Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    (# - Title) TEMPLATE v.4

    Uploaded by

    刘王钟
    This case involved a dispute between Petitioners A and Respondents B. A sued B, and the CA ruled in B's favor. A then appealed to the SC. The main issue was whether [state issue]. The SC ruled [state ruling], based on [state basis/doctrine/provision used]. The disposition was that [state disposition].

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    (# - Title) TEMPLATE v.4

    Uploaded by

    刘王钟
    8 views1 page
    This case involved a dispute between Petitioners A and Respondents B. A sued B, and the CA ruled in B's favor. A then appealed to the SC. The main issue was whether [state issue]. The SC ruled [state ruling], based on [state basis/doctrine/provision used]. The disposition was that [state disposition].

    Original Title

    [#_Title] TEMPLATE v.4 (2).docx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This case involved a dispute between Petitioners A and Respondents B. A sued B, and the CA ruled in B's favor. A then appealed to the SC. The main issue was whether [state issue]. The SC ruled [state ruling], based on [state basis/doctrine/provision used]. The disposition was that [state disposition].

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    8 views1 page

    (# - Title) TEMPLATE v.4

    Uploaded by

    刘王钟
    This case involved a dispute between Petitioners A and Respondents B. A sued B, and the CA ruled in B's favor. A then appealed to the SC. The main issue was whether [state issue]. The SC ruled [state ruling], based on [state basis/doctrine/provision used]. The disposition was that [state disposition].

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    TITLE OF THE CASE

    Case No. Date Ponente


    Petitioners Respondents

    SYNOPSIS:
    This should be sufficient to summarize the case when recited. Crammer-friendly summary. Must contain the issue and ruling to
    related to the syllabus.

    PROCEDURAL HISTORY:
    Story of how the case got to the SC or what kind of petition it is as it was filed in the SC

    Example: A sued B. B appealed to the CA. CA ruled in B’s favor. A appeals to SC.
    FACTS OF THE CASE: detailed narration of the antecedents. If it can be as short as the recit-ready very without leaving
    important details, just delete the recit-ready and put them here.

    Petitioners’ claims

    Respondents’ claims

    ISSUES: Ruling
    1. Whether… Yes/No
    RULING/RATIONALE:
    1. Please provide the basis/ doctrine/ provision/ statute/ stare decisis used.
    LAWS, STATUTES, CODES INVOLVED:
    “Title: Description.” Verbatim.

    Treat this as a word bank for all important terminologies, laws, etc.
    DISPOSITION:
    The “WHEREFORE” part

    eg. X is found guilty of crimes 1,2, and 3., Petition is denied on grounds of reason 1,2, and 3.
    DICTA RELATING TO DOCTRINE:
    Very important to note since the purpose of the cases is to relate them to the doctrines taught in class
    SEPARATE RULINGS:
    Concurring, dissenting, separate opinions, if available
    CASES CITED IN CASE:
    Pang magis na hahaha. Cases cited by the justice in his decision. Maybe a brief summary or background of the case if it was
    important to the present case. If not, then just the quote or simply the title.

    PLEASE ADJUST THE MARGINS AS NECESSARY.

    Made by: Last Name, First Name.

    You might also like