I. O. Macari, Lecture 10: Ugliest Person You've Ever Seen)
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10: Ugliest Person You've Ever Seen)
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10: Ugliest Person You've Ever Seen)
I, 2014
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10
As the unitary constituent of the verb phrase, the lexical/main verb is the central element that
determines the functional and meaning relations in a clause. Its valency selects the rest of the elements
in the clause.
3
As identified by Biber, Conrad and Leech in The Longman student grammar of spoken and written English.
London: Longman, 2002.
4
A constituent is unitary if it has only one part. For example, if a sentence has just one main clause (as is the case
with simple and complex sentences) then that one clause is the unitary constituent of the sentence; similarly if a
phrase has just one word, then that single word is the unitary constituent of the phrase. (Lunn)
5
catenative verb = a verb--such as keep, promise, want, seem, and many others--that can link with other verbs to
form a chain or series. A catenative verb (also called a chain verb) takes a nonfinite clause as its complement.
(Nordquist)
sem. I, 2014
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10
Main verbs must occur in any normal clause or sentence (with the exception of verbless clauses
and ellipsis). Lexical verbs have the following characteristics:
A Morphological
Lexical verbs have different forms signalling tense (present and past), aspect (perfect,
progressive), and voice (active and passive). (see 5.2.)
Like nouns, several verbs have no suffixes: call, walk, etc.
Many of the verbs that do have suffixes are of Latin, Greek or French origin; some of
verbs were already suffixed when they were borrowed: magnify, agonize, realize.
By the addition of certain suffixes, nouns or adjectives can be turned into main verbs:
prefix noun base derived verb with suffix
-ate assassin, different assassinate, differentiate
-(i)fy beauty, class beautify, classify
-ize/-ise alphabet, apology alphabetize, apologise
-en Height Heighten
prefix adjective base derived verb with suffix
-ate active activate
-(i)fy simple simplify
-ize/-ise Actual actualize
-en black, deep blacken, deepen
Verb prefixes do not normally change the word class, yet they do change the meaning
prefix meaning of prefix Examples
re- again reabsorb, rebuild, redefine, refinance
dis- opposite, apart disarm, disconnect, discontinue, dislike
over- too much, across, beyond overbook, overcome, overeat, overhear
un- opposite, in reverse unbend, uncouple, unfold, unload, unpack
mis- wrong, poorly misbehave, mishandle, misinform,
out- beyond, further outdo, outgrow, outperform, outweigh
Regular verbs have only four morphological forms. These forms involve three suffixes
added to a base:
form Example Use
base Walk infinitive, present tense except 3rd person sg, and subjunctive
base +suffix -(e)s Walks 3rd person sg present tense
base + suffix -ing Walking ing-participles (as in progressive aspect)
base +suffix –ed Walked simple past tense and ed-participles/past participle, as in perfect and passive
constructions)
For most irregular verbs (their number approaches 200 in normal use and exceeds 250 if
prefixed forms are counted), the -s form and the -ing participle can be predicted from the
base form. Only three forms, known as the principal parts of the verb, show
irregularities:
sem. I, 2014
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10
the base form: the verb be has eight forms throughout the present tense; the
verbs have, do and say have irregular -[e]s forms; defective verbs, such as the
modal auxiliaries lack most inflection.
past form
-ed participle form
irregular verbs can be grouped into seven classes according to whether or not three
features apply to their principal parts:
the past and -ed participles are identical;
the base vowel is the same in the other two principal parts;
the past and -ed participle have inflectional endings.
Class I Class II
base form past form -ed part. base form past form -ed part.
bend bent bent mow mowed mown
earn earnt earnt shear sheared shorn
build built built show showed shown
learn learnt learnt swell swelled swollen
have had had
smell smelt smelt
make made made
spoil spoilt spoilt
The verbs in bold in the 2nd column also have The past is regular, but the participle has an -n
regular variants: earn, earned, earned inflection. All the verbs have regular variants for the
participle: mow, mowed, mowed.
