Compensation and Its Impact On Motivation Employee S Satisfaction and Employee S Performance

International Academic
International Academic Institute Journal of

for Science and Technology Organizational Behavior
and
International Academic Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource
Human Resource Management
Vol. 5, No. 4, 2018, pp. 1-43. Management
ISSN 2454-2210 www.iaiest.com
Compensation and Its Impact on Motivation Employee‟s

Satisfaction and Employee‟s Performance
Prof. Aabha S Singhvi, Nilesh N Dhage, Pradeep P Sharma
Gidc Rajju Shroff Rofel Institute of Management Studies, Vapi-Gujarat.
Abstract
Human capital is the pivotal of organisational effectiveness and the most valuable asset
available to an organisation is its people. The high absenteeism of employees and the lack of a
sense of justice to the provision of compensation to employees is a factor that indicates th e
cause of the declining motivation to work on employees that can result in the decrease of
employee performance. The study aims to determine the effect of job motivation, compensation,
and employee‟s satisfaction and performance. This model includes four factors; Payment
Justice, Organizational designed procedures, supervisor and performance -based pay. Also
Herzberg and Kitchener model has been used to measure employees‟ motivation. The present
study examined the influence of compensation, Motivation, Employees satisfaction. I have used the
quantitative technique correlation, regression. Compensation has significant relationship with Motivation,
Employees satisfaction, and Employee performance Lack of Employees satisfaction on job can lead or
restrict the employee‟s performance. Motivation has positive impact on employee performance which is
proven by survey in BANSWARA and through regression method. There are many factors which
motivate the employee‟s to perform; compensation can help to increase motivation, motivation help to
increase job satisfaction and job satisfaction can help to increase employee performance. To conclude,
Compensation is vast topic and differs for every employee, so every compensation pay satisfy each
employee differently. Motivation is also depend on human behaviour and many other factors which is not
consider in this study. Firm should also focus on different factors to increase employee performance.
Keywords: Compensation, Motivation, Employee Satisfaction, Employee Performance
1
International Academic Journal of Organizational Behavior and Human Resource management,
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
1 Introduction
1.1 Compensation
According to Gary Dessler, “Employee compensation refers to all forms of pay going to employees and
arising from their employment.” The phrase „all forms of pay‟ in the definition does not include non-
financial benefits, but all the direct and indirect financial compensations”.
According to Thomas J. Bergmann, Compensation consists of four distinct components: Compensation
= Wage or Salary + Employee benefits +Non-recurring financial rewards+ Non-pecuniary rewards.
The Concept of Compensation
 Compensation refers to a wide range of financial and non-financial rewards to employees for their
services rendered to the organization. It is paid in the form of wages, salaries and employee benefits such
as paid vacations, insurance maternity leave, free travel facility, retirement benefits etc., Monetary
payments are a direct form of compensating the employees and have a great impact in motivating
employees.
 The system of compensation should be so designed that it achieves the following objectives.
 The capable employees are attracted towards the organization
 The employees are motivated for better performance
 The employees do not leave the employer frequently
1.2 Motivation
According to Webster’s, A motive is something (a need or desire) that cause a person to act. Motivate in
turn means to provide with the motive and motivation is defined as “the act of process of motivating”.
Motivation is the act or process of providing a motive that cause a person to take some action.
1.2.1 Types of Motivation
There are two types of motivation, Intrinsic and Extrinsic motivation.
Intrinsic Motivation
Intrinsic motivation means that the individual's motivational stimuli are coming from within. The
individual has the desire to perform a specific task, because its results are in accordance with his belief
system or fulfils a desire and therefore importance is attached to it.
Extrinsic Motivation
Extrinsic motivation means that the individual's motivational stimuli are coming from outside. In other
words, our desires to perform a task are controlled by an outside source. Note that even though the stimuli
are coming from outside, the result of performing the task will still be rewarding for the individual
performing the task.
Herzberg’s Motivation- Hygiene Theory

The two-factor theory also known as Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory and dual-factor theory) states
that there are certain factors in the workplace that cause job satisfaction, while a separate set of factors
cause dissatisfaction.
Two- Factor Theory

Motivators (e.g. challenging work, recognition for one's achievement, responsibility, opportunity to do
something meaningful, involvement in decision making, and sense of importance to an organization) that
2
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
gives positive satisfaction, arising from intrinsic conditions of the job itself, such as recognition,
achievement, or personal growth.
Hygiene factors (e.g. status, job security, salary, fringe benefits, work conditions, good pay, paid
insurance, vacations) that do not give positive satisfaction or lead to higher motivation, though
dissatisfaction results from their absence. The term "hygiene" is used in the sense that these are
maintenance factors. These are extrinsic to the work itself, and include aspects such as company policies,
supervisory practices, or wages/salary Herzberg often referred to hygiene factors as "KITA" factors,
which is an acronym for "kick in the ass", the process of providing incentives or threat of punishment to
make someone do something.
Table No.1 Motivators and Hygiene Factors
Motivators (Intrinsic) Hygiene factors (Extrinsic)
Recognition Job context
Work itself Salary
Opportunity for advancement Personal Life
Professional Growth Work conditions
Responsibility Good relation with co-workers
Good feelings about organization Effective supervisor
Job content Job security
1.3 Job Satisfaction

According to E.A. Locke, Job satisfaction is as a pleasurable or positive emotional state resulting from
the appraisal of one‟s job or job experience.
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Theory

