PGRC Report
PGRC Report
PGRC Report
OF THE
PAY GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL CELL
S.KRISHNAN, I.A.S.,
SECRETARY (EXPENDITURE)
CHAIRMAN
M. SHANTHI
ADDITIONAL SECRETARY
MEMBER
P. UMANATH, I.A.S.,
JOINT SECRETARY
MEMBER
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3. COMMON CATEGORIES 35
4. SECRETARIAT 36—40
5. GOVERNOR’S HOUSEHOLD 41
6. AGRICULTURE 42—45
8. AGRICULTURAL MARKETING 51
26 FISHERIES 93—95
INTRODUCTION
implementing the revised pay scales to its employees based on the recommendations
of the Sixth Central Pay Commission, constituted an Official Committee to examine and
make necessary recommendations for the implementation of revised scales of pay and
allowances for State Government employees and teachers. The Official Committee
revised pay scales on a ‘‘Pay Scale to Pay Scale Basis’’. Accordingly, orders were
Thiru Rajeev Ranjan, I.A.S., the then Principal Secretary to Government, Commercial
any, consequent on the implementation of the revised scales of pay, in the method of
dated: 26--8--2010 revising the pay scales of various categories in each department.
The implementation of the One Man Commission report led to several further claims
and representations from other departments officials and associations. The key issue
which arose related to the Pay Band and Grade Pay granted to Assistant Engineers and
2
Agriculture Officers. The Tamil Nadu Veterinary Assistant Surgeons and Tamil Nadu
Fisheries Department Officers’ Association demanded for equivalence for the posts of
consequential revision of its first, second and third level promotion posts. This demand
was considered by Government and in turn lead to demands for placing the posts of
par with the Joint Directors / Principals of Indian Medicine. These orders led to
discontent among the employees and associations due to disturbance of the prevailing
horizontal relativities and the plea to extend the pay scale of Joint Director of Agriculture
viz. Pay Band-IV Rs.37400--67000 + G.P. Rs.8700 to Joint Directors in all the other
Registrars and Joint Commissioners was made. There was also a strong demand to
place Tahsildars, Block Development Officers on par with Assistant Engineers in Pay
Band--III.
recommendations of the One Man Commission and found that it was not justifiable to
place Assistant Engineers on par with Group-I direct recruitment posts and therefore
downgraded the Grade Pay granted to Assistant Engineers one level below the Group-I
posts and restored the other posts of Assistant Executive Engineers / Executive
Agriculture / Fisheries to their original level prior to the revision made. Consequent on
the recommendation of the One Man Commission, 2010. Revision of pay scales made
3
by the One Man Commission in respect of certain categories which were placed in Pay
Band—III and Pay Band—IV were also brought down to their original level.
dated: 26--2--2011. In the said orders, Government has also constituted a Pay
Grievance Redressal Cell to examine the grievances, if any received from the
employees and to submit its report to Government within a period of three months.
employees associations and individual employees filed Writ Petitions and obtained an
26—2--2011. Due to the ‘’Interim Stay’’ granted by the Hon’ble High Court, the Pay
Grievance Redressal Cell constituted to redress the pay grievance could not function
5) The Hon’ble High Court, in its order dated: 08—3—2012 in a batch of Writ
Petitions Nos. 7006 of 2011 etc, made a detailed review of the cases and dismissed
the Writ Petitions with a direction to the Government to re-constitute the Pay Grievance
Redressal Cell within a period of four weeks to hear the grievances of all affected
persons including the writ petitioners. Subsequently, based on the Writ Appeal filed by
the petitioners in W.A.Nos. 504, 505, 514, 515 and 516 of 2012, the Hon’ble Division
Bench of the Madras High Court in its order dated: 27—3—2012 has granted “Interim
Stay” on the operation of the learned Single Judge’s orders (and hence on the operation
para-32 of the operative portion of the order viz. constitution of the Pay Grievance
Redressal Cell.
4
2) Thiru M. Padmanabhan,
Additional Secretary to Government .. as …..... Member and
(i) The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell shall examine all the representations so
far received and also further representations if any, from the Employees Associations /
(ii) The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell shall make specific recommendations to
(iii) The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell shall submit its report to Government
his place vide orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.261, Finance (Pay Cell) Department,
dated:17—7—2012.
8) As the Committee required some more time to process and finalise the report,
the tenure of the Committee was extended for a further period of three months beyond
09--7--2012 and then extended upto 31--10--2012. (vide. G.O.Ms.No.261, Finance (Pay
5
Grievance Redressal Cell), dated:17--7--2012 and G.O.Ms. No. 376, Finance (Pay
9) The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell has received a total number of 4376
employees and some of the Heads of Departments. The Committee conducted personal
hearings from 09--7--2012 to 11--7--2012 and also on 16--8--2012 and about 289
made their representations in person (Annexure-I). The Committee found that the
individual petitioners including the Writ Petitioners very useful to understand their
grievances and suggestions and to assess the genuiness of such grievances. The
10) The Committee hearings were held in the Conference Hall of the Tamil Nadu
State Council for Higher Education (TANSCHE), Chennai--5. The hearings could be
held smoothly and this was possible due to the unstinted co-operation of the Vice
Chairperson and the officers of TANSCHE. for which the Committee records its deep
gratitude.
11) The Committee also wishes to place on record its appreciation of the yeoman
service rendered by the officers and supporting staff of the Committee, in particular,
their assistance in examining complicated issues backed in the light of relevant data
and various back records which paved the way for the successful completion of this
task. The list of officers and the staff members of the Committee is annexed to this
6
report. Each of them worked late hours with utmost sincerity and devotion and
12) The Committee has examined the representations and grievances received
and has made recommendations after careful consideration for the removal of various
anomalies both vertical and horizontal. Based on a careful analysis of all the
representations received and grievances and views aired before the Committee, broadly
GENERAL ISSUES
Nadu Government Office Assistant and Basic Servants Central Association, Finance
Association, Tamil Nadu Government Aided School Office Staff Association, Tamil
Active Society for Ministerial Staff, Tamil Nadu Government Department Drivers
Central Association, Tamil Nadu Government Retired Officials Association and various
individual petitioners, Writ Petitioners and Chief Minister’s Special Cell Petitioners have
issues listed below. These issues have been examined and suitable recommendations
It has been represented that the fitment benefit of 1.86 should be extended to the
through Employment Exchanges for whom recruitment procedure had already been
completed including certificate verification before 1-6-2009, but orders were issued on
the concerned administrative authority. The pay revision in G.O. Ms. No. 234, Finance
(Pay Cell) Department, dated: 1-6-2009, fitment benefit was made applicable to persons
who were in service as on 1--1--2006 and was extended to the persons appointed
between 1--1--2006 to 31--5--2009 by G.O. Ms. No. 258, Finance (Pay Cell) dated:
23--6--2009. Based on the representations received, the One Man Commission had
recommended that this benefit be extended to the Junior Assistants and Agricultural
administrative reasons. Accordingly, orders have been issued in G.O. Ms. No.340,
Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26.8.2010. Now, the Service Associations and
several individual petitioners have represented to extend the fitment benefit to the
persons who have been recruited after 1-6-2009 also on the grounds that their
recruitment procedure completed before 31-5-2009 but appointment orders were issued
view that if further extension of this benefit would not be appropriate as the issue can
logically taken back to the date on which vacancies arose. The Government is within its
9
rights to review its requirement of staff and have them join on an appropriate date.
Government should be a model employer and hence should not follow two different
initial pay fixations for the same category between those who joined on or before
results in the gross emoluments in the revised scale being less than in the pre-revised
scale of pay as notified in the advertisement. Hence, it has been requested that
entry into Government service. In this connection, the Committee observes that the
employees appointed after 1—6—2009 are directly appointed in the revised scale of
pay and hence computing the revised pay with reference to the pre-revised basic pay
does not arise. Hence, the Committee recommends that the present status may be
Alternatively, it has been represented before the Committee to grant higher start
1–6--2009 to address the disparity in pay between the employees appointed before
1—6—2009 and after 1-6-2009. It is observed that higher start of pay has been
allowed in Government of India for new recruits entered into Government Service after
implementation of the Sixth Central Pay Commission for which separate elevated scales
10
of pay have been introduced for direct recruitment posts. Neither the Official Committee
2009 nor the One Man Commission 2010 has accepted the recommendations of the
Sixth Central Pay Commission on grant of higher start of pay for the direct recruits
considering the huge financial implications. The Committee finds that the new entrants
have been appropriately placed at the initial stage of the Pay Band plus the Grade Pay
admissible. Hence, the Committee endorses the stand of the Official Committee,2009
and One Man Commission,2010 on the higher start of pay to the new entrants
represented that they have been promoted as Deputy Tahsildar during May 2009 but
relieved belatedly on or after 1—6--2009 by the authorities and in some cases they
were relieved from the old post before 1-6-2009 but joined duty on or after1—6—2009,
while their juniors joined in the promotion post before 1—6--2009. Several individuals
who were promoted on or after 1—6--2009 have represented that the crucial date for
the panels in which they were included related to the earlier years but the panels were
drawn late. They request that the 1.86 fitment benefit be extended to such persons as
well on the grounds that they would have acted in the promotional post had the panels
been drawn on crucial dates as scheduled. The Committee finds that Government
Orders implementing the revised scales of pay has been issued on 1—6—2009.
Hence, the employees promoted between 1—1—2006 and 31—5—2009 were left with
the option either to fix their pay in the lower post with effect from 1—1—2006 and then
be granted the benefit of one increment in the promotion post or to directly to opt for the
11
revised pay scale with effect from the date of their promotion. However, this benefit
scales to Selection Grades / Special Grades / Super Grade (one bonus increments for
promotional chances for several posts; to grant Pay Band + GP of next promotional
posts for Selection Grade/ Special Grade and to adopt Assured Career Progression as
in Government of India and to relax the condition of 30 years in the same post for
granting Bonus increment. It is observed that the Selection Grade/ Special Grade
system was introduced to alleviate the stagnation in a post and to provide an avenue
for monetary benefit to those for whom there were no promotional chances. Further, it
is noticed that the scheme of Selection Grade / Special Grade is not available in
Government of India, the scheme of Assured Career Progression (ACP) except for
Sixth Central Pay Commission has recommended for continuing the existing scheme of
ACP with two financial upgradations, the Government of India has accepted the
recommendations with the modification that there will be three upgradations under ACP
scheme after 10, 20 and 30 years of service with the same benefit of pay fixation
available at the time of normal promotion for ACP with 3% increment. The Official
Committee, 2009 has recommended one increment benefit of 3% on basic (Pay in the
Pay Band + Grade Pay) for award of Selection Grade / Special Grade on completion of
12
2010 corresponding Selection Grade / Special Grade scales of pay were appended in
08-11--2010. This concession of Selection / Grade / Special Grade scales of pay was
extended to employees who opt to come over to the revised scale of pay on the date of
foregoing the arrears upto the date of award of Selection Grade / Special Grade
1—6--2009 are uniformly granted the benefit of one increment equivalent to 3% of basic
pay (Pay + Grade Pay). The Committee finds justification that Selection Grade / Special
rendered by them in the same post. The Committee does not favour granting the Pay
Band and Grade Pay of the promotion post for Selection Grade and Special Grade
since this would give uneven benefit to employees existing in the same pay scale in
recommends that an additional increment benefit (over and above the one increment
award of Selection Grade/ Special Grade in the revised scale of pay with effect from
option from the employees. The Committee is of the view that there is no justification in
the request for implementation of Assured Career Progression Scheme in view of the
13
22B while fixing pay on promotion to higher posts in the previous pay commissions,
which has been replaced by 3% in the revised scale of pay from 1.1.2006. The
Committee finds that the 3% benefit calculated on basic pay (pay plus grade pay drawn
in the lower post) plus difference in Grade Pay entitled for higher post and the benefit
will naturally be more than a 5% benefit. Hence, the Committee finds no justification to
change the existing system of grant of 3% of basic pay (pay plus grade pay) in the lower
post plus difference in Grade Pay between the lower and the higher post or promotion
Several Teacher’s Associations have requested that Rule 4(3) as available in the
Tamil Nadu Revised Scales of Pay Rules, 1998 may be reviewed and to permit
revision of pay in the lower post and then in the promotional post consequent on
revision of the scale of the pay of the lower post with corresponding Selection Grade/
Special Grade in the pre-revised scales. For example, a Selection Grade / Special
Grade Lab Assistant promoted as Junior Assistant/ Typist before 1-1-2006 gets revision
of pay in the promotional post in Pay Band-1 only while some other Selection Grade/
Special Grade Lab Assistants promoted between 1.1.2006 and 31-5-2009 get revision
14
in the post of Selection Grade/ Special Grade Lab Assistant in Pay Band-2 and then get
their pay fixed in the promotional post to get higher pay. Several individual petitioners
who were promoted to a post before getting Selection Grade in a lower post on or
before 1.1.2006 get less than their juniors who got promotion after getting Selection/
Special Grade. And in certain cases, it is represented that seniors promoted to a post
from Selection Grade/ Special Grade before 31.12.2005 get less than their juniors who
got promotion after 1.1.2006 but before 31.5.2009 consequent on elevation of scale of
pay of the feeder category and corresponding Selection/ Special Grades and
introduction of additional fitment table in Letter No.51082/ Pay Cell / 2010--1, dated:
under Rule 5 of the Tamil Nadu Revised Scales of Pay Rules, 2009 provide for
rectifying the anomaly of a Junior getting more pay than a Senior consequent on
implementation of the revised scales of pay and caused exercising of option by the
junior at a later date. Further, in the revised pay structure there are no separate scales
of pay granted to Selection Grade / Special Grade posts. Hence, the question of a
presumptive comparison that ‘had I continued in the lower post I would have drawn
more pay in the Selection / Special Grade of the lower post’ does not arise. Hence, the
Committee finds no justification for the revival of Rule 4(3) of the Tamil Nadu Revised
Scales of Pay Rules, 1998 in the Tamil Nadu Revised Scales of Pay Rules, 2009.
revision as on 1-1-2006 so as to get pay commission benefit and to revise the Pension
and other pensionary benefits accordingly. It is noticed that Central scales of pay have
15
been implemented with effect from 1--1--2006 and hence no change can be made in
have retired on superannuation on the last date of completion of one year for grant of
the annual increment by advancing it by a day, for the reasons that they are qualified for
increment as they have rendered one full year service from the last increment.
Associations have pointed out that those who joined Government Service get their first
increment before completion of one full year of service, due to the advancement of
increment to the first day of the quarter concerned, though they have not completed one
full year of service on that date and they are denied their last increment because of the
fact that they are not in service on the due date of increment. The Associations /
individual petitioners have requested to take the last nine months service as one full
year and sanction the increment on the first of the last quarter or before one month of
retirement. It is observed that according to the first proviso to FR 26(a), increment of all
Government servants falling due in a quarter shall be so advanced as to fall due on the
commencement of that quarter concerned, that is advanced to 1st January/ 1st April/ 1st
July/ 1st October. According to ruling 13(ix) under FR 26(a), the increment of a
Government servant which falls due in a quarter may be sanctioned on the first day of
that quarter, even though he retires from service prior to the actual date of accrual of
increment. In all the cases covered by rule 26(a) and the rulings there under, the
Government servant should be on duty on the date on which the increment is due. It is
also observed that at present, in certain cases, Government servants, who retire on the
16
afternoon of the last day of a month, who has rendered one full year of service, does not
get the benefit of an increment, since the increment has to be sanctioned on the next
day, being the first day of the quarter after his retirement as the individual is not in
service on that day. This anomaly will affect those who retire on the 31st March/ 30th
June/ 30th September/ 31st December and whose increment falls due on 1st April/ 1st
July/ 1st October/ 1st January respectively and not to those who retire during the other
eight months in a year. Persons promoted, and new entrants into service get the
benefit of first increment before completing one full year of service, due to advancement
of increment to the 1st of that quarter. In the case of a person who entered into service
or got promoted on the 29th of March in a year, he is entitled to draw his first increment
on the 1st January of next year, on which day he would have put in only 9 months and 3
days of service in that post. This benefit is applicable to each Government servant, at
every stage of promotion. First increment is sanctioned to the new entrants/ promotives
after completion of qualifying service of not less than a year but with retrospective
effect. However in the subsequent years the regular increments are sanctioned on
completion of one year of service. Hence, the comparison made by others who have
rendered service less than a year is not reasonable. It is noticed that in G.O. Ms.
1998, the Government of Andhra Pradesh had ordered that “where an employee’s date
of increment falls due on the day following his retirement, he may be given the benefit of
increment notionally, purely for the purpose of pensionary benefits, subject to the
condition that this should not be considered for any other purpose”. Such benefit is not
17
given to the employees in Government of India as the increments are given only once in
that one full year of service rendered by a Government Servant before retirement
should be recognized and some monetary benefit should be given to such employees.
employees who have rendered service of less than a year as they are not eligible to get
increment under Fundamental Rules. Hence, the Committee recommends that when
date of increment falls due on the day following superannuation on completion of one
full year of service, such service may be considered for the benefit of a notional
increment purely for the purpose of pensionary benefits and not for any other purpose.
Assistants / Accountant are getting lesser pay than Junior Assistants due to sanction of
Higher Start of pay (two increments) for acquiring Degree qualification at the time of
entry into service. For example an Assistant on entry into service gets his pay fixed at
the minimum of the time scale of pay of Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 at Rs.8,000/-,
whereas a Junior Assistant with graduation qualification gets his pay fixed in the scale of
start of pay at two increment (3% + 3% Rs.230 + Rs.230 = Rs.460) gets fixed at Rs.8,060
18
Assistants when compared to the Junior Assistants with Degree qualification. Hence, a
Graduate Junior Assistant / Typist is gets higher basic pay due to the higher start
anomaly and the Committee finds justification to compensate the difference of pay as
However, it is observed that the higher start of pay for acquiring graduate
qualification was introduced many years ago with the aim of incentivizing Junior
Assistants / Typists to acquire higher qualifications when most of the Junior Assistants /
Typists were appointed with the minimum general educational qualification of S.S.L.C.
However, the Committee has examined the present scenario where most of the recruits
are Degree holders and even have Post Graduation / Professional qualification. In such
a situation, the Committee is of the view that such higher start of pay for the Junior
the discontinuance of the grant of higher start of pay to Junior Assistants / Typists to be
recruited in future for possessing Degree qualification. The pay anomaly of the directly
recruited Assistants that would also be avoided. Likewise the higher start granted to the
Record Clerks for possession of S.S.L.C. qualification may also be dispensed with.
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell has observed that based on the One Man
G.P. Rs.5400 in Pay Band--3 and placed on par with post recruited through Group-I
(Panchayats) and Deputy Superintendent of Police have also sought revision one level
above the Assistant Engineer, Agricultural Officers etc. since they were all along one
level above those categories in the pre-revised scales of pay. Likewise consequent on
the changes in the scales of pay of promotion posts viz. Assistant Director of Agriculture
and Deputy Director of Agriculture level led to shifting the scale of pay of Joint Director,
Pay Band-4 Rs.37400--67000 + G.P. Rs.8700. This lead to further horizontal relativity
In the case of Assistant Engineers, the One Man Commission considering that
the posts of Assistant Engineers filled by the direct recruitment through Tamil Nadu
Public Service Commission and the prescribed qualification is B.E., they were placed
with on par with professionally qualified Medical Personnel such as Assistant Surgeons
The One Man Commission has also observed that the Senior Draughting Officer with
the qualification of either a Certificate or a Diploma which is a lower and feeder category
post to Assistant Engineer (if the individual possesses a B.E. Degree) was at the same
Engineer post on a higher scale of pay of Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs. 5400. This
does not appear to be sound reasoning and the Government on reviewing the
recommendations of One Man Commission found that the Assistant Engineers have
20
erroneously been placed on par with Group-I posts which has led to revision of its first
level and second level promotional posts of Assistant Executive Engineers and
Rs.7600. The Government restored the scale of pay of Assistant Executive Engineers
and Executive Engineers to their original level. However, the Assistant Engineers were
granted a new scale of pay one level below the Group-I posts at Rs.15600--39100 +
G.P. Rs.5100 reducing the Grade Pay of Rs.300/- and placing the post in the same
Pay Band. The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell has reviewed the G.O.Ms.No.71,
the parity with similar posts in the Government of India. In Government of India both the
Junior Engineers and the Assistant Engineers are placed at the Section Level (Rs.9300-
34800 + G.P. Rs.4600) and its promotional posts Assistant Executive Engineer
Engineers and Military Engineering Services is not appropriate considering the fact that
these posts are directly recruited and trained for initial posting as Sub–Divisional
Officers, whereas, in the State Government the initial posting is only as a Section Level
Officer and only the next promotional post is Sub–Divisional Officer. The appropriate
comparison is with the Central Public Works Department where the post of Assistant
ii) The comparison with Assistant Surgeon is also not appropriate as there is no
equivalent of a Diploma holder in the Medical line. In the Engineering line, there is a
21
separate category of Diploma holders, who has Junior Engineers who also hold charge
as Section Officers, like Assistant Engineers. The recommendation of the One Man
differential with Junior Engineers which was strongly represented against and appears
the Grade Pay of Rs.5100 already fixed in G.O.Ms.No.71, Finance (PC) Department,
Grade Pay from Junior Engineers. The Committee also recommends that the excess
payments made till the issue of revised orders may be waived and not recovered.
Police and Forest Rangers which had been elevated from Rs.9300--34800+ G.P.
Department dated: 26—2--2011 but which has not been implemented due to the
Interim Stay granted by the Hon’ble High Court on the operation of the G.O. requires
appropriate modification. Hence, the Committee finds it appropriate to place the Block
as a Special Compensatory Allowance for the arduous nature of their work. The
Committee has made necessary recommendations in this regard in the chapter relating
22
+ G.P. Rs.8700 does not merit consideration. In respect of the Veterinary Assistant
and to grant Personal Pay of Rs.1000/- as granted to Tahsildar and Block Development
Officer on the grounds that these posts were similarly placed in the pre-revised scale of
G.P. Rs.4800, the next promotional post to Superintendents have been placed a level
above the Superintendents at Rs.9300--34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4900 as that of the pay
(Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26--02--2011 among others, orders have been issued
23
revising the scale of pay of the posts of Tahsildar and Block Development Officer from
scale of pay granted to the Block Development Officers, Tahsildars etc., could not be
implemented due to the “Interim Stay” granted by the Hon’ble High Court. The
Committee has examined the issue in the light of the requests made by equivalent
categories and has taken a conscious decision to place the Block Development Officers
and Tahsildars in Pay Band --2 instead of Pay Band--3 with the same Grade Pay of
Rs.5100. Considering the fact that the promotional posts to Superintendents were
similarly placed on par with Tahsildar and Block Development Officer in the pre-revised
scales of pay. Accordingly, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of
the promotional posts to Ministerial Superintendent in various Departments and also the
above posts which were placed in the revised pay scale of Rs.9300--34800 +
A number of requests have been received seeking revision of pay for various
posts on the principle that these posts, had the same pay as the ministerial categories of
Junior Assistants and Assistants till the Grade Pay of these two posts were revised in
the Ministerial categories were granted 5% of basic pay as personal pay as on 1—8--92
vide G.O.Ms.No.664, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 24—8--92, considering the
fact that the Secondary Grade Teachers who were enjoying parity with Junior Assistants
in the pre-revised scale of pay of Rs.610--1075 were placed on a higher scale of pay of
24
Junior Assistants. The above 5% personal pay has been granted to Junior Assistants
and its promotional categories in lieu of further scale revision. Similarly, in a subsequent
pay revision also Junior Assistants were placed at Rs.3200--4900 while the Secondary
Grade Teachers were placed at Rs.4500—7000. A plea was made by the ministerial
categories to grant upward revision of scale of pay. However, again the ministerial
categories who were granted 5% personal pay in the pre-revised scales were again
granted 5% of basic pay as personal pay in lieu of the pay revision sought. On this
occasion, instead of granting 5% Personal Pay, the Government has revised the grade
pay of Junior Assistants / Typists from Rs.5200--20200 + Grade pay 2000 to Rs.5200-
-20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 and for Assistants / Steno-Typists from Rs.5200--20200 + G.P.
