Peru Activity Based Costing
Peru Activity Based Costing
Peru Activity Based Costing
ASSURANCE
PROJECT
O P E R A T I O N S R E S E A R C H R E S U LT S
Application of Activity-Based
Costing (ABC) in a Peruvian
NGO Healthcare System
Center for Human Services • 7200 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 600 • Bethesda, MD 20814 -4811 • USA
The Quality Assurance Project (QAP) is funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development, under
Contract Number HRN-C-00-96-90013. QAP serves countries eligible for USAID assistance, USAID
Missions and Bureaus, and other agencies and nongovernmental organizations that cooperate with USAID.
QUALITY The QAP team, consists of the Center for Human Services (CHS), the prime contractor; Joint Commission
ASSURANCE International (JCI); Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health (JHSPH), Johns Hopkins
University Center for Communication Programs (JHU/CCP); and the Johns Hopkins Program for
PROJECT International Education in Reproductive Health (JHPIEGO). Together, they provide comprehensive, leading-
edge technical expertise in the design, management, and implementation of quality assurance programs in
TEL (301) 654-8338
developing countries. The Center for Human Services, the nonprofit affiliate of University Research Co., LLC,
FAX (301) 941-8427
provides technical assistance in the research, design, management, improvement, and monitoring of health
www.qaproject.org systems and service delivery in over 30 countries.
OPERATIONS RESEARCH RESULTS
Application of Activity-Based
Abstract
Costing (ABC) in a Peruvian
This paper describes the application
NGO Healthcare System
of activity-based costing (ABC) to cal-
culate unit costs for a healthcare or-
ganization in a developing country. It
also describes the ways in which
these calculations can provide infor-
mation for improving the efficiency
and quality of healthcare services. Table of Contents
The study was conducted from June
1, 1997 through May 31, 1998 at the
MaxSalud Institute for High Quality
Health Care, a nongovernmental, I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1
nonprofit healthcare provider in
Chiclayo, Peru. At that time, Departments in the MaxSalud Study ................................................................ 1
MaxSalud consisted of a manage- A. Activity-Based Costing Versus Traditional Costing ....................................... 2
ment support unit (MSU) and one
clinic in each of the communities of
Balta and Urrunaga. II. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................. 2
Methodology
The design of the study had two ma- IV. CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION ................................................................... 8
jor components: (a) development and
implementation of an activity-based
REFERENCES ......................................................................................................... 9
costing model and (b) evaluation of
the results and usability of the model.
SUGGESTED READINGS ........................................................................................ 9
Results
The ABC model and its associated
methodology were successfully
implemented. Unit costs, including
reasonable allocations of overhead
Continued on page ii
Abstract Continued Acknowledgements
and other indirect support costs to spe- This paper was written by Hugh Waters, Hany Abdallah, Diana
cific services, were shown to represent Santillán, and Paul Richardson. The authors gratefully acknowl-
a more accurate estimate of the full unit edge the collaboration and support of the staff at MaxSalud,
cost of services than traditional account- including, the invaluable input of Dr. Filiberto Hernandez, MaxSalud
ing methods. Used together with infor- project director; Dr. Roberto Villanes, executive director and
mation on the volume of services, ABC principal MaxSalud counterpart; and the members of the ABC
analysis can guide pricing and identify Implementation Team: Fabiola Aguilar, Carlos Vidaurre, Isidorro
the level of subsidies and cross-subsi- Benites, Maria Ester Inca, and Lucho Casteñedas.
dies required to sustain services. ABC
Mr. Greg Haladay contributed to the design of this operational
also opens up opportunities for cost
investigation. Technical input and feedback were provided by
savings through quality improvement of
Edward Kelley, Paula Tavrow, and Bart Burkhalter, QAP;
service delivery through the redesign or
Barbara Janowitz, Family Health International; and David Bishai,
reduction of non-value-added activities
Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Department of
and the identification of areas with po-
International Health.
tential process inefficiencies.
Conclusions
Applying ABC to healthcare services in Recommended citation
a developing-country setting is both
Waters, H., H. Abdallah, D. Santillán, and P. Richardson. 2000.
feasible and useful. The ABC analysis
Application of activity-based costing (ABC) in a Peruvian NGO
shows where an organization is
healthcare system. Operations Research Results 1(3). Published
spending its money, the difference
for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) by the
between production costs and
Quality Assurance Project (QAP): Bethesda, Maryland.
support costs, and which costs are
value-added and non-value-added.
Keywords
activity-based cost analysis, applica-
tion of; cost and quality management;
value-added; non-value-added; cost
analysis in developing countries; unit
costs; hospital costing; pricing of
healthcare services.
Application of Activity-Based
Costing (ABC) in a Peruvian
NGO Healthcare System
Hugh Waters, Hany Abdallah, Diana Santillán, and Paul Richardson
1 The project was implemented by University Research Co., LLC (URC) and Clapp & Mayne.
2 The only products the clinics provide are those sold in their pharmacies. MaxSalud pays for these items and then sells them to healthcare
clients, generating some revenue in the process. Thus, in this study, the associated costs of these products were treated as pass-through costs
and are not included in the analyses.
3 For example, the unit cost of a dental consultation includes not just the cost of the dentist’s time and the equipment and materials consumed,
but also overhead costs (such as electricity and administrative support) and support activities (such as cleaning and equipping the consultation
room).
4 A simple example: Imagine a company that produces 900 blue cars and 100 red cars each year. Traditional accounting procedures would
assign 90 percent of the overhead costs to the blue cars. ABC, however, might find that blue cars consume only 60 percent of the company’s
personnel time because red cars are more specialized and fewer are produced. ABC, therefore, would assign only 60 percent of the costs
related to supporting personnel to the blue cars, thereby showing a more accurate unit cost for both blue and red cars.