One theory of human motivation that has received a great deal of exposure in the past was developed by
Abraham Maslow. Until the more basic needs are adequately fulfilled, a person will not strive to meet
higher needs.
In this theory Maslow classified human needs into five categories that ascend in a definite order as
follows:
1) Physiological needs
2) Safety and security needs
3) Belonging and love needs
4) Esteem needs
As assumption often made by those using Maslow‟s hierarchy is that workers in modern, technologically
advanced societies basically have satisfied their physiological, safety and belonging needs. Therefore they
will be motivated by the needs for self-esteem, esteem of others, and then self-actualization.
Consequently, conditions to satisfy these needs should be present at work; the job itself should be
meaningful and motivating.
3
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Figure 1: Maslow’s Hierarchy

1.4 Employees Performance
According to Goffman ,Performance refer to all activity of an individual which occurs during a period
marked by the continuous presence before a particular set of observers and which has some Influence on
the observers.
1.5 Influence on Employees Performance
Performance is affected by the following factors:-

Factors Performance
Personal Factors The individual skills, competence, motivation, job satisfaction and
commitment.
Leadership Factors The quality of encouragement, Guidance and support provide by managers
and team.
Team Factors The quality of support provided by colleagues.
Systems Factors The system work and facilities provided by the organization.
Situational Factors Internal and External environmental pressures and changes.
2 Literature Review
Sr. Author Name Year Title Method
No.
1 AbdifitahHashiNur, 2017 Employee Job Satisfaction And Correlation
AbdulkadirMohamudDahi Organizational Performance: Coefficient,
e, AshoAbukar Osman Empirical Study From Higher Regression
4
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Education Centers In Analysis.

Mogadishu-Somalia
Findings This research paper had three main objectives which are -To determine the relationship
between reward and organizational performance at higher education centres in Mogadishu. To
examine the relationship between autonomy and organizational performance at higher
education centres in Mogadishu, Somalia.
2 Ayesha 2017 Impact Of Compensation And ANOVA
Aslam,AmnaGhaffar,Tahle Reward System On The
elTalha,HinaMushtaq Performance Of An
Organization
Findings This study will indicate some of the factors which contribute to an employee performance like
reward and benefits, compensation, incentives and salary. In this paper researcher have targeted
banking sector of Faisalabad. This paper will also find out the relation of all these factors with
employee performance. The test used for analysis is SPSS.
3 Daniel NjoyawaaNdungu 2017 The Effects of Rewards and Correlations,
Recognition on Employee Regression
Performance in Public
Educational Institutions: A Case
of Kenyatta University, Kenya
Findings This study was conducted to determine the effects of reward and recognition on employee job
performance in Kenyatta University. Moreover, the relationship between other factors affecting
performance and performance was also explored with the help of responses collected from
employees working in Kenyatta University main campus, Nairobi. Stratified random sampling
and purposive random sampling were used in sampling design.
4 IshakAwaludin, La Ode 2016 The Effect of Job Satisfaction, Multiple
Bahana Adam, Sri Integrity and Motivation on Regression
WiyatiMahrani Performance Analysis
Findings The results of this study showed that ; simultaneously, job satisfaction, Integrity and motivation
of health workers has significant effect on performance of health workers, job satisfaction
have positive and significant impact on the performance of health workers in the government
Hospital in the City of Kendari.
5 Md. Nurun Nabi1, Md. 2017 Impact of Motivation on Descriptive
Monirul Islam2, Employee Performances: A Analysis
TanvirMahady Dip3, and Case Study of Karmasangsthan
Md. Abdullah Al Hossain3 Bank Limited, Bangladesh
Findings The study is a self-conducted research on how motivational tools impact the performance of
employee for betterment. The study also focused on de-motivation factors affecting employee
performance negatively. The data were analysed using descriptive statistical analysis methods.
2.1 Factors of Literature Review

Sr Author Name Title Year Factors
No.
5
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
1 Employee Job Satisfaction AbdifitahHashiNur, 2017 Reward, autonomy, social benefit,

And Organizational positive emotions, work place.
Performance: Empirical AbdulkadirMohamudD
Study From Higher ahie,
Education Centers In AshoAbukar Osman
Mogadishu-Somalia
2 Impact Of Compensation Ayesha 2017 Motivation, Incentives, efficiency of

And Reward System On The Aslam,AmnaGhaffar,T employees, effort.
Performance Of An ahleelTalha,HinaMusht
Organization aq
3 The Effects of Rewards and Daniel NjoyaNdungu 2017 Attitudes, productivity, recognition,
Recognition on Employee motivation, working environment and
Performance in Public leadership styles, Job security,
Educational Institutions: A Supervision.
Case of Kenyatta
University, Kenya
4 The Effect of Job IshakAwaludin, La 2016 Knowledge, awareness, Value,
Satisfaction, Integrity and Ode Bahana Adam, Sri performance appraisals, Job design.
Motivation on Performance WiyatiMahrani
5 Impact of Motivation on Md. Nurun Nabi1, Md. 2017 Employee Engagement; Decision
Employee Performances: A Monirul Islam2, making; Motivation; Productivity;
Case Study of TanvirMahady Dip3, Organizational goals; Job satisfaction,
Karmasangsthan Bank and Md. Abdullah Al organizational effectiveness.
Limited, Bangladesh Hossain3
3. Methodology
3.1 Problem Statement
Compensation, motivation, employee satisfaction and employee performance this factors are affecting
each other.
Now a day‟s compensation is an essential tool to motivate employees whether in monetary or non-
monetary terms, an increased motivation will satisfy employee more and satisfaction level of employees
increase the productivity or performance level of employee.
So problem of the study is how this factor is affecting each other and how this factors is taken as a
weapon to create variation in other variable when Compensation is remain independent variable.
3.2 Research Objectives & Hypothesis
When the Compensation is Independent Variable
Dependent variable Independent variable

