Lab Report 1
Lab Report 1
August Rothenberger
Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................
Propionic acid vapor was heated and the pressure recorded at regular intervals. The
dissociation constant for propionic acid vapor at standard conditions was calculated to be
7.62*10-6 ± 7.30*10-4 atm. The entropy of dissociation was calculated to be 699 J/K*mole and
compared to the theoretical Sackur-Tetrode translation entropy of 200 J/K*mole to find the
calculated value with 250% discrepancy. The discrepancy was attributed to an error in procedure
Introduction ....................................................................................................................................
In the gaseous phase, propionic acid can adopt either a dimer or monomer form due to
The rate constant of the above dissociation, KP, can be calculated by measuring how the system
pressure changes with temperature. Due to Avogadro’s gas law, a mole of monomer would
contain twice as many molecules and have double the pressure as a mole of dimer. KP can be
𝑃 2
( 𝑃𝑀0 )
𝐾𝑃 = ⁄𝑃𝐷 (1)
𝑃0
where PM and PD are the partial pressures of the monomer and dimer, respectively, and P0 is the
If a number α, between 0 and 1, represents the degree of dissociation of the dimer, PM and
𝑃𝑀 = (2𝛼⁄1 + 𝛼 )𝑃 (2)
𝑃𝑀 = (1 − 𝛼⁄1 + 𝛼 )𝑃 (3)
where the term in parentheses represents the mole fraction of monomers and dimers,
If the moles of dimer (nD), pressure (P), volume (V), and temperature (T) are known at
𝑛𝐷 (1 + 𝛼) = 𝑃𝑉⁄𝑅𝑇 (5)
𝑛𝐷 𝑅𝑇⁄
𝑃𝑖 = 𝑉 (6)
(1 + 𝛼) = 𝑃⁄𝑃 (7)
𝑖
If Equation 7 is substituted into Equation 4, the resultant simplified expression can be written:1
4(𝑃 − 𝑃𝑖 )
𝐾𝑃 = ⁄2𝑃 − 𝑃 (8)
𝑖
Standard thermodynamic quantities of free energy (ΔG°), enthalpy (ΔH°), and entropy
(∆𝐻° − ∆𝐺°)⁄
∆𝑆° = 𝑇 (11)
The theoretical method for predicting the translational component for entropy is defined by the
Sackur-Tetrode equation.
SM and SD are the entropy components of the monomer and dimer, respectively, and M is the
Experimental ..................................................................................................................................
A vessel of propionic acid was massed at 44.3236±0.0001 g. The vessel was connected to
an evacuated Schlenk line system so the propionic acid vapor would be transferred to a 3.4 L
bulb by diffusion until the system reached an equilibrium pressure of 2.43±0.005 torr. There was
no leak in the system. The bulb was then sealed and the propionic acid vessel again massed at
44.2666±0.0001g to determine the amount of acid vapor in the bulb. The temperature of the bulb
was increased at a constant rate of 1°C per 2 minutes and the pressure recorded every 1±0.1°C to
a precision of ±0.2% torr. Once the temperature reached 55°C, the temperature was more rapidly
The initial pressure can be calculated by Equation 6. However, no temperature value was
recorded when the propionic acid vapor was allowed to expand into the bulb. If the initial
This value does not make sense, since it is larger than the first recorded pressure in the bulb is
2.43 torr, or 0.00320 atm. Pi is the pressure if there is no dissociation, so it cannot be larger than
a measured data points where dissociation must occur. In all subsequent calculations, Pi will be
assumed to be 2.43 torr in order to construct data that obeys the correct kinetic and
thermodynamic trends.