Balta Urrunaga
Number Number
Unit of Paying Unit of Paying
Selected Services Cost Fee Difference Clients Cost Fee Difference Clients
Ambulatory Services
General medical consultation 8.16 5.50 (2.66) 7,963 13.40 2.39 (11.01) 4,054
Gynecology consultation 8.57 7.35 (1.22) 2,040 n/a n/a n/a —
Pediatric consultation 8.16 7.35 (0.81) 2,201 n/a n/a n/a —
Net revenue (loss) in service area ($25,453) ($44,634)
Dentistry
Root canal 37.04 49.30 12.26 105 n/a n/a n/a —
Complex dental caries 6.69 12.03 5.34 1,110 18.79 6.99 (10.19) 113
Dental consultation 3.64 2.20 (1.44) 1,716 50.57 1.49 (49.08) 25
Simple dental caries 9.49 8.94 (0.55) 1,296 18.15 5.97 (12.18) 154
Simple dental extraction 4.01 4.19 0.18 1,022 11.80 3.97 (7.83) 592
Dental cleaning 13.27 7.35 (5.92) 308 17.72 5.50 (12.72) 20
Complex dental extraction 167.60 9.19 (158.41) 7 n/a n/a n/a —
Net revenue (loss) in service area ($1,283) ($9,144)
Preventive Care
Women’s health consultation 2.77 3.68 0.91 2,521 3.51 1.84 (1.67) 2,346
Healthy child consultation 2.54 1.47 (1.07) 3,689 4.02 0.92 (3.10) 1,641
Immunization 1.44 Free (1.44) 3,889 1.30 Free (1.30) 7,014
Net revenue (loss) in service area ($7,253) ($18,123)
Emergency Services
Emergency consultation 7.09 7.35 0.26 4,158 16.54 4.40 (12.14) 242
Transport of patient 34.45 27.57 (6.88) 223 n/a n/a n/a —
Observation of patient (6 hours) 16.00 4.40 (11.60) 354 n/a n/a n/a —
Delivery 187.30 45.11 (142.19) 268 n/a n/a n/a —
Net revenue (loss) in service area ($42,666) ($2,938)
Community Participation
Community participation visit 4 Free (4) 2,111 5.08 Free (5.08) 2,739
Net revenue (loss) in service area ($8,444) ($13,914)
OVERALL NET REVENUE ($82,534) ($88,754)
G. Requirements for
Implementing ABC
Among the most important require-
E. Standard Cost Analysis large part due to the different menus ments for implementing ABC are: (a)
of services. In Balta, the largest share access to both data and to personnel
Some of the traditional cost analyses
of costs (31 percent) was generated and (b) complementary accounting
conducted with financial data are also
by the emergency department, and management information sys-
possible using ABC. ABC, for ex-
representing 14 percent of Balta’s tems. Assuring clinical staff that the
ample, clearly records total costs for
client base. Ambulatory consultation activity interviews, which took from
the whole organization that can be
(including pediatric, gynecological, one to two hours, were in no way
compared with total revenues to
and general medical consultation) was related to an evaluation of perfor-
determine the overall financial status
the second highest cost generator in mance proved to be an important
of the company. For MaxSalud, total
Balta (20 percent) and the highest in factor in getting information. Obtaining
costs for the one-year period were
Urrunaga (26 percent). information concerning time spent on
$299,000 (Version 1), $535,000
non-value-added activities was
(Version 2), $334,000 (Version 3), One significant cost center in
nonetheless difficult because staff are
and $640,000 (Version 4). The Urrunaga was community participa-
typically reluctant to suggest that they
organization’s total costs can also be tion, which represented 12 percent of
spend substantial time on non-value-
reported by cost category and by costs, more than twice that in Balta (5
added activities. Consequently, figures
department. percent). This finding reflects the
obtained for non-value-added costs
greater emphasis placed on commu-
Cost by cost categor y. In all are probable underestimations of the
nity participation in Urrunaga. How-
versions, human resource costs real costs. Alternative approaches for
ever, because community participation
represented the most significant analyzing activities—such as time
does not generate revenue directly, its
category of costs. Salaries and other studies and focus groups—could be
costs must be covered by a separate
personnel costs varied from 70 explored (Player and Keys 1995).
source of funding or revenue. (Costs
percent of total costs under Version 1
associated with community participa- ABC needs production and utilization
to 84 percent under Version 4.
tion may be considered investments in information on the services to be
Cost by depar tments.Generally, future clients seeking healthcare costed. These figures are the denomi-
the division of costs by department services, thereby generating future nators for the unit-cost calculations at
was quite different in the two clinics, in revenue streams to the clinic.) MaxSalud. Production figures for paid
5 Another potential source of production information would be the provider’s register, which captures the number of services rendered by a
provider, including free follow-up consultations.
6 To maintain ABC at MaxSalud, key personnel will require training in the ABC methodology and software. Practical guides for the implementation
of ABC management are Brimson 1991; Kaplan and Cooper 1998; Pryor and Sahm 1998; O’Guin 1991; and Storfjell and Jessup 1996.
Sabin, P., T. Meyer, and W. Von Ehren. 1989. The cost of Wodchis, W.P. 1998. Applying activity-based costing in long-
quality assurance: An exploratory study. Hospital Topics term care. Healthcare Management Forum 11(4):25–32.
67(6):28–34.
Wolfe, N., and T. Helminiak. 1993. The anatomy of cost
Turney, P. 1993. Common Cents: The ABC Performance estimates—The “other outcome.” Advances in Health
Breakthrough. Portland, OR: Cost Technology. Economics and Health Services Research 14.