Motivation Compensation
Employee satisfaction
Employee performance
6
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Model 1: For Motivation

Objective Null Hypothesis Alternative Hypothesis
1. To study the association H0: There is no significant H1: There is significant
between Compensation and association between association between
employees Motivation. Compensation and employees Compensation and employees
Motivation. Motivation.
2. To study the significant H0: There is no significant H1: There is significant impact
impact of Compensation on impact of Compensation on of Compensation on employees
employees Motivation. employees Motivation. Motivation.
Model 2: For Employees Satisfaction

To study the association H0: There is no significant H1: There is significant
employees Satisfaction. Compensation and employees Compensation and employees
Satisfaction. Satisfaction.
To study the significant impact H0: There is no significant H1: There is significant impact
of Compensation on employees impact of Compensation on of Compensation on employees
Satisfaction. employees Satisfaction. Satisfaction.
Model 3: For Employees Performance

employees performance. Compensation and employees Compensation and employees
performance. performance.
of Compensation on employees impact of Compensation on of Compensation on employee‟s
performance. employee‟s performance. performance.
When the Motivation is Independent Variable

Employee satisfaction Motivation
Employee performance

between Motivation and association between Motivation association between Motivation
7
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
employees Satisfaction. and employees Satisfaction. and employees Satisfaction.
of Motivation on employees impact of Motivation on of Motivation on employees
Satisfaction. employees Satisfaction. Satisfaction.

between Motivation and association between Motivation association between Motivation
employees Performance. and employees Performance. and employees Performance.
of Motivation on employees impact of Motivation on of Motivation on employees
Performance. employees Performance. Performance.
When the Employees Satisfaction is Independent Variable

Employee performance Employee satisfaction

To study the association H0: There is no significant H1: H0: There is significant
between employees Satisfaction association between employees association between employees
and employees performance. Satisfaction and Employees Satisfaction and Employees
Performance. Performance.
of employees Satisfaction on impact of employees Satisfaction of employees Satisfaction on
employees performance. on employees Performance. employees Performance..
3.3 Research Objectives & Indirect Hypothesis

 When the Independent Variable is Compensation
Model 1: For Employees Satisfaction through Motivation

Objective Independent Dependent Intervening Null Alternative
Hypothesis Hypothesis
To study the compensation employee motivation H0: There is no H1: There is
significant satisfaction significant significant
impact of impact of impact of
compensation Compensation Compensation
on employee on employees on employees
8
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
satisfaction Satisfaction Satisfaction

through through through
motivation motivation. motivation.
Model 2: For Employees Performance through Motivation

To study the Compensation employee Motivation H0: There is no H1: There is
significant performance significant significant impact
impact of impact of of compensation on
compensation compensation employee
on employee on employee performance
performance performance through motivation
through through
motivation motivation
Model 3: For Employees Performance through Employees Satisfaction

To study the compensation employee employees H0: there is no H1: there is
significant performance satisfaction significant significant
compensation compensation compensation
on employee on employee on employee
performance performance performance
employees employee‟s employee‟s
satisfaction. satisfaction. satisfaction.
Model 4: For Employees Performance through Motivation and Employees Satisfaction

To study the compensation employee Motivation, H0: there is no H1: there is
significant performance Employees significant significant
impact of satisfaction impact of impact of
compensation compensation compensation
on employee on employee on employee
motivation and motivation and motivation
employees employee‟s and
satisfaction. satisfaction. employee‟s
satisfaction.
 When the Independent Variable is Motivation
9
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.

To study the Motivation employee employees H0: there is no H1: there is
significant performance satisfaction significant significant
Motivation on Motivation on Motivation on
employee employee employee
employees employee‟s employee‟s
satisfaction. satisfaction. satisfaction.
3.4 Research Type

Particulars Available tools Used tools
Research design Exploratory/causal/Descriptive Descriptive Study
Data collection method Primary/secondary Primary & secondary data
Tool for data collection Interviews//Observations/case Questionnaire and survey
study/Documents /Questionnaire and survey
Scale Thurston scale/semantic/likert Five point Likert Scale
Population 1146 1146

Sample size 243 243
Sampling technique Probability / Non probability Non- Probability
(Convenience)
Number of question 41 41
4. Data Analysis & Interpretation

Model.1 Correlation Analysis between Dependent Variable and Independent Variable
Table 2: Correlation Analysis between Dependent Variable and Independent Variable
Correlations
Compensation Motivation Employee Employee

Satisfaction Performance
Pearson 1 .810** .864** .867**

Correlation
Compensation
Sig. (1- .000 .000 .000
tailed)
N 243 243 243 243
10
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Motivation Pearson .810** 1 .880** .898**

Correlation
Sig. (1- .000 .000 .000
tailed)
N 243 243 243 243
Employee Pearson .864** .880** 1 .919**

Satisfaction Correlation
Sig. (1- .000 .000 .000
tailed)
N 243 243 243 243
Employee Pearson .867** .898** .919** 1

Performance Correlation
Sig. (1- .000 .000 .000
tailed)
N 243 243 243 243
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).
Interpretation:
There is Strong relationship between Motivation and Compensation (.810)
There is Strong relationship between Employee Satisfaction and Compensation (.864)
There is Strong relationship between Employee Performance and Compensation
(.867).
Model 2 Correlation Analysis between Motivation, Employee Satisfaction and Employee Performance
Table 3: Correlation Analysis between Motivation, Employee Satisfaction and Employee

Performance
Correlations
Motivation Employee Employee

satisfaction Performance
11
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Motivation Pearson .880** .898**

Correlation
1
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 243 243 243
Employee Pearson .880** .919**

satisfaction Correlation
1
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 243 243 243
Employee Pearson .898** .919**