To use the appropriate calculations, the pressure was converted to atmospheres (atm) and
1 2
∆𝑃𝑎𝑡𝑚 = √760 + 𝑃𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑟 2 (15)
𝑇𝐾 = 𝑇℃ + 273.15 (16)
Again, the rate constant for the dissociation of propionic acid is determined as:
4(𝑃 − 𝑃𝑖 )2⁄
𝐾𝑝 = 2𝑃𝑖 − 𝑃 (8)
The uncertainty for Kp will be determined in parts to simplify the calculation. First, the
𝑎 = (𝑃 − 𝑃𝑖 ) (18)
∆𝑏 = 2 ∗ 𝑏 ∗ ∆𝑎⁄𝑎 (21)
𝑐 = 2𝑃𝑖 − 𝑃 (22)
2 2
∆𝐾𝑝 = 𝐾𝑝 √∆𝑏 ⁄𝑏 2 + ∆𝑐 ⁄𝑐 2 (24)
2
√∆𝑃 2 +∆𝑃𝑖 2
⁄ 2
(2∗4(𝑃−𝑃𝑖 )2 ∗ (𝑃−𝑃𝑖 ))
√ (√22 ∗∆𝑃𝑖 2 +∆𝑃2 )
∆𝐾𝑝 = 𝐾𝑝 + (25)
(4(𝑃−𝑃𝑖 )2 )2 (2𝑃𝑖 −𝑃)2
Due to the large number of data points, all data tables for recorded and calculated values are
A plot can be constructed to obey Equation 10 by taking the natural logarithm of Kp and
-2
-4
y = -28572x + 84.046
-6 R² = 0.9733
Ln(Kp)
-8
-10
-12
-14
1/T (K^-1)
A linear regression is performed using the LINEST function in Excel with a 95% confidence
According to Equation 10, the negative slope of the curve is equal to the standard enthalpy ΔH°
Additionally, we are able to solve for KP at 25.0°C using the best-fit line for Figure 2.
1
𝐾𝑃 = 𝑒^(2.86 ∗ 104 ln(𝑎𝑡𝑚) 𝐾 ∗ 298.15 𝐾 + 84.0 ln(𝑎𝑡𝑚)) = 7.62 ∗ 10−6 𝑎𝑡𝑚
2
1
∆𝐾𝑃 = (7.62 ∗ 10 −6 ) √ 4 2
∗ (−2.86 ∗ 10 ) ∗ ( ) = 7.30 ∗ 10−4 𝑎𝑡𝑚
298.15
Equations 9 and 11 can be used to calculate ΔG° and ΔS° for each temperature. The
uncertainty calculations are provided below. Data tables are provided in supporting information
1 2 2
∆(∆𝑆°) = 𝑇 √(∆(∆𝐻°)) + (∆(∆𝐺°)) (27)
From literature,2 the thermodynamic values for standard enthalpy and entropy for
𝐽
∆𝑆° = 151 𝐾∗𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒
5 3
𝑆𝑀 = 𝑅 ∗ 2.303 [− log 𝑃 + 2 log 𝑇 + 2 log 74.08 − 0.5053]
5 3
𝑆𝐷 = 𝑅 ∗ 2.303 [− log 𝑃 + 2 log 𝑇 + 2 log 148.16 − 0.5053]
The results are included in Supporting Information, but the results were averaged to obtain the
𝐽 𝐽
|(200 − 699) 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒| = 499 𝐾∗𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒
This deviation can be attributed to the improper calculation of the initial pressure Pi used
in all calculations in the report. In order to properly calculate the thermodynamic quantities, the
initial temperature should have been taken when the propionic acid vapor was allowed to enter
the bulb under vacuum conditions. The initial pressure used for our calculations is larger than the
actual Pi value, which is why our value for standard entropy of reaction is much larger than the
theoretical value.
General Discussion
According to the results found in Table 3, KP increases with temperature. This agrees
with the expected result, since it requires energy to break the hydrogen bonds holding the dimer
bulb, leading to a larger equilibrium constant, which is defined as product concentration over
reactant concentration. Le Chatelier’s principle also applies since the reaction is endothermic,
and as the temperature of the system is increased, more product will be formed.
The standard dissociation enthalpy and entropy contribute to the free energy in different
ways. The enthalpy, ΔH°, is a measure of the heat required from the environment for the reaction
to progress, positive in our case since bonds are broken. Enthalpy is independent of temperature
since heat is a form of energy, the temperature is related to how quickly the heat flows from the
environment to the system. Entropy is the measure of disorder as the reaction progresses,
positive since the number of molecules increases. Entropy increases with temperature since
A typical hydrogen bond energy for an O-H---O system is about 21 kJ/mole.3 The
measured enthalpy of dissociation in our experiment was 237 kJ/mole. The dimer has two
hydrogen bonds, so the system would have an enthalpy of 42 kJ/mole, but this does not nearly
account for deviation of the calculated value. An explanation for the deviation of our procedure
Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................
The dissociation constant for propionic acid vapor at standard conditions was calculated
to be 7.62*10-6 ± 7.30*10-4 atm by heating the vapor at constant volume. Our calculations have a
discrepancy of 250% from the accepted values, attributed to improper proper calculation of the
Sample Calculations.......................................................................................................................
