Pressed

See
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313025167
The fallacy of interpreting SSDS with different

types of breccias as seismites amid the
multifarious origins of earthquakes:
Implications
Article · January 2017

DOI: 10.1016/j.jop.2016.09.001
CITATIONS READS
5 3,091
1 author:
G. Shanmugam
Consultant
151 PUBLICATIONS 3,865 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
SSDS and earthquakes View project
All content following this page was uploaded by G. Shanmugam on 28 January 2017.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Journal of Palaeogeography, 2017, 6(1): 12e44 (00111)
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
journal homepage: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-palaeogeography/
Multi-origin of soft-sediment deformation structures and seismites
The fallacy of interpreting SSDS with

different types of breccias as seismites amid
the multifarious origins of earthquakes:
Implications
G. Shanmugam
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX
76019, USA
Abstract At present, there are no criteria to distinguish soft-sediment deformation structures (SSDS)
formed by earthquakes from SSDS formed by the other 20 triggering mechanisms (see a companion paper in
Vol. 5, No. 4 of this journal by Shanmugam, 2016). Even if one believes that earthquakes are the true
triggering mechanism of SSDS in a given case, the story is still incomplete. This is because earthquakes
(seismic shocks) are induced by a variety of causes: 1) global tectonics and associated faults (i.e., mid-
ocean ridges, trenches, and transform faults); 2) meteorite-impact events; 3) volcanic eruptions; 4)
post-glacial uplift; 5) tsunami impact; 6) cyclonic impact; 7) landslides (mass-transport deposits); 8) tidal
activity; 9) sea-level rise; 10) erosion; and 11) fluid pumping. These different causes are important for
developing SSDS.
Breccias are an important group of SSDS. Although there are many types of breccias classified on the basis of
their origin, five types are discussed here (fault, volcanic, meteorite impact, sedimentary-depositional,
sedimentary-collapse). Although different breccia types may resemble each other, distinguishing one type
(e.g., meteorite breccias) from the other types (e.g., fault, volcanic, and sedimentary breccias) has important
implications. 1) Meteorite breccias are characterized by shock features (e.g., planar deformation features in
mineral grains, planar fractures, high-pressure polymorphs, shock melts, etc.), whereas sedimentary-
depositional breccias (e.g., debrites) do not. 2) Meteorite breccias imply a confined sediment distribution
in the vicinity of craters, whereas sedimentary-depositional breccias imply an unconfined sediment distribu-
tion, variable sediment transport, and variable sediment provenance. 3) Meteorite, volcanic, and fault
breccias are invariably subjected to diagenesis and hydrothermal mineralization with altered reservoir quality,
whereas sedimentary-depositional breccias exhibit primary (unaltered) reservoir quality. And finally, 4)
sedimentary-collapse breccias are associated with economic mineralization (e.g., uranium ore), whereas
sedimentary-depositional breccias are associated with petroleum reservoirs. Based on this important group of
SSDS with breccias, the current practice of interpreting all SSDS as “seismites” is inappropriate. Ending this
practice is necessary for enhancing conceptual clarity and for advancing this research domain.
E-mail address: shanshanmugam@aol.com.

Peer review under responsibility of China University of Petroleum (Beijing).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jop.2016.09.001
2095-3836/© 2016 China University of Petroleum (Beijing). Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Petroleum
(Beijing). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
The fallacy of interpreting SSDS with different types of breccias 13
Keywords Breccias, Earthquakes, Faults, Global tectonics, Meteorite impacts, Seismites, Soft-sediment
deformation structures (SSDS)
© 2016 China University of Petroleum (Beijing). Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China
University of Petroleum (Beijing). This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Received 29 July 2016; accepted 7 September 2016; available online 15 November 2016
3) Volcanic eruptions (Moran et al., 2008).

1. Introduction 4) Post-glacial uplift (Fjeldskaar et al., 2000).
5) Tsunami impact (Tappin et al., 2001).
This article is a companion to my earlier paper 6) Cyclonic impact (Meng et al., 2013).
“The seismite problem” (Shanmugam, 2016). The 7) Landslides (Mass-transport deposits) (Pankow
purpose of the original paper was to explain that there et al., 2014).
are no objective criteria to recognize earthquakes as a 8) Tidal activity (Barruol et al., 2013).
unique triggering mechanism (among 20 others) of 9) Sea-level rise (Brothers et al., 2013).
soft-sediment deformation structures (SSDS) (Fig. 1). 10) Erosion (Steer et al., 2014).
Even if one recognizes earthquakes as the mechanism 11) Fluid pumping (Zhang et al., 2013).
that contributed to the origin of SSDS, the geological
story is still incomplete. This is because earthquakes Given these alternatives, simply naming a deposit
are generated by a multitude of causes. Selected ex- as “seismites” without identifying the root cause of
amples are: seismic shock responsible for the deformation is
incomplete in understanding the geological origin of
1) Global tectonics (Kearey et al., 2009; Ruff, 1996). SSDS. An analogy in the field of clinical diagnosis
2) Meteorite-impact events (Collins et al., 2005). would be like a doctor of medicine diagnosing a
Fig. 1 Selected types of triggers, state of liquefaction, and soft-sediment deformation structures (SSDS). There are 21 triggers and they are
all directly or indirectly responsible for sediment transport, deposition, and liquefaction. In reflecting published literature, earthquakes and
tectonic activity are listed as two different types. However, earthquakes and volcanism are an integral component of global tectonics (Kearey
et al., 2009). Note that both tectonic and non-tectonic triggers go through liquefaction in developing SSDS. Also note that earthquake is one
of many triggers that can develop SSDS. SSDS are not seismites. Thin blue arrows: One or more sediment transport processes with or without
flow transformations (Fisher, 1983). Thick gray arrow: Final deposition. See Shanmugam (2006a, 2006b, 2008a, 2008b, 2012a, 2013b, 2015,
2016) for discussion of examples of triggers shown here (Basilone et al., 2014, Beck, 2009, Boulton et al.,2001, Gradmann et al., 2012,
Malkawi and Alawneh, 2000, Obermeier et al., 2002, Scholz et al., 2011, Shanmugam, 2012b, Shanmugam, 2013a, Shanmugam et al.,
1988, Simms, 2003). Figure from Shanmugam (2016).
14 G. Shanmugam
patient with stomach pain as “stomach disease”,