1
Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000
N 243 243 243
Interpretation:
There is Strong relationship between Employee Satisfaction and Motivation (.880)
There is Strong relationship between Employee Performance and Motivation (.898)
Model.3 Correlation Analysis Between, Employee Satisfaction and Employee Performance
Table 4: Correlation Analysis Between, Employee Satisfaction and Employee Performance
Correlations
Employee Employee Performance

satisfaction
Employee satisfaction Pearson 1 .919**

Correlation
Sig. (1-tailed) .000
12
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
N 243 243
Employee Pearson .919** 1

Sig. (1-tailed) .000
N 243 243
Interpretation:
There is Strong relationship between Employee Performance and Employee Satisfaction (.919)
When the Compensation Is Independent Variable
Table 5: Model Summary for Motivation

Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted Std. Error of the

Estimate
R Square
1 .810a .656 .655 6.63035
a. Predictors: (Constant), Compensation
Interpretation:
The model summary provide correlation coefficient R = 0.810 and coefficient of determination R
Square=0.656 for the regression model. Adjusted R square 0.655suggest that there is 65.5% variability in
Compensation to Motivation.
Table 6: Anova for Motivation

ANOVA
Model Sum of df Mean Square F Sig.

Squares
1 Regression 20244.552 1 20244.552 460.506 .000b
13
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Residual 10594.740 241 43.962
Total 30839.292 242
a. Dependent Variable: Motivation
b. Predictors: (Constant), Compensation
Interpretation:
ANOVA table tell us whether a regression model explains a statistical significant proportion of the
variance. It compare how well are linear regression model predicts the outcome. Here in ANOVA the
significant value is 0.005 which is less than 0.000 so we can say that the model can have an accurate
prediction.
Table 7: Coefficients for Motivation

Coefficients
Model Unstandardized Standardized t Sig.
Coefficients Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) -7.975 2.221 -3.590 .000
Compensation 1.254 .058 .810 21.459 .000
a. Dependent Variable: Motivation
Interpretation:
REGRESSION MODEL:
y = α+βx (Where,
y = dependent variable, α = constant,
β = value in regression analysis, x = independent variable
y = α+βx
Y = -7.975 +1.254
Table 8: Model Summary for Employees Satisfaction
14
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Std. Error of
Square the Estimate
1 .864a .746 .745 4.84116
Interpretation:
Compensation to Employee satisfaction.
Table 9: Anova for Employees Satisfaction

ANOVA
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 16590.876 1 16590.876 707.899 .000b
Residual 5648.268 241 23.437
Total 22239.144 242
a. Dependent Variable: Employee satisfaction
Interpretation:
prediction.
Table 10: Coefficients for Employees Satisfaction
Coefficients
Model Unstandardized Standardize d Coefficients t Sig.

Coefficients
15
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) -6.618 1.622 -4.080 .000
Compensation 1.135 .043 .864 26.606 .000
Interpretation:
REGRESSION MODEL:
y = α+βx (Where,
y = α+βx
Y = -6.618 +1.135
Table 11: Model Summary for Employees Performance

Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the

Estimate
1 .867a .752 .751 4.95246
Interpretation:
Compensation to Employee Performance.
Table 12: Anova for Employees Performance
ANOVA
1 Regression 17881.022 1 17881.022 729.0 .000
16
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
b
38
Residual 5910.978 241 24.527
Total 23792.000 242
a. Dependent Variable: Employee Performance
Interpretation:
prediction.
Table 13: Coefficients for Employees Performance

Coefficients

Coefficients
Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) -5.637 1.659 -3.397 .001
Compensation 1.178 .044 .867 27.001 .000
Interpretation:
REGRESSION MODEL:
y = α+βx (Where,
y = α+βx
Y = -5.636 + 1,178
 When the Motivation is Independent Variable
17
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.

Table 14: Model Summary for Employee Satisfaction
Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
1 .880a .775 .774 4.55930
a. Predictors: (Constant), Motivation
Interpretation:
Motivation to Employee Satisfaction.
Table 15: Anova for Employee Satisfaction

ANOVA
Model Sum of Df Mean Square F Sig.
Squares
1 Regression 17229.426 1 17229.426 828.847 .000b
Residual 5009.718 241 20.787
Total 22239.144 242
b. Predictors: (Constant), Motivation
Interpretation:
prediction.
18
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Table 16: Coefficients for Employee Satisfaction

Coefficients
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) 6.727 1.049 6.412 .000
Motivation .747 .026 .880 28.790 .000
Interpretation:
REGRESSION MODEL:
y = α+βx (Where,
y = α+βx
Y = 6.727 + 0.747.
Table 17: Model Summary for Employee Performance
Model Summary
1 .898a .806 .805 4.37412
a. Predictors: (Constant), Motivation
Interpretation:
19
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Table 18: Anova for Employee Performance
ANOVA
1 Regression 19180.961 1 19180.961 1002.510 .000b
Residual 4611.039 241 19.133
Total 23792.000 242
b. Predictors: (Constant), Motivation
Interpretation:
prediction.
Table 19: Coefficients for Employee Performance

Coefficients
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized t Sig.