Rs.2400 to Rs.5200--20200 + G.P.Rs.2800 with notional effect from 1.1.2006 and with
monetary benefit from 1—2--2011. As pay revision was made by Government to the
above categories all the similarly placed categories have requested parity with Junior
Assistant / Assistant. In this connection, the Committee observes that the above
revision cannot be extended to all the categories who were in the pre-revised scales of
Rs.3200--4900 and Rs.4000—6000, since the revision was granted specifically to the
basis and where adequate justification exists, i.e. the non-ministerial and ministerial
subsequent chapters.
25
IV) ASSISTANT
Joint Active Society for Ministerial Staff, Tamil Nadu Government Employees’
Employees’ Association, Federation of Ministerial Staff of Tamil Nadu and Tamil Nadu
Police Department Ministerial Staff Association, Tamil Nadu Public Health Department
Ministerial Officials’ Association and Tamil Nadu Government Officials Union and
various other Associations and individual petitioners (including Chief Minister’s Special
Cell Petitions) have requested to place the post of Assistant in the Pay Band--2 at
Rs.9300--34800 + Grade Pay of Rs.4800 (or) 4600 (or) 4500 (or) 4200 on par with the
posts recruited through the Group-II services of Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission
as they are also recruited in the same examination and with the same qualification.
Further, it is reported that the Junior Assistants gets higher pay due to Higher Start of
pay granted to them for having graduation while entry into service and advance
increment for passing Account Test for Subordinate Officers Part--I. It is noticed that
this post has been placed in the revised scale of pay Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2400
as against the pre-revised scale of pay Rs.4000--6000 which has been subsequently
revised to Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2800. Hence, the Committee feels that there is no
need to revise the pay scale of the post of Assistant, which will lead to receipt of further
26
representations from the similarly placed posts in the pre-revised scale of pay.
However, the Committee is of the view that the difference in pay between the directly
recruited Assistant and Junior Assistant/Typist due to sanction of Higher Start of Pay
that the difference of basic pay (Pay + Grade Pay) in respect of directly recruited
Assistant may be treated as “Personal Pay” to those who are in possession of degree
V) TYPIST GRADE--I
Various Associations and individuals have requested to place the post in the
scale of pay of Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4400 (or) 4200 (or) Rs.5200--20200 + G.P.
Rs.2800 and also requested to fix the Special Grade pay as Rs.9300--34800 + G.P.
Rs.4400 without the restriction criteria. It is observed that this post has been placed in
the revised scale of pay Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 as against the pre-revised
Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 granted to the category of Assistant have not been
extended to the post of Typist Grade--I. Hence, the Committee finds justification in the
requests of Typist Grade--I and recommends to revise the scale of pay of Typist
place this post in the revised scale of pay of Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 as the
scale of pay of its feeder category viz. Record Assistant has been revised from
that this post has been placed in the revised scale of pay Rs.5200--20200 + G.P.
Rs.2400 as against the pre-revised scale of pay Rs.4000--6000 on par with Assistant
and above that of its feeder category of Record Assistant (Rs.5200--20200 + G.P.
Rs.2000). Subsequently the scale of pay of Record Assistant has been revised as
Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 and placed equal to the level of Head Record
Assistant. Hence, the Committee finds justification in the request of the Association /
Head Record Assistants and recommends to revise the pay scale of Head Record
One of the requests put forth by the major associations is to enhance the existing
quantum of Special Pay that was fixed during 1998. It is noticed that based on the
recommendations of One Man Commission, 1998, orders have been issued for the
enhancement of the special pay to the employees [for such of those posts for which
special pay was retained] in the following manner with effect from 1—9—98:--
• The existing rate of Special Pay which has been sanctioned / enhanced prior to
31—12—90 shall be increased by 100% and
• The existing rate of Special Pay which has been sanctioned / enhanced after
31—12—90 shall be increased by 50%.
Subsequently, the Official Committee, 2009 has not enhanced the quantum of special pay but
has recommended for continuance of the special pay without any increase in the existing
quantum considering the fact that the special pay has been taken into account for calculation of
pension at the time of retirement. It is noticed that 15 years have already elapsed since the last
enhancement of special pay which is attached to the specific posts considering their special
nature of work. Hence, the Committee finds justification in the request of the association.
Accordingly, the Committee recommends to enhance the special pay in the following manner :--
28
• The existing rate of Special Pay which has been sanctioned / enhanced on
1—9—98 shall be increased by 100% and
• The existing rate of Special Pay which has been sanctioned / enhanced after
1—9—98 shall be increased by 50%.
The Tamil Nadu Government Office Assistants and Basic Servants Central
Association, Tamil Nadu Secretariat Office Assistants and Basic Servants Association
and the Medical Department Basic Health Workers Association have requested to grant
the Personal Pay as granted to them with effect from 1—9—99. It is noticed that orders
have been issued granting Compensatory Personal Pay to the Office Assistants,
Duffadars and Basic Service Personnel (Hospital Workers) in Hospitals at the following
The Committee observed that the Compensatory Personal Pay drawn by the Office
Assistants, Duffadars and Basic Service Personnel in Hospitals with effect from
1—9—99 have been merged with pay in the subsequent pay revision. As such no
The Committee also recommends that the above enhancement of Special Pay and
those issued in Government Letter No.51082 / Pay Cell / 2010--1, Finance Department,
dated: 15--09—2010 for the posts also for which Grade Pay have been revised with
the employees in whose cases fitment tables are not readily available, the pay of such
employees can be fixed by applying Rule 4 (1) (i) & (ii) of Tamil Nadu Revised Scales
permission to make re-option for pay revision on the grounds that the revisions made in
the scales of pay of posts introduction of additional fitment tables and the Selection
Grade / Special Grade clarifications issued by Government have not reached the grass
root level in time. It is observed that in G.O. Ms. No.234, Finance (Pay Cell)
Department, dated 1—6--2009 itself, the time limit of three months has been fixed for
exercising option to come over to the revised scales of pay. If no option is exercised
within the above time limit, the employee is deemed to have exercised an option to
come over to the revised pay scales as on 1—1—2006 itself. Further, in Government
clarified that an employee may re-opt within three months from the date of issue of
of services or grant of Selection Grade/ Special Grade with retrospective effect, as the
case may be. However, as per Rule 8 (iv) of Tamil Nadu Revised Scales of Pay
Rules, 2009 option once exercised is final. In case of any clarification / Government
Orders issued revising the scales of pay re-option has been allowed within three months
from the date of issue of such orders. Instances have been reported that several
employees failed to accrue the full benefit of the Pay Commission revision due to
exercising of the option date wrongly and deprived of the benefits. The Committee also
recommends that employees may also be given final opportunity for exercising re-option
as a one time measure in cases where the option could not be exercised within the time
limit due to the delayed reach of the instructions issued by Government and also to
Government accepts. Such re-option should not in any case lead to fixation of a lower
requesting the Committee to consider reversion to the earlier pay scale system with an
increase in the pay scale by an appropriate multiple. It is learnt that the Government of
Andhra Pradesh and Government of Karnataka have used this methodology for revising
the pay scales of their employees. The Tamil Nadu Government has taken a decision
for the first time to implement the recommendations of Fourth Central Pay Commission
Nadu Pay Commission with effect from 1—6—1988. Prior to this on each occasion a
separate Pay Commission has been appointed by the State Government. However,
31
both in 1996 and in 2009 it was decided to implement Central scales of pay for the State
The Sixth Central Pay Commission has adopted a comprehensive overhaul and
have merged 32 pay scales into four Pay Bands. The Pay Band structure appears
India. This system was intended to provide for automatic progression within the Group
India with a significant higher salary structure for Pay Band—IV, which is a selection
category. This was also intended to attract and retain talent at higher levels. The
compulsions for State Governments are very different. The State Government has a
large contingent of teachers and field functionaries at the lower and middle levels,
recruits at multiple levels and there are legacy issues of horizontal relativity and vertical
differentiation for promotion posts. When the Pay Band system with Grade Pay is
applied both horizontal relativity within and outsider departments and vertical
differentiation for promotional posts are affected. The total number of Pay Band-IV post
The adoption of Pay Band system has created a number of issues and has led to
While the Committee has dealt with each of the specific issues based on grievances
and suggested, in certain cases, an appropriate remedy, one remedy which will address
32
almost all these issues and also ensure that established horizontal relativities and
maintained, is to revert back to the original pay scale system with an appropriate
conversion factor on the basic pay prevailing prior to 1—1—2006. A conversion factor
of 2.5 times would be a appropriate measure to broadly meet the aspiration of various
categories of employees, which also secure financial benefits in tune with what different
categories have already received, thereby not imposing too much additional cost for
Government. The Committee recommends that this “clean solution” may also be
Representations have been made to grant monetary benefit from 1.1.2006 and to
grant pay revision arrears from 1—1--2006 to 31—12--2006. As the payment of arrears
is a policy issue to be decided by the Government, the request does not come within
2.43/2.625 as there is loss in emoluments and to give 40% benefit uniformly to all
categories and to maintain the ratio of 1:9 between last grade and first grade scale as in
the previous pay revision. It is the policy decision of the Government to adopt Central
scales of pay to its employees, the State Government has adopted the
33
Government of India. There cannot an assured minimum benefit guaranteed for all
posts and nor can a hard and fast rule of a ratio of 1:9 be maintained as referral factor
have to be considered. The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell can only attempt to redress
specific grievances.
As there are a large number of categories, the Committee finds that the pay
anomalies in some cases is due to adoption of the pay band system where the
difference in Grade Pay is only Rs.100/- which is not entirely suitable for State
Government employees. The only way out to redress the pay grievance is to adopt
separate scales of pay by giving uniform pay hike over the pre-existing scales which
would take care of the huge difference in emoluments between Pay Band—III and Pay
every year, Project Allowance, Medical Allowance, one month pay for MRB,
India.
34
• To award Drivers with Gold Medal awards 6/10/12 gms. for Selection/ Special/
Super Grades and to extend free bus pass.
• To grant higher start of pay for graduation to the posts like Laboratory Attender etc
and for passing 10th standard for Record Clerks /Office Assistants etc.
• To enhance the limit to Rs.4,00,000/- for purchasing lands without permission under
Conduct Rules.
• To extend the Personal Pay granted to certain posts in this pay revision and to grant
5% Personal Pay as sanctioned to certain posts in the previous Pay Commissions.
The Committee observes that the personal pay granted to certain posts are based
on the arduous nature of work, duties and responsibilities attached to the posts which
cannot be claimed by the employees in other posts. All other requests like
enhancement of various allowances, enhancement of retirement age are not within the
Time Scale into regular time scale and to regularize the employees under daily wages /
part-time workers. This issue is not within the ambit of the terms of reference of Pay
COMMON CATEGORIES
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues relating
to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational qualification,
mode of recruitment, nature of duties and responsibilities attached to the above said
posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external pay relativities
SECRETARIAT
to revise their scale of pay from Rs.9300 – 34800 + G.P. Rs.4700 to Rs.15600--39100+
G.P. Rs.5400 on par with Other Section Officers in Secretariat. It is observed that the
Committee,1998 on the ground that this post requires the qualification of a Degree plus
Department, dated: 31—08--1998. Though this post was earlier placed on par with
Section Officers in Tamil Nadu Secretariat Service, the subsequent revision of pay
with effect from 12—12--2007 in the pre-revised scales of pay was omitted to be
extended to this post. Considering the similarity in nomenclature and the higher
revise the scale of pay of Section Officer (Translation) on par with Section Officers in
the scale of pay of this post from Rs.9300--34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4700 to Rs.15600--
39100 + Grade Pay Rs.5400 notionally with effect from 12—12—2007 with monetary
ASSISTANT
and Forest Department and certain individuals holding this post have requested to
revise the scale of pay of Assistant in Secretariat from Rs.5200--20200 + Grade Pay
Rs.2400 to Rs.5200–20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2800 on par with Assistant in Tamil Nadu
Ministerial Service. It is noticed that the scale of pay of Assistants in Secretariat has
as against the pre-revised scale of pay of Rs.3625--4900. Subsequently, the One Man
Commission, 2010 taking note of the fact that the post of Assistant in Secretariat is
filled by direct recruitment through Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission and the
of Co-operative Audit which are also filled by direct recruitment through Tamil Nadu
Public Service Commission with the same Degree qualification and therefore requested
the subsequent revision of scale of pay made to the Ministerial Assistants from
Committee finds justification to place the post of Assistants in Secretariat in between the
Junior Assistant and Assistants in Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service. Accordingly the
CASHIER / SHROFF
Tamil Nadu Secretariat Association and the individuals holding this post have
requested to revise the scale of pay of Cashier / Shroff from Rs.5200--20200 + G.P.
requested to place them on par with Despatch Assistant and Record Assistant. It is
observed that this post was placed on par with Record Assistant / Despatch Assistants
justification to revise the scale of pay of Cashier / Shroff on par with the Despatch
Assistants / Record Assistants. Hence, the Committee recommends to revise the scale
Tamil Nadu Secretariat Association has requested to revise the scale of pay of
Rs.2800. The Committee has observed that the post of Head Record Assistant in
Secretariat is the promotional post for Record Assistant and subsequently the scale of
pay of the feeder post viz. Record Assistant has been revised from Rs.5200—20200 +
G.P. Rs.2000 to Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 and its promotion post viz. Head
Record Assistant has been omitted further revision of pay which has lead to an
anomalous situation of placing both the feeder and promotional categories on a same
scale of pay. Hence, the Committee finds justification to revise the scale of pay Head
Record Assistant. Therefore, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of
39
+ G.P. Rs.2800.
COUNCIL DUBASH
Thiru L. Vijayakumar, Council Dubash has requested to revise the scale of pay of
the post as Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs. 4400 on par with Special Grade Drivers on the
ground that Office Assistants who were junior to him had become drivers and their pay
fixed as above. It is observed that the post of Council Dubash was placed one level
above the post of Record Clerk in the scale of pay of Rs.4800—10000 + G.P. Rs.1650.
The comparison made by the individual with the post of Driver is not appropriate.
However, considering the fact that this is a distinct post attached to the Office of the
services rendered by the individual and also considered the fact that the other Office
(Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2400) and decided to place this post in a suitable revised
scale of pay. Accordingly, the Committee recommends that the scale of pay of this post
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues relating
to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational qualification,
mode of recruitment, nature of duties and responsibilities attached to the above said
posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external pay relativities
GOVERNOR’S HOUSEHOLD
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues relating
to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational qualification,
mode of recruitment, nature of duties and responsibilities attached to the above said
posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external pay relativities
AGRICULTURE
Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 31-12-2010 which has been downgraded as
dated: 26--2--2011 on the grounds that they were drawing higher scale (Rs.6500-
11100) than Block Development Officer in the pre-revised scale of pay. The Committee
has observed that the scale of pay of Agricultural Officers has been revised upward
based on the equation made with the Assistant Engineers in the Agricultural
Accordingly, the Committee recommends to place this post in Pay Band—2 at Rs.9300--
34800 + G.P. Rs.5100. Likewise, the Committee also endorses the downgradation in the
pay scales made to the posts of Assistant Director, Deputy Director and Joint Director of
individuals have requested to enhance the scale of pay of these posts from Rs.5200—
20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 to Rs.5200--20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2800 on par with the
Assistants in Ministerial service. The Committee has observed that earlier the post of
43
Depot Manager, Grade-II / Store Keeper, Grade-II were placed on par with Ministerial
Assistants and the subsequent revision of Grade Pay made to Ministerial Assistant from
Rs.2400 to Rs.2800 in G.O. Ms. No.45, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated:
10—02—2011 have not been extended to these posts. Considering the above facts,
the Committee finds justification to place the post of Depot Manager, Grade--II / Store
Keeper, Grade--II on par with Assistants in Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service. Hence, the
Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of these posts from Rs.5200--20200
have requested to revise the scale of pay from Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2000 to
Rs.5200--20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2400 on par with the Junior Assistants of Tamil Nadu
Ministerial Service and higher start of pay granted to Junior Assistants / Typists. Depot
Manager Grade-III / Store Keeper Grade-III were drawing identical scale of pay in
pre-revised scale of pay and revised scale of pay initially on par with Junior Assistants
of other Departments. The anomaly has arisen only due to the revision of Grade Pay of
Junior Assistant as Rs.2400 in G.O. Ms. No.45, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated:
10--02--2011. Though these posts were recruited as Junior Assistant (Security) through
the Group IV exam conducted by Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission and allotted to
these Departments, the Committee does not recommend higher start of pay to these
posts as it has been decided by the Committee to withdraw the higher start of pay
granted to Junior Assistants in the Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service. However, the
Committee recommends to place this post on par with Junior Assistants and to revise
44
the scale of pay of these posts from Rs.5200--20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2000 to Rs.5200--
LABORATORY ASSISTANT
revise the scale of pay on par with the Laboratory Technician Grade--II in Medical
G.P. Rs.4200 as ordered in G.O. Ms. No.296, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated:
However, the Committee recommends to place this post on par with other Laboratory
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues relating
to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational qualification,
mode of recruitment, nature of duties and responsibilities attached to the above said
posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external pay relativities
AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
ASSISTANT GEOLOGIST
requested to revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4700
identically placed in earlier Pay Commission scales of pay and fixed in the revised scale
Rs.6500—11100. Considering the pay parity enjoyed with the post of Assistant
Engineers upto the subsequent revision of pay made to the post of Assistant Engineers
appropriate to place this post on par with Assistant Engineers in Public Works
similar post in Geology and Mining Department which has been recommended to be
placed on par with Assistant Engineer considering the Post Graduate Degree.
Engineering Graduates Association has requested to retain the scale of pay of these
respectively. The Committee has reviewed the orders issued in respect of revision of
place the post of Assistant Engineers in Pay Band—2 with an enhanced Grade Pay of
Rs.5100. Therefore, the Committee finds it appropriate to place this post on par with
Likewise the Committee also recommends to place the posts of Assistant Executive
26—2—2011.
have requested to revise the scale of pay of Junior Draughting Officer from Rs.5200—
20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 to Rs.9300-34800 + G.P. Rs.4200 on par with the Junior
qualification prescribed to this post, the Committee finds justification to place this post
Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.5200--20200 +
ASSISTANT DRAUGHTSMAN
Rs.5200-20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 on par with Junior Assistants and other equivalent
parity with Surveyor and Draughtsman, the Committee recommends to revise the scale
Association and individual petitioners have requested to revise the scale of pay of this
post as Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs. 2800 more than the post of Driver. It is observed
that the post of Senior Tractor Driver had been placed on a higher scale of pay than the
category of Driver and equivalent to Assistant in Ministerial Service. As the scale of pay
of Junior Tractor Driver which is a feeder category has been recommended to be placed
promotion post of Senior Tractor Driver above its feeder category viz. Junior Tractor
Driver. Accordingly, the Committee recommends that the scale of pay of Senior Tractor
Association and individuals have requested to revise the scale of pay of this post as
Rs.5200--20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2400 on par with the category of Driver. It is observed
that in the pre-revised and revised scales of pay the categories of Driver and Junior
the post of Driver as Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 has not been extended to the
post of Junior Tractor Driver. Considering the above fact, the Committee finds
justification to revise the scale of pay of Junior Tractor Driver on par with Drivers.
Accordingly, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of Junior Tractor
Rs.2400.
to revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.1900 to Rs.5200
--20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 and also sanction Risk Allowance of Rs.500/-pm. as this post
has been placed on par with Assistant Soil Conservation Officer in Fourth Tamil Nadu
Pay Commission scales of pay. Comparison made by the association with the post of
the post of Air Compressor Driver is 10th passed plus ITI certificate and whereas it is a
Considering the technical qualification prescribed to the post of Air Compressor Driver,
the Committee finds justification to place this post in the scale of pay of Rs. 5200—
20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 as applicable to the Grade–II Trade Posts having similar
technical qualification. However, the Committee finds no merit on the sanction of Risk
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues relating
to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational qualification,
mode of recruitment, nature of duties and responsibilities attached to the above said
posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external pay relativities
AGRICULTURAL MARKETING
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues relating
to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational qualification,
mode of recruitment, nature of duties and responsibilities attached to the above said
posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external pay relativities
ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTANT
scale of pay on par with their counterparts in Sericulture and Industries and Commerce
It is observed that the scale of pay for the post of Commercial Accountant in the
departments of Sericulture and Industries and Commerce have been elevated based on
the recommendations of One Man Commission and the said post of Commercial
transfer from the post of Junior Assistant and Typist in Ministerial Service. Consequent
Rs.5200—20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2800. The above revision may also be extended to
has represented that the Government of India during the Fifth Central Pay Commission
itself has upgraded the Veterinary Officers Uniformly and brought the post of Veterinary
Assistant Surgeon on par with Medical Doctors. The Sixth Central Pay Commission in
its report has also categorically stated that the Veterinarians should have complete
parity with General Duty Medical Officers and Dental Doctors in terms of pay scales
and career prospects. The Veterinary Assistant Surgeon languishes in the same post
for nearly 26--28 years for promotion as Asst. Director (AH) and promotional
opportunities are meager. They have pointed out that the OMC, 98 has recommended
to place the Veterinary Assistant Surgeon at Rs.8000—13500 on par with Civil Assistant
Surgeons. Considering the above, the Government has issued orders revising the
as against the pre-revised scale of pay of Rs.8000—13500 on par with Civil Assistant
Surgeons notionally with effect from 1—1—2006 with monetary benefit from
1—8—2010. Therefore, the Association has requested to restore the existing revised
Animal Husbandry Department have been granted the revised scale of pay of
11100 notionally with effect from 1--1--06 with monetary benefit from 1--1--07
54
Subsequently, the One Man Commission, 2010 has examined the request considering
“After an in depth study of the qualification of the Veterinary Assistant Surgeons, the
Fifth Central Pay Commission has improved the scale of pay of Veterinary Assistant
Surgeon on par with Civil Assistant Surgeons with M.B.B.S. qualification. This
Commission has decided to adopt Central Pay parity for the comparable posts in the
State in consonance with the policy of Government. Considering the qualification,
identical job factors and scale levels of the Veterinary Assistant Surgeons and the
similar post in Government of India, this Commission recommends revision of scale of
pay of the post of Veterinary Assistant Surgeon from Rs.6500—11100 to Rs.8000—
13500”.
(ii) Further, that Commission has observed that based on the recommendations
of the Sixth Central Pay Commission the parity with General Duty Medical Officers and
Husbandry along with registration in the Veterinary Council of India has been continued
and they have been placed in the scale of pay of Rs.15600—39100 + Grade Pay of
Rs.5400 in the revised pay structure. The One Man Commission, 2010 has therefore
taking into account the similarity in qualification and job factors of this post in the State
earlier One Man Commission 1998. Accordingly, the Commission has recommended
that the revision of scale of pay for the post of Veterinary Assistant Surgeon in Animal
Commission also recommended that the scale of pay of the promotion post viz.,
2010 and found that the posts such as Assistant Engineer, Inspector of Factories,
Junior Electrical Inspector etc. which is entry level post requiring B.E. Degree was
placed erroneously on par with Group—I posts with consequential pay scale revision to
the first level and second level promotional posts above the Group-I posts and therefore
it was decided by Government to downgrade the pay scale of the above posts one level
+ G.P. Rs.5100 and due to this downgradation the pay scale of Veterinary Assistant
G.P. Rs.5100. However, they continued to draw the higher scale of pay consequent on
the “Interim Stay” granted by the Hon’ble High Court on the operation of the
G.O.Ms.No.71, Finance (PC) Department, dated: 26—2—11. The issue of the appropriate
Grade Pay and Pay Band of Assistant Engineers in Public Works Department had been
examined separately and necessary recommendations have been made to place the
(PC) Department, dated: 26—2—2011 in consonance with the pay scale available to their
counterparts in Central Public Works Department. On the same line, in the case of
+ Grade Pay of Rs.5200 in view of the qualification, arduous duties and responsibilities
attached to the post in the field one level below their counterparts in Government of
India. Accordingly, the Committee recommends that the pay scale of Rs.15600—39100
56
+ G.P. Rs. 5200 for Veterinary Assistant Surgeon / Research Assistant and its
39100 + G.P. Rs. 5400 as originally in existence for Assistant Directors of other
departments is appropriate.