without pinpointing the root cause as “gastric can-
2. Earthquakes and faults
cer”. Similarly, an in-depth understanding of the
origin of earthquakes is vital. Therefore, the primary The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS, 2016) defines
purpose of this paper is to provide a catalogue of that “Earthquake is a term used to describe both sud-
natural and anthropogenic phenomena responsible for den slip on a fault, and the resulting ground shaking
causing earthquakes. An equally important objective and radiated seismic energy caused by the slip, or by
is to explain the academic and economic implications volcanic or magmatic activity, or other sudden stress
of recognizing the specific origin of breccias associ- changes in the Earth”. The term seismicity refers to the
ated with SSDS. In accomplishing these two goals, I frequency, intensity, and distribution of earthquakes in
relied mostly on empirical data on earthquakes, a given area. Although both terms are used synony-
meteorite impacts, and volcanoes gathered by the mously, seismicity has a time component.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the National Aero- The occurrence of earthquakes can be explained by
nautics and Space Administration (NASA), the National the elastic rebound theory (Fig. 2A), which was
Geophysical Data Center/World Data Service (NGDC/ developed after the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake
WDS), and the Smithsonian Institution. All data used in (Reid, 1910). Fig. 2B illustrates the distribution of
this article are already available in the public domain. compressional and dilational P wave first motions
Relevant references on seismite research, totalling about an earthquake. According to Kearey et al.
268, have been included in the companion paper (2009), the velocity equation for P and S waves is
(Shanmugam, 2016). that the P velocity is about 1.7 times greater than the S
Fig. 2 A − Elastic rebound mechanism showing earthquake (fault) generation (elastic rebound theory). (a) A block of rock traversed by a pre-
existing fracture (or fault) is being strained in such a way as eventually to cause relative motion along the plane of the fault. AB horizontal
line = Marker indicating the state of strain of the system. Broken vertical line = Location of the fault. (b) Relatively small amounts of strain can
be accommodated by the rock. (c) When the strain reaches the level at which it exceeds the frictional and cementing forces opposing
movement along the fault plane. (d) Finally, fault movement occurs instantaneously. Figure from Kearey et al. (2009); B − Distribution of
compressional and dilational P wave first motions about an earthquake. Figure from Kearey et al. (2009); C − Three types of basic faults along
which earthquakes are generated. Credit: USGS; colored version from Wikipedia.
velocity in the same medium. Consequently, for an tenet of global tectonics is that all aspects of tectonic
identical travel path, P waves arrive before S waves. activity involve faulting and related earthquakes. A
Fig. 2C shows the three basic types of faults along digital tectonic activity map of the Earth shows the
which earthquakes are generated. Faults represent occurrence of various types of faults along plate
the main mechanical discontinuities within the elas- boundaries (Fig. 3). Empirical data also show that
ticebrittle Earth's upper crust. They accommodate epicenters of earthquakes (Fig. 4) and volcanoes are
tectonic deformation by slipping, mostly during preferentially associated with plate boundaries. Both
earthquakes (Scholz, 1990). Sibson (1977) explained divergent and convergent plate boundaries are sites of
the physical factors that affect the genesis of the frequent earthquakes.
various fault rocks in terms of frictional properties, In explaining the theory of plate tectonics, Isacks
temperature, effective stress normal to the fault and et al. (1968) divided the lithosphere into three inter-
differential stress. He explained their relations to the locking blocks or pates. Their boundaries are (Fig. 3):
energy budget of fault zones, the main velocity modes
of faulting, and the three types of faulting, which 1) Transform faults (Fig. 3).
include strike-slip, normal, and thrust (Fig. 2C). Allen 2) Ocean ridges (Fig. 4).
(1975) discussed practical difficulties of delineating 3) Trenches (Fig. 5).
thrust faults in the field after an earthquake.
All three types are associated with faults and
earthquakes. For example, the National Geophysical
3. Multiple origins of earthquakes Data Center/World Data Service (NGDC/WDS , 2016)
has compiled information on destructive earthquakes
from 2150 B.C. to the present that have Magnitude 7.5
3.1. Global tectonics
or greater. The mid-oceanic ridges (MOR) are one of
the longest active seismic belts where most of the
Earthquakes are an integral component of global
earthquake epicenters are located continuously within
tectonics (Kearey et al., 2009). The underpinning
Fig. 3 A digital tectonic activity map of the Earth showing tectonism and volcanism during the past one million years. Note the distribution
of different types of faults (see Legend on the lower right corner of the map). Also note that earthquakes and volcanism are an integral
component of global tectonics. Credit: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771. Figure from Lowman et al. (1999).
16 G. Shanmugam
Fig. 4 Map showing locations of epicenters (358,214 events during 1963e1998) along plate boundaries. Credit: NASA, DTAM project team
(http://denali.gsfc.nasa.gov/dtam/seismic/).
Fig. 5 Cross-section of a subduction zone (trench) showing locations of seismicity (shaded areas). All plotted seismicity locations have had at
least one large earthquake (M > 7.5). Figure from Ruff (1996).
a narrow axial zone (Rundquist and Sobolev, 2002). 2) 1906 San Francisco earthquake: April 18, 1906.
According to Goslin et al. (2005), the seismicity of the Magnitude: 7.8 Mw (ASCE, 1907).
northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge was recorded by two hy- 3) 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake: October 17, 1989.
drophone networks moored in the sound fixing and Magnitude: 6.9 Mw (Stover and Coffman, 1993).
ranging (SOFAR) channel, on the flanks of the Mid-
Atlantic Ridge, north and south of the Azores. During In addition, earthquakes are known to occur away
a period of operation (05/2002e09/2003), the north- from plate boundaries, such as in Central Australia
ern ‘SIRENA’ network, deployed between latitudes (Fig. 7). Consequently, earthquakes are omnipresent.
40 200 N and 50 300 N, recorded acoustic signals gener-
ated by 809 earthquakes on the hotspot-influenced 3.2. Meteorite-impact events
Reykjanes Ridge. Tryggvason (1973) documented that
the seismicity of the Iceland region is concentrated The role of meteorite impact on sedimentation is a
along the crest of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and in two taboo topic, particularly in petroleum exploration
shear zones connecting the two ends of the eastern (Shanmugam, 2012a). But meteorite impacts have
volcanic zone in Iceland to the ridge crest on both sides been well documented worldwide (Fig. 8). The top ten
of Iceland (Fig. 6). meteorite-impact structures in the world are listed in
Ruff (1996, p. 91) states that “Subduction zones Table 1. In North America, meteorite impacts of
generate most of the world's seismicity, and all of the various ages have been documented (Fig. 9). The ki-
largest earthquakes”. A cross-section of a subduction netic energy calculated for impactors varying from 4 m
zone illustrates the close link between seismicity and to 1000 m in diameter is given in Table 2. The 1908
subduction (Fig. 5). Perhaps, the best known transform “Tunguska event” in Siberia is considered to be the
fault is the San Andreas Fault, which extends roughly largest impact event on Earth in recorded history. Early
1300 km through California (USA) and even northern estimates of the energy of the air burst range from 10
Mexico. It forms the tectonic boundary between the to 15 megatons of TNT (Shoemaker, 1983). Schulte
Pacific Plate and the North American Plate, and its et al. (2010) reviewed the geological significance of
motion is right-lateral strike-slip. Examples of three the third largest Chicxulub asteroid impact at the K−Pg
earthquakes associated with this fault system are: boundary on the northern Yucatan, Mexico (Fig. 9).
This K−Pg event generated major mass movements not
1) 1857 Fort Tejon earthquake: January 9, 1857. only directly by the impact-induced seismic shock
Magnitude: 7.9 Mw (Stover and Coffman, 1993). (Bralower et al., 1998; Busby et al., 2002; Day and
Fig. 6 A − Distribution of volcanoes along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge in the Iceland region. Credit: USGS; B − Distribution of earthquakes along
the Mid-Atlantic Ridge in the Iceland region. Figure from Tryggvason (1973). Note that earthquakes and volcanism are an integral component
of global tectonics.
18 G. Shanmugam
Fig. 7 World seismicity map. Earthquakes represented are (1) M5.51, 1900e2002, (2) M3.51, 1990e2008, US lower 48 and Hawaii, and (3)
M4.51, 1990e2009, Alaska. Credit: USGS (http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world/seismicity/). Accessed November 18, 2010.
Figure from Shanmugam (2012a), with permission from Elsevier. Copyright Clearance Center's RightsLink: Licensee: G. Shanmugam. License
Number: 3943960750294. License Date: September 7, 2016.
Maslin, 2005; Norris and Firth, 2002), but also by the eruption and the subsequent 2004 eruption have been
impact-triggered tsunamis (Claeys et al., 2002; well documented by the U.S. Geological Survey (Moran
Shanmugam, 2012a; Smit et al., 1996). The kinetic et al., 2008; Tilling et al., 1990).
energy derived by the impact is estimated at Seismicity data, for example, were collected
~5 × 1030 erg, which is equivalent to 108 Mt of TNT or a from numerous stations located in the Mount St.
Richter-magnitude 13 earthquake (Covey et al., 1994). Helens seismic network when swarm began on
Therefore, seismic shocks associated with impacts are September 23, 2004 (Fig. 11). Empirical data show
indeed formidable. Indeed, the great magnitude of that nearly every volcanic eruption is preceded by an
extraterrestrial collisions were capable of causing increase in seismicity (i.e., by an earthquake swarm)
widespread extinctions worldwide (Becker, 2002). (Waite et al., 2008). The origins of volcanic earth-
quake swarms are discussed by Roman and Cashman
3.3. Volcanic activity (2006). Iceland is a region of not only volcanoes but
also earthquake swarms along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge
Volcanic earthquakes are the direct result of the (Fig. 6).
movement of magma (Lahr et al., 1994). Volcanoes are
a major cause of earthquakes along modern (Fig. 10) 3.4. Glacial activity
and ancient continental margins. The Smithsonian
Institution map reveals the importance of volcanoes Fjeldskaar et al. (2000) discussed the importance
worldwide along plate boundaries and some conti- of postglacial uplift, neotectonics, and related seis-
nental margins (Fig. 10). The 1980 Mount St. Helens micity in Fennoscandia (Fig. 12).
Fig. 8 Frequency of small asteroids roughly 1e20 m in diameter impacting Earth's atmosphere. Credit: NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
California Institute of Technology (http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2014-397). Accessed July 19, 2016.
Table 1 Top ten impact structures in the world that include the Chicxulub (see Fig. 9) in Yucatan, Mexico. Data from PASSC (Planetary and
Space Science Centre), University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada (http://www.passc.net/EarthImpactDatabase/
NorthAmerica.html). Accessed April 5, 2011.
Rank Diameter Crater name Location Latitude Longitude Age (Ma)
km (mi)
1 300 (186) Vredefort South Africa S 27 000 E 27 300 2023 ± 4
2 250 (155) Sudbury Ontario, Canada N 46 360 W 81 110 1850 ± 3
3 170 (106) Chicxulub (Fig. 9) Yucatan, Mexico N 21 200 W 89 300 64.98 ± 0.05
4 100 (62) Popigai Russia N 71 390 E 111 110 35.7 ± 0.2
5 100 (62) Manicouagan Quebec, Canada N 51 230 W 68 420 214 ± 1
6 90 (56) Chesapeake Bay Virginia, U.S.A. N 37 170 W 76 010 35.5 ± 0.3
7 90 (56) Acraman South Australia S 32 010 E 135 270 ~590
8 80 (50) Puchezh-Katunki Russia N 56 580 E 43 430 167 ± 3
9 70 (43) Morokweng South Africa S 26 280 E 23 320 145.0 ± 0.8
10 65 (40) Kara Russia N 69 060 E 64 090 70.3 ± 2.2
km = kilometer, mi = mile; 1 km = 0.621 mi.