All sample calculations below are for the data point recorded at 27.0°C
1
𝑃𝑎𝑡𝑚 = 2.49 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑟 ∗ 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑟 = 3.28 ∗ 10−3 𝑎𝑡𝑚 (14)
760
𝑎𝑡𝑚
1 2
∆𝑃𝑎𝑡𝑚 = √760 + (2.49 ∗ .002)2 = 6.55 ∗ 10−6 𝑎𝑡𝑚 (15)
𝑎 = (3.28 ∗ 10−3 𝑎𝑡𝑚 − 3.20 ∗ 10−3 𝑎𝑡𝑚) = 7.89 ∗ 10−5 𝑎𝑡𝑚 (18)
−6
∆𝑏 = 2 ∗ 2.49 ∗ 10−9 ∗ 9.16 ∗ 10 ⁄7.89 ∗ 10−5 = 5.78 ∗ 10−9 𝑎𝑡𝑚2 (21)
𝑐 = 2 ∗ 3.20 ∗ 10−3 𝑎𝑡𝑚 − 3.28 ∗ 10−3 𝑎𝑡𝑚 = 3.12 ∗ 10−3 𝑎𝑡𝑚 (22)
∆𝑐 = √22 ∗ (6.55 ∗ 10−6 𝑎𝑡𝑚)2 + (6.39 ∗ 10−6 𝑎𝑡𝑚)2 = 1.44 ∗ 10−3 𝑎𝑡𝑚 (23)
(5.78∗10−9 )2 (1.44∗10−3 )2
∆𝐾𝑝 = 7.99 ∗ 10−6 √(2.49∗10−9 )2 + (3.12∗10−3 )2 = 1.85 ∗ 10−6 𝑎𝑡𝑚 (24)
𝐽 𝐽
∆𝐺° = −8.314 𝑚𝑜𝑙∗𝐾 ∗ 300.15 𝐾 ∗ (ln 7.99 ∗ 10−6 𝑎𝑡𝑚) = 2.93 ∗ 104 𝑚𝑜𝑙 (9)
10−6 𝐽
∆(∆𝐺°) = −8.314 ∗ 300.15 𝐾 ∗ 1.85 ∗ ∗ 10−6 = 5.79 ∗ 102 𝑚𝑜𝑙 (26)
7.99
𝐽 𝐽
(2.38 ∗ 105 𝑚𝑜𝑙 − 2.93 ∗ 104 𝑚𝑜𝑙 )⁄ 2 𝐽
∆𝑆° = 300.15 𝐾 = 6.94 ∗ 10 𝐾∗𝑚𝑜𝑙 (11)
1 𝐽
∆(∆𝑆°) = 300.15 √(7.2 ∗ 103 )2 + (5.79 ∗ 102 )2 = 2.31 𝐾∗𝑚𝑜𝑙 (27)
𝐽 5 3
𝑆𝑀 = 8.314 𝑚𝑜𝑙∗𝐾 ∗ 2.303 [− log 3.24 ∗ 10−3 + 2 log 300.15 + 2 log 74.08 − 0.5053] (13)
𝐽 𝐽
𝑆𝑀 = 2.10 ∗ 102 𝐾∗𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑆𝐷 = 2.73 ∗ 102 𝐾∗𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝐽 𝐽 𝐽
∆𝑆°𝑆−𝑇 = 2 ∗ 2.10 ∗ 102 𝐾∗𝑚𝑜𝑙 − 2.73 ∗ 102 𝐾∗𝑚𝑜𝑙 = 1.47 ∗ 102 𝐾∗𝑚𝑜𝑙 (12)
Table 2 includes the measured values for the experiment and their conversions to
Table 4: Error in Kp
(P-Pi) Δ(P-Pi) 4(P-Pi)^2 Δ4(P-Pi)^2 (2Pi-P) Δ(2Pi-P) Kp ΔKp
0.00E+00 9.04E-06 0.00E+00 0.00E+00 3.20E-03 1.43E-05 0.00E+00 0.00E+00
3.95E-05 9.10E-06 6.23E-09 2.87E-09 3.16E-03 1.43E-05 1.97E-06 9.10E-07
7.89E-05 9.16E-06 2.49E-08 5.78E-09 3.12E-03 1.44E-05 7.99E-06 1.85E-06
9.21E-05 9.17E-06 3.39E-08 6.76E-09 3.11E-03 1.44E-05 1.09E-05 2.18E-06
1.45E-04 9.25E-06 8.38E-08 1.07E-08 3.05E-03 1.44E-05 2.75E-05 3.51E-06
1.71E-04 9.29E-06 1.17E-07 1.27E-08 3.03E-03 1.45E-05 3.87E-05 4.20E-06
2.24E-04 9.37E-06 2.00E-07 1.68E-08 2.97E-03 1.45E-05 6.73E-05 5.64E-06
2.76E-04 9.44E-06 3.05E-07 2.09E-08 2.92E-03 1.46E-05 1.05E-04 7.15E-06
3.16E-04 9.50E-06 3.99E-07 2.40E-08 2.88E-03 1.46E-05 1.38E-04 8.34E-06
3.82E-04 9.60E-06 5.82E-07 2.93E-08 2.82E-03 1.47E-05 2.07E-04 1.04E-05
4.34E-04 9.68E-06 7.54E-07 3.36E-08 2.76E-03 1.47E-05 2.73E-04 1.22E-05
4.87E-04 9.76E-06 9.48E-07 3.80E-08 2.71E-03 1.48E-05 3.50E-04 1.41E-05
