Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

UP Academic League of Chemical Engineering Students (UP ALCHEMES)

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

UP Academic League of Chemical Engineering Students (UP ALCHEMES)

Academics Affairs Committee Review and Tutorials Program, AY 2013-2014


Chem 17 Second Exam (SAMPLE EXAM) Answer Key
I. Modified True or False
1. TRUE 6. orange light
2. 1.0 M NaOH < 0.3 M CaCl2 < 0.3 M KCl < 0.3 M 7. would occur
Na2SO4 < 1.5 M NaCl 8. cannot be prepared
3. to reverse 9. minimum
4. [Fe(H2O)5(OH)]2+ 10. lower than 7
5. Presence of pink [Co(H2O)6]2+ and blue [Co(Cl)4]2-
II. Multiple Choice
1. C 3. B 5. A 7. A 9. D 11. B 13. A 15. C
2. C 4. B 6. D 8. D 10. A 12. A 14. D
III. Problem Solving
1.
a. B – 1st endpoint, D – 2nd endpoint, F – 3rd endpoint
b. A – 1st half endpoint, C – 2nd half endpoint, E – 3rd half endpoint
c. At 1st half endpoint, pOH = pKb1. Therefore, pKb1 = 14 - 11.4 = 2.6
pK b1  pK b2
At 1st endpoint, pOH  . Therefore pK b2  2(14  9.085)  2.60  7.23
2
pK b2  pK b3
At 2nd endpoint, pOH  . Therefore pK b2  2(14  4.58)  7.23  11.61
2
20 mL  1.00 M
d. The molarity of the SAH sample (by using the first equivalence point) is  0.40 M
50 mL
0.40 M  50 mL
At the final endpoint, molarity of arsenic acid (conjugate) is  0.182 M .
50 mL  60 mL
From the pKb values, pK a  14  pK b . Thus, pKa1  2.39, pKa 2  6.77, pKa 3  11.40 .
Since the difference between pKa2 and pKa1 is large, then we can assume that contribution of H3O+ from pKa2 and pKa3 is
negligible.

H3A H2O H2A- H3O+


I 0.182 --- 0 0
C -x --- +x +x
E 0.182 - x --- x x

x2
 102.39  x   H3 O   0.02525 M  pH=-log  0.02525 M   1.60
0.182  x
0.40 M  50 mL 1.00 M  2 mL
e. Molarity of arsenic acid is  0.1786 M . Molarity of excess acid is  0.01786 M .
50 mL  62 mL 50 mL  62 mL

H3A H2O H2A- H3O+


I 0.1786 --- 0 0.01786
C -x --- +x +x
E 0.1786 - x --- x 0.01786 + x

 x  0.01786  x 
 102.39  x  0.01815 M  pH=-log  0.01786 M  0.01815 M   1.44
0.1786  x
1L 1 mol SAH 216.89 g
f. 20 mL  1.00 M     5.000 g  100%  86.76%
1000 mL 1 mol H+ 1 mol SAH
g. 1st endpoint – thymolphthalein, 2nd endpoint – bromocresol green, 3rd endpoint – thymol blue

2.
a. Note the equation for osmotic pressure:   Mtot RT . Using an ICE table we can find a formula for Mtot:

H2A H2O HA- H3O+


I c --- 0 0
C -x --- +x +x
E c-x --- x x
HA- H2O A2- H3O+
I x --- 0 x
C -y --- +y +y
E x–y --- y x+y

Therefore, the Mtot will be   H2 A    HA     A 2     H3 O   cacid  x  x  y  y  x  y  cacid  x  y


