Discovery of Truth: A Critical Reflection On "Philosophy As The Handmaiden of Theology."
Discovery of Truth: A Critical Reflection On "Philosophy As The Handmaiden of Theology."
Discovery of Truth: A Critical Reflection On "Philosophy As The Handmaiden of Theology."
Marc M. Cataluña
Philosophy is derived from the Greek words φιλο and σοφία meaning “love of wisdom.”
Wisdom here means the knowledge of ultimate causes, explanations and principles. It includes
not just facts but skills and values for life. It creates a bigger picture of the world or “a world
view”. It deals with ultimate reality and questions of life. It answers questions like: What is the
meaning or goal of life? Why is there good and evil in the world? Are we truly free? Why is
there suffering in the world? How do we know things? Why do we die? Is there life after death?
These questions may be answered by a reasonable mind but philosophy digs deeper within the
The maxim that philosophy should serve as the handmaiden of theology was frequently
proclaimed by scholastic theologians in the Middle Ages. They expressed it in these terms:
Philosophia theologiae ancilla. The origin of the interpretation of the relationship between
philosophy and theology in terms of ‘servant’ or ‘mistress’ should first be put to mind. The
analysis, therefore, will be confined to the way in which this idea was represented and
transmitted in the writings of the four leading teachers of this school, namely Philo the Jew and
the Christians Clement, Origen and Didymus the Blind.1 Philosophy and theology, then, are then
placed in relation to each other, theology is given primary role over philosophy. This simply
means that the common knowledge of that time are more on Greek philosophy, especially the
1
site
Platonic concept of the human soul and the ethical system of the Stoics. With that, philosophy
I sometimes think of philosophy as the study of “higher things” and theology as the study
of the “highest things” which makes it inferior to philosophy.2 This may not be a kind
philosophy and I find it difficult to engage with philosophical problems like Can we really be
certain of something? Or Is evil in the world caused by God? In any case, these questions bug
me when I sleep at night. If I lived during the time of the philosophers, I would ask them “Why
must we know these things? Is it really necessary? Why not just let things be just the way they
are?
Relativists would argue that truth is relative. For them, truth and falsity, right and wrong,
standards of reasoning and procedures of justification are products of differing conventions and
framework of assessment and that the authority is confined to the context giving rise to them.3
Skeptics claim that nothing is certain. They hold that the possibility of certainty in
knowledge is questionable. It is not enough for one to believe because of belief but there must be
Pragmatist
2
3
Baghramian, Maria and Carter, J. Adam, ed. Edward N. Zalta, “Relativism”, in The Stanford Encyclopedia
of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition) accessed February 14, 2018,
(https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/relativism/)
Idealist
Theology is derived from the Greek words θεο and λογία meaning “the study/word4
of God.”
The idea of revelation was not clear during the first centuries of Christianity.