is modelled as a CSTR with aeration. This is the last
mixing phase generally used to re-aerate the sludge so that it will settle
properly.
5. SettleThe unit is modelled as a settler, with or without biological
reactions, depending on the model selected. The mixing is turned off to
allow the content of the tank to become quiescent and to promote settling.
6. Decant The unit is modelled as a settler. During this phase, the user-
specified decant flow is activated.
7. Desludge The unit is modelled as a settler. This phase occurs at the end of
the cycle, and the user-specified wastage flow is activated.

With the normal SBR object, the seven phases making up this cycle are fixed in
sequence (the order is shown in the form). The total length of all seven phases
must not exceed the cycle time specified. If the total length of all seven phases
adds up to less than the cycle time, the tank will be idle until the end of the cycle
time. If it adds up to a value greater than the cycle time, the remaining time
and/or phases beyond the cycle time will be ignored. A phase can be disabled
by setting its length to zero.
Figure 6-17 - Advanced SBR Operational Parameters

The decant flow rate (pumped flow parameter) and waste flow rate (underflow rate
parameter) are entered in the Parameters > Operational - Flow Control form.
The influent flow to the SBR is taken from the upstream object (e.g. influent
object) if the influent #1 pump label parameter is left blank in the Flow Control
form. The user must then make sure that the influent flow is synchronized with
the SBR cycle (i.e. entering the SBR during the appropriate phase).
Alternatively, in the Flow Control form, you can enter a stream label for the
influent #1 pump label parameter, a flow rate for the first influent flow parameter,
and the SBR influent flow will be automatically taken from that stream during
the appropriate phase within the cycle (automatic synchronization). The stream
label must be associated with a pumped flow stream (`qcon' variable), for
example an influent icon or pumped flow from a tank. The influent #2 pump label
parameter is ignored in this cycle type.
Advanced SBR Cycle Settings

The SBR operational cycle parameters for the Advanced SBR model are shown
in Figure 6-17. The advanced SBR cycle is more general than the simple SBR
model, allowing the user to define up to ten or more different phases. For each
phase defined, the corresponding duration, mixing (either on or off), aeration
(oxygen mass transfer coefficient), decant flow rate, and wastage flow rate can
be specified. The order of the user-defined phases is fixed according to their
order presented in the forms.
object) if the influent #1 pump label and influent #2 pump label parameters are left
blank in the Flow Control form. The user must then make sure that the influent
flow is synchronized with the SBR cycle (i.e. entering the SBR during the
appropriate phase). Alternatively, you can enter stream labels for the influent #1
pump label and influent #2 pump label parameters in the Flow Control form, flow
rates for the influent #1 flow in phase and influent #2 in phase parameters in the
form (Advanced section), and the SBR influent flow will be synchronized
automatically.
The stream labels must be associated with pumped flow streams (`qcon...'
variables), for example an influent icon or pumped flow from a tank. Most
applications will only use one influent, but second influent was provided for
cases were methanol is added, for example.
Manual SBR Model

If the manual SBR object is used, the user must set up all the important
parameters such as air flow rate, mixing, decant flow rate, and waste flow rate
on interactive controllers to change them as the simulation proceeds.

Alternatively, the parameters can be set up as file inputs or controlled from

custom code in the .usr file.
Figure 6-18 - Manual Cycle Operational Parameters

In the manual SBR model, there are no cycle settings as in the simple and
advanced models. The timing of mixing, aeration and pumping all must be
controlled directly.
The decant flow rate (pumped flow parameter) and waste flow rate (underflow rate
parameter) can be entered in the Parameters > Operational - Flow Control form.
object) if the influent #1 pump label parameter is left blank in the Flow Control
form. The user must then make sure that the influent flow is synchronized with
the SBR cycle (i.e. entering the SBR during the appropriate phase).
Alternatively, in the Flow Control form, you can enter a stream label for the
influent #1 pump label parameter, a flow rate for the first influent flow parameter,
and the SBR influent flow will be automatically taken from that stream during
the appropriate phase within the cycle (automatic synchronization). The stream
label must be associated with a pumped flow stream (`qcon' variable), for

example an influent icon or pumped flow from a tank. The influent #2 pump label
parameter is ignored in this cycle type.
Pond/Lagoon
The pond object contains only the empiric model, which simulates the transformation,
dilution and mixing of state variables in a pond. Unlike the activated sludge models, the
empiric model is empirical in nature. It does not use fundamental mechanistic dynamic
processes to determine the rate of change of the states (such as those found in the Model
Matrices in Appendix A), but simulates behavior that has been observed in existing
ponds, bench-scale studies and pilot-scale studies.
The empiric model simulates three different kinds of ponds: anaerobic , facultative, and
aerated . The pond models are discussed in detail below.
ANAEROBIC PONDS
In the anaerobic pond model, the BOD and TSS removal is simulated using a
simple regression model derived from anaerobic pond behavior in North
America (Beier, 1987).
The following equations describe the amount of BOD and TSS removal:
 hrt 
REMOVALBOD = ( ABOD ⋅ ln (n ) + BBOD ) 
 K hrt + hrt 
 hrt 
REMOVALTSS = ( ATSS ⋅ ln (n ) + BTSS ) 
 hrt
K + hrt 
where ATSS, ABOD, BTSS, BBOD, Khrt = calibration parameters

n = number of ponds in series
Because the empirical equations above only deal with GPS-X composite
variables (BOD and TSS), a methodology is required to transfer this
information back to the state variables. The following list outlines the
relationships for the state variables in CNLIB.
A fraction is calculated for each particulate state variable (xbh, xba, xs, xi, xu,
xsto for CNLIB) that is equal to that variable's concentration over incoming
xcod .
A new TSS value (x) is calculated from the above empirical REMOVAL
equation.

New VSS (vss ) and particulate COD (xcod ) concentrations are calculated as:
vss= ivt * x
xcod = icv * vss
A new BOD value is calculated from the above empirical REMOVAL equation,
and then compared to the BOD value calculated as the sum of the fractions
from step 1 times the new xcod times fbod.
If the BOD calculated from the fractions is less than the BOD calculated from
the empirical equation, excess soluble BOD (the difference between bod and
xbod ) is assigned to ss .
If the BOD calculated in step 3 from the fractions is greater than the BOD
calculated from the empirical equation, the excess particulate BOD (xbodu ) is
assumed to be converted to xu . Soluble substrate (and soluble BOD) is then
assumed to be zero.
Inert and non-reacting variables are mapped through the pond object (si , salk ,
and snn ).
The effluent oxygen concentration (so ) and nitrate concentration (sno ) are
assumed to be zero in the anaerobic pond environment.
Particulate biodegradable organic nitrogen (xnd ) is assumed to be converted to

snh as per the conversion of xs .
Soluble biodegradable organic nitrogen (snd ) is assumed to be converted to

ammonia (snh ) as per the conversion of ss .
The loss of heterotrophic (xbh ) and autotrophic (xba) biomass results in the
production of ammonia (snh ).
FACULTATIVE PONDS
The approach for facultative ponds is similar to that for anaerobic ponds, but
uses a different model for BOD reduction, and a slightly different approach for
determining state variable concentrations. The empirical BOD removal model
used for facultative ponds is from Thirumurthi (1974):
BODEFF = BODINF ⋅ K S ⋅ CTEMP ⋅ C O
where
BODEFF = effluent BOD (g/m3)

BODINF = influent BOD (g/m3)

KS = first order BOD removal rate coefficient (1/d) at 20 degrees Celsius

CTEMP = correction factor for temperature
CO = correction factor for organic loading
and
CTEMP = θ (TEMP − 20 )
  SLR 
CO = 1 − 0.083 log 
  LR 
where
TEMP = temperature, C
θ = temperature correction constant
SLR = standard loading rate (kg/ha/d)
LR = current loading rate (kgBOD/ha/d)
The methodology for the determination of the state variables xba, xbh, xs, xu,
xi, xsto, si, salk, snn, ss, snd and xnd are identical to that for anaerobic ponds.
Oxygen is determined by assuming that the DO is saturated in the aerobic zone,

and zero in the anaerobic zone. The concentration of so is determined from the
following equation:
so = SOST ⋅ AERDEPTH
where
SOST = saturated oxygen concentration (gO2/m3)

AERDEPTH = fraction of depth that is aerobic (unitless)
For the nitrogen composite variables, nitrate is assumed to be converted to

nitrogen gas in the anaerobic zone. Therefore:
sno EFF = sno INF ⋅ (1 − AERDEPTH )
Because anaerobic conversion of biomass and biodegradable nitrogen only

happens in a fraction of the pond, the increase in ammonia (snh ) as shown in
the anaerobic model is multiplied by AERDEPTH.
AERATED PONDS
The aerated pond uses the same empirical BOD and TSS reduction models as
the facultative pond model. However, the default value for the BOD removal

rate coefficient has been changed to reflect aerated conditions (Eckenfelder,

1980).
The methodology for the determination of the state variables xba, xbh, xs, xu,
xi, xsto, si, salk, snn, ss, snd and xnd is identical to that for facultative ponds.
Oxygen is assumed to be saturated at the effluent point of the aerated pond.

Due to this completely oxic environment, nitrate is assumed to remain
unchanged, and is mapped through the pond object.
Ammonia is assumed not to change, due to the assumption that most of the
biomass will be settled out of the water column. Therefore, snh is mapped
through the pond object.
CALIBRATION
The parameters found in the Parameters > Physical page of the pond object
include pond type and settings for pond size. Number of cells in series describes
the degree of plug flowness for the pond system. Typically, BOD and TSS
removal increases with increasing numbers of cells in series. The temperature
values found on the More... page are used in the temperature correction
equations in the facultative and aerated pond models.
The parameters found on the Parameters > Empirical Model Constants include those
used to calibrate the BOD and TSS removal, and the half-saturation coefficient
KHRT that is used to decrease removal efficiency for very short HRTs.
Table 6-5 summarizes suggested calibration techniques for the empirical pond
models found in the empiric model.
Table 6-5 - Calibration Suggestions

Model Calibration
Calibrate with the A coefficients for TSS removal first, then
anaerobic adjust A coefficient for BOD.
adjust BOD removal rate constant. Further tuning can be
facultative
performed by adjusting KHRT and temp/loading coefficients.
Lastly, adjust depth of aerobic zone to calibrate ammonia.
aerated adjust BOD removal rate constant. Further tuning can be
performed by adjusting KHRT and temp/loading coefficients.

POND MODELS IN OTHER LIBRARIES

The above methods for determining the values of state variables from the
empirical pond models are for CNLIB only. These methods have been
extended to the other libraries by making small additions and changes based on
the new and/or different state variables. Table 6-6 describes these differences:
Table 6-6 - Library-specific Algorithms for Empiric Pond Model

Library Additions/Changes from CNLIB pond methodology
CNIPLIB All particulate IP components (xza to xzo ) settle similarly to xi (not changed
biologically, but undergo settling and mixing, as appropriate). Soluble IP components
(sza to szo ) are unaffected by biological activity, but undergo mixing.
CNPLIB slf and sf behave similarly to ss . PAOs are transformed similarly to xbh and xba. sp is
not modelled, and is treated the same as si .
CNPIPLIB slf and sf behave similarly to ss . PAOs are transformed similarly to xbh and xba. sp is
not modelled, and is treated the same as si . All particulate IP components (xza to xzo )
settle similarly to xi (not changed biologically, but undergo settling and mixing, as
appropriate). Soluble IP components (sza to szo ) are unaffected by biological activity,
but undergo mixing.
CN2LIB xbai and xbaa are treated the same as xba. snoa and snoi are treated the same as sno .
CN2IPLIB xbai and xbaa are treated the same as xba. snoa and snoi are treated the same as sno .
All particulate IP components (xza to xzo ) settle similarly to xi (not changed
biologically, but undergo settling and mixing, as appropriate). Soluble IP components
(sza to szo ) are unaffected by biological activity, but undergo mixing.
Oxidation Ditch
SETTING THE RECYCLE FLOW
The oxidation ditch object operation as 16 CSTRs in series (a plug flow tank)
with a large recycle from the last tank to the first. The recycle can be specified
in 4 different ways, from the operational menu, using the ditch recirculation mode
setting, shown in Figure 6-19.

Figure 6-19 - Oxidation Ditch Recirculation Mode Settings
Set ditch velocity – specify a constant surface velocity of the ditch flow
Set constant ditch flowrate – rather than specifying velocity, set the flow
Set proportional ditch flowrate – make the ditch flow proportional to the incoming
flow to the oxidation ditch. Typically, the ditch flow would be 50 to 200 times
the incoming flow.
Set constant outlet fraction – specify the fraction of the ditch flow that exits the
ditch each time around.
SPECIAL 2-D GREYSCALE DISPLAY VARIABLES

The oxidation ditch has a series of special 2-dimensional display variables that
are designed to be displayed on 2-D Greyscale outputs. These variables are
found in the 2-D Greyscale Ditch Output display variables menu. These graphs
show a plan-view of the oxidation ditch, with tank #1 in the lower right hand
corner, and the effluent point in the upper right-hand corner (the actual influent

point depends on the setting in the influent fractions menu). The flow moves
clockwise around the ditch.
Five different variables are available for output: dissolved oxygen (DO),
ammonia, nitrate, oxygen uptake rate (OUR), and denitrification rate (DNR).
Figure 6-20 shows an example of the 2-D greyscale DO graph for a typical
oxidation ditch.
Flow Out
Flow In
Figure 6-20 - 2-D Greyscale Oxidation Ditch Output – Dissolved Oxygen
Please Note: Due to the high recycle rate within the object (and subsequent
short HRTs for each section of the ditch), the oxidation ditch model often will
take longer than normal to converge to steady-state with the steady-state solver.
You may find it necessary to increase the iteration termination criteria and/or the
damping factor on final approach in the steady-state solver menu to achieve a
reasonable solution.
If you are having difficulty with steady-state solutions, you can halt the steady-
state solver at a higher iteration termination value, and run a short dynamic
simulation to test if the steady-state solver solution is adequate. If the dynamic
solution does not diverge appreciably from the steady-state conditions, then the
higher iteration termination value is suitable. If you have any questions or
problems, please contact us for assistance at support@hydromantis.com.

High Purity Oxygen (HPO) System

The high purity oxygen (HPO) activated sludge object works the same way as a
plug-flow tank object, except that the aeration system uses a HPO gas feed
instead of regular air. In addition, the entire plugflow system is capped, and
each reactor has a headspace. The headspaces are connected, to allow
downstream flow. The flow of gas downstream is determined from the gas
input and venting flows, and equalizes the pressure in all the reactor
headspaces. Figure 6-21 shows the physical configuration of the HPO system:
HPO Feed In
Vent Gas Out
Water Flow In Water Flow Out
Figure 6-21 - Schematic of High Purity Oxygen (HPO) System
The flow of gas and flow of water are modelled separately. The exchange of
O2 gas, N2 gas and CO2 gas at the air/water interface is determined using
Henry’s Law, corrected for temperature and headspace pressure.
The regular biological models have been supplemented in the HPO object with
stoichiometry to calculate CO2 gas generation. As the gas travels downstream,
O2 is transferred into the liquid and consumed by the biological activity. N2
and CO2 are generated, and equilibrated with the gas concentrations in each
headspace. Consequently, the composition of the gas (fraction of the gas that is
O2, N2 and CO2) can be displayed for each reactor in the plug-flow system.
Display variables for the gas composition can be found in the HPO System
Variables display variables menu.
Because the HPO system is capped, and CO2 gas is contained in the headspace
at concentrations often much higher than atmospheric values, HPO systems
may have atypical pH. The GPS-X HPO object contains a pH calculator that
determines the pH in the liquid for each reactor. For details on the pH model,

refer to the pH discussion in the “Tools” chapter (the model in the Toolbox is
the same one used here). It is important to properly specify the anion and
cation concentrations in the tank to achieve a calibrated pH calculation.
The pH that is determined for each reactor can be set to inhibit biological
growth, using the pH inhibition settings in the Physical parameters more… button.
The pH inhibition is set to OFF by default.
The growth of biomass is multiplied by a pH inhibition factor, taken from

Grady and Lim (1980):
inhib = [1 − 0.833(7.2 − pH )]
which is bounded between zero and one. This creates a linear decline between
pH = 7.2 and pH ≈ 6.1.
Open Basin HPO
MODELLING OF GAS TRANSFER IN OPEN BASIN HPO

The gas transfer to the bulk liquid phase of a biological reactor is modelled
using a dynamic mass balance written for each dissolved gas (Hydromantis,
2011). For example, a dissolved oxygen mass balance around a completely
stirred tank reactor (CSTR) is shown below
V
dC L
dt
( )
= QC in − QC L + K L a C ∞* − C L V + rV
where:
V = reactor volume (m3)
CL = concentration of dissolved oxygen (DO) in the reactor (mg/L)
Q = influent flow rate (m3/d)
Cin = concentration of DO entering reactor (mg/L)
KLa = oxygen mass transfer coefficient at field conditions (1/day)
C ∞* = DO saturation concentration at field conditions (mg/L)
r = rate of use of DO by biomass (g/day), the respiration rate

The volume, flows, and reaction rates are known from specifications or other
modelling equations leaving two terms that must be calculated in order to solve
the dissolved oxygen mass balance over time for the DO concentration in the
reactor, CL:
*
1) DO saturation concentration at field conditions, C ∞ , and
2) Oxygen mass transfer coefficient at field conditions, KLa.
CALCULATION OF DO SATURATION CONCENTRATION AT

FIELD CONDITIONS
The DO saturation concentration at field conditions is calculated as follows:
C∞* = τ × β × Ω × η × C∞* 20
where:
τ = temperature correction factor (unitless)
β = correction factor for salts, particulates, and surface-active substances

(unitless)
Ω = pressure correction factor (unitless)
C∞* 20 = DO saturation concentration at 20 oC and 1 atm (mg/L)
The correction factors are used to adjust the DO saturation concentration to

account for the temperature of the liquid, the pressure at the submergence level
of the diffusers, and the salts, precipitates, and surface-active substances found
in the wastewater.
The temperature correction factor is calculated as follows:
C st*
τ=
C s*20
where:

C st* = surface DO saturation concentration at temperature of t and 1 atm air

pressure (mg/L)
C s*20 = surface DO saturation concentration at 20 oC and 1 atm at pressure

(mg/L)
The surface DO saturation concentration at liquid temperature t and an air

pressure of 1 atm is obtained using a lookup table in GPS-X that is based on
temperature. The lookup table data were taken from Appendix C of the
USEPA Design Manual – Fine Pore Aeration Systems (USEPA, 1989). When
the temperature falls between two data points in the table, GPS-X uses linear
* *
interpolation to determine the C st value. The value of C s 20 is 9.09 mg/L.
The correction factor for salts, particulates, and surface-active substances, β , is

a parameter that must be measured or estimated for the wastewater of interest.
In GPS-X, a default value of 0.95 is used.
The pressure correction factor is calculated as shown below:
Pb − pv
Ω=
Ps − pv
where:
Pb = barometric pressure at elevation and air temperature (kPa)
Ps = standard barometric pressure (101.325 kPa)
pv = vapour pressure of water at liquid temperature (kPa)
The barometric pressure at elevation and air temperature is calculated using the
following formula taken from Appendix B-2 of Metcalf and Eddy (2003):
 gM (z b − z s )
Pb = exp −  Ps
 RT air 
where:
M = molecular weight of air (28.964 kg/kg-mole)

R = universal gas constant (8314 N·m/kg-mole·K)
Tair = air temperature (K)
zi = elevation at position i (m)
The vapour pressure of water at the liquid temperature is determined using the
Antoine equation (Felder and Rousseau, 1986):
B
log10 pv = A −
T +C
where:
A, B, C = Antoine coefficients
The depth correction factor for oxygen saturation and is given by
 d
 Ps + 9.8 
δ =
2
Ps
The parameter d is the depth tank
The DO saturation concentration at 20 oC and 1 atm is calculated as follows:
(
C∞* 20 = δ C s*20 )
The η for each gas is estimated using the following expression.
molfrO2
η=
molfratmO2
molfro2 = average mole fraction of oxygen in bubble (-)
molfratmo2 = mole fraction of oxygen in air (-)

The average mole fraction of oxygen in the bubble is estimated as below.
molfrO2 = wf feed × molfr feedO2 + (1 − wf feed )× molfroutO2
Where:
molfrffeedO2 = mole fraction of oxygen in feed gas (-)
molfrfoutO2 = mole fraction of oxygen in out gas (-)
wffeed = weight factor for averaging (-, default values is 1.0)
The estimation procedure for the gas composition in the out gas is provided in
later section.
The final expression for the DO saturation concentration at field conditions is

as follows:
C∞* = τ × β × Ω × δ × η × C s*20
OXYGEN MASS TRANSFER COEFFICIENT AT FIELD

CONDITIONS CALCULATION
GPS-X provides four different ways to specify the user inputs to estimate the
gas-liquid transfer in the open basin HPO system.
1) Direct specification of the clean water KLa at 20oC
2) Specifying the gas flow rate at standard condition of 1 atm pressure and
20oC temperature
3) Specify the wire power input of the oxygenator
4) Use a DO controller

In each of the above option, the user has the option of specifying SOTE. The
default value for SOTE for high purity oxygen is considered to be 90%
ENTERING KLA DIRECTLY
Estimate KLa at field condition
K L aT = (αF )θ (T −20 ) K L a20

6.11)
where:

θ = temperature correction factor (default value in GPS-X is 1.024)
α = wastewater correction factor for K L a 20
F = diffuser fouling factor (default value in GPS-X is 1.0)
Estimate Oxygen Transfer Rate (OTR) at Field Conditions in g/d
(
OTR = K L aT C∞* − C L V ) 6.12)
Estimate Standard Oxygen Transfer Rate (SOTR) in g/d
(
SOTR = K L a20 C∞* 20 V ) 6.13)
The gas flow is calculated using Equation 6.15.

SOTR
Gs =
ρ gas 6.15)
MWgas
where:
molfrO2 = mole fraction of O2 in feed gas (mole O2/mole gas)
MWO2 = molecular weight of O2 (32 g/mole O2)
ρ gas = density of feed gas (g/m3)

MWgas = average molecular weight of gas (g/mole gas)
The airflow at standard condition is converted to field conditions using the ideal gas
law:
Gs , field =
(T field + 273.15)
×
Pfeed
× Gs
(Ts tan dard + 273.15) Pb 6.16)
where:

Estimate the SAE
The SAE is estimated based on the correlation provided by Praxair. The expression is
valid for SOTE in the range of 86% to 100%. If the user specified SOTE is less than
80% then the SAE is bounded at 7.11 kg/kWh.
SAE = 17.861 × (SOTE ) − 40.518 × SOTE + 28.092

2
Where:
SAE = Specific aerator energy (wire), kgO2/kW-hr
SOTE = Standard oxygen transfer rate. %
The mechanical power requirement is estimated using the following expression.

SOTR
Pmechanical =
SAE × CF2 × η motor 6.22)
where:
SAE = mechanical aerator oxygen transfer rate (kg O2/kW·h)
ηmotor = motor efficiency, -
ENTERING AIRFLOW
The gas flow rate is entered at a given at standard conditions of 1 atm and 20oC.
Standard Oxygen Transfer Rate (SOTR) in g/d
The SOTR is calculated using Equation 6.15.
ρ gas
SOTR = Gs × SOTE × molfrO2 × MWO2 ×
MWgas
where:

Estimate OTR
The OTR is calculated using Equation 6.24.
OTR =
SOTR (αF )θ T − 20 C∞* − CL( )
C∞* 20

Estimate KLa at standard condition
SOTR
K L a20 =
C∞* 20 × V
OTR
K L aT =
(
C∞* − CL × V)
SOTR
Gs =
ρ gas
MWgas
where:


Estimate Air flow rate at Field Conditions
law:
Gs , field =
(T field + 273.15)
×
Pfeed
× Gs
where:

Estimate the SAE
SAE = 17.861 × (SOTE ) − 40.518 × SOTE + 28.092

2
Where:
SOTR
Pmechanical =
SAE × CF2 × η motor

where:
ENTERING OXYGENATOR POWER

Estimate the SAE
SAE = 17.861 × (SOTE ) − 40.518 × SOTE + 28.092

2
Where:
Estimate the SOTR
SOTR = Pmechanical × SAE × CF2 × η motor
where:

Estimate OTR
The OTR is calculated using Equation 6.24.
OTR =
(
SOTR (αF )θ T − 20 C∞* − CL )
C∞* 20
Estimate KLa at standard condition
SOTR
K L a20 =
C∞* 20 × V
OTR
K L aT =
(
C − CL × V
*
∞ )

SOTR
Gs =
ρ gas
MWgas
where:

Estimate Air flow rate at Field Conditions
law:
Gs , field =
(T field + 273.15)
×
Pfeed
× Gs
where:

DO CONTROL
The KLa at field conditions is calculated by the controller.
Estimate KLa at standard conditions

K L aT
K L a20 =
(αF )θ (T −20 )
where:

θ= temperature correction factor (default value in GPS-X is 1.024)
α= wastewater correction factor for K L a 20
F = fouling factor (default value in GPS-X is 1.0)
Estimate Oxygen Transfer Rate (OTR) at Field Conditions in g/d
(
OTR = K L aT C∞* − C L V )
Estimate Standard Oxygen Transfer Rate (SOTR) in g/d
(
SOTR = K L a20 C∞* 20 V )
SOTR
Gs =
ρ gas
MWgas

where:

law:
Gs , field =
(T field + 273.15)
×
Pfeed
× Gs
where:

Estimate the SAE
SAE = 17.861 × (SOTE ) − 40.518 × SOTE + 28.092

2
Where:

SOTR
Pmechanical =
SAE × CF2 × η motor
where:
ESTIMATION OF EFFLUENT GAS COMPOSITION

The open basin HPO considers the gas-liquid transfer of O2, CO2, N2, H2 and CH4 in
Mantis2 model. In Mnatis3 model, gas liquid transfer of N2O is also modeled. The
partial pressure of each gas at the surface of the tank is estimated by assuming a
virtual gas headspace having a volume equivalent to the volume of the gas holdup in
the tank. The virtual head space thus represents the volume in the tank occupied by
the bubbles.
The volume of the virtual headspace is estimated by using the following expression.
Vheadspace = Vliquid × φholdup
Where:
Vheadspace = volume of headspace (m3)
Vliquid = volume of liquid in tank (m3)
Φholdup = gas holdup in tank (-)
The partial pressure of each gas in the head space is then integrated using the
following derivative equation.

dg i ,o ( ptotal × rg ,i × Vliquid × f molarvolume + g i ,in × Qgas ,in − g i ,o × Qvent )

=
dt Vheadspace
Where:
gi,o = partial pressure of i gas, atm
ptotal = total pressure of the gas in head space (atm)
rg,i = gas transfer rate for i gas, mole/m3/d
Vliquid = volume of liquid, m3
fmolarvolume = molar volume of gas at standard condition
gi,in = partial pressure of feed gas, atm
Qgas,in = feed gas flow rate, m3/d
Qvent = outlet gas fow rate, m3/d
MODELING OF TEMPERATURE DEPENDENT KINETICS

In general, the relationship between the growth kinetics and the temperature may be
expressed using an asymmetrical bell shaped curve. The crest of the curve represents
the maximum growth rate at optimum temperature. The growth rate on either side of
the crest decreases according to some appropriate growth rate-temperature
relationship.
There are a number of models which may be applied to model the temperature
dependent kinetics for biological reactions. Depending on the structure of the model,
the model may require estimation of model parameters which may be very different
than the traditional temperature coefficient approach used in the wastewater
engineering. Generally, the Arrhenius equation is used to model the temperature
effect on kinetic parameters in the range of 5oC-35oC. This equation requires one
parameter of temperature coefficient. The values of temperature coefficients are well
researched. Therefore, using any other model which deviates from this relationship
will require recalculating of model parameters. To model such a curve the following
three parameter model was used.

1) Estimate the kinetic coefficient at the optimum temperature – The kinetic parameters
values in GPS-X are listed at 20oC. Therefore, this value is translated to a value at the
optimum temperature using the following equations.
k opt = k 20 . [θ1 ]�Topt −20� Topt > 20

k opt = k 20 . [θ2 ]�20−Topt� Topt < 20
Where:
kopt – kinetic coefficient at Topt, unit
k20 – kinetic coefficient at 20oC, unit
Topt – optimum temperature at which the value of kinetic coefficient is maximum, oC
θ1 – Arrhenius coefficient for low temperature, -
θ2 – Arrhenius coefficient for high temperature, -
2) Estimate the value of kinetic coefficient at a given temperature T by using following

equations.
k T = k opt . [θ1 ]�T−Topt� T < Topt

k T = k opt . [θ2 ]�Topt−T� T > Topt
Where:
kT – kinetic coefficient at T, unit
T – actual temperature, oC
Based on the above relationships the temperature dependency of the kinetic

coefficients can be expressed as shown in Figure 22. For the low temperature range,
the default GPS-X temperature coefficient values were used for all the kinetic
parameters. For the high temperature range temperature coefficient (θ2), the default
values of 1.15 and 1.25 were used for the growth rate of heterotrophic and
autotrophic microorganisms respectively.