Dr. N. Balasubramanian, Joint Directors (Retd) and Writ Petitioners in W.P. No. 7463 of
2011 have requested to restore the pay scale as recommended by the Government in
post was placed in the Pay Band-3 at Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.7600 as against the
recommendations which has been subsequently placed in the next Pay Band-4 at
Rs.37400--67000 + G.P. Rs.8700 and then restored to its original level pay scale of
26--02--2011. As the Hon’ble High Court has granted ‘Interim Stay’ on the
only to the Appellants, the Committee has reviewed the entire Government Order and
concluded that placing Joint Director of Animal Husbandry in Pay Band-4 may not be
appropriate and in deviation to the corresponding pay scale in Government of India and
accordingly, endorses to retain the original pay scale recommended by the Official
also recommends to place the post of Deputy Director of Animal Husbandry in the
appropriate revised scales of pay of Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 on par with the
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues relating
to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational qualification,
mode of recruitment, nature of duties and responsibilities attached to the above said
posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external pay relativities
ARCHAEOLOGY
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
scale of pay of Assistant Engineer on par with their counterpart in Public Works
Department. The Committee recommends to place this post in the revised scale of
pay of Rs.9300—34800 + G.P Rs. 5100 on par with Assistant Engineers in Public
Works Department.
Binders and Menders of Oriental Manuscript Library have requested to revise the
scale of pay of the post of Binders and Menders as per the orders issued for Trade
of pay of technical categories (Trade Posts) have already been rationalized by the One
Man Commission,2010 the revised scales of pay granted to similar categories of posts
Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of Binder and Mender from
DEPUTY DIRECTOR /
DEPUTY SUPERINTENDING ARCHAEOLOGIST
Archunan have requested to revise the scale of pay of the posts of Deputy Director /
59
observed that the post of Deputy Director in Archaeology has been granted the revised
scale of pay of Rs.15600-39100 + Grade Pay of Rs.5700 notionally with effect from
1-1-2006 with monetary benefit from 1-1-2007 as against the pre-revised scale of pay of
Rs.9100--14050. The post of Deputy Director in other Departments have been granted
the revised scale of pay of Rs.15600--39100 + Grade Pay of Rs.6600 as against the
among the holders of the post of Assistant Director / Registering Officer in the scale of
pay of Rs.15600--39100 + Grade Pay Rs.5400 as that of the Assistant Directors in other
departments. Hence in order to maintain the flow of hierarchical structure among the
middle management posts, the Committee has decided to place the posts of Deputy
Grade Pay Rs.6600 on par with the Deputy Directors in other Departments.
PANDITS
Pandits of Oriental Manuscript Library have requested to revise the scale of pay
G.P. Rs.4400. The educational qualification prescribed for this post and the duties and
responsibilities attached to the post is commensurate with the post of Pandit in Indian
Medicine Department. Hence, the Committee recommends to place the post of Pandits
60
on par with their counterpart in Indian Medicine and revise their scale of pay from
SENIOR FOREMAN
Tvl. A. Sankar and C. Sathiyavelu have requested to revise the scale of pay of
the post of Senior Foreman on par with their counterparts in Stationery and Printing as
Commission, 2010 the scale of pay of the post of Senior Foreman in Stationery and
Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4400. It is observed that the post of Junior Foreman which
is a feeder category for Senior Foreman in Stationery and Printing Department itself
was placed on a higher scale of pay in the pre-revised scale of pay of Rs.4500--7000
which has been revised as Rs.9300--34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4200. Considering that the
pre-existing level of the post of Senior Foreman in Archaeology Department was only at
Rs.4300—6000, this post cannot be placed on par with Senior Foreman which was at a
higher scale earlier. However, the Committee recommends to place the post one level
above the existing pay scale and to revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.5200--
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
Sl. Name of the Post Existing Scale of pay Requested Scale of pay
No. + Grade pay + Grade pay
(Rs.) (Rs.)
1. Assistant Executive Engineer 15600--39100 + 5400 15600--39100 + 6600
2. Ephigraphical Attender 48-00-10000 + 1650 5200--20200 + 2400
3. Librarian 9300--34800 + 4400 15600--39100 + 5400
61
Sl. Name of the Post Existing Scale of pay Requested Scale of pay
No. + Grade pay + Grade pay
(Rs.) (Rs.)
4. Maistry 4800--10000 + 1650 5200--20200 + 2400
5. Sthapathy 9300--34800 + 4200 9300--34800 + 4800
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues relating
to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational qualification,
mode of recruitment, nature of duties and responsibilities attached to the above said
posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external pay relativities
ARCHIVES
brought to notice of the Committee that these posts are filled by promotion from the
revise the scale of pay of this post as Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs. 5400. The
Committee has observed that this post has been placed in the pre-revised scale of
Subsequently, the One Man Commission, 2010 has recommended to revise the
has elsewhere recommended to elevate the scale of pay of the categories which
Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.5100. Considering the above facts, the Committee finds
justification to extend the above elevated scale of pay to the posts of Research
ASSISTANT EDITOR
The Commissioner of Tamil Nadu Archives and Historical Research and the
Assistant Editors of Tamil Nadu Archives have requested to revise the scale of pay
34800 + Grade Pay of Rs.4900. It is observed that as per adhoc rules the feeder
63
category for Assistant Editor is Superintendent and its scale of pay has been
the view that there is an imperative need to revise the scale of pay of Assistant
Editor one level above the scale of pay of Superintendent to rectify the existing
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
Sl. Name of the Post Existing Scale of pay Requested Scale of pay +
No. + Grade pay Grade pay
(Rs.) (Rs.)
1. Binder 5200--20200 + 1900 5200--20200 + 2400
2. Dark Room Assistant 5200--20200 + 1800 5200--20200 + 2400
3. Operator 5200--20200 + 1900 5200--20200 + 2400
4. Preservation Clerk 5200--20200 + 1900 5200--20200 + 2400
5. Research Assistant 9300--34800 + 4800 9300--34800 + 4900
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
64
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said post and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scale of pay is not warranted.
65
Personal Pay of Rs.750/- p.m. to the post of Secondary Grade Warden on par with
the parity with Secondary Grade Teachers, the Committee recommends to extend
Classes Department.
B.T. WARDEN
The Director of Backward Classes Welfare has requested to revise the scale
Rs.9300 — 34800 + G.P. Rs.4600 on par with B.T. Teachers. As the B.T. Wardens
were placed on par with B.T. Teachers, they were granted the revised scale of pay of
has not been extended to the B.T. Wardens in Backward Classes Welfare
Department. Hence, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of B.T.
The Committee has taken into account the fact that the post of Watchman is
placed on par with other Last Grade Government Servants and therefore has not
Sl. Name of the Existing Scale of pay + Grade pay Requested Scale of pay + Grade pay
No. Post (Rs.) (Rs.)
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said post and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scale of pay is not warranted.
67
COMMERCIAL TAXES
Association have requested to revise the scale of pay of Commercial Tax Officer
(erstwhile Deputy Commercial Tax Officer) as Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.5100 on par with
Tahsildar in Revenue Department as ordered in G.O. Ms. No. 71, Finance (PC)
Department, dated: 26--02--2011 and also sanction Personal Pay of Rs.1000 on par
with Tahsildars as ordered in G.O. Ms. No. 45, Finance (PC) Department, dated:
Official Committee, 2009 this post has been placed in the revised scale of pay of
pay to this post, the Committee finds justification to revise the scale of pay of
the post of Commercial Tax Officer (erstwhile Deputy Commercial Tax Officer) from
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
69
CO-OPERATION
COOPERATIVE SUB-REGISTRAR
Finance (PC) Department, dated: 26—2—2011 considering their pay parity existed
in the pre-revised and revised scales of pay. The Committee has elsewhere decided
to elevate the scale of pay of the categories which were placed at Rs.9300—34800
Rs.9300--34800 + Grade Pay Rs.5100. Considering the pay parity of this post with
the elevated scale of pay of Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs. 5100 recommended to this
post. Accordingly, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of this post
Rs.5100.
Association has requested to revise the scale of pay of this post as Rs.9300—34800
+ G.P. Rs.4300 and the Tamil Nadu Cooperation Department Middle Officials
Association has requested to revise the scale of pay of this post as Rs.5200—20200
+ G.P. Rs. 2800 on par with Ministerial Assistant. The Committee has observed that
this post has been filled by promotion from the category of Junior Assistant / Typist
and also by direct recruitment through Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission and
equally placed with the post of Ministerial Assistant in the revised scale of pay at
70
Committee, 2009. Subsequently, the scales of pay of the post of Junior Assistant,
Typist and its promotional post Assistant have been revised as Rs.5200—20200 +
G.P. Rs.2400 and Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 respectively. Though, the post of
Junior Inspector of Cooperative Societies have been filled by promotion from the
post of Junior Assistant / Typist the revision of Grade Pay made to the post of
Assistant has not been extended to the post of Junior Inspector of Cooperative
Societies. Considering the above facts, the Committee finds justification to extend
the enhanced Grade Pay made to the post of Assistant to the post of Junior
revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 to
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
71
CO-OPERATIVE AUDIT
Tamil Nadu Cooperative Audit Department Officials Union and Tamil Nadu
Cooperative Audit Department Employees Association have requested to revise the scale of
pay of this post as Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs. 5100 on par with Tahsildar, Block
(PC) Department, dated: 26—2—2011. The Committee has observed that this post
has also been filled by transfer from the post of Cooperative Sub-Registrar and
earlier placed on an identical scale of pay. Considering the pay parity enjoyed by
Accordingly, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of this post from
The Tamil Nadu Arasu Aluvalar Kazhagam has requested to revise the scale
Assistant considering the pay parity with these posts in the pre-revised and revised
scales of pay. The Tamil Nadu Cooperative Audit Department Officials Association
G.P. Rs.4300 on par with Assistant Inspector of Local Fund Audit. The Committee
has observed that this post has been filled by recruitment by transfer from among the
recruitment or by transfer from among the posts of Junior Assistant / Typist and
equally placed with the post of Ministerial Assistant in the revised scale of pay at
72
Committee, 2009. Subsequently, the scale of pay of the post of Assistant has been
revised as Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs. 2800 and this revision of pay has not been
Considering the above facts, the Committee finds justification to extend the revision
of scale of pay made to the post of Assistant also to the post of Junior Cooperative
Auditor. Accordingly, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of this
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
73
COLLEGIATE EDUCATION
Programmer in various Government Arts and Science Colleges have requested the
following:--
by designating them as Programmer and to revise the scale of pay of this post as
(ii) Suitable orders may be issued by giving Pay / Service protection to them
as per the orders issued in the abovesaid Government order dated: 26—8—2010 so
as to continue in the post of Programmer with the revised scale of pay of Rs.9300—
(iii) Considering the qualification acquired by them and the services rendered
(nearly 20 years) in this post Career Advancement may be granted to this post.
(v) To issue an additional fitment table for fixation of pay of the employees
who have attained Selection Grade / Special Grade prior to 1-1-2006 consequent on
74
the revision of pay made to the Ordinary Grade Scale of pay from one Pay Band to
another Pay Band with effect from 1-1-2006 as there is anomaly in the pay fixed
between the Selection Grade and Ordinary Grade holders of the same post.
It is noticed that the Government has started Post Graduate and Degree
Accordingly, sanction was accorded for the creation of Programmer in the cadre of
norms nor by All India Council for Technical Education(AICTE) norms but comes
under the Tamil Nadu State General Subordinate Service. The educational
qualification prescribed for this post is B.Sc. Computer Science (or) B.Sc. Maths or
Physics or Statistics as main subject with one year certificate course in Computer
recognized Polytechnic. The Official Committee, 2009 has granted the revised scale
to the One Man Commission, 2010 to fix their scale of pay as Rs.5900—9900 in the
pre-revised scale with corresponding revised scale of pay on par with similar posts in
Commission has observed that originally the post of Programmer was created in the
cadre of Laboratory Assistant by direct recruitment with B.Sc. Computer Science (or)
75
B.Sc., Maths or Physics or Statistics as main subject plus one year certificate
qualification and nature of work and job responsibilities attached to this post and
Now, representations have been made before the Committee stating that the
Programmer and granted the scale of pay of Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4200 vide -
are unable to get the benefit of higher scale of pay of Rs.9300—34800 + G.P.
designating them as Programmer and revise the scale of pay of this post as
qualification prescribed to that post. The qualification prescribed for the Information
Technology category and its nomenclature ordered in the above said Government
order is in order. As per the said Government order the qualification prescribed for
qualification than the prescribed one by the incumbents and pointing out
The Committee finds that the pre-revised scale of pay (Rs.3050—4590) granted
to the post of Programmer (in the cadre of Laboratory Assistant) in Computer wing /
Computer Science Department of Collegiate Education does not find place in the
Programmer is higher than the post of Assistant Programmer as pointed out by the
higher scale of pay granted to the post of Programmer citing the protection ordered
in the said Government order is not appropriate. Further, granting University Grants
Commission scales of pay / Career Advancement does not come under the purview
77
pay as Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4600 by arguing with the report copy of One
Man Commission, 2010, the Committee observed as the post is filled by direct
recruitment and the qualification prescribed is B.Sc. Computer Science (or) B.Sc.,
Maths or Physics or Statistics as main subject plus one year certificate course or
diploma in Computer Application which fulfills the qualification prescribed to the post
dated: 26—8—2010. Therefore, the Committee finds justification to place the post of
+ G.P. Rs.4400 on par with the Assistant Programmer under Information Technology
Department.
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
79
DRUG INSPECTOR
The Tamil Nadu Drug Control Officers Association has requested to revise the
scale of pay of this post on par with Assistant Engineers in Public Works
Department. The individuals holding the post of Drug Inspector in Drugs Control
Department have requested to revise the scale of pay of this post as Rs.16150—
42590 on par with their similar post in the State of Andhra Pradesh. The Committee
has observed that this post has been placed in the pre-revised scale of pay of
Subsequently, the One Man Commission, 2010 has recommended to revise the
India. The Committee is of the view that it would be appropriate that the categories
which were already placed at Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs. 4900 corresponding to the
Rs.5100 in the same Pay Band. Accordingly, the Committee recommends to revise
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
81
ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR
enhance the Grade Pay of the post of Additional Director from Rs.37400—67000 +
G.P. Rs. 8700 to Rs.37400-- 67000+ G.P. Rs. 8800 on par with similar posts in other
Husbandry. It may be stated that the post of Additional Director in most of the
Education and Public Health and Preventive Medicine Departments were placed on
categories in the Pay Band-4 in the revised scale of pay of Rs.37400—67000 + G.P.
Rs. 8700 and Rs.37400—67000 + G.P. Rs. 8800 respectively. Further, the post of
Additional Director in Economics and Statistics Department is the second level post
and only two posts are in existence. It is noticed that the One Man Commission,
2010 has recommended to revise the scale of pay of Additional Director in Geology
+ G.P. Rs. 8800. In order to maintain parity with the other Additional Directors, the
requested to revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs. 5200--20200 +
Common category. This post is filled by direct recruitment or by transfer from the
post of Junior Assistant and Typist. The Official Committee 2009 has placed this post
G.P. Rs.2400. Subsequently, the scale of pay of the post of Assistant under
Considering the pay parity with the post of Assistant, the Committee recommends to
extend the above upgraded scale of pay of Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 to the
Forest Department. It is observed that the nature of work of these posts are
to get accuracy in datas. Considering the identical nature of work and the higher
Grade Pay granted to the similar post viz. Console Operator in Forest Department,
the Committee finds justification to revise the scale of pay of the posts of Senior
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
84
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
85
ELECTRICAL DRAUGHTSMAN
Rs.4200 on par with Tester. Though, the post of Electrical Draughtsman has been
placed on the scale of pay of Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2800, the request of the
par with the diploma holders. Considering the diploma qualification prescribed for
this post the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of the post of
prescribed for this post viz. Degree in Engineering. The posts of Junior Electrical
granted to the post of Assistant Engineer in Public Works Department and same has
(Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26--02--2011. Similarly, the scale of pay of Junior
Electrical Inspector which was revised on par with Assistant Engineers was also
brought down in the abovesaid Government Order. The Committee has reviewed the
86
orders issued in G.O. Ms. No. 71, Finance (PC) Department, dated: 26--02--2011
elsewhere and recommended to place the post of Assistant Engineer & other
Government of India. Therefore, the Committee finds it appropriate to place the post
of Junior Electrical Inspector in Pay Band--2 with an enhanced Grade Pay. The
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
87
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
88
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
89
FOREST DEPARTMENT
FOREST RANGER
Tamil Nadu Forest Staff Association has requested to revise the scale of pay
of this post as Rs.15600--39100 + GP 6600 above the level of the posts like
Tahsildar, Block Development Officer and Inspector of Police. The Retired Forest
Officers Association has requested to revise the scale of pay of this post as
Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 and certain individuals holding this post have
granted to this post. The Committee has reviewed the orders issued in
G.O. Ms. No. 71, Finance (PC) Department, dated: 26--02--2011 elsewhere and
recommended to place the post of Assistant Engineer and other equivalent posts
appropriately in Pay Band—2 instead of Pay Band--3 with an enhanced Grade Pay
of Rs.5100. Therefore, the Committee finds it appropriate to place the post of Forest
Rangers who have been granted the enhanced revised scale of pay of Rs.9300—
recommends to revise the scale of pay of the post of Forest Ranger as Rs.9300--
34800 + G.P. Rs.5100 plus Rs.1000/- p.m. as Special Allowance for their arduous
nature of work.
Pay of the post of Junior Draughting Officer from Rs.5200--20200 + Grade pay
justification to place this post on par with similar post in Technical Education and
revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.5200--20200 + Grade pay Rs.2000 to
Department. It is noticed that the scale of pay of the post of Assistant Draughtsman
has been revised from Rs.5200--20200 + Grade pay Rs.2000 to Rs.5200 + 20200 +
Grade pay Rs.2400. Hence, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay
20200 + Grade pay Rs.2400 on par with their counterparts in Survey Department.
LEGAL OFFICER
place this post in the Pay Band—3 at Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.7600 on par with
Principal Chief Conservator of Forests has also recommended to revise the scale of
pay of this post as Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.6600. The Committee has observed
that the next level promotion of the post of Section Officer in Secretariat is Under
91
39100 + G.P. Rs.6600. Hence, the Committee finds that it is appropriate to upgrade
this post on par with Under Secretary to Government in the revised scale of pay on a
recommends that the request of the individual may be decided at Government level.
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
qualification, mode of recruitment, nature of duties and responsibilities attached to
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
93
FISHERIES DEPARTMENT
Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 31.12.2010. It is observed that this post has
G.P. Rs.8700 and then downgraded to the original level of pay scale of Rs.15600—
39100 + G.P. Rs.7600 in G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated
26.02.2011. As the Hon’ble High Court has granted ‘Interim Stay’ on the
implementation of the G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated
26.02.2011 only to Appellants, the Committee has reviewed the entire Government
Order and concluded that placing the Joint Director of Fisheries in Pay Band-4 may
India. Accordingly, the Committee endorses to retain the original pay scale of
and as ordered in G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated:
Deputy Director and Assistant Director of Fisheries in the appropriate revised scales
orders issued by Government uniformly on par with the Deputy Directors / Assistant
G.O.Ms.No.450, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 31-12-2010 which has been
Agricultural Department in Pay Band—2 instead of Pay Band—3 with a Grade Pay of
Research Assistant in Pay Band-- 2 with an enhanced Grade Pay. The Committee,
Thirunelveli District Boat Drivers Association has requested to revise the scale
of pay of the post of Boat Drivers from Rs.5200—20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2000 to
Rs.5200—20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2400 on par with Light Motor Vehicle Drivers as
they were placed equally with them from the Fourth Pay Commission scales of pay.
The Boat Drivers in Fisheries Department were placed in the revised scale of pay of
Rs.3200—4900 on par with Light Motor Vehicle Drivers. Subsequently, the scale of
with effect from 1-1-2006 with monetary benefit from 1-3-2011. This revision has not
been extended to the post of Boat Drivers which is merely an omission. Hence, the
95
par with other Drivers and to revise their scale of pay from Rs.5200—20200 + Grade
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
96
FORENSIC SCIENCE
SCIENTIFIC OFFICER
(erstwhile Scientific Assistant Grade—I)
G.P. Rs.5400 on par with the post of Assistant Manager in Vigilance Anti Corruption
Committee has observed that the scale of pay of this post (erstwhile Scientific
pay of this post has been revised as Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4900 considering
the P.G. qualification and higher job responsibility. Comparison with the post of
this post a level above the Superintendents and on par with their promotional posts
and on par with the Tahsildars, Block Development Officers in Pay Band—2 instead
G.P. Rs.5100.
97
requested to revise the scale of pay of this post as Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4800
as this post has been all along placed on a higher scale of pay than Ministerial
viz. Scientific Officer one level above the Superintendents, the Committee finds
Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of Junior Scientific Officer to the
TECHNICIAN
Welfare Association has requested to revise the scale of pay of Technician from
post comparison made by the association with the post of Laboratory Technician
Grade-II is not appropriate. However, the Committee finds justification to place this
revise the scale of pay of the post of Technician from Rs.5200 — 20200 + Grade
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
99
ASSISTANT GEOLOGIST
revise the scale of pay of the post of Assistant Geologist on par with Assistant
Engineers in Public Works Department and to restore the pay parity that existed prior
on par with that of Assistant Engineers in Public Works Department prior to the
justification to restore the parity by extending the scale of pay now recommended by
the Committee to the Assistant Engineer in Pay Band –2 instead of Pay Band—3.
Hence, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of this post from
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
100
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
101
SUPERVISOR GRADE – I
and revise the Grade Pay of this post as Rs.4900 on par with the Senior
were drawn from Treasuries and Accounts Service originally. The Commissioner,
Government Data Centre has also recommended the request of the Association. It is
noticed from the adhoc rules that this post is also filled by transfer from among the
and Accountant Grade-I from the Tamil Nadu Treasuries and Accounts Subordinate
recommendation, this Committee finds justification to place this post in the revised
scale of pay of Rs.9300--34800 + Grade Pay Rs.5100 on par with the promotional
Department. Hence, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of the
post of Supervisor Grade-I from Rs.9300-- 34800 + Grade pay Rs.4600 to Rs.9300--
34800 + Grade Pay Rs.5100 without any change in the existing nomenclature.
SUPERVISOR GRADE – II
Superintendent and to revise the Grade Pay of the post from Rs. 4300 to Rs.4800 on
par with the Superintendent of Treasuries and Accounts Department on the grounds
that they were drawn from Treasuries & Accounts Service originally. The
Commissioner, Government Data Centre has also recommended the request of the
Association. It is noticed from the adhoc rules that the post of Supervisor, Grade-II
is filled by promotion from among the holders of the post of Assistant in the
Sub – Treasury Officer Grade-II in Treasuries and Accounts Service. Further this
post was placed on par with Superintendents in the pre-revised scales as that of the
justification to place this post on par with Ministerial Superintendent with effect from
12—12--2007, as the feeder category and promotional posts are similar. Hence,
this Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of Supervisor Grade-II from
par with Ministerial Superintendents notionally with effect from 12--12--2007 with
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
104
GOVERNMENT LITIGATION
MANAGER
with Section Officer in Tamil Nadu Secretariat. The Committee has noticed that this
post has been placed in the revised scale of pay of Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4900
to extend the same pay scale to the Office Managers on par with the promotional
GOVERNMENT EXAMINATIONS
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
106
HANDLOOM INSPECTOR:
The Director of Handlooms and Textiles has requested to revise the scale of
Rs.9300--34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4300 on par with the post of Senior Inspectors in
effect from 1--1--2006 with monetary benefit from 1--1--2007. Subsequently based
on the recommendations of One Man Commission,2010 the scale of pay of the post
Pay Rs.4200 to Rs.9300--34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4300 notionally with effect from
1--1--2006 with monetary benefit from 1--8--2010. However the above revision has
not been extended to the Handloom Inspectors by the One Man Commission, 2010.
Department.
HANDLOOM OFFICER:
post of Handloom Officer has been granted the revised scale of pay of Rs.9300--
107
34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4500 notionally with effect from 1--1--2006 with monetary
that of the Cooperative Sub-Registrar. The post of Handloom Officer has been filled
Rs.9300--34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4900 notionally with effect from 1--1--2006 with
monetary benefit from 1--8--2010. Considering the fact that, the Handloom Officers
were placed one level above Ministerial Superintendents originally, the Committee
recommends to revise the scale of pay of the post of Handloom Officer from
The Director of Handlooms and Textiles has requested to revise the scale of
39100 + G.P. Rs.5100 on par with that of Tahsildars and Inspector of Police. As the
post of Textile Control Officer is a promotional post of Handloom Officer for which
Pay Rs.4900, the Committee finds justification to place this post one level above its
feeder category. Accordingly, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
Sl. Name of the Post Existing Scale of pay Requested Scale of pay
No. + Grade pay + Grade pay
(Rs.) (Rs.)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
1 Joint Director 15600--39100 + 7600 37400--67000 + 8700
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said post and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scale of pay is not warranted.
