International Journal of Ecosystem 2012, 2(3): 32-37

DOI: 10.5923/j.ije.20120203.01

Studies of Water Arsenic and Boron Pollutants and Algae

Phytoremediation in Three Springs, Iran
Noori Mitra1,*, Zakeri Rezvan2, Mazaheri Seyed Ahmad3, Mahmudy Gharaie Mohamad Hosein3

1
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Arak University, Arak, 38156-8-8349, Iran
2
Department of Geology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran
3
Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciencet, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

Abstract Today drinking water quality, water pollutant and cleaning water are important topics in applied hydrology.
Algae play an important role in controlling metal concentration in lakes and oceans. Their ability to absorption metals and
taking up toxic elements from the environment has been recognized for many years. The study is examination of the possible
extent of Arsenic and Boron algae phytoremediation in three springs from Sang-E-Noghreh area, Iran, by calculating
bio-concentration and bio-accumulation factors in them. Water samples from the sites were separately collected for mi-
croscopy, ICP/MS analyzing and graphitic oven. Algae were identified and counted using available equipment and references.
Data analyzed and bio-concentration (BCF) and bio-accumulation factors (BAF) were calculated for Boron and Arsenic.
Results showed four algal divisions (Chlorophyta, Cyanophyta, Euglenophyta and Heterokontophyta) in all of sample sites
waters with the exception of Gargab that lacked Euglenophyta. Boron and Arsenic BAF were higher than 10 in all three sites.
It is believed that algal flora of three springs have absorbed and accumulated these elements from their environment into their
bodies. Then these algae can be hyper-phytoremediator and their presence in water reduced water Arsenic and Boron pol-
lutant.
Keywords Biological treatment, Algae, Phytoremidiation, Arsenic, Boron, Iran

concentration having poisonous potential from the standards,

1. Introduction can produce irreparable environmental effects[7]. A variety
of both biotic and abiotic factors have been implicated in
Many environmental pollutants move through food chains determining the boundaries of species distributions and wa-
and accumulate at sizeable levels in the tissues of animals ter qualification. Biotic factors important to segregation
and man[1,2]. A high environmental persistence and high include resources, predators and aquatic macrophytes.
lipophilicity chemicals should be thoroughly investigated for Abiotic factors such as dissolved oxygen, temperature and
their potential toxicity through bioconcentration and bioac- light can also influence the distribution of aquatic spe-
cumulation, both measured for long periods of exposure. cies[8,9]. So, studying biological and physico-chemical
Phytoremediation is one new approach that offers more factors of water is necessary for finding suitable and eco-
ecological benefits and a cost efficient alternative. The plant nomic ways for water quality improvement. Biological fil-
used in the phytoremediation technique must have a con- tration of water is one of the standard and economical
siderable capacity of metal absorption, its accumulation and methods in comprising with other methods. Some living
strength to decreasethe treatment time[3]. The chemical organisms such as algae are able to reduction or removing
compounds bioconcentration and bioaccumulation in aquatic toxic elements by absorption from their environment. This
and terrestrial organisms represent important criteria for method is called phytoremediation[10]. Phytoremediation is
ecotoxicological evaluation and hazard assessment[4,5]. considered the remediation technique that generates the
Recent developments in environmental research have re- lowest negative environmental impact on the remediation
vealed that many living organisms can accumulate certain sites and can be applied into newly developed urban areas
toxicants to body concentrations much higher than present in because of its high public acceptance and its function as an
their environments[6]. aesthetical pleasure[11].
Water pollution is one of the human problems in recent Algae are a group of living organisms that play an im-
c e n t u r y. I t i s k n o wn a s i n c r e a s i n g s o me e l e me n t portant role in controlling metal concentration in lakes and
oceans[12,13] and the density and absorption of pollutants
* Corresponding author:
such as heavy metals in their environment[10]. The ability of
m-noori@araku.ac.ir (Mitra Noori)
Published online at http://journal.sapub.org/ije
algae to absorb metals has been recognized for many years.
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved Algae possess the ability to take up toxic elements from the
 International Journal of Ecosystem 2012, 2(3): 32-37 33

environment, resulting in higher concentrations than those in bio-accumulation factors in algae.

