Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Piston Comparison I & II PH

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Ph - 1 Tabulation of results

Stress Deflection Thermal


N/mm2 mm Flux
S.No Material
W/m2K

1 Aluminium Alloy 12.437 0.0016 1.231

2 Cast Iron 13.789 0.0111 1.799

3 Metal Matrix Composite (MMC) 11.659 0.00182 1.203

4 Ceramic Matrix Composite (CMC) 12.067 0.003658 2.210

Future scope of the second phase is the computational flow analysis diesel

with hydrogen mixed engine piston. From the I phase the metal matrix

composite piston having good properties and results are selected for the flow

analysis. Flow analysis is done in metal matrix composite piston.at the end of

the analysis two other piston B aluminium alloy and piston C Ceramic Matrix

Composite is also compared. Cast iron piston is not considered since the

material is not compatible with hydrogen


From the graph it is well clear that metal matrix composite is suitable for

hydrogen fueled engine also.

You might also like