West et al. (2010) presented evidence for glacial 3.5. Tsunami impact
seismicity in Alaska (Fig. 13). They presented a
framework for interpreting small glacier seismic Tsunamis are oceanographic phenomena that
events based on data collected near the center of represent a water wave or series of waves, with long
Bering Glacier, Alaska, in the spring 2007. They wavelengths and long periods, caused by an impulsive
found that extremely high microseismicity rates (as vertical displacement of the body of water by earth-
many as tens of events per minute) occurred largely quakes, landslides, volcanic explosions or extrater-
within a few kilometers of the receivers. A high- restrial (meteorite) impacts. Earthquakes commonly
frequency class of seismicity was distinguished by generate tsunamis through the transfer of the large-
dominant frequencies of 20e35 Hz and by impulsive scale elastic deformation associated with ruptures to
arrivals.
20 G. Shanmugam
Fig. 9 Map showing sites of meteorite impacts in North America, including the Chicxulub (K−Pg) in the Yucatan Peninsula. Credit: PASSC
(Planetary and Space Science Centre), University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada (http://www.passc.net/
EarthImpactDatabase/NorthAmerica.html). Accessed April 5, 2011. Figure from Shanmugam (2012a), with permission from Elsevier. Copy-
right Clearance Center's RightsLink: Licensee: G. Shanmugam. License Number: 3943960750294. License Date: September 7, 2016.
potential energy within the water column (Geist, hit the north coast of Papua New Guinea. Tappin et al.
2005). Aspects of tsunamis are discussed by (2001) attributed this tsunami to submarine slumps.
Shanmugam (2008b). Tsunamis generated submarine slumps, which in turn
On July 17, 1998, a magnitude 7.0 earthquake triggered tsunamis. The importance here is that large-
generated a series of catastrophic tsunami waves that scale mass movements are closely associated with
Table 2 d Properties of impact events with varying diameters of impactors (stony asteroids). From Marcus et al. (2010). See also Collins
et al. (2005). All based on density of 2600 kg/m3, speed of 17 km/s, and an impact angle of 45 . URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Impact_event. Accessed July 25, 2016.
Impactor Kinetic energy at atmospheric entry Kinetic energy at airburst Airburst altitude Average frequency (years)
diameter
4 m (13 ft) 3 kt 0.75 kt 42.5 km (139,000 ft) 1.3
7 m (23 ft) 16 kt 5 kt 36.3 km (119,000 ft) 4.6
10 m (33 ft) 47 kt 19 kt 31.9 km (105,000 ft) 10
15 m (49 ft) 159 kt 82 kt 26.4 km (87,000 ft) 27
20 m (66 ft) 376 kt 230 kt 22.4 km (73,000 ft) 60
30 m (98 ft) 1.3 Mt 930 kt 16.5 km (54,000 ft) 185
50 m (160 ft) 5.9 Mt 5.2 Mt 8.7 km (29,000 ft) 764
70 m (230 ft) 16 Mt 15.2 Mt 3.6 km (12,000 ft) 1900
85 m (279 ft) 29 Mt 28 Mt 0.58 km (1900 ft) 3300
100 m (330 ft) 47 Mt 3.8 Mt 1.2 km (0.75 mi) 5200
130 m (430 ft) 103 Mt 31.4 Mt 2 km (1.2 mi) 11,000
150 m (490 ft) 159 Mt 71.5 Mt 2.4 km (1.5 mi) 16,000
200 m (660 ft) 376 Mt 261 Mt 3 km (1.9 mi) 36,000
250 m (820 ft) 734 Mt 598 Mt 3.8 km (2.4 mi) 59,000
300 m (980 ft) 1270 Mt 1110 Mt 4.6 km (2.9 mi) 73,000
400 m (1300 ft) 3010 Mt 2800 Mt 6 km (3.7 mi) 100,000
700 m (2300 ft) 16,100 Mt 15,700 Mt 10 km (6.2 mi) 190,000
1000 m (3300 ft) 47,000 Mt 46,300 Mt 13.6 km (8.5 mi) 440,000
km = kilometer, m = meter, mi = mile, ft = foot; 1 km = 0.621 mi; 1 ft = 0.3048 m.
Fig. 10 Map showing volcanoes of the world. Large red triangles show volcanoes with known or inferred Holocene eruptions; small red
triangles mark volcanoes with possible, but uncertain Holocene eruptions or Pleistocene volcanoes with major thermal activity. Data on
Global Volcanism: 1968e2002 (Venzke et al., 2002). Credit: Smithsonian Institution, Global Volcanism Program (http://www.volcano.si.edu/
world/find_regions.cfm). Accessed November 18, 2010. Figure from Shanmugam (2012a), with permission from Elsevier. Copyright Clearance
Center's RightsLink: Licensee: G. Shanmugam. License Number: 3943960750294. License Date: September 7, 2016.
22 G. Shanmugam
Fig. 11 A − Photograph showing Mount St. Helens lava dome. Originally published as the cover photo of the U.S. Geological Survey Pro-
fessional Paper 1750 (Moran et al., 2008); B − Location of stations in Mount St. Helens seismic network. Black triangles correspond to Pacific
Northwest Seismic Network (PNSN) stations in place when swarm began on September 23, 2004; and red triangles correspond to stations
installed after eruption began. Inset map shows crater stations superimposed on digital elevation model from April 19, 2005. Most crater
stations were added after start of 2004 eruption. Many newly added stations operated for short periods; at most, six crater stations were
operational at any one time.
seismicity (Pankow et al., 2014; Parsons et al., 2014; in seismicity: The atmosphere pressure drop unloaded
Tappin et al., 2014). As noted earlier, the Chicxulub the surface, which brought the reverse faults closer to
asteroid impact at the K−Pg boundary on northern failure.
Yucatan, Mexico (Fig. 9) had generated not only major
mass movements directly by the impact-induced 3.7. Landslides (mass-transport deposits)
seismic shock (Bralower et al., 1998; Busby et al.,
2002; Day and Maslin, 2005; Norris and Firth, 2002), Landslides represent mass-transport deposits
but also by the impact-triggered tsunamis (Claeys (MTD) (Shanmugam, 2015). Although it is well docu-
et al., 2002; Smit et al., 1996). mented that earthquakes invariably cause faulting and
related MTD, MTD can also trigger earthquakes. One of
3.6. Cyclonic impact the best documented case studies is by Pankow et al.
(2014) in Utah (Fig. 14). Pankow et al. (2014) sum-
Tropical cyclones are meteorological phenomena. marized the results as follows:
Structurally, tropical cyclones are large, rotating sys-
tems of clouds, winds, and thunderstorms. In the “On the evening of 10 April 2013, a massive land-
Northern Hemisphere the rotation is counterclock- slide occurred at the Bingham Canyon copper mine
wise, but in the Southern Hemisphere the rotation is near Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. The northeastern
clockwise due to the Coriolis force. The destructive wall of the 970-m-deep pit collapsed in two distinct
power of cyclones was discussed by Shanmugam episodes that were each sudden, lasting ~90 s, but
(2008b). Meng et al. (2013) reported that a statisti- separated in time by ~1.5 h. In total, ~65 million
cally significant increase of seismicity rate was found cubic meters of material was deposited, making the
when Hurricane Irene (August 2011) passed by the cumulative event likely the largest non-volcanic
epicentral region, located in Louisa County, Virginia, landslide to have occurred in North America in
where an Mw 5.8 earthquake struck in 2011. Meng et al. modern times. Fortunately, there were no fatalities
(2013) offered a possible explanation for the increase or injuries. Because of extensive geotechnical
Fig. 12 Earthquakes in Fennoscandia during different periods of observation. Figure from Fjeldskaar et al. (2000), with permission from
Pergamon Press (Elsevier). Copyright Clearance Center's RightsLink: Licensee: G. Shanmugam. License Number: 3943820304821. License
Date: September 7, 2016.
surveillance, mine operators were aware of the that is visible throughout the network (6e400 km).
instability and had previously evacuated the area. Local magnitudes (ML) for the two slides, which are
The Bingham Canyon mine is located within a dense based on the amplitudes of short-period waves,
regional network of seismometers and infrasound were estimated at 2.5 and 2.4, while magnitudes
sensors, making the 10 April landslide one of the based on the duration of seismic energy (Md) were
best recorded in history. Seismograms show a much larger (>3.5). This magnitude discrepancy,
complex mixture of short- and long-period energy and in particular the relative enhancement of long-
24 G. Shanmugam
Fig. 13 Left: Map of lower Bering Glacier experiment overlain on Landsat imagery. Triangles mark locations of seismic stations. Right:
Seismic event classes from Bering Glacier and Augustine Volcano. A − Sample waveforms from Bering Glacier. Dominant frequencies are shown
along left side; B − Sample waveforms from Augustine Volcano; C − Distribution of dominant frequencies at Bering Glacier; D − Distribution of
dominant frequencies at Augustine Volcano. Figure from West et al. (2010).
period energy, is characteristic of landslide seismic summarized that “Turnagain Arm is a semidiurnal
sources. Interestingly, in the six days following the hypertidal estuary in southeastern Alaska with a
landslide, 16 additional seismic events were recorded tidal range of 9 m. Contorted bedding and
detected and located in the mine area. Seismo- flow rolls preserved in tidal sediments within the
grams for these events have impulsive arrival estuary have previously been interpreted as resulting
characteristics of tectonic earthquakes. Hence, it from the Mw 9.2 Great Alaskan Earthquake of 1964.
appears that in this case the common geological Horizons of flow rolls between undeformed beds in
sequence of events was inverted: Instead of a large sediments and rock strata have been used to infer
earthquake triggering landslides, it was a landslide ancient earthquakes in other areas. Although many
that triggered several small earthquakes”. Details types of soft-sediment deformation structures can be
are illustrated in Fig. 14. formed by earthquakes, observations of sedimenta-
tion on tidal flats in the inner parts of Turnagain Arm
in the summers of 2003 and 2004 show that a wide
3.8. Tidal activity range of soft-sediment deformation structures,
similar to those inferred to have been formed by
Barruol et al. (2013) through deployment of a earthquakes, can form in macrotidal estuaries in the
seismic network along the Ade lie and George V coasts absence of seismic shock. During sedimentation rate
in East Antarctica during the period 2009e2012 pro- measurements in 2004, soft sediment deformation
vided the opportunity to monitor cryoseismic activity structures were recorded that formed during one
and to obtain new insights on the relationship between day's tide, either in response to overpressurization of
tidal cycles and coastal glacier dynamics. They re- tidal flats during rapid tidal drawdown or by shear
ported numerous icequakes (50,000 events within 10 stress exerted on the bed by the passage of a 1.8 m
months; and can be up to 100 events/hour) and a clear tidal bore. Structures consisted of flow rolls, dish
tidal modulation. Barruol et al. (2013) suggested that structures, flames, and small dewatering pipes in a
they result from ice friction and fracturing around the bed 17 cm thick. In the future, if the flow rolls in
rocky peak and from the glacier flexure in response to Turnagain Arm were found in isolated outcrops across
the falling and rising tides at its grounding area. an area 11 km in length, in an estuary known to have
Tidal forces themselves are powerful enough to been influenced by large-magnitude earthquakes,
cause SSDS. For example, in a convincing case study would they be interpreted as seismites? These ex-
advocating an alternative tidal origin to seismic amples show that caution is needed when using ho-
origin of SSDS, Greb and Archer (2007, p. 435) rizons of flow rolls to infer paleoseismicity in
Fig. 14 Landslide-triggered earthquakes in Utah on April 11, 2013. A − Index map of the United States showing the state of Utah; Credit:
Wikipedia; B − University of Utah seismic and infrasound network, and location of the Bingham Canyon mine; C − Photograph of the 11 April
2013 rock avalanche (copyright Kennecott Utah Copper, used with permission). Elevation of the crest and toe of the slide are shown, as well as
an estimate of the runout distance along the arcuate travel path. A group of large haul trucks damaged by the slide can be seen at lower left;
D − Seismic and acoustic waveforms recorded at NOQ (13 km from slide), the closest broadband seismic station. Seismic traces are vertical
component-velocity in different frequency bands (broadband, high-passed at 1 Hz, low-passed at 0.1 Hz); acoustic traces are infrasonic beams
steered toward the mine in a pass band of 0.5e5.0 Hz. Gray-shaded boxes indicate time period with coherent signal originating from the
mine. Amplitude scales are consistent for each pass band (i.e., they are consistent across each row). B, C, and D from Pankow et al. (2014).
Credit for B, C, and D: GSA.
estuarine deposits because many of the mechanisms 3.9. Sea-level rise