1.2
Relative Nitrification Activity

0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
20 25 30 35 40 45
Tempertaure, oC
Figure 22 variation of nitrifier kinetic parameter values with temperature
TEMPERATURE MODELING
The current GPS-X model uses a user defined temperature in the biological unit
processes. In using these models, it is assumed that the user has previous knowledge
about the expected temperature in different biological reactors. In this project, it was
decided to estimate the temperature in the biological units based on the heat balance
in the tank considering heat losses and gains.
A simple heat balance model as proposed by van der Graff (1976) and later validated
by Gillot and Vanrolleghem (2003) was used to model the temperature change in a
biological tank. The model was appropriately modified to account for the heat
generation in denitrification and nitrifications reactions. The details of the model are
described in following sections.
The equations described in Gillot and Vanrolleghem (2003) were developed for a
completely mixed basin under steady state conditions. These equations were
appropriately modified to model the temperature under dynamic conditions. The
completely mixed hypothesis assumes that the water temperature is uniform over the
basin, and equals the outlet temperature. The energy balance over the reactor can be
expressed with following equation.
𝑑𝑇𝑤𝑜
𝑉. 𝜌𝑤 . 𝑐𝑝𝑤 . = 𝑄𝑤 . 𝜌𝑤 . 𝑐𝑝𝑤 . [𝑇𝑤𝑖 − 𝑇𝑤𝑜 ] + ∆𝐻
𝑑𝑡
Where:
V -volume of the reactor, m3

ρw - density of water, kg/m3;

cpw - the specific heat of water, J/kg/oC;
Qw - the wastewater flow rate, m3/s;
Twi - the influent temperature, oC;
Two - the water temperature in reactor, oC
ΔH - enthalpy change due to heat transfer, J/s
The ΔH term includes the following terms which are also shown in Figure.
1) convective and evaporative loss at the surface of the reactor due to

aeration (Hi)
2) heat loss due to conduction across the reactor wall (Htw)
3) heat input due to mechanical and blower energy(Hp)
4) heat input due to biological heat production (Hb
The calculation method for each heat transfer term is shown in Table 7. The present
model neglects the heat transfer due to solar radiation and long wave radiation. The
surface convection and evaporation losses are lumped into the convection and
evaporative heat transfer due to aeration.
Table 7 Heat transfer terms with equations for estimation

Heat Transfer Term Equation used for Comment
estimation
Hi Ui.A.(Ta-Two) Convective and evaporative loss during
aeration
Htw = Htlaw + Htlsw Htlaw =UlaAla(Two-Ta) Heat transfer liquid/air contact wall
Htlsw =UlsAls(Two-Ts) Heat transfer liquid/soil contact wall
Hp Paer Power input of surface aerator or blower
Hb = Hbaer+ Hbdn+ Hbaut Hbaer = Huaer*rOU Heat generation from the aerobic oxidation
Hbdn = Hudn*rDN Heat generation from denitrification
Hbaut = Hunr*raut Heat generation from nitrification
The list of parameters used in the temperature estimation model is as shown in Table 8.
Table 8 Parameters for the temperature model

Parameter Description Unit Value
Ui Heat coefficient W/m2/C Subsurface aeration, Ui = 25
Surface aeration, Ui = 11.4.Paer/V
A Surface area of reactor m2 Variable
V Volume of the reactor m3 Variable
Ta Air temperature C Variable
Two Water temperature in reactor C Variable
Ula Heat transfer coefficient for W/m2/C 1.0 (default)

liquid/air wall
Ala Liquid-air contact wall area m2 Variable
Uls Heat transfer coefficient for W/m2/C 1.0 (default)
liquid/air wall
Ts Soil temperature C Variable
Als Liquid-soil contact wall area m2 Variable
Paer Total aerator power W Variable
Huaer Unit heat production during J/g O2 consumed 13985.0 (default)
aerobic reaction
Hudn Unit heat production during J/g NO3-N consumed 32000.0 (default)
denitrification
Huaut Unit heat production during J/g NH4-N consumed 25000.0 (default)
nitrification
rou Oxygen uptake rate g O2 consumed/s Estimated by model
rdn denitrification rate g NO3-N consumed/s Estimated by model
raut Ammonia oxidation rate g NH3-N oxidized/s Estimated by model
All the heat transfer terms are estimated and the heat balance equation is solved both for
steady state and dynamic conditions. An iterative Newton-Raphson method is used to
solve for temperature at steady state.
Powdered Activated Carbon

The powdered activated carbon (PAC) object is a normal CSTR object that has been
enhanced with powdered activated carbon addition. The carbon sorbs one or more
components using a competitive sorption isoterm. The sorbed components are then
coverted to particulate inerts before moving downstream. The version of the PAC model
is different in the IP libraries, where 3 user-defined components can be added to the
existing sorbable set of state variables, and used as toxic inhibitors to biological activity.
SORPTION ISOTHERMS
In the CN, CNP and CN2 libraries, the only components being sorbed from
solution onto the PAC are ss (soluble substrate) and si (soluble inerts). In this
2-component system, the sorption rates are:
MASI ⋅ SI
adsrate SI = ⋅ X PAC ⋅ R ADS
 SS 
KLSI ⋅ 1 + 
 KLSS 
MASS ⋅ SS
adsrate SS = ⋅ X PAC ⋅ R ADS
 SI 
KLSS ⋅ 1 + 
 KLSI 

where
adsrateSI = adsorption rate of SI (gCOD/m3/d)

adsrateSS = adsorption rate of SS (gCOD/m3/d)
MASI = maximum sorption capacity for SI (gCOD/gPAC)
MASS = maximum sorption capacity for SS (gCOD/gPAC)
KLSI = SI sorption half-sat coefficient (gCOD/m3)
KLSS = SS sorption half-sat coefficient (gCOD/m3)
XPAC = PAC concentration in liquid (gPAC/m3)
RADS = adsorption rate (1/d)
The PAC model calculates the amount of “fresh” PAC (PAC that is available to
sorb components), and “used” PAC (PAC that has components sorbed onto it,
and is not available to sorb more), and the fraction of total PAC that is “fresh”
and available to sorb.
The model calculates the concentrations of individual components that are

bound to PAC. For PAC-bound soluble substrate, the biomass will grow at an
enhanced rate, due to the presence of a concentrated substrate source. This
enhancement of growth is controlled by the bioregeneration factor, by which all
of the biological growth rates (that grow on ss) are multiplied. The
consumption of PAC-bound ss frees up the “used” PAC to become “fresh”
PAC again.
TOXIC INHIBITION IN IP LIBRARIES

In the CNIP, CNPIP and CN2IP libraries, the above-described functionality is
enhanced by the addition of user-defined toxic components and their sorption
properties. Users can use the IP library versions of the PAC object to
investigate the relationship between toxic inhibition and PAC addition to sorb
the toxics.
Toxic Inhibition
The growth rates for biomass (both heterotrophic and autotrophic) in the
Mantis biological model is appended with a switching function for the presence
of toxic inhibitors. The user must identify which components are the toxic
components, and specify the relative inhibition of each component. The Toxic
Inhibition menu contains the parameters used in the inhibition switching
function. Figure 6-23 shows the Toxic Inhibition menu, with sza (IP state
variable “soluble component ‘a’”) filled in as Toxic Component #1.

Figure 6-23 - Toxic Inhibition Menu

Note that you have to specify the cryptic variable name without labels. You
may specify any state variable as a toxic component, including regular states
(sno, snh, xnd, etc.) and any of the IP state variables (sza, szb, xza, xzb, etc.).
The toxic component 1 inhibition constant is a half-saturation coefficient that

represents the concentration at which the biological growth rate will be half of
its normal value.
Sorption of Toxic Components
The sorption parameters for the toxic components are found in the PAC Addition
menu, in the more… button. These components are added to the ss and si
sorption isotherms described above, to make a 5-component competitive
sorption system. The sorption rates for a 5-component system are all of the
form:
MAvar ⋅ var1
adsratevar = ⋅ X PAC ⋅ RADS
 SI SS var 2 var 3 
KLvar 1 1 + + + + 
 KLSI KLSS KLvar 2 KLvar 3 
where var1, var2, var3 = toxic component concentrations (g/m3)

MAvar = maximum adsorption capacity (g/gPAC)
KLvar = sorption half-saturation coeff (g/m3)
The multi-component competitive sorption model will favour sorption of those

components with the lowest sorption half-saturation coefficient.

Attached-Growth Models 201
CHAPTER 7
Attached-Growth Models
Introduction
This chapter describes the aerobic attached-growth models available in GPS-X. These
models are associated with the trickling filter, rotating biological contactor (RBC),
submerged biological contactor (SBC) and biological aerated filter (BAF) objects.
The major difference between these models and the suspended-growth models described
in Chapter 5 is the inclusion of the diffusion process in the biofilm. Although diffusion
occurs in suspended-growth systems (substrate and oxygen must diffuse into the activated
sludge floc), it is usually neglected since the rate limiting steps are the biological
reactions. However, in attached-growth processes, the diffusion and biological reactions
must be considered, increasing the complexity of the models.
The trickling filter, RBC, and SBC processes are similar. They provide biofilm biological
treatment, with excess biofilm sloughing separated in a clarifier object. The SBC and
BAF are flooded processes, with mechanical supplemental aeration. The BAF differs
from the other processes in that it:
• is a combined biological and solids separation process, and

• has a mechanical process for controlling excess biomass growth and captured solids
(i.e. backwash)
The BAF object is therefore a combination of an attached-growth model, described in

Chapter 6, and a filtration model. The filtration model is described in Chapter 8 (one-
dimensional model).
Trickling Filter Model
INTRODUCTION
The trickling filter model is available in all the libraries, using the same
biological reactions found in the suspended-growth models in the appropriate
library. The model can predict the extent of carbon and nitrogen removal (by
uptake or oxidation) and denitrification, and phosphorus uptake and release (in
the CNP library). This model incorporates the growth kinetics and transport
processes for the corresponding state variables. The profiles of the various

202 Attached-Growth Models
components through the biofilm are modelled so that different environments

(aerobic, anoxic and anaerobic) can exist within the biofilm.
To reduce the complexity of the model, some assumptions are necessary. The
limitations of this model concern the hydraulics of the trickling filter and the
biofilm itself. The model assumes that the flow rate and solids loading to the
filter can always be processed; that is, clogging and headlosses through the
filter are not modelled. Also the maximum thickness of the biofilm is not
calculated, rather the user specifies it. This assumption was made because there
are little or no data available for calibration/verification of the maximum film
thickness calculations. It is assumed that there is equal flow distribution over
the entire surface area of the trickling filter and the media inside the trickling
filter. The effect of the rotation speed of the rotary distributor is neglected.
The dimensions of the trickling filter model are larger than the suspended-
growth models since the state variables are now modelled through the film as
well as down through the trickling filter. The suspended-growth models only
considered the state variables along the reactor (1-dimensional). The additional
dimension in the biofilm has some impact on the simulation speed; therefore,
more time is required when using this model. Improvements to the speed of
this model have been made by integrating the state variables with different
frequencies. For example, the particulate components were found to change
more slowly than the soluble components since they are diffusing through the
biofilm. Therefore, the integration of the soluble components was handled
differently from the particulate components (see Figure 7-3).
CONCEPTUAL MODEL
The trickling filter is divided into ‘n’ horizontal sections (default is 6 sections)
each representing a cross-section of the trickling filter at a different depth. The
transfer of the state variables between each of these horizontal sections through
the liquid film is through liquid flow. The biofilm in each of these horizontal
sections is modelled as a number of layers (default is one layer for the liquid
film on top of five layers for the biofilm). The transfer of soluble state variables
between each of these layers is by diffusion only. Particulate variables have a
certain physical volume associated with them and can be displaced into the
neighbouring layer by growth processes. Each layer of the biofilm is modelled
as a CSTR with the same biological reactions as the suspended-growth
biological model (See Appendix A for the mantis model). Attachment and
detachment coefficients are used to provide for a means of transfer of
particulate components between the biofilm surface and the liquid film. This
conceptualization is shown in Figure 7-1. The concentration of each particulate
state variable is converted to volume based on the dry material content of biofilm
and the density of biofilm (both user inputs). When the volume of each layer is
filled (based on maximum biofilm thickness and number of biofilm layers ) the next

layer begins to fill. When the film thickness approaches the specified
maximum, increasing detachment of biofilm will occur.
equivalent
volume
x
trickling filter model representation

Biofilm
layers
liquid
media film
biofilm detail
DO
profile
Figure 7-1 - Conceptual Diagram of the Trickling Filter Model
MATHEMATICAL MODEL
The mathematical equations used within each layer of the biofilm are provided
in the corresponding Model matrix (for example, see Appendix A for the mantis
model). The equation used for the diffusion of the state variables from the bulk
liquid into the biofilm is provided below. The diffusion through the biofilm is
described by Fick's second law and supplemented with biological reactions:
Accumulation in liquid film Liquid flux Diffusion into Air:water exchange (if
Biofilm applicable e.g. for DO)
 dS L 
Aa δ L  ( ) ( )
 = QL S Lj −1 − S Lj − K M Aa S Lj − S BLi
j (
+ K ML Aa S  − S Lj ) (6.1)
 dt 

where:
Aa = surface area of biofilm through which transport is occurring (m 2)

δ L = thickness of attached liquid layer (m)
S jL = substrate conc. in liquid film horizontal section j (mg/L)
t = time (days)
S jBLi = substrate concentration at biofilm liquid interface section j (mg/L)
S o = saturated liquid-film substrate concentration (mg/L)
Q L = volumetric flow rate of attached liquid layer (L/d)
K M = mass transfer coefficient from liquid to biofilm (m/d)
K ML = oxygen transfer coefficient from air to liquid film (m/d)
Accumulation in Diffusion Advection Reduction

Biofilm into biofilm between rate
biofilm layers

∂S
∂t
= − Ds
d 2S
dy 2
(
+ S Bj −1 − S Bj ) AQδ
B
 − RS (6.2)
 B 
where:
A = surface area of attached microorganisms (m 2)

D S = state variable diffusion coefficient (m2/d)
Q B = volumetric flow rate of attached biofilm layer (L/d)
R s = substrate utilization rate (mg/L/d)
S = state variable concentration in layer (mg/L)
S jB = state variable concentration in attached biofilm layer j (mg/L)
t = time (days)
y = thickness of biofilm layer (m)
δL = attached biofilm thickness in layer (m)
MODEL PARAMETERS
This section of the chapter discusses the various model parameters and inputs
that the user would encounter when using this model. The examples and
discussion below pertain to the mantis model in the CN library.

Physical
These menu items are found under the Parameters sub-menu item Physical and
contain both real physical dimensions to describe the actual trickling filter
being modelled, as well as model dimensions which allow the user to specify
how the physical system will be modelled. There are two items under the
heading Speed, which allow the user to optimize the simulation speed of this
model by changing the frequency of integration for the soluble components. As
seen in Figure 7-2, the real dimensions of the trickling filter require inputs such
as: the filter bed depth , filter bed surface and specific surface of media. Together,
these three parameters will provide an estimation of the total biofilm surface
area in the model. The liquid retention time in filter refers to the retention time of
the liquid flowing past the biofilm, the maximum attached liquid film thickness
refers to the liquid film which is not moving past the biofilm due to friction
(no-slip layer) and the maximum biofilm thickness will be reached only with
infinite sloughing. The density of biofilm and dry material content of biofilm are used
to convert the concentration of each state variable to a volume measurement.
Figure 7-2 - Physical Dimensions of the Trickling Filter

The model dimensions are fixed, that is, the number of layers in the biofilm is six
(one liquid layer and five biofilm layers). Also, the number of horizontal and
vertical sections in the model is fixed at six and one respectively.
The next two items in this form, under the heading Speed , concern the
integration of the soluble state variables. Since these variables are diffusing
through the biofilm, and consequently change rapidly when compared to the
particulate state variables, which are changing only due to their growth rates,
they tend to dominate the numerical solver. To increase the speed of
simulation, the soluble states can be integrated less frequently without loss of
accuracy. When the variables are scheduled to be integrated their derivatives
are calculated from equations (6.1) and (6.2) shown above. Otherwise, the
derivatives are set to zero. There are two variables used to specify how
frequently the soluble states are integrated and the duration for integration or
how long the states are integrated for each period: the soluble integration period
and soluble integration length . These concepts are shown in Figure 7-3 with the
results on ammonia shown in Figure 7-4.
period of integration duration of integration
Figure 7-3 Integration of Soluble Components
discrete integration
Ammoni a
continuous integration
Figure 7-4 Integration
Mass Transport
The parameters shown in Figure 7-5 are used for the transport model
(diffusion) of the various components through the biofilm. Since there are
insufficient data in the literature concerning the diffusion of various

components through a biofilm, the values used for the diffusion through water
are reduced by a constant fraction, shown as reduction in diffusion in biofilm . The
default diffusion coefficients shown for water are used for the diffusion of
components from the liquid layer to the first layer (outside) of the biofilm. The
detachment rate and attachment rate are used for calculating the sloughing rate
and particulate components attachment to the biofilm, respectively.
Figure 7-5 Mass Transport Parameters
Figure 7-6 shows more physical components associated with oxygen. The
oxygen mass transfer coefficient is calculated from the physical conditions
within the filter (thickness of biofilm and diffusion rate of oxygen) and is

affected by temperature and the saturated dissolved oxygen concentration

(Chapter 5). These values are either input in the general data entry area or
specifically set for each object as shown in Figure 7-6.
Figure 7-6 Physical Dimensions of the Trickling Filter
Stoichiometric and Kinetic Parameters

The parameters shown in these menus refer to the biological reactions that are
described in Chapter 5.
DISPLAY VARIABLES
In addition to the standard effluent parameters, there are a number of fixed film
specific variables that can be displayed. Figure 7-7 shows the variables
available for display for the trickling filter. They are explained below:
Trickling Filter Variables

This includes the biofilm thickness for each horizontal section from the top to
the bottom of the filter.

Biofilm Profiles
This provides all the state variables plus the suspended solids composite
variable for each horizontal section of the trickling filter (i.e. six profiles for six
horizontal sections). The first layer in the profile is the liquid film, followed by
the biofilm layers (i.e. liquid and maximum of five biofilm layers).
Figure 7-7 Trickling Filter Display Variables
Liquid Film Concentrations

This provides the liquid film state variables for each horizontal section of the
trickling filter, from top (section 1) to bottom (section 6).
2D Variables
This is used for plotting both the filter horizontal sections and biofilm layers
variables using the 3D bar chart or grayscale outputs. Examples are shown in
Figure 7-8. From left to right is the liquid layer and five biofilm layers. In the
3D bar chart, the top of the filter is located in the foreground, and the bottom of
the filter in the background. In the greyscale graph, the six horizontal trickling

filter horizontal sections are shown from top to bottom (i.e. top layer of the
filter is shown at the top of the graph).
Figure 7-8 2D Variables Outputs
Rotating Biological Contactor (RBC) Model
INTRODUCTION
The rotating biological contractor (RBC) model is available in all the libraries,
using the same biological reactions found in the suspended-growth models in
the appropriate library. The model can predict the extent of carbon and nitrogen
removal (by uptake or oxidation) and denitrification, as well as phosphorus
uptake and release (in the CNP library). This model incorporates the growth
kinetics and transport processes for the corresponding state variables. The
profiles of the various components through the biofilm are modelled so that
different environments (aerobic, anoxic and anaerobic) can exist within the
biofilm.
limitations of this model concern the hydraulics of the rotating biological
contactor and the biofilm itself. The model assumes that the flow rate and
solids loading to the RBC can always be processed; that is, clogging and
headloss are not modelled. Also the maximum thickness of the biofilm is not
calculated, rather it is specified by the user. This assumption was primarily
made because there are little or no data available for calibration/verification of
the maximum film thickness calculations. The effect of the rotation speed and
direction of the RBC and its impact on media sloughing and aeration
requirements is neglected.

Similar to the trickling filter model, the RBC is more complex than the
suspended-growth models since the state variables are modelled through the
biofilm as well as through various RBC stages.
CONCEPTUAL MODEL
The rotating biological contactor is divided into ‘n’ stages (default is 1 stage)
each representing a baffled RBC system. The transfer of the state variables
between each of these stages is through the liquid flow. The biofilm in each
stage is modelled as a number of layers (default is one layer as the liquid film
on top of five layers as the biofilm). The transfer of soluble state variables
between each of these layers is by diffusion only. Particulate variables have a
certain physical volume associated with them and can be displaced into the
neighbouring layer by growth processes. Each layer of the biofilm is modelled
as a CSTR with the same biological reactions as the suspended-growth
biological model (See Appendix A for the mantis model). Attachment and
detachment coefficients are used to provide for a means of transfer of
particulate components between the biofilm surface and the liquid film. This
conceptualization is shown in Figure 7-9. The concentration of each particulate
state variable is converted to volume based on the dry material content of
biofilm and its density, both input by the user. When the volume of each
biofilm layer is filled (based on maximum biofilm thickness and number of
biofilm layers) the next layer begins to fill. When the biofilm thickness starts to
approach the specified maximum, increasing detachment of biofilm will occur.
Figure 7-9 Conceptual Diagram of the RBC Model

MATHEMATICAL MODEL
in the corresponding Model matrix (For example, see Appendix A for the
mantis model). The equation used for the diffusion of the state variables from
the bulk liquid into the biofilm is provided in the trickling filter section.
MODEL PARAMETERS
that the user will encounter using this model. The example and discussion
below pertains to the mantis model in the CN library.
Physical
contain both real physical dimensions to describe the actual rotating biological
contactor modelled, as well as model dimensions which allow the user to
specify how the physical system will be modelled. There are two items under
the heading Speed, which allow the user to optimize the simulation speed of
this model by changing the frequency of integration for the soluble
components. As seen in Figure 7-10, the real dimensions of the rotating
biological contactor require inputs such as the rbc liquid volume, the rbc media
volume and the specific surface area of media. Together, these three parameters
provide an estimation of the total biofilm surface area in the model. The
submerged fraction of the biofilm refers to the percent of the RBC submerged at
any given time, the maximum attached liquid film thickness refers to the liquid film
which is considered to be associated with the biofilm due to friction (no-slip
layer), and the maximum biofilm thickness will be reached only with infinite
sloughing. The density of biofilm and dry material content of biofilm are used to
convert the concentration of each state variable to a volume measurement. The
model dimensions include the number of RBC tanks in series or stages. The
model assumes each tank or stage is of equal size. If the stages are of unequal
size (different media density and/or parallel feeding), the user should tie
individual RBC objects together to simulate the process.

Figure 7-10 Physical Dimensions of the RBC
The next two items in this form, under the heading Speed , concern the
integration of the soluble components. Since these components are diffusing
particulate components, which are changing only due to their growth rates, they
tend to dominate the numerical solver. To increase the speed of simulation, it
was found that these components can be integrated less frequently without loss
of accuracy. When the soluble variables are scheduled to be integrated, their
derivatives are calculated from equations (6.1) and (6.2). Otherwise, the
derivatives are set to zero. There are two variables which are used to specify
how frequently the states are integrated: the soluble integration period , and the
duration for integration or how long the states are integrated for each period

(soluble integration length ). These concepts are shown in Figure 7-3, with the
results for ammonia shown in Figure 7-4.
Figure 7-11 shows more physical components associated with oxygen

solubility. The oxygen mass transfer coefficient is calculated from the physical
conditions within the filter (thickness of biofilm and diffusion rate of oxygen)
and are affected by temperature and the saturated dissolved oxygen
concentration. These values are either input in the general data entry area or
specifically set for each object.
Figure 7-11 Physical Dimensions of the RBC
Mass Transport
The parameters shown in Figure 7-5 are used by the RBC for the transport
model (diffusion) of the various components through the biofilm. Since there
are insufficient data in the literature concerning the diffusion of various
are reduced by a constant fraction, shown as reduction in diffusion in biofilm.
The default diffusion coefficients shown for water are used for the diffusion of
rate of detachment and attachment is used for calculating the sloughing rate
and particulate components attachment to the biofilm.


DISPLAY VARIABLES
specific variables that can be displayed. These are accessed through the object's
Display Variables menu item.
• RBC variables (See Trickling Filter Variables in the Trickling Filter Model
section)
• Liquid concentrations(See Liquid Film Concentrations in the Trickling
Filter Model section)
• 2D variables (See 2D Variables in the Trickling Filter Model section).
Submerged Biological Contactor (SBC) Model
INTRODUCTION
The submerged biological contactor (SBC) model is a modification of the RBC
model for units that are air driven or are provided with supplemental aeration.
Units with supplemental aeration tend to be more submerged than conventional
RBCs (conventional RBCs are generally 40 percent submerged) providing
additional contact of the media with the influent, since the unit is not dependent
on ambient air for oxygen.
The SBC model discussed herein is available in all the libraries, using the same
biological reactions found in the suspended-growth models in the appropriate
library. The model can predict the extent of carbon and nitrogen removal (by
uptake or oxidation) and denitrification, as well as phosphorus uptake and
release (in the carbon-nitrogen-phosphorus library). This model incorporates
the growth kinetics and transport processes for the corresponding state
variables. The profiles of the various components through the biofilm are
modelled so that different environments (aerobic, anoxic and anaerobic) can
exist within the biofilm.
limitations of this model concern the hydraulics of the submerged biological
contactor and the biofilm itself. The model assumes that the flow rate and
solids loading to the SBC can always be processed; that is, clogging and
headloss is not modelled. The maximum thickness of the biofilm is not
calculated, rather it is specified by the user. This assumption was made because

there are little or no data available for calibration/verification of the maximum

film thickness calculations. It is assumed that there is equal flow distribution
over the entire surface area of the SBC and the media inside the SBC. The
effect of the rotation speed or direction of the SBC and its impact on media
sloughing is neglected. The oxygen diffused into the biofilm when the media is
in the air is neglected, since the SBC media is generally submerged more than
80 percent of the time. Therefore, the SBC is modelled as completely
submerged.
Similar to the trickling filter model and the RBC, the SBC is more complex
than the suspended-growth models since the state variables are now modelled
through the film and through various SBC stages (or shafts).
CONCEPTUAL MODEL
The submerged biological contactor is divided into a number of stages (default
is 2 stages) each representing a baffled SBC shaft. The transfer of the state
variables between each of these stages is through the liquid flow. The biofilm
in each stage is modelled as a number of layers (default is one layer as the
liquid film on top of five layers as the biofilm). The transfer of soluble state
variables between each of these layers is by diffusion. Particulate variables
have a certain physical volume associated with them and can be displaced into
the neighbouring layer by growth processes. Each layer of the biofilm is
modelled as a CSTR with the same biological reactions as the suspended-
growth biological model (See Appendix A for the mantis model). Attachment
and detachment coefficients are used to provide for a means of transfer of
particulate components between the biofilm surface and the liquid film. For the
SBC the process is the same as the RBC (conceptually shown in Figure 7-9).
The concentration of each particulate state variable is converted to volume
based on the dry material content of biofilm and its density input by the user.
When the volume of each layer is filled (based on maximum biofilm thickness
and number of biofilm layers) the next layer begins to fill. When the film
thickness starts to approach the specified maximum, increasing detachment of
biofilm will occur.
MATHEMATICAL MODEL
in the corresponding Model matrix (for example, see Appendix A for the mantis
model). The equation used for the diffusion of the state variables from the bulk
liquid into the biofilm is provided in the trickling filter section.
MODEL PARAMETERS
This section of the chapter discusses the model parameters and inputs that the
user will encounter using this model, in particular those different from the other

fixed film models. The example and discussion below pertains to the mantis
model in the Carbon - Nitrogen (CN) library.
Physical
These menu items are found under Parameters > Physical , and contain both real
physical dimensions to describe the actual submerged biological contactor
being modelled, and model dimensions which allow the user to specify how the
physical system will be modelled. there are two items under the heading Speed ,
which allow the user to optimize the simulation speed of this model by
changing the frequency of integration for the soluble components.
As seen in Figure 7-12, the real dimensions of the submerged biological

contactor require inputs such as:
1) tanks in series ;
2) volume set up method ;
3) SBC liquid volume in tanks ;
4) SBC media volume in tanks ;
5) SBC total volume;
6) SBC total media volume;
7) volume fractions ; and
8) specific surface of media which will provide an estimation of the total

biofilm surface area in the model.
Based on the volume set up method (input 2), the user either specifies the
individual volumes per tank (inputs 3 and 4), or the volume fractions based on
the total volumes (inputs 5, 6 and 7). The latter two items are used to convert
the concentration of each state variable to a volume measurement. Model
dimensions include the number of SBC tanks in series or stages.

Figure 7-12 Physical Dimension of the SBC
Biofilm characteristics include:
1) maximum attached liquid film thickness , which refers to the liquid film which
is considered to be associated with the biofilm due to friction (no-slip
layer);
2) maximum biofilm thickness , which will be reached with infinite sloughing;
3) density of biofilm ; and
4) dry material content of biofilm .
The next two items in this form under the heading Speed , concern the
integration of the soluble components. Since these components are diffusing
particulate components, which are changing only due to their growth rates, they
dominate the numerical solver. To increase the speed of simulation, it was
found that these components could be integrated less frequently without loss of
accuracy. When the soluble variables are scheduled to be integrated their

derivatives are calculated as normal. Otherwise, the derivatives are set to zero.
There are two variables which are used to specify how frequently the states are
integrated (Soluble integration period ) and the duration for integration or how
long the states are integrated for each period (Soluble integration length ). These
concepts are shown in Figure 7-3, with the results for ammonia shown in
Figure 7-4.
The oxygen mass transfer coefficient is calculated from the physical conditions
within the filter (thickness of biofilm and diffusion rate of oxygen) and is
affected by temperature and the saturated dissolved oxygen concentration.
These values are input in the general data entry area or specifically set for each
object as shown in this screen.
Figure 7-13 Physical Dimensions of the SBC (More…)
Operational
The operational parameters are similar to the activated sludge model
(See Chapter 5). Like the activated sludge model, the aeration method can be
chosen as either “Enter KLa” or “Enter Airflow”. No mechanical method is
provided since this method is not appropriate for the SBC. For details on the
modelling of the oxygen transfer see Chapter 5.

Mass Transport
The parameters shown in Figure 7-5 are used by the SBC for the transport
model (diffusion) of the various components through the biofilm. Since there
are insufficient data in the literature concerning the diffusion of various
are reduced by a constant fraction, shown as reduction in diffusion in biofilm.
The default diffusion coefficients shown for water are used for the diffusion of
rate of detachment and attachment is used for calculating the sloughing rate
and particulate components attachment to the biofilm.

DISPLAY VARIABLES
specific variables that can be displayed. They are the same as the trickling
filter. These are accessed through the following subheadings:
• SBC profiles (Trickling Filter Variables in the Trickling Filter Model

section)
• Liquid concentrations(See Liquid Film Concentrations in the Trickling
Filter Model section)
• 2D variables (See 2D Variables in the Trickling Filter Model section).
Biological Aerated Filter (BAF) Model

The biological aerated filter (BAF) model is a robust, mechanistically based model. It
uses the same biological reactions found in the suspended-growth models discussed in
Chapter 5.
CONCEPTUAL MODEL
The model consists of four major components: hydraulics and filter operation,
filtration, biological reactions, and a biofilm. They are described in the
following.
Hydraulics and Filter Operation

The model needs to be able to describe the complex operation of the biofilter
stages each consisting of one or more units in different operating modes.

In the simplest implementation (number of units is 1); the model simulates the
behavior of a single BAF unit. This unit can be in filtration, standby,
backwash, or flush mode. In filtration, standby and flush mode, the filter is
represented hydraulically as a tank consisting of a certain number of horizontal
sections (6 in the default case). The actual filtration bed is preceded by a mixed
tank without filter material to describe the dilution effects of the volume of
water under the filter bed. A similar mixed tank is added to account for the
liquid on top of the filter media. In backwash mode the horizontal sections of
the filter are combined and converted to one mixed tank. The model assumes
that during backwash the filter media is ideally mixed.
The influent loading to the filter determines if the filter is in filtration, standby,
backwash, or flush mode. In filtration and flushed modes, flow is entering the
filter through the input stream and coming out through the output stream. In
standby mode, there is no flow through the filter. In backwash mode, flow is
entering the filter through the backwash input stream and coming out through
the backwash output stream.
A complex biofilter plant could be represented by the proper number of

individual filter units placed on the drawing board to describe the changing
conditions in the plant and forecast effluent quality. Due to the level of
complexity within one filter unit and the typical number of units in the plant
this approach is not feasible even with substantial computing capacity. Since
the difference between individual units operating in the same mode is not
drastic, a simplified operation mode provides a good approximation of
operating and effluent conditions with substantially less overhead.
For this purpose the hydraulics of the filter (which now can be thought of as a
series of units) is described in three different ways. A certain fraction of the
total number of units is in filtration mode, i.e. layered with influent flowing
through them. Another fraction is in standby mode, with light aeration and no
influent loading. A third fraction is in backwash mode. The sum of the three
fractions adds up to the total number of units. At times any one of these
fractions may be completely missing, i.e. the number of units in backwash or
standby mode can be zero. In GPS-X, the individual fractions are specified in
two ways:
As constants. This allows a simple run when the number of units in standby
mode does not change. When a particular backwash criterion is reached, a
certain number (user specified) of units in filtration mode are backwashed. This
mode can be used if an actual operation of a filter plant is recorded and has to
be replayed in GPS-X. The number of units can be read in through the GPS-X
file input facility and the original loading conditions recreated.

