Cabiling vs. Fernandez
Cabiling vs. Fernandez
Cabiling vs. Fernandez
ISSUE: Whether or not the omission negates their rights to Filipino citizenship as children of a
Filipino mother, and erases the years lived and spent as Filipinos.
RULING: No. Petitioners complied with the first and second requirements upon reaching the age
of majority. It was only the registration of the documents of election with the civil registry that
was belatedly done. We rule that under the facts peculiar to the petitioners, the right to elect
Philippine citizenship has not been lost and they should be allowed to complete the statutory
requirements for such election. Having a Filipino mother is permanent. It is the basis of the right
of the petitioners to elect Philippine citizenship. Petitioners elected Philippine citizenship in form
and substance. The failure to register the election in the civil registry should not defeat the election
and resultingly negate the permanent fact that they have a Filipino mother. The lacking
requirements may still be complied with subject to the imposition of appropriate administrative
penalties, if any. The documents they submitted supporting their allegations that they have already
registered with the civil registry, although belatedly, should be examined for validation purposes
by the appropriate agency, in this case, the Bureau of Immigration. Other requirements embodied
in the administrative orders and other issuances of the Bureau of Immigration and the Department
of Justice shall be complied with within a reasonable time.