CORPORATION LAW

INTRODUCTION/CLASSIFICATION OF PRIVATE CORPORATIONS

 Union Glass vs. SEC, 126 SCRA 32

 Abejo vs. dela Cruz, 149 SCRA 654
 Magalad vs. Premier Financing Corporation, 209 SCRA 261
 CIR. vs. Club Filipino, Inc. de Cebu, 5 SCRA 321
 Manuel R. Dulay Enterprises. vs. CA, 225 SCRA 678
 NDC. V. Philippine Veterans Bank, 192 SCRA 257
 Pioneer Insurance vs. CA, 175 SCRA 668
FORMATION AND ORGANIZATION OF CORPORATION

 Philips Export BV. vs. CA, 206 SCRA 457

 Lyceum of the Phils. vs. CA, 219 SCRA 610
 P.C. Javier & Sons, Inc., et. at.,vs. CA, et. at., 462 SCRA 36
 Philippine first Insurance Company, Inc. vs. Hartigan, et. al., 74 SCRA
252
 Zuellig Freight vs. NLCR 701 SCRA 561
 Malabang vs. Benito, 27 SCRA 533
 Harril vs. Davis, 168 F. 187
 Hall vs. Piccio, 86 Phil 603
 Asia Banking Corporation vs. Standard Products Co., 46 Phil 145
 Cranson vs. International Business Machines Corporation, 200 A. 2d
33
 Salvattiera vs. Garlitos, et al., 103 Phil 757
 Chiang Kai Shek School vs. CA, 172 SCRA 389
 Lozano vs. delos Santos, 274 SCRA 452
 Lim Tong Lim vs. Phil. Fishing Gear Industries, Inc., 317 SCRA 728
 Intl Express Travel v. CA 343 SCRA 674
 Loyola Grand Villas Homeowners vs. CA, 276 SCRA 681
 Fleischer vs. Botica Nolasco, 47 Phil 583
 Government of the Philippines vs. El Hogar, 50 Phil 399
THE CORPORATE ENTITY

 Stockholders of F. Guanson and Sons, Inc. vs, Register of Deeds, 6 SCRA

373
 Caram vs. CA. 151 SCRA 638
  J,G. Summit Holdings, Inc. vs. CA, 450 SCRA 169
 Tramat Mercantile, Inc. vs. CA 238 SCRA 14
 Marvel Bldg. Corporation vs. David 94 Phil 376
 Palacio, et. al, vs. Fely Transportation Company, 5 SCRA 1011
 NAMARCO vs. Associated Finance Company, 19 SCRA 962
 Tan Boon vs. Jarencio, 163 SCRA 205
 Magsaysay-Labrador vs. CA. 180 SCRA 266
 Indo Phil Textile Mills vs. Calica , 205 SCRA 698
 Jacinto vs. CA, 198 SCRA 211
 Concept Builders, Inc. vs. NLRC, 257 SCRA 149
 Claparols vs. CIR, 65 SCRA 613
 Villa Rey Transit vs. Ferrer, 25 SCRA 845
 Secosa, et at vs. Heirs of Erwin Suarez Francisco, 433 SCRA 273
 Yu vs. NLRC, 245 SCRA 134
 Cease vs. CA, 93 SCRA 483
 Delpher Trades Corporation vs. CA, 157 SCRA 349
 Garnett vs. Southern Railway Company, 173 F. Suppl 915 (1959)
 Jardine Davies, Inc. vs. JRB Realty Inc, 463 SCRA 555
 Koppel (Phil.) Inc. vs. Yatco, 77 Phil 496
 Liddell vs. CIR, 2 SCRA 632
 La Campana Coffee Factory vs. Kaisahan, 93 Phil 160
 WPM International Trading vs. Labayen, 735 SCRA 297
 Tantongco vs. Kaisahan ng mga Manggagawa, 106 Phil 198
 Cruz vs. Dalisay, 152 SCRA 487
 NASECO Guards Association-PEMA vs. National Service Corporation,
629 SCRA 90
 Pacific Rehaus Corporation vs. CA, 719 SCRA 665
 Kukan International Corporation vs. Reyes, 631 SCRA 596
 PNB vs. Hydro Resources Contractors Corporation, 693 SCRA 294
 Macasaet vs. Co, Jr., 697 SCRA 187
 Aboitiz Equity Ventures, Inc. vs. Chiongbian , 729 SCRA 519
 Medical Plaza vs. Cullen, 709 SCRA 110
 Gamboa vs. Teves 652 SCRA 690 and 682 SCRA 397
 Narra Nickel Mining et al. vs. Redmont Consolidated Mines
Corporation, 722 SCRA 382
 Narra Nickel Mining et al. vs. Redmont Consolidated Mines
Corporation, GR195580, January 28, 2015