As volume fractions which vary according to a target load on the filter

component. This way the ratio of the operating filter volume and the standby
volume changes continuously according to changes in influent load. This
operation mimics a "constant loading" operational policy, although the loading
is completely constant on the filter volume because the limitation created by
the individual biofilter unit volumes are ignored.
During the simulation when volume fractions in different operating modes

change, the model correctly keeps track of mass balances by recalculating the
mass of all model components currently in that element. As an example
consider the event of one standby unit coming on-line due to increasing load on
the filter. The other elements in the filter, which have been in operation, may
contain much higher active biomass than one, which has been on standby for a
period of time. When the standby component comes on-line, a volume
weighted average biomass concentration is calculated for the new, increased
filter volume for all horizontal sections and all biofilm layers, and integration
continues using the new conditions.
Filtration Component
The modified Iwasaki equation (Horner et al., 1986) was used to calculate the
filtration rate, while headloss is calculated according to the Kozeny equation.
In the filtration mode, the number of horizontal sections is determined by the
plug flow characteristics of the BAF bed (6 by default). This component of the
model is used in predicting solids capture, effluent suspended solids and other
constituents and backwash quality. In backwash mode, the backwashed fraction
of the bed is treated as an ideally mixed tank; biofilm layers are retained.
The filtration element of the model is available without the biological reactions
in the current sand-filter model in GPS-X described in Chapter 9 (simple1d
model).
Biological Reactions Component

The BAF unit uses the same biological reactions found in the suspended-
growth models in the appropriate library. The mantis model has been
successfully used in several biofilm configurations by Hydromantis, and is able
to predict ammonia and BOD profiles in the reactor and in the biofilm. For
more specific information on biological models, please consult Chapter 5.
Biofilm Component
The existing biofilm model in GPS-X is based on Spengel and Dzombak
(1992). This model was adapted to the BAF configuration. The model handles
soluble material diffusion, biofilm growth, and particulate attachment and

detachment. Details are described in the Trickling Filter Model section of this
chapter.
MATHEMATICAL MODEL
in the corresponding Model matrix (see Appendix A for the mantis model). The
equations used for the diffusion of the state variables from the bulk liquid into
the biofilm are provided in the Trickling Filter Section of this chapter. The
equations used for the filtration component are provided in Chapter 9 (simple1d
model).
MODEL PARAMETERS
This section discusses the various model parameters and inputs that the user
will encounter when using this model.
Physical
The physical parameters are found under the Parameters sub-menu item
Physical . It contains physical dimensions to describe the actual BAF being
modelled, and model dimensions, which allow the user to specify how the
physical system will be modelled. There are three items under the heading
Speed, which allow the user to optimize the simulation speed of this model.
As seen in Figure 7-14, the unit dimensions of the BAF require inputs such as
the single filter bed surface area, the total filter bed depth from support , the media fill
(empty bed depth) (the difference between the last 2 inputs giving the water
height above the media), and the water height below support . The number of units
makes the simplified multiple units operation possible.
The next section of this form, media, includes inputs to characterize the media
being used in the filter: specific surface of media together with the filter bed depth
and surface area provides an estimation of the total biofilm surface area in the
model; equivalent particle diameter , where multi-media filters can be described;
clean bed porosity (void space); and ultimate bulk biofilm volume, the maximum
space the biofilm can take up before completely clogging the filter.
The next two items under the Biofilm heading, density of biofilm and dry material
content of biofilm , are used to convert the concentration of each state variable to
a volume measurement. The Model Dimensions section includes the number of
sections in filter , the model assumes each horizontal section is of equal size.
Figure 7-14 shows physical components associated with oxygen solubility and
model speed. The oxygen mass transfer coefficient is calculated from the
physical conditions within the filter (thickness of biofilm and diffusion rate of

oxygen) and is affected by the liquid and air temperatures, and the oxygen
fraction in air (See Chapter 5). These values are input in the general data entry
area or specifically set for each object as shown in this screen. The first two
items under the heading Speed concern the integration of the soluble
components, which is described in the Trickling Filter Model section of this
chapter. The third item, calculate DO in liquid , is used to improve the speed of
simulation if the BAF installation maintains a relatively high level of DO in the
liquid (close to saturation). By setting this parameter to OFF, a constant DO
level is maintained in the liquid and integration of the DO state variable is
bypassed, thereby speeding up the simulation. The constant DO level can be
adjusted in the initial conditions form (Process Data > Initialization > initial
concentrations ).
Figure 7-14 BAF Physical Parameters
Operational
In the first part of the Operational menu item, aeration constants are available
similar to all aerated biological units. Specific to the BAF is the ability to
specify a different KLa (or air flow, if the aeration method is set to diffused)

for each of the filter operational states (active, standby, flushed, or

backwashed). These parameters are shown in Figure 7-15.
Figure 7-15 BAF Operational Parameters
The entry under the Cycles heading, backwash operation , is used to set up the
method by which a backwash operation will be initiated when operating the
filter(s). The backwash operation can be time-based , headloss-based , effluent quality
based , or manual. The filter can be operated in single unit mode (the whole
volume will be in filter, backwash, standby or flushed mode), or multiple unit
operation. In multiple unit operation (if the number of units is greater than one),
the number of units in filter mode can be specified, and the remaining units are in
standby mode. The number of simultaneously backwashed units will be taken out of
the filtration mode and replaced with standby units when a backwash operation
is initiated if the constant filter loading rate controller is on. The target loading rate
on the filter fraction can be specified and thus the volume of filter in filtration
mode will vary to maintain the target loading rate.
This form contains further information about the backwash operation.

Backwash can be initiated after a certain period (e.g. every 24 hours), or after a
maximum allowable headloss is achieved (e.g. 1 m), or when the effluent solids

reach a threshold level (e.g. 10 g/m3). This last mode may be useful for
optimizing plant performance in the mathematical model. In manual mode, the
operation of the BAF has to be done through a Control window (or file input),
which needs to be set up with all the operational variables.
Further model parameters are included in the mass transport , stoichiometric ,

kinetic and filtration menu items in the BAF model. As these forms are described
in the Trickling Filter Model section of this chapter and in the Sand Filter
Models developed in Chapter 9 they are not discussed again here.
Figure 7-16 More BAF Operational Parameters
DISPLAY VARIABLES
Hydraulics
Here, hydraulic information can be accessed and displayed for each of the
horizontal filter sections (6 by default). It includes dilution rate and headloss-
related variables: Reynolds number, friction factor, and headloss in each
horizontal filter section for both clean and dirty filter beds.

2D BAF
The solids capture rate during filtration can be displayed for each of the
horizontal filter sections. The other variables (O2 partial pressure, pore size,
biofilm thickness, deposit concentration, bulk deposit volume) can be displayed
on 3D graphs. The x-axis has the 6 horizontal filter sections, the y-axis has the
5 biofilm layers and liquid phase, and the z-axis displays the variable value.
Filter Segment
The state variables and the solids composite variable can be displayed on 3D
graphs. The x-axis has the 6 horizontal filter sections, the y-axis has the 5
biofilm layers and liquid phase, and the z-axis displays the variable value.
Liquid Film Concentration in Filter Part

In this form, the state variables and unattached solids composite variable values
in the liquid phase can be selected for display for each of the horizontal filter
sections. The values displayed are only valid for the BAF units in filtration
mode.
Variables in Backwashed Segment

In this form, the state variables can be selected for display for each of the
biofilm layers. The values displayed are only valid for the units in backwash
mode, and represent the average of all horizontal filter sections since in
filtration mode; the filter is treated as a completely mixed tank.
Hybrid-System
The Hybrid-System model in GPS-X is based on a combination of the standard plug flow
tank configuration with suspended growth biomass, and the GPS-X biofilm model
representing fixed film growth on the media inserted into the tank. Any type of media
will be represented in the model as long as the specific surface area is set correctly. Thus
the model is able to represent commercial systems such as MBBR, Ringlace, Captor,
Bionet and other types of hybrid systems, whether they contain sludge recycle or not.
Biological Component
The hybrid-system uses the same biological reactions found in the suspended-
growth models. For more specific information on biological models, please
consult Chapter 5.
Biofilm Component
(1992). This model was adapted to the hybrid-system. The model handles

soluble material diffusion, biofilm growth, and particulate attachment and

detachment. Details are described in the Trickling Filter Model section of this
chapter.
MODEL PARAMETERS
that the user will encounter when using this model.
Physical
Physical . It contains physical dimensions to describe the hybrid-system, and
model dimensions which allow the user to specify how the physical system will
be modelled.
The hybrid-system requires inputs such as the specific surface of media, the water
displaced by media, and the specific density of media.
Operational
In the Operational form, aeration constants are available similar to all aerated
biological units. Specific to the hybrid-system is the ability to specify two
additional recycle streams. These streams are internal recycle with carrier (if
internal recycle carries carrier with it) and flow from tank # with carrier (if the
carrier can flow from one cell to the next one).
Further model parameters are included in the mass transport , stoichiometric and
kinetic menu items in the hybrid-system model. As these forms are described in
the Trickling Filter Model section of this chapter they are not discussed again
here.
INITIALIZATION
In addition to the standard initial volume input, the hybrid-system requires the
reactor portion filled by media (media or empty bed fill), which can be input in the
Initial Volume sub-menu form.
DISPLAY VARIABLES
display variables menu item.

Denitrification filter
The denitrification filter objects are found in the “Tertiary Treatment” group of objects,
rather than in the “Attached Growth” group, as the other biofilm objects.
The denitrification filter model is similar to the trickling filter model in hydraulic
structure. There are, however, a few fundamental differences:
1) The filter is assumed to be entirely flooded. There is no empty void space

between media, as in the trickling filter model.
2) The trickling filter model is assumed to be downflow, whereas there are two
different denitrification filter models: upflow and downflow, as shown in Figure
7-17.
Figure 7-17 Upflow and Downflow Denitrification Filter Objects
Biological Component
The denitrification filter model uses the same biological reactions found in the
suspended-growth models. For more specific information on biological models,
please consult Chapter 5.
Biofilm Component
(1992). This model was adapted for use in the attached-growth objects such as
the trickling filter and denitrification filters. The model handles soluble
material diffusion, biofilm growth, and particulate attachment and detachment.
Details are described in the Trickling Filter Model section of this chapter.
Filtration Component
The filtration of solids is modeled as a simple capture of the particulate state variables
from the effluent layer of the denitrification filter (bottom layer in the downflow filter and top
layer in the upflow filter). Users specify a capture fraction, and all solids captured are removed
through the backwash connection stream. Backwashing (and its associated removal of solids) is
modeled as a continuous process flow.

MODEL PARAMETERS
that the user will encounter when using this model.
Physical
Physical . It contains physical dimensions to describe the denitrification filter,
and model dimensions which allow the user to specify how the physical system
will be modelled.
The denitrification filter requires inputs such as the specific surface of media and
the porosity of media.
Operational
The operational menu contains three parameters that define the removal of
solids via backwash. The solids capture fraction defines the fraction of
particulate state variables (on a concentration basis) that is removed from the
effluent stream. The parameters backwash duration during 24-hr period and
backwash flow are used to determine the total amount of flow leaving through
the backwash connection point per day. The backwash concentration is
calculated as the total amount of captured solids divided by the daily backwash
flow rate.
Other Menus
Further model parameters are included in the mass transport , stoichiometric and
kinetic menu items in the denitrification filter model. As these forms are
described in the Trickling Filter Model section of this chapter.
INITIALIZATION
The initialization menu of the denitrification filter object is the same as for the
trickling filter object, and contains the initial concentrations of the state
variables in each layer of the filter.
DISPLAY VARIABLES
display variables menu item.

Sedimentation and Flotation Models 231
CHAPTER 8
Sedimentation and Flotation Models
This chapter provides a description of the sedimentation and flotation models available in
GPS-X.
Sedimentation Models
Sedimentation is one of the most important unit processes in activated sludge treatment
plants. The sedimentation unit, whether it is a primary settler, secondary clarifier, or
sludge thickener, provides two functions: clarification and thickening. The primary
settlers and sludge thickeners are designed and operated to take advantage of the
thickening process, while the secondary clarifiers are designed and operated to take
advantage of the clarification process.
In GPS-X, the sedimentation models are either zero- (point) or one-dimensional (1d
suffix), and either reactive (mantis, asm1...) or nonreactive (simple). The following models
are available:
Zero-dimensional, nonreactive: point
One-dimensional, nonreactive: simple1d
One-dimensional, reactive: mantis , asm1, asm2d , asm3, newgeneral .
In reactive models, biological reactions are included, and the model names are associated
with the corresponding suspended-growth models described in Chapter 5. For example,
the mantis sedimentation model uses the mantis suspended-growth model.
ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODELS
In the one-dimensional models, the settler is divided into a number of layers
(10 by default) of equal thickness, as depicted in Figure 8-1.

232 Sedimentation and Flotation Models
(Qi+Qr)Xi Qi X1=QiXeffluent
top layer 1
2
3
4
5
feed layer 6
7
8
9
bottom layer 10
QrX10 =QrXr ecycle
Figure 8-1 One-Dimensional Sedimentation Model
The following assumptions are made:
1. Incoming solids are distributed instantaneously and uniformly across the

entire cross-sectional area of the feed layer.
2. Only vertical flow is considered.
The models are based on the solids flux concept: a mass balance is performed
around each layer, providing for the simulation of the solids profile throughout
the settling column under both steady-state and dynamic conditions.
Table 8-1 shows the appropriate contribution of each layer of the settler to the
mass balance. There are five different groups of layers, depending on their
position relative to the feed point. This is shown schematically in Figure 8-2.

Table 8-1 Sedimentation Model: Input-Output Summary

Input Output
Bulk Liquid Bulk Liquid
Layer Feed Settling Settling
Flux Flux
Top - - up + up
Layers above feed point - + up + up
Feed + + - + up-down
Layers below feed point - + down + down
Bottom - + down - down
Note: + = phenomenon considered; - = phenomenon not considered
Bulk QiX1 Gravity

Movement - Settling
top layer 1
Jup,2 =
Qi X2 + -
Ac - +
layers 2
above the
feed layer -
+
- +
feed 4
layer
- -
+ +
layers 5
below the
feed layer - -
+ +
bottom 10
layer
- Q rX
Figure 8-2 Solids Balance Around the Settler Layers

The models are based on traditional solids flux analysis, but the solids flux in a
particular layer is limited by what can be handled by the adjacent layer.

The solids flux due to bulk movement of the liquid is a straightforward

calculation based on the solids concentration times the liquid bulk velocity,
which is up or down depending on its position relative to the feed layer.
The solids flux due to sedimentation is specified by a double exponential

settling function, applicable to both hindered sedimentation and flocculant
sedimentation conditions. The settling function, described by Takács et al.
(1991), is given by:
− rhin • X j − rfloc • X j
vsj = vmax e − vmax e (8.1)
where:
vsj is the settling velocity in layer j (m/d)

vmax is the maximum Vesilind settling velocity (m/d)
rhin is the hindered zone settling parameter (m 3/gTSS)
rfloc is the flocculant zone settling parameter (m 3/gTSS)
X jo =X j - X min, where X min is the minimum attainable suspended solids
concentration, X j is the suspended solids concentration in layer j.
The minimum attainable solids concentration in a layer, Xmin, is calculated as a

fraction (non-settleable fraction or fns) of the influent solids concentration to the
settler:
X min = fns * X in (8.2)
It is subject to a maximum value specified by the user; the maximum non-

settleable solids or Xminmax. The settling velocity is lower bounded to zero, so
that if the user specifies parameter values that would result in settling velocities
becoming negative, a warning message is printed in the simulation Log
window. The settling velocity is also subject to a maximum value specified by
the user; the maximum settling velocity or vbnd.
The settling function is shown in Figure 8-3. The four regions depicted in this
figure are explained as follows: I) the settling velocity equals zero, as the solids
attain the minimum attainable concentration; II) the settling velocity is
dominated by the flocculating nature of the particles; thus the settling velocity
is sensitive to the rfloc parameter; III) settling velocity has become independent
of solids concentration (particles have reached their maximum size; and IV)
settling velocity is affected by hindering and becomes dependent on the rhin
parameter (the model reduces to the Vesilind equation).

vma x
vbnd
I II III IV
Xmin
Concentration (X)
Figure 8-3 Settling Velocity vs. Concentration
Simple Models
In the simple1d sedimentation model, the only numerically integrated variable is
the suspended solids concentration. This model can be used when biological
reactions in the settler can be ignored. The concentrations of particulate state
variables in the influent to the settler (heterotrophic organisms, etc.) are stored
as fractions of the total suspended solids concentration entering the settler.
Once the model completes the numerical integration of the suspended solids in
the settler layers (at the end of each numerical integration time step), the
concentrations of particulate state variables in the effluent, underflow (RAS),
and pumped flow (WAS) are restored using those fractions. The concentrations
of soluble state variables are not changed in the simple1d model.
COMMON FEATURES
Common features of the sedimentation models are discussed in this section.
Sludge Blanket Threshold Concentration

This variable is used to define the sludge blanket height for display purposes. If
the concentration in a settler layer is above this threshold value (searching from
top to bottom layer), then the sludge blanket is defined as the height of that
layer.

Critical Sludge Blanket Level

This parameter is used to define the height of the sludge blanket in order for the
dissolved oxygen in the underflow and pumped streams to be zero.
Soluble and Particulate Components

The soluble state variables in the nonreactive models are subject to a complete
mix zone, unlike the particulate components, which move from layer to layer.
If the user wishes to subject the soluble components to a number of tanks in
series, then they must select a reactive type settler. In this case all of the state
variables are transported from cell to cell according to the bulk fluid motion
(but only the particulate components will be affected by a settling term). The
feed layer then will become an important term in fixing the number of layers in
series through which the soluble components will flow.
Correlation to Sludge Volume Index and Clarification

A feature of the sedimentation models in GPS-X (secondary clarifiers only) is
the correlation provided between the settling parameters and Sludge Volume
Index (SVI) measurements.
The SVI test characterizes the sedimentation, which occurs in the high solids
concentration band of a clarifier. To specify the sedimentation characteristics
over the full concentration spectrum, another parameter, the Clarification factor,
is needed to specify the settling behavior in the flocculant or low solids
concentration regions. This factor is a relative clarification index; a high
number (1.0) indicates good clarification and a low number (0.1) indicates poor
clarification. The correlation equations are:
(
v max = fcorr1 + ( fcorr 2 ⋅ SVI ) + fcorr 3 ⋅ SVI 2 ) (8.3)
(
rhin = fcorr 4 + ( fcorr 5 ⋅ SVI ) + fcorr 6 ⋅ SVI 2 ) (8.4)
rfloc = fcorr 7 + ( fcorr 8 ⋅ clarif ) + ( fcorr 9 ⋅ clarif ) 2
(8.5)
where:
vmax is the maximum Vesilind settling velocity (m/d)

rhin is the hindered zone settling parameter (m 3/gTSS)
rfloc is the flocculant zone settling parameter (m 3/gTSS)
SVI is the Sludge Volume Index (mL/g)
clarif is the Clarification factor
fcorr1, fcorr2, ..., fcorr9 are the SVI correlation coefficients

To use the correlation, the user must set the parameter use SVI to estimate settling
parameters to ON. The Sludge Volume Index and Clarification parameters can then
be specified and the settling parameters are calculated automatically by GPS-X.
The correlation coefficients can be accessed in the Options > General Data >
System > Parameters > Miscellaneous form.
Please note: The default values of the correlation factors are for SVI. A
correlation with SSVI has not been performed. The default values of the
correlation coefficients are based on five sewage treatment plants.
Influent Flow Distribution

The sedimentation models will account for hydraulic effects caused by an
increase in influent flow. Flow conditions are considered normal when the
influent flow divided by the surface area is less than the quiescent zone maximum
upflow velocity specified by the user. The load to the settler under normal flow
conditions enters the settler at the feed layer. However, as the influent flow
increases, the load to the settler is distributed to the layers below the feed point.
When the upflow velocity in the settler surpasses the complete mix maximum
upflow velocity specified by the user, the entire load enters the bottom of the
settler.
When the upflow velocity is between the quiescent zone maximum upflow velocity
and complete mix maximum upflow velocity, a smooth transition of feed distribution
between the low loading case and the high loading case is generated. An
average (medium) loading condition is initially calculated where the upflow
velocity (vuavg) is the average of the quiescent zone maximum upflow velocity
(vumin) and the complete mix maximum upflow velocity (vumax). At this hydraulic
loading, the input distribution is equal to the feed layer and all layers below.
Smooth distribution is achieved by two linear interpolations. The first

interpolation is between vumin and vuavg. At vumin, the influent fraction to the
feed layer is 1.0 (all flow enters the feed layer), while at vuavg the influent
fraction to the feed layer is 1.0 divided by the number of layers below the feed
layer (including the feed layer itself). Once the influent fraction to the feed
layer is calculated, the remaining flow is equally distributed to the layers
below.
A similar algorithm will ensure smooth flow distribution above vuavg. The
algorithm first calculates the feed fraction to the bottom layer. If vu is higher
than vuavg, then the algorithm distributes the rest evenly.
This procedure of flow distribution is modelling the feed distribution to the

settler by the influent baffle. The feed distribution is shown in Figure 8-4.
During higher flows, the momentum of the incoming flow tends to carry the
load further past the bottom edge of the influent baffle, effectively changing the

feed point in the settler. The flow distribution aspect of the model captures this
phenomenon.
feed layer
Normal flow: load into feed layer
feed layer
Higher flow: load distributed into

layers below feed.
feed layer
bottom layer
Very high flow: load into bottom layer
Figure 8-4 Load Distributed into Settler

Types of Settlers/Clarifiers
There are four types of settler objects in GPS-X:
• rectangular primary
• circular primary
• rectangular secondary
• circular secondary
All of the settler objects contain the same settling model (described above). The
difference between primary and secondary clarifiers are the default settling parameters
and the SVI correlation (SVI correlation is not used in the primary settlers).
The difference between the circular and rectangular configurations is restricted to the
specification of the area and/or geometry of the tanks. The rectangular tanks require only
a total surface area for input, whereas the circular tanks have several shapes available.
CIRCULAR SETTLER CONFIGURATIONS

There are 4 different circular settler shapes available in the circular primary
and secondary settler objects, as shown in Figure 8-5.
Flat-bottom
Sloping-bottom Conical Circular Wedge
Figure 8-5 Circular Settler Shapes

Flotation Model
This section of the chapter describes the flotation model (simple1d) associated with the
DAF unit.
The flotation model is closely related to the one-dimensional sedimentation model. It is

partly based on the double-exponential function, but the model is inverted to promote
flotation of solids as opposed to sedimentation of solids. The flotation model includes a
solids flux component to account for floating of solids. This floating component is
primarily controlled by an air-to-solids ratio and a polymer dosage, specified by the user.
ONE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL
The one-dimensional flotation model will predict the amount of solids removal
achieved by the DAF unit. Solids are removed from the top of the unit in the
float stream. Effluent is removed from the bottom of the DAF unit in the
effluent stream. The one-dimensional flotation model is primarily based on the
solids flux theory presented previously in this chapter, but it is modified to
account for flotation as opposed to sedimentation. The major difference
between the flotation and sedimentation models is the direction of solids flux
and the parameters controlling it.
In the one-dimensional flotation model, the DAF unit is divided into a number
of layers (10 by default) of equal thickness, depicted in Figure 8-6.
The following assumptions are made:
1) Incoming solids are distributed instantaneously and uniformly across the

entire cross-sectional area of the feed layer.
2) Only vertical flow is considered.

Qscum X1 =Qscum Xscum
1 top layer
2
3
4
Qin Xin 5
6 feed layer
7
8
9
10 bottom layer
(Qin -Qscum )X10 =Qout Xout
Figure 8-6 Layered Flotation Model
The model is based on the solids flux concept: a mass balance is performed
around each layer, providing for the simulation of the solids profile throughout
the DAF unit under both steady-state and dynamic conditions.
The model is based on traditional solids flux analysis, with an additional

component for flotation. Model detail is provided in the previous section of this
chapter devoted to one-dimensional sedimentation models.
The solids flux due to the bulk movement of the liquid is calculated by
multiplying the solids concentration by the liquid bulk velocity (flow divided
by area), which may be up or down depending on the position relative to the
feed layer.
The solids flux due to flotation is specified by the same double exponential
function used for sedimentation (Equation 8.1). The parameters within
Equation 8.1 are altered to account for effects of flotation:
vsj is the floating velocity in layer j (m/d)

vmax is the floating velocity with optimal air-to-solids ratio (m/d)
rhin is the hindered zone floating parameter (m 3/gTSS)
rflo is the free floating zone floating parameter (m 3/gTSS)

X jo =X j - X min, where X min is the minimum attainable suspended solids

concentration, X j is the suspended solids concentration in layer j.
The minimum attainable solids concentration in a layer, Xmin, is calculated as a
fraction (non-floatable fraction of fns) of the influent solids concentration to the
DAF unit:
X min = fns * X in (8.6)
It is subject to a maximum value specified by the user, the maximum non-

floatable solids or X minmax. The floating velocity is lower bounded to zero, so
that if the user specifies parameter values that would result in floating
velocities becoming negative, a warning message is printed in the simulation
Log window. The floating velocity is also subject to a maximum value specified
by the user, the maximum floating velocity or vbnd.
MODEL PARAMETERS
This section of the chapter contains a description of the various model
parameters and inputs that the user encounters when using the flotation model.
Physical
These menu items are found under the Parameters sub-menu item Physical . This
input form contains the actual physical dimensions of the DAF unit being
modelled, including the tank surface area, the maximum water level or height of
the tank, and the location of the feed point relative to the bottom of the tank.
The fourth item on the form allows the user to define the number of equivalent
layers contained within the model. The physical parameter form is shown in
Figure 8-7.
Figure 8-7 Physical Parameters for the DAF Unit

Operational
The operational parameters for the DAF unit are located within the Parameters
sub-menu item Operational . This input form contains the polymer dosage (g
polymer/kg solids) and the air-to-solids ratio (g air/g solids) for daily operation
of the DAF unit. The maximum float flow is an upper boundary limit for the
amount of float that can be removed from the DAF unit. The operational input
form is shown in Figure 8-8.
Figure 8-8 Operational Parameters for the DAF Unit
Under the sub-heading other parameters , the optimal polymer dosage and optimal
air-to-solids ratio are defined. These two values provide an estimate of the best
expected solids condition. The optimal values may be expressed based on past
operating experience with the actual DAF unit or may be provided through
manufacturer literature. The dry material content of the float at the optimal
polymer dosage is defined as a percentage. The dry material content of the float
without polymer dosage is also defined. The model will use the range between
these two values to predict the dry material content of the float under actual
operating conditions.
Flotation
The Flotation parameters, shown in Figure 8-9, are used to define the variables
contained within the model (Equation 8.1). The maximum floating velocity
provides an upper boundary limit for the model. The next variable is the
expected floating velocity under the optimal air-to-solids ratio, as defined
under the operational input form. The hindered zone and free floating zone floating

parameters control the floating velocity defined in Equation 8.1. There will
likely be a fraction of solids, which can not be removed by flotation. This
fraction is characterized as the non-floatable fraction and an upper boundary for
this parameter as a concentration is set as the maximum non-floatable solids .
Figure 8-9 Flotation Parameters for the DAF Unit

Sand Filtration Models 245
CHAPTER 9
Sand Filtration Models
Introduction
This chapter describes the deep bed granular filtration models available in GPS-X. The
continuous and massbalance models are based on empirical removal efficiencies. The
simple1d model is a mechanistic model based on continuity and kinetic equations that
describe the removal of suspended particles by deep bed granular filters.
Continuous Model
The basis for the continuous model is the direct specification of the filter performance
through two parameters: the backwash flow fraction and the backwash solids mass fraction
(Figure 9-1). The backwashout connection (bottom left of object) is not used in this model.
The backwash flow fraction (frqbw) is the fraction of the incoming flow to the filter (input
connection - top left of object) that is used for backwash. Using this parameter, GPS-X
will calculate a continuous backwash flow (Qb) associated with the backwashout stream
(top right of the object):
Qb = Qi × frqbw
The continuous output flow (bottom right of the object), is then calculated from the
difference between the input flow and the backwash flow:
Qo = Qi − Qb
The backwash solids mass fraction (frxbw) is the fraction of incoming solids that is captured
by the filter, ending up in the backwash stream. Using this parameter, GPS-X calculates
the solids concentration in the backwashout stream (Xb):
Qi × X i × fwxbw
Xb =
Qb

246 Sand Filtration Models
The solids concentration in the output stream (Xo) is calculated from:
Qi × X i × (1 − frxbw)
X0 =
Qo
Figure 9-1 Operational Parameters Form – continuous Model
Mass Balance Model

The massbalance model is based on empirical removal efficiency for suspended solids,
BOD and TKN parameters. A `best' value is set for removal efficiency immediately after
backwash. The removal efficiency decreases during the filter cycle time as the filter is
fouled until the next backwash. The decrease in the removal efficiency is modelled with
an exponential function:
 bestefficiency  ( foulingcoeff x cycletime )

out = 1 −  × in × e
 100 
where:
out = filter effluent component concentration (mg/L)

in = filter influent component concentration (mg/L)
bestefficiency = best removal efficiency after backwash (%)
foulingcoeff = fouling coefficient
cycletime = time elapsed since last backwash (h)
A minimum efficiency value for suspended solids removal is also defined as an

operational parameter. This parameter does not affect removal computed by the model
but warns the user that, once removal of solids gets below this minimum value, the filter
is undergoing high headloss.
The massbalance model accounts for the mass accumulated in the filter during the filter
cycle time. The accumulated mass is removed during backwash. Therefore,

stoichiometric parameters for the filter effluent and the backwash may be specified. The
operational parameters for the massbalance model are shown in Figure 9-2.
Figure 9-2 Operational Parameters Form – massbalance Model
One-Dimensional Model
The basis for the simple1d model is the combination of the continuity (mass balance) and
the kinetic partial differential equations by Horner et al. (1986), which describe the
removal of suspended particles by a granular filter:
dσ  λ ⋅ C ⋅ u 
= 
dt  1 − ε d − C 
where:
σ = volume of deposited solids per unit bed volume
λ = filtration coefficient
C = concentration of suspended particles at depth L and time t
u = approach velocity (velocity of the fluid above the filter bed)
εd = porosity of deposited solids

248 Sand Filtration Models
t = time
When combined with defining equations for the deposited (attached) solids (X = σ⋅d) and
the unattached solids (X=C⋅δd) in the filter, the following equation is derived for the
simple1d model:
dX d λ ⋅ (1 − ε d ) ⋅ X ⋅ u
=
dt X 
1− εd −  
 δd 
where:
X = unattached solids
Xd = attached (deposited) solids
δd = density
The filter bed is divided into layers and it is assumed that the specific deposit is uniform
across each layer. During the backwash cycle, the average deposit through all layers of
the filter is used. The average deposit after backwash is used as the initial condition for
the subsequent filter run.
MODEL PARAMETERS
This section discusses the various model parameters and inputs that the user
encounters when using the simple1d model.
Physical
contain both real physical dimensions to describe the actual filter modelled,
and model dimensions which allow the user to specify the number of layers and
an effective particle diameter. The real dimensions of the filter are the bed
surface area and the bed depth.
Operational
Operational items, found under the Parameters sub-menu, include the basis for
the duration of the filtration run. The duration of the filtration run may be based
on a user-specified time, headloss or effluent suspended solids concentration.
The filtration run may also be set manually. Other operational parameters
include the influent flow and specification of the backwash parameters
(duration, rate).

Stoichiometric
The stoichiometric fractions available for the model are the ratios of particulate
COD to VSS, VSS to TSS and BOD5 to BODultimate.
Filter
The filtration constants required for the model are shown in Figure 9-3. The
filtration constants include the clean bed filtration coefficient (λo), the initial porosity
of the filter bed (εo) and the porosity of deposited solids (εd), the ultimate bulk specific
deposit (σu), and the density and dry material content of the solids . The packing
factor is used in the defining equation for the variation of the filtration
coefficient with the bulk specific deposit as given by Ojha and Graham (1992).
Figure 9-3 Filter Parameters
DISPLAY PARAMETERS
The flow and characteristics of the filter flow and backwash can be displayed
on output graphs. There are various filter variables available in the sub-menus
under Display Variables . The display variables include dilution , headloss and rates ,
the unattached and attached solids in the filter and filter conditions (i.e. bulk
deposit, bed porosity).

