Stat Con Lecture
Stat Con Lecture
Stat Con Lecture
Do they have the same purpose? Obscurity, ambiguity, what to do? Clear, unambiguous, what to do?
When to apply the law? When to interpret the law? When to construct the law?
In Songco, et al v. NLRC, how did the Supreme Court emphasize the rule in construction and
interpretation of the law?
How about in Ramirez v. CA? In Domingo v. COA? In Republic V. CA, 299 SCRA 199?
Three Cardinal Rules when the wordings of the Constitution are subject to interpretation
Verba Legis – ordinary meaning
Ratio Legis Est Anima – according to iontent
Ut Magis Valeat Quam Pereat – better to validate than to invalidate
Purpose of interpretation and construction – ascertain and give effect to legislative intent
National Patrimony
Self Executing provisions
Filipino First Policy – Article 12 sec 10
Section 10. The Congress shall, upon recommendation of the economic and planning agency, when the
national interest dictates, reserve to citizens of the Philippines or to corporations or associations at least
sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens, or such higher percentage as Congress may
prescribe, certain areas of investments. The Congress shall enact measures that will encourage the
formation and operation of enterprises whose capital is wholly owned by Filipinos.cralaw
In the grant of rights, privileges, and concessions covering the national economy and patrimony, the
State shall give preference to qualified Filipinos.cralaw
The State shall regulate and exercise authority over foreign investments within its national jurisdiction
and in accordance with its national goals and priorities.
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
Give example of offices that are under the executive department. Who heads the executive
department. The constitution enumerated the powers of the president, are the powers of the president
limited only to those that are enu,erated in the cosntituion?
As declared by the Supreme Court, the residual power it is the power borne by the President’s duty
to preserve and defend the Constitution. It may also be viewed as a power implicit in the President’s
duty to take care that the laws are faithfully executed. (Marcos v. Manglapus, 177 SCRA 668)
How can the Executive Department modifies a judgment rendered by the judiciary?
How can the Legislative Department modifies a judgment rendered by the Judiciary?
The President vetoed an enrolled bill then he communicated the same to Congress. Undaunted,
Congress repassed the bill by a two third votes, there upon congress sent the repassed bill to the office
of the president. The office of the president refused to receive the bill, contending that the president
had vetoed it already and . Is the contention of the Pr4esdient correct?
John Floyd and Helen Adarna was married before the efectivity of the family code.
Helen Adarna filed a petition for declaration of absolute nullity of her marriage to John Floyd and was
granted. JohnFloyd file a notice of appeal to the RTC, but the RTC ruled in favor of Helen Adarna and
ruled that according to the Rule of Declaration of Absolute Nullity of Void Marriages, a motion for
reconsideration must be filed first before filimng an appeal.
John Floyd countered that the rule applies to marriages contracted during the effectiviyty of the Family
Code, citing among others the provision whish read “This Rule shall govern petitions for declaration of
absolute nullity of void marriages and annulment of voidable marriages under the Family Code of te
Philippines.”of the their marriage was contracted bfore the effectividity of the Family Code.
The RTC ruled and interpreted the rule that it pertains to petition filed during the effectivity of the
Family Code.