6
As identified by Biber, Conrad and Leech in The Longman student grammar of spoken and written English.
London: Longman, 2002.
7
Prepositional verbs are also known as „verbs with obligatory prepositions‟, and this name shows, in a simplified
way, that they are fixed expressions.
sem. I, 2014
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10
3) phrasal-prepositional verbs contain both an adverbial particle and a preposition, as in get
along with = be on good terms/work well with, look back on = remember the past, look
forward to = await or anticipate with pleasure. Like prepositional verbs, phrasal-prepositional
verbs are followed by a prepositional object: According to new research, not getting along
with colleagues is the top reason for leaving a job (The Guardian).
4) other multi-word verb constructions:
a. verb + NP + preposition: e.g. have a finger in, have/take a look at, etc.
b. verb + NP + PpP: e.g. take sth to heart, take sth into account, etc.
c. verb + verb: e.g. , go get, make do, etc.
Biber et al (2002, pp. 124-6) identify three adequate criteria for distinguishing among the types
of multi-word combinations:
1) whether or not there is an idiomatic meaning
2) whether or not particle movement is possible
3) how the wh-question is formed.
The first distinction they make is based on the presence or absence of a following NP:
The nature of a multi-word expression is determined by whether or not there is a
following noun phrase. When there is no following noun phrase (e.g. shut up or go
away), there are only two possible interpretations. It must be either an intransitive
phrasal verb, or a free combination of verb + adverb. If there is a following noun
phrase (e.g. find out the meaning), there are three possible interpretations. Either it is a
transitive phrasal verb, a transitive prepositional verb, or a free combination of
verb + adverbial prepositional phrase (Biber, Conrad, & Leech, 2002, p. 124).
1) Checking for an idiomatic meaning is less reliable for the non-native speaker of English than
the other criteria, but it can still be useful for distinguishing between an intransitive phrasal verb
and a free combination when there is no following NP. Intransitive phrasal verbs usually have an
idiomatic meaning (as in Calm down! = become more relaxed or less angry/upset), while the
words in free combinations retain their own meanings (as in Don’t look back! = do not look
behind you).
2) When there is a NP after the multi-word combination, prepositional verbs can be confused
both with transitive phrasal verbs and with free combinations. The confusion arises because of
the similar appearance of the prepositional complement/object of the preposition following the
prepositional verb or the verb in the free combination, and the propositional adverb 8 following
the phrasal verb or the verb in the free combination.
prepositional verb He looked after his old mother.
(verb+obligatory preposition)
8
A prepositional adverb is an adverb which is identical (or similar) in form to a preposition to which it is also
related in meaning, for example on, by, off, over, about, past. (Words like out and away can be considered
prepositional adverbs because of their close relations to the complex prepositions out of and away from.)
Prepositional adverbs, unlike their matching prepositions, do not have a prepositional complement. For example, in
He jumped over the fence, over is a preposition, but in He jumped over it is a prepositional adverb. Similar examples
are: She fell down the stairs and She fell down. (Leech, A Glossary of English Grammar, 2006, pp. 89-90)
sem. I, 2014
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10
free combination He looked behind the computer.
(verb + preposition)
transitive phrasal verb He looked up the word in a dictionary.
(verb+prepositional adverb)
free combination He looked behind and hurried his step.
(verb+prepositional adverb)
If the particle can be placed both before and after the NP 9, then it is an adverbial particle and the
multi-word combination is a phrasal verb 10 , if not, it is a preposition and the multi-word
combination is either a prepositional verb or a verb + preposition free combination.
prepositional verb He looked his old mother after.
(verb+obligatory preposition)
free combination He looked the computer behind.
(verb + preposition)
transitive phrasal verb He looked the word up in a dictionary.
(verb+prepositional adverb)
free combination -
(verb+prepositional adverb)
3) The wh-question formation is useful for distinguishing between a transitive prepositional verb
+ object (typically formed with what or who/whom) and a free combination of verb + adverbial
prepositional phrase (typically formed with where and when).
prepositional verb Who/whom did he look after?
