Aristotle Concept of Tragedy
Aristotle Concept of Tragedy
Aristotle Concept of Tragedy
A tragedy is the imitation of an action that is serious, and also as having magnitude, complete in itself
in language with pleasurable accessories, each kind brought in separately in the parts of the work; in a
dramatic form with incidents arousing pity and fear.
The definition clearly falls into two parts.
a)The first part tells us about the nature of tragedy, its object, manner, and medium of imitation.
b)The second part points out the function of tragedy.
2) Character:
The ideal tragic hero should not be perfectly good, nor utterly depraved. Ideal tragic hero should be the
mixture of virtue and human frailty.his misfortune should come from about an error of judgement,
and he must fall from a height of glorious position.
3)Thought:
Thought Is the intellectual element in tragedy and it is expressed through character.
4) Diction:
Thought is expressed through diction.
5)spectacle: the spectacle has more to do with stage effects acording to Aristotle. For
instance Pity and fear are produced through spectacle.(mtlb apk samny koi tragedy hvi ha r ap ne dekhi
ha to ye tragedy dekhny se apko khof r dukh hva ha na..to spectacle ka mtlb he dkhna ha).
6)Song : for comic relief …( tragedy mn audience k lyee.. thora stress kum krne k lyee songs
ka use kia jata ha through chorus)…………………..
Next topic:
The four essentials of characterization
According to Aristotle, “Tragedy idealises—imitates men as better
(or higher)—and Comedy caricatures, i.e. shows men as worse (lower)
than they actually are.” The characters in a tragedy should be lifelike,
convincing, acceptable, consistent, reasonable, and impressive. They
should be people of better sort.
The four essentials of characterization as mentioned by Aristotle
Poetics are as follows :—
1-A character is good, if his words and actions reveal that his purpose is good. Entirely
wicked characters, even when assigned minor roles, are unfit for tragedy. Wickedness may be
introduced only when required by the necessities of the plot. Wanton or wilful introduction of
wickedness must be avoided; and when introduced even wicked characters must be made good
in some respects. Wickedness must be mixed up with some good as in actual life.
2-The characters must be appropriate, that is, must be true to type or status. For example, a
woman must be shown as womanly and not manly, a slave must be given a character
appropriate to his status, and the king to his kingly status. Manliness would not be appropriate
in a woman, and vice versa. If the characters are taken from some known myth or story, they
must be true to tradition.
3-The characters must be true to life. They must have the virtues and weaknesses, joys and
sorrows, loves and hatreds, likes and dislikes, of average humanity. It is essential to arouse to
feeling of pity and fear in the spectators. If they are not true to life, they would not be able to
arouse fear and pity. The characters must be of an intermediate sort, mixtures of good and evil,
virtues and weaknesses, like us.
4-Fourthly, the characters must be consistent. They must be true to their own natures, and
their actions must be rational, not rash. There should be no sudden changes in character. If the
dramatist has to represent an inconsistent person, then he must be, ‘consistently inconsistent.’
And lastly, “The ideal there must be an intermediate kind of person, a man not primarily
virtuous or just, whose misfortune, however, is brought upon him not by vice or depravity, but
by an error of judgement.” Furthermore, he must be a man of’reputation and prosperity’.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………….
About these ads
Loading...