the surrounding water[11,14]. Bioaccumulation studies re-
veal the accumulation of the contaminant in the organism via 2. Materials and Methods
uptake of food or water containing the contaminant[15].
Arsenic have been classified as group I carcinogens based 2.1. Study Site
on human epidemiological data[16]. Some aquatic macro- Experiments were carried out in Sang-E-Noghreh Village
phytic species (Eichhornia crassipes, Lemna gibba, Lemna in 115 Km to South-East of Mashhad-Khorasan Razavi, Iran
minor, Spirodela polyrhiza, Ipomoea aquatic, Azolla caro- and 40 km to South of Fariman. The area is located on long.
liniana, Azolla filiculoides, Azolla pinnata, Pistia stratiotes, 35° 26´ to 35° 30´ N and lat. 59° 50´ to 59° 52´ E with 1077
Hydrilla verticillata and Lepidium sativum) have been re- hectare sureface area, 1600-2830 m altitude from sea sure-
ported to accumulate high level of arsenic from contami- face. For studies of algal flora and Arsenic and Boron algae
nated water. Their arsenic uptake ability, mechanisms and phytoremediation with calculating bio-concentration and
their potential in phytoremediation technology have been bio-accumulation factors in Sang-E-Noghreh, three springs
studied and evaluated[9]. (Arrehe kamar=A1, Zireh Ghaleh=A2 and Gargaab=A3)
Boron contamination is a serious environmental problem were selected (Figure 1).
affecting both ecosystems and human activities[17]. Expo-
2.2. Sampling and Analyses
sure to large amounts of boron over short periods of time can
affect the stomach, intestines, liver, kidney, and brain and In March, 2010 water samples from the sites were col-
can eventually lead to death[18]. In order determining the lected for ICP/MS analyzing after measuring some water
environmental fate of released chemicals from different physical factors such as pH and temperature using HDPE
pollutant sources, to determine their bioconcentration in vials. Each water sample was filtered using 0.45 µ micro
aquatic species is essential. Bio-concentration factor (BCF) filter and then poured in the labeled vial. Then samples pH
of a chemical compound is defined as the ratio between the was regulated by adding nitric acid and stored at 4℃ until
concentration of that chemical in an organism (Corg) and the sending to the Canadian Acme Laboratory. Also for algal
concentration of the chemical compounds in the aqueous flora studies three groups of algal samples were collected.
environment (Cm) [2,19-26]. The calculation of BCFs can be First group of algal samples were collected for studying
based on the wet weight (BCFw) or on the lipid content density without any fixation, Second group was fixed for
(BCFl), of the aquatic organism or its tissue. BCFs are usu- identification using fixative (0.1 M Sodium Cacodylate
ally determined for various species of fish, but other aquatic and %6 Glutaraldehyde) and third group were collected in
organisms can be used, such as algae or mussels. Aquatic sterile vial for element concentration measurement. All of
organisms can accumulate chemical compounds both di- samples were put into the aluminum cover and kept in 4℃.
rectly from the environment (via skin or respiratory surface) Then, samples were transferred to the laboratory. Algae of
and indirectly (by collecting and concentrating a chemical first and second group samples were identified using light
compound from food). This process is called bioaccumula- microscopy and available references[30-34]. Counting of
tion, and is measured with the bioaccumulation factor (BAF) samples was undertaken based on Lobban et al (1998)[35]
which is defined as the ratio of the concentration of a method. Third group samples were dried using 80℃ oven for
chemical accumulated inside an organism (Corg) to the 24 hours. After sample digestion and filtration, boron and
concentration in the surrounding environment (Cm) arsenic concentration was measured using Shimaduz.AA-
[1,2,4,16]. The bioaccumulation level depends on the nature 670 graphitic oven.
of the chemical compound, species, duration of exposure, 2.3. Data Analysis
concentration in water and its accumulation level in food[27].
Data were analyzed using the EXCEL2007 software. Figure
BAF was categorized as: <1 excluder, 1-10 accumula-
2 show four identified algal division concentrations in three
tors, >10 hyper accumulators[28,29]. Shamsuddoha et al.
springs of Sang-E- Noghreh area in winter. Also bio- con-
(2006) in their studies on growing algae in rice fields showed
centration (BCF) and bio-accumulation factors (BAF) were
that algae can hyper accumulate as from water[14]. Also a
calculated for Boron and Arsenic elements in three examined
rice variety receiving arsenic-contaminated irrigation water
spring waters. Results have been shown in Table 1.
ranging from 0 to 2.0mg as/L, and grown with and without
algae, showed that the presence of algae in the growth me-
dium reduces as accumulation in rice. The pot experiment 3. Results
showed that algae could reduce accumulation of arsenic in Results of algal flora studies showed existing four algal
rice plants by as much as 71%. Algal growth was also found divisions (Chlorophyta, Cyanophyta, Euglenophyta and
to depress arsenic accumulation in soil[15]. Heterokontophyta) in all of sample sites waters with the
The present study is an attempt to examine the possible exception of A3 site that lacked Euglenophyta. Table 1 and
extent of phytoremediation Arsenic and Boron by algae in Figure 2 show the divisions concentrations in three springs
three spring waters from Sang-E-Noghreh area (Khorasan-e- (Arrehe kamar=A1, Zireh Ghaleh=A2 and Gargaab=A3) of
Razavi), Iran by calculating bio-concentration and Sang-E- Noghreh area in winter. The most algal genera
34 Noori Mitra et al.: Studies of Water Arsenic and Boron Pollutants and Algae Phytoremediation in Three Springs, Iran