(tidal flux, tidal bores, slumping, flooding) that can
cause deformation in rapidly deposited, unconsoli- Brothers et al. (2013, p. 979) investigated the
dated silts and sands, are orders of magnitude more causal relationships between rapid sea-level rise,
common than great earthquakes”. Other studies also flexural stress loading, and increased seismicity rates
attributed the origin of SSDS to tidal processes along passive margins (Fig. 15). They found that
(Tessier and Terwindt, 1994). Coulomb failure stress across fault systems of passive
26 G. Shanmugam
Fig. 15 Conceptual models for flexural loading of continental margin following rapid eustatic sea-level rise. A − Margin configuration prior to
sea-level rise; B − Configuration following rapid sea-level rise. Added loading of water on shelf induces flexural bending stresses on underlying
elastic plate (red arrows represent compression; blue arrows represent tension). Figure from Brothers et al. (2013).
continental margins may have increased more than

1 MPa during rapid late Pleistoceneeearly Holocene
sea-level rise, an amount sufficient to trigger fault
reactivation and rupture. These results suggest that
sea-levelemodulated seismicity may have contributed
to a number of poorly understood but widely observed
phenomena. These phenomena include 1) increased
frequency of large-scale submarine landslides during
rapid, late Pleistocene sea-level rise; 2) emplacement
of coarse-grained mass-transport deposits on deep-sea
fans during the early stages of marine transgression;
and 3) the unroofing and release of methane gas
sequestered in continental slope sediments.
3.10. Erosion
Conventionally, deep tectonic processes over a

seismic cycle are considered as the only persistent Fig. 16 Mechanism of Coulomb stress loading of a thrust fault by
mechanism driving the stress loading of active faults. surface erosion. Distribution of stress increment Ds (here purely
However, Steer et al. (2014) showed via a mechanical illustrative) induced by a punctual erosion at the surface, increasing
both the tangential Dt (driving effect) and the normal stresses Dsn
model (Fig. 16) that at the timescale of a seismic
(unclamping effect). Figure from Steer et al. (2014).
cycle, erosion also significantly influences the stress
loading of thrust faults. The authors have shown that
erosion rates of about ~0.1e20 mm/year, as docu- injection of fluid either into a basal sedimentary
mented in Taiwan, China, can raise the Coulomb stress reservoir with no underlying confining unit or directly
by ~0.1e10 bar on nearby thrust faults over the inter- into the underlying crystalline basement complex. The
seismic phase. Such stresses are probably sufficient to authors speculated that the earthquakes probably
trigger shallow seismicity or promote rupture of deep occurred along faults that were likely critically
continental earthquakes up to the surface. stressed within the crystalline basement. These faults
were located at a considerable distance (up to 10 km)
3.11. Fluid pumping from the injection wells.
Another example is the Three Gorges Project in
Zhang et al. (2013) presented a case study in which China where earthquakes are generated by the reser-
earthquakes were induced by fluid pumping. In this voir (Yao et al., 2013). Although human-induced
study, a series of Mb 3.8e5.5 induced seismic events in earthquakes are included here for completeness, they
the midcontinent region, United States, resulted from are irrelevant for interpreting ancient rock record.
Helwig, 1970; Kirkland and Anderson, 1970; Logan,