  x2 
Since  A 2   is negligible, then M tot  c acid  x   c acid  x,  log    pK a1
RT  cacid  x 
For aminomalonic:
  1.852  10-3 M  
2
0.2655 atm
x  0.009 M = 1.852  10 M  pK a1   log 
-3   3.32
L atm  0.009 M  1.852  10-3 M 
0.08206  298.15 K  
mol K
For citraconic:
  4.713  10-3 M  
2
0.3355 atm    2.29
x  0.009 M = 4.713 10 M  pK a1   log
-3
L atm  0.009 M  4.713  10-3 M 
0.08206  298.15 K  
mol K
For diethylmalonic:
  4.978  10-3 M  
2
0.3420 atm    2.21
x  0.009 M = 4.978  10 M  pK a1   log
-3
L atm  0.009 M  4.978  10-3 M 
0.08206  298.15 K  
mol K
For iminodipropionic:
  7.972  10-4 M  
2
0.2397 atm    4.11
x  0.009 M = 7.972  10 M  pK a1   log
-4
L atm  0.009 M  7.972  10-4 M 
0.08206  298.15 K  
mol K
For maleic:
  6.013  10-3 M  
2
0.3673 atm    1.92
x  0.009 M = 6.013  10 M  pK a1   log
-3
L atm  0.009 M  6.013  10-3 M 
0.08206  298.15 K  
mol K
pK a1  pK a 2
Note that for an ampholyte, pH   pK a 2  2pH  pK a1 .
2
For aminomalonic: pK a 2  2  6.575   3.32  9.83 . For citraconic: pK a 2  2  4.220   2.29  6.15 .
For diethylmalonic: pK a 2  2  4.750   2.21  7.29 . For iminodipropionic: pK a 2  2  6.860   4.11  9.61 .
For maleic: pK a 2  2  4.075   1.92  6.23
b.
H2A H2O HA- H3O+
I 0.001 --- 0 0
C -x --- +x +x
E 0.001 - x --- x x
x2
 101.92  x   H3 O    HA    9.283  10 4 M
0.001  x initial initial

HA- H2O A2- H3O+


I x --- 0 x
C -y --- +y +y
E x–y --- y x+y
9.283  10  y   y   10
4
6.23
 assume y is very small 
9.283  10   y   10
4
6.23

9.283  10  y 
4
9.283  10  4

y   A 2-  = 5.88×10-7 M,  HA    x  y  9.277×10-4 M,  H2 A   0.001  x  7.168×10-5 M


 H3 O   x  y  9.289×10-4 M  pH   log  9.289×10-4 M   3.03
c. pH 4.00 bufffer – iminodipropionate, pH 6.00 buffer – citraconate, pH 10.00 buffer - aminomalonate
d. millimoles buffer =  0.100 M  200 mL   20 mmol
For pH 4.00 buffer:
  HA   
 
4.00  4.11  log   0.776  H 2 A    HA    0.776  H 2 A    H 2 A   20 mmol
  H2 A  
 
 H2 A  11.26 mmol, HA    8.74 mmol
HA- H3O+ H2A H2O
I 20.00 11.26 0 ---
C -11.26 11.26 +11.26 ---
Final 8.74 0 11.26 ---

A2-
H3O+ HA- H2O
I 20.00
31.26 0 ---
C -20.00
-20.00 +20.00 ---
Final 0
11.26 20.00 ---
205.12 g 1 mL
20.00 mmol   4.1024 g Na 2 A , 31.26 mmol   20.84 mL HCl
1000 mol 1.50 mmol

For pH 6.00 buffer:


 A2  
  
6.00  6.15  log   0.708  HA     A 2    0.708  HA     HA    20 mmol
  HA   
 
 HA    11.71 mmol,  A 2    8.29 mmol
A2-
H3O+ HA- H2O
I 20.00
11.71 0 ---
C -11.71
-11.71 +11.71 ---
Final 8.29
0 11.71 ---
174.07 g 1 mL
20.00 mmol   3.4814 g Na 2 A , 11.71 mmol   7.81 mL HCl
1000 mol 1.50 mmol

For pH 10.00 buffer:


 A2  
  
10.00  9.83  log   1.479  HA     A 2    1.479  HA     HA    20 mmol
  HA  

 
 HA    8.07 mmol,  A 2    11.93 mmol
A2-
H3O+ HA- H2O
I 20.00
8.07 0 ---
C -8.07
-8.07 +8.07 ---
Final 11.93
0 8.07 ---
163.04 g 1 mL
20.00 mmol   3.2608 g Na 2 A , 8.07 mmol   5.38 mL HCl
1000 mol 1.50 mmol
3.
a. First, determine which cation precipitates first.
K sp 8.5  10 17 K sp 7.1 10 9
For AgI: I      3.4  10 15
M , for PbI 2:  I
 

    4.21 10 4 M .
 Ag   0.025  Pb2   0.04
K sp 6.5  10 4
For TlI: I      0.026 M . Thus AgI will be the first precipitate since it needs the least concentration of I - to
 Tl   0.025
precipitate. We can safely assume that Pb2+ will be the second cation to precipitate since the iodide concentration it needs to
precipitate is much smaller than what Tl+ needs.