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) 7.725 1.007 7.675 .000
Motivation .789 .025 .898 31.662 .000
Interpretation:
REGRESSION MODEL:
y = α+βx (Where,
β = value in regression analysis, x = independent variable)
y = α+βx
20
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Y = 7.725 + 0.789
When the Employees Satisfaction is Independent Variable

Table 20: Model Summary for Employee Performance
Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of

the Estimate
1 .919a .845 .844 3.91522
a. Predictors: (Constant), Employee satisfaction
Interpretation:
Square=0.845 for the regression model. Adjusted R square 0.844 suggest that there is 84.4% variability in
Employee Satisfaction to Employee Performance.
Table 21: Anova for Employee Performance
ANOVA
1 Regression 20097.715 1 20097.715 1311.092 .000b
Residual 3694.285 241 15.329
Total 23792.000 242
b. Predictors: (Constant), Employee satisfaction
Interpretation:
21
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
prediction.
Table 22: Coefficients for Employee Performance

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) 4.361 .971 4.490 .000
Employee .951 .026 .919 36.209 .000
satisfaction
Interpretation:
REGRESSION MODEL:
y = α+βx (Where,
y = α+βx
Y = 4.361 + 0.951
Table 23: Model Summary for Employee Satisfaction through Motivation

Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the

Estimate
1 .917a .841 .839 3.84162
a. Predictors: (Constant), Motivation, Compensation
Interpretation:
Square=0.841for the regression model. Adjusted R square 0.839 suggest that there is 83.9% variability in
22
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Employee satisfaction to Motivation, Compensation.
Table 24: Anova for Employee Satisfaction through Motivation
ANOVA

Squares
1 Regression 18697.217 2 9348.609 633.459 .000b
Residual 3541.927 240 14.758
Total 22239.144 242
b. Predictors: (Constant), Motivation, Compensation
Interpretation:
prediction.
Table 25: Coefficients for Employee Satisfaction through Motivation
Coefficients
Model Unstandardized Standardized Coefficients T Sig.

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) -3.062 1.321 -2.318 .021
Compensation .576 .058 .438 9.973 .000
Motivation .446 .037 .525 11.947 .000
Interpretation:
REGRESSION MODEL:
y = α+βx (Where,
23
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.

y = α+βx
Y = -3.062 + 1,022
Table 26: Model Summary for Employee Performance through Motivation
Model Summary
1 .929a .863 .862 3.68807
a. Predictors: (Constant), Motivation, Compensation
Interpretation:
Table 27: Anova for Employee Performance through Motivation
ANOVA
Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
1 Regression 20527.550 2 10263.775 754.585 .000b
Residual 3264.450 240 13.602
Total 23792.000 242
b. Predictors: (Constant), Motivation, Compensation
Interpretation:
prediction.
Table 28: Coefficients for Employee Performance through Motivation
24
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Coefficients
Model Unstandardized Standardized T Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) -1.651 1.268 -1.302 .194
Compensatio .552 .055 .406 9.950 .000

n
Motivation .500 .036 .569 13.949 .000
Interpretation:
REGRESSION MODEL:
y = α+βx (Where,
y = α+βx
Y = -1.651 +1.052
25
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Table 29: Model Summary for Employee Performance through Satisfaction

Model Summary
1 .930a .866 .865 3.64803
a. Predictors: (Constant), Employee satisfaction, Compensation
Interpretation:
Table 30: Anova for Employee Performance through Satisfaction
ANOVA
Model Sum of df Mean Square F Sig.

Squares
1 Regression 20598.048 2 10299.024 773.889 .000b
Residual 3193.952 240 13.308
Total 23792.000 242
b. Predictors: (Constant), Employee satisfaction, Compensation
Interpretation:
prediction.
26
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Table 31: Coefficients for Employee Performance through Satisfaction

Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) -1.047 1.264 -.829 .408
Compensation .391 .064 .288 6.132 .000
Employee .694 .049 .671 14.289 .000
Satisfaction
Interpretation:
REGRESSION MODEL:
y = α+βx (Where,
y = α+βx
Y = -1.047 + 1.085

Table 32: Model Summary for Employee Performance through Motivation and Employee
Satisfaction
Model Summary
1 .944a .892 .890 3.28590
a. Predictors: (Constant), Employee satisfaction, Compensation, Motivation
Interpretation:
27
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Table 33: Anova for Employee Performance through Motivation and Employee Satisfaction
ANOVA
Squares
1 Regression 21211.487 3 7070.496 654.850 .000b
Residual 2580.513 239 10.797
Total 23792.000 242
b. Predictors: (Constant), Employee satisfaction, Compensation, Motivation
Interpretation:
prediction.
Table 34: Coefficients for Employee Performance through Motivation and Employee Satisfaction
Coefficients

B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) -.305 1.142 -.267 .789
Compensation .299 .059 .220 5.082 .000
Motivation .304 .040 .346 7.538 .000
Employee .439 .055 .425 7.959 .000
28
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Satisfaction
Interpretation:
REGRESSION MODEL:
y = α+βx (Where,
y = α+βx
Y = -0.305 +1.087
When the Independent Variable is Motivation

Table 35: Model Summary for Employee Performance through Employee Satisfaction
Model Summary
1 .938a .880 .879 3.45168
a. Predictors: (Constant), Employee satisfaction, Motivation
Interpretation:
Table 36: Anova for Employee Performance through Employee Satisfaction

ANOVA
1 Regression 20932.611 2 10466.305 878.479 .000b
Residual 2859.389 240 11.914
Total 23792.000 242
29
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
b. Predictors: (Constant), Employee satisfaction, Motivation
Interpretation:
prediction.
Table 37: Coefficient for Employee Performance through Employee Satisfaction
Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
1 (Constant) 3.747 .859 4.360 .000
Motivation .347 .041 .395 8.371 .000
Employee .591 .049 .572 12.125 .000
Satisfaction
Interpretation:
REGRESSION MODEL:
y = α+βx (Where,
y = α+βx
Y = 3.747 + 0.938
5. Results for Correlation & Regression