109
The Committee has observed that the scale of pay of Horticulture Officer has
been revised upward based on the equation made with the Agricultural Officers in
Department. Likewise, the Committee also endorses the restoration of the pay
scales to its original level made to the posts of Assistant Director, Deputy Director
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
Sl. Name of the Post Existing Scale of pay Requested Scale of pay
No. + Grade pay + Grade pay
(Rs.) (Rs.)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Deputy Director
1 (Administration) 15600--39100 + 6600 15600--39100 + 7600
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
111
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER
Gazetted Officers Association has requested to revise the scale of pay of the post
67000 + G.P. Rs.8900. It is noticed that the One Man Commission has placed the
Additional Director of Industries and Commerce on par with the Additional Director of
Geology and Mining for which the scale of pay has been revised as Rs.37400--
67000 + Grade Pay Rs.8800. Hence, on the same analogy, the Committee
G.P. Rs.8700 to Rs.37400-67000 + Grade Pay Rs.8800 on par with other Additional
Directors.
have requested to place the post of Executive Officer Grade—I on par with
G.P. Rs.5100 on the grounds that they were similarly placed in the pre-revised scale
of pay and having B.L. qualification. It is observed that this post has been placed in
the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.9300—
Tamil Nadu Thirukoil Nirvaga Athigarigal Sangam has requested to revise the
scale of pay of the post of Executive Officer Grade--III from Rs.5200--20200 + G.P.
Rs.2400 to Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 on par with Assistant as the duties and
Rs.5200--20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2800, the Committee recommends that the scale
of pay of the post of Executive Officer Grade-III may be revised from Rs.5200--
Ministerial Assistants.
the scale of pay of the post of Executive Officer Grade--IV from Rs.5200--20200+
G.P. Rs.2000 to Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 on par with Junior Assistant as the
duties and responsibilities are parallel and complimentary to Junior Assistant. This
post was placed on par with Junior Assistant in the Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service.
Staff Association has requested to place this post in the Pay Band-3 at Rs.15600-
District Rehabilitation Officer for Disabled / Forest Rangers as the post of Assistant
Audit Officer were identically placed in the pre-revised scale of pay. Further the
Tamil Nadu H.R. & C.E Department Audit Staff Association has also requested to
place the post in the Pay Band--3 at Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 on par with
Assistant Commissioner of H.R. & C.E Department. It is observed that this post has
Committee has recommended to enhance the Grade pay of these posts without any
change in the Pay Band with Grade Pay of Rs.5100, it is considered appropriate to
extend similar revision to the Assistant Audit Officer. The Committee accordingly,
recommends to revise the scale of pay of Assistant Audit Officer from Rs.9300--
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
115
post in the scale of pay of Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 on par with Head
Draughting Officer and some individuals holding the post of Assistant Engineer has
26--02--2011. The Committee has reviewed the above said orders and elsewhere
Pay Band—2 with an enhanced Grade Pay. Therefore, the Committee finds it
appropriate to place these posts on par with their counterparts in Public Works
G.P. Rs.5100. The Committee also endorses the orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.71,
GEOLOGIST
as Head Geologist and place the post in the Pay Band—3 at Rs.15600--39100 +
G.P. Rs.7700 as he has no chances for promotion from the date of appointment. It
is observed that this post was granted pay parity with Assistant Engineers in the
pre-revised scale of pay. Hence, the Committee recommends that the scale of pay
116
this post.
requested to revise the scale of pay of the post of Senior Draughting Officer as
Committee recommendations the scale of pay of Senior Draughting Officer has been
pay of Rs.6500—11100 on par with similar post in Public Works Department. The
One Man Commission,2010 has recommended for further revision of scale of pay of
this post as Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4900 taking into account that this post has
already placed above the level of Ministerial Superintendent and on par with
(Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26--02--2011. The Committee has reviewed the
above said orders and elsewhere recommended to place the post of Assistant
Engineer in Public Works Department and other equivalent posts in Pay Band—2
with an enhanced Grade Pay of Rs.5100. Therefore, the Committee finds justification
to place this post at Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.5100 restoring the parity that existed
Tamil Nadu Highways Officials Union have requested to revise the scale of pay of
Education Department. It is noticed that the post of Junior Draughting Officer in both
the Departments were in the same pre-revised scale of pay Rs.4500--7000 and
Rs.2800. However, the One Man Commission 2010, has revised the pay scale of
34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4200 considering the diploma qualification but has omitted to
Department which is also having the same technical qualification. Hence, the
Committee finds justification to revise the scale of pay of Junior Draughting Officer
Committee, recommends to revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.5200--20200
+ Grade Pay Rs.2800 to Rs.9300--34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4200 on par with their
counterparts in Technical Education Department and this revision pay may also be
ASSISTANT DRAUGHTSMAN
Assistant Draughtsman have requested to revise the scale of pay of this post from
118
Junior Assistant and other equivalent posts and Thiru A. Kalidoss, Assistant
Draughtsman (Special Grade) has requested to place this post in the Pay Band--2 at
observed that this post was earlier placed in the revised scale of pay at the level of
+ G.P. Rs.2000. Subsequently, the scale of pay of the posts of Junior Assistants /
Department for such revision of pay. Hence, the Committee finds justification to
Rs.2000 to Rs.5200--20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2400. The above revision may also be
RESEARCH ASSISTANT
par with Assistant Engineer as both the posts had parity in the pre-revised pay
scale. Though this post was placed on par with Assistant Engineers in the pre-
revised scales of pay, they cannot be equated with Assistant Engineers who are
Professional Degree holders. However, the posts in the pre-revised scale of pay of
extend similar revision of pay scale to this post also. Accordingly, the Committee
recommends to revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.9300--34800 + Grade
PHOTO EXPERT
G.P. Rs.5400 and Thiru V. Sakthivel, Photo Expert has also requested to upgrade
the post as Chief Cameraman and to place the post in the scale of pay of Rs.15600-
-39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 as this post was similarly placed with the Cameraman,
Sound Engineer of Film Division before Fourth Tamil Nadu Pay Commission. The
Rs.5400 on par with Group-I Officers like Deputy Collector / Deputy Superintendent
the prescribed qualification to this post. Considering the similarity in the qualification
and nature of duties and responsibilities between the post of Cameraman in Tamil
Nadu Film Division and Information & Public Relations, the Committee finds
justification to place this post on par with similar posts. As this is a solitary post, the
Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.9300--34800
LABORATORY ASSISTANT
appropriate that the revision of scale of pay of Rs.5200--20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2400
ACCOUNTS OFFICER
Tmt. A.S. Vijayakumari, Accounts Officer and other individuals have requested to
revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 to
Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.7600 on par with Divisional Engineers as both the posts
were placed identical in pre-revised scales of pay. The Accounts Officers cannot
claim pay parity with the Engineering Graduates and in as much as the scale of pay
of the Divisional Engineers have been restored to its original level by the
Tmt. R. Kavitha, Deputy Accounts Officer and four other individuals have
requested to revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.15600--39100 + G.P.
Engineers. Considering the hierarchical set up of this post, the Committee finds that
comparison with Engineering Graduates is not appropriate and doest not merit
Accounts Officer as Accounts Officer without any change in the existing scale of pay
AUDIT ASSISTANT
requested to revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.5200--20200 + G.P.
Fund Audit and similar posts in other departments. The Director General of
Highways Department has also brought to the notice of the Committee that this post
has earlier been placed at Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 on par with Assistant in
Ministerial Service and the scale of pay of Assistant in Ministerial Service has been
subsequently revised as Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 and such revision has not
been extended to this post. Therefore, it has been requested to state the
applicability of the revised scale of pay to this post. The Committee has considered
and the pay parity enjoyed with the post of Assistant in Tamil Nadu Ministerial
Service and recommends to revise the scale of pay of Audit Assistants from
Tamil Nadu and some other individuals holding this post have requested to revise
the scale of pay of this post as Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.7600 on par with
Executive Engineer. It is observed that this post has been placed in the revised
G.P. Rs.6600 based on the recommendations of One Man Commission, 2010 and
the Head Draughting Officers continue to draw the higher pay scale of Rs.15600--
39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 due to the ‘Interim Stay’ granted by the Hon’ble High Court in
the Writ Petition filed by the Tamil Nadu Draughting Officers Association. As the
Hon’ble High Court has granted ‘Interim Stay’ on the implementation of the
G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 26--02--2011 only to the
Appellants, the Committee has reviewed the entire Government Order and
concluded that placing these posts at Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 on par with
G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26.02.2011. The Committee
also recommends to the Government to take necessary steps to vacate the ‘Interim
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
124
INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES
The Tamil Nadu Factory Inspectors’ Association has requested to retain the
re-designate this post as Inspector of Factories. The Committee is of the view that
and as ordered in G.O. Ms. No. 290, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated:
26-08-2010. It is observed that the post of Deputy Chief Inspector of Factories and
G.P. Rs.6600 respectively and then restored to the original level pay scale of
Finance (PC) Department, dated: 26-2-2011. As the Hon’ble High Court has granted
dated: 26—2--2011 only to the Appellants, the Committee has reviewed the entire
Government Order and concluded that placing the Deputy Chief Inspector of
appropriate and that the Executive Engineers in Public Works Department have also
retain the original pay scale recommended by the Official Committee in Pay Band-3
place the post of Inspector of Factories in the appropriate revised scales of pay of
DRAUGHTSMAN GRADE--III
to revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs. 5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 to
Public Works Department and Highways. Further, it has been requested to upgrade
qualification, duties and responsibilities attached to the post are equal to that of the
prior to the revision recommended by the One Man Commission, 2010 as Rs.9300--
the scale of pay of this post from Rs.5200—20200 + Grade Pay of Rs.2800 to
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
127
the entry level post as Assistant Photographer and also to revise the scale of pay of
(erstwhile Additional Chief Photographer) has requested to revise his scale of pay as
Additional Chief Photographer and also requested time bound promotion. It may be
stated that based on the recommendations of One Man Commission the scales of
The individuals holding the post of Photographer have pointed out that the
2010 is not satisfactory and in fact the Assistant Photographer who have rendered
20-25 years of service have since been re-designated as Junior Photographer and
those who have rendered more than 35 years of service have been re-designated as
retain their status and to create new promotional avenues by relaxing the
Committee finds that in the case of Additional Chief Photographer, this post was
Photographer which has downgraded the status does not seem to be appropriate.
Hence, the Committee recommends to retain its original nomenclature of the post of
ELECTRONICS ENGINEER
justification to place this post on par with Junior Engineer in Public Works
G.P. Rs.2800 to Rs.9300--34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4200 on par with the Junior
Grade Pay Rs.2800 to Rs.9300--34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4200 and that similar
revision is also made to these posts in Public Works and Highways Department.
Hence, the Committee recommends that the above revision of scale of pay may
LABORATORY ASSISTANT
The Principal, M.G.R. Government Film and Television Training Institute has
revised for the post of Laboratory Assistant ordered in G.O.Ms.No. 63, Finance (PC)
Tamil Nadu Film Division as the nomenclature of this post has been mentioned as
revise the scale of pay of Laboratory Assistant in M.G.R. Film Division. Hence, the
SUPERVISOR
revise the scale of pay of the post of Supervisor on par with Overseer in Stationary
observes that there is justification to place this post on par with Overseers in
+ G.P. Rs.4600 as this post has been equally placed with the Supervisor in
place this post in the scale of pay of Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4500 on par with
Top Senior Foreman in Stationery and Printing Department. The Committee finds
justification to place this post on par with their counterparts in Stationery and Printing
Department. The Committee accordingly recommends that the scale of pay of Top
SENIOR FOREMAN
place this post in the scale of pay of Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4400 on par with
131
justification to place this post on par with their counterparts in Stationery and Printing
JUNIOR FOREMAN
revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 to
Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4200 on par with Junior Foreman in Stationery and Printing
justification to extend similar revision to the Junior Foreman in Information and Public
G.P. Rs.4200.
place this post on par with Technical Assistant in Stationery and Printing Department
One Man Commission, 2010. However, it is noticed that the post of Technical
G.P. Rs.2800. Hence, the Committee finds no justification to place this post at
132
MACHINE OPERATOR
place the Machine Operator at Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2600 on par with similar
post in Stationery and Printing Department. It is observed that the scale of pay of
One Man Commission, 2010. Hence the Committee finds justification to extend
similar revision to the above post. Accordingly, the Committee recommends that the
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
134
Industries & Commerce Department have requested to retain the scale of pay of
these posts at Rs. 15600-- 39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 as ordered in G.O. Ms. No.288,
qualification prescribed to these posts. It is noticed that these posts were granted the
Public Works Department. The enhanced scale of pay granted to the Assistant
Engineers at Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs. 5400 was extended to this post by the
26--02--2011. The Committee has however reviewed the above said orders
Rs.5100. Therefore, the Committee finds it appropriate to place these posts on par
G.P. Rs.5100.
135
CHEMIST
Tmt. K.R. Vanaja, Chemist Grade-I have requested to place this post in the scale of
Department as they were in the same time scale of pay in the pre-revised scale of
pay. It is observed that qualification for direct recruitment is M.Sc. (Chemistry) and
considering the P.G. qualification this post was enjoying parity with Assistant
justification to restore the pay parity with Assistant Engineers. Accordingly, the
Industries & Commerce Department has requested to revise the scale of pay of
these posts on par with Trade Posts in others departments. The issue regarding
revision of scale of pay of the entry level Trade Posts re-designated as Skilled
Finance (PC) Department, dated: 26—8—2010 has been examined under Trade
has been made to place the Grade—II posts at Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2400.
The above scale of pay recommended to Grade—II posts is also applicable to these
posts.
136
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
137
and various other Associations and individuals have requested to place the post in
the Pay Band-3 at Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 and to re-designate the post as
Administrative Officer. It is observed that this post has been placed in the revised
to revise the pay of Sheristadar Category-I (District Court, Chief Judicial Magistrate
Court, City Civil Court, Labour Court, Family Court) from Rs.9300--34800 +
recommends similar revision to Bench Clerk Grade-I (District Court), Manager (Other
than High Court) and Administrative Officer posts also with no change in the existing
requested to place these posts in Pay Band-2 at Rs.9300--34800+ G.P. Rs.4900 and
to grant 5% of basic pay as personal pay. The Tamil Nadu Junior Bailiff Association,
Tamil Nadu Civil Court Process Servers Association, Tamil Nadu Judicial Ministerial
Officers Association and several other individuals have requested to place the above
138
post at Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 on par with Junior Assistants in Tamil Nadu
Ministerial Service. The Committee noticed that these posts were enjoying parity
with the Junior Assistants in Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service. Hence, the Committee
recommends that the scale of pay of the above posts be revised from Rs.5200--
The Registrar General, High Court of Madras has requested to grant the
monetary benefit from 1.8.2010 for the revision of scale of pay given to Assistant in
High Court including the Office of the Official Assignee, Madurai Bench of Madras
High Court on par with Assistant in Tamil Nadu Secretariat Service from Rs.5200--
20200 + G.P. Rs. 2200 to Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2400. It is noticed that based
with monetary effect from 1.8.2010 and in orders issued subsequently, they were
given monetary effect from the date of issue from prospective date only. Hence, the
Committee finds no justification to grant the above revision with retrospective effect.
However, as the Committee has elsewhere recommended to revise the scale of pay
and individuals have requested to place the post in the above posts in Pay Band--2
Nadu Judicial Ministerial Officers Association has requested to place the above
posts in the Pay Band-2 at Rs.9300--34800+ G.P. Rs.4900 and to upgrade the post
as Grade--I Bench Clerk. The Committee observes that this post has already been
139
placed on par with Assistants of Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service. Hence, the
the scale of pay of Bench Clerk (Additional District Court) / Bench Clerk, Grade--III
The Registrar, High Court has sent a proposal to revise the scale of these
par with Junior Assistant in Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service. The Committee finds
that the above posts were placed on par with Junior Assistant / Typist / Record
Committee recommends that the pay hike granted to Despatch Assistant / Record
The Registrar, High Court has sent proposal to revise the scale of pay of the
post of Librarian in Tamil Nadu State Judicial Academy from Rs.9300--34800 + G.P.
High Court. The Committee finds that this post is placed on par with Librarian
rules that the Librarian in High Court can be appointed on deputation to the Tamil
Nadu State Judicial Academy, then there is no bar to extend the scale of pay of
Librarian in High Court. Hence, the Committee recommends to place the matter to
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
qualification, mode of recruitment, nature of duties and responsibilities attached to
141
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
142
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
Sl. Name of the Post Existing Scale of pay Requested Scale of pay
No. + Grade pay + Grade pay
(Rs.) (Rs.)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
1 Soap Chemist 5200--20200 + 1900 9300--34800 + 4200
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
qualification, mode of recruitment, nature of duties and responsibilities attached to
the above said post and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scale of pay is not warranted.
143
LABOUR
LABOUR OFFICER
(erstwhile Deputy Inspector of Labour)
individuals have requested to revise the scale of pay of this post as Rs.15600--
39100 + G.P. Rs.5100 on par with Tahsildar / Block Development Officer. The
Committee has observed that this post has been placed in the pre-revised scale of
Subsequently, the One Man Commission, 2010 has recommended to revise the
upgraded scale of pay of Rs.7500—12000 taking note of the fact that the feeder
category of this post viz. Assistant Inspector of Labour has been placed on par with
the view that the categories which were already placed at Rs.9300—34800 +
revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4900 to
Tamil Nadu Local Fund Audit Service Association has requested to revise the
scale of pay of this post as Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.5100 on par with Inspector
of Police. The Committee has observed that this post has been placed in the pre-
revised scale of pay of Rs.6500—10500 and placed in the revised scale of pay of
par with Tahsildar and Block Development Officer. The Committee has elsewhere
recommended to elevate the scale of pay of the categories i.e. promotional posts to
G.P. Rs.5100.
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
146
MUSEUM DEPARTMENT
CURATOR
revise the scale of pay of Curator on par with their counterparts in Central
Rs.6600. Considering the Post Graduate qualification prescribed to this post and
Commission, 1998 regarding revision of scale of pay of this post in the pre-revised
to this post are not much, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of the
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
Sl. Name of the Post Existing Scale of pay Requested Scale of pay
No. + Grade pay + Grade pay
(Rs.) (Rs.)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
1 Artist Modeler 5200-20200 + 2400 9300-34800 + 4200
2 Taxidermist Grade-I 5200-20200 + 2400 9300-34800 + 4600
3 Taxidermist Grade-II 5200-20200 + 1800 9300-34800 + 4200
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
147
CO-OPERATIVE SUB-REGISTRAR
requested to revise the scale of pay of the post of Cooperative Sub-Registrar in Milk
and Dairy Development has brought to notice of the Committee that the
department of Cooperation and they have forego the lien in their parent department
and are placed in the revised scale of pay of Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4500 as
against the pre-revised scale of pay of Rs.5900—9900 on par with similar post in
One Man Commission, 2010 have not been extended to the similar post in Milk
Production and Dairy Development. The Committee has observed that the post of
SENIOR INSPECTOR
requested to revise the scale of pay of the post of Senior Inspector in Milk
and Dairy Development has brought to the notice of the Committee that the
foregone their lien in parent department and placed in the revised scale of pay of
based on the recommendations of the One Man Commission, 2010 has not been
extended to this post in Milk Production and Dairy Development. The Committee has
observed that the post of Senior Inspector in Milk Production and Dairy
the Committee finds justification to revise the scale of pay of Senior Inspector in Milk
recommends to revise the scale of pay of Senior Inspector in Milk Production and
the notice of the Committee that these posts are filled by direct recruitment or by
transfer. The qualification prescribed for Assistant Dairy Officer is M.Sc. or B.Sc. with
149
Dairy Technology or Dairy Husbandry and for Veterinary Assistant Surgeon is B.Vsc.
and requested to issue suitable orders extending the higher scale of pay of
Assistant Surgeon, as these posts are identically placed on par with Veterinary
method of recruitment of these posts and pay parity with the post of Veterinary
justification to revise the scale of pay of Assistant Dairy Officer / Veterinary Assistant
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
150
AUTOMOBILE ENGINEER
has requested to restore the revised scale of pay of Rs.15600-39100 + G.P. Rs.6600
ordered in G.O. Ms. No.305, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26—8—2010 to
this post. It is noticed that this post was placed in the revised scale of pay of
based on the recommendations of One Man Commission, 2010 and then restored to
original level pay scale of Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.5400. Considering the fact
that the “Interim Stay” granted on the operation of G.O.Ms. No. 71, Finance (Pay
Committee has reviewed the entire Government Order and concluded that placing
G.P. Rs.5400 as recommended by the Official Committee, 2009 and also as ordered
G.P. Rs.5400 ordered in G.O. Ms. No.305, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated:
Technical Assistant has requested to revise the Grade Pay as Rs.6,600/- on par
with Automobile Engineer as he is getting only Rs.600/- increase than his 22 years
151
junior. It is noticed that the scales of pay of these posts has been subsequently
Cell) Department, dated: 26--02--2011. The Committee has reviewed the orders
issued in G.O. Ms. No. 71, Finance (PC) Department, dated: 26--02--2011
elsewhere and recommended to place the post of Assistant Engineer & other
equivalent posts in Pay Band—2 instead of Pay Band—3 with an enhanced Grade
Pay. Therefore, the Committee feels it appropriate to place the posts of Technical
Department.
OFFICE MANAGER
Motor Vehicles Maintenance Department have requested to revise the scale of pay
General Foreman/ Technical Assistant as both the posts were identically placed in
the pre-revised scales of pay. The committee noticed that this post has been placed
34800 + G.P. Rs.4900. Hence, the Committee finds justification to place this post on
Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of Office Manger from Rs.9300--
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
153
MEDICAL EDUCATION
The Dialysis Technicians have requested to revise the scale of pay of the post
requested to revise the scale of pay of the post of Dialysis Technician Grade-I as
Grade—II and placed equally with Laboratory Supervisor in the pre-revised scale of
were placed in the revised scale of pay of Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 equal
prescribed to this post. This scale revision has not been extended to the posts of
Dialysis Technician Grade-II and Grade—I though the qualification prescribed for
these posts are similar. As this is an omission, the Committee finds justification to
place these posts on par with Laboratory Technician Grade—II and Grade—I.
Accordingly, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of the post of
34800 + G.P. Rs.4200 and the pay of its promotion post Dialysis Technician Grade-I
154
Rs.4400.
Hospital has requested to revise his pay on par with his counterparts in Public Works
Department. It is noticed that the individual holding the post of Assistant Engineer
District Workshop (Health) Villupuram working under Tamil Nadu State Health
However, the scale of pay granted to the post of Assistant Engineers based on the
individual due to the absence of specific orders. The Committee has elsewhere
with an enhanced Grade Pay of Rs.5100 above their counterparts in Central Public
G.P. Rs.5100. Accordingly, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay
in Public Works Department. This revision of pay may also be made applicable to all
Association and some individuals have requested to revise the scale of pay of
155
these posts as Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 above the level of its feeder
category Laboratory Technician Grade-I. These posts have been placed on higher
scale of pay than the Laboratory Technician Grade--I both in the pre-revised scale of
pay and in the revised scale of pay. However, the One Man Commission, 2010 has
+ G.P. Rs.4400. It is observed that these posts have been placed in the revised
Grade--I has been placed in Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 as against the pre-
both the promotional posts and feeder category post have been placed in the same
training to the students in the faculty of MBBS, DMLT, Nursing, Pharmacy and
Para Medical, which is an anomaly. Considering the above facts, the Committee
finds justification to place these posts in the revised scale of pay of Rs.9300—
scale of pay of this post as Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 considering the Post
Graduate qualification of M.Sc., (Chemistry) and nature of work and also requested
observed that this post has been placed in the revised scale of pay of Rs.9300—
156
one level above the scale of pay of its feeder category viz. Laboratory Supervisor/
of the association to sanction Risk Allowance has not been considered by this
Committee.
have requested to place this post above the scale of pay of Laboratory Technician
Grade—I. As the One Man Commission, 2010 has recommended to revise the scale
Technician which was all along placed on a higher scale of pay. The Director of
Public Health and Preventive Medicine and Health and Family Welfare department
has also forwarded the representation of the individuals to this Committee for its
consideration. It is observed that this post has been placed in the revised scale of
is one of the feeder category to this post has been placed equal to the promotion
prescribed to this post and subsequent revision of pay made to its feeder category
G.P. Rs.4500. Accordingly, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of
REFRIGERATION OPERATOR.