Digestion Models 251
CHAPTER 10
Digestion Models
This chapter describes the aerobic and anaerobic digestion models used in GPS-X.
Basic Anaerobic Digestion Model

This section describes the basic anaerobic digestion model associated with the anaerobic
digester object. It is a modified version of the model developed by Andrews (1969), and
Andrews et al. (1971). The modifications to the original model are:
• The addition of temperature sensitivity for the hydrolysis of volatile suspended

solids (VSS) and the growth of methanogenic organisms. The Arrhenius equation is
used with a base temperature of 35 degrees Celsius.
• The chemical equilibria were modified by introducing Hydromantis' pH model (See
pH Tool in Chapter 12).
• The introduction of particulate inert inorganic material (xii). This component
remains unchanged within the digester and is introduced for the sole purpose of
assessing its impact on other processes downstream of the digester.
• The addition of a rate for toxic substance degradation.
CONCEPTUAL MODEL
The basic anaerobic digestion model consists of two reactors: one for the liquid
phase and the other for the gaseous phase. Both are modelled as completely
mixed reactors. Transfer of gaseous products between the liquid phase and the
gaseous phase is modelled using a standard two-film mass transfer equation.
Gaseous carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) are assumed to follow the
ideal gas law. No further reactions take place in the gaseous phase, which has a
total gas pressure of 760 mm of Hg (i.e., atmospheric pressure).

252 Digestion Models
Figure 10-1 Schematic Diagram of the Anaerobic Digestion Model
A schematic diagram of the anaerobic digestion process is shown in Figure

10-1, where:
In the gas phase
qtg: total gas flow (m 3/d)

qco2: CO2 gas flow (m 3/d)
qch4: CH4 gas flow (m 3/d)
gco2: partial pressure of CO2 (atm)
gch4: partial pressure of CH4 (atm)
In the liquid phase
State Variables
xmh: methanogens (gCOD/m3)

vss: volatile suspended solids (gCOD/m 3)
slf: total volatile fatty acids (gCOD/m 3)
sco2t: total soluble CO2 (moles/L)
sz: net cations (moles/L)
stox: toxic substance (g/m3)

Composite Variables
snhn: free ammonia (moles/L)

snhi: ionized ammonium (moles/L)
slfn: non-ionized volatile fatty acids (moles/L)
slfi: ionized volatile fatty acids (moles/L)
pH: pH
hco3: bicarbonate (moles/L)
h2co3: carbonic acid (moles/L)
co2: carbonate (moles/L)
salk: alkalinity (g/m3)
MATHEMATICAL MODEL
The mathematical equations used in the liquid and gaseous phases are provided
in the corresponding Model matrix form in Appendix A. The general reaction
pathway is shown in Figure 10-2.
Figure 10-2 General Reaction Pathway
Stoichiometry
The relative amounts of chemical components produced by the biological and
chemical reactions in the anaerobic digester are specified by stoichiometric
coefficients. The chemical reaction stoichiometry is defined by the balanced
chemical reaction equations. The biological stoichiometry is defined by the
yield coefficients.
Seven yield coefficients are used by the basic model:

ya = slf / vss
yb = sco2t / vss
yc = xmh / slf
yd = sco2t / xmh
ye = gch4 / xmh
yf = snhi / vss
yg = xmh / snhi
In each case the yield is defined as the ratio of the change in a product to the
change in a reactant. Volatile acids and volatile suspended solids are expressed
as their equivalent chemical oxygen demand (COD).
Components and Processes in the Mathematical Model

Volatile Suspended Solids
The rate of hydrolysis of VSS is assumed to be first order with respect to the
concentration of VSS. A temperature correction factor (ftkco) is calculated
using the Arrhenius equation with a base temperature of 35 degrees Celsius.
The temperature correction factor is incorporated in the equation for the
hydrolysis rate:
r1 = kco ⋅ vss ⋅ ftkco
where kco is the rate constant for the hydrolysis of VSS.
Methanogenic Organisms
The growth of the microorganisms responsible for the generation of methane is

modelled using the Monod equation modified by switching functions (similar
to the IWA models). The rate of growth of methane producing bacteria (r2) is
assumed to be proportional to their concentration (mumh). The model uses
un-ionized volatile acids (slfn) as the substrate and incorporates two switching
functions for inhibition: one for inhibition by slfn and the other by free
ammonia (snh). The resulting rate equation is:
xmh ⋅ mumh
r2 = ⋅ ftmumh
 ks slfn snh 
1 + + + 
 slfn kia kin 
where ftmum is the temperature correction factor for the growth of

methanogens, mumh is the maximum specific growth rate for methanogens, ks
is the half-saturation coefficient, and kia and kin are the inhibition constants for
slfn and snh, respectively. As in other biological models, the rate of decay of

methane producing bacteria (r3) is assumed to be proportional to their

concentration:
r 3 = − kd ⋅ xmh
where kd is the decay rate coefficient. The effect of toxic substances (stox,
input as a special component to the influent parameters) is taken into account
by using a first order expression for the rate of inactivation of methane
bacteria:
r 4 = −ktox ⋅ stox
where ktox is the inactivation rate coefficient. Based on the above rates, the net
rate of generation of methanogens (rxmh) is:
rxmh = r 2 − r 3 − r 4
Toxic Substances
A rate of toxic substance degradation (r5) is incorporated in the basic model.

The rate of degradation is assumed to be first order with respect to the
concentration of toxic substances:
r 5 = kb ⋅ stox
where kb is the toxic substance degradation rate.
Total Volatile Fatty Acids
The kinetic expression for total volatile fatty acids (slf) can be established
using the previously presented kinetic expressions and appropriate yield
coefficients:
d (slf )
= rslf = ( ya ⋅ r1) −
r2
dt yc
where (ya ⋅ r1) is the rate of generation of slf by hydrolysis, and –r2 / yc is the
rate of utilization of slf by the growth of methanogens.
Methane
The biological generation of methane can be expressed in terms of bacterial

growth rates and yield coefficients. The model assumes that the solubility of
methane is negligible and all methane generated is immediately transferred to
the gas phase:

d (ch4 )
= qch4 = vm ⋅ r 2 ⋅ ye
dt
where vm is the volume of the liquid phase in the digester.
Carbon Dioxide
The mass transfer of carbon dioxide between the liquid and gas phases is
calculated using the standard two-film gas transfer equation.
r 6 = klaco2 ⋅ (co2 sat − h2co3)
where KLaco2 is the mass transfer coefficient for CO2, co2sat is the saturation
concentration of CO2 in the liquid phase, and. H2co3=sco2t-hco3-co2.
The pH model within the basic digester model calculates bicarbonate (hco3)
and carbonate (co2). The concentration of dissolved CO2 in the liquid phase at
equilibrium (co2sat) is calculated using Henry's law:
co2 sat = henryco2 ⋅ gco2
where henryco2 is Henry's law constant for CO2 , and gco2 is the partial
pressure of CO2 in the gas phase. Combining the above equations:
r 6 = klaco2 ⋅ (henryco2 ⋅ gco2 − sco2 )
The rate of biological generation of total soluble carbon dioxide (rsco2t) can be
expressed in terms of bacterial growth rates and yield coefficients. Combined
with the above equation results in the total reaction rate for dissolved CO2
(rsco2):
rsco 2t =
( yb ⋅ r1) + ( yd ⋅ r 2) + r 6
gvol
1000
where (yb ⋅ r1) is the rate of generation of sco2t by the hydrolysis of vss, (yd ⋅
r2) is the rate of generation of sco2t by the growth of methanogens, and gvol is
the gas constant for CO2 in L/mole. The mass transfer of CO2 between the
liquid and gas phases (r6) is negative when CO2 is transferred from the liquid
to the gas phase.

Ammonia
Ammonia (snh) is assumed to be produced only at the hydrolysis/acidification

stage. Ammonia (snh) is utilized by the methanogenic organisms for growth.
The rate of generation of free ammonia (rsnh) is modelled as:
rsnh = ( yf ⋅ r1) −
r2
yg
where (yf ⋅ r1) is the rate of generation of ammonia by hydrolysis/acidification,

and -r2/yg is the rate of consumption of ammonia due to the growth of
methanogenic organisms.
The chemical equilibria and the pH calculation used for ammonia (snh) and
ammonium ion (snhi) are based on Hydromantis' pH Model and is explained in
Chapter 11.
Model Parameters
that the user would encounter when using this model. The Parameters menu is
Figure 10-3 Parameters Menu for the Anaerobic Digester

Physical and Operational Parameters
Operational .
The Physical parameters are the volume of the liquid phase or maximum volume
(vm), the volume of the gas phase (vg), the total pressure of dry gas @35C (ptg), and
the digester temperature (temp) (Figure 10-4).
Figure 10-4 Physical Parameters

The Operational parameters shown in Figure 10-5 are exclusively related to the
control of the pumped flow. These parameters are similar to the control
parameters used in other models (e.g., CSTR reactor).
Influent and Effluent Parameters
These menu items are found under Parameters sub-menu items Influent and
Effluent .
The Influent sub-menu, shown in Figure 10-6, allows the user to define influent
parameters that are exclusive to the basic digester model: soluble total CO2
(sco2t), toxic substance concentration (stox), methanogens concentration (xmh) and
net cations (strong bases) (sz).
The Effluent sub-menu, shown in Figure 10-7, allows the user to define special
components to the effluent of the anaerobic digester: inert soluble COD (si) and
the fraction of the effluent VSS that is inert (frinert).

Figure 10-5 Operational Parameters
Figure 10-6 Influent Parameters
Figure 10-7 Effluent Parameters
pH Solver Set up Parameters
These parameters, found under the Parameters sub-menu item pH Solver Set up
(Figure 10-8) define the initial pH value (ph), the pH boundaries: minimum
(lowph), and maximum (highph) values, and the required pH accuracy (errorph).
Parameters for the search routine of the pH, described in Chapter 10, are
presented in this sub-menu.

Figure 10-8 pH Solver Set up
Kinetic and Stoichiometric Parameters
The kinetic parameters (shown in Figure 10-9) are found under Parameters sub-
menu item kinetic . The maximum specific growth rate for methanogens (mumh) and
the rate constant for hydrolysis of vss (kco) are defined for 35 degrees Celsius and
corrected by the model using the Arrhenius equation with the temperature
coefficients indicated at the bottom of this menu (tmumh & tkco). The rest of
the kinetic parameters in the basic model are not temperature-dependent.
Figure 10-9 Kinetic Parameters

The stoichiometric parameters (Figure 10-10) are found under Parameters sub-
menu item Stoichiometric . The first set of stoichiometric parameters consists of
conversion factors: particulate COD (xcod) to vss ratio (icvcon), BOD5 (bod) to
BOD ultimate (bodu) ratio (fbodcon).
Conversion factors that are unique to the digester basic model are the mass
acetic acid to COD factor (ac2cod), the molecular weight of fatty acids (mwfat) and
the gas constant (gvol).
Using these factors and the parameters defined in the Effluent sub-menu, the
basic digester model establishes the values for the composite parameters.
These parameters will modify the stoichiometry of the effluent stream.
The second set of stoichiometric parameters consists of yields. The relative

amounts of chemical components produced by the biological reactions in the
anaerobic digester are specified by these yields. These yields are explained in
the section Stoichiometry.
Other stoichiometric parameters in this sub-menu are the dissociation constants

used to calculate the ionized components in the pH model incorporated in the
basic model. The dissociation constant for ammonium (kncon) is defined for
20 degrees Celsius and is temperature sensitive, i.e., the model corrects it for
temperature changes using the following equation:
( ) (
kn = kncon − 0.336 × 10 −5 + 2.134 × 10 −7 ⋅ temp − 2.242 × 10 −9 ⋅ temp 2 )
The rest of the dissociation constants are not corrected for temperature changes
in the basic model.
Gas transfer parameters are also defined on this form. The mass transfer
coefficient for carbon dioxide gas (sco2) between the liquid and gas phases
(KLaco2) is not corrected by temperature in the basic model. Henry's law
constant for carbon dioxide (henryco2) is also included in this item and is not
corrected for temperature.

Figure 10-10 Stoichiometric Parameters
Anaerobic Digestion Model #1 (ADM1)

Anaerobic Digestion Model #1 (ADM1) (Batstone et al., 2002) is implemented in GPS-X
according to the ADM1 COST Benchmark (Rosen and Jeppsson, 2002), with the
following changes:
• Several differential equations that describe the acid-base equilibrium of the

system (equations for Sva-, Sbu-, Spro-, Sac-, Shco3-, and Snh3) have been converted to
algebraic equations as described in Table B.3 of Batstone et al. (2002). These
processes are very fast and contribute to the stiffness of the system of differential
equations.
• The differential equation for Sh2 has been converted to an algebraic equation to
improve the simulation speed. This process is very fast and contributes to the
stiffness of the system of differential equations. This approach is described by
Rosen et al. (2005).

These changes substantially increase the solution speed of ADM1 in GPS-X and allow an
integration algorithm other than Gear’s Stiff to be used. Double Precision arithmetic
should be used when solving ADM1 in GPS-X (accessed in Options > Preferences > Build
tab)
The structured model includes five process steps including disintegration, hydrolysis,
acidogenesis, acetogenesis and methanogenesis. The model uses 32 dynamic state
variables, 6 acid-base kinetic processes, 19 biochemical processes, and 3 gas-liquid
transfer processes.
A simplified ADM1 material flow diagram is shown in Figure 10-11. For a full
description of the model, the reader is referred to Batstone et al. (2002). Implementation
details are found in Rosen and Jeppsson (2002).
Composite Material Inert Material
Carbohydrate Proteins Lipids
Monosaccharides Amino Acids Long-chain FA
Short-chain FA
Hydrogen
Methane
Acetate
Figure 10-11 Simplified ADM1 Material Flow Diagram
In GPS-X, the ADM1 model makes use of an ASM1 to ADM1 interface developed by
Copp et al. (2003). This interface allows ADM1 to be used within a full-plant layout that
uses ASM1 to model activated sludge processes.
When using ADM1 there are two possible scenarios:
• The influent stream is represented by an influent object. This case is more difficult
and requires that you specify the influent in the influent object and in the Influent

Form in the digester object. See Figure 10-12 for a graphical description of this
procedure. The section entilted “ADM1 MODEL SETUP SUGGESTIONS” gives
suggestions on how to characterize the influent.
The influent stream is an output stream from another object. This case is
simpler as the object that precedes the digester will take care of the
characterization of the stream itself. The user still needs to specify the
parameters found in the Influent form of the digester object. See
• Figure 10-13 for a graphical description of this procedure. The section entilted
“ADM1 MODEL SETUP SUGGESTIONS” gives suggestions on how to characterize
the influent.
Figure 10-12 Method of Specifying the ADM1 Influent When the

Influent Stream is Represented by an Influent Object

Figure 10-13 Method of Specifying the ADM1 Influent When the

Influent Stream is an Output Stream from Another Object
ADM1 MODEL SETUP SUGGESTIONS

The following hints are useful for characterizing influent streams to a digester object
using the ADM1 model. Because the ADM1 model uses a different set of state variables
than the ASM activated sludge models, supplementary information has to be supplied for
the ASM1/ADM1 interface.
In typical simulation practice, you will not have all the information you need, and will
have to estimate the values for many of the ADM1 influent parameters. These guidelines
can be useful for making sure that the estimates are used correctly. The following
suggestions are for the Carbon-Nitrogen Library (CNLIB).
ADM1 State Variables Set on the ADM1 “Influent” Parameter Menu

Parameter Suggestion
cations Must be measured or estimated or can be set to the value
of the Sic (inorganic carbon) state in ADM1.
anions Must be measured or estimated or can be set to the value

of the Sin (inorganic nitrogen) state in ADM1.
long chain fatty acids Must be measured or estimated. It is part of Ss in the
influent object form.
total valerate Must be measured or estimated. It is part of Ss in the
total butyrate Must be measured or estimated. It is part of Ss in the
total propionate Must be measured or estimated. It is part of Ss in the
total acetate Must be measured or estimated. It is part of Ss in the
hydrogen gas Set to zero
methane gas Set to zero
proteins Must be measured or estimated. It is part of Xs in the
sugar degraders Set to zero
amino acid degraders Set to zero
long chain fatty acid Set to zero
degraders
valerate and butyrate Set to zero
degraders
propionate degraders Set to zero
acetate degraders Set to zero
hydrogen degraders Set to zero
ADM1 STATE VARIABLES SET IN THE INFLUENT OBJECT

When the influent stream is represented by an influent object, the states influent model
should be used in the influent object. Some of the states are ADM1 states and these need
to be estimated. Some states are not relevent for ADM1 and can be ignored. Some states
form a fraction of an ADM1 state and when added up need to correspond to the values
entered into the influent form of the ADM1 object. More detailed descriptions are given
below:
inert inorganic suspended Must be measured or estimated. It is not an ADM1 state
solids but will impact the solids concentration.
soluble inert organic Same as the Si state in ADM1

material
readily biodegradable Sum of Monosaccharides, Amino acids, Long chain fatty

substrate acids, Total valerate, Total butyrate, Total propionate,

Total acetate, and Carbohydrates states in ADM1. Make
sure this value is the sum of the values entered for these
states in the ADM1 influent stream.
particulate inert organic Same as Xi state in ADM1.
material
slowly biodegradable Sum of composites, proteins, and lipids states in ADM1.

substrate Make sure this value is the sum of the values entered for
these states in the ADM1 influent stream.
active heterotrophic Set to zero unless you have an estimate of it.
biomass
active autotrophic biomass Set to zero unless you have an estimate of it.
unbiodegradable Becomes part of Xi state in ADM1. Unless you know Xu,
particulates from cell use Xi above and set this to zero
decay
internal cell storage Not used.
product
dissolved oxygen Not in ADM1 but used by GPS-X to estimate the COD
demand of the influent stream. It is assumed that both
oxygen and nitrate will be reduced instantaneously upon
entering the anaerobic environment, so the total incoming
COD is reduced by this incoming COD demand to
compensate for the reduction of the electron acceptors
present in the incoming stream.
free and ionized ammonia Sin state in ADM1 (inorganic nitrogen). Make sure that
correct units are used.
soluble biodegradable (nitrogen faction in amino acids = 0.098) × amino acids

organic nitrogen concentration
particulate biodegradable Use the following formulas:
organic nitrogen
Xnd = total TKN - Snd - Snh - inxu*Xu -inxi*Xi
total TKN = Sin + Ni × Si + Ni × (Xi+Xu) + Naa × Saa + Nxc ×

Xc
where:
Snd = conc. of soluble biodegradable organic nitrogen

Snh = conc. of free and ionized ammonia
inxu = nitrogen fraction of unbiodegradable particulates
from cell decay (0.068 in Mantis, 0.06 in ASM1)
inxi = nitrogen fraction of particulate inerts (0.068 in

Mantis, 0.06 in ASM1)
Xu = conc. of unbiodegradable particulates from cell decay
Ni = nitrogen fraction of Si and Xi
Si = conc. of soluble inerts
Xi = conc. of particulate inerts
Naa = nitrogen fraction of amino acids (0.098)
Saa = conc. of amino acids
Nxc = nitrogen fraction of composites (0.0376)
Xc = conc. of composites
nitrate and nitrite Not in ADM1 but used by GPS-X to estimate the COD
demand of the influent stream. It is assumed that both
oxygen and nitrate will be reduced instantaneously upon
entering the anaerobic environment, so the total incoming
COD is reduced by this incoming COD demand to
compensate for the reduction of the electron acceptors
present in the incoming stream.
dinitrogen Set to zero.
alkalinity Sic state in ADM1 (inorganic carbon).
Aerobic Digestion Model

The objective of the aerobic digestion process is to stabilize and reduce the mass of solids
for disposal. In this process, microorganisms consume their own protoplasm for energy;
they are assumed to be in the endogenous phase. This phase is accounted for in the
biological models associated with the CSTR object, but in aerobic digestion, destruction
of particulate inert organic material also occurs.
The models associated with the aerobic digester are given the name <model>dig , where
<model> is the associated activated sludge model (such as asm1, etc.). The only
difference between the activated sludge model and its corresponding aerobic digester
model is an added first-order reaction. This additional reaction adjusts the particulate
inert organic concentration to account for the destruction of the inert organics:
rxi = −ki * xi
where rxi is the rate of reaction for particulate inert organics (xi), and ki is the inert organics
bioconversion rate. The latter can be found under the Parameters - Kinetic menu of the
aerobic digester object.
No loss of COD is involved in this process, and no electron acceptor is utilized. This
destruction process converts particulate inert organics (xi) to slowly biodegradable
substrate (xs). The slowly biodegradable substrate formed is then hydrolyzed, releasing
an equivalent amount of readily biodegradable COD.

UASB/EGSB model
The UASB/EGSB model is available only in MANTIS2LIB. The Mantis2 model is used
to model the biological-chemical reactions in the reactor. Some of the assumptions made
in the development of model are listed below.
1) The hydraulic regime in the UASB/EGSB is modeled as completely mixed

reactor.
2) The substrate diffusion into the granule is assumed to be not limiting and the
reactions are modeled similar to the suspended growth systems.
3) The average granule properties are used to estimate the granule settling
velocity and bed expansion in the reactor.
4) A semi-empirical model is used to estimate the solid concentration

distribution above the bed.
The simplified model structure is a first attempt to dynamically model the UASB//EGSB
reactors for practical engineering problems.
Some of the important inputs and outputs of the model are described in following
sections.
Reactor Parameters
Additional set of input parameters are required for the UASB/EGSB model to
estimate the granule settling velocity, bed fluidization and solid distribution
profile above the sludge bed.
The Reactor Parameters can be accessed from the Input Parameters menu item
(Figure 10-14). The Reactor Parameters form is as shown in Figure 10-15.
Figure 10-14 Reactor parameters for UASB/EGSB reactor

Figure 10-15 Reactor Parameters Input form
A brief explanation of some of the input parameters is provided.
Fraction of un-reacted flow-through solids – It is well known that

UASB/EGSB reactors are not very effective in treating the suspended solids in
the wastewater. A fraction of the solids in the influent stream may just flow
through the UASB/EGSB reactor without getting adsorbed or reacted in the
reactor. This parameter allows users to specify the fraction of solids which will
pass through the reactors un-reacted. Although, this phenomenon is normally
observed, it is not very well quantified. The default value of this parameter is
set at 0.5. In actual situation, depending on the bed expansion, the value of this
parameter may vary.
Average granule size – This parameter is used to calculate the settling velocity
of the granules in the granular bed. The estimated settling velocity is also used
in estimating the bed expansion in the reactor. A default value of 2mm is used.
Terminal velocity reduction factor – The observed settling velocity of the

biological granules is found to be less than the settling velocity estimation
procedures. Normally a reduction factor of 0.7-0.8 is suggested in the literature.
Water content in granule– This parameter defines the water content in a

granule and is used to estimate the density of the granule required in the
settling velocity estimation procedure.

Void ratio of stationary granular bed – This parameter defines the void volume
in the granular bed under no flow conditions.
Depth of transition zone – The UASB/EGSB model uses a semi-empirical

model to decide the solid profile above the expanded granule bed. In the
present model it is assumed that there exists a transition zone above the sludge
bed in which the solid concentration changes from the concentration in the bed
to a fraction of concentration at the end of transition zone. The depth of this
transition zone will affect the solid profile and solid capture efficiency in the
reactor.
Ratio of SS in transition zone to sludge bed – As described above, this

parameter represents the ratio of solid concentration at the transition zone
boundary to the solid concentration in the granule bed.
Fraction of non-settleable solids – This parameter signifies the fraction of finer

particles in the bed which are non-settleable. This ratio is expressed with
respect to the solid concentration in the reactor.
Solid recovery efficiency of gas solid separator – The solid distribution curve
above the granule bed is used to estimate the solids concentration reaching the
gas solid separator at the top UASB/EGSB reactors. Depending on the
efficiency of the gas solid separator the concentration of solids escaping in
effluent is estimated.

Other Models 273
CHAPTER 11
Other Models
Splitters
The proportional splitters in GPS-X can be set up for constant flow split, variable split
based on a timer, or variable split based on flow. In the Parameters > Splitter Set up form
you can select the appropriate splitting mode. They are described below.
Constant - When using this splitting mode, the split fractions do not change (as entered
under the Constant section), or are read from a file, or are controlled by any other method
(controller tool or customization).
Timer based - When using this splitting mode, the split fractions, as entered under the
Constant section, will be rotated through the connection points according to the specified
time interval.
Flow based - When using this splitting mode, the split fractions, as entered under the
Constant section, will be rotated through the connection points according to the specified
volume. Once the specified volume has passed through the splitter input, the fractions
will be moved to the next output connection.
A typical example of using this functionality is a multiple train SBR plant, where the
influent has to be sent to a different SBR tank either by timer control or by discharged
volume.
Control Splitter
A control splitter can be used to split flow into a set flow rate and an overflow. This
object is useful for setting flow bypass controls.
The pumped flow rate is set in the Parameters > Pumped Flow menu. If the incoming flow is
equal to or less than the pumped flow rate, all of the flow will exit through the pump
connection point. If the incoming flow is greater than the pumped flow rate, the excess
flow will exit through the overflow connection point.
An automatic PID controller can be used in this object to control another variable in GPS-
X with the pumped flow rate.

274 Other Models
Pumping Station
The noreact model for Pumping Station is modified for the fixed water level option.
In the fixed water level option, the pumping flow rate used to be equal to the input flow
rate. One of the issues with the model was that in a flow scheme with pump recycle, the
pumped flows gets unbounded.
In the variable water level option, the main problem was the undefined flow rates for the
steady state calculations.
Both of these problems are addressed in the new model. In the new model, the fixed level
option is made equivalent to the continuous pumping while the variable water level
option is considered equivalent to intermittent pumping with water level control.
MODEL DATA INPUT
The new input form is as shown in Figure 11-1.
Figure 11-1 Pumping Station Menu
Continuous pumping – this variable controls whether continuous pumping or intermittent

water level controlled pumping is used.
Average daily pump flow rate – this flow rate is used for continuous pumping rate and
also in the calculation of steady state calculations when intermittent pumping is selected.
Low volume for pump OFF – this variable defines the volume in the tank below which
the pump operates at minimum pumping capacity.
High volume for pump ON – this variable defines the volume in the tank above which the
pump operates at maximum pumping capacity.

Other Models 275
Minimum pump capacity – this is the capacity at which the pump operates when the
volume in the tank is below the low volume.
Maximum pump capacity – this is the capacity at which the pump operates when the
volume in the tank is above the high volume.
Membrane Filter
One model is available for this object (empiric ).
In this zero-volume model, the soluble state variables are not affected, but solids are
partitioned into one of two streams based on a user-defined solids separation factor. Flow
can be pumped from either of the effluent connection pipes and the difference between
the pumped flow and influent flow is diverted to the other effluent connection. Solids
concentrations in the two effluent streams are calculated through a mass balance based on
flows and the separation factor. An example calculation is given below:
Influent Flow = 100 m3/d

Influent xbh = 1000 g/m3
Mass Influent xbh = 100 x 1000 = 100,000 g/d
Pumped Flow (user-defined) = 10 m3/d - concentrate

Filter Efficiency (user-defined) = 0.90
Filtrate Flow = 90 m3/d

Filtrate xbh Concentration = 100 g/m3
Filtrate xbh Mass = 90 x 100 = 9,000 g/d
Concentrate xbh Mass = 100,000 - 9,000 = 91,000 g/d

Concentrate xbh Concentration = 91,000 / 10 = 9,100 g/m3
Equalization Tank
In the nonreactive noreact model, the effect of dilution on wastewater components is
described, but all reaction rates are set to zero (no biological reactions are occurring). The
tank has aeration terms (for modelling of pre-aeration) and a built-in pump, and both
aeration and pumped flow can be controlled with feedback controllers (P, PI, PID)
analogous to the ones found in aeration tanks and settler/clarifier objects.
This model can be used to simulate an equalization tank either off-line or in-line, as the
volume is variable. In an off-line or variable volume mode (flow equalization), the pump
connection should be used with the proper controller set up, while for concentration
equalization in fixed volume tanks the overflow connection is best used.
Reactions can be added by double-selecting the model (noreact ) and editing the rate
equations of the individual components.

276 Other Models
Sludge PreTreatment
In a sludge pretreatment process, the particulate organic compounds are converted into
soluble organic compounds. The degree of solubilization normally depends on the
intensity of the treatment. There are many different types of sludge pretreatment
processes. These processes can mainly be divided into thermal, mechanical and chemical
treatment. Thermal, mechanical disintegration, ultrasound, microwave, alkaline treatment
ozonation, Fenton etc. are some of the treatment which have been normally applied. For
thermal and mechanical treatments, the main operational parameter affecting the degree
of solubilization is the specific energy input, while for chemical treatment it is the
specific chemical dose. The specific energy input and specific chemical dose are
normally expressed in terms of per unit of solids. As the mechanisms in sludge
pretreatment processes are normally too complex to describe through a mechanistic
model, empirical approach of modeling is normally adopted. For general engineering
purpose, this approach is sufficient to evaluate different options and help in decision
making.
The general sludge pretreatment process model in GPS-X includes the following
transformations.
1. The model describes the relationship between degree of solubilization to the

operational parameters like specific energy input or specific chemical dose using a
solubilization saturation curve.
2. The model allows conversion of the non-biodegradable organics into biodegradable
organics.
3. The model allows for loss of during the treatment
The sludge pretreatment model is available in MANTIS2LIB. Three main

transformations are described in the model.
1. Inactivation of bacterial biomass
The sludge pretreatment normally results in bacterial inactivation. The bacterial

inactivation may happen due to disintegration of the cell wall and release of soluble
organic products. The biological inactivation will results in production of soluble and
particulate organic products. Depending on the nature of treatment as part of the COD
may be lost due to oxidation.
2. Conversion of Inert Organics (Xi and Xu)
The inert particulate COD is reduced during the sludge pretreatment. A part of the
particulate inert COD is assumed to convert to the slowly biodegradable COD. The
particulate inert COD also solubilize and results in soluble biodegradable and soluble
inert COD. Depending on the treatment a part of the inert organic COD may be lost.