4. Origins of breccias and their 1863; Maltman, 1984, 1994). Obermeier et al.
implications (2005) discussed the importance of liquefaction-
induced SSDS created by earthquakes. Such SSDS
4.1. Types of breccias include angular clasts or breccias (Fig. 17). Although
seismic shear waves are considered to be the com-
Breccias are broken angular fragments of minerals mon cause of liquefaction and related deformation
and rocks that comprise an important kind of SSDS. There (Greene et al., 1994), Holzer and Youd (2007) re-
are many types of breccias based on their genesis, which ported that excess pore-water pressure and lique-
include 1) frictional wear in fault zones (Sibson, 1986), 2) faction at the Wildlife Liquefaction Array (California)
sediment transport and deposition (Shanmugam, 2012a), in 1987 were caused by deformation associated with
3) sediment loading (Shanmugam, 2016), 4) sediment both high-frequency strong ground motion and 5.5-s-
collapse due to dissolution (Friedman, 1997), 5) volca- period Love waves. However, not all breccias are
nic/pyroclastic activity (Fisher, 1984), 6) meteorite formed by earthquakes (e.g., sedimentary breccia
impact (Bischoff et al., 2006), and 7) hydrothermal ac- deposited by debris flows; breccias caused by
brak, 1997). In this review, five important types
tivity (Je solution-collapse, etc.). Importantly, not all earth-
(fault, volcanic, meteorite impact, sedimentary- quakes are formed by a single cause (e.g., tectonic
depositional, and sedimentary-collapse) are considered. versus meteorite-impact events). The following dis-
The origin of SSDS has been a challenge ever since cussion and case studies illustrate the challenges and
they were recognized (Allen, 1984; Collinson, 1994; implications associated with interpreting five types
Fig. 17 Schematic section showing the occurrence of seismic-liquefaction induced SSDS. This scenario is applicable to both subaerial and
submarine environments that are subjected to seismic shaking. Note angular mud clasts or breccias in sand injections. Originally from
Obermeier et al. (2005). Figure from Shanmugam (2012a), with permission from Elsevier. Copyright Clearance Center's RightsLink: Licensee:
G. Shanmugam. License Number: 3943960297024. License Date: September 7, 2016.
28 G. Shanmugam
of breccias. Although, these breccias may appear Based on the Integrated Ocean Drilling Program
similar, there are distinct differences. (IODP) Expedition 316 cores in the Nankai Trough
Seismogenic Zone (Japan), Sakaguchi et al. (2011)
4.2. Fault breccias studied the origin of earthquake-induced mud brec-
cias along subduction zones. An important type of
This is the most common type associated with earthquake-induced SSDS is “intraclast breccia layers”
tectonic earthquakes, and thus it is often called tec- formed by tectonic faults in the Dead Sea Basin (Agnon
tonic breccias. Other synonyms are earthquake brec- et al., 2006). In fact, Seilacher (1969) first used the
cias (Rowe et al., 2013) and dilational fault breccias fault-graded beds as the basis for introducing the ge-
(Melosh et al., 2014). Woodcock et al. (2014) recog- netic term “seismites”.
nized different types of breccias along fault zones in Sibson (1986) discussed brecciation processes in
South Wales (Fig. 18) based on the degree of disag- fault zones as well as associated hydrothermal miner-
gregation of the protolith, and on the percentage of alization. Processes commonly associated with fault
large (>2 mm) clasts in the overall rock volume. zones are:
These types are:
1) Brecciation, microcracking, creation of new void
1) Mosaic breccias (Fig. 19A). spaces (porosity) and dilatancy (Sibson, 1986;
2) Chaotic breccias (Fig. 19B). Woodcock et al., 2014).
3) Crackle breccias (Fig. 19A and C). 2) Cataclasis and the generation of fault gouge
4) Megabreccias with very large clasts (>1 m in diam- (Engelder, 1974; Sibson, 1977).
eter) (Fig. 19A). 3) Hydrothermal mineralization (Sibson, 1986).
Fig. 18 A − Geological map of the Pembrokeshire Peninsula, southwest Wales, United Kingdom, with 30 breccia localities associated with
faults; B − Location and geological context of main map. Figure from Woodcock et al. (2014), with permission from Elsevier. Copyright
Clearance Center's RightsLink: Licensee: G. Shanmugam. License Number: 3943690558071. License Date: September 7, 2016.
Fig. 19 A − Outcrop photograph showing breccia zones related to vertical cross faults at Flimston Bay (locality 1, Fig. 18). Photo by Sid
Howells; B − An example of chaotic breccia at Bullslaughter east (locality 3, Fig. 18); C − An example of crackle breccia at Proud Giltar
(locality 17, Fig. 18). All three figures are from Woodcock et al. (2014), with permission from Elsevier. Copyright Clearance Center's Right-
sLink: Licensee: G. Shanmugam. License Number: 3943690558071. License Date: September 7, 2016.
4) Smearing of clays and creation of fault seals (Caine interpreted as the dilational tips of listric normal
et al., 1996; Egholm et al., 2008). faults, and the cross-strike faults as transtensional
5) Fault sealing and fluid flow in hydrocarbon reser- transfer zones. Sub-horizontal clast fabrics suggest
voirs (Knipe et al., 1998). brecciation by gravitational collapse into opening
6) Cementation and reduction of porosity (Minor and fissures rather than by cataclasis along the faults. The
Hudson, 2006). importance of this case study is that various authors
have offered different mechanisms to explain the
In a detailed field study of chaotic breccia zones origin of breccias in South Wales (Fig. 20B):
on the Pembroke Peninsula of South Wales (Fig. 18),
Woodcock et al. (2014) documented evidence for 1) Dixon (1921) proposed karstic solution of limestone,
collapse into voids along dilational faults. They have producing large voids into which wall and roof rocks
mapped faults and classified breccia types using 30 progressively collapsed (Fig. 20Ba).
localities (Fig. 18). Chaotic breccias and mega- 2) Hancock (1964) and Thomas (1970) proposed for-
breccias (Fig. 19A) hosted within the Pembroke mation by tectonic fragmentation along faults
Limestone Group (Visean, Mississippian, Lower (Fig. 20Bb).
Carboniferous) of southwest Wales are re-mapped 3) Woodcock et al. (2006) attributed megabreccia
along with spatially-related crackle and mosaic along the Dent Fault, Northwest England, to
breccias (Fig. 19B). Of thirteen studied megabreccia collapse of voids produced by dilational fault
bodies, seven lie along steep, NNW- or NNE-striking displacement (Fig. 20Bc).
strike-slip faults originating during North−South 4) Walsh et al. (2008) concluded that the mega-
Variscan (Late Carboniferous) shortening (Fig. 20A), breccias were formed by more than one mecha-
though reactivated during later extension. Four nism, and suggested a phreatic explosion due to
bodies are conformable with EeW striking, steeply- upward escape of thermally-driven superheated
dipping bedding, and two have irregular or indeter- fluids (Fig. 20Bd). This type could also be classified
minate margins. The bedding parallel zones are as volcanic breccias.
30 G. Shanmugam
Fig. 20 A − (a) Diagrammatic map of folds and conjugate strike−slip faults formed by north−south Variscan shortening; (b) Map of postulated
post-Variscan north−south extensional reactivation of Variscan faults and steepened bedding; (c) Cross-section across a dilational normal fault
that steepens to parallel bedding at shallow depths; B − Schematic diagram of four types of breccia formation mechanisms (see text for
details). Breccia types are labeled in this article. Both figures are from Woodcock et al. (2014), with permission from Elsevier. Copyright
Clearance Center's RightsLink: Licensee: G. Shanmugam. License Number: 3943690558071. License Date: September 7, 2016.
4.3. Volcanic breccias composed of broken, angular, pyroclastic fragments, is

common in both subaerial (Fig. 21) (Fisher, 1984) and
Volcanic breccias represent not only those that submarine (Head and Wilson, 2003) environments.
occur within the central vent but also that accumulate
from pyroclastic debris flows or lahar on the flanks of a
4.4. Meteorite breccias
volcano. Fisher (1960) classified volcanic breccias into
three major categories based on process of
Meteorite breccias (also known as impact breccias)
fragmentation:
are diagnostic of an impact event such as an asteroid or
comet striking the Earth. Breccias of this type may be
1) Autoclastic breccias.
present on or beneath the floor of the crater, on the rim,
2) Pyroclastic breccias (Fig. 21).
or in the ejecta expelled beyond the crater. Bischoff
3) Epiclastic breccias.
et al. (2006) discussed the nature and origins of mete-
orite breccias. They have described nine types, namely:
Autoclastic volcanic breccias result from internal
processes acting during movement of semisolid or solid
lava; they include flow breccia and intrusion breccia. 1) Primitive, accretionary.
Pyroclastic breccias are produced by volcanic explo- 2) Genomict breccias.
sion and include vulcanian breccia, pyroclastic flow 3) Regolith breccias.
breccia, and hydrovolcanic breccia. Epiclastic volcanic 4) Fragmental breccias.
breccias result from transportation of loose volcanic 5) Impact melt breccias (Fig. 22).
material by epigene geomorphic agents, or by gravity, 6) Granulitic breccias.
and include laharic breccia, water-laid volcanic 7) Polymict breccias.
breccia, and volcanic talus breccia. Other volcanic 8) Monomict breccias.
breccia terms are discussed. The pyroclastic type, 9) Dimict breccias.
Fig. 21 A − Photograph of Mount St. Helens. Plumes of steam, gas, and ash often occurred at in the early 1980s. Photo by Lyn Topinka. Credit:
Wikipedia; B − Angular pumice blocks near the front of a volcanic debris flow associated with the eruption of the Mount St. Helens on May 18,
1980. This type of deposits is qualified to be classified both as “volcanic breccia” and as “sedimentary−depositional breccia”. Photo by T.A.
Leighley. Credit: USGS (http://libraryphoto.cr.usgs.gov/cgi-bin/show_picture.cgi?ID=ID.CVO-F.73ct&SIZE=large), October 17, 1980. Accessed
February 27, 2011. Figure from Shanmugam (2012a), with permission from Elsevier. Copyright Clearance Center's RightsLink: Licensee: G.
Shanmugam. License Number: 3950801388442. License Date: September 16, 2016.
Cantarell Oil Field, Mexico: In a rare case study,