The Director, Medical Education with due endorsement by Health and Family
Welfare Department has requested to issue suitable orders on the applicable scale
prescribed for this post is Minimum General Educational qualification with a Trade
placed in the revised scale of pay of Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs. 1900 as against the
work, this post comes under Trade category and has to be designated as Skilled
pay of entry level Grade-II Trade posts re-designated as Skilled Assistant Grade—II
Department.
Dr. L.Umadevi, Retired Medical Officer and others have brought to notice of the
Committee that as per G.O.Ms.No.354, Health & Family Welfare Department, dated:
Whereas, the Medical Officers / Professors who has rendered more than 25 to 30
years of service and retired prior to 23—10—2009 were placed in the Pay Band – III
Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 and their minimum basic pension has been fixed
benefit ordered in the above said Government Order to those who have retired
present need for Doctors, availability for recruitment etc. Accordingly, orders were
Health & Preventive Medicine / Medical & Rural Health Services / ESI / Other
institutions and also the Medical Officers working in Medical College Hospitals,
Institutions and dispensaries and fix their pay in the respective Pay Band + Grade
159
Pay with effect from the date of issue of order i.e. 23—10—2009. Hence, the request
of the retired Medical Officers / Professors extending the benefits ordered in the
above Government Order does not comes under the purview of the terms of
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
26. Nursing Assistants Grade-I and 4800—10000 + 1650/ On par with their counterparts
Grade-II (Male and Female) 1400 in Rural Development
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
161
among others have requested to upgrade the post of Junior Administrative Officer
as Administrative Officer and to fix appropriate scale of pay pointing out the fact that
the Administrative Officers in Public Health Centres with 30 beds are granted
Block Hospitals and District Medical College and Hospitals with more than 30 beds
are paid lesser pay. It is noticed that the scale of pay of the Junior Administrative
Committee finds justification to extend the above revision of scale of pay to the post
revise the scale of pay of Junior Administrative Officer in Medical Services and Rural
Rs.5100 and this revision of pay may also be made applicable to similar posts in all
Medical Departments.
Tamil Nadu Government Medical Services Auxiliary Nurse Mid Wives and
Maternity Assistants Union have requested to revise the scale of pay of the posts of
Auxiliary Nurse Midwife and Maternity Assistant on par with their counterparts in
Public Health and Preventive Medicine Department. The Director of Medical and
162
Rural Health Services has also forwarded the representations of the above said
recommendations of Official Committee, 2009 these posts have been placed in the
revised scale of pay Rs. 5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2000 as against the pre-revised
scale of pay of Rs.3200—4900 on par with similar post in Public Health and
Preventive Medicine Department. The One Man Commission, 2010 has observed
that the nature of duties of the Village Health Nurses are onerous in the field and
rendering utmost service such as Maternal Care (Ante natal, Intra natal, Post natal),
recommended to revise the scale of pay of the Village Health Nurse, Auxiliary Nurse
Education and Medical & Rural Health Services the above revision of pay was
facts, the Committee finds justification to extend the above revision of pay to the
similar posts in Medical Education and Medical & Rural Health Services.
Accordingly, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of the posts of
Village Health Nurse (Erstwhile Female Multipurpose Health Worker), Auxiliary Nurse
Midwife and Maternity Assistants in Medical Education and Medical and Rural
Rs.2400 on par with similar posts in Public Health and Preventive Medicine
Department.
163
Dr. P. Kaliyappan in their representation have stated that the qualification for entry
and recruited through Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission. The existing scale of
pay of this post is no way commensurate with the qualification and the Radiation
hazards involved in discharging their duties. Many of the incumbents even after
been requested to extend the Dynamic Assured Career Progression to them as that
does not come under the purview of this Committee. However, considering the
qualification and risk factors faced by the Radiological Physicists the Committee
recommends that this issue may be examined at Government level based on the
ORTHOPTIST
Medical College and Hospital, Madurai has requested to revise the scale of pay of
the qualification prescribed for these posts are one and the same and the
not been extended to the post of Orthoptist. Therefore, she has requested to revise
34800 + G.P. Rs.4200. It is noticed that the One Man Commission, 2010 taking into
account the fact that the Sixth Central Pay Commission has recommended to place
the entry level para medical categories with Diploma qualification in the
Pay Band—2 with Grade Pay of Rs.4,200/- and therefore recommended to revise
G.P. Rs.4200. Whereas, the post of Orthoptist in Ophthalmic Wing has been
G.P. Rs.4200. This revision of pay may also be extended to the similar post in
Store Officer (Retd.) Welfare Association and some individuals have requested to
revise the scale of pay of the post of Medical Store Officer as Rs.15600—39100 +
G.P. Rs.5400 considering the fact that it is the second level and last promotion post
of Pharmacist. They have also pointed out that their nature of duties and
responsibilities are more than the Ministerial Superintendent and equal to that of
Medical Officers in Medical Colleges attached with Hospitals and the employees
holding this post are in charge of Medicines valued more than one crore to 10 crores.
The Director, Medical and Rural Health Services has also forwarded the
Further, Thiru A. Pelavendran, Medical Store Officer, Institute of Child Health and
165
Hospital for Children, Egmore, Chennai has filed W.P.No.11144 of 2011 with a
pay anomaly in respect of the post of Medical Store Officer. The Hon’ble High
Court in its order dated: 12—6—2012 in the above said Writ Petition has disposed
off the petition with a direction to the petitioner to send his representation to Pay
Official Committee, 2009 the revised scale of pay of this post has been fixed at
Rs.5900--9900 notionally with effect from 1—1--2006 with monetary benefit from
1-1-2007. It is pointed out that this post was earlier placed on a higher scale of pay
than the Ministerial Superintendents in the pre-revised scale of pay and the
Pharmacists get their promotion as Medical Store Officer at the verge of their
retirement based on the arising vacancy. Based on the One Man Commission,
Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4200, the next level promotion post of Chief Pharmacist
scale of pay have also been revised from Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4300 to
Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4400 and the first level promotion post of the
Radiographer viz. Chief X-Ray Technician in Radiology wing has been revised from
the above facts, the Committee finds justification to place the post of Medical Store
recommends to revise the scale of pay of the post of Medical Store Officer from
revision of pay may be made applicable to similar post in the Directorate of Medical
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
168
has brought to notice of the Committee that though the scales of pay of the
Laboratory Technician Grade—I and Grade—II have been revised based on the
Corporation Hospitals and ESI Hospitals could not avail the benefit of pay revision
as there is no specific order. Further, Thiru S. Ram Mohan holding the post of
Laboratory Technician Grade—I in Food Analysts Laboratory, King Institute has filed
W.P.No. 27546 of 2011 with a request to fix his pay equal to the post of Laboratory
dated: 26—8—2010. The Hon’ble High Court in its order dated:02—12—2011 has
directed to pass orders on the request of the petitioner. The Director, Public Health
& Preventive Medicine has also forwarded the representations of the above said
Medical Education, Medical and Rural Health Services, Public Health & Preventive
Medicine and the Laboratory Technicians in Water / Food Analysts wing under King
Institute are one and the same. The revised scale of pay of these posts have been
169
respectively notionally with effect from 1—1--2006 with monetary benefit from
1--1—2007. The One Man Commission, 2010 has recommended to revise the
Medical Education and Medical and Rural Health Services. The Committee finds that
it was merely an omission while issue of orders in respect of revision of scale of pay
of the Laboratory Technicians in other medical branches and therefore there seems
to be no need to examine this issue further. However, the Committee is of the view
to extend the above revision of pay uniformly to all the Laboratory Technician
stating that the revision of pay ordered in G.O.Ms.No.296, Finance (PC) Department,
Grade—II who were placed in the pre-revised scales of pay of Rs. 4500—7000 /
Rs.2800 and Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 with effect from 1—1—2006 under
the control of Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Transport Medical
Thiru S. Baskaran and some other individuals have sought for revision of scale of
with Laboratory Technician. Grade—II. The Director, Public Health and Preventive
Medicine has also forwarded the representations of the association. It is noticed that
the scale of pay of Laboratory Technician Grade—III has been revised as Rs.5200—
However, it is observed that the Laboratory Assistants in Schools and Colleges filled
were granted higher scale of pay of Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 notionally with
effect from 1-1-2006 with monetary benefit from 1—3--2011. Accordingly, orders
(one year duration course) have been placed in the revised scale of pay of
the scale of pay of the Laboratory Technicians Grade—III on par with Laboratory
OPHTHALMIC ASSISTANT
Nadu Senior Ophthalmic Assistants Association have requested to revise the scale
have been accepted in One Man Commission, 2010 in respect of posts under
Medical Department viz. Scientific Officer, Junior Entomologist which were re-
pointed out by the Association that in the State of Punjab, Haryana and Kerala the
Special Allowance / Risk Allowance and Rural Allowance of Rs.1000/- and Rs.500/-
respectively. The Director, Public Health and Preventive Medicine has forwarded the
that the Ophthalmic Assistants are the key persons for success of the Programmes
of Free Eye Camp Programme of Government. All duties are performed by this
cadre and they are qualified to identify nature cataract cases and mobilize them for
with similar post in other States. The Health and Family Welfare Department has
in turn transferred the proposal of Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine
place all the para medical posts with Diploma qualification at Rs.9300—34800 +
G.P. Rs.4200. Accordingly, the existing scale of pay recommended to the post of
the scale of pay of this post and sanction of Allowances has not been considered by
the Committee. However, the Committee has examined the request of the
172
the recommendations of the Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine and
issue.
pointed out that this post is a teaching post so as to conduct one and half years and
one year training course to the Sector Health Nurse (Female) and Multipurpose
Health Worker. (Male). Apart from the teaching responsibilities she is bound to do
field visits such as educating the antenatal and postnatal mothers, guiding and
counseling the adolescent girls in school and other essential measures taken to
overcome the protein energy malnourished children. She has requested to revise
the scale of pay of this post as Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 as this is a single
post in the entire State. The Director, Public Health and Preventive Medicine has
also forwarded her representation to Government which has been remitted to the
Committee for consideration. It is noticed that the request of the individual has been
rejected by One Man Commission, 2010 on the ground that this post has been
placed on par with B.T. Assistant at Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4400 as against the
Commission, 2010, the Government has issued orders revising the scale of pay of
B.T. Assistant as Rs. 9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4600. Therefore, the Committee finds
justification to revise the scale of pay of the post of Domestic Science Teacher as
Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.9300—34800
Nurses Association and some individuals have pointed out that most of the
individuals holding this post have already reached Selection Grade/ Special Grade
as this is a block level post. Therefore, the associations have requested to revise
the scale of pay of this post as Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.5400. It is noticed that
the scale of pay of the abovesaid posts have been revised as Rs.9300—34800 +
G.P. Rs. 4300 notionally with effect from 1—1—2006 with monetary benefit from
the scale of pay of the posts of Block Health Supervisor / Community Health Nurse
Committee that these posts were earlier placed identical to the post of Block
Extension Educator in Family Welfare Department for whom the scale of pay was
Hence, the Committee considering the duties and responsibilities attached to these
posts in Block Level and the pay parity with the post of Block Extension Educator in
the pre-revised scales of pay, recommends to revise the scale of pay of Block Health
Sanitarian and some individuals have pointed out that most of the individuals
holding this post have already reached Selection Grade/ Special Grade and this
post is a block level post and over all District Level Supervision in monitoring the
revise the scale of pay of the above posts as Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.7600 or
G.P. Rs.5400. Health and Family Welfare Department has also forwarded the
that the scale of pay of this post has been revised as Rs.9300—34800 + G.P.
Rs.4500 notionally with effect from 1--1—2006 with monetary benefit from
above the scale of pay of Superintendents in Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service in the
pre-revised scale of pay. The One Man Commission, 2010 has recommended for
revision of scale of pay of the feeder category viz. Health Inspector Grade—I from
Senior Sanitarian has been left omitted for revision of pay. Now, it has been
brought to notice of the Committee that the individuals holding the feeder post are
drawing more pay than the individuals in the promotion post consequent on the
revision of Selection Grade / Special Grade scales of pay due to the revision of
175
Ordinary Grade scale of pay made based on the One Man Commission,2010
posts in Block Level, the Committee finds justification to revise the scale of pay of
The Port Health Officer, Nagapattinam has pointed out that Thiru M.A. Abdul
Office, Nagapattinam since 1990. Therefore, he has requested to revise the scale of
pay of this post on par with the Health Inspectors of the Central Port Health
Health Inspector (Port). The Director, Public Health and Preventive Medicine has
also recommended and forwarded the request of the individual to Government which
in turn was transmitted to this Committee for consideration. It is noticed that the
Senior Inspectors in Local Bodies and Health Inspectors have been revised from
observed that the entire salary is fully reimbursed by Government of India in respect
of this post and only two posts are in existence in Port Health Office, Nagapattinam.
Considering the above facts, the Committee finds justification to revise the scale of
pay of the Health Assistant on par with Sanitary Inspectors. Accordingly, the
Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of Health Assistant in Port Health
176
G.P. Rs.4200 duly re-designating the post as Sanitary Inspector (Port Health).
Tamil Nadu Public Health Department Maternal and Child Health Officers
Association have requested to revise the scale of pay of this post as Rs.15600—
39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 on par with Assistant Director (SBHI), Administrative Officer
and Senior Entomologist. In support of their request, the association has pointed out
that the Maternal and Child Health Officers have been placed on a higher scale of
pay than the Ministerial Superintendent in the pre-revised scale of pay. Health and
Family Welfare Department has also forwarded the representation of the association
along with the proposal received from the Director of Public Health & Preventive
Medicine for consideration of this Committee. It is noticed that the One Man
Commission, 2010 has rejected the request of the association on the wrong notion
that the District Maternal and Child Health Officer is the feeder category to the
Maternal and Child Health Officers. However, it is brought to the notice of the
Committee that both these posts are having equal responsibilities and same scale of
pay of Rs. 9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4500 and the Maternal and Child Health Officer
Health and Family Welfare Department, dated: 31—01—2006. The association has
pointed out that they were drawing more pay than the Ministerial Superintendents in
the pre-revised scale of pay and therefore requested enhancement in their pay
scale. It is pointed out that this post cannot be compared with the post of Ministerial
Maternal and Child Health Officers and higher status enjoyed in the earlier Pay
177
Commission scales of pay, the Committee, finds justification to revise place the
scale of pay of the post of Maternal and Child Health Officers at Rs. 9300—34800 +
G.P. Rs.4700. Accordingly, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of
Maternal & Child Health Officers from Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs. 4500 to
The Tamil Nadu Government Village Health Nurse Association, Tamil Nadu
Government All Health Nurses Association, Lady Health Visitors Welfare Association,
Tamil Nadu Municipality and Corporation Sector Health Nurses Welfare Association
and some individuals holding the post of Sector Health Nurse have requested to
revise the scale of pay of the post of Sector Health Nurse as Rs. 9300—34800 + G.P.
Rs.4450 + Nursing Allowance of Rs.500 / - pm. on par with Staff Nurse. As the
duties and responsibilities of the post of Sector Health Nurse is similar to that of Staff
Nurse and rendered service in the remote villages. The Tamil Nadu Government
Medical Department (DFW, DMS, DME, ESI) Health Supervisors and Thunai
their representation has brought to notice of the Committee that the post of Lady
Health Visitors working in the Government Hospitals, District T.B. Centres under the
Services and Director of Family Welfare have not been re-designated as Sector
26--8—2010 relates to Public Health and Preventive Medicine Department only and
qualification, nature of duties and responsibilities of the posts of Staff Nurse and
Sector Health Nurse, the Committee finds no justification to consider the request of
178
the association to maintain pay parity with Staff Nurse. Further, it is observed that the
One Man Commission, 2010 has recommended to re-designate the post of Lady
Health Visitor working in the Directorate of Medical and Rural Health Services /
Health Nurse without any change in the existing scale of pay of Rs.9300—34800 +
Department only and therefore it is necessary to issue suitable orders to this effect in
scales of pay with common nomenclature of the post as “Sector Health Nurse”.
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
180
FAMILY WELFARE
DEMOGRAPHER
Tamil Nadu Family Welfare Statistical Officials Association has pointed out
that the post of Demographer is the head of Demographic and Evaluation Cell of
Family Welfare Department and this post is a unique and State Level Post which
progress of the schemes in the State. They have also pointed out that this post was
placed identical to the post of Deputy Director of Medical and Rural Health Services
and Family Welfare upto Third Pay Commission scales of pay and the Family
posts are met from Government of India funds. In most of the States, the post of
Tamil Nadu only it has been placed below the rank of Deputy Director. Therefore,
the association has requested to revise the scale of pay of this post from
enhance the Grade Pay of this post considering the nature of work and
responsibilities attached to this post and which is a solitary post. Accordingly, the
G.P. Rs.6600 on par with Deputy Directors in Medical and Rural Health Services by
Official’s Union and Tamil Nadu Government Family Welfare All Officials Federation
and other individuals have requested to revise the scale of pay of Block Health
Further, Tvl A. Deivasikamani and R. Rajaadurai holding the post of Block Health
Statistician in Family Welfare Department have filed Writ Petition Nos. 28951 of
2010 and 3803 of 2011 with a request to direct the respondents to revise their scale
dated: 26—8—2010 as in the case of other Block level posts viz. Block Health
Family Welfare has also forwarded the requests of the association for consideration
Committee, 2009 this post has been placed on par with Ministerial Assistant and
20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 to Rs. 5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2800, the Committee finds
justification to extend the above scale revision to this post also. Accordingly, the
Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of Block Health Statistician from
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
183
G.P. Rs.8700 to the posts of Principal / Joint Director of Indian Medicine considering
observed that this post has been placed in the Pay Band--3 at Rs.15600—39100 +
recommendations of One Man Commission, 2010, the scale of pay of Joint Director /
67000 + G.P. Rs.8700 notionally with effect from 1--1--2006 with monetary benefit
from 1—8—2010. The above scale of pay was downgraded to the original level pay
scale of Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.7600 in G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell)
Department, dated: 26—02--2011. As the Hon’ble High Court has granted ‘Interim
Stay’ on the implementation of the G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department,
dated: 26—02—2011, the Joint Directors / Principals continue to draw the higher
scale of pay. It is observed that the One Man Commission, 2010 has endorsed the
scale of pay of District Siddha Medical Officer and Deputy Directors as Rs.15600—
39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 and Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.7600 respectively, the post of
Joint Director / Principal has been rightly revised from Rs.15600—39100 + G.P.
Rs.7600 to Rs.37400—67000 + G.P. Rs.8700 on par with the Joint Directors of Medical
Departments. The Committee has reviewed the entire Government Order dated:
184
26—2—2011 and has concluded that placing Joint Director/ Principal in Pay Band-4
is appropriate since parity has been established on par with Allopathy Doctors and
hence, the One Man Commission, 2010 has placed the Joint Directors / Principal of
the Committee recommends to retain the higher pay scale recommended by the
the Joint Directors / Principals of Indian Medicine Department as ordered in G.O. Ms.
Tamil Nadu Post Graduate Siddha Doctors’ Association and Tamil Nadu
Government Siddha Doctors State Organization have requested to retain the pay
educational qualification and services rendered in Indian Medicine and also taking
Allopathy side. It is observed that these posts have been placed in the Pay Band—3
15200 by the Official Committee on par with other Deputy Directors. Subsequently,
revision granted to the District Siddha Medical Officer / Medical Officers, the scale
of pay of these posts have been revised from Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 to
monetary benefit from 1—8—2010. The above scale of pay was downgraded to the
original level of Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 in G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay
Cell) Department, dated: 26—02--2011. As the Hon’ble High Court has granted
185
“Interim Stay’ on the implementation of G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell)
draw the higher scale of pay recommended by One Man Commission, 2010. It is
observed that the One Man Commission, 2010 has recommended to revise the scale
39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 on par with Senior Civil Surgeons in the Allopathy side. In the
light of the above facts, the Committee has reviewed the G.O.Ms.No.71, Finance
(Pay Cell) Department, dated :26—02—2011 and finds that placing these posts at
One Man Commission, 2010 and as ordered in G.O.Ms.No.300, Finance (Pay Cell)
Tamil Nadu Post Graduate Siddha Doctors’ Association and Tamil Nadu
Government Siddha Doctors State Organization have requested to retain the pay
qualification and services rendered in Indian Medicine and also taking note of the
that based on Official Committee, 2009 recommendations, these posts have been
placed in the revised scale of pay of Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.5700 as against the
recommendations of the One Man Commission, 2010 the scale of pay of these posts
Rs.6600 notionally with effect from 1--1--2006 with monetary benefit from 1—8—2010.
The above revision was downgraded to the original level pay scale of Rs.15600—
39100 + G.P. Rs.5700 in G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26--02--
2011. As the Hon’ble High Court has granted “Interim Stay’ on the implementation of
G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26—02—2011, the incumbents in
the above posts continue to draw the higher scale of pay. It is noticed that
considering the fact that the entry level post of Assistant Medical Officer (Indian
Medicine) has been granted parity with Assistant Surgeons under the Allopathy side,
the One Man Commission, 2010 has appropriately recommended to place the
promotion posts of Assistant Medical Officers viz. Medical Officer, Deputy Director / Joint
Director on par with Civil Surgeon / Senior Civil Surgeon and Joint Director in Medical
Department. The Committee has reviewed the entire Government Order dated:
26—02—2011 including the revision granted to these posts and concluded that
these posts have already been placed appropriately on par with Civil Surgeons
under the Allopathy side based on the One Man Commission, 2010 recommendations.
Accordingly, the Committee recommends to retain the higher pay scale of Rs.15600--
39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 as recommended by the One Man Commission, 2010 and as
ordered in G.O. Ms. No.300, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26—8—2010.
LIBRARIAN
The Director, Indian Medicine has recommended to revise the scale of pay of
Rs.5400 on par with the Librarian in Medical Education Department as both the
posts were similarly placed in the pre-revised scale of pay. The Committee finds that
Librarian in both the departments were similarly placed in the pre-revised scale of
based on the recommendations of One Man Commission, 2010, the scale of pay of
the Librarian in Medical Education Department has been revised from Rs.9300—
STATISTICIAN
The Director, Indian Medicine has recommended to revise the scale of pay of
Pay Rs.4400 on par with similar post in Medical Education and Medical and Rural
recruitment and the pre-revised scales of pay of this post are similar and identical to
that of their counterparts in Medical Education and Medical and Rural Health
Services Department. Further, in the revised pay structure this post in both the
departments were placed at Rs.9300—34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4300 as against the pre-
revised scale of pay of Rs.5300—8300. The One Man Commission has observed
that the qualification and method of recruitment of the post of Statistician in the
Directorate of Medical Education and Public Health & Preventive Medicine are
similar to that of the post of Statistical Inspector in Economics and Statistics and
has not been included in the abovesaid recommendations of One Man Commission.
Considering the above facts, this Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay
of the Statistician in Indian Medicine and Homeopathy Department on par with the
188
THERAPEUTIC ASSISTANT
Medicine Department has requested to revise the scale of pay of the Therapeutic
on par with Masseur in Indian Medicine Department. It is noticed that the post of
Therapeutic Assistant has been granted the revised scale of pay of Rs.4800--10000
+ Grade Pay of Rs.1400 notionally with effect from 1-1-2006 with monetary benefit
recommendations of One Man Commission, the scale of pay for the post of Masseur
in Indian Medicine & Homeopathy Department has been revised from Rs.4800
--10000 + Grade Pay Rs.1400 to Rs.5200-20200 + Grade Pay Rs.1900 notionally with
effect from 1--1--2006 with monetary benefit from 1-8-2010, considering the
The qualification prescribed for the post of Therapeutic Assistant is also S.S.L.C.,
and they are given six months training in Massaging and for giving various therapies.
