UP Academic League of Chemical Engineering Students (UP ALCHEMES)
UP Academic League of Chemical Engineering Students (UP ALCHEMES)
UP Academic League of Chemical Engineering Students (UP ALCHEMES)
x2
102.39 x H3 O 0.02525 M pH=-log 0.02525 M 1.60
0.182 x
0.40 M 50 mL 1.00 M 2 mL
e. Molarity of arsenic acid is 0.1786 M . Molarity of excess acid is 0.01786 M .
50 mL 62 mL 50 mL 62 mL
x 0.01786 x
102.39 x 0.01815 M pH=-log 0.01786 M 0.01815 M 1.44
0.1786 x
1L 1 mol SAH 216.89 g
f. 20 mL 1.00 M 5.000 g 100% 86.76%
1000 mL 1 mol H+ 1 mol SAH
g. 1st endpoint – thymolphthalein, 2nd endpoint – bromocresol green, 3rd endpoint – thymol blue
2.
a. Note the equation for osmotic pressure: Mtot RT . Using an ICE table we can find a formula for Mtot:
9.283 10 y
4
9.283 10 4
A2-
H3O+ HA- H2O
I 20.00
31.26 0 ---
C -20.00
-20.00 +20.00 ---
Final 0
11.26 20.00 ---
205.12 g 1 mL
20.00 mmol 4.1024 g Na 2 A , 31.26 mmol 20.84 mL HCl
1000 mol 1.50 mmol
When the number of moles of Ag reaches the number of moles of I stoichiometrically (its “equivalence point”), the equilibrium
concentration of iodide becomes Ksp 9.22 109 . Since the concentration of iodide is still small to induce precipitation of
PbI2, the second cation will precipitate after a certain volume of NaI from the “equivalence point”.
0.025M 50 mL
Thus mL of NaI to reach equivalence point 12.5 mL . Let x be the additional volume of NaI to be added.
0.1 M
After the equivalence point of AgI precipitation some concentration of I - will be produced due to equilibrium, but the Ksp of AgI
is so small that the additional concentration of I- is considered to be negligible. Thus, the solution can be simplified by only
considering the Ksp of PbI2.
1.800 10 13 M
% ppt'n 100% 7.20 10 10 % 0.1% , thus precipitation is complete.
0.025 M
c. Since the precipitating agent is different, it does not mean Pb2+ will be the second cation to precipitate.
2 mmol
Pb2 0.03185 M , Tl 0.025 M 50 mL 0.0199 M
new 62.80 mL new 62.80 mL
K sp 1.6 10 5 K sp 1.7 10 4
For PbCl2: Cl 0.0224 M , for TlCl: Cl 8.54 10 3 M
Pb
2
0.03185 Tl
0.0199
Thus, Tl+ will be the second cation to precipitate. At the equivalence point, Cl 1.7 104 0.01303 M , which is not
enough to enduce precipitation of PbCl2. Thus, PbCl2 will precipitate after a certain volume of NaI from the “equivalence point”.
Since the Ksp of TlCl is slightly large, we must take into account the additional concentration of Cl - produced from TlCl after the
equivalence point. Let y be the additional concentration of Cl- from TlCl.
0.025M 50 mL
Moles of Tl: 0.025 M 50 mL 1.25 mmol , volume of NaCl to reach equivalence point is 2.5 mL .
0.1 M
TlCl Tl+ Cl-
Initial moles --- 1.25 0.5 M × (x + 2.5) mL
Change in moles --- -1.25 -1.25
0.5 M x mL
Final Molarity --- 0
62.80 mL + x mL 2.5 mL
C --- +y +y
0.5 M x mL
E --- y y
62.80 mL + x mL 2.5 mL
0.5 M x mL
Tl Cl 1.7 104 y
y 1.7 10 4
x mL 62.80 mL 2.5 mL
2
2 2 mmol 0.5 M x mL
Pb2 Cl 1.6 105 y 1.6 10 5
x mL 62.80 mL 2.5 mL x mL 62.80 mL 2.5 mL
0.5 M x mL 2 mmol
Let y m, n:
x mL 62.80 mL 2.5 mL x mL 62.80 mL 2.5 mL
1.7 10
2
ym 4
2
y2 2 mmol
1.81 103 y 1.81 10 3 n 0.0425
nm 2 1.6 105 n x mL 62.80 mL 2.5 mL
2
2 mmol 0.5 M x mL 2 mmol 5
0.0425 1.6 10
x mL 62.80 mL 2.5 mL x mL 62.80 mL 2.5 mL x mL 62.80 mL 2.5 mL
x 2.146 mL
Thus the volume of NaCl to be added just before the third cation precipitates is 2.146 mL 2.5 mL 4.65 mL
d. Based from the ICE table of TlCl, the amount of Tl+ remaining is also equal to y.