When the number of moles of Ag reaches the number of moles of I stoichiometrically (its “equivalence point”), the equilibrium
concentration of iodide becomes Ksp  9.22  109 . Since the concentration of iodide is still small to induce precipitation of
PbI2, the second cation will precipitate after a certain volume of NaI from the “equivalence point”.
0.025M  50 mL
Thus mL of NaI to reach equivalence point   12.5 mL . Let x be the additional volume of NaI to be added.
0.1 M
After the equivalence point of AgI precipitation some concentration of I - will be produced due to equilibrium, but the Ksp of AgI
is so small that the additional concentration of I- is considered to be negligible. Thus, the solution can be simplified by only
considering the Ksp of PbI2.

Moles of Pb 0.04 M  50 mL  2.00 mmol :


2
 0.1 M  x mL 
 Pb2   I    7.1 109  
2 2 mmol 9
   7.1 10  x  0.296 mL
 x mL  50 mL  12.5 mL  x mL  50 mL  12.5 mL 
Thus the volume of NaI to be added just before the second cation precipitates is 0.296 mL  12.5 mL  12.80 mL
b. Moles of Ag: 0.025 M  50 mL  1.25 mmol , moles of NaI: 0.1 M  12.80 mL  1.28 mmol
Use ICE table to find the concentration of [Ag+] remaining in solution:
AgI Ag+ I-
Initial moles --- 1.25 1.28
Change in moles --- -1.25 -1.25
0.0296 mmol
Final Molarity --- 0  4.723  104 M
50 mL + 12.80 mL
C --- +x +x
E --- x 4.723×10-4 + x
8.5  1017
 
4.723  104  x  x   8.5  1017 , Assume x is very small  x 
4.723  104
 1.800  1013

1.800  10 13 M
% ppt'n   100%  7.20  10 10 %  0.1% , thus precipitation is complete.
0.025 M
c. Since the precipitating agent is different, it does not mean Pb2+ will be the second cation to precipitate.
2 mmol
 Pb2     0.03185 M ,  Tl    0.025 M  50 mL  0.0199 M
new 62.80 mL   new 62.80 mL
K sp 1.6  10 5 K sp 1.7  10 4
For PbCl2: Cl      0.0224 M , for TlCl: Cl      8.54  10 3 M
 Pb 
2
0.03185  Tl 

0.0199

Thus, Tl+ will be the second cation to precipitate. At the equivalence point, Cl    1.7  104  0.01303 M , which is not
enough to enduce precipitation of PbCl2. Thus, PbCl2 will precipitate after a certain volume of NaI from the “equivalence point”.

Since the Ksp of TlCl is slightly large, we must take into account the additional concentration of Cl - produced from TlCl after the
equivalence point. Let y be the additional concentration of Cl- from TlCl.

0.025M  50 mL
Moles of Tl: 0.025 M  50 mL  1.25 mmol , volume of NaCl to reach equivalence point is   2.5 mL .
0.1 M
TlCl Tl+ Cl-
Initial moles --- 1.25 0.5 M × (x + 2.5) mL
Change in moles --- -1.25 -1.25
0.5 M  x mL
Final Molarity --- 0
62.80 mL + x mL  2.5 mL
C --- +y +y
0.5 M  x mL
E --- y y
62.80 mL + x mL  2.5 mL

0.5 M  x mL
 Tl   Cl    1.7  104   y   
 y   1.7  10 4
 x mL  62.80 mL  2.5 mL 
2
2  2 mmol  0.5 M  x mL 
 Pb2   Cl    1.6  105     y   1.6  10 5
 x mL  62.80 mL  2.5 mL   x mL  62.80 mL  2.5 mL 
0.5 M  x mL 2 mmol
Let  y  m, n:
x mL  62.80 mL  2.5 mL x mL  62.80 mL  2.5 mL
1.7  10 
2
 ym  4
2
y2 2 mmol
   1.81 103  y  1.81 10 3 n  0.0425 
nm 2 1.6  105 n x mL  62.80 mL  2.5 mL