(verb+obligatory preposition) He looked after his old mother.
free combination Where did he look?
(verb + preposition) He looked behind the computer.
If we try fronting the particle, we can additionally distinguish between transitive prepositional
verbs and phrasal verbs.
prepositional verb After who/whom did he look?
(verb+obligatory preposition) He looked after his old mother.
transitive phrasal verb Up what did he look?
(verb+prepositional adverb) He looked up the word in a dictionary.
However, such verb + particle combinations can belong to more than one class, depending on the
context.
phrasal verb He ran over the cat. = hit with a vehicle
9
This is true about the majority of the transitive phrasal verbs, with the exception of two classes of such verbs:
inseparable phrasal verbs and separated phrasal verbs. With inseparable phrasal verbs the object NP occurs after
the adverbial particle (come across [a rare book] = find by chance, go over [something] = review, run into
[someone] = meet unexpectedly). With separated phrasal verbs, the NP functioning as object always occurs
between the verb and the adverbial particle. Examples: fit [somebody/something] in = to provide a place or time for,
get [a plumber] in = to arrange for someone to do a job in your home, get [a message] through = convey; transmit,
see [this nightmare] through = survive, overcome.
10
When the object of a transitive phrasal verb (underlined in the example) is a pronoun, the adverbial particle is
always placed after the object: He felt too hot in the winter coat, so he took it off.
sem. I, 2014
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10
free combination He ran over the bridge. = run across something
From the observation above it is easy to infer that main verbs can be contrasted with auxiliary
verbs, and the following characteristics of the auxiliary verbs can be identified:
Unlike main verbs, auxiliaries do not have lexical meaning (think of the auxiliaries in
Romanian: if one says am mers, he/ she does not express any kind of possession, though
the verb a avea is used!)
Auxiliary verbs always come before the main verb. Examples (the main verb is in bold):
has read, has been reading, are reading, may have been reading. The same is true about
Romanian (a citit, va citi, va fi citind)
The primary verbs be, have and do can function as either auxiliary or main verbs.
Compare I don't like such things and I don't do such things. In the first example do is
used as an auxiliary (operator), and comes before the main verb like, while in the second
it is used as both an auxiliary preceding the main verb do, and as a main verb.
Auxiliaries are irregular in form. Be, for example, has eight forms: am, is, are, was, were,
be, being, been. Have has four forms: has, have, had, having and do has five forms: does,
do, did, done, doing. Notice that done and doing cannot be used as auxiliary forms.
In Romanian, all the auxiliary verbs (a fi, a avea, a voi, a vrea) are primary verbs,
although, when used as auxiliaries, they have reduced flexion, as in the forms of a fi in
conjuctiv perfect (fi for all persons – să fi mers), of a avea in perfect compus (a instead of
are for 3rd person sg, as in el a mers vs el are o carte, etc.), and so on.
The primary auxiliaries are different from each other and from the other auxiliaries. They
are used for the following forms:
be for a. the progressive : was walking
b. the passive : was walked
have for the perfect : has walked
do as the dummy operator : did walk
Auxiliaries can only occur together with a main verb (except in cases of ellipsis). When
used as auxiliaries, the primary verbs be, have and do are exclusively followed by non-
finite forms of the verb, as in:
is working be + present participle progressive
is worked be + past participle passive
has worked have + past participle perfect
does not work do + not + bare infinitive dummy operator
An interesting definition (Hudson) contrasts auxiliaries, catenatives and operators:
An auxiliary verb is a catenative which is also an operator.
The author identifies the auxiliary verbs defined by this criterion as follows:
be when followed by a non-finite verb (is working, was chosen, is to go)
sem. I, 2014
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10
have when followed by a past participle (have finished)
do when followed by an infinitive (did know)
will, shall, can, may, must, ought
(for some speakers) used, dare and need.
Hudson concludes that an auxiliary verb is a verb that combines two characteristics:
Support: It can support11 another verb.
