ITIL Intermediate Lifecycle Service Transition Sample1 SCENARIO BOOKLET v6.1
ITIL Intermediate Lifecycle Service Transition Sample1 SCENARIO BOOKLET v6.1
ITIL Intermediate Lifecycle Service Transition Sample1 SCENARIO BOOKLET v6.1
Please note that by downloading and/or using this document, you have agreed to comply with the terms of
use outlined below:
1. All sample (electronic or paper based) papers are for personal use only.
2. The sample papers are intended for the following use only:
For use as study aid/s for candidates who wish to sit an ITIL Intermediate examination, or
3. By downloading a complimentary digital copy of any of the ITIL Intermediate sample papers, you
agree not to:
Reproduce or copy;
forward or share;
4. If you wish to use the whole or part, of any of this sample paper, for any purpose other than self-study
or reference, please contact AXELOS Accreditation Team (examinations@axelos.com).
ITIL® Intermediate Lifecycle Stream:
SCENARIO BOOKLET
This booklet contains the scenarios upon which the 8 examination questions will be based. All
questions are contained within the Question Booklet and each question will clearly state the scenario
to which the question relates. In order to answer each of the 8 questions, you will need to read the
related scenario carefully.
On the basis of the information provided in the scenario, you will be required to select which of the
four answer options provided (A, B, C or D) you believe to be the optimum answer. You may choose
ONE answer only, and the Gradient Scoring system works as follows:
• If you select the CORRECT answer, you will be awarded 5 marks for the question
• If you select the SECOND BEST answer, you will be awarded 3 marks for the question
• If you select the THIRD BEST answer, you will be awarded 1 mark for the question
• If you select the DISTRACTER (the incorrect answer), you will receive no marks for the
question
In order to pass this examination, you must achieve a total of 28 marks or more out of a maximum of
40 marks (70%).
The bank recognizes that implementing consistent change management requires them to develop
and implement a single process that will be followed across all of IT and that one of the keys to
success will be consistent change assessment and authorization.
During the awareness campaign there has been significant resistance from various stakeholders. The
major concern is that putting in place a more formal change management process will increase the
level of bureaucracy and decrease the IT organization’s capability to respond quickly to new or
changing business requirements. The stakeholders fear this will result in IT service provision that falls
further behind current requirements, or that staff will try to bypass the new process.
One of the goals for the organization is to reduce the number of major incidents that are change-
related. Currently about 70% of all major incidents are caused by failed changes. The chief
information officer (CIO) at the bank feels that the only way to reduce the number of failed changes is
to implement a single process that is documented with complete process workflows, procedures and
roles and responsibilities.
Recently, several projects were implemented to change major systems across each business area.
Several key stakeholders complained that these enhancements did not result in the expected
improvements. In fact, some changes on systems had unintended impacts on other business areas.
Based on this feedback, IT implemented a formal change evaluation process to assist the other
service transition processes already in place and ensure the issues recently experienced by
stakeholders would be avoided in any future changes.
The new change evaluation process provides an evaluation plan for the change manager. The plan
identifies how to evaluate any change in order to understand its intended effects and identify potential
unintended effects.
The change manager does not see how this will help and complains that this alone will not be
enough. The change manager suggests that the change evaluation process needs to go further by
seeking to better understand the effects of a change on the business and by providing more helpful
outputs to improve service transition capabilities. The current process manager for service validation
and testing is not sure what should be done.
The CIO has performed an assessment and believes that IT can deliver better service quality if a
more structured service management approach is adopted. The CIO has implemented ITIL in previous
IT organizations and believes this is the right approach.
In meetings with senior IT managers it is revealed that ITIL was tried previously and failed. At the
time, IT staff didn’t think that any changes were necessary and so they refused to accept and use ITIL
practices.
Faced with possible outsourcing, some IT staff are willing to try ITIL again but others are still resistant.
The CIO knows that a successful ITIL programme must focus on managing organizational change in
addition to implementing new practices. The CIO decided to hire an organizational change expert to
address the potential staff resistance and assist in the smooth adoption and use of ITIL.
• IT has rolled out applications and upgrades which have unexpectedly impacted services that
the business field agents use to record sales, resulting in a loss of revenue
• Some of the service and service level requirements the business passes to IT for changes
seem to be lost, forgotten or ignored by IT
• IT seems to implement some projects on their own and the business cannot determine their
value
Based on the CEO’s feedback, the CIO believes that the way IT brings new services and
improvements to the business is not well managed and that implementing some service transition
processes will address the issues and will demonstrate IT’s value.
The organization would like to move to a service lifecycle approach, starting with service transition. A
key to success is ensuring that service transition can support the organization’s aggressive move to
cloud-based services. Service transition must also focus on delivering what the business requires as a
priority, within financial and other resource constraints.
You are the newly designated service transition manager. Having once worked in one of the
company’s largest business units, you understand the competitive nature of the industry in which the
company operates and the need to rapidly deploy new and innovative services. You also know that IT
has not always responded as quickly as needed, prompting some business units to bypass IT and
deploy externally hosted cloud-based services in support of some internal business processes. These
business units are now struggling to support and manage changes to these services and are working
with IT to:
To establish an ongoing commitment to service transition, both business and IT management must be
convinced that service transition can address the challenges facing the organization and deliver
measurable benefits.
The technical managers want the CMS to capture information about hardware components plus all of
the 50 attributes they currently maintain in a spreadsheet.
The application managers want the CMS to contain very detailed application information. They want
their own CMS so they can limit access.
The service desk wants to see CI information related to incidents and problems but not all the
technical details. They need CIs linked to services to effectively determine priorities.
Change management wants to see the CI relationships to conduct impact analysis. The change
manager believes that a single configuration management database (CMDB) should hold information
on services, systems and components.
Working as a consultant within the change management and SACM teams, you have been asked to
give guidance on how best to determine a realistic initial scope for SACM and meet key stakeholders’
needs.
There are several roles already established for change management, including a process owner and
a process manager as well as a change advisory board (CAB) structure. Given the small size of the
company and the low complexity of the systems, the change manager is able to handle all of the
performance and risk evaluations. The incident management process manager also maintains the
integrated service management tool suite for all process areas, and is responsible for the incident
management process.
The incident management process manager is concerned about the additional effort required to
maintain a configuration management system (CMS) and suggests that creating a dedicated
configuration management system (CMS) and tools administrator role should be considered to handle
technical housekeeping of the CMS.
There is disagreement among the newly appointed SACM process owner and other process owners
and managers as to what the appropriate roles should initially be for the SACM process and in which
order they should be introduced.
The processes are each successful in terms of their own execution and goals. However, the chief
information officer (CIO) is noticing some trends that are not common among mature IT organizations,
such as:
• Inconsistent process documentation and execution across incident, problem and change
management
• Staff are frequently solving similar issues on new or changed services during release and in
early operations
• Unexpected service outages due to changes
The CIO feels that what is needed to help rectify the issues that these trends illustrate is to formally
implement service transition (ST). Funding for this is available and in order to obtain it, the CIO has
been asked to articulate what ST requires to be successful.