2
 2 mmol  0.5 M  x mL 2 mmol  5
    0.0425    1.6  10
 x mL  62.80 mL  2.5 mL  x mL  62.80 mL  2.5 mL x mL  62.80 mL  2.5 mL 
x  2.146 mL

Thus the volume of NaCl to be added just before the third cation precipitates is 2.146 mL  2.5 mL  4.65 mL

d. Based from the ICE table of TlCl, the amount of Tl+ remaining is also equal to y.
2 mmol
y   Tl    0.0425   7.319  10 3
x mL  62.80 mL  2.5 mL
7.319  10 3
% ppt'n   100%  29.28%  0.1% , thus precipitation is not complete.
0.025 M
e. Precipitation will be complete if the final concentration of cation is less than 0.1%.
2 mmol
 Pb2before

  0.0297 M   Pbfinal  0.0297 M  0.1%=2.97  10 5 M
2

67.44 mL
Let x be the mL of Na2SO4 needed.

PbSO4 Pb2+ SO42-


Initial moles --- 2 0.5x
Change in moles --- -2 -2
0.5x  2 mmol
Final Molarity --- 0
67.44 mL + x
C --- +2.97×10-5 +2.97×10-5
0.5x  2 mmol
E --- 2.97×10-5  2.97  105
67.44 mL + x
 0.5x  2 mmol 
  2.97  10 5   2.97  10 5   1.6  10 8  x  4.07 mL
 67.44 mL + x 
f. The fourth cation, based on the given Kf and Ksp data, is Fe3+. Find the concentration of [Fe(EDTA)]- and NH3 and the overall
equilibrium. We can safely assume that  Fe3    Fe(EDTA)  since the Kf value is very large.

 

Since the number of moles of Fe3+ is equal to the moles of EDTA4- and the Kf value is large, we can assume that the remaining
EDTA4- in equilibrium is negligible.

0.02 M  50 mL 3.0 M  15 mL
 Fe(EDTA)    0.0114 M,  NH3    0.514 M
   67.44  4.07  1.00  15  mL  67.44  4.07  1.00  15  mL

Fe  EDTA  Fe3  EDTA 4 
Fe3  3OH Fe  OH 3(s)
3NH3  3H2 O 3OH  3NH4

 Fe  EDTA   3NH3  3H2 O Fe  OH 3(s)  3NH4  EDTA 4 

[Fe(EDTA)]- 3NH3 H2O Fe(OH)3 3NH4+ EDTA4-


I 0.0114 0.514 --- --- 0 0
C -x -3x --- --- +3x +x
E 0.0114 - x 0.514 – 3x --- --- 3x x
 3x   x  Kb 
3 3

 K eq   0.0788  x  0.01137 M
 0.0114  x  0.514  3x 
3
K f K sp
 0.0114  0.01137  M
%ppt'n=  100%  0.45%  0.1% . Thus, precipitation is not complete.
0.0114 M
4.
a.
Reaction ∆H°, kJ/mol ∆S°, J/(mol K)
CO( g )  H2 O( g ) CO2( g )  H2( g ) -41 -74.1
CH4( g )  H2 O( g ) CO( g )  3H2( g ) (-206)×-1 (-230.7) ×-1
2CO2( g )  6H2( g ) 2CH3 OH( g )  2H2 O( g ) (-49.1)×2 (-161.2) ×2
2CH3 OH( g ) CH3 OCH3( g )  H2 O( g ) (37)×-1 (23.8)×-1
CH4( g )  CO2( g )  2H2( g ) CH3 OCH3( g )  H2 O( g ) 29.8 -189.6

kJ 1000 J 189.6 J J
Go  Ho  TSo  29.8    298.15 K   8.633  104
mol 1 kJ mol K mol
J
8.633  104
Go  RT ln K p  mol  ln K p  K p  7.50  10 16
J
8.314  298.15 K
mol K
2