PROMOTER’S CONTRACT

 McArthur vs. Times Printing, 51 NW 216

 Cagayan Fishing vs. Sandiko, 65 Phil 223
  Builders Duralle v. Dunn, 17 SW 2d 715
 Rizal Light vs. PSC and Morong Electric, 25 SCRA 285
 Quaker Hill vs. Parr, 364 P. 2d 1056
 Old Dominion Copper Mining and Smelting Co. vs. Bigelow, 89 NE 193

CORPORATE POWERS

 RP vs. Acoje Mining, 7 SCRA 361

 Carlos vs. Mindoro Sugar Co, 57 Phil 343
 Republic vs. El Hogar, 50 Phil 399
 Nat’l Power Corp. vs. Vera, 170 SCRA 721
 Madrigal & Co. vs. Zamora, 151 SCRA 355
 Pirovano vs. De la Rama, 96 Phil 335
 Harden vs. Benguet, 58 Phil 141
 Stonehill vs. Diokno, 20 SCRA 383
 Bache & Co (Phils), Inc. vs. Ruiz , 37 SCRA 823
 Mambulao Lumber vs. PNB, 22 SRA 359
 LBC Express, Inc. vs. CA 236 SCRA 602
 ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp. vs. CA, 301 SCRA 589
 Filipinas Broadcasting Network vs. Ago Medical and Educational Center,
448 SCRA 413
 Bache & Co (Phils), Inc. vs. Ruiz 37 SCRA 823

CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF CORPORATION

 Ramirez s. Orientalist Co. & Fernandez, 38 Phil 634

 Lopez vs. Ericta, 45 SCRA 539
 Expert Travel & tours, Inc. vs. CA. 459 SCRA 147
 Citiban NA vs. Chua, 220 SCRA 75
 Prime White Cement vs. IAC, 220 SCRA 103
 Boyer-Roxas vs. CA, 211 SCRA 470
 EPG Construction vs. CA, 210 SCRA 210
 Bemguet Electric Cooperative vs. NLRC, 209 SCRA 55
 Woodchild Holdings, Inc. vs. Roxas Electric and Construction Company,
Inc. 436 SCRA 235
 Yu Chuk vs. Kong Li Po, 46 Phil 608
 Lapulapu Foundation, Inc. vs. CA, 421 SCRA 329
 Board of Liquidators vs. Heirs of Kalaw, 20 SCRA 987
 Advanced Papers vs. Arma Taders Corporation, 712 SCRA 313
 Cosare vs. Broadcom Asia, Inc. 715 SCRA 534
 Grace Christian High School vs. CA, 281 SCRA 133
 Zamboanga Transportation vs. Bachrach Motor, 52 Phil 244
 Board of SME Workers v. Tan 105 Phil 428
 Ponce et. al. Encamacion 94 Phil 81
  Detective & Protective Bureau vs. Cloribel, 26 SCRA 255
 Roxas vs. dela Ros, 49 Phil 609
 Angeles vs. Santos, 64 Phil 697
 Campbell vs. Leow, Inc. 134 A. 2d 852
 Dela Rama, et, al. vs. Ma-ao Sugar, 27 SCRA 247
 Gokongwei vs. SEC, 89 SCRA 336
 In Re: Giant Portland Cement, 21 A. 2d 697
 State of Washington Rel. Everett Trust vs. Pacific Waxed Paper, 157 P. 2d
707
 Alejandrino vs. De Leon, GR 49043 December 1943
 Everett vs. Asia Banking Corporation, 49 Phil 512
 Mackin vs. Nicollet Hotel , 25 F. 2d 783
 NIDC vs. Aquino, 163 SCRA 153
 Ringling vs. Ringling Bros.,49 A 2d 603
 E.K. Buck Retail Store vs. Harket, 62 NW 2d 288
 Clark vs. Dodge, 199 NE 641
 Gottschalk vs. Avalon Realty, 23 NW 2D 606
 Sherman & Ellis vs. Indiana Mutual, 41 F. 2d 588
 Benintendi vs. Kenton Hotel, 60 NE 2d 829
 Fua Cun vs. Summers, 44 Phil 705
 Baltazar vs. Lingayen Gulf, 14 SCRA 522
 Nava vs. Peers Marketing, 74 SCRA 65