Other Models 277
3. Conversion of slowly biodegradable COD (Xs)
The particulate slowly and very slowly biodegradable COD is solubilized and results in
the soluble biodegradable substrate.
The implemented model is an input-output model in which all the input states are
instantaneously converted to the output states. It is assumed that the retention time in the
chemical-mechanical disintegration reactors are small.
In-line Chemical Dosage
IN-LINE CHEMICAL DOSAGE OBJECT

In-line Chemical Dosage object (shown at left) can be used to simulate
chemical addition for soluble phosphorus removal and coagulation/flocculation
of soluble and colloidal componenets. Two chemical precipitation models
chemeq and metaladd are available in GPS-X. The metaladd model is available in
all the libraries having soluble phosphorus as a state variable. The chemeq
model is not available in MANTIS2LIB. The metaladd model considers the
effect of pH and solubility product in the metal precipitation recations.
CHEMEQ PRECIPITATION MODEL

The P-removal model is available only in the CNP library. The model is based
on the stoichiometry of the chemical precipitation of soluble phosphorus. The
model is set up to simulate the addition of one of four possible chemicals: 1)
alum; 2) ferric compounds; 3) ferrous compounds; and 4) other user defined
metal compounds. In each case, the dosage is expressed in terms of mass of
metal ion. For example, for dosing alum, the dosage is expressed in terms of
mass of aluminum ion.
As an example, the basic reaction of phosphorus with aluminum is shown in

Equation 11.1.
3−
A1+3 + PO4 <=> A1PO4 (11.1)
Therefore, one mole of aluminum ion reacts with one mole of phosphate or, on
a mass basis; one gram of aluminum ion (Al3+) reacts with 1.148 grams of
phosphorus (P). The dosage that is required is the mass of aluminum ion that is
added rather than the mass of alum, which may be in different forms (hydrated,
etc.). This method of calculating the stoichiometric requirements for alum and
the other chemicals avoids the issue of different compounds and their
molecular weights. The phosphorus stoichiometric coefficients for alum and

278 Other Models
the other chemicals are already defined, but could be modified for modelling
another chemical that is not predefined.
Although the stoichiometric ratios are used as the basis of the precipitation
model, the complexities of wastewater chemistry, including the effects of pH,
alkalinity and other elements, means that the stoichiometric ratio is only the
maximum achievable phosphorus removal in presence of a large overdose of
chemical. In practice, a significantly lower removal is achieved because all the
chemical added is not available for phosphorus addition. However, the
available fraction, and therefore the required dosage, must be estimated or
calibrated from site to site and specified in the model.
With a large overdose of metal ion to wastewater, most of the phosphorus

would be removed; however, there would still be trace amounts of phosphorus.
To model this phenomenon, a saturation function was incorporated in the
model. The amount of phosphorus removed (or soluble organic component, si
and ss, that would flocculate) becomes a function of the phosphorus
concentration (or soluble organic component concentration). The
stoichiometric amount of removal is only achieved when the phosphorus
concentration is large (with respect to the half-saturation coefficient). Removal
is less than the maximum stoichiometric amount when the phosphorus
concentration is small (with respect to the half-saturation coefficient). This
phenomenon is depicted in Figure 11-2.
P removal
max removal
half of max
removal
half saturation
P concentration
Figure 11-2 Removal as a Function of P Concentration
The mass of chemical precipitant formed is also calculated and added to the
particulate inert inorganic component (xii). The stoichiometric amount of
chemical sludge produced is based on the stoichiometry of the basic reaction.
For example, in Equation 11.1, the mass of chemical precipitant (AlPO4) is
4.52 g per 1g of aluminum ion reacted.
The model provides the user with two dosage methods: mass flow based and flow
proportional . The former requires the user to specify a continuous flow rate for

Other Models 279
the chemical, while the latter allows the user to specify a flow rate of chemical
per unit flow of liquid entering the basin. The dosage rate can be set up as a
manipulated variable to maintain the phosphorus at a specified setpoint at any
location downstream of the chemical addition.
In addition to precipitating the phosphorus, the chemicals flocculate some of

the colloidal organics into particulate matter. In the model this is simulated as a
conversion of soluble inert COD and soluble substrate into particulate inerts
and particulate substrate. The extent of flocculation will depend on the half-
saturation constants for each species. These constants need calibration from
plant to plant as the flocculation model is empirical.
Here is a detailed explanation of the constants of the Chemical Dosage menu

item:
number of chemicals .Currently four chemicals (alum, ferrous and ferric, plus a
user defined) are available.
dosage mode . mass flow based - in mass/time units.
flow proportional - in mass/volume units.
The following stoichiometry parameters (for all compounds) are found under
the More… button, and are described in Table 11-1.
Table 11-1 Chemeq Parameters

Parameter Description
gP/gMe precipitated stoichiometrically (if metal
P precipitation stoichiometry
is in excess)
soluble inert COD flocculation gCOD/gMe soluble inert COD converted to
stoichiometry particulate inert COD (si to xi)
soluble substrate flocculation gCOD/gMe soluble substrate converted to
stoichiometry particulate substrate (ss to xs)
metal hydroxide stoichiometry g of MeOH formed per g of metal added
gP/m3 concentration at which half the Metal
P precipitation half-saturation
coefficient
available for this reaction will be used to
precipitate phosphorus
gCOD/m3 concentration at which half the metal
soluble inert flocculation half-
saturation coefficient
flocculate soluble inerts
gCOD/m3 concentration at which half the metal
soluble substrate flocculation half-
saturation coefficient
flocculate soluble substrate

280 Other Models
The stoichiometry for inorganic inert solids production from P precipitation

that was available as a parameter in previous versions of this model (under the
name chemdos ) is now calculated from known stoichiometry.
In addition, the chemeq model is written as an equilibrium model, meaning that

all precipitation and flocculation is assumed to happen instantaneously, and
goes to completion within the flow-through of the In-Line Chemical Dosage
object.
All nitrogen and phosphorus fractions of COD components are recalculated for
mass balance after the precipitation has taken place.
DOSAGE CONTROLLER
The chemeq model contains a P-removal dosage controller, which is available
in the Input Parameters > Chemical Dosage menu (see Figure 11-3 Dosage
Controller Parameters).
Figure 11-3 Dosage Controller Parameters
The controller allows users to specify a desired effluent P concentration, and

back-calculates the required metal ion dosage, based on the stoichiometry
settings.
METALADD PRECIPITATION/COAGULATION MODEL
The metaladd model is a semi-mechanistic model to assess the removal of

soluble phosphorus due to metal addition. Following key assumptions are made
in the model development.

Other Models 281
1. The metal species exists in the form of Me(OH)3. All the other soluble and
insoluble species of metal are not modeled. Thus the model results outside the
pH range of 6-8 may not be applicable.
2. Solubility product of the metal phosphates is used in estimating the

amount of expected precipitates.
3. The solubility product is based on the PO43- ion which is estimated based
on the solution pH and dissociation coefficient of H3PO4.
4. The removal mechanism is assumed to be instantaneous, therefore no

volume of the reactor is considered.
Following mass balance equations may be written for different phosphorus

components across the In-Line Chemical Dosing object.
1. Mass balance equation for Me(OH)3 concentration.
X me ( oh ) 3, o = X me ( oh ) 3,in + a.Pme − b. X mepo 4, formed
2. Mass Balance equation for soluble phosphorus concentration.
S p , o = S p ,in − c. X mepo 4, formed
3. Mass balance equation for MePO4 concentration.
X mepo 4, o = X mepo 4,in + X mepo 4, formed
The equation describing the relationship among the metal ion, phosphate ion
and the solubility product is as below.
X me ( oh )3, o
.S p , o .α = kSP
a
Xme(oh)3,o = metal hydroxide concentration at outlet, gMe/m3
Xme(oh)3,in = metal hydroxide concentration at inlet, gMe /m3
Pme = metal dose, gMe /m3
a= stoichiometry conversion factor, gMe(OH)3 /g Me
Xmepo4,formed = concentration of formed precipitate, g MePO4/m3

282 Other Models
b = stoichiometry conversion factor, gMe(OH)3/ g MePO4
c = stoichiometry conversion factor, g P/g MePO4
α = dissociation factor for estimating PO43- from total orthophosphate

concentration, -
The set of above equations are solved simultaneously to calculate the soluble
phosphorus removal in the in-line chemical dosing object. The main calibration
parameter in the model is the solubility product of the metal phosphates. The
default values are provided based on the evaluation of reported values in
literature. The values however may need to be adjusted to account for the
differences in wastewater characteristics, mixing regimes and other parameters
which affect the P-precipitation process.
In addition to P-precipitation, the metaladd model also models the removal of

colloidal COD (scol), soluble inert COD (si) and soluble organic nitrogen (snd)
through flocculation. Following assumptions are used in the formulation of this
empirical flocculation model.
1. The metal dose to flocculate unit soluble component is a function of the soluble
component concentration.
2. The metal dose required per unit soluble component removed is expressed as
an exponential function with minimum bound.
The equation for metal dose per unit SS removed can be expressed as below.
F = Fmax .e − k a C + Fmin
F = Fmax . �e−S.ka � + Fmin F = metal consumed per unit soluble component at

soluble component concentration C, g Me/g component
C= Concentration of soluble component, g/m3
Fmax = maximum metal consumption per unit soluble component, g Me/g

component
Fmin = minimum metal consumption per unit soluble component, g Me/g

component
ka = affinity factor, m3/g
The shape of the curve represented by the above equation is as shown in Figure
11-4.

Other Models 283
25
20
15
gMe/gSS
10
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
SS concentration (mg/l)
Figure 11-4 Curve showing relationship between the soluble components

concentration and required metal dose for unit soluble component
removal
The integration of curve in Figure 11-4 between the limits of Sin (concentration
of soluble component in influent) and So (concentration of soluble component
in effluent) results in the following expression. For a given metal dose and inlet
concentration, the equation is solved to estimate the So, concentration of
soluble component in effluent.
Pme = [
Fmax − k a S o
ka
.e ]
− e − k a S in + Fmin .(Sin − So )
Fmax
Pme,c = . �e−So ka − e−Sin ka � + Fmin (Sin − So )Pme = metal dose, gMe/m3
ka
Sin= concentration of soluble component in influent, g/m3
So= concentration of soluble component in effluent, g/m3
There are three parameters Fmax, Fmin and ka used in the model. The parameter
Fmax may be interpreted as the amount of metal required to remove the said
component at very low concentrations. It is general observation that the amount
of metal required at lower concentration of soluble component is much higher
than the metal amount required when the concentration of soluble component is
higher. The parameter of Fmin, can be interpreted as the amount of metal
required to remove the said component at high concentrations. The parameter
of ka signifies the transition between the Fmin and Fmax. Higher values of ka will
result in a very steep transition between the Fmin and Fmax, essentially
improving the removal efficiencies. Conversely, lower values of ka will result
in a mild transition and thus decreasing the removal efficiencies.

284 Other Models
It is important to highlight here regarding the fate of the removed soluble

components. As, the flocculation process does not cause any mass loss, the
removed soluble compounds are just converted into their particulate state. The
si, scol and snd are just transformed to xi, xs and xns states respectively.
It should be noted that the value of these parameters depends on the

environmental conditions temperature, pH, mixing, and wastewater
characteristics. Therefore, it is recommended that adequate calibration is
performed to find the appropriate values for specific cases.
Grit Chamber
The model associated with this object is a simple empirical model where grit
production is directly proportional to the flow coming in the grit chamber. The
amount of grit produced (in grams per m3 of influent) is user specified.
Disinfection Unit
EMPIRICAL MODEL (EMPIRIC) WITH CHLORINE

DISINFECTION
The empiric model associated with this object computes the fraction of
surviving E. coli based on the detention time in the disinfection unit. The state
variables are not affected by this model. The following equation is used as the
model for computing the surviving fraction:
survecoli = exp(− kill × ccl2 × t det )
where:
survecoli = fraction of surviving E.coli
kill = rate of kill (m 3/g/min)
ccl2 = chlorine dosage (g/m 3)
tdet = detention time (computed from volume /flow rate)
The chlorine dosage, rate of kill , and volume of the unit are specified as operational
parameters.

Other Models 285
WERF MODEL (WERFUV) WITH UV DISINFECTION

The werfuv model is based upon an empirical model presented in a 1995 WERF
report comparing UV irradiation to chlorination (Water Environment Research
Foundation, 1995). The model estimates the effluent coliform density:
N = f (D )
n
where:
N = effluent coliform density (MPN/100mL)
D = UV dose (mW·s/cm3)
n = empirical coefficient related to UV dose (unitless)
f = empirical water quality factor (unitless)
The empirical water quality factor, f, was determined from regression to be

described by:
f = A(SS ) (UFT )
a b
where:
SS = suspended solids concentration (mg/L)
UFT = unfiltered UV transmittance at 253.7nm (fraction)
A,a,b = empirical coefficients (unitless)
Dewatering
Three models are associated with this object: simple, press and asce.
In the model, the user inputs two operational parameters: solids capture (%), and
simple
polymer dosage (g/m3). From these two parameters, the dewatering parameters (under
Parameters > Calibration ) and the input solids concentration (Xi), the cake (Xs) and centrate
(Xo) solids concentrations are calculated:
 solidscapture 
X o = 1 − × Xi
 100 

286 Other Models
The optimal polymer dosage and sludge treatability are used to define the performance of the
unit. The minimal sludge concentration for processing is a limit concentration under which the
unit will not operate. The cake dry material content is a function of the treatability and the
expected content from easy to treat sludge at optimal polymer dosage, hard to treat sludge at
optimal , and no polymer dosage.
Using the following mass balance, the output flow rates (Qo and Qs) can be computed:
Qi X i = Qo X o + Qs X x
The press model is based on the simple model but has, in addition, a parameter for the filter
press surface area and a maximum load on the press . These two parameters are used to model
the reduced efficiency of dewatering as the loading on the press increases.
The asce model is based on a paper by the Task Committee on Belt Filter Presses for the
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE, 1988). Based on this work, which involved
information collected as part of a survey through the United States, a relationship was
developed between the feed solids and cake concentration. The primary sludge fraction (i.e.
percent of sludge for processing originating from primary sludge) is the main parameter
in determining the cake solids from the unit. The solids capture is used to determine the
centrate solids concentration and the developed relationship is used to determine the cake
solids. A material balance is used to determine the two output flows.
The dewatering object should not be confused with the thickener object. The thickener is
configured like a nonreactive settling tank. The sedimentation models are described in
Chapter 7.
Black Box
The Black Box object contains three models: empiric , pipe, and shuffler .
EMPIRIC MODEL
The empiric model contains a number of empirical equations that can be set up
to change the value of the BOD, TKN and the suspended solids between the
input connection point and the output connection point.
The available regression equations are:
1) constant;
2) proportional;
3) linear;
4) quadratic;
5) exponential;

Other Models 287
6) power; or
7) user-defined.
After choosing the correlation type, the user specifies what variable is the
independent variable (either influent flow, influent concentration or both). Finally,
the user must supply the parameters in the regression equation. See Figure 11-5
for typical equations that can be set up using the Black Box object.
One independent variable (solids), with proportional regression

X out = 0.4 ∗ X in
Two independent variables (flow and concentration), with linear regression

X out = 10 + (0.1 ∗ X in ) + (0.001 ∗ Qin )
Figure 11-5 Typical Regression Equation
PIPE MODEL
The pipe model can be used to simulate the lag effect caused by significant
residence times in pipes or channels between unit process objects. By default,
GPS-X does not simulate any travel time between objects.
The pipe model is a plug-flow tank model without any biological reactions.
INTERCHANGE MODEL
The interchange model is an empirical model that can be used to transfer
concentrations between state variables. Note that this is a “mapping function”
(which doesn’t necessarily obey mass balance, etc.) and should only be used
for advanced applications.
There are two options available to specify the state variable mapping – from
menu , and from custom macro :
from menu – menu is used to specify the outgoing state variable for each
incoming state variable (see Figure 11-6).

288 Other Models
Figure 11-6 Specifying the outgoing state variable in the interchange model
from custom macro - state variable mapping is specified in the custom macro file
in the interchange model file (accessible by selecting the
interchange model twice). More advanced mapping
calculations can be performed in the custom macro (see
Figure 11-7). For details on how to write custom
calculations, see the Customizing GPS-X chapter in the
User’s Guide.

Other Models 289
Figure 11-7 Custom interchange macro

Tools Object 291
CHAPTER 12
Tools Object
This chapter discusses the models found in the Tools Object. Each model is listed in
separate sections below.
Data Transfer
The datatransfer model is used for transferring data between GPS-X data files and ACSL.
When data is read from GPS-X's .dat files, it can only be displayed on graphs or
controllers. With the datatran model, this data is sent to a data array and therefore is
available for processing by ACSL commands (e.g. through the Command : line in the
Simulation Control window).
The data transfer parameters are accessed by selecting Parameters > Set up in the Process
Data menu. These parameters are detailed below:
data variable name: This is the cryptic name of the data variable found in the .dat file.
data transfer (ON – OFF): This switch activates the data transfer.
Sampler
The sampler model will sample any stream either at regular time intervals (i.e., take a
sample every `x' hours) or in proportion to the flow rate of that stream (take a sample
every `x' m3 of flow). It reports either daily or total simulation run average values.
The sampling tool parameters are accessed by selecting Parameters > Set up in the Process
label of sample stream : This is the label of the stream being sampled. All of the state and
composite variables in this stream are sampled.
sampling mode ( Off / Flow Proportional / Regular Time Intervals ):

This switch controls how the
stream is sampled. The stream can be sampled in proportion to the flow or at regular time
intervals.

292 Tools Object
sampling period ( Daily / Total Run ): This is the time period used when calculating the
averages of the sampled values. The averages can be calculated on a daily basis or for the
entire run.
take a sample every (m3): This parameter controls how often the stream is sampled when the
sampling mode is set to Flow Proportional .
take a sample every (hour):This parameter controls how often the stream is sampled when
the sampling mode is set to Regular Time Intervals .
PH Tool
The ph tool allows the user to estimate the pH of a wastewater stream in the layout, or do
a pH estimation directly from parameters entered into the menu. These two options are
available in the pH Model Set up menu (Figure 12-1).
Figure 12-1 pH Model Set up Menu

Tools Object 293
The pH model operation menu item specifies whether the calculation is a stand alone pH
estimation using the components under the Wastewater Components (stand-alone model)
header, or uses the components from a specific flow point in the plant layout.
If you select link pH estimation to label , the calculation will use the concentrations of
ammonia, nitrate, etc., from the stream label specified in label of point where pH is to be
estimated . If you would like to estimate the pH at several different points throughout the
plant, place one ToolBox object per pH calculation into the layout, and link each box to a
different point in the layout where pH is to be estimated.
The calculation is based on a model developed by Vavilin et al. (1995). The model is
simplified to include only strong bases, strong acids, total ammonia, total acetate, and
total carbon dioxide. The model uses an iterative process, in combination with the
concentration of each component, to determine the pH value.
The relationship between the concentration of a component and the concentration of its
ions is related through a dissociation constant (K). The concentration of hydrogen ion is
used to determine pH:
[H ] = 10
+ − pH
The initial pH identified on the pH solver set up control form is used to calculate the
initial concentration of hydrogen ion. An example of this control form is shown in Figure
12-1. The default initial guess for pH is 7.
A second control form, shown in Figure 12-2, is used to input various equilibrium and
temperature constants.

294 Tools Object
Figure 12-2 Component Control Form

These concentrations are used in a series of five equilibrium equations that form the basis
for the pH model:
[ammonium] = K n [totalammon
K
ia ]
[H ] + K
+ n
[OH ] = Kw
[
H + ]
[acetate] = K a ⋅ [totalaceta te]
[H ] + K+
a
K ⋅ [H ]⋅ [totalCO ]
+
[bicarbonate] = c1 2
(K ⋅ [H ]) + (K ⋅ K ) + [H ]
c1
+
c1 c2
+ 2
(K c1 ⋅ K c 2 ) ⋅ [totalCO2 ]
[carbonate] =
(K c1 ⋅ [H + ]) + (K c1 ⋅ K c 2 ) + [H +
]
2

Tools Object 295
where Kn = ammonium dissociation constant (mol/L)

Ka = acetate dissociation constant (mol/L)
Kw = water dissociation constant (mol/L)
Kc1 = CO2 dissociation constant – step 1 (mol/L)

Kc2 = CO2 dissociation constant – step 2 (mol/L)
The dissociation constants used in these equations can also be input on the control form
shown in Figure 12-2. The default dissociation constants are taken from the literature.
The ammonium dissociation constant is corrected for temperature.
To properly reflect the presence/absence of added alkalinity (lime addition, etc.) the
alkalinity state variable salk is assumed to be all carbonate alkalinity that is available (and
completely dissociated) for acid neutralization.
In the above equations, totalCO2 is the total CO2 available (converted to equivalent
charge). Because the alkalinity is assumed to be in the form of completely dissociated
CaCO3, a 2+ charge cation is also assumed present in the equilibrium system.
The above equations are combined with the charge balance shown below:
0 = [H+] + [NH4+] - [NO3-] - [HCO3-] - 2[CO2-] - [OH-] + cations – anions + 2[salk]
An implicit nonlinear equation solver is used to solve this system of equations for [H+].
The calculated pH values are bounded by the low bound and high bound parameters shown
in Figure 12-1.
Once the solution is complete and the concentrations of the ionized components have
been calculated, the concentrations of the non-ionized components are calculated from
the speciation equation shown above.
The calculated pH and the concentrations of the individual components can be displayed
on an output form similar to that shown in Figure 12-3.

296 Tools Object
Figure 12-3 Sample pH Outputs
This pH model is also used in the HPO (High-Purity Oxygen) object for pH estimation.
Low-Pass Filtering
The lowpass model can be used for analog or digital filtering, or a combination of both.
The input signal is fed to a first-order analog filter, a first-order digital filter, and a zero-
order sample-and-hold. Any of these components may be used or bypassed. This is done
by setting the filter type as Analog , Digital , or Analog+Digital , and by setting sample and hold to
either ON or OFF. When the filter type is set to OFF, both filters are bypassed and the final
output is either the input signal or the sampled input signal, depending on the state of the
sample and hold setting. A signal flow diagram is shown in Figure 12-4. In this figure, the
switches are set for a digital filter with sampling.
First-order linear filters have one tuning parameter, the cutoff frequency ωc, which
corresponds to the corner frequency, i.e. the reciprocal of the filter time constant. The
amplitude ratio of a first-order system at the corner frequency is 1/√2, with corresponding
phase lag φ=45 degrees’
With u(t) and y(t) representing the input and output of a first-order filter respectively, the
filter models are:
dy (t )
ω c (u (t ) − y (t )) (analog)
dt
Tools Object 297
Figure 12-4 Signal Flow Diagram for the Lowpass Model
( )
y (t ) = e −ω c ∆t y (t − ∆t ) + 1 − e −ω c ∆t u (t ) (digital)
One menu of parameters is defined for the lowpass model. It is accessed from the Tools
Process Data menu by selecting Parameters > Filter Settings . The available parameters are
detailed below:
input signal : The cryptic name of the variable to be filtered.
filter type (Analog / Digital / Analog+Digital / Off):

The value of this parameter determines
whether the signal flows through the analog or the digital filter, or both.
analog filter cutoff frequency:

The corner frequency of the first-order analog filter, or the
reciprocal of its time constant.
digital filter time step :

The value of the time interval used in the digital filter model. It is
also used as the sampling time when Sample and hold is set to ON.
digital filter cutoff frequency :

The corner frequency of the first-order digital filter, or the
sample and hold (ON - OFF): The value of this parameter determines if the digital filter
output is sampled and held for the sampling period specified above.
Digital filtering without sampling is useful if the filtered signal is to be used in a unit that
already implements a sample-and-hold on its input.
On/Off Control
On/off controllers are a simple form of feedback control. This type of controller is used in
a wide variety of common applications. For example, household heating and cooling
systems operate using on/off control.

298 Tools Object
USING ON/OFF CONTROLLERS

An on/off controller model (onoff ) is available in the Tools object. Once this
model has been selected, several parameters can be adjusted. These parameters
are divided into two groups: control variable parameters, and manipulated
variable parameters. The control variable parameters are accessed by selecting
Parameters > Control Variable from the Tools Process Data menu. The manipulated
variable parameters are accessed by selecting Parameters > Manipulated Variable
from the Tools Process Data menu.
Control Variable Parameters

controller (ON - OFF): A value of ON indicates that the controller is active; a
value of OFF indicates that the controller is not active (i.e., not adjusting the
manipulated variable). This should not be confused with the òn' and òff' states
of the on/off controller.
controller sampling time: This parameter determines the length of time between
controller executions. A high value (corresponding to a long interval between
executions) may be appropriate for slower processes (e.g., MLSS control using
the sludge wastage rate), while other processes may require faster sampling
frequencies.
control variable (CV) with label : The cryptic name of the variable to be controlled.
upper bound : The upper bound on the controlled variable. If the value of the
controlled variable exceeds this value, then the value of the manipulated
variable will be set to its low setting.
lower bound : The lower bound on the controlled variable. If the value of the
controlled variable is less than this value, then the value of the manipulated
variable will be set to its high setting.
Manipulated Variable Parameters

manipulated variable (MV) with label : The cryptic name of the manipulated variable.
MV setting when CV is at low limit :

The value of the manipulated variable is set to
this value when the value of the controlled variable is less than its lower bound.
MV setting when CV is at high limit :

The value of the manipulated variable is set to
this value when the value of the controlled variable exceeds its upper bound.
MV initial value:The value to assign to the manipulated variable until the

controlled variable crosses either its upper or lower bound.

Tools Object 299
PID Control
PID controllers are widely used in industrial applications because of their simplicity and
good performance. PID is an acronym for Proportional, Integral, Derivative, which are
the three modes of the PID controller. In continuous form, the PID controller algorithm is
given by:
With derivative kick protection off:
 dE (t ) 
MV (t ) = K c ⋅  E (t ) + ∫ E (τ )dτ + TD ⋅
1
+I

 TI 0 dt 
With derivative kick protection on:
 dCV (t ) 
MV (t ) = K c ⋅  E (t ) + ∫ E (τ )dτ + TD ⋅
1
+I
 T dt 
 I 0 
where
MV is the manipulated variable

CV is the controlled variable
E is the error (setpoint-controlled variable)
Kc is the proportional gain, a controller tuning constant
TI is the integral time, a controller tuning constant
TD is the derivative time, a controller tuning constant
I is the initialization constant
The individual modes of the PID controller can be used individually or in pairs; common
combinations include P-only and PI control, in addition to full PID control. The output of
the PI controller, for example, includes the first two terms in the PID controller
expression above; the output of any combination can be calculated similarly. The
proportional mode is given by:
MV p (t ) = K c E (t )
The integral mode is given by:
Kc τ
MVI =
TI ∫ E (τ )dτ
O
The derivative mode is given by:

300 Tools Object
dE (t )
MVd (t ) = K c Td ⋅ (Derivative kick protection off)
dt
dCV (t )
MVd (t ) = − K cTd ⋅ (Derivative kick protection on)
dt
IMPLEMENTATION IN GPS-X
Since the vast majority of PID controllers are now implemented using digital
computers, the discrete form of the PID algorithm is used more frequently than
its continuous form. Accordingly, all controllers in GPS-X are modelled in
discrete form. Bounds on the manipulated variable are frequently used to
reflect limitations due to physical equipment or safety. Therefore, the PID
algorithms implemented in GPS-X have the following forms, where ∆t
represents the controller execution interval:
PID in Velocity Form

 ∆t T 
∆MV N = K c  E N − E N −1 + E N + d (E N − 2 E N −1 + E N − 2 )
 TI ∆t 
 ∆t 
∆MVN = K c  EN − EN −1 + EN − d (CVN − 2CVN −1 + CVN − 2 )
T
 TI ∆t 
MVN = max(min (MVN −1 + ∆MVN , MVub ), MVlb )
PID in Position Form

 ∆t N T 
MV * N = K c  E N + ∑ Ei + d (E N − E N −1 ) +I
 TI i =1 ∆t 
 ∆t N T 
MV * N = K c  E N + ∑ Ei − d (CV N − CV N −1 ) + I
 TI i =1 ∆t 
MVN = max(min (MV * N , MVub ), MVlb )

Tools Object 301
POSITION AND VELOCITY FORMS

The velocity form is obtained by differencing the position form of the PID
controller. When using the velocity form, one calculates the change in the
value of the manipulated variable that is to be implemented, as opposed to the
absolute value calculated by the position form of the algorithm. The velocity
form has certain advantages over the position form; in particular, it is naturally
protected against reset or integral windup. This condition occurs when a
persistent, nonzero setpoint error results in a large value of the integral mode of
the PID, forcing the control action to `saturate' (i.e. to maintain the manipulated
variable at its minimum or maximum value). Even when the setpoint error
returns to zero, the control action remains saturated when the position form of
the PID algorithm is used. When using the velocity form, the control action can
return within the control range after one sampling period.
DERIVATIVE KICK PROTECTION

Derivative kick protection is a commonly used modification to the standard
PID algorithm. The modification, which affects the derivative mode only,
prevents large `jumps' from occurring in the manipulated variable as the result
of setpoint changes. These jumps occur because a discrete setpoint change
introduces a discontinuity into the error signal, resulting in an "infinite"
derivative (in the continuous case), or a large value in the difference error
signal (in the discrete case). Therefore, it is recommended that derivative kick
protection be used for all PID controllers, unless the behaviour described above
is specifically desired.
DERIVATIVE FILTERING
Derivative filtering is another strategy by which large jumps in the manipulated
variable can be prevented. Filtering reduces the effect of sudden setpoint
changes and high frequency noise present in the error signal, which may
produce large values of the error derivative. When derivative filtering is
selected, the signal fed to the derivative mode of the PID (error or controlled
variable) is passed through a discrete first-order filter before being used in the
calculation of the derivative mode. The filter is tuned by a single parameter, the
cutoff frequency, which corresponds to the filter's `corner frequency', i.e. the
PID CONTROLLER PARAMETERS

The parameters available for PID controllers are listed below. These
parameters are divided into two groups: control variable parameters, and
manipulated variable parameters. The control variable parameters are accessed
by selecting Parameters > Control Variable from the Tools Process Data menu. The

302 Tools Object
manipulated variable parameters are accessed by selecting Parameters >

Manipulated Variable from the Tools Process Data menu.
In addition to the PID controller in the tools object, PID controllers for
common variable pairings are built into many of GPS-X's process objects. For
example, a PID controller for controlling the dissolved oxygen concentration is
available in the plug flow tank object. These controllers have essentially the
same parameters as the PID controller in the tools object except that the
manipulated variable and possibly the controlled variable have already been
defined.
Control Variable Parameters

controller (ON - OFF): This parameter determines whether or not the PID
controller is active.
setpoint for control variable: This is the value of the setpoint for the controlled
variable. The controller acts to keep the controlled variable at the setpoint.
The following parameters are accessed by clicking on the More... button in the
Control Variable form. Only the parameters in the Controller Set up sub-section are
discussed here. For a discussion of the Controller Tuning sub-section see Tuning
PID Controllers (below).
controller form (Full Position / Velocity):

This parameter is used to specify which
form of the PID controller equation is used (position or velocity). The default
velocity form is recommended because it has built-in protection against
integral windup.
controller type (P / PI / PID):

This parameter specifies the modes to be used in the
PID controller. Using the PI option is recommended in most cases. When using
the P option, the offset between the controlled variable and the setpoint cannot
be completely eliminated.
control variable with label :

This is the cryptic variable name for the controlled
variable including the appended stream label.
controller sampling time:

This is the length of time between controller executions.
If this parameter is too large the control performance will be poor and possibly
unstable.
proportional gain : This is the controller tuning constant, Kc.
integral time: This is the controller tuning constant, TI.
derivative time: This is the controller tuning constant, TD.

Tools Object 303
controller effect on controlled var - direct (ON - OFF): Since the value of the
proportional gain in GPS-X must be positive, this parameter controls the
`direction' of the controller. If a positive step in the manipulated variable
results in a positive change in the controlled variable (at steady-state), i.e. the
process gain is positive, then this parameter should be ON (e.g. an increase in
air flow causes an increase in DO). Otherwise, it should be OFF (e.g. an
increase in wastage rate causes a decrease in MLSS concentration).
derivative kick protection (ON - OFF):

When this setting is ON the manipulated
variable is prevented from making large jumps in response to setpoint changes.
This parameter is only applicable when the controller type is set to PID.
derivative filtering (ON - OFF): The derivative filter is used to filter the signal fed
to the derivative mode of the PID controller.
cutoff frequency:
This is the derivative filter's corner frequency (i.e. reciprocal of
its time constant).
Manipulated Variable Parameters

manipulated variable w/o label : This is the manipulated variable name without the
stream label.
label of manipulated variable: This is the stream label of the manipulated variable.
value of manipulated variable: This is the initial value of the manipulated variable.
minimum value: This is the lower bound on the manipulated variable.
maximum value: This is the upper bound on the manipulated variable.
TUNING PID CONTROLLERS

Many different techniques exist for tuning PID controllers. While an in-depth
discussion of these techniques is beyond the scope of this manual, some
general guidelines are provided below.
A simple and conservative approach to controller tuning is as follows:
• Start with a small proportional gain and a large integral time; set the
derivative time to zero. As a rough rule of thumb:
− Use a value of 0.5/Kp as a starting value for the proportional gain
(Kp is the steady-state process gain, defined as the change in the
controlled variable at steady-state for a one-unit change in the
manipulated variable).