variation was observed in A3. A1 had the highest level of their environment into their bodies. Then these algae can be
family and order numbers (Table 1). A1 site showed the hyper-phytoremediator and their presence in water reduced
highest Chlorophyta and Cyanophyta density (mm3), while, water Arsenic and Boron pollutant. In A3, by the reason
Heterokontophyta had the highest concentration in A3 site Heterokontophyta high density and low density of Cyano-
(Figure 1). Also Arsenic and Boron concentrations in water phyta, its Arsenic and Boron water is more than two other
and algae samples from these springs (BFCs) and their sites. Based on these results it can be concluded that existing
bio-accumulation factors (BAFs) have been shown in Table pectocellulose compounds in Chlorophyta and silica in
1. As the Table shows algal Arsenic concentration (ppb) of Heterokontophyta cell walls have prevented of Arsenic and
A1 site is higher than two others, whiles, A2 had the most Boron high level absorption from their environment. Pepti-
algae Boron concentration (ppb). A1 site showed the highest doglycan cell wall presence in Cyanophyta cell wall and
level of Arsenic and Boron bio-accumulation factors (BAFs) absence of silica and pectocellulose may be caused more
(Table 1). absorption of these two elements from water in comparison
with Chlorophyta and Heterokontophyta. Studies of
4. Discussion and Conclusions physic-chemical effects of water especially heavy metals
Based on our results it is believed that absences (in A3) or concentrations on algae density in three springs of
low density presences (in A2 and A3) of Euglenophyta in all Sang-E-Noghreh area, Iran in winter showed that positive
three studies sample sites in winter depended on low water correlations between Arsenic concentration and Heterokon-
temperature(Figure 1). As Shayestehfar et al (2010) showed tophyta density[10]. Phytoremediation of waters by aquatic
temperature regulates the density and diversity of zoo- organisms such as algae has been recently explored for the
plankton in freshwater. Their data showed that maximum removal of organic pollutants possessing endocrine dis-
zooplankton density occurred in 26.5℃ to 28.1℃ air and rupting capacity (39). Also Sjahrul (2012) reported using
water temperature[36]. Also Khodaparast(1998) studies marine phytoplanktons (Tetracelmis chuii and Chaetoceros
showed the most frequency of Euglenophyta was observed in calcitrans) as phytoremediators (40). Sekabirak et al (2010)
increasing water temperature and entering organic com- studies showed that algae have the potential to accumulate
pounds into the water[37]. Chlorophyta density was nearly Pb, Cd, Cu, and Zn. Algae can thus be used in
equal in all three sample sites. But it was more in A1 com- bio-monitoring of heavy metal pollution in urban stream
paring to A2 and A3 and Cyanophyta density was much water since it can be used in quantification of pollutants.
more in A1 too. Our data comparison with WHO (World Concentrations of heavy metals in algal biomass reflect
Health Organization) standard showed water Arsenic con- metal load in the stream water. Algae can therefore be used
centration is higher than drinking water standard limit in A3 in the phytoextraction process of heavy metals in aquatic
site, but A1 and A2 are in standard limit. Boron in A2 and A3 urban stream water and wastewater effluents (41). Imamul
water samples was higher than drinking water standard limit, Huq et al (2007) showed that Navicula (a Heterokontophyta
while A1 was in standard limit[38] (Table 1). Also genus) was able to Arsenic bio-absorption from its envi-
bio-accumulation factors (BAFs) for these elements were ronment) [15]. According to our results and above cases pure
higher than 10. Therefore Chlorophyta and Cyanophyta are cultivation of each algae genus from Chlorophyta, Cyano-
hyper-absorbent and hyper-accumulator for Arsenic and phyta and Heterokontophyta in different pollutant media is
Boron[28]. Comparison of Arsenic and Boron BAFs in three separately suggested. Then, it can be exactly help us for a
studied sites showed the highest level in A1 for both ele- clear conclusion about accumulated or remediated algae
ments(Table 1). It is believed that Chlorophyta and Cyano- taxa.
phyta have absorbed and accumulated these elements from
Table 1. Results of water samples algal studies and their analysis using microscopy, ICP/MS and graphitic oven methods from three springs in
Sang-E-Noghreh area, Iran (Arrehe kamar=A1, Zireh Ghaleh=A2 and Gargaab=A3) and their Arsenic and Boron bio-concentration (BCF) and
bio-accumulation factors (BAF) in winter
Factors Sample sites (Springs)
ArrehKamar (A1) Zireh Ghaleh (A2) Gargaab (A3)
Algae Arsenic concentration (ABCFA) ppb 75086 18386 16198
Water Arsenic concentration (WBCFA) ppb 6.5 2.3 22.70
BAF of Arsenic (ppb) 11551.69 7993.91 713.57
Algae Boron concentration (ABCFB) ppb 165210 267370 191200
Water Boron concentration (WBCFB) ppb 211 1194 1260
BAF of Boron (ppb) 782.99 223.93 151.75
Chlorophyta density in mm3 (in winter) 381 300 307
Cyanophyta density in mm3 (in Winter) 5347 1753 1824
Euglenophyta density in mm3(in Winter) 19 6 0
Heterokontophyta density in mm3 (in Winter) 106 33 427
Algal orders numbers 9 5 5
Algal families number 13 6 9
Algal genera numbers 18 7 20
 International Journal of Ecosystem 2012, 2(3): 32-37 35