5.1 Results for Correlation
When the Compensation is Independent Variable:-
30
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Objectives Ho H1 Test Significant Decision
Value
1. To study the association Rejected Accepted Correlation 0.810 The significant

between Compensation and level is 0.01%.so
employees Motivation correlation shows
that
Compensation
and employees
Motivation is
strongly
correlated.
2. To study the significant Rejected Accepted Regression 0.000 The significant

impact of Compensation value is
on employees
Motivation 0.000 which is
less than 0.5000
so Alternative
hypotheses is
accepted.
Value
1. To study the association Rejected Accepted Correlation 0.864 The significant

between Compensation and level is 0.01%.so
employees satisfaction correlation shows
that
Compensation
and employees
Motivation is
strongly
correlated.
31
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
2. To study the significant Rejected Accepted Regression 0.000 The significant

impact of Compensation value is
on employees
satisfaction 0.000 Which is
less than 0.5000
so Alternative
hypotheses is
accepted.
Value
1. To study the association Rejected Accepted Correlation 0.864 The significant level is
between Compensation and 0.01%.so correlation shows
employees that Compensation and
employees Motivation is
Performance strongly correlated.
2. To study the significant Rejected Accepted Regression 0.000 The significant value is
impact of Compensation 0.000 which is less than
on employees 0.5000 so Alternative
performance. hypotheses is accepted.
When the Motivation is Independent Variable
Value
1. To study the association Rejected Accepted Correlation 0.880 The significant level is
between Compensation and 0.01%.so correlation
employees satisfaction shows that
Compensation and
employees Motivation is
strongly correlated.
32
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
2. To study the significant Rejected Accepted Regression 0.000 The significant value is
impact of Compensation on 0.000 which is less than
employees satisfaction 0.5000 so Alternative
hypotheses is accepted.
Value
1. To study the association Rejected Accepted Correlation 0.898 The significant level
between Compensation and is 0.01%.so
employees correlation shows that
Compensation and
Performance employees
Motivation is
strongly correlated.
2. To study the significant Rejected Accepted Regression 0.000 The significant value
impact of Compensation on is 0.000 which is less
employees performance. than 0.5000 so
Alternative
hypotheses is
accepted.
Model.3 Correlation Analysis Between, Employee Satisfaction and Employee Performance
Value
To study the association Rejected Accepted Correlation 0.919 The significant level is
between Compensation 0.01%.so correlation
and employees shows that Compensation
and employees
Performance Motivation is strongly
correlated.
33
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
2. To study the Rejected Accepted Regression 0.000 The significant value is

significant impact of
Compensation on 0.000 Which is less than
employees performance. 0.5000 so Alternative
hypotheses is accepted.
5.2 Results for Regression
When the Independent Variable is Compensation

Value
1.To study the Rejected Accepted Regression 0.000 The significant value
significant impact of is 0.000 which is less

than 0.5000 so
compensation on Alternative
hypotheses is
employee satisfaction accepted.
through motivation
Value
significant impact of is 0.000 which is less than

0.5000 so Alternative
compensation on hypotheses is accepted.
employee performance
through motivation
34
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Value
significant impact of is 0.000 which is less

than 0.5000 so
compensation on Alternative hypotheses
is accepted.
through employees
satisfaction
35
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Value
significant impact of is 0.000 which is less than

compensation on hypotheses is accepted.
through motivation and
employees satisfaction
When the Independent Variable is Motivation


Value
1. To study the Rejected Accepted Regression 0.000 The significant value
significant impact of Is 0.000 which is less than

Motivation on hypotheses is accepted.
Employee
performance through
Employees
Satisfaction.
36
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
6. Conclusion
Compensation Motivation Employee Employee performance
satisfaction
(C) 0.810 0.864 0.867
(M) 0.880 0.898
(S) 0.919
 Employee satisfaction is highly correlated and has greater impact on employee performance. And in
this firm motivation is more required to satisfy the employee.
 The organization mainly focus on Compensation, Motivation, Employees satisfaction, And

