Surveyor Guide Notes On Tail Shaft Survey: 1. Propeller Shafts 1.1 Propeller Shaft Clearances - Measurement
Surveyor Guide Notes On Tail Shaft Survey: 1. Propeller Shafts 1.1 Propeller Shaft Clearances - Measurement
Surveyor Guide Notes On Tail Shaft Survey: 1. Propeller Shafts 1.1 Propeller Shaft Clearances - Measurement
1. Propeller Shafts
Periodical docking surveys and periodical propeller shaft surveys are incomplete without
propeller shaft clearances. These may be determined as bellows:
When the shaft is removed for survey or maintenance, by calibration of journals and
bearing bores.
When bearing is exposed with shaft in place for partial survey or seal maintenance, by
leveler gauges, or soft wood wedge driven between shaft and bearing then measured
with calipers.
Normal running condition, by poker gauge comparing readings with previous
measurements.
In normal running condition, by lifting shaft and measuring the lift by dial gauge
(Less accurate). Case needed to avoid undue force. Assessment of poker gauge
readings can only be made if records of the previous readings are available and the
relative shaft clearance is known. Poker gauge readings taken in isolation produce no
reliable value of bearing clearance.
NOTE: When stem tube bearings are renewed or re-metallic, clearances will be back to
original. On refit, it is essential that these clearances are recorded and also the corresponding
new poker gauge readings for future comparison.
With most modem stem tube seal designs, the poker gauge measures from the seal box “OD”
to the seal sleeve “OD”. Hence, whenever the seal is fitted with a new sleeve or the sleeve is
machined, the poker gauge readings “as fitted” should be recorded in conjunction with the
measured clearance, by feeler gauges, calibration or both, since the bearing will be accessible
during seal overhaul.
1.2 Propeller Shaft Clearances - Initial and Maximum Allowed
1.2.1 The following clearances are intended for the guidance of Surveyors.
Recommendations of designers and manufacturers may differ and the Surveyor should take
notice of these in deciding whether departures from the values given here are justified.
In the case of initial clearances drawings should be checked and for special materials such as
“Tufnol” the manufacturer’s technical information should be heeded to allow for expansion
of the bearing material on submersion in water.
1.2.3 Propeller shafts running in lignum-vitae or "Tufnol" type lined bearings water
lubricated:
NOTE: The stern gland should be repacked or at least partially repacked at each periodical
bottom survey.
1.3.2 Crack detection may be by dye penetrant method or magnetic particle method.
Magnetic particle inspection is preferred because it is more sensitive when properly carried
out.
In both cases the area to be checked must be thoroughly cleaned. Where possible a qualified
technician is preferred working to recognized standards.
The sensitivity of the magnetic particle inspection is easily checked using a field strength
indicator (burmah castrol strip).
If cracks are detected and not easily removed by light polishing it is advisable to check the
crack depth by ultrasonic before proceeding.
Slight surface defects (corrosion or cracks) can be machined out provided that rule diameter
is not reduced by more than 3 %.
1.3.4 In the case of a propeller-shaft in normal steel and the propeller hub in stainless steel,
the holes of the propeller-flange and the propeller-flange itself have to be carefully inspected
for electric-chemical corrosion.
Seawater has to be avoided and adequate protection is to be foreseen.
Corrosion on the conical part of the propeller shaft may be repaired by machining the taper.
This will result in the propeller moving forward which must be contracted by fitting a spacer
between the shaft couplings. The maximum thickness allowed for this spacer is 25 % of the
intermediate shaft flange thickness. It is therefore the intermediate shaft flange thickness
which determines the maximum amount which can be machined off the cone.
e.g. Intermediate shaft coupling flange thickness 100 mm, then maximum spacer which may
be employed = 25 mm, if propeller shaft taper = 1 in 12 the radial amount which may be
machined = 25/12= approx. 2 mm
Surface contact of propeller bore to shaft cone should be checked using Prussian blue. There
should be a minimum of 70 % contact equally distributed.
NOTE: As well as rectification of the damage, the cause must also be determined and repairs
and preventative action taken to avoid a recurrence. The usual source of leakages are from a
badly jointed and sealed lairing cone on the ack of the propeller or leakage past the sealing
ring and/or gasket on the forward face - ensure the “O” ring is the correct size so that
compression and sealing is achieved.
All free spaces between propeller shaft cone, propeller boss, nut and propeller cap are to be
filled with a material insoluble in sea water and non-corrosive.
Arrangements are to be made to allow any air present in these spaces to escape at the moment
of filling. It is recommended to test these spaces under a pressure at least equal to that
corresponding to the immersion of the propeller in order to check, after filling, the tightness
obtained.
1.6 Propeller shafts with bronze liners
1.6.1 General
Always check carefully the inboard part of the shaft where water from the stern gland may
have caused corrosion cracking, characteristic X-shaped fissures particularity on the coupling
Flange filled. This part of the shaft is best protected by a special coating.
Beware also of electro-chemical corrosion in the region of the end of the liner.
The bronze liners protect those parts of the shaft which would otherwise be in contact with
sea water.
Continuous liners -either in one piece or in several sections cover the shaft from forward
propeller boss to forward part of the stern gland. Parts of liner most liable to wear are those in
way of stern gland packing, or the liner can be eroded by vibration or hammering of the shaft.
Su objected to torque reaction with the shaft; the liner can crack (on its surface, or in other
places). Cracks may also result from occasional over-heating. Sea water can seep through the
cracks and cause rapid corrosion of the shaft.
Other types of corrosion are the result of liner assembly. Liners are generally held to tail shaft
by shrinkage. Shafts are submitted to helical stress and it is unlikely that the same distortions
are equally applied over the whole length of liner.
Such fretting is often the cause of corrosion noted under aft extremity of liners where sea
water filters in. What has been said about shaft and liner relative motions is also true for liner
sections connected by (hammered or shrunk) red copper joints. Connections of two adjacent
liner sections are submitted to torque reactions and if copper joints no longer ensure the
necessary water tightness: corrosion is then frequent under joints and adjacent area.
The Surveyor shall also examine carefully the surface of the liner for cracks or porosity, and
if in doubt, he will carry out a non-destructive check.
Any cracking or slackening of the liner (especially all, next to propeller) or loosening of
copper joints will result in corrosion of the shaft.
s for such defects, loose copper joints will need to be withdrawn and the liner surface in way
machined off and other corroded areas should also be machined so that the shaft surface can
be inspected.
The Surveyor will also check the bearing surface and wear in way of bush(es) and stern
gland.
Cracks, wear
These measurements shall be taken alter machining of corroded or ribbed areas of the liner.
When damage (fissures or wear) is important and requires the renewal of the liner, the
Surveyor shall proceed as for the liner of a new shaft.
The new liner or liner sections ordered shall be submitted to the Society’s factory inspection
test (quality of material, hydraulic test), and liner lit and good condition (no defects) shall be
checked alter machining.
When renewal of the liner is not necessary and it is difficult or impossible to change only a
section of it without removing the part of liner in good condition, it is often easier to have the
damaged part re-metallic.
Some yards can replace the damaged liner portion by two hail shells fitted on to the shaft and
welded together longitudinally. Any such repair shall be submitted to Technical Office for
approval.
Ribbing requires the complete - or part renewal of the liner only if thickness inside of grooves
is inferior to hall the regulation thickness. When ribbing is slight, however, i.e. when depth of
grooves is 3 mm, liner shall be machined over the whole length in way of aft stuffing box.
Slight ribbing needs only to be filed down or smoothed away with emery cloth.