Figure 1. Water and algae sampling sites location in Sang-E- Noghreh area, Iran

Total Chlorophyta Density Total Cyanophyta Density

Total Euglenophyta Density Total Heterokonteophyta Density
5347

6000
Algea density in mm3

5000

4000

3000
1824
1753

2000
427
307
381

300

1000
106

33
19

0
6

Sample sites
Figure 2. Four identified algal division concentrations in three springs of Sang-E- Noghreh area, Iran in winter

JOHNCKE U. 1994. The assessment of bioaccumulation,

Chemosphere, 29: 1501–1514.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
[2] FEIJTEL T, KLOEPPER-SAMS P, DEN HAAN K, VAN
The authors would like to thank of M. Zakeri for her helps EGMOND R, COMBEE M, HEUSEL R, WIERICH P, TEN
in collecting and determination of some samples. BERGE W, GARD A, WOLF W & NIESSEN H. 1997. In-
tegration of bioaccumulation in an environmental risk as-
sessment, Chemosphere, 34: 2337–2350.
[3] MUDGAL V, MADAAN N & MUDGAL A. 2010. Heavy
metals in plants: phytoremediation: Plants used to remediate
REFERENCES heavy metal pollution, Agric. Biol. J. N. Am., 1 (1): 40-46.
[4] MACKAY D & FASTER A. 2000. Bioaccumulation of
[1] FRANKE C, STUDINGER G, BERGER G, BOHLING S, persistent organic chemicals: mechanism and models, Envi-
BRUCKMANN U, COHORS-FRESENBORG D & ron, Pollut., 110: 375-391.
36 Noori Mitra et al.: Studies of Water Arsenic and Boron Pollutants and Algae Phytoremediation in Three Springs, Iran