DUTIES OF DIRECTORS AND CONTROLLING STOCKHOLDERS

 Otis & Co. vs Pennsylvania R. Co., et al, 61 F. SUPP. 905

 Montelibano, et, al, vs. Bacolod-Murcia Milling Co. Inc 5 SCRA 36
 Philippine Stock Exchange, Inc,. vs,. CA, 281 SCRA 232
 Litwin (Rosmarine, et, al.Interveners vsAllen, et, al, 25 N.Y.S. 2d 667
 Walker vs. Man, et, al, 253 NYS 458
 Steinberg vs. Velasco, 52 Phil 953
 Barnes vs. Andrews , 298 F. 614
 Pool vs. Pool, et, al 22 SO 2d 131
 Foster vs. Bowen, et al, 41 NE 2d 181
 Lowell Hoit & Co., vs Detig, et al,50 N.E. 2d 602
 Dates vs. Dresser, 251 US 524
 Palting vs. San Jose Petroleum, Inc., 18 SCRA 924
 Mead vs. E.C., McCulough, et al, 21 Pihl 95
 Piccard vs. Sperry Corporation, et al, 48 F. Suppl. 465
 Government of zthe Philippines vs. El Hogar Filipino, 50 Phil 399
 Barretto vs. La Previsora Filipina, 57 Phil 649
 Central Cooperative Exchange , Inc, Tibe,33 SCRA 593
 Fogelson vs. America Woolen Co., 170 F. 2D 560
  Kerb vs. California Eastern Airways, 90 A 2d 652
 Strong, et al vs. Guttierrez Repide, 41 Phil 927
 Taylor vs. Wright, 159 P. 2d 980
 Gokongwei vs. SEC, 89 SCRA 336
 Singer vs. Cartisle, 26 NYS 2d 172
 Irving Trust Co., vs, Deutsch, 73 F 2d 121
 Globe Co. vs. Utica Gas & Electric Co. 121 NE 378
 Insuranshare Corporation vs. Northern Fiscal, 35 F. Supp. 22

THE RIGHT OF NSPECTION

 W.G Philpotts vs. Philippine Manufactoring Co., and F.N. Berry , 40 Phil
471
 Pardo vs. Hercules Lumber Co., et al, 47 Phil 965
 Gonzales vs. PNB, 122 SCRA 489
 Veraguth vs. Isabela Sugar Co., 57 Phil 266
 Gkongwei vs. SEC. 89 SCRA 336
 Slay vs. Polonia Publishing Co., 229 NW 434
 Klein vs. Scranton Life Ins. Co et al., 11 A 2d 770
 Yujuico vs. Quiambao, 724 SCRA 262

DERIVATIVE SUITS

 Pascual vs. Orozco, 19 Phil 82

 Evangelista vs. Santos, 86 Phil 837
 Liken vs. Shaffer, et al., 64 F. Supp. 432
 Keenan vs. Eshleman, et al., 2 A 2d 904
 Otis & Co., vs. Eshleman, et al., 57 F. Supp. 680
 Republic Bank vs. cuaderno, 19 SCRA 671
 Reyes vs. Tan, 3 SCRA 198
 Chase vs. Court of First Instance of Manila, 18 SCRA 602
 Holmes vs. Camp, et al., 180 A 2d 409
 Gamboa vs. Victoriano, 90 SCRA 40
 San Miguel vs. Kahn, 176 SCRA 447
 Villamor, Jr. vs. umale, 736 SCRA 325
 Ang vs. Ang, 699 SCRA 272
 Cua, Jr. vs. Tan, 607 SCRA 648

FINANCING THE CORPORATION

 Ellingwood vs. Wolf’s Head Oil Refining Co., Inc, 38 A 2d 743

 Hay vs. Hay, 230 P. 2d 791
 Garcia v. Lim Chu Sing, 59 Phil 562
 Utah Hotel Co., vs. Madsen, 134 Pac 557
  Wallace vs. Eclipse Pocahontas Coal Company, et al., 98 SE 293
 Bayla vs. Silang Traffic Co.m Inc. 73 PHIL 557
 Datu Tagoranao Benito vs. SEC. 123 SCRA 722
 Stokes v. Continental Trust Co., 78 NE 1090
 Thom, et al, vs. Baltimore Trust Co., 138 A. 234
 Fuller vs. Krogh,113 NW 2d 25
 Dunlay vs. Avenue M. Garage & Repair Co., Inc, et al., 170 NE 917
 Ross Transport Inc., et al., vs. Crothers et, al., 45 A. 2d 267
 Meritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. vs. New York Trust Co., 184 F. 2d 954
 John Kelley Co., vs. Commissioner of Int. Revenue. 362 US 521
 Jordan Co. vs. Allen, Collector of Internal Revenue, 85 F. Sup. 437
 Aladdin Hotel Co. vs. Bloom, 200 F. 2d 627