Other distinctions: It allows subject inversion, negation, contraction but it does not allow
do-support and may not show subject agreement.
In English there are nine central modal verbs: can, could, may, might, shall, should, will, would
and must.
Modal verbs add meanings relating to modality to the lexical verb. Ability (can, could),
possibility or permission (can, may), obligation, necessity or likelihood (must, should),
prediction, intention or hypothesis (will, would), etc. are examples of modal meanings.
One grammatical approach groups all the modal auxiliaries except for must in pairs: will – would, can -
could, may -might, shall -should. Two types of relations can be identified between the members of a
modal pair:
1. Since the second member is, historically, the past tense form of the former, it can express
a past time reference. Compare I can swim now. [present time reference] and I could swim
when I was a child. [past time reference].
2. In instances such as Can you help me? [present time reference] and Could you help me?
[present time reference], there is no difference in what regards the time reference. The
variation resides in the degree of politeness of the requests expressed in the two
examples. By generalizing this observation, we may say that there is a variation in the
degree of politeness, possibility, likelihood etc. as expressed by one or the other of the
members of a modal pair.
Modal auxiliaries have the following major characteristics:
They always function as operators, as in Can you help me? or in I can’t, I’m sorry. As we
can see in the two examples, they are placed before the subject to form questions and
before not in negation. (see 2.4.2.)
Except for may, modals occur in negative contractions: won’t, can’t, shan’t, mustn’t,
wouldn’t, couldn’t, mightn’t, shouldn’t.
Like any other auxiliary, modals always come before the main verb: may be working,
could have gone.
They are always followed by the bare infinitive (in one of its forms) of another verb, for
example can be, can have done, can be done, etc.
11
They are each followed by a non-finite verb (raining, been, overcharged) which they 'support' in various ways.
The term 'auxiliary verb' refers to this support role. (Hudson)
sem. I, 2014
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10
They are defective verbs, that is, they have no other forms, such as -s forms, -ing forms or
-ed forms.
They can only appear in finite clauses, as in
I pray [that you may succeed].
I pray [for you to may succeed].
Need and dare are dual-function verbs, as they can behave either like modal auxiliaries (You
needn’t have brought flowers; How dare you?) or like main verbs (You do not need to get there
before 9; I didn't dare to say that aloud.). In the auxiliary use, these verbs function as the
operator for negation and interrogative.
5.4.2.4. Semi-modals12
12
As identified by Biber, Conrad and Leech in The Longman student grammar of spoken and written English.
London: Longman, 2002.
sem. I, 2014
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10
have got report for duty within a week.) most situations. It is more common in an
I have got to talk to her. (= I have to/must talk to informal style.
her.)
Did you have to do that? (was that necessary?)
Most semi-modals are fixed expressions, which cannot be inflected for tense or person.
However, some of them, like have to and be going to, are exceptions to this rule (past tense: She
had to get him out of there; third-person agreement: I don't think he is going to come.)
Some semi-modals can co-occur with a modal verb or another semi-modal (co-occurrence with a
modal: They may have to leave soon; co-occurrence with another semi-modal: I'm going to have
to charge you extra for that. Sorry!13
Together with dare and need, used to and ought to are on the boundary between the category of
the modal auxiliaries and that of lexical verbs, as they have characteristics from both. Thus, they
have negative contractions (usedn't and oughtn't) besides the do/did negative and interrogative,
but negation in general is quite uncommon with these verbs. Notice that used to and ought to are
followed by the to-infinitive:
A catenative is a part of the verb phrase which is not among the auxiliaries, but it is followed by
another verb (which functions as the main verb in the VP) in the to-infinitive, bare infinitive or
present participle/gerund.
In He deserves to win the cup, deserve is a catenative verb followed directly by the to-infinitive
of win.
The verbs in this class are called catenative because of their ability to form chains, as in the
(quite extreme) example below.
He decided to agree to try practicing playing the guitar every day.