Employees Performance which are main aspects to increase performance. this will help to gain
competitive advantage Due to as all this variable has significant impact as p < α. Which is as follows:
 Compensation (0.00 <0.05)
 Motivation (0.00 <0.05)
 Employees satisfaction (0.00 <0.05)
 Employees performance (0.00 <0.05).
References:
AbdifitahHashiNur, AbdulkadirMohamudDahie, AshoAbukar Osman, 2017,” Employee Job Satisfaction
and Organizational Performance: Empirical Study from Higher Education Centres In Mogadishu-
Somalia,” International Journal in Commerce, IT & Social Sciences (Impact Factor: 2.446), Vol.2 Issue-
11, ISSN: 2394-5702.
Ayesha Aslam,AmnaGhaffar,TahleelTalha,HinaMushtaq , 2017,” Impact Of Compensation And Reward
System On The Performance Of An Organization: An Empirical Study On Banking Sector Of Pakistan,”
European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 08, November 2015 P.P. 319 – 325,
ISSN: 2235 -767X.
Daniel NjoyaNdungu, 2017,” The Effects of Rewards and Recognition on Employee Performance in
Public Educational Institutions: A Case of Kenyatta University, Kenya,” Global Journal of Management
and Business Research: An Administration and Management Volume 17 Issue 1 Version 1.0 Type:
Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Inc. (USA)
Online ISSN: 2249-4588 & Print ISSN: 0975-5853.
IshakAwaludin, La Ode Bahana Adam, Sri WiyatiMahrani, 2016,” The Effect of Job Satisfaction,
Integrity and Motivation on Performance,” The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES),
Volume 5, Issue 1, ISSN (e): 2319 – 1813 ISSN (p): 2319 – 1805.
Md. NurunNabi, Md. Monirul Islam, TanvirMahady Dip, Md. Abdullah Al Hossain 2017,” Impact of
Motivation on Employee Performances: A Case Study of Karmasangsthan Bank Limited, Bangladesh,”
Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review.
Bibliography
37
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281610210_The_Impact_of_Intrinsic_Motivation_on_Employe
e's_Job_Satisfaction
www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/.../6110%2520rel%3D
http://www.ipedr.com/vol11/7-R00013.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anwar_Rasheed/publication/235644076_Impact_of_Rewards_and_
Motivation_on_Job_Satisfaction_in_Banking_Sector_of_Saudi_Arabia/links/02bfe5123d6b47248500000
0/Impact-of-Rewards-and-Motivation-on-Job-Satisfaction-in-Banking-Sector-of-Saudi-Arabia.pdf
http://www.ciitlahore.edu.pk/papers/540-8589018417370800808.pdf
http://www.theijes.com/papers/v5-i1/H0501047052.pdf
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1138941.pdf
http://www.ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_6_June_2013/26.pdf
https://www.journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/download/1320/1227
http://www.rajalakshmi.org/ijgbmr/downloads/IJGBMRMar14-Paper5.PDF
http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/The_Impact_of_Motivation_on_the_Employee_Performance_and_Job_
Satisfaction_in_IT_Park_(Software_House)_Sector_of_Peshawar,_Pakistan.pdf
www.ijsrr.org/down_150.php
https://basicresearchjournals.org/business/pdf/Rijalu%20et%20al.pdf
https://basicresearchjournals.org/business/pdf/Rijalu%20et%20al.pdf
https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijmsr/v2-i9/13.pdf
http://www.idpublications.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Full-Paper-THE-EFFECT-OF-
COMPENSATION-AND-WORK-MOTIVATION-ON-EMPLOYEE-PERFORMANCE.pdf
https://journalofbusiness.org/index.php/GJMBR/article/viewFile/2183/2085
https://www.textroad.com/pdf/JBASR/J.%20Basic.%20Appl.%20Sci.%20Res.,%202(5)4616-
4623,%202012.pdf
http://www.ejbss.com/Data/Sites/1/vol04no08november2015/ejbss-1657-15-
impactofcompensationandrewardsystem.pdf
https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/impact-of-motivation-on-employee-performances-a-case-
study-of-karmasangsthan-bank-limited-bangladesh-.pdf
http://www.journalijar.com/uploads/170_IJAR-8692.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1017.5709&rep=rep1&type=pdf
http://mujournal.mewaruniversity.in/JIR%201-4/13.pdf
http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijld/article/viewFile/6094/4951
https://www.ijires.org/administrator/components/com_jresearch/files/publications/IJIRES-205_final.pdf
http://pakacademicsearch.com/pdf-files/ech/517/166-171%20Vol%205,%20No%205%20(2013).pdf
http://wwwbiz.meijo-u.ac.jp/SEBM/ronso/no9_1/08_PUSHPAKUMARI.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abdulkadir_Dahie/publication/309715394_EMPLOYEE_JOB_SAT
ISFACTION_AND_ORGANIZATIONAL_PERFORMANCE_EMPIRICAL_STUDY_FROM_HIGHE
R_EDUCATION_CENTERS_IN_MOGADISHU-
SOMALIA/links/581deee508ae12715af5c7b8/EMPLOYEE-JOB-SATISFACTION-AND-
ORGANIZATIONAL-PERFORMANCE-EMPIRICAL-STUDY-FROM-HIGHER-EDUCATION-
CENTERS-IN-MOGADISHU-SOMALIA.pdf
www.ijsrr.org/down_150.php
38
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Annexure
A
QUESTIONNAIRE
ON
“Compensation and its impact on Motivation, Employee satisfaction and Employee’s Performance”
At
“Banswara Garments (A Unit of Banswara Syntax Ltd), DAMAN)”
Demographical questions for respondent:-

Age
18-24 years 25-34 years 35-44 years 45-54 years 55-64 years Above 65
old old old old old
Education
SSC HSC Diploma Graduation Master’s Others
degree
Gender
Male Female
Marital status
Single Married Widowed Divorced
Experience:-
Less than 1 1-5 years 6-10 years 11-15 years 16-20 years 20-25 years More
year than 25
39
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Occupation status:-
1. Compensation
Sr.
Strongly Strongly
Statement Agree Neutral Disagree
Agree disagree
No.
Employee compensation plan at

i. Banswara Garments is well 57 130 43 8 5
formulated?
The pay structure at Banswara

Garments ensures there is a good
ii. 45 147 47 4 0
balance of pays between the employees
in the company?
I feel I am adequately
iii. compensated for use of my skills in my 9 127 56 46 5
job?
MyJob offers little or no incentives

iv. 7 39 87 98 12
for gaining new skills or knowledge?
My basic pay motivates me to do my

v. 30 19 157 23 14
work well?
There exists a system in the company of

compensating employees if they achieve
vii. their 98 57 53 29 6
Targets?
Allowances are required to satisfy

viii. 96 66 51 22 8
employee‟s basic needs?
Benefits are a source of my job

ix. 101 77 45 15 5
Satisfaction?
40
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
Compensation system is well

x. 43 70 110 19 1
Structured in Banswara Garments?
2. Motivation
Sr.
Strongly Strongly
Variables Agree Neutral Disagree
No. Agree disagree
Promotion is given according to

i. 50 121 41 25 6
Your performance?
Organization do hard stuff to

ii. 75 80 80 1 7
Provide you a job security?
Does employer gives reward to

iii.
Employees who perform excellent job?
25 120 75 23 0
The benefits are so important to me