[5] VOUTSAS E, MAGOULAS K & TASSIOS D. 2002. Pre- [20] IVANCIUC O. 2003. Aquatic toxicity prediction for polar
diction of the bioaccumulation of persistent organic pollutants and nonpolar narcotic pollutants with support vector ma-
in aquatic food webs, Chemosphere, 48: 645-651. chines, Internet Electron, J. Mol., Des., 2: 195–208.
[6] KORD B; MATAJI A & Babaie S. 2010. Pine (Pinus Eldarica [21] HANSCH C & Leo A. 1995. Exploring QSAR. Fundamentals
Medw.) needles as indicator for heavy metals pollution, Int. J. and applications in chemistry and biology, American Chem-
Environ. Sci. Tech., 7 (1): 79-84. ical Society, Washington, DC, pp: 580.
[7] ZAKERI R, MAZAHERI S A, MAHMUDY GHARAIIE M [22] GRAMATICA P & Papa E. 2003. QSAR modeling of bio-
H, Noori M and Sayareh A. 2011a. Geology effect of concentration factor by theoretical molecular descriptors,
Sang-E-Noghreh area (South of Fariman) on the water re- QSAR Comb., Sci., 22: 374–385.
source pollution to arsenic and boron, 15th Geological So-
ciety of Iran Congress, 14-15 Desember 2011, Tehran-Iran. [23] DEVILLERS J, DOMINE D, BINTEIN S & KARCHER W.
1998. Fish bioconcentration modeling with log P, Toxicol.,
[8] BOZKURT A & GUYEN S. E. 2009. Zooplankton compo- Methods, 8: 1–10.
sition and distribution in vegetated and unvegetated area of
three reservoirs in Hatay, Turkey, Journal of Animal and [24] DEARDEN J C & SHINNAWEI N M. 2004. Improved pre-
Veterinary Advances, 8 (5): 984-994. diction of fish bioconcentration factor of hydrophobic
chemicals, SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 15: 449–455.
[9] AZIZUR RAHMAN M & HASEGAWA H. 2011. Aquatic
arsenic: Phytoremediation using floating macrophytes. [25] HU H, XU F, LI B, CAO J, DAWSON R & TAO S. 2005.
Chemosphere, 83 (5): 633–646. Prediction of the bioconcentration factor of PCBs in fish us-
ing the molecular connectivity index and fragment constant
[10] ZAKERI R, NOORI M, ZAKERI M, MAZAHERI S A, models,Water Environ, Res., 77: 136–150.
MAHMUDY GHARAIIE M H. 2011b. Studies of the phy-
sico-chemical effects of water especially heavy metals con- [26] DAVIES R P & DONAS A J. 1984. The prediction of bio-
centration on algae density in three springs of concentration in fish, Water Res., 18: 1253–1262.
Sang-E-Noghreh area (fariman) in winter, 1th National
Conferences of Phycology of Iran, Shahid Beheshti Univer- [27] IVANCIUC T, IVANCIUC O & KLEIN D J. 2006. Modeling
sity, 14-15 September 2011, Tehran-Iran. the bioconcentration factors and bioaccumulation factors of
polychlorinated biphenyls with posetic quantitative super
[11] CHANG P, KIM J Y & KIM K W. 2005. Concentrations of structure/activity relationships (QSSAR), Molecular Diver-
arsenic and heavy metals in vegetation at two abandoned sity, Springer, 10: 133–145.
mine tailings in South Korea, Environmental Geochemistry
and Health, 27: 109–119. [28] BAKER A J M. 1981. Accumulators and excluders- strategies
in tha response of plants to heavy metals, J. Plant Nutri., 3
[12] SIGG L. 1985. Metal transfer mechanisms in lakes; role of (1-4): 643-654.
settling particles, In: Chemical Processes in Lakes, Stumm, W.
(ed.), Wiley Interscience, New York, pp. 283–310. [29] MA L Q., KOMAR K M, TU. C, ZHANG W, CAI Y &