304 Tools Object
− Use a value of 1.5t as a starting value for the integral time (t is the
time constant of the first-order response that most closely
approximates the controlled variable response to a step in the
manipulated variable).
• Gradually increase the proportional gain until further increases result in
a deterioration in control performance.
• Gradually decrease the integral time until further decreases result in a
deterioration in control performance.
• Gradually increase the derivative time.
• Fine-tune the parameters as needed.
A facility for tuning PID controllers based on the Ciancone correlations for
setpoint changes is available for all PID controllers in GPS-X. The PID tuning
parameters calculated using the Ciancone correlations are based on estimates of
the process gain, dead time, and time constant, obtained by a least-squares fit
of the time series data collected under tuning mode.
The controller tuning parameters for the PID controller are accessed by
selecting Parameters > Control Variable > More... in the Process Data menu of the
tools object. Setting tuning to ON starts the tuning mode. The controller sampling
time must be set to an appropriate value. The process should have been brought
to steady-state, or reasonably close to steady-state, prior to the activation of the
tuning mode. This may be done with or without a PID controller currently ON.
While this mode is active, a step input is applied to the manipulated variable,
forcing the controlled variable to be perturbed.
This mode may be deactivated by manually setting Tuning to OFF, at which

point suggested PID tuning parameters will be displayed in the simulation Log
window, based on an analysis of the time series data collected during the
tuning operation. It is not necessary to wait for a new steady-state before
turning off the tuning operation, but it may be desirable to do so. Tuning
parameters will also be suggested if the simulation terminates while the tuning
mode is ON.
The estimates of the process parameters (i.e. process gain, dead time, and time
constant) may be tagged for display in the Display Variables menu of the object
or stream associated with the controller.
The other settings which affect the operation of the tuning mode are:
fractional step size:

The size of the step to be applied in the manipulated variable,
specified as a fraction of its initial value.

Tools Object 305
time of step :
The interval of time that will elapse between the activation of the
tuning mode and the application of a step in the manipulated variable.
maximum possible dead time: Upper bound on admissible values of dead time in
the first-order plus dead time model. This may be used to reduce the time
required to compute tuning constants, or may be used to force a dead time of
zero in the model used to derive the tuning constants.
While operating in tuning mode, time series data of the manipulated and
controlled variables are sampled (at each controller sampling time) and stored
in arrays of fixed maximum size. Data for 3000 sampling times can be stored.
If that capacity is to be exceeded, a warning will be displayed, and a scrolling
time window that will retain data for the last 3000 sampling times will be
initialized. This should not be a limitation in most cases, as this storage
capacity is enough for data sampled every 10 minutes over 20 days. The
storage capacity is a global setting labeled controller tuning array size, found in
General Data > System > Parameters > miscellaneous . If this value is increased, the
layout must be recompiled for the change to take effect, i.e., this value may not
be changed inside a scenario.
For more information on tuning PID controllers, consult Marlin (1995) or Perry
and Chilton (1973). The Ciancone correlations are presented and discussed in
Marlin (1995).
Feedforward-Feedback Controllers
In feedforward control, an input disturbance is measured and the controller adjusts the
manipulated variable to compensate for the disturbance before the controlled variable
deviates from its setpoint. Feedforward control is usually combined with feedback control
to retain the beneficial properties of feedback.
The pidforward model of the Tools object combines a PID controller for feedback and a
lead/lag algorithm for feedforward control. Lead/lag feedforward control is a simple
feedforward strategy that provides enough flexibility for most applications. The PID
controller algorithm is presented in the section entitled PID Controllers above. In this
section we present the lead/lag algorithm.
A feedforward term may be added to the feedback control action of the PID controller
when measurement of a process disturbance is available. The lead/lag feedforward
controller is represented in transfer function form as:
τ ld s + 1
MVFF (s ) = − K FF e −θs D(s )
τ lg s + 1
and its time-domain representation is given by:

306 Tools Object
dMVFF (t )  dD(t − θ ) 
τ lg ⋅ + MVFF (t ) = − K FF τ ld + D(t − θ ) + I FF
dt  dt 
where
MVFF is the additional control action provided by feedforward control
D is the measured disturbance
KFF is the feedforward gain, a controller tuning parameter
θ is the feedforward dead time, a controller tuning parameter
τld is the feedforward lead time, a controller tuning parameter
τlg is the feedforward lag time, a controller tuning parameter
IFF is the initialization constant of the feedforward controller
When both the process and disturbance dynamics are represented by first-order plus dead
time models, perfect feedforward control can in principle be achieved if one:
• sets the feedforward gain KFF to the disturbance-to-process gain ratio;
• the dead time θ to the difference between disturbance and process dead times
(possible only when the process dead time is less than the disturbance dead time);
• τld the lead time to the process time constant; and,
• the lag time τlg to the disturbance time constant.
IMPLEMENTATION IN GPS-X
The feedback control action is calculated from a PID control algorithm as
described above, and the feedforward control action is added to it as follows.
Feedforward/Feedback (PID in velocity form):
{ {
MVN = max min MVN −1 + ∆ MV FB
N + ∆ MV N , MVub MVlb
FF
} }
Feedforward/Feedback (PID in position form):
{ {
MVN = max min MVN * + ∆MV N , MVub MVlb
FF
} }

Tools Object 307
where ΔMVNFF is the change in feedforward control action obtained from

discretizing the lead/lag algorithm and the superscript FF refers to the feedback
controller.
FEEDFORWARD CONTROLLER PARAMETERS

The parameters of the pidforward model are presented in three menus:
Manipulated Variable, Controlled Variable, and Disturbance Variable. Feedback
control parameters are located in the Controlled Variable menu, and feedforward
control parameters in the Disturbance Variable menu.
The feedforward controller parameters found in the Disturbance Variable form

are detailed as:
feedforward controller (ON - OFF): The feedforward component of the controller

is activated by this switch.
disturbance variable with label : The cryptic name of the disturbance variable
including the stream label.
controller sampling time: The length of time between controller executions.
feedforward gain : The feedforward controller tuning parameter, KFF.
lead time: The feedforward controller tuning parameter, τld.
lag time: The feedforward controller tuning parameter, τlg. The ratio of lead to
lag times should usually be kept below 2:1 to minimize the effects of noise.
dead time: The feedforward controller tuning parameter, θ.
negative feedforward gain (ON - OFF): This parameter controls the `direction' of
the controller. The `normal' sign of the feedforward gain is negative. This
occurs when both the process and disturbance gains have the same sign, in
which case this setting should be ON (the default value). Otherwise, it should be
OFF.
For information on tuning Feedforward/Feedback controllers, consult Marlin

(1995).
Timer Control
The timer is used to schedule and control intermittent plant operations. For example the
timer control can be used to implement intermittent aeration in an activated sludge tank.
Another application is the desludging of a primary settler.

308 Tools Object
The timer works in cycles. At the start of each cycle the timer sets its manipulated variable
to a pre-defined ‘on’ value. The manipulated variable is kept at this value for a
user-defined fraction of the cycle. For the remainder of the cycle, the manipulated
variable is set to a pre-defined ‘off’ value. This is ideally suited for intermittent aeration
because the controller can turn on the air flow at regular intervals for a user defined
length of time.
The timer control parameters are accessed by selecting Parameters > Set up in the Process
controller (ON - OFF): This switch activates the timer.
manipulated variable with label : The cryptic name of the manipulated variable including the
appended stream label.
cycletime: The length of one cycle.
ontime in one cycle: The length of time (starting at the beginning of the cycle) that
manipulated variable value is set to the òn' value during a cycle.
value of manipulated variable when on : The òn' value of manipulated variable.
value of manipulated variable when off : The òff' value of manipulated variable.
Multivariable Controllers
The multivar model is used in conjunction with the Advanced Control Module. See the
Advanced Control Module Manual for details on using multivariable controllers in
GPS-X.
Flow Timer Model

The Flow Timer Model is a modification of the Timer model GPS-X. The Flow Timer
Model is developed to address the specific needs to define daily intermittent flows using
average daily flow rates. The main difference between the timer and flow timer model is
in the choice of input variable. In the timer model, the input values of the variables are
instantaneous values while in the Flow Timer Model, the flow variables are the average
value in the cycle. The Flow Timer Model can be accessed from the tool box object
(Figure 12-5).

Tools Object 309
Figure 12-5 Selecting the Flow Timer Model
MODEL DATA INPUT
The input form for the Flow Timer Model is as shown in Figure 12-6.
Figure 12-6 Flow Timer Menu

Controller – The controller switch is used to turn the flow timer model ON/OFF. Flow
will be controlled, only when the controller is switched ON.
Manipulated variable with label – This input variable is used to specify the cryptic
variable name of the flow variable that needs to be controlled.
Cycletime – This input variable is used to specify the total duration of the cycle including
the ON and OFF time.
Starttime for ON cycle – This input variable controls the start time of the cycle.

310 Tools Object
Ontime in one cycle – This input variable defines the duration of ON cycle.
Average value of manipulated variable during cycle – This input variable defines the
average flow rate during the whole cycle.
The default setup of the flow controller defines a cycle of total length of 0.05d, the cycle
remains OFF for 0.01d, gets ON at 0.01d and remains ON until 0.04d. The flow is OFF
from 0.4d-0.5d. This cycle then repeats itself.
Scheduler Model
Some of the operations at wastewater treatment plant follow a repeating schedule. For
example, the sludge wasting schedule may require wasting on the weekdays and no
wastage on weekends. Until now, these repeating schedules were modeled by inputting
the scheduled inputs through a file input. This approach requires preparation of file inputs
for the duration of dynamic simulation. To simplify modeling a repeating schedule, a new
scheduler model is implemented in the toolbox object of the GPS-X. The structure of the
scheduler model is generic and can be used to model cyclic schedules of operation in a
treatment plant. The scheduler model can control flow rates, split ration and any other
model input variable.
The scheduler model can be selected by right-clicking on the tool box object and
selecting scheduler. The scheduler model is useful when the treatment plant is operated in
a well-defined cycle containing many different phases and in each phase a set of model
variables is manipulated in a well-defined manner. In the current scheduler model, a set
of 15 model variables can be manipulated to define complex operational schedules in
treatment plants.
Figure 12-7 Selecting the Scheduler Model
MODEL DATA INPUT

Tools Object 311
Scheduler model requires following information:
a) Number of phase in a cycle
b) Time duration of each phase
c) Cryptic names of model variables which are manipulated in a cycle
d) Value of each model variable in each phase of the cycle
The input data to the model is set by using the input form of the scheduler model. The
input data form is as shown in Figure 2. A brief explanation of each input variable is
given below.
Number of phase in sequence – This variable defines the number of distinctive phases
in a cyclic-sequence. The default value is set to 8.
Duration of each phase – This variable defines the time duration of each phase. The sum
of the time duration of each phase is equal to the total sequence (cycle) time. The Figure
3 shows the input form for setting the duration of each phase.
Cycle start phase – This define the phase at which the cycle starts. The value of the
variable can be between 1 to number of phases defined above.
Cryptic name of model variables– This defines the cryptic names of the model
variables which are manipulated in each phase. By default, a maximum of 10 model
variables can be used to set the sequence. All the variables are set to blank (nothing is
manipulated in the sequence). To include a model variable in the scheduler set-up, the
blank should be replaced by the full cryptic name of the variable available in the layout.
For example, to set the influent flow rate for an influent object in the sequence, the blank
variable can be replaced by qconinf (qcon is the cryptic for influent flow rate and inf is
the stream id). If there are more than one variable, they can be similarly defined.
Tip: To see the cryptic name of a variable, you may point the cursor over the variable
description name in the data input window. The cryptic variable name is displayed for
few seconds in a small window.
Value of model variable in each phase - The value of a model variable during each phase
can be set here. For example, to set the values of control variable in each phase, click on
the button to the right of control variable to open the input value form for
model variable (Figure 4).

312 Tools Object
Figure 12-8 Input form for the “scheduler” model
Figure 12-9 Input form for setting duration of each phase

Tools Object 313
Figure 12-10 Input form for setting the value of a control variable in each phase of a
sequence

Operating Cost Models 315
CHAPTER 13
Operating Cost Models
Introduction
GPS-X contains operating cost models for most of the objects in the process table. Each
object can be set up to calculate costs for energy, chemical dosage and sludge handling
(as appropriate to that object).
This chapter discusses the structure of the operating cost models, and their use and
calibration.
Model Structure
For each of the wastewater unit process objects in GPS-X, a set of operating costs has
been assigned. These costs reflect the typical operating costs associated with that
particular unit process.
GPS-X can be used to dynamically simulate these operating costs in the same way that it
dynamically simulates the wastewater unit process itself.
The 5 different types of operating costs modelled are:
• Aeration energy cost

• Pumping energy cost
• Miscellaneous energy cost
• Chemical dosage cost
• Sludge handling cost
The following sections describe each cost in detail.
AERATION ENERGY COST

An aeration energy cost can be calculated for unit processes that have aeration,
such as the CSTR, plug flow tanks, SBR, etc. The amount of energy required to
supply the calculated level of aeration depends on several factors, including
blower/compressor efficiency, headloss, etc., and the factors included in the
oxygen transfer model (See Modelling of O2 Transfer in Chapter 5).

316 Operating Cost Models
GPS-X can simulate two different aeration methods - mechanical and diffused
air. If mechanical aeration is chosen, an aeration power (kW) is entered. If
diffused aeration is chosen, the power requirement is calculated as shown in
Equations 6.27 and 6.28 in Chapter 6.
The wire power is multiplied by the energy price ($/kWh), and then integrated
over time to determine the total cost for aeration energy during the simulation.
BLOWER ENERGY COST

Energy required for the pumping of water and wastewater is modelled in GPS-
X using the following equation:
waterflow head
⋅
86.4 × 10 H 2 Odens
7
energy =
blowereff
where
energy = aeration energy required (kW)

air flow = air flow into tank (m3/d)
head = hydraulic head (m)
H2Odens = density of water (N/m3)
blowereff = pump efficiency (unitless)
The energy value is multiplied by the energy price ($/kWh), and integrated
over time to determine the total cost for aeration energy during the simulation.
For blower energy costs, the head value represents the sum of the actual head
and the piping headloss. There is no additional equipment headloss as with
aeration energy costs.
MISCELLANEOUS ENERGY COST

The miscellaneous energy cost model describes the use of energy for various
mechanical operations such as gates, arms, rakes, mixers, moving bridges, etc.
Due to the complex nature of estimating these types of energy requirements,

users are required to input a flat rate of energy usage (kW). This value is
multiplied by the energy price ($/kWh) and integrated over time to determine
the total cost for the simulation.

CHEMICAL DOSAGE COST

Some unit process objects in GPS-X allow for chemical addition as part of
treatment (some influents, equalization tank, DAF, dewatering units, etc.).
In each case, the total chemical dosage cost is:
chemical cos tperday = chemprice ⋅ chemdosagerate
where
chemicalcostperday = chemical dosage cost ($/d)

chemprice = chemical price ($/kg)
chemdosagerate = hydraulic head (kg/d)
This daily cost is integrated over time to determine a total cost for the
simulation.
SLUDGE DISPOSAL
Several objects in GPS-X have connection points which represent thickened or
dewatered sludge (e.g. dewatering unit). A sludge disposal cost can be
associated with these flows to determine a sludge handling cost.
The cost is determined by multiplying the per-unit disposal cost by the rate of
sludge disposal:
disposal cos tperday = disposal cos t ⋅ sludgerate
where
disposalcostperday = sludge disposal cost ($/d)

disposalcost = disposal price ($/m3)
sludgerate = sludge disposal rate (m3/d)
This daily cost is integrated over time to determine a total sludge disposal cost
for the simulation.
Operating Cost Model Parameters

Operating cost parameters are found in two places:
• General Data forms (right-click on an open spot in the layout)

− these forms contain general operating cost parameters that apply to the entire
layout: e.g. energy prices and schedules.
• Operating Cost parameter forms in each object

− these forms contain operating cost parameters that are specific to each object:
e.g. headloss, pump efficiency, chemical cost.
GENERAL OPERATING COST PARAMETERS

Operating cost variables controlling the price of energy can be found in the
Options > General Data > System > Parameters > Operating Cost menu (See Figure
13-1).
Figure 13-1 General Data Operating Cost Data
The price of energy can be set in two different ways, by selecting from the
Energy Pricing menu:
• Constant Price
• Time-based Pricing (energy price varies throughout the day)
When Constant Price is selected, the energy price is set to the value entered on
the form. This value can be changed in a scenario or by placing the price on an
interactive controller, or set constant for the entire simulation.
When Time-based Pricing is selected, the energy price will cycle through a user-
defined set of prices on a user-defined schedule. The number of different
energy prices is unlimited. This mode can be used to simulate lower energy
costs during the night.

OBJECT-SPECIFIC OPERATING COST PARAMETERS

For all objects, the operating cost model parameters can be found in the
Parameters > Operating Cost menu, and its associated More... button. The values
entered on these forms are specific to each object. These objects can be tagged
and placed on controllers, etc., as with any other parameter.
Figure 13-2 Operating Cost Menu
The operating cost model parameters shown in the Operating Cost parameters
form depend on the object and choice of model.
Operating Cost Model Display Variables

Similar to the operating cost parameters, the associated display variables are divided into
general and object-specific groups.
GENERAL OPERATING COST DISPLAY VARIABLES

Operating cost display variables can be selected from the Options > General Data
> System > Display Variables > Operating Cost menu. These display variables
include the energy price; total energy, chemical and sludge disposal costs for
the entire layout; and the total operational cost for the layout (sum of the total
energy, chemical and sludge disposal costs).

Figure 13-3 Layout Operating Cost Display Form (total for all objects)
OBJECT-SPECIFIC OPERATING COST DISPLAY VARIABLES

For all objects, operating cost model display variables can be selected from the
Display Variables > Operating Cost menu by right clicking on the effluent
connection point.
The display variables available include energy usage and sludge disposal rates
as well as total energy, chemical and disposal costs for that particular object.
The specific costs calculated (and available in this menu) depend on the
operating costs associated with the particular object and model.

Figure 13-4 Object-Specific Operating Cost Display Form
Calibration of Operating Cost Models

The operating cost models in GPS-X are designed to simulate typical operating costs
found in typical wastewater treatment facilities. The models are populated with
parameters that give costs for typical plants.
To calibrate the models to the behavior of the plant being simulated, the user will need to
adjust various parameters in the models. This list can be useful in guiding calibration:
AERATION:
- Enter the hydraulic head and headloss for the system if known. Otherwise, use
the defaults. Calibrate with the blower efficiency and diffuser headloss.
PUMPING:
- Enter the hydraulic head and headloss for the system if known. Otherwise, use
the defaults. Calibrate with the pump efficiency and/or piping headloss.

CHEMICAL DOSAGE & SLUDGE DISPOSAL:

- As these calculations are a flat "flow multiplied by price" calculation, the
model is calibrated by adjusting the price parameter (flow is calculated or set
elsewhere).
MISCELLANEOUS:
- The miscellaneous energy use is a flat rate, so it is calibrated by adjusting this
rate as appropriate.
Operating Costs for Each Object

Table 13-1 outlines the operating costs assigned to each object in GPS-X. In some cases,
the presence of the cost may depend on the model chosen for that object.
Table 13-1 Operating Costs Applied to Each Object/Model

Object Model Aeration Pumping Sludge Chemical Misc.
Energy Disposal Addition Energy
CONTINUOUS acetate X
INFLUENT asm2 X
bodbased X
methanol X
states X
water X
BATCH acetate X
INFLUENT asm2 X
bodbased X
methanol X
states X
water X
CONTROL SPLITTER default X
EQUALIZATION noreact X X
TANK chemdos X X X
GRIT CHAMBER empiric X X
CSTR asm3 X X X
filament X X X
iawprc X X X
mantis X X X
reduced X X
PLUG FLOW TANK asm3 X X X
iawprc X X X
mantis X X X
DUAL INLET asm3 X X X
PLUG FLOW TANK mantis X X X

DEEP SHAFT mantis X

TRICKLING FILTER mantis X
AERATED BIOFILTER mantis X X
Object Model Aeration Pumping Sludge Chemical Misc.

Energy Disposal Addition Energy
SUBMERGED mantis X
BIOLOGICAL
CONTACTOR
ROTATING mantis X
BIOLOGICAL
CONTACTOR
SEQUENCING asm3 X X X
BATCH mantis X X X
REACTOR nrmantis X X X
ANAEROBIC basic X X
DIGESTER
THICKENER simple1d X X X
DISSOLVED AIR simple1d X X X
FLOTATION
DEWATERING asce X X X X
press X X X X
simple X X X X
CIRCULAR mantis1d X X X
PRIMARY noreac1d X X X
SETTLER sim2d X X X
simple1d X X X
RECTANGULAR mantis1d X X X
PRIMARY noreac1d X X X
SETTLER sim2d X X X
simple1d X X X
CIRCULAR mantis1d X X X
SECONDARY noreac1d X X X
CLARIFIER point X X
sim2d X X X
simple1d X X X
RECTANGULAR mantis1d X X X
SECONDARY noreac1d X X X
CLARIFIER sim2d X X X
simple1d X X X
SAND FILTER continuo X
us
massbal X

simple1d X
UASB mantis2 X X
SLUDGE mantis2 X X
PRETREATMENT
DISINFECTION empiric X
UNIT werfuv X

Optimizer 325
CHAPTER 14
Optimizer
Introduction
This chapter describes the GPS-X optimizer and its associated forms. More detail on the
maximum likelihood objective function and the statistical tests provided in the solution
report can be found in Appendix A and Appendix B, and the Optimizer Solution Report,
respectively, in this chapter. The complete list of nomenclature used is found in Appendix
C: Nomenclature, of this chapter. The references cited in this chapter are listed in
Appendix D: References, also in this chapter.
When using the optimizer in GPS-X it is recommended that layouts be built in double
precision. Switch to double precision by selecting the Double Precision option in the
Options > Preferences > Build tab.
Optimizer Description
The optimizer is a module designed to minimize the value of a user-selected objective
function by adjusting the free variables in this function. In the case of parameter
estimation, these free variables are the unknown process parameters. The optimizer uses
the Nelder-Mead simplex method (Press et al., 1986) for minimization. The algorithm has
been modified to handle bounds on the optimization (i.e. free) variables.
The simplex method is a multi-dimensional procedure that does not rely on gradient
information. The algorithm searches through the multidimensional "surface" using a
direct search method to find a local minimum of the objective function.
The procedure starts with an initial point in the multi-dimensional parameter space and
then generates new points in space by perturbing the initial point a scaled amount along
each parameter direction. This leads to p + 1 points in space that define a polyhedron (the
simplex) where p is the number of optimization variables. The points are called the
vertices of the simplex.
At each iteration, the simplex method reflects the vertex with the highest function value
(worst point) through the centroid of the remaining p points of the polyhedron. The
amount of reflection is controlled by a reflection constant . If the reflected vertex is the new
best point (lowest function value) then the polyhedron is expanded along the direction of

326 Optimizer
reflection. The amount of expansion is controlled by an expansion constant . If the

expanded vertex is better than the reflected vertex it is taken as the new best point.
If after the reflection step the reflected vertex is worse than the second worst vertex on
the previous iteration, the polyhedron is contracted. The reflected vertex is contracted
through the centroid of the remaining p vertices if it is the new worst point. If the
reflected vertex is the new second worst point, the worst point is contracted through the
centroid. The amount of contraction is controlled by a contraction constant .
When a contraction step is unsuccessful, the polyhedron is shrunk by moving the vertices
toward the best point. The amount of shrinkage is controlled by a shrink constant .
At each step checks are made to ensure that the parameter bounds have not been violated.
If they have been, the new vertex is moved back inside the bounds.
When the optimizer termination criteria are satisfied, the optimizer runs one additional
simulation using the parameter values from the best point found during the iteration
process. There is the possibility of encountering a local minimum that is not the global
minimum of the objective function. This is a problem that is common to most
optimization algorithms. As a result, it is important to solve optimization problems (e.g.
parameter estimation or process optimization problems) from a number of different
starting guesses to ensure that the optimizer has found the global minimum.
If the user requests the printing of confidence limits or derivative information (See
Summary of the Optimizer Settings and Parameters (below)) the optimizer conducts
additional simulations to generate numerical derivatives.
The constants that control the reflection, expansion, contraction, and shrinkage of the
polyhedron in the simplex method can be accessed by selecting General Data > System >
Parameters > Optimizer and then clicking on the More... button in the Static sub-section. The
resulting form is shown in
Figure 14-1. You can change any of the constant values if you wish. The parameter
entitled scaled step size in initial guess is used to control the initial perturbation size.
Figure 14-1 Form Containing the Simplex Method Constants

Optimizer 327
Objective Function Options

The list of objective functions available in GPS-X is given below:
Absolute Difference
m nj
F = ∑ ∑ zi , j − f i , j (14.1)
j =1 i =1
Relative Difference
m nj
z i, j − f i, j
F = ∑∑
j = 1 i =1 zi , j
(14.2)
Sum of Squares
F = ∑ ∑ ( zi , j − f i , j )
m nj
2
j = 1 i =1
(14.3)
Relative Sum of Squares
2
m  z − fi , j 
nj
F = ∑ ∑  i, j  (14.4)
 z
j =1 i =1 

i, j 
Maximum Likelihood
1 m  1
F = ∑ n j (ln (2π ) + 1) + n j ln
nj
(z − f i , j ) 
2 nj 
2 j =1   nj ∑ i, j
γ
f i , jj 
+ γ j ∑ ln f i , j 

(14.5)
  i =1  i =1
In the objective function expressions given above the following nomenclature is used:
zi,j is the measured value of response j in experiment i.
fi,j is the value of response variable j predicted by the process model in experiment i
γj is the heteroscedasticity parameter for response j
m is the number of measured response variables
nj is the number of experiments (i.e. observations) for response j
These objective function types are accessed by clicking on the inverted triangle beside the
Optimize icon and then selecting Type from the drop-down menu.

328 Optimizer
USING THE OPTIMIZER FOR PARAMETER ESTIMATION

In general, the maximum likelihood objective function should be used when
doing parameter estimation. This objective function calculates statistically
optimal parameter estimates based on assumptions on the nature of the
measurement errors. The sum of squares objective function is a special case of
the maximum likelihood objective function derived using further simplifying
assumptions and can also be used. It is equivalent to the maximum likelihood
objective function when there is only one response or target variable. Further
details on parameter estimation and the maximum likelihood and sum of
squares objective functions can be found in Appendix A of this chapter.
The other objective functions can be used for curve fitting when calculating
statistically optimal parameter estimates is not a concern.
USING THE OPTIMIZER FOR PROCESS OPTIMIZATION

In addition to data fitting applications, GPS-X can be used for process
optimization. For example, GPS-X can calculate the operating conditions for
your process model that optimize some measure of process performance, such
as operating cost or effluent quality.
To solve this type of problem in GPS-X you need to treat the problem as a data
fitting exercise. For example, if you want to minimize the value of a certain
model variable you need to specify an arbitrarily small target value for the
model variable in a .dat file and have the optimizer minimize the difference
between the calculated variable value and the target value using the absolute
difference objective function. This is equivalent to minimizing the model
variable directly. The target value should be made small enough so that the
optimizer cannot reach it.
You are not limited to using one performance measure. You can select a
number of different performance measures and have GPS-X optimize these
variables simultaneously by fitting them to user-supplied targets.
Termination Criteria
There are four different criteria used to terminate the optimizer:
1. Parameter tolerance: The maximum size along a parameter dimension is

defined as the difference between the largest value of this parameter from
among all of the simplex vertices, and the smallest value of this parameter
from among all of the simplex vertices. This maximum size is scaled by
dividing it by the difference between the upper and lower bounds for this
parameter. If the maximum sizes for all of the parameter dimensions are
less than the parameter tolerance, the optimization process is terminated.

Optimizer 329
2. Objective function tolerance: If the range (largest minus smallest) of objective

function values covered by the simplex vertices is less than the objective
function tolerance, the optimization process is terminated. Meeting this
criterion without satisfying criterion 1 may indicate that the objective
function is not very sensitive to some parameters.
3. Scaled termination value for objective function :
If the objective function value at
the current best point in the simplex is less than the user-specified final
objective function value, the optimization process is terminated. This final
value should be positive and small in magnitude. This criterion is not used
with the maximum likelihood objective function. It is only applicable for
the other objective functions because their values have a lower bound of
zero (a perfect fit).
4. Maximum number of optimizer iterations : The optimization process is
terminated if the maximum number of iterations is reached.
Satisfaction of any one of these four criteria will result in termination of the
iterative optimization process. These criteria provide a trade-off between the
length of the optimization run and the proximity to an optimal solution.
The specific values used for the termination criteria can be accessed from the
General Data menu. Right-click in an empty region of the drawing board to
display the menu and select System > Parameters > Optimizer to display the form

330 Optimizer
Figure 14-2 Optimizer Form Containing the Termination Criteria Settings
A termination criterion can be disabled by specifying a large negative value for

it. The objective function tolerance is disabled by default.
Types of Optimization
The optimizer module is equipped to handle three different types of process
measurements: time series measurements, long term operational data that are averages of
the original process measurements, and on-line measurements. Each type of measurement
set leads to a different type of optimization problem in GPS-X. These optimization types
can be accessed by clicking on the inverted triangle to the right of the Optimize and
selecting Type.
TIME SERIES OPTIMIZATION

This optimization type is the one normally used for both parameter estimation
and process optimization in GPS-X. It is designed to handle both time series
and steady-state measurements.

Optimizer 331
For this type of optimization, you enter your measured data into a text file with
a .dat extension. This text file should follow the naming and formatting
conventions discussed in the GPS-X User's Guide.
For parameter estimation involving a dynamic model, the data entered into the
text file will be a set of time series values for each of the response variables. In
GPS-X the response variables are referred to as target variables.
Steady-state optimization is a time series -type optimization with only one data
point for each target variable. The steady-state solver is used and the simulation
has a stop time of 0.0. This type of optimization is useful for calibrating the
model to data reported as daily, weekly or monthly averages. Data of this type
are typically obtained from composite samples and thus do not accurately
reflect the time dynamics of the real process. In a steady-state optimization, the
average data are used as the targets and selected model parameters are adjusted
to fit these targets.
When doing process optimization, you enter single target values for your
process performance measures at the desired points in time. As mentioned
earlier, you should also make sure to use the absolute difference objective
function.
GPS-X will fit your model to the measured data using the objective function
that you select. If you prepare output graphs to display the predicted values of
the model, GPS-X will automatically display the measured values provided in
the .dat file on the graphs.
GPS-X will draw a new curve for the predicted values at each optimization
iteration, in order to track the progress of the optimizer. At the end of the
optimization process, final predicted responses are displayed so that you can
visually assess the fit. An example of this type of graph is shown in Figure
14-3.

332 Optimizer
Figure 14-3 Example GPS-X Output Graph Showing Measured

Data (+ Markers) and the Predicted Response (Continuous Line)
PROBABILITY OPTIMIZATION
GPS-X also allows you to perform probability optimizations. This involves
fitting the cumulative probability of simulation results to the cumulative
probability of real data. The cumulative probability is the probability that
values X will have a value less than or equal to a specific value x. It is a
cumulative sum of all probabilities less than or equal to x.
Probability optimizations are designed primarily for analysis of long-term

operation. The data used in the optimization are time-averaged values and these
will be compared to time-averaged data generated in a simulation.
The data requirements for this type of optimization are substantial due to the
need to perform long-term simulations.
Minimizing the difference between cumulative probabilities for real data and
simulation results is achieved by reducing a special weighted error measure.
Both real data and simulation results are first ordered based on absolute
magnitude. Differences are taken between each pair of values in the ordered
lists. The differences are then grouped on the assumption that they are normally
distributed and the average difference for the group is weighted accordingly.
For example, the highest 10 percent of the differences are assumed to have a
probability of occurrence less than about 13 percent. The sum of these
weighted differences serves as the objective function for the optimization. The
net effect of the optimization is to achieve a close fit between cumulative
probability distributions for real data and simulation results.