K p  K c (RT)n , n  (1  1)  (1  1  2)  2  K c  K p (RT)2  7.50  10 16   298.15 K  0.08206 mol


L atm 
K

K c  4.49×10-13
J
29800
K p2 Ho  1 1  K p, 3500 K mol  1  1  11
b. ln      ln 16
    K p, 3500 K  4.48  10
K p1 R  T2 T1  7.50  10 J  3500 K 298.15 K 
8.314
mol K
2
 L atm 
K c  K p (RT)2   4.48  10 11   3500 K  0.08206   3.69  10
6

 mol K 
CH4   CO2    H2   8.00 M  0.33  2.64 M, 4  H2 O  H2 O  8.00 M  0.01
 H2 O  0.016 M, CH3 OCH3   4  0.016 M=0.064 M
 H2 O CH3 OCH3   0.064  0.016 
Q   2.108  10 5  K c , therefore reaction will shift to reverse.
CH4  CO2  H2   2.64  2.64  2.64 
2 2

CH4 CO2 2H2 CH3OCH3 H2O


I 2.64 2.64 2.64 0.064 0.016
C +x +x +2x -x -x
E 2.64 + x 2.64 + x 2.64 + 2x 0.064 - x 0.016 - x

 0.064  x  0.016  x 
 3.695  10 6  x  0.01242 M
 2.64  x  2.64  x  2.64  2x 
2

CH4   CO2   2.64  x  2.652 M,  H2   2.64  2x  2.665 M


CH3 OCH3   0.064  x  0.05158 M,  H2 O  0.016  x  3.579×10-3 M
c. nCH4  nCO2  2.652 M  10.0 L  26.52 mol, n H2  2.665 M  10.0 L  26.65 mol
nCH3OCH3  0.05158 M  10.0 L  0.5158 mol, n H2O  3.579  103 M  10.0 L  0.03579 mol,
ntotal   2.652  2.652  2.665  0.05158  3.579  103   10.0 L  80.2484 mol
Find the moles of reactant added to the reaction vessel:
1 mol 1 mol 1 mol
5000 g CH4   311.72 mol, 8000 g CO2   181.78 mol, 1000 g H2   495.05 mol
16.04 g 44.01 g 2.02 g
1 mol
1000 g Ar   25.031 mol
39.95 g
Find the new moles of reactant:
nCH4  26.52 mol  311.72 mol  338.24 mol, nCO2  26.52 mol  181.78 mol  208.30 mol
n H2  26.65 mol  495.05 mol  521.70 mol
Find the new total moles of the reaction vessel, and use Avogadro’s Law to find the final volume:
ntotal   338.24  208.30  521.70  0.5158  0.03579  25.031  1093.83 mol
n1 n 2  1093.83 mol 
  V2  10.0 L    136.31 L
V1 V2  80.2484 mol 
Find the new molarity of each reactant and product, and calculate Q:
338.24 mol 208.30 mol 521.70 mol
CH4    2.482 M, CO2    1.528 M,  H2    3.827 M
136.31 L 136.31 L 136.31 L
0.5158 mol 0.03579 mol
CH3 OCH3    3.784  103 M,  H2 O   2.626  10 4 M
136.31 L 136.31 L

Q
 3.784  10  2.626  10   1.788  10
3 4
8
 K c , thus the reaction will shift forward.
 2.482 1.528  3.827 
2

CH4 CO2 2H2 CH3OCH3 H2O


I 2.482 1.528 3.827 3.784×10-3 2.626×10-4
C -x -x -2x +x +x
E 2.482 - x 1.528 - x 3.827 - 2x 3.784×10-3 + x 2.626×10-4 + x

 3.784  10 3
 x  2.626  10 4  x 
 3.69  10 6  x  0.01223 M
 2.482  x 1.528  x  3.827  2x 
2

CH3 OCH3    3.784  103  0.01223 M  0.01601 M


L atm
Pfinal  0.01601 M  0.08206  3500 K  4.60 atm
mol K

5.
a. [Fe(CN)6]3- - red-orange, [Ni(CN)4]2- - yellow
0.01 M  10.00 mL M  mL cation
b. Mstd   0.001 M  Msample  std , Vtotal  20 mL
100 mL Vtotal
0.001 M  1.00 mL 0.001 M  4.00 mL
M1   5  105 M . M3   2  104 M .
20 mL 20 mL
0.001 M  2.00 mL 0.001 M  8.00 mL
M2   1 104 M M4   4  104 M
20 mL 20 mL

