Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 24 views

    The European Union

    Uploaded by

    sankalp yashvardhan
    A quasi-easement is an implied easement that exists when a property is divided and a use is present that benefits one part of the land and burdens another. For a quasi-easement to be implied, the use must have existed at the time of division, been apparent, and continued afterwards. However, courts require stricter necessity for easements benefitting the original landowner. Surveyors must consider the possibility of implied easements and not assume uses not expressly mentioned in deeds are encroachments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    The European Union

    Uploaded by

    sankalp yashvardhan
    24 views2 pages
    A quasi-easement is an implied easement that exists when a property is divided and a use is present that benefits one part of the land and burdens another. For a quasi-easement to be implied, the use must have existed at the time of division, been apparent, and continued afterwards. However, courts require stricter necessity for easements benefitting the original landowner. Surveyors must consider the possibility of implied easements and not assume uses not expressly mentioned in deeds are encroachments.

    Original Description:

    Quasi element

    Original Title

    6715786 the European Union

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    A quasi-easement is an implied easement that exists when a property is divided and a use is present that benefits one part of the land and burdens another. For a quasi-easement to be implied, the use must have existed at the time of division, been apparent, and continued afterwards. However, courts require stricter necessity for easements benefitting the original landowner. Surveyors must consider the possibility of implied easements and not assume uses not expressly mentioned in deeds are encroachments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    24 views2 pages

    The European Union

    Uploaded by

    sankalp yashvardhan
    A quasi-easement is an implied easement that exists when a property is divided and a use is present that benefits one part of the land and burdens another. For a quasi-easement to be implied, the use must have existed at the time of division, been apparent, and continued afterwards. However, courts require stricter necessity for easements benefitting the original landowner. Surveyors must consider the possibility of implied easements and not assume uses not expressly mentioned in deeds are encroachments.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Easements

     Not  Mentioned  
    Quasi  Easement  
    by  
    Knud  E.  Hermansen†  
    P.L.S.,  P.E.,  Ph.D.,  Esq.  
     
    The  previous  articles  have  introduced  surveyors  to  two  forms  of  implied  easements  
    that  arrive  by  information  found  in  the  documents  rather  than  express  conveyance  
    of  the  easements.  The  failure  of  the  surveyor  to  identify  implied  easements  may  
    subject  the  surveyor  to  liability  when  damages  to  the  client  result.  
     
    One   form   of   implied   easement   is   known   as   a   quasi   easement.   A   quasi   easement   is  
    almost   always   appurtenant   to   property.   In   other   words,   once   the   easement   is  
    created,   it   attached   to   one   property   and   burdens   other   property,   and   will   exist  
    regardless  if  mentioned  in  deeds  to  the  property.    
    A  quasi  easement  will  exist  when  there  is:  1)  an  existing  use  at  the  time  of  a  division  
    and   grant,   2)   the   use   was   apparent   at   the   division   and   grant,   and   3)   the   use  
    continued   for   the   benefit   (reasonable   comfort   and   enjoyment)   of   a   property   after  
    the  division  and  conveyance.    
    In  other  words,  the  respective  lots  arising  after  the  division  will  be  burdened  or  
    benefited  as  the  situation  existed  prior  to  the  division  so  long  as  the  use  is  either  
    known  to  exist  or  the  situation  is  such  as  to  reveal  its  existence  to  anyone  exercising  
    ordinary  care.    As  a  consequence  a  buried  or  concealed  use  will  not  pass  as  a  quasi  
    easement.  Such  a  use  to  be  recognized  as  an  easement  requires  an  express  grant  

    Septic Field
    Septic Field

    Mother in Law
    House
    Home

     
     
    In   the   above   example,   the   owner   decided   to   convey   an   existing   “mother-­‐in-­‐law  
    house”   and   lot.   (Hopefully   after   the   mother-­‐in-­‐law   passed   away.)   In   the   above  
    example,   the   grantee   who   purchased   the   mother-­‐in-­‐law   house   and   lot   would   have   a  
    quasi   easement   for   the   driveway   and   a   quasi   easement   for   the   utility   line.   The  
    grantor  may  have  a  quasi  easement  for  the  septic  field  and  driveway.  
    Some   states   require   that   the   use   forming   the   basis   for   the   quasi   easement   be   a  
    necessary   use   with   strict   necessity   required   when   benefiting   the   grantor’s  
    remaining  land.  Under  the  criteria  of  strict  necessity,  the  grantor’s  septic  field  may  
    not   qualify   as   a   quasi   easement   because   the   septic   field   can   be   located   at   a   different  
    location.  Therefore  an  easement  for  the  existing  septic  field  is  not  strictly  necessary.    

    The   courts   require   a   higher   standard   for   the   grantor   to   have   a   quasi   easement  
    because  the  grantor,  exercising  due  diligence  in  the  preparation  of  the  deed,  could  
    have   expressly   stated   what   was   intended   to   be   reserved.   Put   in   other   words,   why  
    should   the   innocent   grantee   be   burdened   by   a   use   that   the   grantor   failed   to  
    expressly   reserve   in   the   grantor’s   favor.   In   these   cases,   the   courts   have   reasoned  
    that  the  grantee  should  only  be  subject  to  a  use  not  expressly  reserved  when  the  use  
    is  apparent  and  of  such  necessity  that  a  reasonable  person  would  have  to  know  the  
    use  was  meant  to  be  reserved  in  favor  of  the  grantor.  
    As   seen   from   the   example,   easements   for   a   use   that   existed   at   the   time   of   division  
    and   was   continued   after   the   division   give   rise   to   an   implied   easement.   The   surveyor  
    must  not  presume  that  every  use  not  reflected  as  an  express  citation  within  the  deed  
    is  an  encroachment.  
    †  Knud  is  a  professor  in  the  surveying  engineering  technology  program  at  the  University  of  Maine.  He  provides  
    consulting  services  in  the  areas  of  boundary  retracement,  boundary  litigation,  roads,  easements,  property  title,  
    land  development,  and  alternative  dispute  resolution.  

    You might also like