KENELLY ED. 2001. A fern that hyper-accumulates arsenic,
[13] SIGG L. 1987.Surface chemical aspects of the distribution Nature, 409: 579-582.
and fate of metal ions in lakes. In: Aquatic Surface Chemistry,
Stumm, W. (ed.), Wiley Inter science, New York. P. 319–348. [30] RAHIMIAN H. 1978. Phycology, Iran Meli University Pub-
lication, No. 152, Tehran.
[14] SHAMSUDDOHA A S M, Bulbul, A & IMAMUL HUQ S M.
2006. Accumulation of arsenic in green algae and its subse- [31] MOHAMEDI H. 1984. A Beginner's Guide to Freshwater
quent transfer to the soil–plant system, Bangladesh J. Micro- Algae (Belcher H. and Swale E.) Institute of Technical Fi-
biol., 22 (2): 148–151. shery Publication, Ofset Sahami Am Iran Company Print,
First Edition.
[15] IMAMUL HUQ S M, BINTE ABDULLAH M & JOARDAR
J C. 2007. Bioremediation of arsenic toxicity by algae in rice [32] LEE R E. 1999. Phycology, Cambridge University Press, 3th
culture, Land Contamination & Reclamation, 15 (3): Edition, Cambridge.
327-334. [33] BROIDE J & LEWIEE E. 2007. The Systemetics Association
Special Volume Series 75 Unravelling the algae the past,
[16] MEYLAN W M, HOWARD P H, BOETHLING R S, present,and future of algal systematic, CRC Press is an im-
ARONSON D, PRINTUP H & GOUCHIE S. 1999. Improved portant of Taylor & francis Group, an Information business,
method for estimating bioconcentration/ bioaccumulation 376p.
factor from octanol/water partition coefficient, Environ.,
Toxicol., Chem., 18: 664–672. [34] NOORI M & AHMADI A. 2007. Thallophytes, Sabike Pub-
lications, Iran.
[17] KAYAMA Y. 2010. Treatments of Severely Bo-
ron-Contaminated Soils for Phytorestoration, Phytorestora- [35] LOBBAN S C, CHAPMAN J D & Kremer P D B. 1988.
tion, Spring, pp: 1-17. Experimental Phycology, A Laboratory Manual, Cambridge
University Press, UK.
[18] HUGHES M F. 2002. Arsenic toxicity and potential me-
chanisms of action. Toxicol., Lett., 133 (1): 1-16 . [36] SHAYESTEHFAR A, NOORI M & SHIRAZI F. 2010.
Environmental factor effects on the seasonally changes of
[19] ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). zooplankton density in Parishan Lake (Khajoo Spring site),
2010. Toxicological profile for boron. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Iran, Asian Journal of Experimental Biological Sciences, 1
Department of Health and Human Services, Public (4): 840-844.
 International Journal of Ecosystem 2012, 2(3): 32-37 37

[37] KHODAPARAST SH. 1998. Final report of Talab-e-Anzali green alga Monoraphidium braunii and the role of natural
hydrology and hydrobiology project from 1992 to 1996, Fi- organic matter. Sci Total Environ, 416: 501-506.
shery Research Center of Gilan Province.
[40] SJAHRUL, M. 2012. Phytoremediation of Cd2+ by Marine
[38] WHO. World Health Organization, Chemical fact sheets, Phytoplanktons, Tetracelmis chuii and Chaetoceros calci-
Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. First Addendum To trans. International Journal of Chemistry, 4 (1): 69-74.
Third Edition, 2008: 296-405.
[41] SEKABIRA K, ORYEM ORIGA H, BASAMBA TA,
[39] GATTULLO CE, BAHRS H, STEINBERG CE & LOF- MUTUMBA G & KAKUDIDI E. 2010. International Journal
FREDO E. 2012. Removal of bisphenol A by the freshwater of Environment Science and Technology, 8 (1): 115-128.