Considering the similarity in duties and responsibilities between the post of the
the Committee finds justification to revise the scale of pay of Therapeutic Assistant
due to the arduous physical work discharged by them at the work place and decided
to place them one level below that of Masseur who are having one year training
Certificate Course. Accordingly, the Committee recommends that the scale of pay
for the post of Therapeutic Assistant in Government Yoga & Naturopathy College be
PHARMACY ATTENDANT
working in Palayangkota Govt. Siddha Medical College have requested to revise the
scale of pay of this post from Rs. 4800--10000 + Grade Pay Rs.1400 to Rs. 5200--20200
It is observed that the nature of duties of the Pharmacy Attendants are assisting the
Pharmacist in preparing medicine with various kinds of natural medicine leafs which
creates poison while preparing medicine by way of burning and mixing. This post
cannot be compared with Masseur as their qualification is SSLC with one year
similarly placed categories, the Committee recommends that the scale of pay of this
post may be placed one level above the existing level and placed at Rs. 4800--10000
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
following categories as well:--
Existing Scale of Requested Scale of
Sl.
Name of the Post pay + Grade pay pay + Grade pay
No.
(Rs.) (Rs.)
1 Chief Pharmacist 9300--34800 + 4400 To equvate with
Medical Store Keeper
2 Pharmacy Supervisor 9300--34800 + 4300 9300--34800 + 4400
3 Masseur 5200--20200 + 1900 5200--20200 + 2600 +
Hardship Allowance
4 Transcriber 5200--20200 + 2000 5200--20200 + 2400
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
190
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
191
PUBLIC LIBRARIES
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
192
POLICE DEPARTMENT
INSPECTOR OF POLICE
few other (Retd.) Inspectors of Police have requested to issue suitable orders so as
the Official Committee, 2009 has recommended higher scale of pay Rs.9300--34800
to the post of Inspector of Police notionally with effect from 1--1--2006 with monetary
of this post Government has revised the scale of pay of the post of Inspector of
Rs.5100 notionally with effect from 12--12--2007 with monetary benefit from
1-3-2011 vide G.O.Ms.No. 71, Finance (PC) Department, dated: 26-02-2011. As the
Hon’ble High Court has granted “Interim Stay” the above scale of pay was not
implemented. Hence, the Committee has reviewed the entire Government Order
and has concluded that placing the Inspector of Police in Pay Band—3 may not be
Inspector of Police may be appropriately placed in Pay Band—2 and revised from
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
194
PRISONS
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
following categories as well:--
Existing Scale of Requested Scale of
Sl. Name of the Post pay + Grade pay pay + Grade pay
No. (Rs.) (Rs.)
1. Deputy Inspector General of 15600--39100 + 7600 37400--67000+8900
Prison
2. Superintendent of Prisons 15600--39100 + 5700 15600--39100+7600
3. Additional Superintendent of 15600--39100 + 5400 15600--39100+6600
Prison
4. Chief Probation 15600--39100 + 6600 15600--39100+7600
Superintendent
5. Regional Probation Officer 15600--39100 + 5400 15600--39100+6600
6. Probation Officer 9300 --34800 + 4800 9300--34800 + 4800
(requested notional
effect from 1-1-2006)
7. Jailor 9300 --34800 + 4800 15600--39100+5400
8. Deputy Jailor 9300 --34800 + 4600 15600--39100+5100
9. Assistant Jailor 9300 --34800 + 4200 9300--34800+4800
10. Electrical Supervisor 9300 -- 34800 + 4400 15600--39100+5100
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
qualification, mode of recruitment, nature of duties and responsibilities attached to
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
195
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
Public Works Department and Tamil Nadu Engineers Federation have requested to
it has been demanded in various Pay Commissions to grant pay scale on par with
Doctors based on the Professional qualification and having more responsibilities and
accountabilities as like Doctors and which has been considered after a long gap of 40
granted the revised scale of pay of Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4700 which is the
Subsequently, the One Man Commission,2010 has considered that the post of
Assistant Engineer is filled by direct recruitment through Tamil Nadu Public Service
Professional Degree and they may be placed on par with other professionally
Rs.5400. Further, the One Man Commission,2010 has also observed that the
Engineer if he possess a B.E. Degree who is placed equal to Assistant Engineer has
39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 which in the view of the Committee seems to be incorrect
196
since the post of Senior Draughting Officer is a second level post under Draughting
Wing and Assistant Engineer which is a entry level post under Engineering Wing
and placed under two different Wings which cannot be compared. Further on
noticed that the Assistant Engineers have been erroneously placed on par with
Assistant Director (Panchayat Raj) etc. which has led to the anomalous situation of
placing its first level and second level promotional posts of Assistant Executive
Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.7600 and therefore the Government restored the scales
of pay of Assistant Executive Engineer and Executive Engineer to its original level,
However, the Assistant Engineers were granted a new scale of pay one level below
the Group-I posts at Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.5100 reducing only Rs.300/- duly
placing the post in the same Pay Band instead of restoring it to its original level of
1) The scales of pay of the employees in every pay revision from Tamil Nadu
Fifth Pay Commission is based on the parity with similar posts in Government of
India.
placed at the section level and its promotional posts Assistant Executive Engineer is
Commission recommendations. Further, the Junior Engineers are also claiming pay
(Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.5400) as both these posts are placed at section level
and discharging the same work. The comparison with Medical Doctor is also not
Engineering line, there is a separate category of Diploma holders, who are Junior
Engineers and holding charge as ‘section in-charge’ like Assistant Engineers. The
However, the Grade Pay of Rs.5100 already fixed in G.O.Ms.No.71, Finance (PC)
difference of Rs.700/- in Grade Pay from Junior Engineer. The Committee also
recommend that the excess payments made till the issue of revised orders may be
4) It is observed that the Official Committee, 2009 had rightly placed the post
scale of pay of Rs.6500—11100. In the light of the above facts, the Committee
consider it appropriate to place the post of Assistant Engineers on par with similar
posts in Central Public Works Department and also considering the local pay
relativity among other higher posts, the Committee recommends that it would be
198
appropriate that the pay scale of Assistant Engineers may be brought down to Pay
Band--2 from Pay Band--3 and granted an enhanced Grade Pay in the scale of pay
of Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.5100 i.e. with the same Grade pay as ordered in
that the Assistant Engineer in State Public Works Department would be placed with
a difference in Grade pay of Rs.500/- in Grade Pay above the Assistant Engineers in
the Central Public Works Department. Likewise, the Committee also recommends to
place the post of Executive Engineer and Assistant Executive Engineer in the
CHIEF ARCHITECT
Chief Engineer (Buildings) in his letter dated: 09--10--2012 has requested to revise
the scale of pay of this post from Rs.37400--67000 + G.P. Rs.8900 to Rs.37400--
67000 + G.P. Rs.9500 on par with Chief Engineer. It is noticed that the pattern of
posts of Chief Engineer, Public Works Department and Chief Architect have been
with effect from 1-1-2006 and with monetary benefit from 1-1-2007. Subsequently,
the One Man Commission, 2010 has recommended to revise the scale of pay of all
as Rs.37400—67000 + G.P. Rs.9500 i.e. who were in the existing pay scale of
has been placed in the revised scale of pay of Rs.37400—67000 + G.P. Rs.8900
Rs.9500/- granted to the Chief Engineer, Public Works Department has been
recommends that the scale of pay of the post of Chief Architect may be placed on
par with Chief Engineer, Public Works Department by revising their scale of pay of
this post from Rs.37400-- 67000+ G.P. Rs.8900 to Rs.37400--67000+ G.P. Rs.9500.
JUNIOR ARCHITECT
Chief Engineer (Buildings) have requested to revise the scale of pay of this post as
Assistant Engineers. It is observed that this post has been equally placed with the
39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 granted to the post of Assistant Engineer in Public Works
Department by the One Man Commission, 2010 was not extended to this post.
Committee finds justification to place this post on par with Assistant Engineer and
Nadu have requested to revise the scale of pay of these posts on par with Assistant
and nature of work. It is observed that these posts have been placed on par with
G.P. Rs.4700 considering their Post Graduate Degree qualification. However, the
Public Works Department was not extended to this post. As the Committee has
of Pay Band—3 with an enhanced Grade Pay of Rs.5100/-, the Committee find
justification to place these posts on par with Assistant Engineer and recommends to
revise the scale of pay of these posts from Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4700 to
Works Department.
201
The employees working in the Computer Wing under Ground Water Division
of Public Works Department has requested to revise the scale of pay of this post
with the post of Assistant Executive Engineer considering the method of recruitment,
qualification and nature of work and responsibilities. It is noticed that this post has
been initially created in the year 1988 in the scale of pay of Rs.1340—2435 and
Based on the recommendations of the Official Committee, 2009 revised scale of pay
of Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 has been fixed to the post of Programmer and
39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 granted to the post of Assistant Executive Engineer has been
Cell) Department, dated: 26-2-2011 and the same has been endorsed by this
Committee. Hence, no anomaly exists in this case and the existing scale of pay of
this post is appropriate. However, the Committee recommends that the post of
Analyst in line with the general orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.339, Finance (Pay Cell)
Tamil Nadu and some other individuals holding this post have requested to revise
the scale of pay of this post as Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.7600 on par with
202
Executive Engineer. It is observed that this post has been placed in the revised
G.P. Rs.6600 based on the recommendations of One Man Commission, 2010 and
the Head Draughting Officers continue to draw the higher pay scale of Rs.15600--
39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 due to the ‘Interim Stay’ granted by the Hon’ble High Court in
the Writ Petition filed by the Tamil Nadu Draughting Officers Association. As the
Hon’ble High Court has granted ‘Interim Stay’ on the implementation of the G.O. Ms.
No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 26—02--011 only to the Appellants,
the Committee has reviewed the entire Government Order and concluded that
recommended by the Official Committee and as rightly ordered in G.O. Ms. No.71,
recommends to the Government to take necessary steps to vacate the ‘Interim Stay’
Tamil Nadu and some other individuals holding this post have requested to revise
the scale of pay of this post as Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 on par with
Assistant Engineer based on the parity enjoyed in the pre-revised scale of pay. It is
notionally with effect from 1-1-2006 with monetary benefit from 1-1-2007 as against
of this post was further revised as Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4900 notionally with
effect from 12--12--2007 with monetary benefit from 1--8--2010 by placing the post
one level above the Ministerial Superintendents corresponding to the upgraded pre-
Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26—08--2010. Hence, the Committee finds
justification to maintain the level recommended by the One Man Commission, 2010
to place this post one level above the Ministerial Superintendents on par with their
promotional posts and therefore recommends to revise the pay scale of this post
Tamil Nadu and some other individuals holding this post have requested to revise
the scale of pay of this post from Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 to Rs.9300—
Draughting Officer in both Technical Education and Public Works Department were
placed in the pre-revised scale of pay Rs.4500--7000 with the corresponding revised
qualification prescribed for this post. However, the said pay hike has not been
revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 to
Education Department and that similar revision may also be extended to this post
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
206
REGISTRATION
SUB-REGISTRAR GRADE--I
par with Tahsildar / Block Development Officer / Inspector of Police / Forest Ranger
this post has been placed on par with the promotional posts to Superintendents by
Officers in Pay Band--2, the Committee recommends to place this post on par with
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
207
REVENUE ADMINISTRATION
TAHSILDAR
Department Staff Association have requested to place the post on par with Under
Association has requested to place the post in the elevated Pay Band Rs.15600-
39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 + P.P. Rs.1000. Tamil Nadu Civil Services Association,
and several individuals have requested to retain and assure the pay fixed in the Pay
and seven other Retired Tahsildars have requested to clarify the eligibility of revised
pension to retired Tahsildars in the elevated pay scale as per G.O. Ms. No.71,
Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26—2--2011 in the light of Judgment dated
24—11--2011 in W.P.No: 7463 of 2011 and to give effect the elevated scale. Thiru
Desingu, Retired Tahsildar and four other individuals have also requested to extend
the elevated scale given to Tahsildars notionally from 1.1.2006 instead of 12.12.2007
based on the recommendations of Official Committee, the scale of pay of this post
was revised as Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4600 (notionally with effect from 1-1-2006
with monetary benefit from 1-1-2007) and revised to Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4900
(with effect from 12.12.2007) and further revised as Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4900
+ Special Allowance of Rs.1000/- with effect from 1.2.2011 vide orders issued in
monetary benefit from 1.3.2011 vide orders issued in G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay
the granting of Personal Pay of Rs.1000/- nor elevation to the Pay Band—3 at
mentioned here that several representations have been received for revision of scale
of pay of posts which were equally placed on par with Tahsildars in pre-revised scale
down the posts in the pre-revised scale of pay of Rs.6500—11100 like Assistant
Engineers in Public Works and other Engineering Departments who were granted
the scale of pay in Pay Band—3 at Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.5100 to Pay Band--2
Central Public Works Department it is imperative that the elevation made to Pay
G.O.Ms.No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26.2.2011 may also be appropriately
be brought down to Pay Band--2. Accordingly the Committee recommends that the
which may be made applicable to the other equivalent posts of Inspectors of Police,
Forest Ranger and Block Development Officers etc, who were elevated to Pay
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
210
Welfare Association and several other Associations and individuals have requested
G.P. Rs.6600. Tamil Nadu Rural Development Officials Association and Tamil Nadu
Rural Development Engineer Association have requested to place this post in the
from 1.1.2006 with monetary benefit from 1.1.2007 and subsequently revised to
notionally with effect from 1.1.2006 with monetary benefit from 1.3.2011 in
has reviewed the above Government order and recommended to place the post of
Band—3 with an enhanced Grade Pay above the Assistant Engineers in Central
Public Works Department at Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.5100 the above scale of pay
may be made applicable to this post. Likewise, the Committee also recommends to
recommended by the Official Committee, 2009 duly endorsing the orders issued by
211
Government Departments.
has requested to place the post of Block Development Officer in the Pay Band-3 at
and Tamil Nadu Developmental Services Officials Association and several other
G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated:26-2-2011 for elevation of
pay scale to the Block Development Officers under Pay Band--3 at Rs.15600--
39100+ G.P. Rs.5100 and grant the Personal Pay of Rs.1000/- as ordered earlier.
Retired Officials Association and several other Associations and individuals have
requested to extend the monetary benefit / notional effect from 1-1-2006 instead of
G.P. Rs.4600 notionally with effect from 1-1-2006 with monetary benefit from
1.1.2007 and revised as Rs.9300--34800+ G.P. Rs.4900 with monetary benefit from
Personal Pay Rs.1000 with effect from 1-2-2011 vide G.O.Ms.No.45, Finance(Pay
G.P. Rs.5100 notionally with effect from 12—12—2007 with monetary benefit from
26-2-2011. It is observed that the elevation given to this post under Pay Band-3 at
dated: 26.2.2011 has not been implemented so far due to the stay granted by the
Hon’ble High Court. Hence considering the plea made by other employees who
Development Officers / Tahsildars, the Committee noticed that these posts have to
distort the existing pay relativities of other posts who were on an identical pre-revised
scale of pay. Hence the Committee recommends to modify the orders issued in
G.O.Ms.No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 26-2-2011 to the extent that
the Block Development Officers may be placed in Pay Band-2 instead of Pay Band—
3 with same Grade Pay in the scale of pay of Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.5100 +
revision, the Committee finds no justification to consider this request as the revision
revision of scale of pay to Assistant Section Officer of Secretariat were given effect
from 12--12--2007 only based on the orders of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India
Secretariat.
Associations and individuals have requested to place this post in the Pay Band-3
Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.5700. This post has been placed in the revised scale of
213
the recommendations of One Man Commission, 2010. It is observed that this post
has been equally placed on par with Senior Draughting Officer in Public Works
G.P. Rs. 5100 one level above the Ministerial Superintendents on par with their
promotional posts considering the revised scale of pay granted as against the
Association and several other Associations and individuals have requested to revise
the scale of pay of these posts in the Pay Band-2 from Rs.5200—20200 +
Development and Panchayat Raj Department has also recommended the request of
the Association to grant such pay revision. Tamil Nadu Overseers Association has
requested to place the post in the Pay Band Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4400 on par
deputation posts and some posts have been created to absorb the Technical
was placed on par with Overseer in Public Words Department and Highways
214
Public Works Department has been considered as a supervisory post and the scale
of pay of the post has been revised as from Rs.5200-20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 to
revision may be extended to the posts of Overseer under the Rural Development /
However, based on the recommendations of One Man Commission 2010, the pay
Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4200 based on the Diploma qualification which has not
revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 to Rs.9300-
-34800 + G.P. Rs.4200 on par with Junior Draughting Officer in Technical Education
FITTER GRADE--II
and several other Associations and individuals have requested to revise the scale of
pay of the post of Fitter, Grade-II from Rs.5200--20200+ G.P. Rs.1900 to Rs.5200--
20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 on par with Junior Assistant and other equivalent posts. As
this post is a trade post the orders issued in G.O. Ms. No.338, Finance (Pay Cell)
G.P. Rs.2400. Hence, the Committee recommends that the scale of pay of this post
Grade Pay Rs.2400 on par with the entry level post of Skilled Assistant Grade-II.
ELECTRICIAN
several other Associations and individuals have requested to revise the scale of pay
Assistant etc. As this post is a trade post the orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.338,
Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26.8.2010 is applicable to this post. The
20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2400. Hence, the Committee recommends that the scale of
pay of this post may be revised from Rs.5200--20200 + Grade Pay Rs.1900 to
Rs.5200-20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2400 on par with the entry level post of Skilled
Assistant Grade-II.
216
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
217
and certain individuals have requested to revise the scale of pay of this post as
per the recommendations of One Man Commission. It is observed that this post has
been placed in the revised pay scale of Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4600 as against
the pre-revised scale of pay of Rs.6500--10500 which has been subsequently placed
recommendations of One Man Commission, 2010. However the scale of pay of this
Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26—02--2011 to the level of Tahsildar, Block
Development Officers i.e. one level below Group-I posts. As the Committee has
Tahsildars etc., in Pay Band--2 instead of Pay Band—3 with an enhanced Grade
Pay Rs.5100, the Committee recommends that pay scale of District Differently Abled
Welfare Officer may also be revised as Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.5100 and excess
pay drawn by them so far in the enhanced pay scale may be waived without effecting
any recovery.
HEAD WARDEN
Warden and Warden Welfare Association wherein they have requested to revise the
this post has been placed in the revised scale of pay of Rs.5200--20200 +
G.P. Rs.2000 as against the pre-revised scale of pay of Rs.3200--4900 on par with
20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 has not be extended to Head Warden. Hence, the Committee
finds justification to elevate the scale of pay of this post on par with their counterparts
in Police and Prisons Department and accordingly recommends that the scale of pay
for the post of Head Warden be revised from Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2000 to
AUDIOMETRICIAN
G.P. Rs.4200. Considering the higher educational qualification of degree, duties and
responsibilities attached to the post and also taking note of the fact that it is a solitary
post; the Committee finds justification to revise the scale of pay. Accordingly, the
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
220
SMALL SAVINGS
FIELD OFFICER
The Director, Small Savings has forwarded the request of the Field Officers
and requested to revise the scale of pay of the post of Field Officer on par with
make them work effectively. It is noticed that this post has been placed at Rs.1600
--2660 and at Rs.5300--8300 in the pre-revised scales of pay on par with the
Orders of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and placed in the revised pay at
Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs. 4800 as against the enhanced pre-revised scale of pay
G.O. Ms. No. 258, Finance (S.S) Department, dated: 05-07-2005, it was proposed
to amend the adhoc rules for the post of Field Officers by deleting the post of
issued till date. Pending such amendment to the adhoc rules, the earlier rule of
filling up of this post ‘by transfer’ from Superintendent of Small Savings Department
as one of the methods still holds good. Therefore, the Committee finds justification
to place this post on par with the Superintendents in Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service
recommends that the scale of pay of Field Officers in Small Savings Department
A. Gangalesh and others have requested to revise the scale of pay of this post from
noticed that in the revised scale of pay the post of Industrial Co-operative Officer
has been placed on par with their counterparts in Industries & Commerce
Co-operative Officer in Industries and Commerce has been revised from Rs.9300--
with effect from 12—12--2007 with monetary benefit from 1--8--2010. However, the
Social Welfare Department. Hence, the Committee recommends to revise the scale
Rs.15600--39100 + Grade Pay Rs.5100 (or) Rs.5400 on par with Block Development
Officer and higher than its feeder category Superintendent. It is observed that this
post has been placed one level above the Ministerial Superintendent in the
pre-revised scale of pay at Rs.5900--9900 and also in the revised scale of pay
222
has arisen due to the pay hike given to the Ministerial Superintendents as Rs.9300—
34800 + G.P. Rs.4800 one level above the Assistant Section Officer of Secretariat
Service with effect from 12—12--2007. Further, as per the existing adhoc rules, the
post of Child Development Project Officer is filled by transfer from among the
Ministerial Service. Accordingly, the Committee recommends that the scale of pay of
A. Gangalesh and others have requested to revise the scale of pay from Rs.9300
One Man Commission,2010 has revised the scale of pay of Supervisor of Industrial
Grade Pay Rs.4300 notionally with effect from 1--1--2006 with monetary benefit
from 1--8—2010 but the above revision was omitted to be extended to the similar
post in Social Welfare Department. Considering the fact that this is an omission in
revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4200 to
Rs.9300--34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4300 on par with similar post in Industries and
Commerce Department.
223
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
224
the scale of pay of the post of Planning Junior Assistant from Rs.5200--20200 +
G.P. Rs.2200 to Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 one level above that of Junior
Assts. in other Departments. It is observed that the post of Planning Junior Assistant
was placed on par with Assistant in Tamil Nadu Secretariat and granted the revised
One Man Commission, 2010 considering that the Ministerial Assistant, Junior
filled by direct recruitment through Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission with the
20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 on par with Ministerial Assistants. Subsequently, as the scale
G.P. Rs.2800, the Committee has decided to place the Planning Junior Assistant
one level above the Junior Assistants and in between Assistants in Tamil Nadu
20200 + G.P. Rs.2600. The Committee also recommends that similar revision may
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
226
The Front Office Assistants of State Guest House, Chepauk, Chennai-5 have
requested to revise the scale of pay of this post on par with that of Junior Assistants
G.P. Rs.2400. Comparison with that of Junior Assistant in Ministerial Service is quite
appropriate. Prior to the subsequent revision of scale of pay made to the post of
Junior Assistant as Rs.5200—20200 + 2400 the post of Front Office Assistant have
been identically placed with Junior Assistants. Besides, the educational qualification
of Front Office Assistant is also commensurate with that of Junior Assistant. Further,
it is also noticed that consequent on the revision of scale of pay made to the Junior
Assistants certain equally placed posts have also been revised on par with Junior
Hence, on the analogy of the revision made to Junior Assistants, the Committee
recommends to revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.5200--20200 + G.P.
ELECTRICIAN / PLUMBER
with Junior Assistant considering the technical qualification prescribed to this post.
As the Committee has elsewhere recommended to revise the scale of pay of entry
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
228
SERICULTURE
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER
Administrative Officers of other Departments. It is observed that the pay scale of this
G.P. Rs.5400 notionally with effect from 1-1-2006 with monetary benefit from
based on the recommendations of One Man Commission, 2010 which has been
Finance (PC) Department, dated: 26—2—2011 and the same has not been
implemented due to Interim Stay. However, as per the review made on the above
Government Order, the Committee finds it appropriate to place this post in the Pay
Band—2 with the Grade Pay of Rs.5100 on par with the promotional post of
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
230
PROBATION OFFICER
requested to revise the scale of pay of the post of Probation Officer from Rs.9300—
Officers have also requested to place this post in the Pay Band—3 at Rs.15600—
39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 on the grounds that they were placed higher than a
Thiru R. Sundar, Probation Officer has requested to place the post in the
Superintendent/Office Manager are the feeder category to this post. Social Welfare
B. Sathyanarayanan, Probation Officers have requested to place the post in the Pay
qualification is higher.
2) It is noticed that the Probation Officers in both Prisons and Social Defence
Departments were equally placed posts in pre-revised scales of pay and the said
anomaly has arisen due to the issue of G.O.Ms.No.310, Finance (Pay Cell)
Department, dated: 26-8-2010 in which the pay scale of Probation Officer in Prisons
Department has been revised from Rs. 9300--34800 + Grade Pay Rs.4500 to
pointed out that Superintendent in Ministerial Service has been placed one level
above the Assistant Section Officer in Secretariat Service based on Supreme Court
different when compared to this post and their scale has been reduced in
G.O.Ms.No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26--02--2011 which has been
recommends that the scale of pay of Probation Officer in Social Defence Department
requested to revise the scales of pay of the post of Chief Guard / Warden Grade--I
G.P. Rs.2400 on par with Chief Head Warder/ Warder Grade-I in Prisons
-I and to revise the scales of pay of the post as Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2900.
