Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
69 views

AF5353: Security Analysis & Portfolio Management

The document summarizes key concepts from a lecture on the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT). It introduces CAPM, including its assumptions, formula, and how it relates expected return to beta. It also discusses the security market line and capital market line. The document then covers limitations of CAPM and introduces the APT model and Fama-French three factor model using size and book-to-market factors. Important risk factors for models are also listed.

Uploaded by

kerenkang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
69 views

AF5353: Security Analysis & Portfolio Management

The document summarizes key concepts from a lecture on the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT). It introduces CAPM, including its assumptions, formula, and how it relates expected return to beta. It also discusses the security market line and capital market line. The document then covers limitations of CAPM and introduces the APT model and Fama-French three factor model using size and book-to-market factors. Important risk factors for models are also listed.

Uploaded by

kerenkang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 38

AF5353: Security Analysis &

Portfolio Management
Lecture 5
Instructor: Yong (Jimmy) JIN (jimmy.jin@polyu.edu.hk)
Office: M507D, Li Ka Shing Tower
Office Hour: Tuesday 17:20 to 18:20, 21:30 to 22:30; Friday 13:00 to 15:00
Agenda
• Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
• Security market line
• Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT)
– Multifactor models
• Examples
What is CAPM?
• CAPM is capital asset pricing model, one of the most
fundamental concepts in investment theory.

• It is an equilibrium model that predicts return on a


stock

• To get the prediction, we need to know the expected


return on the market, the stock’s beta coefficient,
and the risk-free rate
CAPM assumptions
• Frictionless markets
– No trading costs

• Unlimited borrowing and lending


– No restrictions on short sales

• Lending and borrowing rates are the same


• Investors care only about means and variances
CAPM assumptions
• Since everyone holds the same risky tangency portfolio and
since the supply of risky assets must equal the demand, this
implies

THE TANGENCY PORTFOLIO IS


THE MARKET PORTFOLIO
• All investors will hold the same portfolio for risky assets –
market portfolio
• Market portfolio contains all securities and the proportion of
each security is its market value as a percentage of total
market value
The formula of CAPM

E[r ]  r f 
Cov(r , rM )
E[rM ]  r f 
Var (rM )
E[r ]  r f   E[rM ]  r f 
Beta
𝑐𝑜𝑣 𝑟 ,𝑟𝑀
• We refer to as beta, 
𝑣𝑎𝑟 𝑟𝑀

E[r ]  rf   E[rM ]  rf 

• Beta of a portfolio is portfolio-weighted average of


individual assets
– For example, beta of an equal-weighted average
of the individual betas
 p  0.5 X  0.5Y
Beta and expected return
• Assume risk-free rate of 3% and equity premium of
6%
• Expected return on GM assuming CAPM is true is
3%+1.269*6%= 10.61%
• In valuation applications, 10.61% would be the
discount rate in the present value formula
– Eg. If you expect GM’s price to be $50 in one year and
expect it to pay a dividend of $2, then the current fair price
is $(50+2)/(1+.1061)=$47.0
Beta and expected return
• A project has the following net after-tax cash flows ( in millions of dollars)
Year from now After-tax Cash Flow
0 -20
1 15
2 25

• The project’s beta is 1.7, rf=9%, E(Rm)=19%


• What’s the NPV of the project?
Security Market Line
E(r)

SML

E(rM)

rf


M= 1.0
Capital Market Line

E(r)

CML
M
E(rM)
rf


m
CML vs. SML
• The CML plots the relation between expected
returns and standard deviation, while the SML is a
relationship between expected returns and 

• All portfolios, whether efficient or not, must lie on


the SML. This is not true for the CML
– Investments with the same mean return can have different
standard deviations, but must have the same . In other
words, the only relevant measure of risk for pricing
securities is  (a measure of covariance)
Sample calculations using CAPM
• E(rm) - rf = .08 rf = .03
• Two securities
– x = 1.25
• E(rx) = .03 + 1.25(.08) = .13 or 13%
– y = .6
• E(ry) = .03 + .6(.08) = .078 or 7.8%
Graph of sample calculations
E(r)

SML

Rx=13%
.08
Rm=11%

Ry=7.8%

3%


.6 1.0 1.25
y x
Disequilibrium example graph
E(r)

SML

15%

Rm=11%

rf=3%


1.0 1.25
Disequilibrium example calculations
• Suppose a security with a  of 1.25 is offering
expected return of 15%
• According to SML, it should be 13%
• Since 15%>13%, this security is underpriced:
offering a high rate of return for its level of risk
Disequilibrium example calculations
• Suppose E(Rm)=12%, risk-free rate=5%
• Security A: beta=-0.5, offers an expected return of 3%
• Security B: beta=1.2, offer an expected return of 12%
• Which security is underpriced and which one is overpriced? Why?
Bottom-line
• Assumption of CAPM are restrictive
• But gives a simple and elegant relation for
expected returns
• Research shows that it is not very accurate
– Still widely used

Other factors affecting returns?