2 mmol
y Tl 0.0425 7.319 10 3
x mL 62.80 mL 2.5 mL
7.319 10 3
% ppt'n 100% 29.28% 0.1% , thus precipitation is not complete.
0.025 M
e. Precipitation will be complete if the final concentration of cation is less than 0.1%.
2 mmol
Pb2before
0.0297 M Pbfinal 0.0297 M 0.1%=2.97 10 5 M
2
67.44 mL
Let x be the mL of Na2SO4 needed.
Since the number of moles of Fe3+ is equal to the moles of EDTA4- and the Kf value is large, we can assume that the remaining
EDTA4- in equilibrium is negligible.
0.02 M 50 mL 3.0 M 15 mL
Fe(EDTA) 0.0114 M, NH3 0.514 M
67.44 4.07 1.00 15 mL 67.44 4.07 1.00 15 mL
Fe EDTA Fe3 EDTA 4
Fe3 3OH Fe OH 3(s)
3NH3 3H2 O 3OH 3NH4
Fe EDTA 3NH3 3H2 O Fe OH 3(s) 3NH4 EDTA 4
K eq 0.0788 x 0.01137 M
0.0114 x 0.514 3x
3
K f K sp
0.0114 0.01137 M
%ppt'n= 100% 0.45% 0.1% . Thus, precipitation is not complete.
0.0114 M
4.
a.
Reaction ∆H°, kJ/mol ∆S°, J/(mol K)
CO( g ) H2 O( g ) CO2( g ) H2( g ) -41 -74.1
CH4( g ) H2 O( g ) CO( g ) 3H2( g ) (-206)×-1 (-230.7) ×-1
2CO2( g ) 6H2( g ) 2CH3 OH( g ) 2H2 O( g ) (-49.1)×2 (-161.2) ×2
2CH3 OH( g ) CH3 OCH3( g ) H2 O( g ) (37)×-1 (23.8)×-1
CH4( g ) CO2( g ) 2H2( g ) CH3 OCH3( g ) H2 O( g ) 29.8 -189.6
kJ 1000 J 189.6 J J
Go Ho TSo 29.8 298.15 K 8.633 104
mol 1 kJ mol K mol
J
8.633 104
Go RT ln K p mol ln K p K p 7.50 10 16
J
8.314 298.15 K
mol K
2
K c 4.49×10-13
J
29800
K p2 Ho 1 1 K p, 3500 K mol 1 1 11
b. ln ln 16
K p, 3500 K 4.48 10
K p1 R T2 T1 7.50 10 J 3500 K 298.15 K
8.314
mol K
2
L atm
K c K p (RT)2 4.48 10 11 3500 K 0.08206 3.69 10
6
mol K
CH4 CO2 H2 8.00 M 0.33 2.64 M, 4 H2 O H2 O 8.00 M 0.01
H2 O 0.016 M, CH3 OCH3 4 0.016 M=0.064 M
H2 O CH3 OCH3 0.064 0.016
Q 2.108 10 5 K c , therefore reaction will shift to reverse.
CH4 CO2 H2 2.64 2.64 2.64
2 2
0.064 x 0.016 x
3.695 10 6 x 0.01242 M
2.64 x 2.64 x 2.64 2x
2
Q
3.784 10 2.626 10 1.788 10
3 4
8
K c , thus the reaction will shift forward.
2.482 1.528 3.827
2
3.784 10 3
x 2.626 10 4 x
3.69 10 6 x 0.01223 M
2.482 x 1.528 x 3.827 2x
2
5.
a. [Fe(CN)6]3- - red-orange, [Ni(CN)4]2- - yellow
0.01 M 10.00 mL M mL cation
b. Mstd 0.001 M Msample std , Vtotal 20 mL
100 mL Vtotal
0.001 M 1.00 mL 0.001 M 4.00 mL
M1 5 105 M . M3 2 104 M .