The post of Chief Head Warder of Prisons Department had already been placed on a
revised scale of pay of Rs.5200--20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2000 and further revised to
revise the scale of pay of Chief Guard / Warden Grade-I on par with Warder Grade-I
of Prisons Department, as both the posts were equally placed in the pre-revised
Rs.5200--20200 + Grade Pay Rs.1900 and the difference has occurred due to
Commission 2010. Hence the Committee recommends that the scale of pay of Chief
Guard / Warden Grade-I may be revised from Rs.5200--20200 + Grade Pay Rs.1900
Assistant as Warden Grade-II or Supervisor Grade-II and to revise the scale of pay
posts. However, the Committee finds justification to place these posts on par with
Warder Grade-II of Prison Department based on the pay parity enjoyed in the pre-
Pay Rs.1800. and that the subsequent revision granted to the Warder Grade-II of
One Man Commission 2010 was not extended to these posts. Hence the Committee
recommends to revise the scale of pay of the posts of Warden Grade-II / Gateman
Department .
revise the scale of pay of these posts from Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.1800 to
nomenclature of the posts and to place the posts in the scale of pay of Rs.5200--
20200 + Grade Pay Rs.2900. However, the Committee finds that it is reasonable to
place these posts on par with Warder Grade—II of Prison Department. Accordingly,
the Committee recommends that the scale of pay of these posts may be revised
Pay Rs.2800 have requested to clarify the eligibility of Special Allowance of Rs.500/-
sanctioned to Secondary Grade Teachers and other teaching posts in the grade of
Secondary Grade in G.O. Ms. No. 270, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 26--8--
234
2010 which has subsequently been revised to Rs.750/- and converted as Personal
Committee has considered the fact that these posts were all along placed on par
Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 12-01-2011 to the teaching categories which
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
235
GENERAL FOREMAN
Association, Tamil Nadu State Health Transport Department Anna Employees Union
and thirteen individuals have requested to retain the pay of the post of General
Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26--2—2011 on par with General Foreman of
Foreman in State Health Transport Department has been granted the revised scale
without any proper justification for such a steep increase in pay scale from Pay
Band—2 to Pay Band—3. It is also noticed that this higher revision of pay has not
been implemented due to the “Interim Stay” granted by the Hon’ble High Court on
Committee has also observed that the qualification prescribed for the post of
General Foreman in State Health Transport Department is only a diploma and which
Due to the above said steep increase and shift in from Pay Band-- 2 to Pay Band—3,
several Service Associations have represented for pay hike to its promotional posts
citing this post. Therefore, the Committee recommends to retain the post of General
Foreman in State Health Transport Department to its original level on par with Junior
Engineers of Public Works Department and place the scale of pay of this post to the
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
Engineer in State Health Transport Department have requested to retain the scale
downgraded to Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.5100 in G.O. Ms. No. 71, Finance (Pay
Cell) Department, dated: 26--02--2011. The Committee has reviewed the above
said orders and elsewhere recommended to place the post of Assistant Engineer in
Public Works Department & other equivalent posts in Pay Band—2 instead of Pay
Band—3 on par with their counterparts in Central Public Works Department with an
place this post on par with their counterparts in Public Works Department at
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
238
SCHOOL EDUCATION
Tamilaga Aasiriyar Kuttani, Tamil Nadu Aasiriyar Kuttani, Tamil Nadu Idainilai
Aasiriyar Iyakkam, Tamil Nadu Aarambapali Aasiriyar Kuttani, Joint Action Council of
Tamil Nadu All Teachers Organisations, Anna Aasiriyar Nala Kuttani, All India
Teachers Peravai, Tamilaga Aasiriyar Mandram, Tamil Nadu Kalai Aasiriyargal Nala
Sangam, Idainilai Pattathari Aasiriyar Sangam, Tamil Nadu All Teachers Association
and various individuals holding the post of Secondary Grade Teacher have
requested to revise the scale of pay of Secondary Grade Teachers from Rs.5200-
Thiru .S. Mari Durai and three other Secondary Grade Teachers have filed W.P.
(MD) No.9218 of 2012 in Madurai Bench of Madras High Court with a request to
direct the respondent to consider their representation dated: 22-4-2012 in the Pay
Man Commission, 2010 to revise the scale of pay of the Secondary Grade Teacher
One Man Commission, taking note of the fact that if the scale of pay of Rs.9300--
School is extended to the Secondary Grade Teachers in this State it will further
239
distort the local pay relativity among other similarly placed categories and also invite
request for granting alternative benefit as allowed in the previous Pay Commission
period. Further, if higher scale of pay is allowed it will lead to huge additional
financial commitment to the State Exchequer. Hence, the requests of the Secondary
Grade Teachers have been rejected by the One Man Commission. However, the
and to all the Teachers in the cadre of Secondary Grade Teachers. Accordingly,
Allowance already sanctioned to the Secondary Grade Teachers with effect from
12—01—2011. Subsequently, it has been clarified that the Personal Pay of Rs.750/-
can be taken into account for fixation of pay on promotion, annual increment,
It is also noticed that this post is, filled by direct recruitment through Employment
Schools of Central Government is Primary School Teachers and this post is also
i) Senior Secondary School Certificate with 50% Mark or Intermediate with 50%
Mark.
ii) Diploma or Certificate in Basic Teachers Training of a duration of not less
than 2 years or Bachelor in Elementary Education (B.Ed.,) or equivalent.
iii) Competence to teach Hindi and English Medium and knowledge of Computer
Application desirable.
240
The Primary School Teachers have been granted the revised scale of pay of
posted throughout the country at national level and in the case of Secondary Grade
Teachers, they are posted within the State and that too at the block level and there is
Though there is such a considerable difference in qualification and work nature, the
Pay of Rs.750/- p.m. in lieu of further scale revision to all the Secondary Grade
Teachers who were drawing the Grade Pay of Rs.2800/-. In the above
Grade Teachers to grant the higher scale of pay of Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4200
Tamil Nadu Graduate Teachers Association, Tamil Nadu High School and
College Teachers Association, Promoted B.T’s and Tamil Teacher’s Kazhagam and
Tamilaga Tamil Asiriyar Sangam have requested to revise the scale of pay of the
Grade scale of pay of Rs.15600-39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 to the Selection Grade B.T’s
Department, dated: 08-11-2010 without any restriction as all the B.T. Assistants
may not have chance of promotion as Headmaster High School. Further, the
personal pay of Rs.750/- from 1-1-2006. It is noticed that this post has been granted
the revised scale of pay as Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4600 as against the pre-
this post, pay scale of this post has been revised from Rs.9300--34800 +
G.P. Rs.4600 to Rs.9300--34800 +. G.P. Rs.4800 i.e. one level above the scale of
pay of Headmaster, Middle School and placed on par with Post Graduate Assistant
so as to maintain the pay relativity among these posts. Further, taking note of the
duties and responsibilities of this post, Government has considered this post as a
Further, the Post Graduate Teachers who are 15879 in number are also placed on
par with Head Master, High School and as such any revision given to Headmaster,
High School may have to be extended to the Post Graduate Teachers. In addition
the next promotional post viz., District Educational Officer has also been placed in
the same pay scale of Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.5400. If any change is made in
respect of Headmaster High School, it will disturb the vertical pay relativity of the
next higher level posts viz., Headmaster Higher Secondary School, District
Educational Officer, Chief Educational Officer and Joint Director which cannot be
resorted to. Hence, the Committee finds that the present scale of pay is appropriate
and there is no justification to revise the scale of pay of Head Master High School
Amaipu, All India Teachers Peravai, Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary School
Tamil Pandits and the Director of School Education, letter dated: 11—8—2011 have
requested to fix the scale of pay of the Tamil Pandit / Physical Director (High School)
34800 + G.P. Rs.4600 on par with B.T. Assistants on the ground of pay parity
enjoyed by these posts in the pre-revised scales of pay which has also been
G.P. Rs.5400.
ii) The Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary Vocational Teachers Association has
consider their representation dated:6-8-2011. The Hon’ble High Court in its order
Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated:12-1-2011 and extension of the benefits to the
iii) The Director, Backward Classes Welfare also has requested to extend
the G.O.Ms.No.23, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 12-01-2011 to the Tutor-
cum Warden / Matron who were placed on par with B.T. Assistant.
The Committee has noticed that the posts of Tamil Pandit / Physical Director
G.P. Rs.4400 as against the pre-revised scale of pay of Rs.5500--9000 on par with
B.T. Assistants. However, the subsequent pay revision made to B.T. Assistant from
G.O.Ms.No.23, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 12-01-2011 has not been
extended to the above posts which were already in the cadre of B.T. Assistants is
merely an omission. Hence, the Committee finds justification in the request of the
Teachers who were placed in the cadre of B.T. Assistant under the control of School
Education, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare and Backward Classes and Most
request for sanction of incentive increments / allowances etc., does not come under
the purview of Pay Grievance Redressal Cell which may be decided by Government
Education.
244
Nadu Physical Education Inspector Association have requested to revise the scale of
pay of the post of Physical Director Grade-II and Physical Director Grade-I as
Association has requested to create the post of Deputy Director (Physical Education)
and Joint Director (Physical Education) by upgrading the existing post of Chief
scale of pay of Physical Director, Grade-II and Physical Director, Grade-I have been
with B.T. Assistant and Post Graduate Assistant. However, the subsequent revision
made to B.T. Assistant and Post Graduate Assistant in the scales of pay Rs.9300--
G.O.Ms.No.23, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 12-01-2011 have not been
extended to the Physical Director, Grade-II and Physical Director Grade-I which is
merely an omission. Hence, the Committee finds justification in the request and
accordingly, recommends that the scale of pay of Physical Director, Grade-II and
upgradation of the posts sought by the Association does not come under the purview
245
of this Committee and the same is left to Government for taking a decision in the
matter.
Education Officer and Thiru Sivakalimuthu and other retired Personal Assistants to
District Education Officers have requested to revise the scale of pay of this post as
Rs.15600-- 39100+ G.P. Rs.5700 (or) 5400 (or) 5100 on par with Assistant Engineer,
Ranger, Tahsildar and other equivalent categories based on the pay parity enjoyed
in the pre-revised scale of pay. It is observed that the Official Committee, 2009 has
placed this post in the revised scale of pay of Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4900 as
pay granted to the posts like Assistant Engineers and others have been downgraded
subsequently in G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26-2-2011
in which pay of posts like Tahsildar, Block Development Officer etc. have been
G.P. Rs.5100 the Committee recommends that the similar revision may also be
And further it has been requested to place the above posts on par with equal
It is observed that the above said posts have been equally placed both in the
pre-revised scales of pay and also in the revised scale of pay as on 1.1.2006.
However, the subsequent revision of pay made to the categories of B.T. Assistant,
G.O.Ms.No.23, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 12—1—2011 have not been
Training as follows:--
Institutes shall be governed by the general and special rules applicable to the
holders of the permanent posts in the Tamil Nadu School Education Subordinate
247
Service and the Lecturers and Senior Lecturers in Directorate of Teacher Education
Research and Training and District Institutes of Education and Training are governed
by the general and special rules applicable to the holders of the permanent posts in
the Tamil Nadu Higher Secondary Educational Service. Therefore, the Committee
finds justification in the request of the Association based on parity of pay and
qualification that existed between the Lecturers of Teacher Training Institute and
Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4800 on par with Headmaster High School and also
sanction Personal pay of Rs.750/- and Special Allowance of Rs.500/- for Ordinary
Grade and Selection Grade / Special Grade Principals respectively on par with High
School Headmasters. The Committee observed that this post has been placed in
the revised scale of pay Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4600 as against the pre-revised
scale of pay of Rs.6500--10500 on par with Headmaster, High School and however,
G.P. Rs.4600 to Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4800 vide G.O.Ms.No. 58, Finance (Pay
Cell) Department, dated: 25-02-2011 has not been extended to this post.
justification to extend the similar revision and accordingly recommends that the scale
Rs.500/- p.m. sanctioned to the Ordinary Grade and Selection Grade / Special
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
250
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
251
BINDER GRADE--II
Government Branch Press Labourers Association have requested to revise the scale
G.P. Rs.2000. It is noticed that this post has been placed on par with other Grade-II
trade posts. Hence, the Committee recommends that the revision of scale of pay
recommended elsewhere for Grade-II trade posts under trade categories may also
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
253
requested to revise the scale of pay for the posts of Amin, Examiner and Copyist
Junior Assistant / Typist on the grounds that these posts were similarly placed in the
pre-revised scale of pay and subsequent revision of pay granted to the posts of
Junior Assistant / Typist was omitted to these posts. It is noticed that these posts
are treated as equivalent posts in Tamil Nadu Judicial Ministerial Service and hence
the scale of pay recommended for the posts of Senior Bailiff, Examiner and Copyist
in Tamil Nadu Judicial Ministerial Service on par with Junior Assistant / Typist in
Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of Amin, Examiner and Copyist in
ASSISTANT
requested to revise the scale of pay of the post of Assistant from Rs.5200—20200 +
G.P. Rs.2400 to Rs.5200 —20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 on par with the post of Ministerial
Assistant as their role in the Commission’s office is a crucial and pivotal one for the
functioning of the Commission. Further, at present the scale of pay of the Junior
been placed equally. Therefore, considering their nature of work, they have
requested to fix their scale of pay at Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. 2800 on par with the
level above Junior Assistants, similar revision may also be extended to this post
considering the pay parity that existed earlier with these posts.
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
255
SURVEYOR-CUM-ASSISTANT DRAUGHTSMAN
Department have requested to revise the scale of pay on par with their counterpart in
G.P. Rs.2400. Consequent on the extension of scale of pay for the post of Surveyor
finds that the comparison made is appropriate. Besides, prior to the issue of the
equally all along with their counterparts in Survey Department. Hence, the
DRAUGHTSMAN GRADE-III
Technical Officers Association has requested to revise the scale of pay for the
Man Commission, 2010, the Committee finds justification to revise the scale of pay
qualification. Hence, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of the
It is observed that the qualification prescribed for this post is a Degree in Civil
Engineering or Architecture. Moreover, this post was placed all along with Assistant
Engineers of Public Works Department prior to the revision made by One Man
Commission, 2010. Hence, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of
Department whose scale of pay has been placed by the Committee in Pay Band—2.
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
258
G.O. Ms. No.324, Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 26—2--2010 on the grounds
that their duties and responsibilities are more compared to other administrative
officers and they have collected huge revenue for the State. It is noticed that the
Official Committee has placed this post in the Pay Band Rs.15600--39100 +
observed that this post has been rightly placed in Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs. 5400
by the Official Committee, 2009 and One Man Commission,2010 has revised the
scale of pay of this post to Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs. 6600 due to elevation of pay
scale of its feeder categories viz., Personal Assistant to Regional Transport Officer/
relativity between the posts. However, the pay scale of this post has been restored
to its original level of Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 in G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance
the view that this post has been rightly placed in the scale of pay of Rs.15600--
the Committee recommends to retain the pay scale of Regional Transport Officer
Transport Officer in their representations have stated that their duties and
noticed that based on the recommendations of Official Committee the scale of pay of
pay of this post was further revised as Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.5400 notionally
with effect from 12—12--2007 with monetary benefit from 1--8--2010 and then again
(Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26--2--2011. Hence, the Associations have requested
individuals in this post continue to draw the higher pay granted by One Man
Commission due to the “Interim Stay” granted on the operation of the GO.Ms.No.71,
Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26--2--2011 the Committee is of the view that
it is not appropriate to place this post in Pay Band--3 as recommended by One Man
Commission, 2010 in which the Group-I posts are placed. Hence the Committee
Association and several individuals in their representations have stated that their
duties and responsibilities are more when compared to other administrative officials.
The One Man Commission has placed the Motor Vehicle Inspector Grade-I at
However, the Committee is of the view that it is not appropriate to place this post in
Pay Band--3 as recommended by the One Man Commission, 2010 in which the
Group-I posts are placed. Hence, the Committee recommends to place this post in
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
261
individuals has requested to revise the scale of pay of these posts as Rs.15600--
39100 + G.P. Rs.5100 on par with Tahsildar / Block Development Officer / Inspector
of Police / Forest Ranger as they were identically placed in the pre-revised and
revised scales of pay. The Committee has observed that this post has been placed
revised scales of pay. Further, the Committee has also elsewhere recommended to
place the Tahsildar, Block Development Officer, etc. in Pay Band—2 instead of Pay
withdraw the pay hike given to the post of Sub-Treasury Officer as Rs.9300—34800 +
G.P. Rs.4900 ordered in G.O. Ms. No.330, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated:
26.8.2010 and issue suitable amendment to this effect as this is a lower post to
Assistant Treasury Officer. Tamil Nadu Treasuries and Accounts Service Association,
Thiru M. V. Palraj, Superintendent and ten others have requested to revise the scale
G.P. Rs.5100 on par with Tahsildar / Block Development Officer etc. The Committee
has observed that the posts of Sub–Treasury Officer / Additional Sub-Treasury Officer
262
Commission, 2010 the scale of pay of the post of Sub – Treasury Officer has been
appropriate to set right this issue by issue of suitable amendment at Government level
by deleting the post of Sub- Treasury Officer included in G.O. Ms. No. 330, Finance
(PC) Department, dated: 26--8--2010 and the excess amount drawn by the
incumbents if any, may also need not be recovered and appropriately re-fix their pay
ACCOUNTANT
individuals have brought to notice of the Committee that the individuals holding the
post of Junior Assistant are getting more pay than the directly recruited Accountant in
promotion from Junior Assistant and the category of Junior Assistant has been
awarded higher start of pay for possessing Degree Qualification which leads to pay
requested to set right this pay anomaly. The Committee is of the view that general
decision taken on this issue may also be made applicable to this post.
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
264
TOURISM
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
265
TECHNICAL EDUCATION
LABORATORY ASSISTANT
Technical Education Training Staff Association and other individuals have requested
to revise the scale of pay of this post on par with Junior Assistants. Thiru
fixation of pay in the post of Special Grade Laboratory Assistant. It is noticed that
the scale of pay of Laboratory Assistant has been revised from Rs.5200--20200 +
26-2-2011. Hence, the Committee finds justification to extend similar revision to this
post. Accordingly, the Committee recommends that the scale of pay of this post may
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
267
TRADE POSTS
Works Department Workshop & Stores Employees Association / Tamil Nadu Police
Panchayat Union Retired Officials Welfare Association / Tamil Nadu Police Transport
Technical Staff Welfare Association / Tamil Nadu Museum Technical Staff Welfare
Technical Staff Associations and several other Associations and individuals have
requested to place the Trade Posts on higher scales of pay than those
posts in different departments orders have been issued in G.O. Ms. No.338, Finance
(Pay Cell) Department, dated 26.8.2010, wherein trade posts with ITI qualification,
supervisory posts with diploma qualification and Semi Skilled and Unskilled posts
268
without ITI qualification were grouped and rationalised into five categories with the
condition that in future, appointments have to be made only with ITI qualification and
with a saving clause to protect the existing incumbents who are getting higher pay
for a post beyond the prescribed scale of pay who are having lesser qualification
than that prescribed for a post. Hence, there is no loss to the existing incumbents
and pay scales of many posts have been elevated to a higher level. However, the
Committee finds justification in the request of Grade-II trade posts (entry level) who
are having SSLC. plus ITI. qualification when compared to the revision of pay
SSLC holders. As such the Committee recommends that the scale of pay of all
Grade-II trade posts (entry level) may be revised from Rs.5200--20200 + G.P.
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
269
TOWN PANCHAYAT
Tamil Nadu Town Panchayat Executive Officers Association and Tamil Nadu
individuals have requested to place the post in the Pay Band--3 at Rs.15600--39100
+ G.P. Rs.5100 + Personal Pay Rs.1000/- on par with Block Development Officer. It
is observed that this post has been placed in the revised pay scale at Rs.9300--
34800 + G.P. Rs.4900 from 12-12-2007 as against the upgraded pre-revised scale
to revise the scale pay of Executive Officer Grade-I (Special Grade Town Panchayat)
G.P. Rs.2400 to Rs.5200 – 20200 + G.P Rs.2800 and to grant Personal Pay of
Rs.500/-. The Committee observed that the post of Executive Officer Grade-II is
filled by promotion from Junior Assistant and was placed all along on par with
Assistants in Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service in the pre-revised scales of pay and in
the revised scale of pay on 1.1.2006. However, the subsequent pay revision made to
270
G.P. Rs.2800 has not been extended to this post. Therefore, the Committee finds
justification to restore the pay parity with Assistants and accordingly recommends
that the scale of pay of Executive Officer, Grade-II be revised from Rs.5200-20200 +
The Committee has observed that the post of Executive Engineer has been
Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.7600 and then downgraded to the original level of pay
scale of Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 in G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell)
Department, dated: 26.02.2011. As the Hon’ble High Court has granted ‘Interim
Stay’ on the implementation of the G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department,
dated 26.02.2011 only to Appellants, the Committee has reviewed the entire
Government Order and concluded that placing the Executive Engineer of Town
appropriate. Accordingly, the Committee endorses to retain the original pay scale of
and as ordered in G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated:
appropriately in Pay Band-2 instead of Pay Band-3 with an enhanced Grade Pay of
271
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
272
INSPECTOR OF POLICE
higher scale of pay Rs.9300-34800 + G.P. Rs.4900 as against the pre-revised scale
this post, Govt. has revised the scale of pay of the post of Inspector of Police from
G.O.Ms.No. 71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26-02-2011. As the Hon’ble
High Court has granted “Interim Stay”, the above scale of pay has not been
revised scale of pay have also represented before the Committee to grant them the
scale of pay in Pay Band--3 at Rs.15600--39100 + Grade Pay Rs.5100. Hence, the
Committee is of the view that the revision granted to Inspector of Police, Tahsildar,
Ranger and Block Development Officer in Pay Band—3, where the Group—I posts
are placed is not appropriate. Hence, the Committee recommends to place this post
with a Special Hardship allowance of Rs.1000/- p.m. for the arduous nature of work
discharged by them.
273
MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION
SUPERINTENDENT
than Chennai and Coimbatore) as Rs. 9300 – 34800 + G.P. Rs.4800. It is noticed
34800 + G.P. Rs.4800 as against the upgraded pre-revised scale of pay of Rs.7000-
Departments in the light of G.O.Ms. No.234, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated:
01-06-2009. The Hon’ble High Court in its order dated: 31-03-2011 in W.P.No. 8259 of
2011 has directed to pass orders on his representation within a period of four
months. As the G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26--02--2011
was contested in the High Court, the petitioners were informed that the request has
been placed before the Pay Grievance Redressal Cell for examination and
recommendations. Now the Association has requested to revise the scale of pay of
uniform scale of pay. Accordingly, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of
pay of Superintendents in all Corporations (Other than Chennai and Coimbatore) from
Tamil Nadu Local Bodies Urban Health Nurses Association has requested
G.P. Rs.2400. The Urban Health Nurse (Erstwhile Auxiliary Nurse Midwife / Multi
purpose Health Worker (Female) / Maternity Assistant) has been granted the revised
Man Commission, the scale of pay of the post of Village Health Nurse under Public
Health and Preventive Medicine Department has been revised from Rs.5200--
G.O. Ms. No.34, Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department, dated:
Department, dated: 06-01-2010, that the posts of Auxiliary Nurse Midwife / Multi
Village Health Nurse in Public Health and Preventive Medicine Department. Likewise
the Multi Purpose Health Worker (Female) / Auxiliary Nurse Midwife / Maternity
Health Nurse. Further, the qualification, Training and Job factors prescribed for the
post of Urban Health Nurse (Erstwhile Auxiliary Nurse Midwife/ Multi Purpose Health
Worker (Female) / Maternity Assistant is the same as that of Village Health Nurse.