Grajales−Nishimura et al. (2000) attributed the origin
of oil-producing (1.3 million barrels per day)
carbonate-breccia reservoir facies in the Cantarell Oil
Field in Mexico to major slumping, caused by the
Chicxulub impact (K−Pg Boundary) and related tsu-
namis. The lower oil-producing breccia unit is nearly
300 m (984 ft) in thickness (Grajales−Nishimura et al.,
2000, their Fig. 2A). It exhibits secondary vuggy
porosity due to dissolution. Its average porosity varies
from 8% to 12% and its permeability is commonly in the
range of 3000−5000 mD. This is the only reported
Fig. 22 An example of meteorite breccia. Typical texture of an petroleum-producing reservoir associated with the
impact melt clast within an R chondrite. From Bischoff et al. (2006). Chicxulub event.
See also Bischoff (2000). Credit: University of Arizona Press. Alamo Event, Devonian, Nevada: The Alamo Event
produced diagnostic megabreccias (Fig. 25). Pinto and
Warme (2008) established a crater stratigraphy with
Characteristics of meteorite breccias are discussed five breccia units that characterize the Rim Realm, in
using case studies below. Although limited in number, ascending order: 1) deformed target rocks, 2) injected
the following case studies are useful for understanding dikes and sills, 3) chaotic fallback, 4) smeared fall-
meteorite breccias. back, and 5) resurge.
Chicxulub Impact Crater, Yucatan, Mexico (Fig. 23): Ka€rdla Crater, NW Estonia: Kleesment et al. (2006)
An ideal impact breccia sequence with six divisions discussed impact-induced features in five boreholes
(Fig. 24) has been described by Velasco−Villareal et al. drilled around the Ka €rdla impact meteorite structure
(2011). where breccias are common. Quartz grains with planar
32 G. Shanmugam
Fig. 23 Location of drill boreholes in the Chicxulub Impact Crater showing the position of Yaxcopoil-1 borehole in the southern sector of the
crater. Figure from Velasco-Villareal et al. (2011), with permission from Elsevier. Copyright Clearance Center's RightsLink: Licensee: G.
deformation features and planar fractures, as well as suite of hydrothermal minerals deposited at different
cracked grains showing lowered crystallinity by X-ray stages in the development of the hydrothermal
diffractometry, were recorded. system.
Meteorite Impact Site (Late Cambrian−Early Ordo- Moon and other planetary bodies: Meyer (2003)
vician), Permian Basin, Texas: Malone (2015) suggested compiled an excellent collection of samples of lunar
a meteorite impact crater involving shattered base- breccias. These breccias are the lithified aggregates of
ment rock and ejecta, which is positioned ideally for clastic debris and melt generated by meteorite
its petroleum potential. bombardment of the lunar surface. Most of the brec-
Haughton impact structure, Devon Island, Cana- cias returned by the Apollo missions were formed in
dian Arctic: According to Osinski et al. (2005), a the ancient lunar highlands about 3900e4000 million
moderate- to low-temperature hydrothermal system years ago. Meyer (2003) also illustrated the geologic
was generated at Haughton by the interaction of setting of craters (Fig. 27A) and proposed an inverse
groundwaters with the hot impact melt breccias that stratigraphy on the crater rim (Fig. 27B).
filled the interior of the crater (Fig. 26). Four distinct
settings and styles of hydrothermal mineralization are 4.5. Sedimentary breccias
recognized at Haughton: 1) vugs and veins within the
impact melt breccias, with an increase in intensity of There are many types of sedimentary breccias,
alteration towards the base; 2) cementation of brec- namely:
ciated lithologies in the interior of the central uplift;
3) intense veining around the heavily faulted 1) Depositional breccias in subaerial environments
and fractured outer margin of the central uplift; (e.g., alluvial fans; McPherson et al., 1987); brec-
and 4) hydrothermal pipe structures or gossans and cias associated with lahars can be classified both as
mineralization along fault surfaces around the faulted volcanic breccias and as sedimentary breccias
crater rim. Each setting is associated with a different (Fig. 21).
Fig. 24 Impact breccia sequence, composed of six parts, in the Yaxcopoil-1 borehole. See Stoeffler et al. (2004) for original core photo-
graphs. Figure from Velasco-Villareal et al. (2011), with permission from Elsevier. Copyright Clearance Center's RightsLink: Licensee: G.
2) Depositional breccias in marginal-marine environ- 2016). In this review, sedimentary-depositional and

ments (e.g., fan deltas and braid deltas; McPherson sedimentary-collapse types are considered.
et al., 1987) (Fig. 28). In South China near Guilin, for example, some of
3) Depositional breccias in deep-marine environments the best developed karst topography with tower karsts
(Shanmugam, 2012a) (Fig. 29). and large caves are evident (Shanmugam, 1990;
4) Post-depositional breccias (Shanmugam, 2016). Sweeting, 1978; Williams, 1978). Inside these modern
5) Non-depositional breccias (Blount and Moore, caves, a combination of factors, such as dissolution of
1969). carbonate rocks and fracturing, have led to accumu-
6) Karst-related collapse breccias in caves (Friedman, lation of collapse breccias on the floor of the caves
1997; Loucks, 2001). Synonyms for collapse brec- (Fig. 30). Paleocave breccia types are discussed by
cias are solution or dissolution breccias, karst Loucks (2001) and by Loucks and Mescher (2001)
breccias, and cave breccias. (Fig. 31). The economic importance of collapse brec-
cias associated with uranium deposits in pipes is dis-
A common type of sedimentary breccia is the one cussed by Finch (1992) (Fig. 32). The Orphan lode
associated with mass-transport deposits (MTD), such as mine, located within the Grand Canyon National Park
debris flows in subaerial (Fig. 21), marginal-marine in Arizona (USA), produced 4.6 million pounds of Tri-
(Fig. 28), and deep-marine environments (Fig. 29) uranium octoxide (U3O8) with an average grade of
(Shanmugam, 2012a). Furthermore, sedimentary brec- 0.42% of U3O8 from a mineralized, collapse-breccia
cias can be grouped into two other types: 1) deposi- pipe during 1956e1969 (Chenoweth, 1986).
tional (i.e., breccias formed during deposition), and 2) Typical diameter of a solution pipe with uranium
post-depositional (i.e., breccias formed after deposi- ore is about 100 m (Fig. 32). Wenrich and Titley (2008)
tion during burial and sediment loading) (Shanmugam, proposed a genetic model in which uranium
34 G. Shanmugam
Fig. 25 A − Stratigraphic column showing traditional divisions of Alamo Breccia (Devonian) with megabreccia. Figure from Warme and
Morrow (2009); B − Study area in Nevada (USA) showing towns (squares), Devonian localities (x's), and lateral distribution zones of Alamo
Breccia. Breccia thicknesses: Zone 1, ~130 m; Zone 2, ~60 m; Zone 3, <1e10 m. Figure from Warme and Sandberg (1996); C − Outcrop
photograph showing disintegrating clast in Alamo Breccia. Figure from Warme and Morrow (2009).
Fig. 26 A schematic cross-section showing the nature of the hydrothermal system shortly after the Haughton impact event. Figure from
Osinski et al. (2005).
mineralization is attributed to the Mississippi Valley 3) They are hosted mainly by dolostone and limestone.
Type (MVT) deposits, with a uranium overprint. Char- 4) The dominant minerals are sphalerite ((Zn,Fe)S),
acteristics of MVT deposits were discussed by Leach galena (PbS), pyrite (FeS2), and marcasite (FeS2).
et al. (2010). Important properties are that: 5) They occur in platform carbonate sequences.
6) The ore fluids were basinal brines with ~10e30 wt.
1) They are epigenetic. percent salts.
2) They are not associated with igneous activity. 7) They have crustal sources for metals and sulfur.
Fig. 27 A − Geological setting of impact breccias in a giant impact crater; B − The material that is thrown out of the crater is deposited in a
reverse stratigraphy (shown by numbers 1, 2, and 3) on the rim of the crater. Both figures are from Meyer (2003). Credit: NASA.
Fig. 28 Sedimentary−depositional breccia showing inverse grading (arrow), suggesting deposition from debris flows. There is an abun-
dance of blueschist and other metamorphic clasts. This stratum has been interpreted as fan−delta deposits (Stuart, 1979). San Onofre
Breccia, Miocene, Dana Point, California. Red scale (center of photo) = 15 cm. Figure from Shanmugam (2012a), with permission from
Elsevier. Copyright Clearance Center's RightsLink: Licensee: G. Shanmugam. License Number: 3950801388442. License Date: September
16, 2016.
36 G. Shanmugam
Fig. 29 An example of sedimentary−depositional breccia: Pliocene reservoir sands in upper-slope canyon environments, offshore Krish-
na−Godavari (KG) Basin, India. A − Sedimentological log of core 7 for the interval 2115e2121 m in well 3 showing massive sand with floating
brecciated mudstone clasts; B − Lithofacies 1 core photograph showing brecciated mudstone clasts. Arrow shows stratigraphic position of
photograph. Figure from Shanmugam et al., (2009). Credit: SEPM.
4.6. Implications
Major differences among the five types of breccias

and their implications are as follows:
1) In general, meteorite breccias are distinguished by

their shock features (e.g., planar deformation in
mineral grains, high-pressure polymorphs, shock
melts, etc.) from fault breccias, which are formed
much more slowly and do not have shock features.
However, ejecta-related breccias that do not
exhibit melt features are difficult to distinguish
from sedimentary−depositional breccias. Also,
Maddock (1983) reported fault-generated pseudo-
Fig. 30 Development of large caves in the Devonian−Upper tachylytes from the Outer Hebrides Thrust Zone,
Carboniferous carbonates as part of karst topography near Guilin, Scotland, and explained that the textures were
along the banks of Li River, Southern China. Note collapse breccia on resulted from the primary crystallization of a clast-
the floor at water level. Figure modified after Shanmugam (1990), laden melt rather than from the devitrification of a
with permission from AAPG.
glass, or from crushing and cataclasis.
2) Meteorite breccias are associated with hydrother-
mal activity, whereas most sedimentary breccias
8) Temperatures of ore deposition are typically 75 C are not. However, hydrothermal breccias in vein-
to about 200 C. brak, 1997).
type ore deposits are present (Je
9) The most important ore controls are faults and 3) Sedimentary breccias are indicative of primary
fractures, and dissolution collapse breccias. porosity and permeability, whereas meteorite
Fig. 31 Paleocave facies showing breccia types. Figure from Loucks (2001).
breccias commonly are subjected to high pressure 7) In basin analysis, karst breccias are useful in
and high temperature melt events. recognizing erosional unconformities (Shanmugam,
4) Although sedimentary breccias of different origins 1988).
may look alike, recognizing breccias in sol- 8) Sedimentary breccias are subjected to sediment
ution−collapse pipes is vital because of their asso- transport and indicative of a variable sediment
ciation with uranium deposits (Fig. 32). provenance, whereas meteorite breccias are
5) Analogous to leaching conditions that developed commonly local in origin.
caves in South China (Fig. 30), porosity enhance- 9) Fault breccias and sedimentary breccias exhibit
ment from chert dissolution beneath Neocomian normal stratigraphy, whereas meteorite breccias
unconformity had resulted in favorable reservoir are associated with reverse stratigraphy of the
quality in the Prudhoe Bay Field (i.e., the Ivishak crater rim.
Formation), North Slope, Alaska (Shanmugam and
Higgins, 1988). Perhaps the most important implication is that it is
6) Deep-water sandy debrites, with depositional fundamentally a challenge to interpret the origin of
breccias (Fig. 29), comprise important petroleum breccias. As discussed earlier, the same breccias have
reservoirs worldwide (Shanmugam, 2012a; been interpreted differently by different authors
Shanmugam et al., 2009). as karst breccias, fault breccias, and “explosion”
38 G. Shanmugam
Fig. 32 Schematic cross section of a solutionecollapse breccia pipe in the Grand Canyon Region (USA) showing the distribution of uranium
ore (U ore) in the pipe. Pipe height and diameter are about 915 m and 100 m, respectively. Stratigraphic section modified after Van Gosen and
Wenrich (1989). Figure from Finch (1992). Credit: USGS. See also Dahlkamp (1990).
Fig. 33 Summary diagram showing that SSDS with breccias can be interpreted as five different types with different implications. Note that
sedimentary−depositional breccias are the only type that preserves the depositional porosity and permeability at the time of deposition
without diagenesis. However, sedimentary breccias are subjected to post-depositional diagenesis. For example, all five types are susceptible
to develop secondary porosity (Shanmugam, 1985).
volcanic megabreccias in South Wales (Fig. 20B). sedimentaryedepositional breccias) has practical im-
Furthermore, megabreccias have been associated with plications for stratigraphy, sedimentology, prove-
both faulting (Woodcock et al., 2014) and meteorite nance, diagenesis, and reservoir quality. In moving
impacts (Warme and Morrow, 2009). Therefore, clas- forward, it is necessary to abandon the current prac-
sifying SSDS with breccias as “seismites” unnecessarily tice of interpreting SSDS as seismites routinely.
distracts from the primary objective of establishing
the true origin of breccias (Fig. 33), which has direct
implications for understanding petroleum reservoirs
(Fig. 29) and economic ore deposits (Fig. 32).
Acknowledgements
I thank Prof. Zeng-Zhao Feng (Editor-in-Chief of the

