Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Word, Word-Form, Lexeme: 21 October 2011

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 22

Word, word-form, lexeme

21 October 2011
Word
 Morphology – the study of the structure of words
 Lexicology – the study of the stock of words (lexis,
lexicon) in a given language.
 Word is of central importance to lexicology
 In morphology, the word is not sufficient in the analysis,
because there are smaller units.
 What do we mean by the term word in lexicology?
 Not easy to define word. Why?
Word
 Speech is a continuous stream of sound without a clear
division into units, but it can be analysed into meanngful
elements which recur and combine according to rules.
 In writing, such an analysis is expressed through the division
into words and sentences.
 The essence of grammatical units is that they are meaningful
and combine with each other in systematic ways. We may
distinguish a hierarchy of units:
 A sentence consists of clauses, a clause consists of one or
more phrases, a phrase consists of one or more words, a
word of one or more morphemes, a morpheme consists of
one or more phonemes.
Definition of Word
 The term word is used to designate an intermediate
structure smaller than a whole phrase and yet larger
than a single sound segment.
 It can be defined depending on whether we focus on its
representation, the thought which it expresses, or
purely formal criteria.
 However, although it may be difficult to define word,
even nonliterate speakers can divide the speech chain
into words.
First definition
 This definition relies mainly on writing traditions that
separate by spaces sequences of letters or characters.
These separations do not always correspond to
functional realities.
 In speech these pauses do not exist. Speech is a
phonetic continuum and breaks are done only between
some larger syntactic units, such as phrases or clauses.
E.g. School, household, in, fall out, waste paper basket,
forget-me-not, runner-up.
Value of these spaces?
Consequently, a definition based on writing traditions
alone cannot be entirely satisfactory.
Second definition
 The second type of definition considers the indivisible unit of
thought as the most essential criterion. The main problem
faced by this view is the delimitation which offers us three
possible alternatives:
 A) the word as represented in writing represents a thought
unit or a psychological unit, e.g. table, house, courage, faith,
intelligence, tall, short, sleep, eat…
 B) The word forms one block but includes two units of
thought: e.g. farmer, rethink, spoonful.
 C) The psychological unit exceeds the limit of the
graphological unit and spreads over several words, which is
then a more complex unit: e.g. all of a sudden, as usual,
coconut.
Third definition
 By L. Bloomfield, who suggested a formal definition of word.
He contrasted it with other significant units, the morpheme
or minimal meaningful unit, and the syntagma or structure,
consisting potentially of more than one word.

 For Bloomfield, a minimal form is morpheme. A form which


may occur alone is free, and the one which cannot occur
alone is bound: F book, man ; B -ing, -er.

 Word is a minimal free form, which can occur in isolation


and have meaning but which cannot be analysed into
elements which can all occur alone and also have meaning.
Working definition
The word is an uninterruptible unit of structure consisting
of one or more morphemes and which typically occurs in
the structure of phrases.

 The morphemes are the ultimate grammatical


constituents, the minimal meaningful units of language.
Word
 Another difficulty when treating words is the term word
itself, which may be used in a number of different ways:
1. It may refer to the word form, the physical unit or concrete
realisation, either the orthographical word (the written
form) or the phonological word (the uttered or transcribed
form).
2. It may refer to the lexeme, which is rather like a dictionary
entry. A lexeme includes all inflected formes of a word. It is
an abstraction and is indicated by small capitals:
e.g. WALK – walk, walks, walked, walking
RUN – run, runs, ran, running
SING – sing, sings, sang, sung, singing.
Lexeme
 Since the lexeme is abstract, it is conventional to choose one
of the inflected forms to represent it, such as infinitive of the
verb or the singular of the noun. The same word form may in
fact represent different lexemes:
 a. A homonym is a single orthographic and phonological
word standing for two lexemes, as bear is either the verb or
the noun.
 b. A homograph is a single orthographic word (but separate
phonological words) standing for two lexemes, as lead is
either the noun /lεd/ or the verb /li:d/.
 c. A homophone is a single phonological word (but separate
orthographical words) standing for two lexemes, as /mi:t/ is
either the noun meat or the verb meet.
Lexeme
 The same lexeme might also have quite distinct word forms,
as in the case of the definite article the, represented by /ð/
or /ð/, or the indefinite article a/an, represented by /e/,
//, /n/, or /n/.
3. Finally, word may also refer to a morphosyntactic word (or
grammatical word). A morphosyntactic word consists of a
lexeme and associated grammatical meaning. For example,
in:
I take the garbage out every week. (TAKE + present)
I took the garbage out yesterday. (TAKE + past)
I have taken the garbage out already. (TAKE + past participle)
Word-form
the different morphosyntactic words are represented by
different word forms (take, took, taken).
But in
 I put the garbage out every week. (PUT + present)
 I put the garbage out yesterday. (PUT + past)
 I have put the garbage out already. (PUT + past participle)

