ECEG 351 Electronics II Spring 2019
ECEG 351 Electronics II Spring 2019
ECEG 351 Electronics II Spring 2019
Provide the details of all solutions, including important intermediate steps. You will not receive
credit if you do not show your work. Some problems might be solvable (or must be solved) using
good engineering approximations or assumptions. In those cases, your answer might differ from
the posted answer by a fairly large margin. Given typical device variations and component
tolerances, that amount of discrepancy is often reasonable. If you justify any approximations you
make, you will be given full credit for such answers.
Assignment:
1. The diagram below is the small-signal model of the output port of a common-emitter
amplifier and its load. Show that the output voltage is given by the symbolic expression
shown next to the diagram. Briefly explain the significance of the frequency-dependent part
of the expression (the fraction to the right of RC||RL).
jω ( RC + RL ) Co
Co vo = − g m vbe ( RC RL )
0.01 µF 1 + jω ( RC + RL ) Co
gmvbe +
RC RL
100 kΩ vo
3.3 kΩ −
2. For the partial amplifier small-signal model considered in the previous problem, find the cut-
off frequency (in Hz) associated with capacitor Co. Then, assuming that vbe = vin, calculate
the magnitude of the midband voltage gain vo/vin and that of the voltage gain at the cut-off
frequency. Assume that the amplifier has a quiescent current of IC = 2.0 mA, the emission
coefficient is n = 1, and VT = 25 mV.
3. [adapted from Prob. 10.15 of Sedra & Smith, 7th ed.] Starting with the expression that gives
fT for a MOSFET and making the approximation that Cgs >> Cgd and that the overlap
component of Cgs is negligibly small, show that
gm 1.5 µn I D
fT = is approximated by fT ≈ .
2π ( Cgs + Cgd ) π L 2CoxWL
(See Sec. 10.2.1 in the textbook for a discussion of overlap capacitance.) This result implies
that operation at a high quiescent drain current value leads to a high fT. It also implies that
faster operation results from smaller devices.
5. Estimate the upper and lower limits of the midband range for the common-gate amplifier
circuit shown below. Before finding the numerical values of the pole frequencies, first find
symbolic expressions for the equivalent resistances seen by each capacitance in the circuit.
Note that you will need to find the quiescent drain current. The MOSFET has parameter
values kn = 4 mA/V2, Vt = 1 V, Cgs = 30 pF, Cgd = 2.0 pF; Cds is negligibly small, and ro is
large enough to ignore. Identify which single capacitors have the most dominant effect in
determining the upper and lower limits of the midband region.
Rsig Ci Co
50 Ω 10 µF 1 µF
vo
+ RD RL
−
RS RG1 2 kΩ 10 kΩ
vsig 2 kΩ 1 MΩ
CG
RG2 VDD = +12 V
3300 pF Cby
1 MΩ
10 µF
6. The upper limit fH of the midband range for the amplifier considered in the previous problem
is about 35 MHz. The value of fH can be reduced by adding a capacitance CL across the load
RL. Find the value of CL that would be necessary to reduce fH to approximately 3 MHz. The
parameter values and assumptions are unchanged from the previous problem.
R1
130 kΩ
VCB +
Rsig = 50 Ω 2N3904
−
Ci Co = 0.5 µF
R2
+ 0.5 µF
− 39 kΩ
vsig +
RE vo RL
3.9 kΩ − 51 Ω
8. [Postponed to HW #8] The common emitter amplifier shown below uses the collector-to-
base feedback biasing method. With the component values shown, the quiescent collector
current is close to 500 µA, and the quiescent collector voltage is close to 6 V. Find the small-
signal midband voltage gain Av = vo/vin, and estimate the upper and lower frequency limits of
the midband range. If you need a value for β (you shouldn’t), you may assume that it is
approximately equal to 150. The datasheet for the 2N3904 is available on the Laboratory
page of the course web site.
VCC = 12 V
CCC = 10 µF
RC
11 kΩ Co = 0.5 µF
Ci R1 IC +
RL
Rsig = 100 Ω 2.2 µF 100 kΩ vo
100 kΩ
vin −
2N3904
+ R2
vsig − 15 kΩ