CONSIDERATION FOR ISSUANCES OF SHARES

 Triplex Shoe Co., et al. vs. Rice & Hutchins, Inc. et al. 152 A 342
 McCarty vs. Langdeau, 337 SW 2d 407
 Rhode vs. Dock-Hop Co., et al., 194 P. 11
 Bing Krosby Minute Maid Corp. vs Eaton, Sr., 46 Cal 2d 484
 Velasco vs. Poizat, 37 Phil. 802
 Lingayen Gulf Electric Power Co., Inc vs. Baltazar, 93 Phil 404
 Miranda vs. Tarlac Rice Mill Co., Inc. G.R., 35961 (December 2, 1932)
 Da Silva vs. Aboitiz & Co.,Inc., 44 Phil. 601
 Lumanhan vs. Cura, et al., 59 Phil. 601
 Lumanian vs. Cura, et al., 59 Phil. 746
 Fua Cun vs. Summers and China Banking Corporation, 44 Phil. 705)
 Baltazar vs. Lingayen Gulf Electric Power Co., Inc. 14 SCRA 522
 Nava vs. Peers Marketing Corporation, 74 SCRA 65

DIVIDENDS PURCHASE BY CORPORATION OF SHARES

 Nielson & Company, Inc. vs. Lepanto Consolidated, 26 SCRA 540

 Berks Broadcasting vs. Cramer, 52 A. 2d 571
 Lich vs. United States Rubber Co., 39 F. Supp. 675
 Keough vs. St. Paul Milk co., 285 NV 809
 Dodge vs. Ford Motor Co., 170 NW 668
 Burk vs. Otawa Gas & Electric Co., 123 Pac 875
 McLaran vs. Crescent Planning , 93 SW 819
 Turner vs. Lorenzo Shipping Corporation, 636 SCRA 13

AMMENDMENTS TO CHARTER

 Marcus vs. RH, Macy, 74 NE 2d 228

 Philippine Trust Co. vs. Rivera, 44 Phil 469
TRANSFER OF SHARES

 Uson vs. Diomosoto, 61 Phil 535

 Escano vs. Filipinas Mining Corporation, 74 Phil 711
 Rivera vs. Florendo , 144 SCRA 647
 Nautica Canning Corp. vs Yumol, 473 SCRA 415
 Razon vs. IAC, 207 SCRA 235, 207 SCRA 234
 Rural Bank of Salinas vs. CA. 210 SCRA 511
 Santamaria vs. HSBC, 89 Phil 472
 Makati Sports Club, Inc. vs. Cheng, 621 SCRA 103
 Bitong vs. CA. 292 SCRA 503
 Torres vs. CA,. 278 SCRA 793
 SME Bank, Inc. vs. De Guzman, 707 SCRA 242

DISSOLUTION

 Financing Corporation of the Philippine vs. Teodore, 93 Phil 678

 RP vs. Bisaya Land Transportation Co., Inc., 81 SCRA 9
 Gonzales vs. Sugar Regulatory Adm., 174 SCRA 377
 Pepsi-Cola Products Philippines, Inc. vs. CA, 443 SCRA 580
 National Abaca & Other Fibers Corporation vs. Pore, 2 SCRA 989
 China Banking Corporation vs. Michelin & Cie, 58 Phil 261
 Republic vs. Marsman Development Company, 44 SCRA 418
 Tan Tiong Bio vs. CIR, 4 SCRA 986
 Aguirre II vs. FQB+7, Inc. 688 SCRA 242

CORPORATE COMBINATIONS

 Reyes et. al., vs Blouse, et. al. 91 Phil 305

 Edward J. Neil vs. Pacific Farms, 15 SCRA 415
 Bank of Commerce vs. Radio Philippines Network, Inc., 721 SCRA 520

FOREIGN CORPORATIONS

 Marshall-Wells Co., vs. Elser, 46 Phil 71

 Columbia Pictures vs. CA. 261 SCRA 144
 General Garments vs. Dir. Of Patents, 41 SCRA 50
 Le Chemise Lacoste vs. Fernandez, 129 SCRA 373
 Litton Mills vs. CA. 256 SCRA 696
 Mentholatum vs. Mangaliman, 72 Phil 524
  Agilent Technologies Singapore (Pte) Ltd. Vs. Integrated Silicon
Technology Philippines Corporation, 427 SCRA 593
 Merryl Lynch Futures, Inc. vs. CA, 211 SCRA 824
 Top Weld Manufacturing, Inc. vs. ECED, SA, 138 SCRA 118
 Antam Consolidated vs. CA, 143 SCRA 288
 Cargill, Inc. vs. Intra Strata Assurance Corporation, 615 SCRA 304

MISCELLANEOUS

 Barlin vs. Ramirez, 7 Phil 41

THE SECURITIES REGULATION CODE (R.A. No. 8799)

1. Powers and Functions of the SEC

(a) Regulatory
(b) Adjudicative

2. Securities

(a) Definition
(b) Registration
(c) Exempt Securities
(d) Exempt Transaction

3. Registration of Securities
4. Fraud, Manipulations, Insider Trading
5. Protection of Investor

(a) Tender Offer

(b) Disclosure Rules
(c) Proxy Solicitation

6. Civil and Criminal Liabilities