the different morphosyntactic words are represented by the


same word form (put).
Lexical words

 We shall now come back to the distinction often made


between lexical (content), function words and inserts.
 In most general terms, lexical words are nouns, verbs,
adjectives, and adverbs. They have fairly independent
meanings and may be meaningful even in isolation or in
a series. They are the main carriers of meaning in a
text.
 For example, bottle has an independent meaning; and
so does the series boy, break, bottle, stone.
 They are the words that remain in the information-
dense language of telegrams, lecture notes, headlines,
etc.
Function words
 The English vocabulary has thousands of lexical words, and new
items can always be added to the list.
 Function words bind the text together. They often have a wide
range of meanings and serve two main roles: indicating
relationships between lexical words or larger units, or indicating
the way in which a lexical word or larger unit is to be interpreted.
 Function words are elements like prepositions,
determiners,pronouns, numerals, auxiliaries, adverbial particles,
coordinators, subordinators, wh-words, the negator not,
existential there, the infinitive marker to...
 Such classes contain relatively few members and the addition of
new members is rather rare. They constitute closed classes or
closed sets.
 However, although prepositions may be classed as
grammatical/function words, they are not completely
empty of semantic content.
 The sentence «The book is on the table» has quite a
different meaning when on is replaced by under, near,
off, etc.
 Similarly, the co-ordinators and, or, and but are not
mutually interchangeable, because they are not
synonymous.
Inserts
 Inserts are a relatively newly recognized category of word. They do
not form an integral part of a syntactic structure, but are inserted
rather freely in the text.
 They are often marked off by intonation, pauses, or by punctuation
marks in writing.
 They characteristically carry emotional and interactional meanings
and are especially frequent in spoken texts.
E.g. Hm hm, very good. (CONV)

Cheers man. (CONV)

Yeah, I will. Bye. (CONV)

Biber et al. (1999)


Multiple class membership
 Word classes have fuzzy borderlines:
Homonymy – a single form belongs to more than one word class.
E.g. right – can be a lexical word (noun, verb, adjective, or adverb), or
a function word (preposition or subordinator).
A number of forms can belong to more than one function word class,
e.g. To (preposition and infinitive marker), for (preposition and
subordinator), etc.
Other examples:
Before – adverb, preposition, subordinator
Round – Noun, verb, adjective, adverb, preposition
Weekly – noun, adjective, adverb
Early – adjective, adverb
(Biber et al. 1999)
Characteristics of words
 First, the word is an uninterruptible unit.
When elements are added to a word to modify its
meaning, they are never included within that word.
They respect the internal stability of the word and are
added either at the beginning as prefixes of the word or
at the end as suffixes.
For example, the prefix un- and the suffix –able may be
added to the words aware and drink and give unaware
and drinkable respectively.
 Note, however, that an affix may also occur not at the
beginning or at the end, but sumultaneously with the
word; we then speak of a suprafix.
 Compare for example the words 'export (noun) and
ex'port (verb); they differ only in the position of the
primary stress represented by the symbol (').
 The stress pattern may be referred to as a suprafix. The
word to which affixes are added and which carries the
basic meaning of the resulting complex word is known
as 'the stem',which may consist of one or more
morphemes. The label 'root' is used to refer to a stem
consisting of a single morpheme.
 Secondly, the word may consist of one or more
morphemes.
 When it consists of one morpheme only, then it cannot
be broken down into smaller meaningful units, e.g. dog,
hand, man, out, work.
 These are called 'simple' words, which are typically
'minimum free forms', in the sense that they may stand
by themselves and yet act as minimally complete
utterances, e.g. in answer to a question.
 When words consist of more than one morpheme, they
may be either complex or compound.
 Complex words may be broken down into one free form
and one or more bound forms: e.g. dog-s, happi-ly,
quick-er, work-ing, whereas compound words consist of
more than one free form: e.g. birth+day, black+bird,
candle+stick, coat+hanger.
 We also need to mention cases which incorporate the
characteristics of both complex and compound words:
e.g. gentle-man-ly consists of the compound word
gentle+man and the suffix -ly; wind+shield+wipe-er
consists of the compound word wind+shield and the
complex word wip-er.
 Finally, it is also an important characteristic of each
word that it should belong to a specific word class or
part of speech.
 Where the same form appears in more than one class,
as frequently happens in English, we regard the various
occurences as separate words (for example, smoke
(verb) as distinct from smoke (noun)).
 It may even be suggested that a word is defined by two
factors: its semantic 'nucleus' and the class to which it
belongs.

You might also like