Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 24 views

    Persuasive Essay Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Charles Abel
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating persuasive essays. It assesses essays across 7 criteria on a scale of 1 to 4: amount of information, creativity, essential question, quality of information, sequence, writing conventions, and documentation. An essay that scores a 4 would completely address the topic with thoroughly supported statements and facts. It would demonstrate the student's own interpretation through creative visual aids and answer the essential question accurately. The information would be clear, sequenced logically, free of errors, and come from reputable sources with complete documentation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Persuasive Essay Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Charles Abel
    24 views2 pages
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating persuasive essays. It assesses essays across 7 criteria on a scale of 1 to 4: amount of information, creativity, essential question, quality of information, sequence, writing conventions, and documentation. An essay that scores a 4 would completely address the topic with thoroughly supported statements and facts. It would demonstrate the student's own interpretation through creative visual aids and answer the essential question accurately. The information would be clear, sequenced logically, free of errors, and come from reputable sources with complete documentation.

    Original Description:

    zxcderfvbgtyh

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides a rubric for evaluating persuasive essays. It assesses essays across 7 criteria on a scale of 1 to 4: amount of information, creativity, essential question, quality of information, sequence, writing conventions, and documentation. An essay that scores a 4 would completely address the topic with thoroughly supported statements and facts. It would demonstrate the student's own interpretation through creative visual aids and answer the essential question accurately. The information would be clear, sequenced logically, free of errors, and come from reputable sources with complete documentation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    24 views2 pages

    Persuasive Essay Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Charles Abel
    The document provides a rubric for evaluating persuasive essays. It assesses essays across 7 criteria on a scale of 1 to 4: amount of information, creativity, essential question, quality of information, sequence, writing conventions, and documentation. An essay that scores a 4 would completely address the topic with thoroughly supported statements and facts. It would demonstrate the student's own interpretation through creative visual aids and answer the essential question accurately. The information would be clear, sequenced logically, free of errors, and come from reputable sources with complete documentation.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Persuasive Essay Rubric

    4 3 2 1
    Amount of Topic was completely Topic was addressed. Most Topic was addressed. Topic was not addressed.
    Information addressed. Statements statements were Some statements were Statements were not supported
    were clearly supported by supported by facts and supported by facts and by facts or examples.
    many facts and detailed examples. examples.
    examples.
    Creativity Project demonstrated Used student-created Information was factual Project was built from a
    student's own materials as well as but showed little student template, designed only as
    interpretation and existing material from interpretation. Project prescribed, or was based entirely
    expression of research other sources. Student based primarily on sample on sample work.
    material. Used graphs, devised a creative way to work. Student added one
    charts, or other visual aids design or deliver the or more original ideas.
    to display information in project.
    multiple ways.
    Essential All information was Subject knowledge was Information was relevant, Information was confusing or
    Question accurate and was delivered evident. but details and examples irrelevant. Had few supporting
    effectively. Subject Information included did not address the details or examples. Did not
    knowledge was thorough. details and strong essential question. Subject answer the essential question.
    Extensive details and examples that provided a knowledge was evident, Subject knowledge was not
    relevant examples were clear answer to the but was not used to sufficient to make successful
    used to answer the essential question. support argument. argument.
    essential question.
    Quality of All information was clear Used relevant information. Information related to the Information did not include
    Information and came from reputable Included many details and topic, but project needed details or examples that related
    sources. Extensive details strong examples that came more details and examples to the topic. Information did not
    and relevant examples were from reputable sources. to fully support ideas. come from a reliable source.
    used to support the
    content.
    Sequence Information was sequenced Information was Information did not always Information was not clear and did
    in a logical manner. sequenced in a logical flow logically between not flow in a logical order.
    Information was organized manner. Ideas flowed paragraphs or pages.
    so that the viewer was between paragraphs and
    ready to accept, or expect, pages.
    the next idea.
    Writing No spelling, grammar, Fewer than 5 spelling and More than 5 spelling and More than 10 spelling and
    Conventions capitalization or grammar errors. Fewer grammar errors. More grammar errors. More than 10
    punctuation errors. than 5 capitalization and than 5 capitalization and capitalization and punctuation
    Sentences are all well- punctuation errors. One punctuation errors. Less errors. Many sentences show
    formed. or two flawed sentences. than 5 sentences show flawed structure.
    flawed structure.
    Documentation Bibliography or credits were Bibliography or credits Bibliography or credits Did not include
    complete were were bibliography or credits.
    and flawlessly formatted. complete. All information incomplete. Less than half One or two sources
    All sources and of the were cited.
    were cited and media media sources were cited. sources were cited.
    included captions
    showing source.
    Score Your Own Draft
    Maximum Possible
    Points Earned Multiplier Total Points
    Points
    Amount of
    x3.5 14
    Information
    Creativity x3.5 14
    Essential Question x3.5 14
    Quality of
    x3.5 14
    Information
    Sequence x3.5 14
    Writing
    x3.5 14
    Conventions
    Documentation x3.5 14

    You might also like