Optimizer 333
The model parameter values resulting from this type of optimization may differ
significantly from those obtained from a time series optimization.
DYNAMIC PARAMETER ESTIMATION (DPE)

GPS-X also has a sophisticated dynamic parameter estimation procedure
(DPE). DPE is designed for the estimation of time-varying parameters. It can
be used with on-line data or on a set of off-line time series data. For details on
using on-line data, see the Advanced Control Module Manual.
The motivation behind DPE is that parameters in process models are often not
constant, but vary with time. For example the oxygen mass transfer coefficient
in an aerated tank is often slowly time-varying.
Dynamic parameter estimation is also useful for estimating parameters in

poorly understood processes. In these cases the model structure is likely to be
incorrect. As a result, the model may only be able to represent the data well
over short time intervals. In this case, using DPE will help compensate for the
model error and allow acceptable fitting of the measured data.
Another situation in which dynamic parameter estimation is useful is when you

are interested in detecting process changes and upsets. If for example a model
parameter is found to be relatively constant during normal process operation
but is sensitive to process changes, you can track this parameter using the DPE
feature and on-line data to help provide an early warning of process changes or
disturbances.
In GPS-X, dynamic parameter estimation is done by applying the time series

optimization approach mentioned earlier to a moving time window. Instead of
estimating parameters from an entire set of data, GPS-X calculates a set of
parameter estimates for each time window using the parameter estimates from
the previous time window as a starting guess. This approach can be used on a
data file that is continually updated with new blocks of data or on a static file
of time series data. You can use any of the objective functions that are
available for time series optimization when doing dynamic parameter
estimation.
The length of the time window controls how often the parameters are updated.
The shorter the time window, the more often the parameters are updated.
When using short time windows it may be necessary to filter the data to
eliminate noise so GPS-X does not fit the noise.
To ensure proper termination of the optimization routine when using the DPE
feature, it is suggested that the time window and the communication interval be
chosen such that the time window is an integer multiple of the communication
interval.

334 Optimizer
Summary of the Optimizer Settings and Parameters

This section discusses the optimizer form that is accessed by selecting General Data >
System > Parameters > Optimizer . The upper portion of this form is shown in Figure 14-2.
The lower portion of the form is shown below in Figure 14-4.
Figure 14-4 Bottom of the Optimizer Form
The termination criteria found on this form were discussed under Termination Criteria in
this chapter. The form accessed from the More... button in the Static sub-section contains
the simplex method constants. The remaining settings and parameters found in the
Optimizer form are described below. You can access the different sub-sections by scrolling
down the form.
STATIC SUB-SECTION
number of optimized parameters : This sets the number of variables to be adjusted
by the optimizer. It should correspond to the number of parameters specified as
Optimize variables in the Controls Setup window.
number of data points (at least 2):

This number sets an upper bound on the number
of rows that GPS-X will read in from the .dat file. The default value is large

Optimizer 335
so that GPS-X can handle the majority of data sets without having to change
this value.
detailed statistical report (ON - OFF):

If this option is set to ON and you are using
either the maximum likelihood or sum of squares objective functions, the
following statistics are provided in the solution report in addition to the
parameter estimates and objective function value: variance-covariance matrix,
correlation matrix, % variation explained by regression, significance of the
regression, lack of fit test, observed values, predicted values, % error between
predicted and observed values, residuals, weighted residuals, standardized
residuals, standardized residual plots, and the Portmanteau test on the weighted
residuals. The variance-covariance matrix and the correlation matrix are only
reported if the printing of confidence limits option is set to ON. The lack of fit test
is only reported if it is turned ON. The Portmanteau test is only reported if it is
turned ON and the maximum likelihood objective function is used. For more
information on the statistical tests consult Appendix B: The Optimizer Solution
Report in this chapter.
solution report to file (ON - OFF): If this option is set to ON, the statistical output is
appended to file stats.txt in the current directory.
DYNAMIC SUB-SECTION
DPE timewindow : This is the time window for dynamic parameter estimation.
MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD SUB-SECTION

(Normal/Cauchy): Selects the probability distribution of the
Error distribution
measurement errors used in the maximum likelihood objective function. The
Normal option should be used in most cases. The cauchy distribution looks
similar to the normal distribution but has heavier tails so that values far
removed from the mean have a higher probability than with they would with a
corresponding normal distribution.
(ON - OFF): Determines if the standard

Estimate standard deviations of errors
deviations should be estimated from the data using Equation (14.10), or if they
should be taken as specified.
Standard deviation of errors : Vector of standard deviations of errors associated

with each response variable (errors are assumed independent across variables
and observations). These values are not used in the estimation problem if
estimate standard deviations of errors is set to ON.
Use specified standard deviations as reference (ON - OFF):

Determines if the standard
deviation of errors should be used as reference values for the purpose of counting
the proportion of weighted residuals falling outside reference bounds at a given

336 Optimizer
level of significance. These reference bounds are calculated using the reference
standard deviations. In addition, if this option is ON a chi-square test is
performed on the sum of squares of the standard deviations of the weighted
residuals divided by the reference standard deviations. This option is set to OFF
by default. It does not affect the outcome of an optimization run.
Level of significance: This value is used for computing the reference bounds if
use specified standard deviations as reference is set to ON . This value cannot affect
the outcome of an optimization run.
Heteroscedasticity model (ON - OFF):

Determines if the variance model given in
Equation (14.8) is used. If this option is turned off the heteroscedasticity
parameters are set to zero.
Heteroscedasticity parameters : A vector containing the heteroscedasticity

parameter for each response variable. If heteroscedasticity model is set to OFF, all
heteroscedasticity parameters are ignored.
DERIVATIVE INFORMATION SUB-SECTION

( ON - OFF ): Controls the printing of
Report objective function gradient and Hessian
the gradient and the Hessian of the objective function at the solution. When this
option is ON, the gradient and Hessian are printed to the Log window and if
necessary to the stats.txt file. The gradient of the objective function is a
vector containing the derivatives of the objective function with respect to each
optimized parameter. The relative gradient is a scaled version of the gradient.
The Hessian is a matrix containing the second derivatives of the objective
function with respect to the optimized parameters. A Gauss-Newton Hessian
approximation is used. The Hessian is only reported when the maximum
likelihood or the sum of squares objective functions are used.
report model sensitivity coefficients (ON - OFF):

Controls the printing of the model
sensitivity coefficients at the solution. When this option is ON the sensitivity
coefficients are printed to the Log window and if necessary to the stats.txt
file. For each target variable, the model sensitivity coefficients are the
derivatives of the target variable with respect to each optimized parameter at
each data point. These derivatives are used in the calculation of the Hessian,
variance-covariance, and correlation matrices and the confidence limits.
finite-difference relative perturbation size:

The gradient vector elements and the
model sensitivity coefficients are calculated using a finite-difference formula,
specifically a forward-difference formula. The step size used in calculating the
derivatives is calculated by multiplying the finite-difference relative perturbation
size by the absolute value of the parameter of interest. Note that this setting
affects the calculation of the confidence limits.

Optimizer 337
CONFIDENCE LIMITS SUB-SECTION

printing of confidence limits (ON - OFF):
Controls the calculation and printing of
confidence limits for the parameter estimates. When this option is ON the
confidence limits are reported to the Log window and if requested to the
stats.txt file. When this option is OFF (default), the confidence limits are
not calculated or printed to the Log window or the stats.txt file.
Confidence limits are only reported when the maximum likelihood or the sum
of squares objective functions are used. This switch does not affect the
outcome of an optimization run.
confidence level for confidence limits :

The level of confidence used when
calculating the confidence limits. The default value of 0.95 corresponds to 95
percent confidence limits.
treat the different target variables as one target (ON - OFF): If there is more than one
target variable and the maximum likelihood objective function is used, this
switch controls whether the different targets are treated as the same target for
the purposes of calculating the degrees of freedom used in the Student’s t-
statistic in the confidence limits calculations. This feature is useful if you have
a number of different target variables that are actually the same variable
measured in different experiments.
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE REGRESSION SUB-SECTION

level of significance for significance of regression test :
This is the level of
significance used in the significance of the regression test. An appropriate
message is printed by GPS-X depending on the calculated probability value
and the level of significance. If the probability is larger than the chosen
significance level (default value is 0.05) it provides evidence that the
parameters are all zero and that the regression is not significant for the
corresponding target variable. If the probability value is smaller than the
significance level it indicates that the regression is significant for the
corresponding target variable and that the variation explained by the regression
is greater than expected by chance. This test is only reported when the
maximum likelihood or the sum of squares objective functions are used. It does
not affect the outcome of an optimization run.
LACK OF FIT SUB-SECTION

lack of fit test(ON - OFF): Controls the printing of the lack of fit test. If this
option is set to ON and the detailed statistical report is set to ON, the lack of fit test
is printed to the Log window and if necessary the stats.txt file. This test
determines whether the variance of the residuals is acceptable compared to the
user supplied estimate of the measurement variance or the measurement
variance calculated using replicate measurements. This test is only reported

338 Optimizer
when the maximum likelihood or the sum of squares objective functions are
used. It does not affect the outcome of an optimization run.
level of significance for lack of fit test:

This is the level of significance used in the
lack of fit test. An appropriate message is printed by GPS-X depending on the
calculated probability value and the level of significance. If the probability for
a certain target variable is smaller than the chosen significance level, it
indicates that there is a lack of fit associated with this target variable.
replication sum of squares ( User Supplied / Calculated ): This option allows the user
to specify whether the replication sums of squares used in the lack of fit test are
user supplied or calculated by GPS-X using repeat measurements.
relative tolerance used to detect repeat measurements :

This is the relative difference
used when detecting repeat measurements in the data set. The default value is
1.0E-4. Repeat measurements are inserted into GPS-X by placing
measurements very close together in time in the .dat file. GPS-X identifies
repeat measurements by checking the relative difference between all of the
times entered into the .dat file. If the relative difference between two time
values is less than the replication tolerance, the corresponding measurements
are considered to be repeats for the purposes of calculating the lack of fit test.
USER SUPPLIED REPLICATION SUM OF SQUARES SUB-

SECTION
This sub-section is accessed by clicking on the More... button in the Lack Of Fit
sub-section.
number of target variables : This is the number of target variables used in the
optimization. It is only used to size the replication sum of squares array and the
degrees of freedom for replication sum of squares array.
replication sum of squares :

This is an array for entering a replication sum of
squares for each target variable. This is useful if you do not have repeat
measurements but you have a good estimate of the measurement variance from
past experience.
degrees of freedom for replication sum of squares :

This is an array for entering the
degrees of freedom associated with each user supplied replication sum of
squares. If you do not have this information you can enter rough estimates.
Keep in mind that a large degrees of freedom value implies a high degree of
confidence in the variance estimate.

Optimizer 339
PORTMANTEAU SUB-SECTION
portmanteau test on weighted residuals (ON - OFF): This switch turns the
Portmanteau test on or off. The Portmanteau test is used to detect trends in the
weighted residuals. The Portmanteau test is designed for data taken in sequence
(e.g. time or space). If trends are present, the residuals are not independent.
This violates one of the assumptions of the maximum likelihood method and
indicates that the model does not account for all of the non-random variability
in the data. An appropriate message is printed depending upon the outcome of
the test. This test is only reported when the maximum likelihood objective
function is used. It does not affect the outcome of an optimization run.
maximum number of lags used in portmanteau statistic : By default, the Portmanteau

statistic involves autocorrelations at lags up to half the length of the time series.
This setting can be used to impose further restriction on the number of
autocorrelations taken into account. A large value effectively disables this
option. This setting does not affect the outcome of an optimization run.
Optimization Strategies
Before using the optimizer tool to estimate optimal parameter values or optimize
operating conditions, it is usually best to experiment with manual adjustment of the
optimization variables. By conducting interactive simulations you can observe the effects
of the model parameters on the response variables of interest. With this information you
will be able to make better judgements on appropriate variables to use in a parameter
estimation or optimization run.
For example, you can set up an interactive simulation with slider controls for the
parameters and then try adjusting these variables to try and achieve a visually acceptable
fit. You can plot actual data along with the target variables so that you can compare
simulation and actual data. This approach is useful for generating starting guesses for
parameter estimation and process optimization runs.

340 Optimizer
Appendix A: Maximum Likelihood Method
INTRODUCTION
In this appendix the maximum likelihood method is discussed in more detail.
First a general introduction on parameter estimation is given based on material
found in Bard (1974). This is followed by a detailed discussion of the
maximum likelihood method as implemented in GPS-X. Finally, a brief
description of the sum of squares objective function is given.
PARAMETER ESTIMATION
Parameter estimation is the procedure of fitting a mathematical model of a
process to measured data by calculating optimal estimates of the model
parameters. Parameter estimation differs from simple curve fitting in that the
criterion used to judge the best fit is not arbitrary but is based on statistical
considerations. In addition, the model structure is based on theoretical
principles and the model parameters often have physical significance. In curve
fitting, the choice of model structure is more arbitrary and is often chosen to
simplify the computations. The aim of parameter estimation is to not only fit a
model to data but to calculate parameter values that are good estimates of the
true values of the physical quantities.
Parameter estimation techniques can be applied to empirical models, but the

statistical properties of the estimates may not be as meaningful in a physical
sense. In addition, empirical models are not as well suited for extrapolation as
mechanistic models.
Parameter estimation is an important step in the development of mathematical

process models. Process models contain parameters with physical significance
that may vary significantly from plant to plant. To develop process models that
can be used for predictive purposes, it is important to estimate the unknown
process parameters using measured process data. Using literature values for the
unknown parameters will often result in a model that is not very useful for
predicting actual plant behavior.
MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD

GPS-X uses the maximum likelihood method for parameter estimation. In the
maximum likelihood method, the optimal parameter estimates are obtained by
maximizing the joint probability density function of the measurements. This
joint probability density function is a function of the parameters and is known
as the likelihood function. The form of the likelihood function depends on the
structure of the experimental error.

Optimizer 341
In GPS-X it is assumed that the experimental errors are normally distributed

random variables with a mean of zero. As a result, the likelihood function used
in GPS-X is:
  n
 1 n −1 
Lθ ,V1 ,V2 ,...,Vn  = 2π − ( nm ) / 2 ∏ V i exp − ∑ eiT V i ei 
−1 / 2
(14.6)
  i =1  2 i =1 
where
n is the number of experiments (i.e. observations)
m is the number of measured response variables
Vi is the variance-covariance matrix for the ith experiment
Vi  represents the determinant of Vi
ei is the m x 1 residual vector that contains the differences between the

measured values of the response variables and the values predicted by our
mathematical process model
_
θ is the vector of parameters to be estimated in our mathematical process
model
This expression is derived by substituting the residual vector, ei for the error
vector in the multivariate normal probability density function (pdf). The error
vector in the multivariate normal pdf contains the differences between the
measured values of the response variables (the variables that we are fitting) and
the true values. See Bard (1974) for details.
GPS-X also assumes that the measurement errors are independent from
observation to observation and from response variable to response variable.
This means that the variance-covariance matrices found in Equation (14.6) are
diagonal but not necessarily equal.
In GPS-X the log-likelihood function is used instead of the likelihood function

for mathematical convenience. Maximizing the log-likelihood function is the
same as maximizing the likelihood function. The log-likelihood function is
derived by taking the natural logarithm of Equation (14.6), as shown below:
− nm
InL =
2
1 n m
2 i =1 j =1
( )
1 n
In(2π ) − Σ Σ ln σ i2, j − Σ eiT Vi −1ei
2 i =1
(14.7)

342 Optimizer
where:
σ i2, j is the variance of response j in experiment i
In this derivation it is assumed that the variance of a response variable is not

constant across all the observations. To take this into account, GPS-X uses the
following expression for the estimated variance (Reilly et al., 1977):
γ
si2, j = ω 2j f i , jj (14.8)
where
si2, j is the estimate of the variance, σ i2, j
ωj is a proportionality constant that will be called the standard deviation of the

weighted residuals for response j
fi,j is the value of response variable j predicted by the process model in

experiment i
γj is the heteroscedasticity parameter for response j
This expression relates the variability of response variable j to the magnitude of

the predicted value for response j.
The heteroscedasticity parameter controls how the variance depends on the

predicted values. This parameter is bounded between 0 and 2 and is continuous
within this range. A value of 0 indicates constant absolute variability across all
of the observations for response variable j. A value of 2 indicates constant
relative variability across all of the observations for response variable j.
To determine the optimal value of ω j , given the other adjustable parameters in

the log-likelihood function, the estimated variance given by Equation (14.8) is
substituted into Equation (14.7). The resulting equation is then differentiated
with respect to ωj and the derivative is set to zero, leading to the following
expression:
1 n (z i , j − f i , j )
2
ω = ∑
2
j γ (14.9)
n i =1 f i, jj
where z i , j is the measured value of response j in experiment i.

Optimizer 343
Substituting this expression into Equation (14.8) yields the estimate for the
variance that accounts for nonhomogeneous measurement errors:
 1  γ n (z − f )
2
s =   f i . jj Σ i , j γ j i , j
2
i, j (14.10)
n i =1 fi. j
If Equation (14.10) is substituted into Equation (14.7) the log-likelihood
function becomes:
1 n m  1 n (z i , j − f i , j )  1 n m
2
lnL = −
nm
(ln(2π ) + 1) − Σ Σ ln Σ γ  2Σ
− Σ γ j , lnf i, j (14.11)
2 2 i =1 j =1  n i =1 f i , jj  i =1 j =1
To allow for the possibility that the number of observations is different for each
response variable, Equation (14.11) is re-written as (Steiner et al., 1990):
1 m  1 n j (z i , j − f i , j )2  nj 
( ( ) )   −γ
2Σ  nj Σ
π jΣ
lnL =  − n ln 2 + 1 − n ln lnf  (14.12)
j =1 
j j
f
γj  i, j

  i =1 i, j  i =1

This is the function that is maximized by GPS-X to fit process models to
measured data and obtain optimal parameter estimates. Equation (14.12) is a
measure of the probability that the measurements were generated by the
process model.
Note that you can set the heteroscedasticity factors or have GPS-X estimate
their optimal values for you.
As process models are generally nonlinear, the parameter values that maximize
Equation (14.12) cannot be determined analytically. An iterative optimization
method is required to maximize Equation (14.12). As mentioned earlier in this
chapter, GPS-X uses the Nelder and Mead simplex method (Press et al., 1986)
for optimization. This method is a type of direct search algorithm that does not
require the calculation of partial derivatives. This is helpful when estimating
parameters in systems of differential equations. The simplex method also has
the advantage that it can handle objective functions containing discontinuities.
This method is generally slower than derivative-based optimization methods,
but can handle a greater variety of objective functions and is often found to be
quite robust in finding solutions. The version of the simplex method
implemented in GPS-X allows for bounds to be placed on the parameters.
Due to the fact that the simplex method is designed for minimization, GPS-X
minimizes the negative of Equation (14.12) to determine the optimal parameter
estimates.

344 Optimizer
SUM OF SQUARES OBJECTIVE FUNCTION

When there is only one target variable and the variance is constant across all
observations (i.e. the heteroscedasticity parameter is zero), the sum of squares
objective function is equivalent to the maximum likelihood objective function.
For problems with more than one target variable, the sum of squares objective
function is a special case of the maximum likelihood objective function that
results if we make additional assumptions about the measurement errors. Our
maximum likelihood objective function, given by Equation 14.12, is derived
using the following assumptions:
 The measurement errors are normally distributed random variables

with a mean of zero.
 For each target variable, the measurement errors are independent

from observation to observation. Each target variable has its own
variance which varies from observation to observation according to a
power-law. The variances are unknown and are calculated as part of
the optimization process.
 There is no correlation between different target variables.
If we make the additional assumptions that all of the variances are equal (i.e.
all responses have same variance) and the variances do not change from
observation to observation (i.e. the heteroscedasticities are all zero) then the
maximum likelihood function reduces to the sum of squares objective function
in the multi-response case. The assumptions used to derive the sum of squares
objective function in the multi-response case do not apply in most practical
situations. Therefore, it is recommended that the maximum likelihood
objective function be used for calibration problems with more than one target
variable.

Optimizer 345
Appendix B: The Optimizer Solution Report
INTRODUCTION
In this appendix the solution report provided in the Log window after a GPS-X
optimization run is discussed. The solution report provides the user with the
solution found by the optimizer and a number of additional statistics that are
valuable when doing parameter estimation. This report also may be printed to
the stats.txt file. First we discuss the basic report and the detailed
statistical report. This is followed by a summary on using the statistical tests
and a discussion of overparameterization.
Note: In the solution report, the parameters are given generic names and are
numbered according to the order that the parameters are listed in the Control window
containing these parameters. For example, the parameter at the top of the Control
window is labeled Parameter 1.
Many of the statistics in the solution report are organized according to target
variable names. Generic target variable names are used and the names are numbered
according to the order given for the target variables in the target variables form that
is accessed by selecting Target Variables ... from the Optimize drop-down menu. For
example, statistics corresponding to the first target variable in the form are presented
under the heading Target 1.
BASIC REPORT
The basic solution report, which is printed to the Log window, includes the
number of iterations required by the optimizer, the initial and final values of
the objective function, the initial and final values of the parameters (i.e. the
optimization variables), the heteroscedasticity parameter values, and a
summary of the chosen optimizer settings. In addition, the statistics discussed
below are provided if requested in the Optimizer form.
Gradient of the Objective Function

The gradient vector of the objective function is defined as:
T
 ∂F ∂F ∂F 
∇F (θ ) =  , , ...,  (14.14)
 ∂θ 1 ∂θ 2 ∂θ p 
The variable F is the objective function. The variables θ1, θ2, …, θp are the
optimization variables. In the case of parameter estimation these variables are

346 Optimizer
the parameters being estimated. The vector θ contains the optimization

variables.
The partial derivatives are calculated numerically using the following forward-
difference formula:
∂F F (θ k + hk ) − F (θ k )
= (14.15)
∂θ k hk
where k = 1,, p and hk is the step or perturbation size. The step size is
calculated using the following formula:
hk = 10 −7 θ k (14.16)
In Equation (14.16) the value of 10-7 is referred to as the finite-difference relative

perturbation size in GPS-X and can be changed in the Derivative Information sub-
section of the Optimizer form.
The gradient provided in the solution report is calculated at the solution. If the
solution is a local minimum, the elements of the gradient vector should be
close to zero. Because poor scaling of the parameters and the objective
function can make the gradient appear large, the relative gradient is also
reported. The elements of the relative gradient are calculated by scaling the
gradient elements using the following equation:
θ k  ∂F 
RelGradk =   (14.17)
F  ∂θ k 
The infinity norm of the relative gradient vector is also reported. If the solution
is a local minimum, this norm should be close to zero.
The gradient is only reported when the report objective function gradient and
Hessian switch in the Derivative Information sub-section in the Optimizer form is set
to ON.
Model Sensitivity Coefficients

The model sensitivity coefficients express the local sensitivity of the process
model to infinitesimal changes in the optimization variables (subset of the
model parameters). They are the partial derivatives of the model with respect to
the optimization variables. A sensitivity coefficient can be calculated for each
target (i.e. response) variable with respect to each optimization variable at each
data point. The sensitivity coefficients are calculated using the forward-
difference approximation shown below:

Optimizer 347
∂f i , j f i , j (θ k + hk ) − f i , jθ k
= (14.18)
∂θ k hk
In this equation fi,j is the jth target variable at the ith data point. The step size is
calculated in the same way as for the gradient.
The sensitivity coefficients are only reported when the report model sensitivity
coefficients switch in the Derivative Information sub-section in the Optimizer form is
set to ON.
Hessian of the Objective Function

The Hessian is a matrix of second partial derivatives of the objective function
with respect to the optimization variables. For the case of two optimization
variables, the Hessian is defined as:
 ∂ 2F ∂ F 
2
 
 ∂θ 12 ∂θ 1 ∂θ 2 
H = (14.19)
 ∂ F ∂2 F 
2
 ∂θ ∂θ ∂θ 22 
 2 1
In GPS-X the elements of the Hessian are calculated using the Gauss-Newton
approximation. For the sum of squares objective function, each Hessian
element is defined as:
m n j  ∂f  ∂f 
∂2F
= 2 Σ Σ  i , j  i , j  (14.20)
∂θ k ∂θ l j =1 i =1  ∂θ k  ∂θ l 
where m is the number of target or response variables and nj is the number of

data points for target variable j. For the maximum likelihood objective
function, Equation 14.5, each Hessian element is defined as:
  γ (γ + 1)e 2 4γ e     γ j ei2, j 2ei , j  

 n j  j j γ + 2 i , j + γj +i1, j + 2γ    + γj  
∂2F 1 m j  
n  f i, j
J
f i , jj f i , jj  γ    γ j +1   ∂f  ∂f i , j  (14.21)
= ∑∑   − j  − n   f i, j f i, j   i , j  
∂θ k ∂θ l 2 j =1 i =1  nj
ell2, j f i ,2j 
j
 nj
ell2, j  ∂θ k  ∂θ l 
  ∑ γj   ∑ γj 
 ll =1 f ll , j 



ll =1 f ll , j 

where γj is the heteroscedasticity of the jth response variable. The variable ei,j is
the residual and is defined as:
ei , j = z i , j − f i , j (14.22)
The variable zi,j is the measured value of response j at the ith data point.

348 Optimizer
The expressions in Equation (14.20) and Equation (14.21) were derived

assuming that the response variables are equivalent to the state variables. Even
if this is not the case, this is not a limitation because the sensitivity coefficients
are being calculated using finite-differences. Therefore any dependencies in the
responses are being taken into account.
The Hessian matrices for the other objective functions are not calculated
because they cannot be approximated using the Gauss-Newton approximation.
As a result, they require the calculation of second order sensitivities.
If any of the optimization variables are at their bounds, the elements of the
Hessian involving these variables are zero.
The Hessian matrix is only reported when the report objective function gradient
and Hessian switch in the Derivative Information sub-section in the Optimizer form
is set to ON.
Confidence Limits
GPS-X calculates linear-approximation confidence limits for the parameter
estimates using the variance-covariance matrix. For the sum of squares
objective function, the variance-covariance matrix of the parameter estimates is
defined as (Bard, 1974):
Vθˆ = 2s 2 Hˆ −1 (14.23)
The matrix Ĥ is the inverse of the Gauss-Newton Hessian approximation to
-1
−1
the sum of squares objective function at the solution. The variable s 2 is the
variance estimate for the measurement errors and is defined as:
SS (θˆ)
s2 = (14.24)
n− p
()
where SS θˆ is the value of the sum of squares objective function at the
solution, n is the number of data points (total number considering all target
variables), and p is the number of parameters (i.e. optimization variables).
For the maximum likelihood objective function, the variance-covariance matrix

of the parameter estimates is defined as (Bard, 1974):
Vθˆ = Hˆ −1 (14.25)
The matrix Ĥ is the inverse of the Gauss-Newton Hessian approximation to
-1
the maximum likelihood objective function at the solution.

Optimizer 349
For both the sum of squares and the maximum likelihood objective functions,
the 100(1-α)% confidence limits for parameter k are:
θˆk = ±t (n − p; α / 2 )se(θˆk ) (14.26)
The variable t (n − p; α / 2 ) is the Student's t-statistic with n-p degrees of

freedom and a significance level of α / 2 . In this case, n is the number of data
points per response except for the sum of squares objective function where it is
the total number of data points. The variable α is the significance level for the
parameter estimates. It is defined by the following expression:
α = 1−δ (14.27)
where δ is the confidence coefficient. The confidence coefficient corresponds

to the confidence level for confidence limits parameter found in the Confidence
Limits sub-section of the Optimizer form. The default value is 0.95 so that by
default GPS-X reports 95 percent confidence limits.
The variable se(θˆk ) is the standard error of the kth parameter at the solution. It
is defined as the square root of the (k,k)th element of the variance-covariance
matrix as shown below:
se(θˆk ) = (Vθˆ ) k ,k (14.28)
The confidence limits are only reported when the printing of confidence limits
switch in the Confidence Limits sub-section in the Optimizer form is set to ON.
DETAILED STATISTICAL REPORT

The detailed statistical report provides additional information that is helpful
when doing parameter estimation. It allows the user to assess how well their
model fits the measured data. The detailed statistical report is activated by
setting the detailed statistical report option to ON in the Static sub-section of the
Optimizer form. The statistics included in the detailed statistical report are
discussed below.
Variance-Covariance and Correlation Matrices

The variance-covariance matrix is defined by Equation (14.23) for the sum of
squares objective function and by Equation (14.25) for the maximum
likelihood objective function. This matrix contains the variances of the
individual parameter estimates (diagonal elements) and the covariances

350 Optimizer
between the different parameter estimates (off-diagonal elements). Parameters

with large variances may be unnecessary.
The elements of the correlation matrix are calculated as follows:
(Vθˆ ) k ,l
(Cθˆ ) k ,l = (14.29)
(Vθˆ ) l ,l (Vθˆ ) k ,k
where (Vθˆ ) k ,l is the (k,l) element of the variance-covariance matrix.
By definition, the elements of the correlation matrix are always between zero
and one. Unless some parameters are on their bounds the diagonal elements are
always equal to one. The off-diagonal elements indicate the degree of
correlation between pairs of parameters. A large off-diagonal element indicates
a high degree of correlation between a pair of parameters. This provides
evidence that some of the parameters in the model are unnecessary and the
model is overparameterized. This may indicate that the model is not adequate
for the task at hand or that the data do not provide enough information to allow
estimation of all of the model parameters (Draper and Smith, 1981).
The variance-covariance and correlation matrices are only reported when the
printing of confidence limits switch in the Confidence Limits sub-section in the
Optimizer form is set to ON.
Percentage Variation Explained by Regression

This is a statistic often reported by linear least squares packages. In GPS-X it
has been modified to handle nonlinear maximum likelihood problems with
heteroscedasticity. The statistic, adapted from Steiner et al. (1990), is
calculated as follows for each target variable:
SS j
R 2j = 1 − (14.30)
SSmean j
It is multiplied by 100 to get a percentage. The variable SSj is the weighted
residual sum of squares for response j and is defined by:
nj
ei2, j
SS j = Σ
γ
(14.31)
f i , jj
i =1
The variable SSmeanj is the total weighted sum of squares corrected for the
mean and is defined below:
SSmean j = Σ
nj
(z i, j − zj)
2
(14.32)
γ
i =1 f i , jj

Optimizer 351
where z j is a weighted average of the measured values for response j and is

calculated as:
nj
zi, j
Σ
i =1
γ
f i , jj
zj = nj
(14.33)
1
Σ
i =1
γ
f i , jj
The overall variation explained is calculated as:
Σ SS
j =1
j
R =1−
2
m (14.34)
Σ SSmean j
j =1
The overall variation explained is multiplied by 100 to get a percentage.
The % variation explained is not a model adequacy test but is useful because it
shows how much of the variation in the data is accounted for by the fitted
model. This test is only reported when the maximum likelihood or sum of
squares objective functions are used.
Significance of Regression
This test involves testing the null hypothesis that all the model parameters are
zero against the alternative hypothesis that all the parameters are not zero.
The following sum of squares ratio is calculated for each response variable:
SSreg j
p −1
( F − value ) j =
SS j (14.35)
nj − p
where SSregj is the weighted regression sum of squares for target variable j and
is defined by:
SSreg j = SSmean j − SS j (14.36)
The sum of squares ratio follows an F-distribution if the errors in the

measurements are independent, normally distributed random variables and if
the model parameters are all zero.

