Electromagnetic Waves in Various Media
Electromagnetic Waves in Various Media
r·E = 0,
r·B = 0,
@B (2)
r⇥E = ,
@t
@E
r⇥B = µ0 ✏ 0
,
@t
where we have used the fact that for vacuum D = ✏0 E and B = µ0 H.
Applying the curl operator r⇥ to Ampere’s and Faraday’s laws we get,
1
@B
r ⇥ (r ⇥ E) = r(r · E) r2 E =r⇥( )
@t
@ @2E
= (r ⇥ B) = µ✏0 2 ,
@t @t (3)
@B
r ⇥ (r ⇥ B) = r(r · B) r2 B = r ⇥ (µ0 ✏0 )
@t
@ @2B
= (r ⇥ E) = µ0 ✏ 0 2 .
@t @t
Using r · E = 0 and r · B = 0, we get,
@2E 2 @2B
r2 E = µ0 ✏ 0 , r B = µ 0 ✏ 0 . (4)
@t2 @t2
Eq.4 are second-order equations for both E and B but E and B are decoupled.
Both these equations satisfy the three-dimensional wave equation,
1 @2f
r2 f = , (5)
v 2 @t2
where v is the velocity of the wave. Eq.5 suggests that the EM waves de-
scribed by Eq.4 travel at a velocity,
1
v=p = 3 ⇥ 108 m s 1
, (6)
µ0 ✏ 0
which is the velocity of light c.
Since an arbitrary wave-packet can be constructed by a suitable superposi-
tion of plane-waves, we can try solutions that are plane-waves travelling in the
(without loss of generality) z-direction,
(k ⇥ E0 )
B0 = . (9)
!
2
It’s important to get a feel for the numbers related to the frequencies (wave-
lengths) of the various parts of the electromagnetic spectrum (See Fig.1). For
instance, visible radiation extends roughly from 400 THz to 750 THz (400 nm
to 800 nm). Since E = h⌫ for a photon, another popular unit for describing
the energy and the closely-related frequency ⌫ is the electron-Volt (eV ) which
is obtained by dividing the energy of the photon by the electronic charge e. For
example, visible red corresponds to roughly 2 eV.
3
1 1
u(z, t) = (✏0 | E |2 + | B |2 ) (10)
2 µ0
For a monochromatic plane-wave the electric and magnetic contributions are
equal,
1
| B |2 = | E |2 , (11)
c2
and so we get,
4
1 p 1 I
P = = ✏0 E0 2 = , (18)
A t 2 c
which of course doubles if the material in question is perfectly reflecting.
D = ✏0 E + P = ✏0 ✏r E =, ✏E
1 1 1 (19)
H= B+M = B = H.
µ0 µ0 µr µ
Here both ✏ and µ are scalars, while in a more general non-isotropic material
they are described by a tensor.
The term homogenous refers to the fact that the material properties do not
vary from point to point in the material. Of course, real materials are made
of a collection of atoms and there is certainly a varying of electron density, for
example. For homogeneity to apply, the length scale of such a variation (⇠
nm) must be much smaller than the wavelength of the electromagnetic field
in question (⇠ µm).
For the linear, isotropic and homogenous case, the Maxwell’s equations re-
duce to:
r·E = 0,
r·B = 0,
@B (20)
r⇥E = ,
@t
@E
r⇥B = µ✏ .
@t
The only di↵erence between Eqs. 2 for the vacuum and Eqs. 20 for the linear,
isotropic and homogenous media is the prefactor µ✏.
Thus, the velocity of wave propagation v through a linear, homogenous ma-
terial moves at speed,
1 c
v=p = , (21)
µ✏ n
where n is the familiar refractive index of a material.
5
3 Reflection and Transmission at Normal Inci-
dence
Let us first consider the various boundary conditions at the interface that will
help us relate both the electric and magnetic fields right at the interface.
6
3.2 Tangential component (Ek )
7
3.3 Normal component (D? )
We can calculate the surface integral in Eq. 29 over the flat ends (S1 and
S2 ) and the curved part (S3 ) via,
Z Z Z
D · dS + D · dS + D · dS = ⇢S A. (30)
S1 S2 S3
8
3.4 Tangential component (Hk )
9
We now consider an interface between two linear, homogenous media labelled
as 1 and 2 as shown in Fig. 3.4 and write out the terms for incident (I) E and
B fields,
10
Further, we can calculate the reflection coefficient R and the transmission
coefficient T as,
✓ ◆2
IR E0R 2 n1 n2
R= =( ) = ,
II E0I n1 + n2
(41)
IT E0T 2 4n1 n2
T = =( ) = .
II E0I (n1 + n2 )2
Clearly, R + T = 1, as expected from energy conservation.