[Fe(CN)6]3- Absorbance [Ni(CN)4]2- Absorbance


5×10-5 0.5115 5×10-5 1.7810
1×10-4 1.0240 1×10-4 3.5610
2×10-4 2.0460 2×10-4 7.1200
4×10-4 4.0920 4×10-4 14.2400
[Fe(CN)6]3- - 10228.78x + 4.7826×10-4, [Ni(CN)4]2- - 35596.87x + 1.087×10-3.
slope 10228.78 M -1 35996.87 M -1
c.  , Fe complex   1022.88 M-1 cm-1 , Ni complex   3599.97 M-1 cm-1
path length 10 cm 10 cm
0.05 M  20 mL 0.01 M  mL Fe
d. For [Fe(CN)6]3-, M diluted CN   0.01 M, M Fe  , Vtotal  20.00 mL
100 mL Vtotal
0.01 M  mL CN-
MCN  , Vtotal  20.00 mL
Vtotal
0.01 M  4.00 mL
Solution 1: MCN  M Fe   2  103 M
20.00 mL
0.01 M  6.00 mL
Solution 2: MCN  M Fe   3  103 M
20.00 mL
0.01 M  7.50 mL
Solution 3: MCN  M Fe   3.75  10 3 M
20.00 mL
Absorbance   y  int 
complexeq 
slope
3.40994  4.7826  10 4
Solution 1: complex eq   3.333  10 4 M
10228.78 M -1
5.11474  4.7826  10 4
Solution 2: complex eq   4.9999  104 M
10228.78 M -1
6.39334  4.7826  10 4
Solution 3: complex eq   6.2499  104 M
10228.78 M -1

3
Reaction: Fe(3aq )  6CN(aq ) Fe  CN 6 
( aq )

Fe3+ 6CN- [Fe(CN)6]3-


I MFe MCN 0
C -x -6x +x
E MFe – x MCN – 6x x

complexeq
Kf 
M  M 
6
CN  6 complex eq Fe  complex eq
3.333  10 4 M
Solution 1: K f   9.088  1041
 2  10 M   2  10 M
3 4 6 3 4
M  6  3.333  10 M  3.333  10
4.9999  10 4 M
Solution 2: K f   1.038  1042
 3  10 M   3  10 M
3 4 6 3 4
M  6  4.9999  10 M  4.9999  10
6.2499  10 4 M
Solution 3: K f   1.149  1042
 3.75  10 M   3.75  10 M
3 4 6 3 4
M  6  6.2499  10 M  6.2499  10
9.088  1041  1.038  1042  1.149  10 42
Average   1.032 ×1042
3

0.01 M  10 mL 0.001 M  mL Ni
For [Ni(CN)4]2-: M diluted CN   0.001 M, M Ni  , Vtotal  20.00 mL
100 mL Vtotal
0.001 M  mL CN-
MCN  , Vtotal  20.00 mL
Vtotal
0.001 M  4.00 mL
Solution 1: MCN  M Ni   2  104 M
20.00 mL
0.001 M  6.00 mL
Solution 2: MCN  M Ni   3  104 M
20.00 mL
0.001 M  7.50 mL
Solution 3: MCN  M Ni   3.75  10 4 M
20.00 mL

Absorbance   y  int 
complexeq 
slope
1.78083  1.087  10 3
Solution 1: complex eq   4.9997  10 5 M
35996.87 M -1
2.67075  1.087  10 3
Solution 2: complex eq   7.4997  10 5 M
35996.87 M -1
3.33819  1.087  10 3
Solution 3: complex eq  -1
 9.3747  10 5 M
35996.87 M
2
Reaction: Ni (2aq )  4CN(aq )  Ni  CN 4 
( aq )