It is also brought to the notice of the Committee that Tmt. L.Vijayalakshmi and 4
275
others have filed W.P.No.8099 / 2011 to pass suitable orders to grant revision of
scale of pay of Urban Health Nurse on par with Village Health Nurse at Rs.5200 –
20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 based on her representation dated: 30-03-2012. The Hon’ble
High Court in its order dated: 19-04-2011 in W.P.No.8099 / 2011 has directed the
respondents to pass orders within a period of four months. The Government has
remitted the matter to this Committee for examination and making necessary
Village Health Nurse to the Urban Health Nurse working in Corporations and
in qualification, training and job factors finds justification to revise the scale of pay
for the post of Urban Health Nurse ((Erstwhile Auxiliary Nurse Midwife/ Multi Purpose
Health Worker (Female) / Maternity Assistant) on par with Village Health Nurse in
recommends to revise the scale of pay of the above posts in Municipalities and
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
Tamil Nadu Municipal Town Planning Officers Association and Tamil Nadu
G.P. Rs.4400. This post is presently placed in the revised scale of pay of Rs.5200-
Considering the diploma qualification prescribed for this post, the Committee finds
justification to place this post as a supervisory post in the light of the orders issued in
Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of Town Planning Inspector from
Employees Association has requested to revise the scale of pay of these posts as
Rs.5200 – 20200 + G.P. Rs.2600. As these posts comes under the category of
Trade Posts and designated as Skilled Assistant Grade-II (entry level posts), the
277
the Committee to the entry level Grade—II Trade posts may also be extended to
Rs.5200–20200+ G.P. Rs. 2600 as these posts are presently placed in the scale of
recommended to revise the scale of pay of all the Grade-I Trade posts which were in
Committee finds justification to extend the above revised scale of pay of Rs. 5200—
20200 + G.P. Rs.2600 to all the Grade--I Trade posts which were in the pre-revised
Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of the above Grade--I posts in
20200 + G.P. Rs. 2600 on par with Skilled Assistant Grade--I in Corporations and
Municipalities.
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
279
MUNICIPALITES
CLASS--I MANAGER
G.P. Rs.5100 on par with Tahsildar / Block Development Officer. The Committee has
observed that this post has been filled by transfer from the Selection Grade
the directions of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, the Official Committee, 2009
scale of pay of Rs.7000—11500 and its promotional posts were placed in the revised
higher scale of pay enjoyed by this category in the pre-revised scale of pay, the
Committee finds justification to place the category of Class—I Manager on par with
Tamil Nadu Municipal Ministerial Staff Association has requested revise the
scale of pay of the above posts of Class—I A Manager and Revenue Officer as
Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4900. It is noticed that these posts are placed in the
280
scale of pay the posts of Class-IA Manager and Revenue Officer also on par with
the Superintendents in the Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service. Considering the higher
scale of pay enjoyed by these categories in the pre-revised scale of pay, the
G.P. Rs.4800.
SIDDHA PHARMACIST
Tamil Nadu Sanitary Supervisors Association and the Tamil Nadu
the scale of pay of the post of Pharmacist from Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2800 to
the Committee finds justification to extend the above revision of scale of pay to the
Nadu Local Bodies Urban Health Nurses Association have requested revision of the
scale of pay of this post as Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4700 on par with their
34800 + G.P. Rs.4700 and similar revision has been omitted to be extended to the
finds justification to extend the above scale of pay to the Nursing Superintendent
Nadu Local Bodies Urban Health Nurses Association have requested to revise the
scale of pay of the posts of Nursing Superintendent Grade—III and Nursing Tutor
earlier. The posts of Nursing Superintendent Grade-III and Nursing Tutor, Grade-II
G.O. Ms. No. 395, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 4-10-2010, the scale of
G.P. Rs.4700 respectively. Hence, the Committee finds justification to revise the
scale of pay of the posts of Nursing Superintendent Grade-III (merged with Nursing
HELPER (WIREMAN)
Light Employees Association has requested to revise the scale of pay of Wireman as
Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2600. This post comes under Trade Post category and
all the entry level Grade--II Trade Posts have been placed in the revised scale of pay
Considering the requests of the posts of Trade Category, the Committee elsewhere
Skilled Assistant Grade—II and the same revision of pay may be extended to this
post also.
BOREWELL CLEANER
Certain individuals have requested to revise the scale of pay of the above
Man Commission the scale of pay of the above posts in Medical Education and
Medical Services Department, have been revised from Rs.5200--20200+ G.P. Rs.1900
Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of the posts of ECG / EEG
TAP INSPECTOR
Employees Association, Tamil Nadu All Corporation Municipalities Engineer and Tap
Inspector’s Association and Tamil Nadu Third Grade Municipalities and Town
34800 + G.P. Rs.4200. The Committee recommends that the scale of pay of this
G.P. Rs.2000 in the light of the orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.338, Finance (Pay Cell)
WORK INSPECTOR
this post is presently placed at Rs.4800-10000+ G.P. Rs.1650. The Committee finds
justification to place this post on par with unskilled trade posts. The Committee
accordingly, recommends that the scale of pay of this post may be revised from
Un-Skilled Trade posts in the light of the orders issued in G.O.Ms.No.338, Finance
Employees Association has requested to revise the scale of pay of the posts of
G.P. Rs.4200 and to re-designate these posts as Supervisor. The Committee has
observed that based on the recommendations of Official Committee, 2009 the scale
the scale of pay of the post of Overseer in Public Works Department has also been
fixed at Rs.5200—20200 + G.P. Rs.2800. The One Man Commission, 2010 has
recommended to classify the Trade posts into five groups and place the post of
Overseer as a supervisory post and recommended for the revised scale of pay of
Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26—08--2010. Considering these facts, the
Committee finds justification to place the posts of Water Works Overseer and Public
285
Rs.9300--34800+G.P. Rs.4200.
DRAUGHTSMAN
observed that this post was initially placed on par with Junior Draughting Officers in
G.P. Rs.4200.
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
287
CORPORATION OF CHENNAI
ASSISTANT PROGRAMMER
Assistant Programmer as Rs.15600 – 39100 + G.P. Rs.5400. The Tamil Nadu All
Employees Association have also requested revision of scale of pay of this post as
G.P. Rs.4800. The Committee observed that the One Man Commission, 2010 has
recommended higher scale of pay to the categories which comes under Information
Technology wing by classifying the posts into five groups and accordingly orders
were issued in G.O.Ms. No.339, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated: 26-08-2010.
As per this order the post of Assistant Programmer may be granted the revised scale
revise the scale of pay of this post from Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4300 to
STAFF NURSE
G.P. Rs.4450 plus Nursing Allowance of Rs.500/-pm . The Committee observed that
others, the scale of pay of Staff Nurse has been revised from Rs.9300—34800 +
justification to extend similar revision of pay to the Staff Nurse in Corporation and
288
Municipalities also. Accordingly, the Committee recommends that the scale of pay of
G.P. Rs.4200 to Rs.9300--34800 + G.P. Rs.4450. However, the request for nursing
TAX COLLECTOR
the scale of pay of this post as Rs.9300—34800 + G.P. Rs.4800. Likewise the
Chennai Corporation Tax Collector’s Association have also requested revision of the
20200+ G.P. Rs.2400. The Committee observed that this post was originally placed
on par with Junior Assistants. Hence, the Committee finds justification in the request
and accordingly recommends to revise the scale of pay of Tax Collectors in Chennai
G.P. Rs.2400.
NON-MEDICAL DEMONSTRATOR /
LABORATORY SUPERVISOR (GRADUATE TECHNICIAN)
employees have also requested revision of the scale of pay of these posts as
Government has been revised from Rs. 5200--20200+ G.P. Rs.2400 to Rs.9300--
34800+ G.P. Rs.4200 considering the qualification of Higher Secondary Course with
two years diploma in Medical Laboratory Technology and the promotional post viz.
34800 + G.P. Rs.4400. The Committee finds justification to extend similar revision of
STATISTICAL ASSISTANT
revise the scale of pay of this post on par with similar post in Family Welfare
Health and Preventive Medicine and Family Welfare Departments have been revised
the Committee finds justification to revise the scale of pay of Statistical Assistants in
Department. Accordingly the Committee recommends that the scale of pay of this
G.P. Rs.4400.
Water Supply Employees Association and Anna Water, Drainage, Street Light
Employees Association have requested to revise the scale of pay of Skilled Assistant
or G.P. Rs. 2800. The Committee has elsewhere recommended to revise the scale
of pay of Grade-II Trade posts (entry level) from Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2000 to
20200+ G.P.Rs.2800. It is noticed that the scale of pay of Play Ground Instructor in
the pre-revised scale of pay of Rs.4000--6000. It is observed that this post has been
filled by direct recruitment and the qualification prescribed for this post is SSLC with
Physical Educational Training. The nature of work and qualification are similar with
the Committee finds justification to revise the scale of pay of this post as Rs.5200—
20200 + G.P Rs.2800 on par with Physical Education Teacher. The Committee
G.P. Rs.2800.
Corporation has requested to revise his pay as Rs.5200--20200+ G.P. Rs.2800 with
Education Teacher / Play Ground Instructor as these posts are interchangeable one.
that the qualification and method of recruitment of the posts of Physical Education
Teacher, Play Ground Instructor and Swimming Pool Instructor are similar and
interchangeable one. However, the post of Swimming Pool Instructor have not been
granted equal pay in the pre-revised scale of pay and therefore recommended to
revise the scale of pay of this post on par with Physical Education Teacher / Play
recruitment of the posts of Physical Education Teacher, Play Ground Instructor and
Swimming Pool Instructor, the Committee finds justification to place the post of
G.P. Rs.2800 on par with Physical Education Teacher and Play Ground Instructor in
292
The Committee has observed that the post of Executive Engineer has been
Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.7600 and then downgraded to the original level of pay
scale of Rs.15600—39100 + G.P. Rs.6600 in G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell)
Department, dated: 26.02.2011. As the Hon’ble High Court has granted ‘Interim
Stay’ on the implementation of the G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department,
dated: 26.02.2011 only to the Appellants, the Committee has reviewed the entire
Government Order and concluded that placing the Executive Engineer / Divisional
by the Official Committee, 2009 and as ordered in G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay
appropriately in the Pay Band--2 instead of Pay Band--3 with an enhanced Grade
Works Department.
It is observed that the above posts have been placed in the revised scale of
the Hon’ble High Court has granted ‘Interim Stay’ on the implementation of the
G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 26—02--2011 only to the
Appellants, the Committee has reviewed the entire Government Order. The
below the Group-I posts and their counterparts in Government of India. Accordingly,
the Committee recommends to retain the scale of pay these posts as Rs.15600--
VETERINARY OFFICER
It is observed that this post has been placed in the revised scale of pay at
original level of Rs.15600--39100 + G.P. Rs.5400. As the Hon’ble High Court has
granted ‘Interim Stay’ on the implementation of the G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay
Cell) Department, dated 26-02-2011 only to the Appellants, the Committee has
reviewed the entire Government Order and concluded that placing Veterinary Officer
justifiable to place this post one level above the feeder category post at Rs.15600--
Official Committee and as rightly ordered in G.O. Ms. No.71, Finance (Pay Cell)
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
296
CORPORATION OF COIMBATORE
Tamil Nadu State All Corporation Employees Association and some other
individuals holding the above said posts have requested to revise scale of pay for the
Committee. It is noticed that as per the provision in the service rules these posts are
Corporation. Hence the Committee finds justification to place these posts one level
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
placed on par with Assistant Engineer in Public Works Department in the above
PHARMACIST
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
298
JUNIOR ASSISTANT
were all along placed on par with their counterparts in Government departments. It
is noticed that the Junior Assistants in the Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service and
Subsequently, the Government has revised the scale of pay of Junior Assistants as
Rs.5200--20200 + G.P. Rs.2400 and the same has not been extended to Junior
revised scales of pay, the Committee recommends that the above revision of pay
Nadu Local Bodies Urban Health Nurses Association and Coimbatore Corporation
It is noticed that based on the recommendations of One Man Commission 2010, the
Education and Directorate of Medical Rural Health Service have been revised from
requested to revise the scale of pay of the above posts from Rs.5200--20200 +
been omitted to the said posts under Municipalities and Corporations. Hence, the
Tamil Nadu Local Bodies Urban Health Nurses Association has requested
scale of pay of the post of Village Health Nurse under Public Health and Preventive
and Water Supply Department, dated: 03--03--2009 and G.O.(2D) No.1, Municipal
Auxiliary Nurse Midwife / Multi Purpose Health Worker (Female) / Maternity Assistant
have been re-designated as Village Nurse in Public Health and Preventive Medicine
Department. Likewise the Multi Purpose Health Worker (Female) / Auxiliary Nurse
designated as Urban Health Nurse. It is observed that the qualification, training and
Job factors prescribed for the post of Urban Health Nurse (Erstwhile Auxiliary Nurse
Midwife/ Multi Purpose Health Worker (Female) / Maternity Assistant) is the same as
that of Village Health Nurse. As this is only an omission in the One Man
scale of pay for the post of Urban Health Nurse (Erstwhile Auxiliary Nurse Midwife/
Multi Purpose Health Worker (Female) / Maternity Assistant) on par with Village
Health Nurse in Public Health and Preventive Medicine Department from Rs.5200--
However, the above revision has been omitted to be extended to similar post in
301
JUNIOR ANALYST
This post is presently placed in the revised scale of pay of Rs. 9300-34800 +
recommendations, the scale of pay of Junior Analyst in Public Health and Preventive
G.P. Rs.4600.
DRAUGHTSMAN
pre-revised scale of pay of Rs.4500--7000. It is observed that, this post was placed
G.P.Rs.4200 by the One Man Commission, 2010 has been omitted to be extended
to this post. Hence, the Committee recommends to revise the scale of pay of
302
G.P. Rs.4200.
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
303
There have been requests for the revision of Pay Band / Grade Pay of the
The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell after examining in detail the various issues
relating to the requests for the revision and after duly considering the educational
the above said posts and also after taking note of the relevant internal and external
pay relativities recommends that a further revision of scales of pay is not warranted.
employee who enters a post retires from the same post without any further
promotion / elevation which causes the acute stagnation in a post. Further, the two
qualification and a pay scale. It does not address the issue of isolated posts and
Information and Technology posts and linking to the need of Government are
304
beyond the scope of this Committee, given the increasingly important role that
i) All ministerial and officers level staff should have a working knowledge of
using computers for office work and if they do not already have much
knowledge they should be given training.
ii) Routine tasks like data entry on an on going basis should be handled by
regular ministerial staff. Hence, separate categories like Data Entry
Operators, Console Operators, Punch Operators etc. should be treated as
vanishing categories unless there are exceptional circumstances that require
the continuance of such posts in some departments.
iii) Large scale data entry operations, including of legacy data should be
outsourced.
To handle higher level Information Technology related functions both on the software
and hardware side a separate dedicated cadre of technical staff should be created
under the Information Technology department with a hierarchy rising from the
into this cadre. Such a structure would ensure that the issue of stagnation can be
addressed and best Information Technology practices can be disseminated from one
UNIVERSITIES
1. Anna University.
2. Tamil Nadu Agricultural University.
3. Madras Universities and various other Colleges and Polytechniques.
University Grants Commission / All India Council for Technical Education scales of
pay, their request does not come under the ambit of Pay Grievance Redressal Cell.
control, the revision if any, made in the scales of pay of the corresponding posts in
Universities subject to specific orders of the Government and the approval of the
PENSION
Association, Retired Office Assistants and Basic Servants Association, Tamil Nadu
Assistant and Assistant Association (2003), Tamil Nadu Retired All Grade Teachers
Oozhiyar Sangam, Retired Teachers and Officials Munnetra Sangam, Tamil Nadu
several individual petitioners, Writ Petitioners and Chief Minister’s Special Cell
issues:
The Committee observes that pension related issues have not been included
in the Terms of Reference of the Committee. Hence, the Committee has not made
COST OF RECOMMENDATIONS
were examined by the Committee taking into account the Central Parity, prevailing
local anomaly and inadequacy in the existing revised pay scales for some of the
categories of posts and also certain omissions in One Man Commission, 2010
would be around Rs. 206.65 crores per annum, of which the commitment on
and Special Allowance for Tahsildar, Block Development Officer, Forest Ranger and
Inspector of Police alone would be around Rs. 16.14 crores. Around two lakh
Rupees in crores
(Per annum)
granted to the Government employees and the recurring expenditure on the sanction
the revised scales of pay etc., recommended by this Committee may be given
benefit. In cases where the Committee has recommended for revision of scale of
other Categories.
311
JOINT SECRETARY
THIRU R. MAHADEVAN
UNDER SECRETARY
THIRU D. SRIDHAR
SECTION OFFICERS
THIRU T. VIVEK
THIRU P. PANDIARAJAN
ASSISTANT
THIRU P. PALANI
SENIOR TYPIST
THIRU E. RAJESH
TYPIST
TMT. D. ARUNADEVI
RECORD CLERK
ANNEXURE–I
ABSTRACT
Revision of scales of pay – Revival and Appointment of Chairman and Members to
the Pay Grievance Redressal Cell – Implementation of the orders of the Hon’ble
High Court dated: 08—3—2012 in W.P.No.7006 of 2011 and batch cases – Orders –
Issued.
FINANCE (Pay Cell) DEPARTMENT
G.O.Ms.No.123 Dated: 10—04—2012.
Panguni, 28,
Thiruvalluvar Aandu,
2043.
Read:
1. G.O.Ms.No. 71, Finance (PC) Department, dated: 26--2--2011.
2. Judgement of the Hon’ble High Court dated: 18—3--2011 in W.P.No.
7006 of 2011.
3. Government Letter No.19111 / Pay Cell / 2011—4, Finance Department,
dated: 07—3—2012.
4. Judgement of the Hon’ble High Court dated: 08—3--2012 in W.P.No.
7006 of 2011 and batch cases.
5. From the Special Government Pleader, High Court, Madras, 104, Letter
dated: 16—3—2012.
6. From the Hon’ble High Court Division Bench order dated: 27—3—2012
in W.A.Nos. 504, 505, 514, 515 and 516 of 2012.
-----
ORDER:
In the Government Order first read above, orders were issued downgrading /
revising the scales of pay of some of the categories of employees in certain
departments consequent to the rectification of anomalies pointed out in the
recommendations of the One Man Commission. In the said orders, Government has
also constituted a Pay Grievance Redressal Cell under the Chairmanship of Thiru
R.Thyagarajan, I.A.S., the then Special Secretary to Government, Finance
Department to examine the grievances, if any received from the employees hose
scales of pay have not been revised / downgraded and submit its report to
Government within a period of three months and based on the recommendations
made therein the Government shall examine and issue suitable orders.
… /2/
321
--: 2 –
3) The Hon’ble High Court in its order dated: 08—3—2012 in a batch of Writ
Petitions Nos. 7006 of 2011 etc. has made a detailed review of the cases and
dismissed the Writ Petitions with a direction to the Government to constitute the Pay
Grievance Redressal Cell within a period of four weeks by appointing a suitable
officer as Chairman and thereafter the said Committee will proceed to hear the
grievance of all persons including the petitioners. Subsequently, based on the Writ
Appeal filed by the petitioners in W.A.Nos. 504, 505, 514, 515 and 516 of 2012, the
Hon’ble Division Bench of the Madras High Court in its order dated: 27—3—2012
has granted “Interim Stay” on the operation of G.O.Ms.No.71, Finance (PC)
Department, dated: 26—2—2011 and the orders of the learned single Judge except
the operative portion of the order in para—32 viz. constitution of Pay Grievance
Redressal Cell.
2) Thiru M. Padmanabhan,
Additional Secretary to Government ............... Member
(i) The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell shall examine all the
representations so far received and also further representations if any,
from the Employees Associations / Head of Departments / Individual
employees including the aggrieved petitioners relating to anomalies in
the revised pay structure of the respective posts;
(iii) The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell shall submit its report to
Government within a period of three months.
… /3/
322
--: 3 :-
6) The Deputy Secretary to Government dealing with Pay Cell subject shall
assist the Chairman / Members of the Pay Grievance Redressal Cell. As regards
supporting staff to the Pay Grievance Redressal Cell, orders will be issued
separately.
K.SHANMUGAM,
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT.
To
--: 4 :-
Copy to:
Thiru S.Krishnan, I.A.S., Secretary (Expenditure), Finance Department, Chennai – 9.
Thiru M. Padmanabhan, Additional Secretary to Government,
Finance Department, Chennai – 9.
Thiru P. Umanath, I.A.S., Joint Secretary to Government,
Finance Department, Chennai – 9.
The Secretary to Hon’ble Chief Minister, Chennai – 9.
The Special Personal Assistant to Hon’ble Minister(Finance), Chennai – 9.
The Private Secretary to Chief Secretary to Government, Chennai – 9.
The Private Secretary to Principal Secretary to Government,
Finance Department, Chennai – 9.
Finance (OP.I / OP.II/Bills) Department, Chennai – 9.
Stock file / Spare Copy.
// Forwarded // By Order//
SECTION OFFICER.
324
Abstract
Pay Grievance Redressal Cell – Extension of the tenure of Pay Grievance Redressal
Cell and Appointment of a Member – Orders – Issued.
FINANCE (PAY GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL CELL) DEPARTMENT
Read:
ORDER:
In the Government Order read above, orders have been issued re-constituting
the Pay Grievance Redressal Cell to examine all the representations received from
the Employees Associations / Heads of Department / Individual Employees including
the aggrieved petitioners relating to anomalies in the revised pay structure of the
respective posts and make specific recommendations to Government and submit its
report to Government within a period of three months.
2. The Pay Grievance Redressal Cell has conducted personal hearing with
the Recognised / Un-recognised Service Associations / Individuals and Writ
Petitioners from 9-7-2012 to 11-7-2012 and the above Associations including several
individual employees have submitted their detailed Memoranda/Representations to
the Pay Grievance Redressal Cell seeking redressal of their grievances/pay
anomalies. As the tenure of the Pay Grievance Redressal Cell expires on 9-7-2012
and as it will take ample time to examine the representations and finalise the report,
it is considered imperative to extend the tenure of the Pay Grievance Redressal Cell
for a further period of three months beyond 9-7-2012.
K. SHANMUGAM,
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT.
To
Copy to:
SECTION OFFICER.
327
ANNEXURE – IV
Scale of Pay
Sl. Corresponding Scale of pay as Scale of pay
Name of the Post / Pre-Revised granted based on
No. revised scale per G.O.Ms.No. 71, recommended by
Department Scale of Pay OMC / Subsequent
of pay + G.P. dated: 26-02-2011 PGRC
G.O.’s
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs.
I
AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT
1. Agriculture Officer /
9300--34800 + 15600--39100 + 15600--39100 + 9300--34800 +
Horticulture Officer 6500--11100
4700 5400 5100 5100
2. Assistant Director of
15600—39100 15600—39100 + 15600—39100 + 15600—39100
Agriculture / Asst. Director of 8000—13500
+ 5400 6600 5400 +5400
Horticulture
3. Deputy Director / Deputy
15600—39100 15600—39100 + 15600—39100 + 15600—39100 +
Director of Horticulture 10000—15200
+ 6600 7600 6600 6600
4. Joint Director of Agriculture /
15600—39100 37400—67000 + 15600—39100 + 15600—39100 +
Joint Director of Horticulture 12000—16500
+ 7600 8700 7600 7600
II AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Scale of Pay
Sl. Corresponding Scale of pay as Scale of pay
Name of the Post / Pre-Revised granted based on
No. revised scale per G.O.Ms.No. 71, recommended by
Department Scale of Pay OMC / Subsequent
of pay + G.P. dated: 26-02-2011 PGRC
G.O.’s
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs.
VI RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
20 Assistant Engineer
9300—34800 + 15600—39100 + 15600—39100 + 9300—34800 +
6500—11100
4700 5400 5100 5100
21. Assistant Executive Engineer
15600—39100 15600—39100 + 15600—39100 + 15600—39100 +
8000—13500
+ 5400 6600 5400 5400
22. Executive Engineer
15600—39100 15600—39100 + 15600—39100 + 15600—39100 +
10000—15200
+ 6600 7600 6600 6600
23. Block Development Officer 9300—34800 +
9300—34800 + 9300—34800 + 15600—39100 + 5100
7500—12000
4900 4900 5100 + Rs.1000/-p.m.
As Special Allowance
VII INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT
24.
Assistant Engineer
(Industries) / (Tester) / 9300—34800 + 15600—39100 + 15600—39100 + 9300—34800 +
6500—11100
Testing Assistant / Technical 4700 5400 5100 5100
Assistant / Inspector (Quality
control)
VIII INSPECTOR OF FACTORIES DEPARTMENT