20 mL 20 mL
0.001 M 2.00 mL 0.001 M 8.00 mL
M2 1 104 M M4 4 104 M
20 mL 20 mL
3
Reaction: Fe(3aq ) 6CN(aq ) Fe CN 6
( aq )
complexeq
Kf
M M
6
CN 6 complex eq Fe complex eq
3.333 10 4 M
Solution 1: K f 9.088 1041
2 10 M 2 10 M
3 4 6 3 4
M 6 3.333 10 M 3.333 10
4.9999 10 4 M
Solution 2: K f 1.038 1042
3 10 M 3 10 M
3 4 6 3 4
M 6 4.9999 10 M 4.9999 10
6.2499 10 4 M
Solution 3: K f 1.149 1042
3.75 10 M 3.75 10 M
3 4 6 3 4
M 6 6.2499 10 M 6.2499 10
9.088 1041 1.038 1042 1.149 10 42
Average 1.032 ×1042
3
0.01 M 10 mL 0.001 M mL Ni
For [Ni(CN)4]2-: M diluted CN 0.001 M, M Ni , Vtotal 20.00 mL
100 mL Vtotal
0.001 M mL CN-
MCN , Vtotal 20.00 mL
Vtotal
0.001 M 4.00 mL
Solution 1: MCN M Ni 2 104 M
20.00 mL
0.001 M 6.00 mL
Solution 2: MCN M Ni 3 104 M
20.00 mL
0.001 M 7.50 mL
Solution 3: MCN M Ni 3.75 10 4 M
20.00 mL
Absorbance y int
complexeq
slope
1.78083 1.087 10 3
Solution 1: complex eq 4.9997 10 5 M
35996.87 M -1
2.67075 1.087 10 3
Solution 2: complex eq 7.4997 10 5 M
35996.87 M -1
3.33819 1.087 10 3
Solution 3: complex eq -1
9.3747 10 5 M
35996.87 M
2
Reaction: Ni (2aq ) 4CN(aq ) Ni CN 4
( aq )
complexeq
Kf
M M
4
CN 4 complex eq Ni complex eq
4.9997 10 5 M
Solution 1: K f 2.055 1031
2 104 M 4 4.9997 105 M 2 104 M 4.9997 105 M
4
7.4997 10 5 M
Solution 2: K f 1.918 1031
3 104 M 4 7.4997 105 M 3 104 M 7.4997 105 M
4
9.3747 10 5 M
Solution 3: K f 1.823 1031
3.75 104 M 4 9.3747 105 M 3.75 104 M 9.3747 105 M
4
e. Note that the equation is not balanced. We can express the equilibrium of the equation in terms of the experimental K f values:
3
2Fe(3aq ) 12CN(aq ) 2 Fe CN 6 Kf 1
2
( aq )
2 1
3 Ni CN 4 3Ni (2aq ) 12CN(aq )
Kf 2
3
( aq )
3 Ni CN 4
2
2Fe 3
2 Fe CN 6
3
3Ni 2
K eq
Kf 1
2
1.032 10
42 2
1.476×10-10
Kf 2 1.932 10
( aq ) ( aq ) 3
( aq ) ( aq ) 31 3
6.
1 mol OH 1 1 mol solid
a. 8.43 ml 0.200 M 0.04215 M
1 mol HNO3 20 mL 2 mol OH
b.
Ba(OH)2 ● 8H2O Ba2+ 2OH- 8H2O
I --- 0 0 ---
C --- +x +2x ---
E --- x 2x ---
Ksp x 2x 4x3 4(0.04215)3 3.00×10-4
2
c. The effect of adding NaOH or Ba(NO3)2 is common-ion effect. For the fourth medium:
10 mL 0.1 M
[OH ] 0.01 M
10 mL 90 mL
Ba(OH)2 ● 8H2O Ba2+ 2OH- 8H2O
I --- 0 0.01 ---
C --- +x +2x ---
E --- x 0.01 + 2x ---
x 0.01 2x 3.00×10-4 x 0.03888 M [OH ] 0.01 2 0.03888 M 0.08777 M
2