Arbitrage Pricing Theory
• Given 𝑛 factors to determine the asset returns, as follows,

𝑟𝑗 = 𝑎𝑗1 + 𝛽𝑗1 𝐹1 + 𝛽𝑗2 𝐹2 + ⋯ + 𝛽𝑗𝑛 𝐹𝑛 + 𝜖

• where 𝐹𝑘 is some systematic factor, 𝛽𝑗𝑘 is the beta, or


sensitivity to factor 𝑘, or the risk.

𝐸 𝑟𝑗 = 𝑟𝑓 + 𝛽𝑗1 𝑅𝑃1 + 𝛽𝑗2 𝑅𝑃2 + ⋯ + 𝛽𝑗𝑛 𝑅𝑃𝑛

under the no-arbitrage and prefect competition assumption.

Which one is more important?


Factors
• What are the factors?
• For example, firm size?
– Choice 1: firm size, or other characteristics
• The relationship may be nonlinear
– Choice 2: constructed long-short portfolios
• Sort all the firms according to their size, using bottom 50% average return
minus top 50% average return

• Why choice 2 is better?


– Can capture the nonlinear relationship, especially the outliers
– Risk Premium is straightforward, simply average return of the
long short portfolios
Factors
• How does the factor affect the returns?
– Depends on the (risk) exposure to different factors
• Factors can capture the variation of the returns

– The exposure is not necessarily positive


• For example, the negative coefficient of size factor means the
firm is more likely to be a large firm

– Factor model works better for explanation


• Not prediction for the future return
• Mainly discover the alpha
Fama-French Three Factor Model
• Fama-French found that size and B/M do a better job of
explaining returns, so they said the model should be:
ri  rf  i  i (rM  rf )  si ( SMB)  hi ( HML)  ei

SMB = small minus big = rsmall  rbig


HML = high B/M minus low B/M = rvalue  rgrowth

• F&F does a better job  alpha very close to zero


• Main criticism: No theory justifying why size and B/M
should be risk factors.
Fama-French Three Factor Model

ri  rf  i  i (rM  rf )  si ( SMB)  hi ( HML)  ei

SMB = small minus big = rsmall  rbig


HML = high B/M minus low B/M = rvalue  rgrowth
Important Factors
• Market Excess Return: MRP
• Size Factor: SMB
• Value Factor: HML
• Momentum Factor: MOM

• Others:
• Share Issuance: McLean, Pontiff and Watanabe (2009)
• Profitability and Investment: Fama French (2016)
• Volatility: Ang, Hodrick, Xing and Zhang (2006)
• …
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
196306
196603
196812
197109
197406
197703
197912
198209
198506
198803

RMW
199012
199309
199606
199903
200112
200409
200706
• Size Factor: SMB

201003
201212
• Value Factor: HML

201509

0
100
300
400
600
700

200
500
800
196306
196603
196812
197109 • Investment Factor: CMA
• Profitability Factor: RMW

197406
197703
197912
198209
198506
198803
CMA

199012
199309
199606
199903
200112
200409
0
100
300
400
500

200

200706
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200

201003 196306
201212 196306 196604
201509 196608 196902
196910 197112
197212 197410
197602 197708
197904 198006
198206 198304
198508 198602
Fama French 5 Factors

198810 198812
SMB

HML

199112 199110
199502 199408
199804 199706
200106 200004
200408 200302
200710 200512
201012 200810
201402 201108
201406
Factors
• How many factors do we have?
– In academic papers, there are more than 200….
– For example, “… and the Cross-Section of Expected
Returns”
– “Predicting Anomaly Performance with Politics, the
Weather, Global Warming, Sunspots and the Stars”

• Why not many factors needed?