Ni2+ 4CN- [Ni(CN)4]2-


I MFe MCN 0
C -x -4x +x
E MNi – x MCN – 4x x

complexeq
Kf 
M  M 
4
CN  4  complex eq Ni  complex eq
4.9997  10 5 M
Solution 1: K f   2.055  1031
 2  104 M  4  4.9997  105 M   2  104 M  4.9997  105 M 
4

7.4997  10 5 M
Solution 2: K f   1.918  1031
 3  104 M  4  7.4997  105 M   3  104 M  7.4997  105 M 
4

9.3747  10 5 M
Solution 3: K f   1.823  1031
 3.75  104 M  4  9.3747  105 M   3.75  104 M  9.3747  105 M 
4

2.055  1031  1.918  1031  1.823  10 31


Average   1.932×1031
3

e. Note that the equation is not balanced. We can express the equilibrium of the equation in terms of the experimental K f values:
3
2Fe(3aq )  12CN(aq ) 2 Fe  CN 6   Kf 1 
2
( aq )

2 1
3 Ni  CN 4  3Ni (2aq )  12CN(aq )
 Kf 2 
3
( aq )

3 Ni  CN 4 
2
 2Fe 3
2 Fe  CN 6 
3
 3Ni 2
K eq 
 Kf 1 
2


1.032  10 
42 2

 1.476×10-10
 Kf 2  1.932  10 
( aq ) ( aq ) 3
( aq ) ( aq ) 31 3

6.
1 mol OH 1 1 mol solid
a. 8.43 ml  0.200 M     0.04215 M
1 mol HNO3 20 mL 2 mol OH
b.
Ba(OH)2 ● 8H2O Ba2+ 2OH- 8H2O
I --- 0 0 ---
C --- +x +2x ---
E --- x 2x ---
Ksp   x  2x   4x3  4(0.04215)3  3.00×10-4
2

c. The effect of adding NaOH or Ba(NO3)2 is common-ion effect. For the fourth medium:
10 mL  0.1 M
[OH ]   0.01 M
10 mL  90 mL
Ba(OH)2 ● 8H2O Ba2+ 2OH- 8H2O
I --- 0 0.01 ---
C --- +x +2x ---
E --- x 0.01 + 2x ---
 x  0.01  2x   3.00×10-4  x  0.03888 M  [OH ]  0.01  2  0.03888 M   0.08777 M
2

1 mol HNO3 1 mL titrant


0.08777 M  20 mL  -
  8.78 mL
1 mol OH 0.200 mmol
For the final medium:
25 mL  0.1 M
[Ba 2  ]   0.025 M
25 mL  75 mL
Ba(OH)2 ● 8H2O Ba2+ 2OH- 8H2O
I --- 0.25 0 ---
C --- 0.25 +2x ---
E --- 0.25 + x 2x ---
 0.25  x  2x   3.00×10-4  x  0.03525 M  [OH ]  2  0.03525 M   0.07051 M
2

1 mol HNO3 1 mL titrant


0.07051 M  20 mL  -
  7.05 mL
1 mol OH 0.200 mmol
1 mol OH 1 1 mol solid
 0.0543 M  K sp  4  0.0543 M   6.404  10 4
3
d. 10.86 ml  0.200 M   
1 mol HNO3 20 mL 2 mol OH
1 mol OH 1 1 mol solid
 0.0771 M  K sp  4  0.0543 M   1.833  10 4
3
15.42 ml  0.200 M   
1 mol HNO3 20 mL 2 mol OH
H  1  S
Note that G  RT ln K  H  TS  ln K    . The equation is in linear form. By plotting lnK vs. 1/T we
R T R
can get the value of ∆H and ∆S.
1/T, K-1 lnK
3.354×10-3 -8.113
3.245×10-3 -7.353
3.095×10-3 -6.302
8.394 J 1 kJ kJ
Equation:-6981x + 15.3036, H  slope  R  6981 K    58.05
mol K 1000 J mol
8.394 J J
S  y  int R  15.036 K    127.23
mol K mol K
Note that the calculated ∆H and ∆S corresponds to the dissolution of Ba(OH)2 ● 8H2O (reverse of precipitation). Thus, the
kJ J
calculated ∆H and ∆S will change signs. Hprecipitation  -58.05 , Sprecipitation  -127.23
mol mol K

e. KCl, NaCl, NaNO3

You might also like