5. Concluding remarks Journal of Palaeogeography; China University of Pe-
troleum, Beijing) for inviting me to contribute my
The purpose of interpreting SSDS as seismites is to earlier review entitled “The seismite problem” and for
explain the precise origin of their deformation. How- encouraging me to write this companion paper as well.
ever, seismicity is omnipresent worldwide and is I also thank the JoP editor Dr. Xiu-Fang Hu for her help
associated with a multitude of phenomena, namely with solving submission-related computer problems
global tectonics, meteorite impacts, volcanic phe- and for her initial work during submission process. I
nomena, oceanographic (tsunami) phenomena, mete- thank the editor Dr. Min Liu (Amy) for her excellent
orologic (cyclone) phenomena, and eustatic (sea level) editing of the manuscript.
events. Therefore, naming SSDS simply as “seismites”, Prof. Tian-Rui Song, Institute of Geology, Chinese
without identifying the true cause of the seismic Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing; Prof. Hong-
shocks, is fallacious. Importantly, distinguishing Bo Lü, Department of Geology, China University of
the correct origin of SSDS (e.g., meteorite versus Petroleum, Shandong Province; Dr. D.W. Kirkland,
40 G. Shanmugam
retired Research Scientist from Mobil Oil Corporation, triggers margin collapse and extensive sediment gravity
Texas; and an anonymous reviewer are thanked for flows. Geology, 26, 331e334.
their detailed and helpful comments that considerably Brothers, D.S., Luttrell, K.M., Chaytor, J.D., 2013. Sea-
level-induced seismicity and submarine landslide occur-
improved the quality of this paper. As always, I am
rence. Geology, 41, 979e982.
grateful to my wife, Jean Shanmugam, for her general Busby, C.J., Yip, G., Blikra, L., Renne, P., 2002. Coastal land-
comments. sliding and catastrophic sedimentation triggered by Cre-
taceous−Tertiary bolide impact: a pacific margin
example? Geology, 30, 687e690.
References Caine, J.S., Evans, J.P., Forster, C.B., 1996. Fault zone ar-
chitecture and permea bility structure. Geology, 24,
1025e1028.
Agnon, A., Migowski, C., Marco, S., 2006. Intraclast breccias Chenoweth, W.I., 1986. The Orphan Lode Mine, Grand
in laminated sequences reviewed: recorders of paleo- Canyon, Arizona: a Case Study of a Mineralized,
earthquakes. In: Enzel, Y., Agnon, A., Stein, M. (Eds.), Collapse-breccia Pipe. U.S. Geological Survey Open File
Frontiers in Dead Sea Paleoenvironmental Research, Report, pp. 86e510.
vol. 401. GSA Special Paper, pp. 195e214. Claeys, P., Kiessling, W., Alvarez, W., 2002. Distribution of
Allen, C.R., 1975. Geological criteria for evaluating seis- Chicxulub ejecta at the Cretaceous−Tertiary boundary.
micity. GSA Bulletin, 86, 1041e1057. In: Koeberl, C., MacLeod, K.G. (Eds.), Catastrophic
Allen, J.R.L., 1984. Sedimentary Structures, Their Char- Events and Mass Extinctions: Impacts and beyond, vol.
acter and Physical Basis. I, p. 593 and II, pp. 343−663. 356. GSA Special Paper, pp. 55e68.
Elsevier, Amsterdam. Collins, G.S., Melosh, H.J., Marcus, R.A., 2005. Earth impact
ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers), 1907. The Ef- effects program: a web-based computer program for
fects of the San Francisco Earthquake of April 18th, calculating the regional environmental consequences of
1906, on Engineering Constructions: Reports of a General a meteoroid impact on Earth. Meteoritics & Planetary
Committee and of Six Special Committees of the San Science, 40, 817e840.
Francisco Association of Members of the American Soci- Collinson, J.D., 1994. Sedimentary deformational struc-
ety of Civil Engineers. Transactions. Paper No. 1056. tures. In: Maltman, A. (Ed.), The Geological Deformation
Barruol, G., Cordier, E., Bascou, J., Fontaine, F.R., of Sediments. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 95e125.
Legresy, B., Lescarmontier, L., 2013. Tide-induced micro- Covey, C., Thompson, S.L., Weissman, P.R.,
seismicity in the Mertz glacier grounding area, East MacCracken, M.C., 1994. Global climatic effects of atmo-
Antarctica. Geophysical Research Letters, 40, spheric dust from an asteroid or comet impact on Earth.
5412e5416. Global Planetary Change, 9, 263e273.
Basilone, L., Lena, G., Gasparo-Morticelli, M., 2014. Synse- Dahlkamp, F.J., 1990. Uranium deposits in collapse breccia
dimentary-tectonic, soft-sediment deformation and pipes in the Grand canyon region, Colorado plateau,
volcanism in the rifted Tethyan margin from the upper USA. Mitteilungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereines
Triassicemiddle Jurassic deep-water carbonates in cen- für Steiermark, 120, 89e98.
tral Sicily. Sedimentary Geology, 308, 63e79. Day, S., Maslin, M., 2005. Linking large impacts, gas hy-
Beck, C., 2009. Lake sediments as late quaternary palaeo- drates, and carbon isotope excursions through widespread
seismic archives: examples in northewestern alps and sediment liquefaction and continental slope failure: the
clues for earthquake-origin assessment of sedimentary example of the K−T boundary event. In: Kenkmann, T.,
disturbances. Earth-Science Reviews, 96, 327e344. Ho€rz, F., Deutsch, A. (Eds.), Large Meteorite Impacts III,
Becker, L., 2002. Repeated blows. Scientific American, 286, vol. 384. GSA Special Paper, pp. 239e258.
76e83. Dixon, E.E.L., 1921. The Geology of the South Wales Coal-
Bischoff, A., 2000. Mineralogical characterization of primi- field, Part XIII: the Country around Pembroke and
tive, type-3 lithologies in Rumuruti chondrites. Meteor- Tenby. In: Memoir, Geological Survey of the United
itics & Planetary Science, 35, 699e706. Kingdom. Her (His) Majesty's Stationery Office
Bischoff, A., Scott, E.R.D., Metzler, K., Goodrich, C.A., (H.M.S.O.).
2006. Nature and origins of meteoritic breccias. In: Egholm, D.G., Clausen, O.R., Sandiford, M.,
Lauretta, D.S., McSweeen Jr., H.Y. (Eds.), Meteorites Kristensen, M.B., Korstg ard, J.A., 2008. The mechanics
and the Early Solar System II. University of Arizona of clay smearing along faults. Geology, 36, 787e790.
Press, pp. 679e712. Engelder, J.T., 1974. Cataclasis and the generation of fault
Blount, D., Moore, C.H., 1969. Depositional and non- gouge. GSA Bulletin, 85, 1515e1522.
depositional carbonate breccias, Chiantla quadrangle, Finch, W.I., 1992. Descriptive model of solutionecollapse
Guatemala. GSA Bulletin, 80, 429e442. breccia pipe uranium deposits. U.S. Geological Survey
Boulton, G.S., Dobbie, K.E., Zatsepin, S., 2001. Sediment Bulletin, 2004. In: Bliss, J.D. (Ed.), Developments in Min-
deformation beneath glaciers and its coupling to the sub- eral Deposit Modelling, pp. 33e35.
glacial hydraulic system. Quaternary International, 86, Fisher, R.V., 1960. A classification of volcanic breccias. GSA
3e28. Bulletin, 71, 973e982.
Bralower, T.J., Paull, C.K., Leckie, R.M., 1998. The Creta- Fisher, R.V., 1983. Flow transformations in sediment gravity
ceous−Tertiary boundary cocktail: Chicxulub impact flows. Geology, 11, 273e274.
Fisher, R.V., 1984. Pyroclastic Rocks. Springer-Verlag, Berlin changes in minerals in the sandy ejecta of the Ka €rdla
Heildelberg, p. 472. crater, NW Estonia. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy
Fjeldskaar, W., Lindholm, C., Dehls, J.F., Fjeldskaar, I., of Sciences. Geology, 55, 189e212.
2000. Postglacial uplift, neotectonics and seismicity in Knipe, R.J., Jones, G., Fisher, Q.J., 1998. Faulting, fault
Fennoscandia. Quaternary Science Reviews, 19, sealing and fluid flow in hydrocarbon reservoirs: an intro-
1413e1422. duction. In: Jones, G., Fisher, Q.J., Knipe, R.J. (Eds.),
Friedman, G.M., 1997. Dissolution-collapse breccias and Faulting Fault Sealing and Fluid Flow in Hydrocarbon
paleokarst resulting from dissolution of evaporite rocks, Reservoirs, 147. Geological Society of London, Special
especially sulfates. Carbonates and Evaporites, 12, Publication, pp. 7e21.
53e63. Lahr, J.C., Chouet, B.A., Stephens, C.D., Power, J.A.,
Geist, E.L., 2005. Local Tsunami Hazards in the Pacific Page, R.A., 1994. Earthquake classification, location,
Northwest from Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes. and error analysis in a volcanic environment: implications
U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1661-B, p. 17. for the magmatic system of the 1989−1990 eruptions at
Goslin, J., Lourenco, N., Dziak, R.P., Bohnenstiehl, D.R., Redoubt Volcano, Alaska. Journal of Volcanology and
Haxel, J., Luis, J., 2005. Long-term seismicity of the Rey- Geothermal Research, 62, 137e151.
kjanes Ridge (North Atlantic) recorded by a regional hy- Leach, D.L., Taylor, R.D., Fey, D.L., Diehl, S.F., Saltus, R.W.,
drophone array. Geophysical Journal International, 162, 2010. A deposit model for Mississippi Valley-Type lead-
516e524. zinc ores: chapter A. In: Mineral Deposit Models for
Gradmann, S., Beaumont, C., Ings, S.J., 2012. Coupled fluid Resource Assessment. USGS Scientific Investigations
flow and sediment deformation in margin-scale salt-tec- Report 2010-5070-A, p. 64. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/
tonic systems: 1. Development and application of simple, 2010/5070/a/pdf/SIR10-5070A.pdf (Accessed 7 October
single-lithology models. Tectonics, 31. TC4010. 2016).
Grajales-Nishimura, J.M., Cedillo-Pardo, E., Rosales- Logan, W.E., 1863. Report on the Geology of Canada. John
Domínguez, C., Mora n-Zenteno, D., Alvarez, W., Lovell, Montreal, Canada, p. 464.
Claeys, P., Ruíz-Morales, J., García-Herna ndez, J., Loucks, R.G., 2001. Modern analogs for paleocave-sediment
Padilla-Avila, P., Sa nchez-Ríos, A., 2000. Chicxulub fills and their importance in identifying paleocave reser-
impact: the origin of reservoir and seal facies in the voirs. Transactions-Gulf Coast Association of Geological
southeastern Mexico oil fields. Geology, 28, 307e310. Societies, 46, 195e206.
Greb, S.F., Archer, A.W., 2007. Soft-sediment deformation Loucks, R.G., Mescher, P., 2001. Paleocave facies classifi-
produced by tides in a meizoseismic area, Turnagain cation and associated pore types. In: American Associ-
Arm, Alaska. Geology, 35, 435e438. ation of Petroleum Geologists, Southwest Section,
Greene, M., Power, M., Youd, T.L., 1994. Earthquake basics Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas, March 11e13, CD-
Brief No. 1. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute ROM, p. 18.
Publication, Oakland, California, p. 8. Lowman, P., Yates, J., Masuoka, P., Montgomery, B.,
Hancock, P.L., 1964. The relations between folds and late- O'Leary, J., Salisbury, D., 1999. A digital tectonic activity
formed joints in South Pembrokeshire. Geological Maga- map of the Earth. Journal of Geoscience Education, 47,
zine, 101, 174e184. 428e437.
Head III, J.W., Wilson, L., 2003. Deep submarine pyroclastic Maddock, R.H., 1983. Melt origin of fault-generated pseudo-
eruptions: theory and predicted landforms and deposits. tachylites demonstrated by textures. Geology, 11,
Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 121, 105e108.
155e193. Malone, S.J., 2015. Discovery of a Probable Meteorite
Helwig, J., 1970. Slump folds and early structures, north- Impact Site of Late Cambrian−Early Ordovician Age in
eastern Newfoundland Appalachians. Journal of Geology, the Permian Basin, Crockett County, Texas, and its Impli-
78, 172e187. cations for Hydrocarbon Exploration. Search and Discov-
Holzer, T.L., Youd, T.L., 2007. Liquefaction, ground oscilla- ery Article, No. 10719 (2015).
tion, and soil deformation at the Wildlife Array, Califor- Malkawi, A.I.H., Alawneh, A.S., 2000. Paleoearthquake fea-
nia. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, tures as indicators of potential earthquake activities in
97, 961e976. the Karameh Dam Site. Natural Hazards, 22, 1e16.
Isacks, B., Oliver, J., Sykes, L.R., 1968. Seismology and the Maltman, A., 1984. On the term soft-sediment deformation.
new global tectonics. Journal of Geophysical Research- Journal of Structural Geology, 6, 589e592.
Atmospheres, 73, 5855e5899. Maltman, A., 1994. Introduction and overview. In:
Jebrak, M., 1997. Hydrothermal breccias in vein-type ore Maltman, A. (Ed.), The Geological Deformation of Sedi-
deposits: a review of mechanisms, morphology and size ments. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 1e35.
distribution. Ore Geology Reviews, 12, 111e134. Marcus, R., Melosh, H.J., Collins, G., 2010. Earth Impact Ef-
Kearey, P., Klepeis, K.A., Vine, F.J., 2009. Global Tectonics, fects Program. Imperial College, London, UK, and Purdue
third ed. Wiley-Blackwell, p. 496. University.
Kirkland, D.W., Anderson, R.Y., 1970. Microfolding in the McPherson, J.G., Shanmugam, G., Moiola, R.J., 1987. Fan-
Castile and Todilto evaporites, Texas and New Mexico. deltas and braid deltas: varieties of coarse-grained
GSA Bulletin, 81, 3259e3282. deltas. GSA Bulletin, 99, 331e340.
Kleesment, A., Konsa, M., Puura, V., Karhu, J., Preeden, U., Melosh, B.L., Rowe, C.D., Smit, L., Groenewald, C.,
Kallaste, T., 2006. Impact-induced and diagenetic Lambert, C.W., Macey, P., 2014. Snap, Crackle, Pop:
42 G. Shanmugam
dilational fault breccias record seismic slip below the Earthquake of April 18, 1906, vol. 2. Carnegie Institution
brittle-plastic transition. Earth and Planetary Science of Washington, Washington, D.C., 1910.
Letters, 403, 432e445. Roman, D.C., Cashman, K.V., 2006. The origin of volcano-
Meng, X., Peng, Z., Yang, H., Allman, S., 2013. Hurricane tectonic earthquake swarms. Geology, 34, 457e460.
Irene's Impacts on the Aftershock Sequence of the 2011 Rowe, C.D., Melosh, B.L., Lamothe, K., Schnitzer, V.,
Mw5.8 Virginia Earthquake. American Geophysical Bate, C., 2013. Earthquake Breccias (Invited). American
Union, Fall Meeting 2013, Abstract# S51B-2369. Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2013, Abstract # T52A-01.
Meyer, C., 2003. Lunar breccia. In: NASA Lunar Petrographic Ruff, L.J., 1996. Large earthquakes in subduction zones. In:
Educational Thin Section Set. http://www-curator.jsc. Bebout, G.E., Scholl, D.W., Kirby, S.H., Platt, J.P. (Eds.),
nasa.gov/Education/LPETSS/index.cfm (Accessed 20 Subduction Top to Bottom. Geophysical Monograph Se-
July 2016). ries, first ed., pp. 91e104.
Minor, S.A., Hudson, M.R., 2006. Regional Survey of Struc- Rundquist, D.V., Sobolev, P.O., 2002. Seismicity of mid-
tural Properties and Cementation Patterns of Fault oceanic ridges and its geodynamic implications: a review.
Zones in the Northern Part of the Albuquerque Basin, Earth-Science Reviews, 58, 143e161.
New Mexico: Implications for Ground-water Flow. U.S. Sakaguchi, A., Kimura, G., Strasser, M., Screaton, E.J.,
Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1719, p. 32. Curewitz, D., Murayama, M., 2011. Episodic seafloor
Moran, S.C., Malone, S.D., Qamar, A.I., Thelen, W., mud brecciation due to great subduction zone earth-
Wright, A.K., Caplan-Auerback, J., 2008. Seismicity asso- quakes. Geology, 39, 919e922.
ciated with the renewed dome-building at Mount St. Hel- Scholz, C.H., 1990. The Mechanics of Earthquakes and
ens, 2004−2008. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Faulting. Cambridge University Press, New York,
Paper, 1750. In: Sherrod, D.R., Scott, W.E., p. 439.
Stauffer, P.H. (Eds.), A Volcano Rekindled: the Renewed Scholz, H., Frieling, D., Aehnelt, M., 2011. Synsedimentary
Eruption of Mount St. Helens, 2004e2006. deformational structures caused by tectonics and seismic
NGDC/WDS (National Geophysical Data Center/World Data events d examples from the Cambrian of Sweden,
Service), 2016. Significant Earthquake Database. Na- Permian and Cenozoic of Germany. In: Sharkov, E. (Ed.),
tional Geophysical Data Center, NOAA. http:// New Frontiers in Tectonic Research d General Problems,
dx.doi.org/10.7289/V5TD9V7K (Accessed 27 July 2016). Sedimentary Basins and Island Arcs, Chapter 9,
Norris, R.D., Firth, J.V., 2002. Mass wasting of Atlantic con- pp. 183e218.
tinental margins following the Chicxulub impact event. Schulte, P., Alegret, L., Arenillas, I., Arz, J.A., Barton, P.J.,
In: Koeberl, C., MacLeod, K.G. (Eds.), Catastrophic Bown, P.R., Bralower, T.J., Christeson, G.L., Claeys, P.,
Events and Mass Extinctions: Impacts and beyond, vol. Cockell, C.S., Collins, G.S., Deutsch, A., Goldin, T.J.,
356. GSA Special Paper, pp. 79e95. Goto, K., Grajales-Nishimura, J.M., Grieve, R.A.F.,
Obermeier, S., Pond, E., Olson, S., Green, R., 2002. Paleoli- Gulick, S.P.S., Johnson, K.R., Kiessling, W., Koeberl, C.,
quefaction studies in continental settings, vol. 359. GSA Kring, D.A., MacLeod, K.G., Matsui, T., Melosh, J.,
Special Paper, pp. 13e27. Montanari, A., Morgan, J.V., Neal, C.R., Nichols, D.J.,
Obermeier, S.F., Olson, S.M., Green, R.A., 2005. Field occur- Norris, R.D., Pierazzo, E., Ravizza, G., Rebolledo-
rences of liquefaction-induced features: a primer for en- Vieyra, M., Reimold, W.U., Robin, E., Salge, T.,
gineering geologic analysis of paleoseismic shaking. Speijer, R.P., Sweet, A.R., Urrutia-Fucugauchi, J.,
Engineering Geology, 76, 209e234. Vajda, V., Whalen, M.T., Willumsen, P.S., 2010. The chic-
Osinski, G.R., Lee, P., Parnell, J., Spray, J.G., Baron, M., xulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Creta-
2005. A case study of impact-induced hydrothermal ac- ceous−Paleogene boundary. Science, 327, 1214e1218.
tivity: the Haughton impact structure, Devon Island, Ca- Seilacher, A., 1969. Fault-graded beds interpreted as seismi-
nadian High Arctic. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 40, tes. Sedimentology, 13, 155e159.
1859e1877. Shanmugam, G., 1985. Types of porosity in sandstones and
Pankow, K.L., Moore, J.R., Hale, J.M., Koper, K.D., their significance in interpreting provenance. In:
Kubacki, T., Whidden, K.M., McCarter, M.K., 2014. Zuffa, G.G. (Ed.), Provenance of Arenites. D. Reidel Pub-
Massive landslide at Utah copper mine generates wealth lishing Company, Holland, pp. 115e137.
of geophysical data. GSA Today, 24, 9. Shanmugam, G., 1988. Origin, recognition and importance
Parsons, T., Geist, E.L., Ryan, H.F., Lee, H.J., of erosional unconformities in sedimentary basins. In:
Haeussler, P.J., Lynett, P., Hart, P.E., Sliter, R., Kleinspehn, K.L., Paola, C. (Eds.), New Perspectives
Roland, E., 2014. Source and progression of a submarine in Basin Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York,
landslide and tsunami: the 1964 Great Alaska earthquake pp. 83e108.
at Valdez. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, Shanmugam, G., 1990. Porosity prediction in sandstones
119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011514. using erosional unconformities. In: Meshri, I.D.,
Pinto, J.A., Warme, J.E., 2008. Alamo Event, Nevada: crater Ortoleva, P.J. (Eds.), Prediction of Reservoir Quality
stratigraphy and impact breccia realms. In: Evans, K.R., through Chemical Modelling, vol. 49. AAPG Memoir,
Horton Jr., J.W., King Jr., D.T., Morrow, J.R. (Eds.), The pp. 1e23.
Sedimentary Record of Meteorite Impacts, vol. 437. Shanmugam, G., 2006a. Deep-water processes and facies
GSA Special Paper, pp. 99e137. models: implications for sandstone petroleum reservoirs.
Reid, H.F., 1910. Report of the State Investigation Commis- In: Handbook of Petroleum Exploration and Production,
sion. The Mechanics of the Earthquake, the California vol. 5. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 476.
Shanmugam, G., 2006b. The tsunamite problem. Journal of The Cretaceous−Tertiary Event and Other Catastrophes
Sedimentary Research, 76, 718e730. in Earth History, vol. 307. GSA Special Paper,
Shanmugam, G., 2008a. Deep-water bottom currents and pp. 151e182.
their deposits. In: Rebesco, M., Camerlenghi, A. (Eds.), Steer, P., Simoes, M., Cattin, R., Shyu, J.B.H., 2014. Erosion
Developments in Sedimentology, Chapter 5, Contourites, influences the seismicity of active thrust faults. Nature
vol. 60. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 59e81. Communications, 5, 5564.
Shanmugam, G., 2008b. The constructive functions of trop- Stoeffler, D., Artemieva, N.A., Ivanov, B.A., Hecht, L.,
ical cyclones and tsunamis on deepwater sand deposition Kenkemann, T., Schmitt, R.T., Tagle, R.A.,
during sea level highstand: implications for petroleum Wittmann, A., 2004. Origin and emplacement of the
exploration. AAPG Bulletin, 92, 443e471. impact formations at Chicxulub, Mexico, as revealed by
Shanmugam, G., 2012a. New perspectives on deep-water the ICDP deep drilling at Yaxcopoil-1 and by numerical
sandstones: origin, recognition, initiation, and reservoir modeling. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 39,
quality. In: Handbook of Petroleum Exploration and Pro- 1035e1067.
duction, vol. 9. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 524. Stover, C.W., Coffman, J.L., 1993. Seismicity of the United
Shanmugam, G., 2012b. Process-sedimentological chal- States, 1568−1989 (Revised). U.S. Geological Survey Pro-
lenges in distinguishing paleo-tsunami deposits. Natural fessional Paper 1527. United States Government Printing
Hazards, 63, 5e30. Office, p. 72, 101, 102.
Shanmugam, G., 2013a. Comment on “Internal waves, an Stuart, C.J., 1979. Lithofacies and origin of the San Onofre
underexplored source of turbulence events in the sedi- Breccia, coastal southern California. In: Stuart, C.J.
mentary record” by L. Pomar, M. Morsilli, P. Hallock, (Ed.), Miocene Lithofacies and Depositional Environ-
and B. Ba denas [Earth-Science Reviews, 111 (2012), ments, Coastal Southern California and Northwestern
56e81]. Earth-Science Reviews, 116, 195e205. Baja California: Pacific Section. Society of Economic Pa-
Shanmugam, G., 2013b. Modern internal waves and internal leontologists and Mineralogists, pp. 25e42.
tides along oceanic pycnoclines: challenges and implica- Sweeting, M.M., 1978. The karst of Kweilin, Southern China.
tions for ancient deep-marine baroclinic sands. AAPG Geographical Journal, 144, 199e204.
Bulletin, 97, 767e811. Tappin, D.R., Grilli, S.T., Harris, J.C., Geller, R.J.,
Shanmugam, G., 2015. The landslide problem. Journal of Masterlark, T., Kirby, J.T., Shi, F., Ma, G.,
Palaeogeography, 4, 109e166. Thingbaijam, K.K., Mai, P.M., 2014. Did a submarine land-
Shanmugam, G., 2016. The seismite problem. Journal of slide contribute to the 2011 Tohoku tsunami? Marine Ge-
Palaeogeography, 5, 318e362. ology, 357, 344e361.
Shanmugam, G., Higgins, J.B., 1988. Porosity enhancement Tappin, D.R., Watts, P., McMurtry, G.M., Lafoy, Y.,
from chert dissolution beneath Neocomian unconformity: Matsumoto, T., 2001. The Sissano, Papua New Guinea
Ivishak Formation, North Slope, Alaska. AAPG Bulletin, tsunami of July 1998 d Offshore evidence on the source
72, 523e535. mechanism. Marine Geology, 175, 1e23.
Shanmugam, G., Moiola, R.J., Sales, J.K., 1988. Duplex-like Tessier, B., Terwindt, J.H.J., 1994. Un exemple de
structures in submarine fan channels, Ouachita Moun- deformations synse dimentaires en milieu intertidal l’ef-
tains, Arkansas. Geology, 16, 229e232. fet du mascaret. Paris, Acade mie des Sciences Comptes
Shanmugam, G., Shrivastava, S.K., Das, B., 2009. Sandy Rendus, 319, 217e223.
debrites and tidalites of Pliocene reservoir sands in Thomas, T.M., 1970. Field meeting of the South Wales group
upper-slope canyon environments, Offshore Krishna−Go- on the Stack rocks to Bullslaughter Bay section of the
davari Basin (India): Implications. Journal of Sedimentary South Pembrokeshire coast. Proceedings of the Geolo-
Research, 79, 736e756. gists Association, 81, 241e248.
Shoemaker, E., 1983. Asteroid and comet bombardment of Tilling, R.I., Topinka, L., Swanson, D.A., 1990. Eruptions of
the Earth. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sci- Mount St. Helens: Past, Present, and Future. U.S.
ences, 11, 461e494. Geological Survey Special Interest Publication. U.S.
Sibson, R.H., 1977. Fault rocks and fault mechanisms. Geological Survey, Vancouver, WA, p. 56.
Journal of the Geological Society of London, 133, Tryggvason, E., 1973. Seismicity, earthquake swarms, and
191e213. plate boundaries in the Iceland region. Bulletin of the
Sibson, R.H., 1986. Brecciation processes in fault zones: in- Seismological Society of America, 63, 1327e1348.
ferences from earthquake rupturing. Pure and Applied USGS (U.S. Geological Survey), 2016. Earthquake Hazards
Geophysics, 124, 159e174. Program. Earthquake Glossary d Earthquake. http://
Simms, M.J., 2003. Uniquely extensive seismite from the earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/glossary/?term=earthquake
latest Triassic of the United Kingdom: evidence for bolide (Accessed 18 July 2016).
impact? Geology, 31, 557e560. Van Gosen, B.S., Wenrich, K.J., 1989. Ground Magnetom-
Smit, J., Roep, ThB., Alvarez, W., Montanari, A., Claeys, P., eter Surveys over Known and Suspected Breccia Pipes
Grajales-Nishimura, J.M., Bermudez, J., 1996. Coarse- on the Coconino Plateau, Northwestern Arizona. U.S.
grained, clastic sandstone complex at the Geological Survey Bulletin, 1683-C, p. 31.
Cretaceous−Paleogene (K−Pg) boundary (formerly Velasco-Villareal, M., Urrutia-Fucugauchi, J., Rebolledo-
known as the K−T boundary) around the Gulf of Mexico: Vieyra, M., Perez-Cruz, L., 2011. Paleomagnetism of
deposition by tsunami waves induced by the Chicxulub impact breccias from the Chicxulub crater d implica-
impact? In: Ryder, G., Gartner, S., Fastovsky, D. (Eds.), tions for ejecta emplacement and hydrothermal
44 G. Shanmugam
processes. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, and consideration of genetic models. In: Spencer, J.E.,
186, 154e171. Titley, S.R. (Eds.), Ores and Orogenesis: Circum-Pacific
Venzke, E., Wunderman, R.W., McClelland, L., Simkin, T., Tectonics, Geologic Evolution, and Ore Deposits, 22. Ari-
Luhr, J.F., Siebert, L., Mayberry, G., Sennert, S., 2002. zona Geological Society Digest, pp. 295e309.
Global Volcanism, 1968 to the Present, Global Volcanism West, M.E., Larsen, C.F., Truffer, M., O'Neel, S., LeBlanc, L.,
Program Digital Information Series, GVP-4. Smithsonian 2010. Glacier microseismicity. Geology, 38, 319e322.
Institution, Washington, D.C.. http://www.volcano.si. Williams, P.F., 1978. Karst research in China. British Cave
edu/reports/ Research Association Transactions, 5, 29e46.
Waite, G.P., Chouet, B.A., Dawson, P.B., 2008. Eruption dy- Woodcock, N.H., Miller, A.V.M., Woodhouse, C.D., 2014.
namics at Mount St. Helens imaged from broadband Chaotic breccia zones on the Pembroke Peninsula, south
seismic waveforms: interaction of the shallow magmatic Wales: evidence for collapse into voids along dilational
and hydrothermal systems. Journal of Geophysical faults. Journal of Structural Geology, 69, 91e107.
Research-Atmospheres, 113(B2). B02305. Woodcock, N.H., Omma, J.E., Dickson, J.A.D., 2006.
Walsh, P., Battiau-Queney, Y., Howells, S., Ollier, C., Chaotic breccia along the Dent Fault, NW England: implo-
Rowberry, M., 2008. The gash breccias of the Pembroke sion or collapse of a fault void? Journal of the Geological
Peninsula, SW Wales. Geology Today, 24, 137e145. Society London, 163, 431e446.
Warme, J.E., Morrow, J.R., 2009. Alamo Impact Breccia: Yao, Y., Wang, Q., Li, J., Shen, X., Kong, Y., 2013. Seismic
Ring Realm Processes and Products. Adapted from an hazard assessment of the three Gorges project. Geodesy
oral presentation at AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibi- and Geodynamics, 4, 53e60.
tion, Denver, Colorado, USA, June 7−10, 2009. Search and Zhang, Y., Person, M., Rupp, J., Ellett, K., Celia, M.A.,
Discovery Article #40494 (2010). Gable, C.W., Bowen, B., Evans, J., Bandilla, K.,
Warme, J.E., Sandberg, C.A., 1996. Alamo megabreccia. Mozley, P., Dewers, T., Elliot, T., 2013. Hydrogeologic
GSA Today, 6, 1e7. controls on induced seismicity in crystalline basement
Wenrich, K.J., Titley, S.R., 2008. Uranium exploration for rocks due to fluid injection into basal reservoirs. Ground-
northern Arizona (USA) breccia pipes in the 21st century water, 51, 525e538.
View publication stats

Pressed

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pressed

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pressed

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See

The fallacy of interpreting SSDS with different

Article · January 2017

SSDS and earthquakes View project

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

journal homepage: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-palaeogeography/

Multi-origin of soft-sediment deformation structures and seismites

The fallacy of interpreting SSDS with

E-mail address: shanshanmugam@aol.com.

3) Volcanic eruptions (Moran et al., 2008).

patient with stomach pain as “stomach disease”,

estuarine deposits because many of the mechanisms 3.9. Sea-level rise

continental margins may have increased more than

Conventionally, deep tectonic processes over a

Helwig, 1970; Kirkland and Anderson, 1970; Logan,

4.3. Volcanic breccias composed of broken, angular, pyroclastic fragments, is

Cantarell Oil Field, Mexico: In a rare case study,

2) Depositional breccias in marginal-marine environ- 2016). In this review, sedimentary-depositional and

Major differences among the ﬁve types of breccias

1) In general, meteorite breccias are distinguished by

I thank Prof. Zeng-Zhao Feng (Editor-in-Chief of the

View publication stats

You might also like