352 Optimizer
GPS-X reports the F-value for each target variable and reports the probability
that it is from an F-distribution with p-1 and n j − p degrees of freedom. If the
probability is larger than the chosen significance level it provides evidence that
the parameters are all zero and the regression is not significant for the
corresponding target variable. The significance level is entered in the General
Data > System > Parameters > Optimizer form in the Significance Of The Regression
sub-section.
If the probability value is smaller than the significance level it indicates that the
F-value does not follow an F-distribution and therefore we accept the
alternative hypothesis that the model parameters are not all zero. In this case
the regression is significant for the corresponding target variable and the
variation explained by the regression is greater than expected by chance. For a
model to be useful for predictive purposes the F-values should be large and the
probability values should be close to zero.
GPS-X provides messages that summarize the results of the significance test.
The significance test is based on linear regression theory and is only
approximate for nonlinear models.
This test is only reported when the maximum likelihood or the sum of squares
objective functions are used.
Lack of Fit Test

This test determines whether the variance of the residuals is acceptable
compared to the user supplied estimate of the measurement variance or the
measurement variance calculated using replicate measurements. This serves as
a model adequacy test.
For each target variable, the following sum of squares ratio is calculated:
SSlof j
n j − p − repdof j
( F − value ) j = (14.37)
SSrep j
repdof j
The variable SSrepj is the weighted replication sum of squares for target
variable j and is calculated as:
SSrep j = Σ Σ
η nrν (z u ,v − zv )
2
(14.38)
γ
v =1 u =1 f v , jj
where η is the number of independent variable values for which there are
replicates, nrv is the number replicates for the vth value of the independent

Optimizer 353
variable, z v is the mean of the replicate measurements corresponding to the vth

value of the independent variable, zu,v is the uth replicate measurement
corresponding to the vth value of the independent variable, and fv,j is the
predicted value of response variable j corresponding to the vth value of the
independent variable.
The variable repdofj is the degrees of freedom for the weighted replication sum
of squares for target variable j. It is defined as:
η 
repdof j =  Σ nrv  − η (14.39)
 v =1 
As mentioned earlier, in this chapter, repeat measurements are inserted into
GPS-X by placing measurements very close together in time in the .dat file.
See the previous Lack of Fit sub-section, located in this chapter, for details.
The weighted lack of fit sum of squares for the jth target variable, SSlofj, is
calculated as:
SSlof j = SS j − SSrep j (14.40)
As mentioned in this chapter, the user also can provide the replication sum of
squares and the replication degrees of freedom in the Lack Of Fit sub-section of
the Optimizer form. In order for these values to be used by GPS-X, the replication
sum of squares option in the Lack Of Fit sub-section of the Optimizer form must be
set to User Supplied .
The sum of squares ratio or F-value follows an F-distribution if the errors in the
measurements are independent, normally distributed random variables and if
the weighted lack of fit sum of squares is not much larger than the weighted
replication sum of squares.
GPS-X reports the F-value for each target variable and reports the probability
that it is from an F-distribution with n j − p − repdof j and repdof j degrees
from freedom. If the probability for a certain target variable is smaller than the
chosen significance level, it indicates that there is a lack of fit associated with
this target variable. The significance level is entered in the General
Data>System>Parameters>Optimizer form in the Lack of Fit sub-section.
GPS-X provides messages that summarize the results of the lack of fit test. The
lack of fit test is based on linear regression theory and is only approximate for
nonlinear models.

354 Optimizer
objective functions are used and the lack of fit switch in the Lack Of Fit sub-
section in the Optimizer form is set to ON.
Observed and Predicted Values

The observed values are the measured target variable values provided in the
.dat file. The predicted values are the target variable values calculated by the
model that correspond to the observed values (i.e. they are calculated at the
same points in time).
% Error Between Predicted and Observed Values

The % errors are useful for detecting any large discrepancies between the
model and the measured data. The % error statistic is calculated as follows:
100(z i , j − f i , j )
%E i, j = (14.41)
z i, j
where %Ei,j is the percent error between z i , j and f i , j .
Residuals
As discussed earlier the residuals are defined as:
ei , j = z i , j − f i , j (14.42)
They are an estimate of the error in the measurements assuming that the model
is correct.
The weighted residuals and standardized residuals are only reported when the
maximum likelihood objective function is used. The weighted residuals are
defined as:
(z − f i, j )
(e )
i , j wt =
i, j
γ (14.43)
f i , jj
These are scaled residuals that are not as dependent on the magnitude of the
measurements and the predicted values as are the unscaled residuals.
The standardized residuals are defined as:
(e ) =
(z i, j − fi , j )
(14.44)
i , j std
si , j

Optimizer 355
The variable Si,j is the estimated variance of response j for the ith data point
and is defined in Equation (14.10).
The standardized residuals and their associated plots can be used to check
whether the residuals are independent and normally distributed. This
assumption is fundamental to the development of the maximum likelihood
objective function used in GPS-X. The standardized residuals are normalized
and should have a mean of zero and a variance of one if the residuals are
normally distributed.
To check for violation of the independence assumption, the standardized

residual plots should be examined for any noticeable trends. The presence of
trends provides evidence of serial correlation. Serial correlation occurs when
residuals taken in sequence are correlated with each other.
To check the assumption that the errors are normally distributed, the
standardized residual plots should be examined to see if the residuals are
randomly scattered about zero. In addition, the values of the standardized
residuals should be examined to check whether approximately 95 percent of the
residuals lie between +2 and -2.
The standardized residual plots are scaled to fit in the Log window. The largest
standardized residual for each response variable is represented by the
maximum number of " * " characters, which is seven. The remaining
standardized residuals for a response variable are scaled relative to this
maximum residual for the purposes of calculating how many " * " characters to
print. You should consult the actual values of the standardized residuals
provided in the Log window to determine whether the actual magnitudes of the
residuals for a response variable are large.
If the assumption that the residuals are independent and normally distributed is
violated it provides evidence that our model is inadequate to represent the
experimental data. If the process model structure is correct, it should account
for the non-random variability in the data.
The assumption that the residuals should be independent if the measurement

errors are independent is not strictly correct but is fine for practical purposes.
The residuals are always correlated to some extent as a result of the fact that
there are n measurements but only (n - p) degrees of freedom, where p is the
number of parameters to be estimated (Draper and Smith, 1981).
Portmanteau Statistic
The Portmanteau test is used to detect trends in the weighted residuals. If
trends are present, the residuals are not independent. This violates one of the

356 Optimizer
assumptions of the maximum likelihood method and indicates that the model
does not account for all of the non-random variability in the data. The
Portmanteau test is designed for data taken in sequence (e.g. time or space).
The Portmanteau statistic for response variable j is calculated as the number of

observations times the sum of the squared autocorrelations between the
weighted residuals up to a certain number of time lags (Brockwell and Davis,
1996):
Q j = n j Σ ( ρ j (k ))
τ
2
(14.45)
k =1
where nj is the number of data points for response j, τ is the number of time
lags, and ρj(k) is the sample autocorrelation among the weighted residuals up to
lag k for response j.
The sample autocorrelation is defined as:
Ω j (k )
ρ j (k ) = (14.46)
Ω j (0 )
where Ω j(k) is the sample autocovariance function between the weighted

residuals up to lag k for response j and is defined as:
Ω j (k ) =
1 nj − k (
 z
 i+ k , j − f i+ k , j ) (z − f i , j ) 
Σ
i, j
( )
  (14.47)
nj i =1 

γ
f i+ k , j j 

( f i, j )γ j 
The sample autocorrelations are approximately independent, normally
distributed random variables with mean zero and a variance of 1/nj if the
weighted residuals are independent and identically distributed (Brockwell and
Davis, 1996). This approximation gets better as the number of measurements
increases. Although the residuals themselves are not necessarily identically
distributed (they can have different variances), the weighted residuals should
be identically distributed because they are scaled.
If the sample autocorrelations for a response variable are independent and

normally distributed as mentioned above, then the variables n j ρ j (k ) should
nj
be independent and normally distributed with mean zero and variance one.
Due to the fact that the Portmanteau statistic is a sum of squares of these
variables, it is distributed as a chi-squared variable.

Optimizer 357
GPS-X reports the Portmanteau statistic for each target variable and reports the
probability that it is from a chi-squared distribution with τ degrees of freedom.
If the probability for a certain target variable is smaller than the chosen
significance level it provides evidence of a trend in this target variable's
weighted residuals. The significance level is entered in the General Data > System
> Parameters > Optimizer form in the Portmanteau sub-section.
GPS-X provides messages that summarize the results of the Portmanteau test.
objective functions are used and the portmanteau test on weighted residuals switch
in the Portmanteau sub-section in the Optimizer form is set to ON.
SUMMARY ON USING THE STATISTICAL TESTS

See Table 14-1 for a summary of how to use the statistics given in the solution
report to assess the adequacy of the fitted model. Keep in mind that many of
the tests become more reliable as the number of measurements increases. Even
if the tests indicate that the model is not adequate, it does not mean that you
cannot use the model. A visual inspection of the plots provided by GPS-X,
showing the measured values and the predicted values, may indicate that the
model captures the major trends in the data. This is often good enough for
practical purposes as it may only be important to model certain aspects of a
physical system.
OVERPARAMETERIZATION
Overparameterization occurs when there are more parameters in the process
model than necessary to fit the data. This situation leads to correlations
between model parameters as mentioned earlier in the context of the correlation
matrix. As a result the objective function near the solution to the parameter
estimation problem has elongated contours and the solution is not very
sensitive to changes in certain parameters.
The user should be careful when choosing the adjustable parameters in a

parameter estimation run. The model should be sensitive to these parameters. It
is often not practical to select all of the model parameters as optimization
variables because this slows the optimization process, and will likely result in
meaningless values for certain model parameters. It is preferable to choose
only those parameters that have the greatest affect on the mismatch between
the model and the data. See the Sensitivity Analysis chapter in the GPS-X
User's Guide for details on how to conduct a sensitivity analysis of your model
using GPS-X before doing a parameter estimation run.

358 Optimizer
Table 14-1 Summary of How to Use the Statistical Tests

Statistic How to Interpret
Confidence Limits If the confidence limits on a parameter include zero it indicates that
this parameter is not significant to the model.
Correlation Matrix Large off-diagonal elements (close to one) suggest that certain
parameters are correlated.
Significance of Probability values larger than the significance level indicate that the
Regression Test variation explained by the regression is less than expected by
chance.
Lack of Fit Test Probability values smaller than the significance level provide
evidence for a lack of fit in the fitted model.
Standardized The majority of standardized residuals should be between +2 and -
Residuals 2.
Standardized The residuals should be randomly scattered about zero without any
Residual Plots noticeable trends.
Portmanteau Probability values smaller than significance level suggest that the
Probability residuals are correlated.
Values
Appendix C: Nomenclature
α = significance level for the parameter estimates
C^ = correlation matrix at the solution
θ
δ = confidence coefficient
ei = m x 1 residual vector that contains the differences between the measured values of
the response variables and the values predicted by the mathematical process
model
ei , j = zi, j − f i, j
%Ei,j = % error between the measured and predicted values at point for response j in
experiment i
fi,j = value of response variable j predicted by the process model in experiment i
F (θ k ) = objective function evaluated at θk
∂F = the partial derivative of the objective function with respect to parameter θk
∂θ k
∂f i , j = partial derivative of respect to fi,j with respect to parameter θk
∂θ k
∂2F = second partial derivative of the objective function with respect to θk and θl
∂θ k ∂θ l
γj = the heteroscedasticity parameter for response j

hk = the step or perturbation size used in the forward-difference derivative formula for
the kth parameter
H = Hessian matrix of objective function

Optimizer 359
Ĥ = Hessian matrix of objective function at the solution

m = the number of measured response variables
nj = the number of experiments (i.e. observations) for response j
n = the number of experiments (i.e. observations) assuming all responses have the
same number of observations
nrv = number replicates for the vth value of the independent variable
η = number of independent variable values for which there are replicates
ωj = standard deviation of the weighted residuals for response j
Ω j (k ) = sample autocovariance function between the weighted residuals up to lag k for
response j
p = number of parameters being estimated
Qj = Portmanteau statistic for response j
ρ j (k ) = sample autocorrelation among the weighted residuals up to lag k for response j
R2 = % variation explained by regression expressed as a fraction (subscript used if

referring to a response variable)
RelGradk = relative gradient for parameter θ k
repdof = weighted replication sum of squares degrees of freedom (subscript used if
referring to a response variable)
σ i2, j = the variance of response j in experiment i
the estimate of the variance, σ i , j

si2, j = 2
se(θˆk ) = standard error of parameter θ k at the solution

SS = weighted residual sum of squares (subscript used if referring to a response
variable)
SSlof = weighted lack of fit sum of squares (subscript used if referring to a response
variable)
SSmean = total weighted sum of squares corrected for the mean
SSreg = weighted regression sum of squares (subscript used if referring to a response
variable)
SSrep = weighted replication sum of squares (subscript used if referring to a response
variable)
t(a,b) = student's t statistic with a degrees of freedom and a significance level of b
τ = number of time lags used in the Portmanteau statistic
θ = the vector of parameters to be estimated in the process model
θˆ = vector of estimated parameters at the solution
Vθˆ variance-covariance matrix at the solution
Vi = the variance-covariance matrix for the ith experiment
Vi = the determinant of V i
zi, j = the measured value of response j in experiment i
zν = mean of the replicate measurements corresponding to the vth value of the
independent variable
z u ,v = uth replicate measurement corresponding to the vth value of the independent
variable

360 Optimizer
Appendix D: References
Bard, Y. A., Nonlinear Parameter Estimation. Academic Press, New York (1974).
Brockwell, P. J. and Davis, R. A. Introduction to Time Series and Forecasting. Springer-

Verlag, New York (1996).
Draper, N. R., and Smith, H. Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, (1981).
Edgar, T. F. and Himmelblau, D. M. Optimization of Chemical Processes. McGraw-Hill,

(1988).
Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., and Vetterling, W. T. Numerical

Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge University Press, New York
(1986).
Reilly, P. M., Barjramovic, R., Blau, G. E., Branson, D. R., and Saverhoff, M. J.
Guidelines for the Optimal Design of Experiments to Estimate Parameters in First
Order Kinetic Models. Can. J. Chem. Eng., 55, 614 (1977).
Steiner, E. C., Rey, T. D., and McCroskey, P. S. SimuSolv Reference Guide. The Dow
Chemical Company, Midland, MI, Vol. 2 (1990).
(From MBR supplementary)
Chang, I.S., Lee, C.H., Ahn, K.H. (1999). Membrane Filtration Characteristics in
Membrane-Coupled Activated Sludge System: The Effect of Floc Structure on
Membrane Fouling. Separation Science and Technology, 34(9), pp.1743-1758.
Choi, S., Yoon, J., Haam, S., Jung, J., Kim, J., Kim, W. (2000). Modeling of the
Permeate Flux during Microfiltration of BSA-Adsorbed Microspheres in a Stirred
Cell. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 228, pp. 270-278.
Garcia, G.E., Kanj, J. (2002). Two Years of Membrane Bioreactor Plant Operation
Experience at the Vejas Tribe Reservation. Proceedings of the Water Environment
Federation’s 75th Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference, September 28th –
October 2, Chicago, Illinois.
Günder, B. (2001).The Membrane-Coupled Activated Sludge Process in Municipal

Wastewater Treatment. Technomic Publishing Company, Lancaster, PA, USA.
Merlo, R.P., Adham, S., Gagliardo, P., Trussell, R.S., Trussell, R. (2000). Application of
Membrane Bioreactor Technology for Water Reclamation. Proceedings of the Water
Environment Federation’s 73rd Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference,
October 14 - 18, Anaheim, CA.

Optimizer 361
Shin, H-S., Lee, W-T., Kang, S-T. (2002). Formation of Dynamic Membrane in
Submerged Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs). Proceedings of the Water Environment
Federation’s 75th Annual Technical Exhibition and Conference, September 28th –
October 2, Chicago, Illinois.
Wallis-Lage, C., Steichen, M., deBarbadillo, C., Hemken, B. (2005). Shopping for an
MBR – What’s for sale? Water Environment & Technology, 17(1), pp. 31-35.

Miscellaneous 363
CHAPTER 15
Miscellaneous
Real Time Clock

This feature allows the user to set the speed of the simulation to real time or to a multiple
of real time. This is useful in on-line SCADA applications or for operator training in
which GPS-X acts as a virtual plant.
The parameters for this feature can be accessed at the bottom of the General Data > System >
Parameters > Simulation Set up form (Figure 15-1). The Real Time Synchronized Mode
parameter will switch the real time clock ON or OFF. When the real time clock is ON, the
simulation speed is equal to a multiple of real time. The multiplication factor used is
specified by the Real Time Accelerator Factor . For example, setting the accelerator factor to
24 causes one simulation day to take one real hour. Note that the real time clock feature
forces the Communication interval to be equal to one second.

364 Miscellaneous
Figure 15-1 Real Time Clock Parameters
Steady-State Solver
The steady-state solver used in GPS-X is a robust routine based on a direct search
algorithm (that is, no gradients are used). Sometimes, the steady-state convergence
appears slow or diverges due to a problem in the way that the model is set up. For
example, if the underflow rate from a settler is too low, that settler will begin to fill up
with solids. Since the concentration ranges of solids in the ten layers become large, the
changes in these layers between loops of the steady-state solver also become large which
may cause slow convergence or divergence.
In all cases of poor convergence, the user should closely examine all the unit processes
for proper specification. The easiest way to do this is to examine the dsum# variable
associated with each unit process where # represents the overflow stream label. You can
do this by issuing the display command in the Command line of the Simulation Control
window. The sum of the individual dsum values equals the dsum value displayed in the
Log window. Having done that, there are a number of parameters associated with the
steady-state solver that can be fine-tuned (See Figure 15-2 and Figure 15-3).

Miscellaneous 365
Figure 15-2 Steady-State Parameters
Figure 15-3 More Steady-State Parameters
The forms shown in Figure 15-2 and Figure 15-3 are accessed by selecting General Data >
System > Parameters > Steady-State.
The parameters in these forms are described below.
The first menu item, number of retries on iteration indicates the number of times the steady-
state solver will try to reach convergence if it fails.
The error limit on individual variables is a tolerance below which the steady-state ignores a
variable. If the steady-state solver is making changes to a state variable that become
smaller than this tolerance, the solver will ignore the variable, assuming it is at steady-
state.

366 Miscellaneous
When the solver achieves a sum of state variable derivatives below the iteration termination
criteria, a steady-state convergence is triggered. The default value is 10.0, but in some
systems it may need to be increased when in single precision.
The contract constant and expand constant refer to the step size made by the steady-state
solver between iterations. A larger step is taken if an improvement is found, while a
smaller step is taken if no improvement is found. The performance of the steady-state
solver can be greatly affected by these parameters. The expansion factor is limited to the
maximum step size in one iteration . This maximum step size is dampened as the steady-state
solution is reached. The damping factor on final approach will control the damping effect. A
zero value means no damping, while a value of 1.0 means that the maximum step size is
limited to one tenth of the maximum step size.
The initial step size that the steady-state solver takes is governed by the initial perturbation
parameter. This number is normally set smaller than the maximum step size to prevent a
poor initial guess by the solver.
The next four items shown in these forms deal with other termination criteria and output
control. The status of the solver is printed at a frequency controlled by the convergence
output interval , while the steady-state loop counter initial value specifies which iteration loop
will be first printed to the simulation Log window. The maximum number of iterations limits
the steady-state solver to attempting only this many iterations. The loop counter is reset
after each retry. Another steady-state termination criteria is the maximum number of
unsuccessful iterations which will cause the steady-state solver to terminate if
improvements in the value of the sum of the derivatives is not made within this number
of loops.
The trim parameters shown here refer to the output of the ACSL trim function. This is an
alternative steady-state solver, which uses the Jacobian matrix for accelerated searches.
However, this gradient type routine was not found to be very robust with the large models
encountered within GPS-X.
Numerical Control
The numerical issues discussed in this chapter are important because the success of a
simulation depends on the input data and the models and on the numerical solver used to
do the calculations.
Any modeller using dynamic simulation should have an understanding of the underlying
numerical methods used to solve the equations to properly interpret the results.
Understanding the numerical methods used will help to identify problems that are
numerical in nature.
The choice of which numerical solver to use is important. There are several numerical
integration methods available in GPS-X. The numerical solver can be set in the Simulation

Miscellaneous 367
Control window or can be saved into a scenario or the layout by setting it in General Data >
(Figure 15-4).
System > Input Parameters > Integration Control
Generally the default integration method, Runge-Kutta-Felberg(2), works very well for
most models; however, there are situations where the solver may need to be changed. In
general the trade-off is between numerical accuracy and simulation speed. The fixed step
algorithms (i.e. Euler, Runge-Kutta(1), and Runge-Kutta(2)) are faster than the variable
step algorithms (i.e. Adams-Moulton, Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg(1), Runge-Kutta-
Fehlberg(2), Gear's Stiff, and Differential Algebraic Solver) but are not as accurate.
If the system is stiff then you may need to use the Gear's Stiff algorithm. A stiff system is
one in which there are processes occurring at very different time scales (e.g., a very fast
process such as the transfer of oxygen into a tank and a very slow reaction occurring at
the same time).
Figure 15-4 Integration Methods
In addition to the numerical solvers, the user can change some of the numerical
parameters that control the simulations. Changing the default parameters however
requires extreme caution because in some cases it may introduce errors in the results. The
numerical parameters are accessed by making the following selections: General Data >
System > Parameters > Numerical . The form is shown in Figure 15-5.

368 Miscellaneous
Figure 15-5 Numerical Parameters Form
These parameters include bounds on flow, state variables, state derivatives, parameters,
exponentials, and volumes. The parameters for the implicit solver (IMPL - used for
solving implicit functions evaluated as residuals, where the residuals are reduced to zero)
used in the exact code option can be set here. Some of the parameters are discussed in
more detail in the sub-sections below.
IGNORE DILUTION PARAMETERS

If the liquid volume in a tank falls below the ignore dilution rate below this volume
parameter value, then the dilution rate (defined as the inverse of the hydraulic
residence time) will not be used to calculate the concentrations in the tank as
would normally be done. In doing so, the speed of simulation is greatly
increased. The same principle is applied to the settlers and SBRs where the
dilution rate in a particular layer is ignored if the height of the layer is smaller
than the ignore dilution rate below this layer thickness parameter value.

Miscellaneous 369
PROTECTION AGAINST DIVISION BY ZERO

The parameter protect against division by zero is fixed and cannot be changed
by the user. This parameter is used in all calculations involving division. It is
used to ensure that the denominator in an expression is never equal to zero. For
example, the DO switching function, used in many rate equations (shown
below), includes the protection against division by zero parameter.
DO
F=
DO + KOH + padbyz
SPEED SUB-SECTION
The parameters in the Speed sub-section of the Numerical form concern the
pump flow rates used in all the objects. Since the switching of pumps on and
off introduces sharp changes in the flows, the numerical integration routine
may require a very small step size to reduce the numerical error. In some cases,
these small step sizes will result in a very slow simulation. If the smooth pump
discharge at discontinuities logical is turned ON (default is OFF), then the pumped
flow rate is ramped up to the specified amount as follows:
1
Q=  par 
− par •t − 
1+ e  2 
where
Q = pumped flow rate (m 3/d),

par = smoothing factor,
t = smoothing period (d).
The smoothing function will only be applied to a user-specified percentage

change (smooth at flow changes larger than ). This allows the user the flexibility of
smoothing only larger changes in a pump flow rate. The smoothing function
will be applied to all pump flows in a layout including underflows, control
splitters, etc. See Figure 15-6 for an illustration of how the smoothing function
affects the pumped flow.

370 Miscellaneous
Figure 15-6 Smoothing Function
Large Models
Although GPS-X allows the user to build very large and complex layouts, there are some
restrictions. First, the simulation language used, ACSL, currently has a limit on the
number of discrete blocks of code that can be specified. What this means to the user is
that the number of automatic controllers for a given layout cannot exceed 25. Since a
number of objects have built-in controllers (e.g., settler has a controller for both the
pumped flow and underflow), the user can quickly use all the allowable discrete code
blocks. To circumvent this problem, the user can select either the Big option, which
combines all the automatic controller code into one discrete block, or the Big+ option,
which disables all controllers. In selecting the Big option, the user can no longer specify
the sampling time for each individual controller loop. One sampling interval will override
the rest. This sampling interval (controller sampling time) is found under General Data >
System > Parameters > Miscellaneous .
Integration Considerations
ROBUST VS. FAST MODELS

A trade-off exists between the speed of the simulation and the robustness and
accuracy of the model under different conditions (e.g. sudden flow
discontinuities or tanks emptying completely). GPS-X is configured such that
the average user with a typical continuous flow activated sludge plant need not
worry about the accuracy and the speed of the simulation. However, when
dealing with more complex processes it may be necessary for the user to switch
to a different integration algorithm or change the values of some numerical
parameters to improve the accuracy or speed of the simulation. In general,
robustness and accuracy are more important than simulation speed.
If you suspect that the simulation results are not accurate, you should first
check that the physical dimensions of the process objects and the values of the
process flows are reasonable. A numerical value may have been entered
incorrectly.

Miscellaneous 371
If you are confident that the model parameters are reasonable then the next step
is to determine whether a modelling simplification or numerical problem is
leading to inaccurate results. Some helpful information is listed below:
• If you suspect that the simulation results are not accurate, you may wish to
try the Exact code option. (Build > Code menu item). The Quick option
(default) results in a faster simulation but is not as accurate when recycle
flows are present. When the Quick option is used the recycle flows at each
time step are simply the values taken from the previous time step. When the
Exact option is used the recycle flows are calculated exactly using an
implicit nonlinear equation solver. In most situations using the Quick option
is acceptable, because the integration time steps are small and recycle flows
usually don't change dramatically. In an application with a number of
recycle flows and sudden extreme dynamic changes this simplification may
cause some problems.
• The choice of integration algorithm (IALG) can have a significant effect

on the output of the model. For a detailed description of the available
integration algorithms consult the ACSL Reference Manual (contact
Hydromantis for details). Generally, only variable step algorithms (i.e.
Adams-Moulton, Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg(1), Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg(2),
Gear's Stiff, and Differential Algebraic Solver) are acceptable for the
simulation of highly dynamic systems. Try the Gear's Stiff algorithm if
you suspect that your system is stiff (unless you are simulating an SBR or
trickling filter, in which case only the Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg algorithms
are allowed).
The Gear's Stiff routine is a self-tuning algorithm that adapts itself to
rapidly changing derivatives - in some cases though it might require
excessive simulation time to cross a discontinuity in the model. The
Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg(1) algorithm is exactly the opposite - it is very
forgiving for discontinuities, but experiences difficulties with steeper
problems. A good compromise between these two solvers is the Adams-
Moulton algorithm. It is very robust and does not give up easily but it is
slower. The Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg(2) algorithm is almost identical to
Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg(1), but is more robust.
• It is possible to monitor the step sizes used by the integration algorithm
during a run. You can either print the values to the Log window by
entering the following command at the command line in the Simulation
Control window: output truecssitg or place the variable truecssitg
on an output graph. You can select truecssitg for display in the General
Data > System > Display Variables > General program variables form (it is labeled
as Average integration step size). The average integration step size
(truecssitg) is calculated over each communication interval. Start your
simulation using a small communication interval (~0.01 or less). Sharp

372 Miscellaneous
drops in truecssitg usually signal a discontinuity. Using the above method,

the Sum of absolute values of the derivatives (dsum ) can also be checked for
sharp changes.
• If your simulation is slow you can find which variable makes the
simulation slow by selecting the Fullinfo option in the Options>Set
up>Information menu of the Simulation Control window, and running the
simulation using either the dams-Moulton or Gear’s Stiff integration
algorithms. The error summary displayed at the end of the run in the Log
window will point to the variable that controls the step size.
• The integration of systems with low DO (dissolved oxygen)
concentrations (in the range of a few dozen micrograms) is time
consuming because the integration algorithm has to cut back on the step
size or risk running into negative DO values.
• Sometimes the integration algorithms have difficulty at the start of a
simulation. In such cases the initial concentrations of the state variables
may be inappropriate, resulting in large initial derivative values. In this
case the variable step integration algorithms keep cutting back on the step
size to go over this initial bump. It may be helpful to use the steady-state
solver to determine the initial conditions.
• Simulation speed depends strongly on the values of the derivatives of the
state variables. You can reduce the absolute value of the lower and upper
bounds on the derivatives to speed up the simulation of discontinuities by
eliminating sharp peaks. These bounds can be found in the General Data >
System > Parameters > Numerical form. The best values to use depend on the
system in question. Try plotting the DO derivative (found in the Process
Data menu for each object), because this is the most sensitive state variable
in most cases. Get the maximum value during the run and then select the
bounds to be 50 percent of the highest value. Changing the bounds from
the default values (-1.e33 and 1.e33) can restrict the accuracy of the
integration.
• Sudden start-up or switching off of pumps (influent, or other) can cause
discontinuities in the derivatives, and as a consequence, a delay in the
processing of the simulation. To prevent this, a smooth pump option is
provided in the General Data > System > Parameters > Numerical form, which
starts and stops pumps smoothly. This is strictly intended as a numerical
feature and does not try to simulate real pump discharges during transient
periods. By default, the smoothing is not used. If you experience problems
when pumps are turned off or on, try using smoothing.
• Check the Log window for any messages printed during the run.

GPSX - Techref 01

Uploaded by

Document Informationclick to expand document informationHydromantis

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Copyright:

Available Formats

GPSX - Techref 01

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

GPSX - Techref 01

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GPS-X Technical Reference

GPS-X Version 6.2

ACSL is a registered trademark of AEgis Research Corporation

Adobe and Acrobat are trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated

MATLAB is a registered trademark of The MathWorks, Inc.

JAVA is a trademark of Oracle Corporation.

PRINTING DATE: November 2012

Special Activated Sludge Units .......................................................................................................................................... 153

CHAPTER 12 ..................................................................................................... 291

Figure 4-1 - Diagram Nomenclature .......................................................................................................................................... 36

Figure 10-7 Effluent Parameters ........................................................................................................................................ 259

Table 3-1 - Carbon – Nitrogen Library (CNLIB) State Variables ............................................................................................. 26

Introduction to Modelling and Simulation

These terms are discussed next.

1. Variables generated by the environment that influence the behaviour of the

GPS-X Technical Reference

Accordingly, a system is a potential source of data in that inputs can be defined

Experimentation is probably the single most important concept of a system for

To perform an experiment implies the application of a set of external

Why is modelling important?

GPS-X Technical Reference

Why is simulation important?

1. Perform an experiment on the real system and extract data to gather

GPS-X Technical Reference

The process of dynamic modelling of facilities involves the solution of

BENEFITS OF COMPUTER MODELLING

Why COD is Important to Know

With regard to the organic substances, a commonly measurable parameter is the

GPS-X Technical Reference

• Comprehensive model (Mantis2)

Consequently, a general calibration/verification approach to GPS-X must be broadly

OVERVIEW OF DATA REQUIREMENTS

GPS-X Technical Reference

Data requirements fall in one of the following categories:

1. Physical plant data, including: process flow sheet (flow lines,

PHYSICAL PLANT DATA

GPS-X Technical Reference

OPERATIONAL PLANT DATA

Activated Sludge Response Variables

It is important to be able to perform a solids mass balance around the system.

Primary and Final Effluent Response Variables

GPS-X Technical Reference

INFLUENT WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS

BIOLOGICAL REACTOR AND FINAL SETTLER

GPS-X Technical Reference

Settling Characteristics (Primary and Secondary)

A short summary of the proposed experimental procedures is given below for

Minimum solids attainable. In general, this parameter for final settlers is

Alternatively, settling velocity model parameters can be estimated using a

A TYPICAL CALIBRATION EVENT

GPS-X Technical Reference

GPS-X Technical Reference

1. The hydraulic configuration;

5. Stream labels; and

GPS-X Technical Reference

GPS-X Technical Reference

Qin = influent flow rate (m3/d)

SCOMP = 1sa + ksbsb + 0xa + 0xb = sa + ksb*sb