iv. they are one of the reasons I have not 76 80 80 2 5
moved from Banswara?
The benefits I receive motivates

v. 121 82 21 9 10
Me to do well at my work?
I am satisfied with the present

vi. 57 130 43 8 5
Motivation system?
Compensation is
t
vii. big tool 45 147 47 4 0
Motivate employee? o
I perform hard in team work to

viii. 9 127 56 46 5
Become candidate to receive
41
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
benefit?
I am satisfied with other benefits offered

ix. 179 47 14 3 0
by The Company?
Proper motivation gives me a job

x. 43 60 110 19 11
Satisfaction?
3. Employee satisfaction
Sr. Variables Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
No. Agree disagree
i. Salary is a component of my job 57 130 43 8 5
Satisfaction?
ii. Benefits are a source of my job 45 147 47 4 0
Satisfaction?
iii. Job security is a source of my job 7 39 87 98 12
Satisfaction?
iv. Job satisfaction inspires me to 50 121 41 25 6
Perform well?
v. Career development opportunities are a 75 80 80 1 7
source of my job
satisfaction?
vi. There is proper balance between
My salary and my work? 25 120 75 23 0
vii. You are Satisfied with your 80 75 80 1 7
Annual Raise in salaries?
viii. At high job satisfaction I can give 56 127 9 5 46
High effort?
ix. I found better result in 179 47 14 3 0
performance appraisal after
motivation?
x. Job satisfaction consider as tool 43 60 110 19 11
For improving performance?
4. Employee Performance
Sr. Variables Strongly Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly

No. Agree disagree
i. Compensation attracts employee 80 75 80 1 7
To perform hard work?
ii. Motivation creates effectiveness 56 127 9 5 46
In employee performance?
42
Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 1-43.
iii. Job satisfaction has direct impact 50 121 41 25 6

On employee performance?
iv. My company paid salary and emolument 75 80 80 1 7
that are sufficient to motivate employees
to perform
Effectively based on a lay down
procedure?
v. My salary is commensurate to the
Work I do? 25 120 75 23 0
vi. I am clear on the performance objectives 57 130 43 8 5
and standards for my
Function?
vii. During team work different 45 147 47 4 0
compensation level of members
Discourages me?
viii. Non-monetary benefit motivates 9 127 56 46 5
employee more than monetary
Benefit?
ix. Monetary benefit Satisfied employee 30 19 157 23 14
more than non-monetary benefit?
x. You improve your performance growth? 181 50 12 0 0
5. Which variable is most affect the employee performance?
Compensation Motivation Job satisfaction
43

Compensation and Its Impact On Motivation Employee S Satisfaction and Employee S Performance

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Compensation and Its Impact On Motivation Employee S Satisfaction and Employee S Performance

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Compensation and Its Impact On Motivation Employee S Satisfaction and Employee S Performance

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Academic

International Academic Institute Journal of

Compensation and Its Impact on Motivation Employee‟s

Prof. Aabha S Singhvi, Nilesh N Dhage, Pradeep P Sharma

Gidc Rajju Shroff Rofel Institute of Management Studies, Vapi-Gujarat.

Keywords: Compensation, Motivation, Employee Satisfaction, Employee Performance

Herzberg’s Motivation- Hygiene Theory

Two- Factor Theory

1.3 Job Satisfaction

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Theory

Figure 1: Maslow’s Hierarchy

1.5 Influence on Employees Performance

Performance is affected by the following factors:-

Education Centers In Analysis.

2.1 Factors of Literature Review

1 Employee Job Satisfaction AbdifitahHashiNur, 2017 Reward, autonomy, social benefit,

2 Impact Of Compensation Ayesha 2017 Motivation, Incentives, efficiency of

Dependent variable Independent variable

Model 1: For Motivation

Model 2: For Employees Satisfaction

Model 3: For Employees Performance

When the Motivation is Independent Variable

Dependent variable Independent variable

Model 1: For Employees Satisfaction

employees Satisfaction. and employees Satisfaction. and employees Satisfaction.

Model 2: For Employees Performance

When the Employees Satisfaction is Independent Variable

Dependent variable Independent variable

Model 1: For Employees Performance

3.3 Research Objectives & Indirect Hypothesis

Model 1: For Employees Satisfaction through Motivation

satisfaction Satisfaction Satisfaction

Model 2: For Employees Performance through Motivation

Model 3: For Employees Performance through Employees Satisfaction

Model 4: For Employees Performance through Motivation and Employees Satisfaction

 When the Independent Variable is Motivation

Model 1: For Employees Performance through Employees Satisfaction

3.4 Research Type

Population 1146 1146

4. Data Analysis & Interpretation

Compensation Motivation Employee Employee

Pearson 1 .810** .864** .867**

N 243 243 243 243

Motivation Pearson .810** 1 .880** .898**

Sig. (1- .000 .000 .000

N 243 243 243 243

Employee Pearson .864** .880** 1 .919**

Sig. (1- .000 .000 .000

N 243 243 243 243

Employee Pearson .867** .898** .919** 1

Sig. (1- .000 .000 .000

N 243 243 243 243

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (1-tailed).

Table 3: Correlation Analysis between Motivation, Employee Satisfaction and Employee

Motivation Employee Employee

Motivation Pearson .880** .898**

Sig. (1-tailed) .000 .000

N 243 243 243

Pearson 1 .810 .864 .867**

Motivation Pearson .810 1 .880 .898**

Employee Pearson .864 .880 1 .919**

Employee Pearson .867 .898 .919** 1

Motivation Pearson .880 .898

Employee Pearson .880 .919

Employee Pearson .898 .919