Most catenatives accept one form only; a few can take both infinitive and gerund forms, in which
case sometimes there is a difference in the meaning of the two structures. Compare
She stopped to look at the brochure. (= stopped with the purpose of looking at the brochure)
and
She stopped looking at the brochure. (= ceased the activity of looking at the brochure)
Catenatives form a class with fuzzy edges between auxiliary and lexical verb. They resemble
auxiliaries in having little meaning and in supporting a main verb in a verb-phrase, and lexical
verbs in not being an obligatory part of any grammatical construction (i.e. a catenative verb is
not obligatory in the formal marking of tense, aspect or voice.). They are like main verbs in
requiring the do operator in questions and negative statements (Compare Were they working? and
Did they keep working?)
13
According to www.phrasemix.com, this structure is used to talk about something that you need to do, but which
might annoy your listener. It is similar to going to need to, but friendlier-sounding. Going to have to is also used
to talk about things that you have to do in the future. Just a heads up - we're going to have to meet soon.
14
As described by Hasselgård, in Glossary of grammatical terms used in English Grammar: Theory and Use (2nd
edition) and Verbs and verb phrases.
sem. I, 2014
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10
AUXILIARIES
As you can see in the tables below, catenative verbs may have aspectual meanings, denoting the
start, unfolding, or end of an action (e.g., stop running, get to like, continue to read), or modal
meanings such as „certainty‟ and „usuality‟ (seem to like, appear to be, tend to occur).
Aspectual catenatives (marking an activity as being in its initial, middle or final stage):
catenative aspectual meaning example
keep continuous activity They kept walking.
start initiated activity They started walking.
stop ended activity They stopped walking.
get initiated activity We should get moving.
tend habitual activity We tend to stay too long.
Modalizing catenatives (making reservations as to truth value; hedging expressions):
catenative modal meaning example
seem probability (judging These young women are not the angels they seem to be.
from appearances) The arguments seem to support a different conclusion.
appear probability They appear to have changed their minds.
suppose likelihood (according He was supposed to be in court that morning.
to expectation) Nothing on four legs was supposed to be faster than a lion
over a short distance.
suppose obligation They're not supposed to look at women.
assume possibility They're assumed to be dangerous.
The catenative get may be an alternative marker of the passive voice (get married, get paid), thus
serving the same function as the grammatical auxiliary be.
Danny and Sheila got married.
The car got wrecked in the crash.
Unlike auxiliaries, catenatives require do-insertion (or the support of another finite operator) in
negative and interrogative
Did Danny and Sheila get married? not Got Danny and Sheila married?
Be careful – don't get mugged! not Be careful – get not mugged!
A comprehensive list of catenative verbs and example sentences can be found in the Appendix:
English catenative verbs (http://en. wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix%3AEnglish_catenative_verbs
)
Exercises
de terminat The Noun din Limba Engleză, Exerciţii pentru admiterea în învăţământul
superior;
8. For each of the following sentences, decide if the word or phrase in bold is a participle, a
gerund, or an infinitive.
1. The wine urges me on, the bewitching wine, which sets even a wise man to singing and
to laughing gently and rouses him up to dance and brings forth words which were better
unspoken. (Homer)
2. The wine urges me on, the bewitching wine, which sets even a wise man to singing and
to laughing gently and rouses him up to dance and brings forth words which were better
unspoken. (Homer)
3. There are many ways of breaking a heart. Stories were full of hearts broken by love, but
what really broke a heart was taking away its dream--whatever that dream might be.
(Pearl Buck)
4. There are many ways of breaking a heart. Stories were full of hearts broken by love, but
what really broke a heart was taking away its dream--whatever that dream might be.
(Pearl Buck)
sem. I, 2014
I. O. Macari, Lecture 10
5. Happiness is having a large, loving, caring, close-knit family in another city. (George
Burns)
Further practice
http://www.englishpage.com/gerunds/index.htm
http://www.englishpage.com/verbpage/verbtenseintro.html