– One factor can be the noise version of the other factor
– One factor can be the linear combination of the other factors
0
5
10
15
20
25
1926
1930
1934
1938
1942
1946
1950
1954
1958

Mkt
1962
1966
1970
1974
1978
Ln(Total Wealth)

1982
1986

Selected Portfolio
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
0
50
100
150
200
250
300

-100
-50

1926
1930
1934
1938
1942
1946
1950
1954
Mkt

1958
1962
1966
1970
1974
• Just based on SMB and HML two factors

1978
Annual Return (%)

1982
Stock Selection Example

1986
Selected Portfolio

1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
2010
2014
CAPM Example #1
• Given information: Assume CAPM holds

𝐸 𝑟𝐴 = 12%, 𝜎𝐴 = 25%

𝐸 𝑟𝐵 = 16%, 𝜎𝐵 = 45%

𝐸 𝑟𝐶 = 10%, 𝜎𝐶 = 30%

• The risk-free rate 𝑟𝑓 = 4%


• Also given that stock C has a β of 0.6
• Find the β of stock B
CAPM Example #1
• Our objective: find the β of stock B
• 𝐸 𝑟𝑏 = 𝑟𝑓 + 𝛽𝑏 [𝐸 𝑟𝑚 − 𝑟𝑓 ]
• _____ = ____ + 𝛽𝑏 [𝐸 𝑟𝑚 − 𝑟𝑓 ]
• _____ = 𝛽𝑏 [𝐸 𝑟𝑚 − 𝑟𝑓 ]

• We need to find the market risk premium so we use stock C


• 𝐸 𝑟𝑐 = 𝑟𝑓 + 𝛽𝑐 [𝐸 𝑟𝑚 − 𝑟𝑓 ]
• ___ = ____ + ____ [𝐸 𝑟𝑚 − 𝑟𝑓 ]
• [𝐸 𝑟𝑚 − 𝑟𝑓 ]=____

• Plug in to find the β of stock B


• ____=𝛽𝑏 ∗ _______ 𝛽𝑏 =_____
CAPM Example #2
Assume CAPM holds and use the following information:
• Portfolio A has E(r) of 15% and β of 2
• Portfolio B has E(r) of 10% and β of 1

Find the expected return on a portfolio with a β of 0.5


CAPM Example #2
• What information do we need?
– Risk-free rate and market risk premium
• What information do we have?
– Two CAPM equations for portfolio A and portfolio B

• Two equations with two unknowns, we can solve these


unknowns
CAPM Example #2
• Two equations:
𝐸 𝑟𝐴 = 𝑟𝑓 + 𝛽𝐴 𝐸 𝑟𝑚 − 𝑟𝑓
____= 𝑟𝑓 + _____ ∗ 𝐸 𝑟𝑚 − 𝑟𝑓 (1)
𝐸 𝑟𝐵 = 𝑟𝑓 + 𝛽𝐵 𝐸 𝑟𝑚 − 𝑟𝑓
____= 𝑟𝑓 + _____ ∗ 𝐸 𝑟𝑚 − 𝑟𝑓 (2)

• Subtract (2) from (1)

____= 𝐸 𝑟𝑚 − 𝑟𝑓
CAPM Example #2
• Plug this into either of the equations

____= 𝑟𝑓 + ______ so 𝑟𝑓 = _____


• Plug this into CAPM to find the return on a portfolio with a
β of 0.5
𝐸 𝑟𝑝 = ________________________
CAPM Example—Question
Assume CAPM holds and use the following information:
• Portfolio A has E(r) of 18% and β of 2.5
• Portfolio B has E(r) of 12% and β of 1.2

Find the expected return on a portfolio with a β of 1.5


CAPM Example #3
• Given the following:
– Assume CAPM holds
– The expected return on the market is 14% with a SD of 20%
– The risk free rate of return is 4%
– The expected return on stock XYZ is 17% with a SD of 40%
– The covariance of XYZ with the market is 6%
– Question asks: Is XYZ fairly priced?
CAPM Example #3
• What do we need?
– Calculate expected return of stock XYZ, and then compare with the offered return
– Beta of XYZ

• What do we have?
– Covariance of the market with XYZ
– Formula to calculate beta using covariance and variance of the market
CAPM Example #3
𝐸 𝑟𝑋𝑌𝑍 = 𝑟𝑓 + 𝛽𝑋𝑌𝑍 𝐸 𝑟𝑚 − 𝑟𝑓

• Calculate 𝛽𝑋𝑌𝑍
𝜎𝑚,𝑋𝑌𝑍
𝛽𝑋𝑌𝑍 = =
𝑉𝑎𝑟(𝑚)

• Calculate expected return of stock XYZ if CAPM holds


0.04+1.5*(0.14-0.04)=0.19 or 19% (remember this is the fair return)

• Compare with the offered return: 17%


17%<19%, future cash flows will be discounted at a lower discount
rate, therefore, the stock is overpriced.
CAPM Example --Question
• Given the following:
– Assume CAPM holds
– The expected return on the market is 14% with a variance of 8%
– The risk free rate of return is 4%
– The expected return on stock XYZ is 17% with a variance of 15%
– The covariance of XYZ with the market is 4%
– Question asks: Is XYZ fairly priced?

You might also like