Now let us consider that the incoming wave (EI ) impinges on the surface at
at an oblique angle as shown Fig. 4. Following a similar procedure as for the
case of normal incidence above, but after much more algebra we get,
11
p
cos(✓T ) 1 [(n1 /n2 ) sin ✓I ]2
↵= =
cos(✓I ) cos(✓I )
µ1 v1
= ,
µ2 v2
(42)
↵
E0R = ( )E0I (Fresnel’s equation),
↵+
2
E0T = ( )E0I (Fresnel’s equation).
1+
There is an angle (✓B ), called the Brewster’s angle at which the reflected
wave is completely absent (See Fig. 4) and is given by:
2
1
sin2 (✓B ) = 2 2
(43)
(n1 /n2 )
Further, we can calculate the reflection coefficient R and the transmission
coefficient T as,
✓ ◆2
IR E0R 2 ↵
R= =( ) = ,
II E0I ↵+
✓ ◆2 (44)
IT E0T 2 2
T = =( ) =↵ ,
II E0I ↵+
12
that are plotted in Fig. 4.
r·D = ⇢,
r·B = 0,
@B (45)
r⇥E = ,
@t
@D
r⇥H = .J +
@t
Since we are now dealing with a conductor we invoke the well-known Ohm’s
Law (J = E) that describes a material property and is often a good phe-
nomenological description of material behaviour particularly at low values of
electric field E. Thus, we can rewrite Maxwell’s equations above in Eqs. 46 as,
⇢
r·E = .
✏
r·B = 0,
@B (46)
r⇥E = ,
@t
@E
r⇥B = µ( E + ✏ ).
@t
Using the equation of continuity,
@⇢
r·J + = 0, (47)
@t
13
and Ohm’s Law we get for a linear, homogenous material,
@⇢
= (r · E) = ⇢, (48)
@t ✏
from which it follows,
( /✏)t
⇢(t) = exp ⇢(t = 0). (49)
Eq. 49 states that the charge density ⇢(t) dissipates exponentially with a
time-constant ⌧ = ✏ . For a good conductor, its conductivity may be consid-
ered extremely large, and taking the limit ! 1, ⌧ ! 0 and therefore the
charge density ⇢(t) quickly diminishes to zero. In the steady-state where all the
free charges have reached the surface of the conductor we can again rewrite the
Maxwell’s equtions as,
r·E = 0,
r·B = 0,
@B (50)
r⇥E = ,
@t
@E
r⇥B = µ( E + ✏
).
@t
After applying the curl operator to Ampere’s and Faraday’s Law above we
get a modified wave equation for E and B:
@2E @E
r2 E = µ✏
+µ ,
@t2 @t (51)
@2B @E
r2 B = µ✏ 2 + µ .
@t @t
These still admit plane wave solution of the form:
e
E(z, t) = E0 expi(kz !t)
,
e
(52)
B(z, t) = B0 expi(kz !t)
,
where,
e
k = k + i,
r r !1/2
✏µ ⇣ ⌘2
k=! 1+ +1
2 ✏! (53)
r r !1/2
✏µ ⇣ ⌘2
=! 1+ 1 .
2 ✏!
14
z i(kz !t)
E(z, t) = E0 e e ,
z i(kz !t)
(54)
B(z, t) = B0 e e ,
where E0 = E0 ei E and B0 = B0 ei B are complex.
The skin depth d = 1/ denotes the distance required to attenuate to 1/e of
its original value, and describes how far the wave penetrates into the conductor.
The real part of ek k determines wavelength, the propagation speed, and the
index of refraction as:
2⇡
, =
k
!
v= , (55)
k
ck
n= .
!
While both the fields E and B remain transverse to the direction of wave
propagation k̂, they do not remain in phase with each other.
Expressing e k as a complex number ek = Kei we can show that,
s r
p ⇣ ⌘2
K =| ek |= k 2 + 2 = ! ✏µ 1 + . (56)
✏!
= arctan(/k).
Kei
B0 ei B
E0 e i E ,
= (57)
!
and comparing the imaginary part of the above equation we find that,
B E= . (58)
On the other hand, the real part of Eq. 57 implies that
s r
B0 K ⇣ ⌘2
= = ✏µ 1 + . (59)
E0 ! ✏!
15
6 Dispersion and Group Velocity
6.1 Dispersion
that is simply a sum of plane waves eikx each with amplitude A(k).
Now, let’s propagate these waves through time t. This works by simply
propagating each wave A(k)eikx by a phase factor of e i!t . Here ! is also
centred around a frequency !0 = !(k0 ). This gives us,
Z 1
a(x, t) = dkA(k)eikx !t . (61)
1
16
@!(k)
!(k) ⇡ !0 + |k=k0 (k k0 ) (62)
@k
This leads to rewriting Eq. 63 as,
Z 1
@!(k)
a(x, t) = eik0 x !0 t dkA(k)ei(k k0 )(x @k t) . (63)
1
@!(k)
vg = . (64)
@k
17