5.39E-04 9.84E-06 1.16E-06 4.25E-08 2.66E-03 1.48E-05 4.38E-04 1.60E-05
6.45E-04 1.00E-05 1.66E-06 5.16E-08 2.55E-03 1.49E-05 6.51E-04 2.03E-05
7.24E-04 1.01E-05 2.09E-06 5.86E-08 2.47E-03 1.50E-05 8.47E-04 2.38E-05
8.29E-04 1.03E-05 2.75E-06 6.82E-08 2.37E-03 1.51E-05 1.16E-03 2.89E-05
9.08E-04 1.04E-05 3.30E-06 7.56E-08 2.29E-03 1.52E-05 1.44E-03 3.32E-05
9.74E-04 1.05E-05 3.79E-06 8.19E-08 2.22E-03 1.53E-05 1.71E-03 3.70E-05
1.05E-03 1.06E-05 4.43E-06 8.96E-08 2.14E-03 1.54E-05 2.07E-03 4.20E-05
1.20E-03 1.09E-05 5.73E-06 1.04E-07 2.00E-03 1.55E-05 2.87E-03 5.24E-05
1.29E-03 1.10E-05 6.65E-06 1.14E-07 1.91E-03 1.56E-05 3.49E-03 5.99E-05
1.37E-03 1.11E-05 7.49E-06 1.22E-07 1.83E-03 1.57E-05 4.10E-03 6.71E-05
1.45E-03 1.13E-05 8.38E-06 1.31E-07 1.75E-03 1.58E-05 4.79E-03 7.51E-05
1.55E-03 1.15E-05 9.64E-06 1.42E-07 1.64E-03 1.59E-05 5.86E-03 8.70E-05
1.64E-03 1.16E-05 1.08E-05 1.53E-07 1.55E-03 1.60E-05 6.97E-03 9.89E-05
1.79E-03 1.18E-05 1.28E-05 1.70E-07 1.41E-03 1.62E-05 9.10E-03 1.21E-04
1.96E-03 1.21E-05 1.54E-05 1.90E-07 1.24E-03 1.64E-05 1.24E-02 1.55E-04
2.07E-03 1.23E-05 1.71E-05 2.04E-07 1.13E-03 1.66E-05 1.51E-02 1.81E-04
2.17E-03 1.25E-05 1.89E-05 2.17E-07 1.03E-03 1.67E-05 1.84E-02 2.12E-04
2.37E-03 1.28E-05 2.24E-05 2.43E-07 8.29E-04 1.70E-05 2.71E-02 2.94E-04
2.55E-03 1.32E-05 2.61E-05 2.69E-07 6.45E-04 1.72E-05 4.04E-02 4.18E-04
2.79E-03 1.36E-05 3.11E-05 3.03E-07 4.08E-04 1.75E-05 7.63E-02 7.43E-04
3.01E-03 1.40E-05 3.63E-05 3.37E-07 1.84E-04 1.78E-05 1.97E-01 1.83E-03
3.25E-03 1.44E-05 4.23E-05 3.74E-07 -5.26E-05 1.82E-05 -8.03E-01 -7.11E-03
3.47E-03 1.48E-05 4.83E-05 4.11E-07 -2.76E-04 1.85E-05 -1.75E-01 -1.49E-03
3.72E-03 1.52E-05 5.55E-05 4.54E-07 -5.26E-04 1.88E-05 -1.05E-01 -8.65E-04
Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................
Reagents, materials, and laboratory space were provided by the Penn State Chemistry
Department. Special thanks to Rebecca Katz and Prof. Bratoljub H. Milosavljevic for assistance
References .......................................................................................................................................
1. Milosavljevic, B. “Lab Packet for CHEM 457 Experimental Physical Chemistry.” Fall 2018.
3. "Structure and energetics of the hydronium hydration shells" J. Phys. Chem. A. 111 (12):
2253–2256.