Relevance of Management Lesson From Mahabharta: (Type Here)
Relevance of Management Lesson From Mahabharta: (Type Here)
Relevance of Management Lesson From Mahabharta: (Type Here)
Introduction
The mahabharta is the world’s longest poem with over 100,000 stanzas and is an integral part of
India’s cultural heritage. But the mahabharta is not just an entertaining story, it has something to
offer as an education in life itself. The characters and situation in the epic are so varied and vast
in number that almost every situation a human being might face in life are illustrated within the
storyline. For a manager, the epic is a goldmine of information on understanding human reaction
and psychology. The following are the management lessons one can learn from the mahabharta.
5. Learning household chores like cooking and cleaning can actually be beneficial
Such skills definitely make your life easy, less stressful and keep you occupied. We
learned this from the Pandavas experience of an exile in the forest.
The Pandavas never stopped fighting for what rightfully belonged to them. Their
courage and determination is definitely something to admire and learn from.
8. Learning throughout life is the best gift you can give yourself
Arjun grasped whatever came his way. Not only did he learn the best of military
science from Drona, but he was also interested in learning about divine weapons
from Indra. He learnt about Pashupatastra from Mahadev as well. Additionally, he
treated Yudhishter and Krishna as his mentors too, and continued learning whatever
they had to offer.
13. You cannot be stopped if you are passionate about what you do
Most of us know that Arjun was the greatest archer in the world. But Eklavya was
even better than him. He hid himself behind the trees and grasped everything that
Drona taught Arjun. His passion for archery and hunger for knowledge made him
even better than Arjun at archery.
2. Share responsibility
The Kauravas had a centralised leadership with one head of the army at a time who had the
control of the entire 11 divisions (akshouhini). Bhisma, Drona, Karna, Shalya and Aswathamma
pass the command as they fall and for a brief period the army is leaderless. Despite the
commanders Duryodhana is in de facto control. This dichotomy in leadership often results in
clashes.
The Pandavas on the other hand have a modern management structure to their army. Arjuna
was the chief commander of the army, with Lord Krishna as his counsellor. Dhristadymna was
[Type here]
the commander-in-chief and also commander of one of the seven divisions (akshouhini), as six
others were for their.
The sharing of responsibility, thus power leads to a democracy in the management and reduced
reliance on one individual, thus reducing risk.
3. Teamwork succeeds
The Kauravas had number advantage (11 divison Vs. 7 of Pandava) their generals fought their
individual battles:
They were a group of brilliant individuals which made a terrible team. Often described as bees,
hornets and mosquitos put in a jar with clash of egos (Bhisma-Karna, Bhisma-Shakuni, Karna-Shalya)
On the other had the Pandavas fought with one goal, setting aside personal beliefs like Yudhisthira
lying to Drona or Arjuna killing Karna. Again all of them were a part of decision making process.
Teamwork succeeds where individual fails, but the team formed must have the same vision, goal and
passoion.
Bhisma: gave away his secret to die and did not attempt to kill the Pandavas
Drona: too indirectly gave away his secret
Karna: only humiliated but did not kill Yudhisthira and Bhima
Abhimanyu, a 16 year old lad underwent a suicide mission in the chakravyu. It took the
combined effort of 7 competent warriors to overcome this committed soldier
Ghatotkach deliberately fell on the army ranks causing damage even in death
Yudhisthira went to face Karna knowing full well he would be defeated
When selecting a team it is always better to have people who are passionate and committed rather
than people who excel individually. The best man for the job is not the one with the best skills but
with the greatest commitment.
He took the calculated risk and offered all the people to change sides if they wanted to. In
reality he was exploiting the lack of cohesiveness of the enemy but it may have backfired.
[Type here]
The competence of the warriors and the strength of the divisions were skewed towards the
Kauravas which could have precipitated defection from his side. Though it played in his favour
when Yuyutsu crossed over to the Panadav side.
Any venture in the real world comes with associated risk with it and all the decisions require
us to take decisions after evaluation of these risks. Pandavas and Kauravas both took risks but
while Duryodhana’s decisions were whimsical and egoist, the Pandavas took calculated risks
which mostly paid off. But again the various decision making of the two armies teach us one
thing: there are no perfect plans.
6. Women Empowerment
Mahabharata, and by extenuation Hinduism, is probably the oldest and the only to recognize
the importance of women in all realms of the societal working. Some suggest that woman is
indicative of the world we surround and man of the people in it and that when Draupadi is
dishornoured it suggests the exploitation of the world by its inhabitants.
In the epic the Kauravas had a total patriarchal structure, with commanders like Bhisma, a
celibate who could not consider a woman’s perspective.
Pandavas relied on the involvement of women and their thoughts. Kunti, their mother was the supreme
authority, and her word was dharma for Yudhistira. Draupadi was a companion to the Pandavas, and
had it not been for her motivation the Pandavas would have reclined to the forest forever.
In any decision making structure women always bring in a holistic view of the situation. The
aggressive and dominative masculine traits are balanced by harmonic and sustainable traits of a
woman. It is only in a team that is able to have this balance that is able to sustain in the long
term.
Stages: Extending the discussion the avatars of Vishu, (who is a householder worldly God)
defines the stages of a manger in an industry:
Parasurama: is a rule follower, and leads the organization in its very early phase where
discipline is paramount
Rama: sets an example even by sacrifice and his ideals drive the organization
Lord Krishna: the ultimate coach, who develops and instils sense of responsibility in his
pupils. He is a crisis manager who never gets involved directly but through ideas
Buddha/Kalki: depending on the success of the system either detaches himself or ends the
system if it is unsustainable
The managing principle of Lord Krishna are complex, especially since at times they seem to
be full of trickery, deceit and in conflict of Dharma. He used all methods of negotiations to
avoid a conflict but on battlefield it is winning that matters. On pondering you discover that
no one but Lord Krishna knows his exact purpose on the battlefield. Duryodhana is fighting
for the letter of the law and Pandavas on the spirit of the law. Krnsa is there to uphold
principles.
[Type here]
His actions teaches us something very important, recognize the larger purpose. Is it to surpass the
rival? No, he says. Take into account the larger view to mirror your actions. Do not be myopic to
the future needs for present wants. He is the first preceptor of sustainability.
Then again is his coolness in the midst of battle, probably because he is not involved in conflict. A
question arises in my mind that He being God could have stepped in and stopped the massacre to
punish the wrongdoers. Is he justified in his decision of not taking up arms? And it turns out that
he is. Not engaged in battle himself he is able have a different view of the situation and can offer
ingenious alternates. The leader who monitors thus comes up with solutions that escape the team on
real time work.
Each of his actions when views from different views yields a new perspective. Everytime I read the
epic his genius as a manager dawns upon me whose understanding and implementation is a life long
journey.
The timelessness of Mahabharata and the management derived is a subject of immense research.
Timeless and holistic, thus complex as the text is, it truly offers a direction towards solution of all
problems.
A very subtle teaching of the epic is sustainability. The Goddess earth (Draupadi), comes as a cow
to Vishnu to complain of her over exploitation, and God as a cowherd wipes out a generation of
these people, (the princes dishonouring Draupadi). He promises to return again to establish order,
unless we become sustainable.
[Type here]